Vijendra kumar v state
•
0 likes•150 views
The document is a court ruling from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana regarding a petition for bail. The petitioner, Vijender Kumar, is accused of making insulting and derogatory comments on social media against scheduled castes, Muslim women, and creating communal disharmony. The court examined evidence including screenshots of the offensive posts. While the defense argued the charges were not made out, the court found the posts were prima facie derogatory and denied bail, noting freedom of speech does not cover insulting remarks against communities or genders.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
State v _lakhpat_rajora___ors
1) The document summarizes a court case involving multiple defendants charged with rioting, arson, murder, and weapons offenses.
2) It describes the alleged incident on February 25, 2020 where a mob burned down a home, killed a man, and stole property.
3) The investigation led to the arrest of several defendants based on disclosures and evidence, though the defense argues the defendants have been falsely implicated and questions the reliability and timing of witness statements.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Delhi riots accused bail order nov 25
This document is a court order regarding the bail application of Salim Malik, who has been charged under various sections related to rioting and criminal conspiracy. The prosecution argues that Salim was part of a large riotous mob that vandalized and burned down a car showroom, causing significant property damage. While the defense argues Salim was falsely implicated, the prosecution provides witness testimony identifying Salim as being present and participating in the rioting, and says his phone location places him at the crime scene. The court considers both arguments but notes issues with the timing of the witness statement against Salim in denying his bail application.
Guj hc sedition bail aug 3
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Mohd. ayyub order
This document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding a case related to violence that took place in Delhi in February 2020. The petitioner, Mohd Ayyub, seeks bail in an FIR registered for offenses related to rioting, assaulting public servants, and murder. The prosecution argues that the petitioner was identified on CCTV footage going towards the scene of crime and was part of a pre-meditated assault on police personnel. The petitioner's counsel argues that he has been falsely implicated and was merely present as a bystander with no involvement in the violence. The court hears arguments from both sides and reviews video evidence before considering whether to grant bail to the petitioner.
Delhi riots case order sept 28
The document summarizes the key details from a court case involving multiple complaints related to riots in North-East Delhi. It notes that two of the complaints could not have been clubbed together in this case based on the details provided. For the third complaint by Nisar Ahmed, it provides context on his repeated attempts to file complaints with the police about the riots he witnessed on two separate dates, and the threats he faced which led him to approach the court. The court ultimately allowed his petition to have his complaint registered as a separate FIR and not treated as part of this case, based on the details he provided about the two separate dates of incidents.
Mohd bilal order
1) The petitioner seeks bail in an FIR registered for rioting and murder that took place on February 25th, 2020 near Shamshan Ghat, Kabir Nagar during protests against CAA.
2) The prosecution relies on evidence that the petitioner damaged CCTV cameras the previous day and a witness claims to have seen the petitioner at the scene of the crime.
3) Video evidence does not show the petitioner at the scene and the court doubts the witness could reliably identify people from their house during a large riot.
4) Considering the nature of evidence and the time in custody, the court grants the petitioner bail subject to conditions.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
Recommended
State v _lakhpat_rajora___ors
1) The document summarizes a court case involving multiple defendants charged with rioting, arson, murder, and weapons offenses.
2) It describes the alleged incident on February 25, 2020 where a mob burned down a home, killed a man, and stole property.
3) The investigation led to the arrest of several defendants based on disclosures and evidence, though the defense argues the defendants have been falsely implicated and questions the reliability and timing of witness statements.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Delhi riots accused bail order nov 25
This document is a court order regarding the bail application of Salim Malik, who has been charged under various sections related to rioting and criminal conspiracy. The prosecution argues that Salim was part of a large riotous mob that vandalized and burned down a car showroom, causing significant property damage. While the defense argues Salim was falsely implicated, the prosecution provides witness testimony identifying Salim as being present and participating in the rioting, and says his phone location places him at the crime scene. The court considers both arguments but notes issues with the timing of the witness statement against Salim in denying his bail application.
Guj hc sedition bail aug 3
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Mohd. ayyub order
This document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding a case related to violence that took place in Delhi in February 2020. The petitioner, Mohd Ayyub, seeks bail in an FIR registered for offenses related to rioting, assaulting public servants, and murder. The prosecution argues that the petitioner was identified on CCTV footage going towards the scene of crime and was part of a pre-meditated assault on police personnel. The petitioner's counsel argues that he has been falsely implicated and was merely present as a bystander with no involvement in the violence. The court hears arguments from both sides and reviews video evidence before considering whether to grant bail to the petitioner.
