Ashish kumar vs state
•
0 likes•163 views
The court document summarizes a bail application hearing for Ashish Kumar, who was arrested for his participation in a tractor rally protest on January 26, 2021 that turned violent. The prosecution argues Kumar participated in the unlawful assembly and damaged property. Kumar's lawyer argues he was falsely implicated and his continued custody serves no purpose. Considering Kumar has been in custody since the incident with no prior record, and there is no evidence he attempted to harm police, the judge grants bail subject to conditions of not contacting witnesses and informing the court of any address changes.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Personal bond allahabad hc
(1) The petitioner, a social activist, filed a writ petition challenging notices issued to 162 farmers in Sitapur district under Section 111 of the CrPC requiring them to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 10 lakh with two sureties for suspected involvement in protests.
(2) The court sought justification from the state for the exorbitant bond amounts without hearings, and the additional advocate general said proceedings against all persons have been dropped based on a fresh police report finding no further peace breach risk.
(3) While disposing of the petition, the court expressed hope the district magistrate and SDMs will be cautious in future to avoid arbitrary, unjust orders against persons.
Baljinder punjab hc final order
An inspector in the Punjab Police, Baljinder Singh, filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in an FIR registered against him for illegally detaining and torturing the complainant, his son, and worker. The High Court dismissed the petition based on a SIT investigation report. The report found that while the complainant was not illegally detained on the date alleged, his son and worker were illegally detained and humiliated in the police station on a different date in the inspector's presence. As the station head, the inspector was still responsible for actions in his station. The court ruled the police actions unacceptable and that the inspector did not deserve discretionary relief.
Crm m 31490-2020_11_12_2020_final_order
The petitioner Rahul Adiwal filed a petition for regular bail in a case where he was accused of assault with a sword along with others. The court notes that the investigation found that the co-accused Aman caused the serious injury, while the complainant accused either Rahul or another co-accused. Given the disputed facts, the long trial delays due to COVID-19, and that the other co-accused received bail, the court granted Rahul regular bail but ordered the police to improve evidence collection in such cases.
Delh hc rakesh kumar v. vijayanta arya
The court found R-3, a police officer, guilty of contempt of court for arresting the petitioner without following proper legal procedures as outlined in a previous Supreme Court case. Specifically, R-3 failed to serve the required notice under section 41A of the Cr.P.C. before arresting the petitioner. While R-3 apologized, the court did not accept the apology as it was not sincere and was only offered as a last resort. As a result, the court sentenced R-3 to one day in simple imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 2,000, and costs of Rs. 15,000 to be paid to the petitioner. However, the sentence will be kept in abeyance for two
Display pdf (11)
This document is a bail petition order from a court in India. It summarizes a case involving 15 individuals who were arrested and charged with various offenses related to participating in an unauthorized protest that turned violent. The defense argued the individuals were wrongly implicated and the charges were excessive. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the serious nature of the offenses. After reviewing evidence and considering the individuals had been in custody for 15 days, the court granted bail with conditions, finding continued custody was not necessary and the evidence did not fully support the charges.
Dipika singh rajawat v j&k hc
The document summarizes a court order from the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir regarding a petition challenging an FIR filed against the petitioner for allegedly hurting religious sentiments through a tweet. The court allowed the petitioner to deposit court fees within a week of lockdown lifting. It issued notices to the respondents and heard arguments on whether to stay the investigation. While not passing judgment on the merits of the case, the court directed that the investigation may continue but the final report cannot be filed without the court's permission. The next hearing was scheduled for February 9, 2021.
Shiv kumar bail order
Shiv Kumar applied for regular bail in a case registered against him under various sections of IPC including rioting, assaulting a public servant, and attempt to murder. The court notes that a co-accused, Naudeep Kaur, was granted bail by the High Court. Considering this, the court grants bail to Shiv Kumar as well on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 100,000 with one surety of the same amount, subject to conditions that he not influence witnesses or leave the country without permission. The order is without prejudice to the merits of the case.