Delhi riots case order sept 28
The document summarizes the key details from a court case involving multiple complaints related to riots in North-East Delhi. It notes that two of the complaints could not have been clubbed together in this case based on the details provided. For the third complaint by Nisar Ahmed, it provides context on his repeated attempts to file complaints with the police about the riots he witnessed on two separate dates, and the threats he faced which led him to approach the court. The court ultimately allowed his petition to have his complaint registered as a separate FIR and not treated as part of this case, based on the details he provided about the two separate dates of incidents.
Mohd bilal order
1) The petitioner seeks bail in an FIR registered for rioting and murder that took place on February 25th, 2020 near Shamshan Ghat, Kabir Nagar during protests against CAA.
2) The prosecution relies on evidence that the petitioner damaged CCTV cameras the previous day and a witness claims to have seen the petitioner at the scene of the crime.
3) Video evidence does not show the petitioner at the scene and the court doubts the witness could reliably identify people from their house during a large riot.
4) Considering the nature of evidence and the time in custody, the court grants the petitioner bail subject to conditions.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Delhi session court april 25 order
This document is a court order summarizing a criminal revision petition filed by the State against an order directing the police to register separate FIRs based on the complaints of the respondent Nishar Ahmed. The court order discusses the legal principles around clubbing of complaints and registration of separate FIRs. It notes that while similar complaints can be clubbed to protect the accused, if the incidents are different with different accused, separate FIRs should be registered to allow for separate investigations and trials. After reviewing the facts and complaints made by Nishar Ahmed regarding two separate incidents of rioting on different dates, the court finds that his later complaint was not properly clubbed with an earlier FIR and orders investigation of his complaints in separate FIRs.
Delhi riots accused bail order dec 11
This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Aarif @ Mota, who has been charged under various sections related to rioting and murder. The prosecution argues that Aarif was part of an unlawful assembly that killed Zakir during communal riots on February 25, 2020. However, the defense argues that it is unlikely a Muslim boy would have joined a riotous mob consisting mainly of Hindus. The eyewitnesses did not clearly describe Aarif's role, and video footage does not show him. As the applicant's involvement in the unlawful assembly and murder is unclear, the court finds that he should be granted bail.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Delhi riots bail feb 3
1. This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Kuldeep Singh, who is accused in an FIR for rioting and murder.
2. The defense argues that Kuldeep should be granted bail on the grounds that other co-accused have received bail and he has been in custody since March 2020. However, the prosecution argues that Kuldeep was identified by witnesses as part of the riotous mob that beat the victim to death.
3. The judge heard arguments from both sides and will review the case details and chargesheet before making a decision on whether to grant bail to Kuldeep Singh.
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
The petitioners, Siddharth Varadarajan and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against them under Sections 153-B and 505(2) of IPC by the Rampur Police. The state was given 3 weeks to file a counter affidavit. The court also ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners pursuant to the interim protection granted by the Supreme Court until the next hearing on November 24th. The petitioners must also submit a self-attested computer generated copy of the Supreme Court order along with an identity proof.
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
Parties in this Criminal Matter are CORRUPT, CRIMINAL, CROOK JUDGES, ADVOCATES POLICE and BANK OFFICIALS in M.A NO. 583 of 2020 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 wherein rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India has been suspended through N.B.W u/s 83 Cr.Pc. causing jurisdictional error deliberately and secretly since 2011 by the State of Bihar and others and wherein Order dated 21.10.2016 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 of Supreme Court of India has stood in breach of Article 21 of Constitution of India as a result of that the petitioner no.02 has succumbed to suspicious death on 11.11.2017 and petitioner no.01 is likely to succumb to suspicious death soon because the nexus of state and mafia has organized mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner and has been compelled to remain underground by these corrupt, criminal, crook and goon’s organs of the state.
Guj hc aug 19 order
This document is an order from the High Court of Gujarat regarding two petitions challenging sections of the Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act, 2003 as amended in 2021. The court heard arguments from both sides and decided to grant an interim stay on the operation of certain sections of the amended Act. Specifically, the court ruled that pending further hearings, marriages solemnized between people of different religions without force, allurement or fraud cannot be termed unlawful conversions under the Act in order to protect interfaith couples from harassment. The court found that the amended Act interferes with individuals' right to marriage and religious choice under the Constitution of India. It set the next hearing date as September 30th.
Irshad ali hc
This document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding violence that took place in Delhi in February 2020. The petitioner, Irshad Ali, seeks bail in an FIR related to the violence. The prosecution claims there is evidence from CCTV footage and witness statements identifying the petitioner at the scene of the crime attacking police with a stick. The petitioner's counsel argues there is no substantive evidence against the petitioner and his arrest 9 months later was unjustified. The court heard arguments from both sides and reviewed video evidence before considering whether to grant bail to the petitioner.
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
1. The petitioner has filed this review petition challenging the Supreme Court's October 21, 2016 order in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dismissing the petition with liberty to approach the Patna High Court.
2. The petitioner argues this order will have far-reaching negative consequences for the public, violate principles of natural justice, and result in a miscarriage of justice.
3. The petitioner further argues the Supreme Court failed to consider that the Delhi High Court had already settled the matter on July 23, 2013, and the petitioner was seeking punitive action for misconduct of state authorities rather than dispute settlement.
Telangana hc order june 17 police brutality covid
The court ordered the police to submit injury reports, statements recorded, and updates on departmental inquiries into several incidents. The police counter-affidavit lacked these details and provided questionable explanations for some incidents. The court directed the police to submit the missing information by June 29th and listed the case for further hearing on June 30th.
Ashish kumar vs state
The court document summarizes a bail application hearing for Ashish Kumar, who was arrested for his participation in a tractor rally protest on January 26, 2021 that turned violent. The prosecution argues Kumar participated in the unlawful assembly and damaged property. Kumar's lawyer argues he was falsely implicated and his continued custody serves no purpose. Considering Kumar has been in custody since the incident with no prior record, and there is no evidence he attempted to harm police, the judge grants bail subject to conditions of not contacting witnesses and informing the court of any address changes.
Sadiq order hc
This document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding bail application number 2474/2021. The order provides background on the case, which involves violence and riots that took place in Delhi in February 2020. The petitioner is seeking bail in an FIR related to the violence. The order discusses the facts of the case, evidence and identification of the petitioner in videos from the scene, arguments from the petitioner's lawyer and the state, and the court's consideration of whether bail should be granted. Ultimately, the court provides a detailed summary of the arguments from both sides and the facts of the case in considering the bail application.
20211117 madras hc order on caste and conversion
The petitioner, who belongs to the Christian Adi-Dravidar community, married a woman who belongs to the Hindu Arunthathiyar community. He applied for an inter-caste marriage certificate to receive benefits but was denied. The court dismissed the petition, finding that conversion of religion does not change one's caste. Since both the petitioner and his wife belonged to Scheduled Castes by birth, they do not qualify for an inter-caste marriage certificate merely due to the petitioner's religious conversion. The purpose of such certificates is to benefit those who intermarry across major caste divisions, not for couples who share the same original caste.
Display pdf (11)
This document is a bail petition order from a court in India. It summarizes a case involving 15 individuals who were arrested and charged with various offenses related to participating in an unauthorized protest that turned violent. The defense argued the individuals were wrongly implicated and the charges were excessive. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the serious nature of the offenses. After reviewing evidence and considering the individuals had been in custody for 15 days, the court granted bail with conditions, finding continued custody was not necessary and the evidence did not fully support the charges.
Delhi hc may 24 bail delhi riots
The document is a court judgment regarding a bail application. It summarizes the following key details:
1) The petitioner sought bail in an FIR for offenses related to rioting and attacking police officers, resulting in one death and injuries.
2) The prosecution argued footage showed the petitioner as part of the mob pelting stones, but the identification was unclear.
3) The petitioner argued he suffered from a mental disorder at the time and a co-accused received bail, but the court said mental state is a trial matter.
4) Considering the unclear identification and time already served, the court granted bail with conditions but made no comment on the case merits.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura registered a suo motu public interest litigation based on press reports of violence that occurred on October 26th in North Tripura, Unakoti, and Sipahijala districts. The Advocate General provided details of cases registered, peace meetings held, and steps taken to maintain law and order. The Court appreciated the state's efforts but directed forming peace committees at sub-divisional and panchayat levels. It also directed the state to provide details of the investigation and compensation to victims. The Court commended the media's role in restoring peace but warned against spread of fake news on social media.
Sc thwaha fasal judgement 28-oct-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard appeals challenging a High Court order granting bail to two individuals accused of terrorist activities. The individuals were accused of being members of a terrorist organization and charged with offenses under India's anti-terrorism laws. The High Court had set aside bail for one accused but confirmed it for the other. The appeals argued that the charges made out a prima facie case that the accused intended to further terrorist activities based on materials seized from them. However, the High Court found that the charge sheet did not show the accused had an intention to encourage or facilitate terrorist acts as required by law. The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant provisions and prior case law on this issue.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Aparna purohit v__state
This document summarizes a court order regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Aparna Purohit, who is Head of India Originals at Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. The application seeks bail in connection with an FIR filed against her for a controversial web series called "Tandav" that was streamed on Amazon Prime Video. The court heard arguments from lawyers for Purohit and the state government. It noted that multiple FIRs have been filed against Purohit in different states for the web series. It considered the applicant's arguments that no offenses were committed but reserved its order.