Cal hc bail order july 30
The document is a court order granting anticipatory bail to a reporter, Avishek Dutta Roy, who published a news report and photographs stating that some police personnel were collecting bribes from a truck and that a police vehicle was driving rashly, causing an accident and death. The court noted it is the reporter's fundamental right to publish such news and felt the case was registered to stifle the reporter's voice. Considering the diary indicated the police took cognizance of the report exposing their own personnel's offenses, the court directed an inquiry and for appropriate action to be taken against offenders while granting the reporter anticipatory bail.
Recommended
Personal bond allahabad hc
(1) The petitioner, a social activist, filed a writ petition challenging notices issued to 162 farmers in Sitapur district under Section 111 of the CrPC requiring them to furnish personal bonds of Rs. 10 lakh with two sureties for suspected involvement in protests.
(2) The court sought justification from the state for the exorbitant bond amounts without hearings, and the additional advocate general said proceedings against all persons have been dropped based on a fresh police report finding no further peace breach risk.
(3) While disposing of the petition, the court expressed hope the district magistrate and SDMs will be cautious in future to avoid arbitrary, unjust orders against persons.
Baljinder punjab hc final order
An inspector in the Punjab Police, Baljinder Singh, filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in an FIR registered against him for illegally detaining and torturing the complainant, his son, and worker. The High Court dismissed the petition based on a SIT investigation report. The report found that while the complainant was not illegally detained on the date alleged, his son and worker were illegally detained and humiliated in the police station on a different date in the inspector's presence. As the station head, the inspector was still responsible for actions in his station. The court ruled the police actions unacceptable and that the inspector did not deserve discretionary relief.
Crm m 31490-2020_11_12_2020_final_order
The petitioner Rahul Adiwal filed a petition for regular bail in a case where he was accused of assault with a sword along with others. The court notes that the investigation found that the co-accused Aman caused the serious injury, while the complainant accused either Rahul or another co-accused. Given the disputed facts, the long trial delays due to COVID-19, and that the other co-accused received bail, the court granted Rahul regular bail but ordered the police to improve evidence collection in such cases.
Delh hc rakesh kumar v. vijayanta arya
The court found R-3, a police officer, guilty of contempt of court for arresting the petitioner without following proper legal procedures as outlined in a previous Supreme Court case. Specifically, R-3 failed to serve the required notice under section 41A of the Cr.P.C. before arresting the petitioner. While R-3 apologized, the court did not accept the apology as it was not sincere and was only offered as a last resort. As a result, the court sentenced R-3 to one day in simple imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 2,000, and costs of Rs. 15,000 to be paid to the petitioner. However, the sentence will be kept in abeyance for two
Display pdf (11)
This document is a bail petition order from a court in India. It summarizes a case involving 15 individuals who were arrested and charged with various offenses related to participating in an unauthorized protest that turned violent. The defense argued the individuals were wrongly implicated and the charges were excessive. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the serious nature of the offenses. After reviewing evidence and considering the individuals had been in custody for 15 days, the court granted bail with conditions, finding continued custody was not necessary and the evidence did not fully support the charges.
Dipika singh rajawat v j&k hc
The document summarizes a court order from the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir regarding a petition challenging an FIR filed against the petitioner for allegedly hurting religious sentiments through a tweet. The court allowed the petitioner to deposit court fees within a week of lockdown lifting. It issued notices to the respondents and heard arguments on whether to stay the investigation. While not passing judgment on the merits of the case, the court directed that the investigation may continue but the final report cannot be filed without the court's permission. The next hearing was scheduled for February 9, 2021.
Shiv kumar bail order
Shiv Kumar applied for regular bail in a case registered against him under various sections of IPC including rioting, assaulting a public servant, and attempt to murder. The court notes that a co-accused, Naudeep Kaur, was granted bail by the High Court. Considering this, the court grants bail to Shiv Kumar as well on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 100,000 with one surety of the same amount, subject to conditions that he not influence witnesses or leave the country without permission. The order is without prejudice to the merits of the case.
Cal hc bail order july 30
The document is a court order granting anticipatory bail to a reporter, Avishek Dutta Roy, who published a news report and photographs stating that some police personnel were collecting bribes from a truck and that a police vehicle was driving rashly, causing an accident and death. The court noted it is the reporter's fundamental right to publish such news and felt the case was registered to stifle the reporter's voice. Considering the diary indicated the police took cognizance of the report exposing their own personnel's offenses, the court directed an inquiry and for appropriate action to be taken against offenders while granting the reporter anticipatory bail.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Pn 27 14012021
The Election Commission of India met to discuss reports on the incident where West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee was injured in Nandigram. The Commission decided to:
1) Remove the Director of Security and place him under suspension for failing to protect the Chief Minister.