Salim v state
1. The document details a court order regarding an application filed under Section 156(3) of the CrPC by the complainant Saleem seeking directions for the registration of an FIR for offenses allegedly committed against him.
2. The complainant alleges that in February 2020, during communal riots in Delhi, some neighbors attacked his home with guns, stones, and petrol bombs. He called the police for help but no one arrived.
3. The court examines the complainant's application, the police report, and video evidence. It discusses relevant sections of the CrPC regarding police investigation and registration of FIRs. The court will further examine the matter and issue directions.
More Related Content
What's hot
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Delhi session court april 25 order
This document is a court order summarizing a criminal revision petition filed by the State against an order directing the police to register separate FIRs based on the complaints of the respondent Nishar Ahmed. The court order discusses the legal principles around clubbing of complaints and registration of separate FIRs. It notes that while similar complaints can be clubbed to protect the accused, if the incidents are different with different accused, separate FIRs should be registered to allow for separate investigations and trials. After reviewing the facts and complaints made by Nishar Ahmed regarding two separate incidents of rioting on different dates, the court finds that his later complaint was not properly clubbed with an earlier FIR and orders investigation of his complaints in separate FIRs.
Delhi riots accused bail order dec 11
This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Aarif @ Mota, who has been charged under various sections related to rioting and murder. The prosecution argues that Aarif was part of an unlawful assembly that killed Zakir during communal riots on February 25, 2020. However, the defense argues that it is unlikely a Muslim boy would have joined a riotous mob consisting mainly of Hindus. The eyewitnesses did not clearly describe Aarif's role, and video footage does not show him. As the applicant's involvement in the unlawful assembly and murder is unclear, the court finds that he should be granted bail.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Delhi riots bail feb 3
1. This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Kuldeep Singh, who is accused in an FIR for rioting and murder.
2. The defense argues that Kuldeep should be granted bail on the grounds that other co-accused have received bail and he has been in custody since March 2020. However, the prosecution argues that Kuldeep was identified by witnesses as part of the riotous mob that beat the victim to death.
3. The judge heard arguments from both sides and will review the case details and chargesheet before making a decision on whether to grant bail to Kuldeep Singh.
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
The petitioners, Siddharth Varadarajan and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against them under Sections 153-B and 505(2) of IPC by the Rampur Police. The state was given 3 weeks to file a counter affidavit. The court also ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners pursuant to the interim protection granted by the Supreme Court until the next hearing on November 24th. The petitioners must also submit a self-attested computer generated copy of the Supreme Court order along with an identity proof.
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
Parties in this Criminal Matter are CORRUPT, CRIMINAL, CROOK JUDGES, ADVOCATES POLICE and BANK OFFICIALS in M.A NO. 583 of 2020 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 wherein rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India has been suspended through N.B.W u/s 83 Cr.Pc. causing jurisdictional error deliberately and secretly since 2011 by the State of Bihar and others and wherein Order dated 21.10.2016 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 of Supreme Court of India has stood in breach of Article 21 of Constitution of India as a result of that the petitioner no.02 has succumbed to suspicious death on 11.11.2017 and petitioner no.01 is likely to succumb to suspicious death soon because the nexus of state and mafia has organized mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner and has been compelled to remain underground by these corrupt, criminal, crook and goon’s organs of the state.
Guj hc aug 19 order
This document is an order from the High Court of Gujarat regarding two petitions challenging sections of the Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act, 2003 as amended in 2021. The court heard arguments from both sides and decided to grant an interim stay on the operation of certain sections of the amended Act. Specifically, the court ruled that pending further hearings, marriages solemnized between people of different religions without force, allurement or fraud cannot be termed unlawful conversions under the Act in order to protect interfaith couples from harassment. The court found that the amended Act interferes with individuals' right to marriage and religious choice under the Constitution of India. It set the next hearing date as September 30th.
Irshad ali hc
This document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding violence that took place in Delhi in February 2020. The petitioner, Irshad Ali, seeks bail in an FIR related to the violence. The prosecution claims there is evidence from CCTV footage and witness statements identifying the petitioner at the scene of the crime attacking police with a stick. The petitioner's counsel argues there is no substantive evidence against the petitioner and his arrest 9 months later was unjustified. The court heard arguments from both sides and reviewed video evidence before considering whether to grant bail to the petitioner.
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
1. The petitioner has filed this review petition challenging the Supreme Court's October 21, 2016 order in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dismissing the petition with liberty to approach the Patna High Court.