2) Authorize the Chief Secretary to appoint a new Director of Security.
3) Identify security personnel who failed in their duties and take action against them.
4) Transfer certain officials and appoint new ones in Purba Medinipur district.
Vijendra kumar v state
The document is a court ruling from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana regarding a petition for bail. The petitioner, Vijender Kumar, is accused of making insulting and derogatory comments on social media against scheduled castes, Muslim women, and creating communal disharmony. The court examined evidence including screenshots of the offensive posts. While the defense argued the charges were not made out, the court found the posts were prima facie derogatory and denied bail, noting freedom of speech does not cover insulting remarks against communities or genders.
Telangana hc order june 17 police brutality covid
The court ordered the police to submit injury reports, statements recorded, and updates on departmental inquiries into several incidents. The police counter-affidavit lacked these details and provided questionable explanations for some incidents. The court directed the police to submit the missing information by June 29th and listed the case for further hearing on June 30th.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Assam court sarma fir order
- The complainant filed a petition under Section 156(3) of the CrPC requesting the court to direct the police to register an FIR regarding offenses allegedly committed by the Chief Minister of Assam under Sections 153 and 153A of the IPC.
- The court analyzed the documents submitted by the complainant and relevant case laws. It determined that the information disclosed the commission of a cognizable offense, so it was mandatory for the police to register an FIR.
- The court also determined that sanction was not required at the pre-cognizance stage under Section 156(3) for the offenses alleged or for prosecuting a public servant. Therefore, it allowed the petition and directed the police to register a case and investigate the matter
Guj hc sedition bail aug 3
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
Kerala hc order former mla protest
1) The petitioner, Dominic Presentation, filed a petition in the High Court of Kerala seeking to quash criminal proceedings against him as the 3rd accused in a case of unlawful assembly and obstructing traffic during a protest.
2) The prosecution case is that on June 27, 2016, the petitioner led around 200 workers in a procession in Ernakulam, Kerala in protest against the arrest of two Dalit girls. This allegedly caused obstruction to the public and traffic.
3) The petitioner's counsel argued that the allegations do not disclose any offence, as holding a peaceful protest is a constitutional right. Further, the ingredients to prove unlawful assembly or traffic obstruction under IPC sections cited were not
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Uk hc-van-gujjars-393978
1) A group of Van Gujjar families who are valid permit holders had migrated to Govind Pashu Vihar National Park in Uttarakhand but were not being allowed to enter the park by the Deputy Director.
2) As a result, the families were forced to live in open tents with no shelter or means to survive during the COVID-19 lockdown.
3) The court ruled that the families' living conditions violated their fundamental right to life under the constitution and directed local authorities to provide the families housing, food, water, medicine and fodder until they can be tested for COVID-19 and granted entry to the park if valid permit holders.
Lawweb.in whether second wife of person who died in accident can claim compen...
Whether second wife of person who died in accident can claim compensation? - See more at: http://www.lawweb.in/2015/06/whether-second-wife-of-person-who-died.html?#sthash.WmrDY5ie.dpuf
Sc judgement 02-aug-2021
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
Delhi riots accused bail order dec 11
This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Aarif @ Mota, who has been charged under various sections related to rioting and murder. The prosecution argues that Aarif was part of an unlawful assembly that killed Zakir during communal riots on February 25, 2020. However, the defense argues that it is unlikely a Muslim boy would have joined a riotous mob consisting mainly of Hindus. The eyewitnesses did not clearly describe Aarif's role, and video footage does not show him. As the applicant's involvement in the unlawful assembly and murder is unclear, the court finds that he should be granted bail.
Abha singh v. state of maharashtra, january 29, 2020.
1. The petitioner filed a PIL seeking orders to compel the respondents to comply with the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 (PEMSR Act), including constituting required committees and authorities.
2. The state government respondent filed an affidavit stating the directions sought have been complied with, but the petitioner disputed this, providing details of an FIR where the act was not properly applied.