2. The petitioner argues this order will have far-reaching negative consequences for the public, violate principles of natural justice, and result in a miscarriage of justice.
3. The petitioner further argues the Supreme Court failed to consider that the Delhi High Court had already settled the matter on July 23, 2013, and the petitioner was seeking punitive action for misconduct of state authorities rather than dispute settlement.
Telangana hc order june 17 police brutality covid
The court ordered the police to submit injury reports, statements recorded, and updates on departmental inquiries into several incidents. The police counter-affidavit lacked these details and provided questionable explanations for some incidents. The court directed the police to submit the missing information by June 29th and listed the case for further hearing on June 30th.
Ashish kumar vs state
The court document summarizes a bail application hearing for Ashish Kumar, who was arrested for his participation in a tractor rally protest on January 26, 2021 that turned violent. The prosecution argues Kumar participated in the unlawful assembly and damaged property. Kumar's lawyer argues he was falsely implicated and his continued custody serves no purpose. Considering Kumar has been in custody since the incident with no prior record, and there is no evidence he attempted to harm police, the judge grants bail subject to conditions of not contacting witnesses and informing the court of any address changes.
Sadiq order hc
This document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding bail application number 2474/2021. The order provides background on the case, which involves violence and riots that took place in Delhi in February 2020. The petitioner is seeking bail in an FIR related to the violence. The order discusses the facts of the case, evidence and identification of the petitioner in videos from the scene, arguments from the petitioner's lawyer and the state, and the court's consideration of whether bail should be granted. Ultimately, the court provides a detailed summary of the arguments from both sides and the facts of the case in considering the bail application.
20211117 madras hc order on caste and conversion
The petitioner, who belongs to the Christian Adi-Dravidar community, married a woman who belongs to the Hindu Arunthathiyar community. He applied for an inter-caste marriage certificate to receive benefits but was denied. The court dismissed the petition, finding that conversion of religion does not change one's caste. Since both the petitioner and his wife belonged to Scheduled Castes by birth, they do not qualify for an inter-caste marriage certificate merely due to the petitioner's religious conversion. The purpose of such certificates is to benefit those who intermarry across major caste divisions, not for couples who share the same original caste.
Display pdf (11)
This document is a bail petition order from a court in India. It summarizes a case involving 15 individuals who were arrested and charged with various offenses related to participating in an unauthorized protest that turned violent. The defense argued the individuals were wrongly implicated and the charges were excessive. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the serious nature of the offenses. After reviewing evidence and considering the individuals had been in custody for 15 days, the court granted bail with conditions, finding continued custody was not necessary and the evidence did not fully support the charges.
Delhi hc may 24 bail delhi riots
The document is a court judgment regarding a bail application. It summarizes the following key details:
1) The petitioner sought bail in an FIR for offenses related to rioting and attacking police officers, resulting in one death and injuries.
2) The prosecution argued footage showed the petitioner as part of the mob pelting stones, but the identification was unclear.
3) The petitioner argued he suffered from a mental disorder at the time and a co-accused received bail, but the court said mental state is a trial matter.
4) Considering the unclear identification and time already served, the court granted bail with conditions but made no comment on the case merits.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura registered a suo motu public interest litigation based on press reports of violence that occurred on October 26th in North Tripura, Unakoti, and Sipahijala districts. The Advocate General provided details of cases registered, peace meetings held, and steps taken to maintain law and order. The Court appreciated the state's efforts but directed forming peace committees at sub-divisional and panchayat levels. It also directed the state to provide details of the investigation and compensation to victims. The Court commended the media's role in restoring peace but warned against spread of fake news on social media.
Sc thwaha fasal judgement 28-oct-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard appeals challenging a High Court order granting bail to two individuals accused of terrorist activities. The individuals were accused of being members of a terrorist organization and charged with offenses under India's anti-terrorism laws. The High Court had set aside bail for one accused but confirmed it for the other. The appeals argued that the charges made out a prima facie case that the accused intended to further terrorist activities based on materials seized from them. However, the High Court found that the charge sheet did not show the accused had an intention to encourage or facilitate terrorist acts as required by law. The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant provisions and prior case law on this issue.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
What's hot (20)
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of India
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
Review Petition Criminal in Writ petition Criminal No.136 of 2016 before Su...
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016
Similar to Vijendra kumar v state
Aparna purohit v__state
This document summarizes a court order regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Aparna Purohit, who is Head of India Originals at Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. The application seeks bail in connection with an FIR filed against her for a controversial web series called "Tandav" that was streamed on Amazon Prime Video. The court heard arguments from lawyers for Purohit and the state government. It noted that multiple FIRs have been filed against Purohit in different states for the web series. It considered the applicant's arguments that no offenses were committed but reserved its order.
Salim v state
1. The document details a court order regarding an application filed under Section 156(3) of the CrPC by the complainant Saleem seeking directions for the registration of an FIR for offenses allegedly committed against him.
2. The complainant alleges that in February 2020, during communal riots in Delhi, some neighbors attacked his home with guns, stones, and petrol bombs. He called the police for help but no one arrived.
3. The court examines the complainant's application, the police report, and video evidence. It discusses relevant sections of the CrPC regarding police investigation and registration of FIRs. The court will further examine the matter and issue directions.
Natasha narwal order
The document is a court judgment summarizing the case against Natasha Narwal. Key details:
- Narwal is accused of instigating protests against the CAA/NRC that led to riots in Delhi in February 2020.
- She was part of activist groups including Pinjra Tod and attended meetings where more extreme protests like blocking roads were discussed.
- However, her defense argues she was merely protesting peacefully and not present during any riots or violence. She claims the police evidence is fabricated and she played no role in any conspiracy or riots.
- The court will determine if Narwal qualifies for bail based on the evidence and charges against her under the UAPA anti-terrorism law
bom HC judgment Kudale.pdf
The petitioner filed two writ petitions seeking to quash two FIRs registered against him for alleged offenses of promoting enmity between groups and intentional insult to provoke breach of peace. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner uploaded videos on social media criticizing a Cabinet Minister's speech in a manner that provoked feelings among certain communities. The petitioner argued that the FIRs infringed on his freedom of speech and were politically motivated. The court considered whether offenses under relevant sections were disclosed based on the facts and the law on limitations to free speech. It reserved judgment after hearing arguments from both sides.
Tablighi bom hc dissenting order
This document is a court judgment from the High Court of Bombay regarding three writ petitions filed against criminal charges.
In the summary:
1) The petitioners were facing criminal charges for various offenses related to violating COVID-19 restrictions and visa conditions, but the court found that the evidence did not establish that the foreign nationals brought COVID-19 to India or violated their visas.
2) One judge disagreed with another judge's reasoning that implied the actions against the foreign nationals and Muslims could be an indirect warning to Indian Muslims.
3) The court allowed the petitions and quashed the FIRs and charge sheets, finding that none of the offenses were made out based on the evidence.
Statevs khalidsaifi bailorder
1) The document discusses the bail application of Khalid Saifi who has been charged under various sections related to rioting, criminal conspiracy, and unlawful assembly in connection with the February 2020 riots in Delhi.
2) The prosecution argues that a large conspiracy was behind the riots and that Saifi was in regular contact with other accused individuals. However, the defense contends that Saifi was not present at the crime scene and is being implicated falsely.
3) The judge heard arguments from both sides and considered the chargesheet and case details before reserving the order on Saifi's bail application.
Shahid murder delhi hc order
This document is a court judgment pertaining to bail applications filed by three petitioners - Junaid, Chand Mohd, and Irshad - who have been accused in an FIR related to riots in North East Delhi in February 2020. The court discusses the evidence and arguments presented by the prosecution and the defense. The prosecution argues that eyewitnesses have implicated the petitioners in their statements, and the petitioners' call detail records place them at the scene of the crime. The defense argues that the eyewitness statements are inconsistent and not credible, and the call detail records alone do not prove the petitioners' involvement. The court also notes that a previous bail application by a co-accused in the same FIR was rejected, as the
orissa HC sc st act caste name calling.pdf
The High Court of Orissa partially allowed a criminal revision petition filed by Ajay Pattanaik and Another challenging their cognizance under the SC and ST Act. While the Court found that a prima facie case was made out against the petitioners for other offenses, it held that the offenses under the SC and ST Act were not established as there was no intent to insult or humiliate the witness due to his caste. The Court set aside the cognizance order under the SC and ST Act and directed the lower court to reconsider the process against the petitioners for the other charges.
Bom hc judgment hate speech
The petitioner is seeking to quash an FIR registered against her for a tweet she posted on Twitter on April 14, 2020. In the tweet, the petitioner reposted a video from a religious gathering where one member of the crowd blamed the Prime Minister of India for the Covid-19 outbreak. The police registered an FIR against the petitioner under Section 153A of the IPC for intentionally promoting enmity between religious groups. The petitioner's counsel argued that the tweet did not promote enmity between two religious communities and was merely criticizing the views of one member of the crowd. The counsel also argued that the petitioner was not the creator of the original video and her tweet did not incite violence. The state counsel argued the
Delhi riots bail order feb 16
The document is a bail application order from the High Court of Delhi regarding the bail application of Mohd. Danish in an FIR registered for offenses related to rioting, unlawful assembly, murder, etc. during the February 2020 Delhi riots.
The petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner was falsely implicated and that the disclosure statement attributed to him was fabricated and inadmissible. The prosecution argued that the petitioner was actively involved in the riots based on witness statements and call detail records placing him at the scene. The court examined the medical evidence showing the injuries on the deceased police officer but noted that it was unclear who delivered the fatal blow.
Pb&har hc order, oct 30
The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case where he is accused of sedition and inciting communal disaffection for statements made against the unity and integrity of the nation during a Facebook live video. The court notes that the petitioner has been in custody for over six months, and the trial is unlikely to conclude soon. After reviewing a transcript of the video, the court finds that while abusive language was used against government officials, the statements do not amount to exciting disaffection against the government or inciting religious tensions. The court determines that the petitioner's comments were an expression of dissatisfaction with government policies and handling of the pandemic, which is permissible criticism. Considering the time already served and no other pending cases, the court grants the
Dipika singh rajawat v j&k hc
The document summarizes a court order from the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir regarding a petition challenging an FIR filed against the petitioner for allegedly hurting religious sentiments through a tweet. The court allowed the petitioner to deposit court fees within a week of lockdown lifting. It issued notices to the respondents and heard arguments on whether to stay the investigation. While not passing judgment on the merits of the case, the court directed that the investigation may continue but the final report cannot be filed without the court's permission. The next hearing was scheduled for February 9, 2021.
Supreme Court of India - Judgement on Muzaffarnagar Violence
This document is a summary of a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding communal riots that broke out in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh in September 2013. It summarizes the key details of the case, including:
1) Several writ petitions were filed seeking protection and rehabilitation for victims, as well as compensation, action against offenders, and prevention of future violence.
2) Serious allegations were made regarding the failure of police to provide security, resulting in reported gang rapes of minority community women.
3) The petitions sought directions for security, CBI inquiry, constitution of an SIT to investigate, rehabilitation of victims, registration of FIRs, compensation for victims, action against rape accused,
Bom hc compensation judgement dec 1
1. The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking Rs. 5 lakh compensation each, claiming they were illegally arrested and detained by police for 6 days in a criminal case.
2. Police registered an FIR for assault against the petitioners based on a complaint. The petitioners were arrested on the day the FIR was registered despite it being a bailable offense.
3. The petitioners were released on bail by a magistrate but rearrested and produced before an executive magistrate who ordered interim bonds, resulting in the petitioners' detention for 6 days until bonds could be furnished. The petitioners argued this was illegal.
Devangana kalita order
The document summarizes a court case involving Devangana Kalita appealing the rejection of her bail application. Some key points:
- Kalita was arrested in relation to 4 FIRs regarding protests against the CAA and NRC acts, and has received bail in 3 but remains in custody for the 4th (subject FIR).
- The allegations against her are that as part of protest groups, she instigated violence in Muslim areas of Delhi in February 2020. However, she denies being present at the sites of violence and claims her call/location records will exonerate her.
- Her lawyers argue the charges against her are vague and she poses no flight risk or evidence tampering risk so should be granted bail
Asif iqbal order
This document is a high court judgment regarding an appeal filed by Asif Iqbal Tanha against an order rejecting his bail application in a case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Some key points:
1) Tanha, a student, was arrested for his alleged role in organizing and instigating the riots based on his involvement with the Jamia Coordination Committee.
2) The police allege Tanha was a key conspirator and mastermind behind the riots, and that he mobilized crowds and gave instructions to spread messages inciting violence.
3) Tanha has filed this appeal challenging the rejection of his second bail application. The court discusses the legislative competence to enact the Unlawful Activities
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
Rs bharathi order
This order denies a petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner, a political leader, was charged for offenses under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for remarks made during a political event. While the petitioner argued the remarks were not intended to disrespect judges or members of scheduled castes, the court found the remarks prima facie showed he remarked that people outside of Tamil Nadu are idiots and no one from scheduled castes had become a high court judge in another state until certain political leaders intervened. The court held it is not justified to embark on an inquiry into the reliability of allegations at this stage, and the petitioner must face trial based
Madras hc madurai bench order
This document is a court order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a writ petition filed by the petitioner Santhosh. The petitioner's younger brother Ramesh was taken into police custody and found dead the next day, with the police claiming it was suicide. The petitioner alleged Ramesh was tortured by police and died as a result. The court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted. The court then directed that the investigation be transferred from the local police to the CBCID due to allegations against the local police. The court also issued directions for strict compliance in cases of custodial deaths, such as requiring video recording of full autopsies adhering to established forensic standards.