3. The court allowed the petitioner to file additional affidavits and gave respondents time to file reply affidavits, adjourning further hearing to a later date.
Saleem khan
The Additional Sessions Judge of Shahdara District Court in Delhi dismissed the application of accused Saleem Khan for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Khan argued he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 25, 2020. However, the court noted the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also affirmed it had jurisdiction to hear the case as it had been designated as a Special Court for trial of cases relating to 2020 Delhi riots by orders of the Delhi High Court and Lieutenant Governor of Delhi.
Tasleem ahmed
The court denied the application of accused Tasleem Ahmed for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Tasleem Ahmed had argued that he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 24, 2020. However, the court noted that the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear the case, citing notifications and orders from the Delhi government and High Court designating it as a special court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots.
State_v__Akil_Ahmad___Ors-1.pdf
दिल्ली दंगा मामले में की गई जांच के मूल्यांकन और उसके आधार पर कार्रवाई के लिए मामला पुलिस विभाग को वापस भेज दिया गया है।
cra-d454202109112023finalorder-2-503843.pdf
पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने कड़े गैरकानूनी गतिविधि रोकथाम अधिनियम (UAPA Act) के तहत गिरफ्तार किए गए व्यक्ति को जमानत दे दी। कोर्ट ने यह यह देखते हुए उक्त व्यक्ति को जमानत दी कि पाकिस्तान के साथ संबंधों के आधार पर कथित तौर पर कुछ आतंकवादी कृत्यों को अंजाम देने की योजना बनाने के मामले में प्रथम दृष्टया कोई मामला नहीं बनता है।
More Related Content
What's hot
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Pn 27 14012021
The Election Commission of India met to discuss reports on the incident where West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee was injured in Nandigram. The Commission decided to:
1) Remove the Director of Security and place him under suspension for failing to protect the Chief Minister.
2) Authorize the Chief Secretary to appoint a new Director of Security.
3) Identify security personnel who failed in their duties and take action against them.
4) Transfer certain officials and appoint new ones in Purba Medinipur district.
Vijendra kumar v state
The document is a court ruling from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana regarding a petition for bail. The petitioner, Vijender Kumar, is accused of making insulting and derogatory comments on social media against scheduled castes, Muslim women, and creating communal disharmony. The court examined evidence including screenshots of the offensive posts. While the defense argued the charges were not made out, the court found the posts were prima facie derogatory and denied bail, noting freedom of speech does not cover insulting remarks against communities or genders.
Telangana hc order june 17 police brutality covid
The court ordered the police to submit injury reports, statements recorded, and updates on departmental inquiries into several incidents. The police counter-affidavit lacked these details and provided questionable explanations for some incidents. The court directed the police to submit the missing information by June 29th and listed the case for further hearing on June 30th.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Assam court sarma fir order
- The complainant filed a petition under Section 156(3) of the CrPC requesting the court to direct the police to register an FIR regarding offenses allegedly committed by the Chief Minister of Assam under Sections 153 and 153A of the IPC.
- The court analyzed the documents submitted by the complainant and relevant case laws. It determined that the information disclosed the commission of a cognizable offense, so it was mandatory for the police to register an FIR.
- The court also determined that sanction was not required at the pre-cognizance stage under Section 156(3) for the offenses alleged or for prosecuting a public servant. Therefore, it allowed the petition and directed the police to register a case and investigate the matter
Guj hc sedition bail aug 3
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
Kerala hc order former mla protest
1) The petitioner, Dominic Presentation, filed a petition in the High Court of Kerala seeking to quash criminal proceedings against him as the 3rd accused in a case of unlawful assembly and obstructing traffic during a protest.
2) The prosecution case is that on June 27, 2016, the petitioner led around 200 workers in a procession in Ernakulam, Kerala in protest against the arrest of two Dalit girls. This allegedly caused obstruction to the public and traffic.
3) The petitioner's counsel argued that the allegations do not disclose any offence, as holding a peaceful protest is a constitutional right. Further, the ingredients to prove unlawful assembly or traffic obstruction under IPC sections cited were not
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Uk hc-van-gujjars-393978
1) A group of Van Gujjar families who are valid permit holders had migrated to Govind Pashu Vihar National Park in Uttarakhand but were not being allowed to enter the park by the Deputy Director.