Similar to Vijendra kumar v state (20)
Supreme Court of India - Judgement on Muzaffarnagar Violence
Supreme Court of India - Judgement on Muzaffarnagar Violence
Recently uploaded
Opinions on EVs: Metro Atlanta Speaks 2023
Presents in chart form results of questions related to electric vehicles from 2023 Metro Atlanta Speaks survey of the Atlanta Regional Commission
CBO’s Outlook for U.S. Fertility Rates: 2024 to 2054
Presentation by Molly Dahl, CBO's Long-Term Analysis Unit Chief, at a conference organized by the National Bureau of Economic Research.
加急办理华威大学毕业证硕士文凭证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【华威大学毕业证硕士文凭证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Land degradation, desertification and drought resilience. UN ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME -WORLD ENVIRONMENT DAY 2024.
PAS PSDF Mop Up Workshop Presentation 2024 .pptx
This is the slide deck of what PAS learnt supporting councils awarded Planning Skills Delivery Funds
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
原版制作(英国Southampton毕业证书)南安普顿大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(英国Southampton毕业证书)南安普顿大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
State crafting: Changes and challenges for managing the public finances
Presentation at Resolution Foundation event putting the public finances into context ahead of the next election.
Border towns and spaces of (in)visibility.pdf
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 39
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".
The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
Donate to charity during this holiday season
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
原版制作(Hope毕业证书)利物浦霍普大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(Hope毕业证书)利物浦霍普大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
AHMR volume 10 number 1 January-April 2024
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
Transit-Oriented Development Study Working Group Meeting
This presentation on TOD best practices and model zoning was shared with the Cuyahoga County TOD working group on June 5, 2024.
Recently uploaded (20)
CBO’s Outlook for U.S. Fertility Rates: 2024 to 2054
CBO’s Outlook for U.S. Fertility Rates: 2024 to 2054
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
State crafting: Changes and challenges for managing the public finances
State crafting: Changes and challenges for managing the public finances
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 39
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 39
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".
United Nations World Oceans Day 2024; June 8th " Awaken new dephts".
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).
Transit-Oriented Development Study Working Group Meeting
Transit-Oriented Development Study Working Group Meeting
Vijendra kumar v state
- 1. 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34577-2020 Date of decision : 26.11.2020 VIJENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present: Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Pardeep Sihmar, Advocate for the complainant. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) Heard through video conferencing. This is a petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.485 dated 13.08.2020 under Sections 153-A, 295-A and 505 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(1)(V) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 registered at Police Station City Hansi, District Hisar. The brief facts relevant to the present case are that the FIR was lodged on the complaint made by one Savita Kajal and Kuldeep Bhukkal wherein it has been alleged that Savita Kajal uploaded a post of Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar on her Facebook ID and VijenderSarsawa(petitioner herein) made insulting and objectionable comments on the post to create disharmony in the society. It is further the allegation that petitioner uses filthy language and makes objectionable comments against females belonging to Scheduled Castes. It is also the allegation that insulting comments have been made by the petitioner against Muslim women. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the ingredients of Section 153 A, 295-A and 505 are not made out in the present case and he has been in custody since 24.09.2020. 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 01-12-2020 12:02:20 :::
- 2. CRM-M-34577-2020 -2- Status report has been filed by way of an affidavit of Vinod Shanker, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, City Hansi, District Hisar wherein it has been stated that the investigation in this case was conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hansi.On 31.08.2020, the petitioner joined investigation and on 22.09.2020 the complainants Savita Kajal and Kuldeep also joined the investigation and the statements were recorded under Section 161 CrPC. The complainants produced photocopy of the derogatory comments posted by the petitioner on Facebook which were taken into possession by the Police vide separate memo. On 24.09.2020, the petitioner again joined investigation and, thereafter, on the basis of sufficient evidence, he was arrested. Along with the status report the photocopies of the screen shots of the various posts as posted by the petitioner on Facebook have also been annexed. A bare perusal of the screen shots of the said posts prima facie reveals that the posts are not only derogatory in nature but are made against particular communities. In fact, the petitioner along with the petition has appended as Annexure P-2 just one of the posts whereas a number of posts as made by the petitioner have been attached with the status report. The Court is refraining itself from commenting on the nature of the posts made by the petitioner herein at this stage. Suffice it to say that freedom of speech does not entitle a person to make derogatory remarks/posts against any community or gender. In view of the above, I do not find this to be a fit case for grant of regular bail. The same is hence, dismissed. It is, however, made clear that any observation made herein shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. November 26, 2020 (ALKA SARIN) kv JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 01-12-2020 12:02:20 :::