2) As a result, the families were forced to live in open tents with no shelter or means to survive during the COVID-19 lockdown.
3) The court ruled that the families' living conditions violated their fundamental right to life under the constitution and directed local authorities to provide the families housing, food, water, medicine and fodder until they can be tested for COVID-19 and granted entry to the park if valid permit holders.
Lawweb.in whether second wife of person who died in accident can claim compen...
Whether second wife of person who died in accident can claim compensation? - See more at: http://www.lawweb.in/2015/06/whether-second-wife-of-person-who-died.html?#sthash.WmrDY5ie.dpuf
Sc judgement 02-aug-2021
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
Delhi riots accused bail order dec 11
This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Aarif @ Mota, who has been charged under various sections related to rioting and murder. The prosecution argues that Aarif was part of an unlawful assembly that killed Zakir during communal riots on February 25, 2020. However, the defense argues that it is unlikely a Muslim boy would have joined a riotous mob consisting mainly of Hindus. The eyewitnesses did not clearly describe Aarif's role, and video footage does not show him. As the applicant's involvement in the unlawful assembly and murder is unclear, the court finds that he should be granted bail.
Abha singh v. state of maharashtra, january 29, 2020.
1. The petitioner filed a PIL seeking orders to compel the respondents to comply with the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 (PEMSR Act), including constituting required committees and authorities.
2. The state government respondent filed an affidavit stating the directions sought have been complied with, but the petitioner disputed this, providing details of an FIR where the act was not properly applied.
3. The court allowed the petitioner to file additional affidavits and gave respondents time to file reply affidavits, adjourning further hearing to a later date.
Saleem khan
The Additional Sessions Judge of Shahdara District Court in Delhi dismissed the application of accused Saleem Khan for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Khan argued he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 25, 2020. However, the court noted the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also affirmed it had jurisdiction to hear the case as it had been designated as a Special Court for trial of cases relating to 2020 Delhi riots by orders of the Delhi High Court and Lieutenant Governor of Delhi.
Tasleem ahmed
The court denied the application of accused Tasleem Ahmed for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. Tasleem Ahmed had argued that he was entitled to bail as the police had not filed a charge sheet within 90 days of his arrest on June 24, 2020. However, the court noted that the charge sheet was in fact filed on September 16, 2020, within the 90 day period. The court also ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear the case, citing notifications and orders from the Delhi government and High Court designating it as a special court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots.
What's hot (20)
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took place
Lawweb.in whether second wife of person who died in accident can claim compen...
Lawweb.in whether second wife of person who died in accident can claim compen...
Abha singh v. state of maharashtra, january 29, 2020.
Abha singh v. state of maharashtra, january 29, 2020.
Similar to Ashish kumar vs state
State_v__Akil_Ahmad___Ors-1.pdf
दिल्ली दंगा मामले में की गई जांच के मूल्यांकन और उसके आधार पर कार्रवाई के लिए मामला पुलिस विभाग को वापस भेज दिया गया है।
cra-d454202109112023finalorder-2-503843.pdf
पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने कड़े गैरकानूनी गतिविधि रोकथाम अधिनियम (UAPA Act) के तहत गिरफ्तार किए गए व्यक्ति को जमानत दे दी। कोर्ट ने यह यह देखते हुए उक्त व्यक्ति को जमानत दी कि पाकिस्तान के साथ संबंधों के आधार पर कथित तौर पर कुछ आतंकवादी कृत्यों को अंजाम देने की योजना बनाने के मामले में प्रथम दृष्टया कोई मामला नहीं बनता है।
Rambhagat order
This document summarizes a court case involving an individual, Rambhagat Gopal Sharma, who has been charged with hate speech under sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution argues that the accused gave an inflammatory speech at a public gathering targeting a particular religious community, while the defense claims he has been falsely implicated. After examining video evidence and arguments from both sides, the judge denies the accused's bail application, finding that the video and facts indicate the accused was actively promoting religious hatred and enmity. The judge emphasizes balancing individual liberty with societal security and peace.
Pinky chaudhary bail order
This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Bhupender Tomar @ Pinki Chaudhary, who has been charged under several sections of the IPC and other acts related to organizing an inflammatory protest. The defense argues that the accused left the protest site before inflammatory slogans were raised and is no longer required for interrogation. Additionally, several main co-accused have already been granted bail. Considering the accused also left the protest early and is not required for further questioning, the court grants bail to the accused on parity with one of the co-accused, with conditions that he not contact witnesses and remain in the country.
orissa HC sc st act caste name calling.pdf
The High Court of Orissa partially allowed a criminal revision petition filed by Ajay Pattanaik and Another challenging their cognizance under the SC and ST Act. While the Court found that a prima facie case was made out against the petitioners for other offenses, it held that the offenses under the SC and ST Act were not established as there was no intent to insult or humiliate the witness due to his caste. The Court set aside the cognizance order under the SC and ST Act and directed the lower court to reconsider the process against the petitioners for the other charges.
E.mohanammal
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
mohd-shakib-v-state-of-up-application-us-482-no-23143-of-2021-allahabad-high-...
This document is a court order summarizing a case regarding the seizure of a vehicle transporting cows. Key details:
- The applicant's vehicle was seized by police for illegally transporting cows without permission.
- The applicant argued the driver acted without his knowledge. He filed applications for the vehicle's release which were rejected.
- The court must determine if the applicant violated transport laws and if the rejection orders were valid. Relevant laws on cow transport within the state were examined.
- The court will consider if the applicant proved the vehicle was used without his permission or knowledge as he claims.
Rajivgandhi v. The State- Madras hc SCC.pdf
1) The appellant was convicted by the trial court for offenses under the POCSO Act and Section 363 IPC for kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 16-year-old girl.
2) The High Court upheld the conviction under the POCSO Act but acquitted the appellant of the kidnapping charge under Section 363 IPC, finding that the victim had gone voluntarily with the appellant.
3) However, the Court confirmed the conviction under the POCSO Act, noting that the victim's testimony clearly described penetrative sexual assault and the medical evidence supported this, while the appellant failed to dislodge the presumption of guilt under the Act.
Salim v state
1. The document details a court order regarding an application filed under Section 156(3) of the CrPC by the complainant Saleem seeking directions for the registration of an FIR for offenses allegedly committed against him.
2. The complainant alleges that in February 2020, during communal riots in Delhi, some neighbors attacked his home with guns, stones, and petrol bombs. He called the police for help but no one arrived.
3. The court examines the complainant's application, the police report, and video evidence. It discusses relevant sections of the CrPC regarding police investigation and registration of FIRs. The court will further examine the matter and issue directions.
Jkhand hc maulana bail uapa
This document is a court order from the High Court of Jharkhand regarding a bail application. It summarizes the arguments from both sides. The petitioner's lawyer argued that the petitioner was not named in the original FIR and no evidence was found against him during the investigation. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing the petitioner confessed to meetings at his home. However, the court found no material connecting the petitioner to the alleged crimes. Considering he has no criminal record and is a religious leader, the court granted bail with several conditions, including depositing his passport and using only one mobile phone.
Ashwini upadhyay bail order
This document summarizes a bail hearing for Ashwani Upadhyay, who was arrested under several sections of the IPC as well as epidemic disease and disaster management acts. His lawyers argued that he left the site of the alleged offenses before they occurred and is not visible in any videos. The prosecution argued he organized the event and his custody is needed for a thorough investigation. After hearing both sides, the court considered the guidelines on reducing prison overcrowding during the pandemic in deciding whether to grant bail.
Allahabad HC order- Justice Bhanot.pdf
The court document discusses a bail application filed by Nawab, who has been charged with offenses related to a mob violence incident. The court grants bail to Nawab, noting that he does not appear to be a principal offender and has no prior criminal history. Additionally, the court orders Nawab and the informant's counsel to organize a public event distributing cool drinks, to promote peace and harmony between the groups involved in the incident.
Delhi court bail denied
1) The document is a court order from a bail hearing for Dharmendra Singh Harman, who is accused in a case related to the January 2021 farmer protests in Delhi.
2) The prosecution argues that Harman played an active role as an instigator and member of the unlawful assembly, as seen in photos of him sitting atop his car with a flag during the protest.
3) While the defense argues Harman only broke barricades, the court finds the allegations serious as he was part of a mob that took the law into their own hands by diverting from the approved route and breaking barricades at multiple locations before entering the Red Fort area, where police were attacked.
4) Noting
delhi court acquittal delhi riots order.pdf
The document is a court judgment from the Court of Sh. Pulastya Pramachala, Additional Sessions Judge-03, North-East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in the case of State v. Mohd. Shahnawaz @ Shanu etc. involving charges of rioting and arson. Four accused were charged but all were acquitted. The judgment provides details of the charges, evidence presented, and arguments of the prosecution and defense. It finds that the identification of the accused was not proven and acquits all accused persons.
Aparna purohit v__state
This document summarizes a court order regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Aparna Purohit, who is Head of India Originals at Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. The application seeks bail in connection with an FIR filed against her for a controversial web series called "Tandav" that was streamed on Amazon Prime Video. The court heard arguments from lawyers for Purohit and the state government. It noted that multiple FIRs have been filed against Purohit in different states for the web series. It considered the applicant's arguments that no offenses were committed but reserved its order.
Tahir hussain order display_pdf.pdf
1) The case involves State v. Tahir Hussain and others regarding FIR No. 80/20 filed at PS Dayalpur.
2) The court examined the charges and found that only Section 436 IPC (mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house) was triable by sessions court.
3) Upon reviewing the complaint and statement of the sole witness Jai Bhagwan, the court determined that his allegations of losing furniture worth Rs. 35,000 when his loaded vehicle was stopped and articles burnt did not show commission of an offense under Section 436 IPC.
4) Therefore, all accused were discharged for the offense under Section 436 IPC
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
javed-mohammad-pump-vs-state-of-up-criminal-misc-bail-application-no-53834-of...
javed-mohammad-pump-vs-state-of-up-criminal-misc-bail-application-no-53834-of-2022-allahabad-high-court-
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Similar to Ashish kumar vs state (20)
mohd-shakib-v-state-of-up-application-us-482-no-23143-of-2021-allahabad-high-...
mohd-shakib-v-state-of-up-application-us-482-no-23143-of-2021-allahabad-high-...
javed-mohammad-pump-vs-state-of-up-criminal-misc-bail-application-no-53834-of...
javed-mohammad-pump-vs-state-of-up-criminal-misc-bail-application-no-53834-of...
More from ZahidManiyar
Letter to-dgp-18 oct21
1. The families of prisoners held in Taloja Central Prison and Byculla Women's Prison wrote a letter regarding the discontinuation of weekly telephone interviews for family members when physical visits resume.
2. They expressed concern that discontinuing phone calls would cause problems for out-of-town family members who cannot easily travel to Mumbai for physical visits, as well as economically weak and elderly relatives.
3. The letter requested that phone interviews be allowed to continue in a hybrid model, where Mumbai-based relatives could choose a physical or phone visit, to ensure prisoners' right to communicate with family and advocates as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura issued an order directing the State of Tripura Aids Control Society to be impleaded as a respondent. The State and Union of India were directed to issue guidelines to conduct a thorough research of all persons in State prisons to ascertain if any are infected with HIV. If any infected persons are found, necessary action must be taken for their treatment and care in accordance with law to prevent an epidemic. A report on the matter must be submitted to the court by November 9, 2021. The court also requested an Amicus Curiae to assist and oversee the matter.
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
This document summarizes an incident of communal violence and vigilantism in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. It discusses the history of communal tensions and riots in Meerut dating back to the 1930s. On September 20, 2017, two members of the Jehovah's Witnesses religious group were invited into a Hindu man's home but then detained against their will for over an hour, assaulted, and handed over to the police with false allegations of forced conversion efforts. The police refused to register a complaint about the assault and illegally detained the victims overnight without medical treatment. The document analyzes this incident as an example of the shift in India to smaller scale vigilantism targeting religious minorities, with the tacit support
Christians under attack_in_india_report
The document provides a summary of attacks on Christians in India, including two specific incidents in Roorkee and Mau, Uttar Pradesh:
1) In Roorkee, a mob of 250-300 people attacked a church, injuring several attendees. Police did not provide security despite prior complaints.
2) In Mau, a mob accused Christians of conversion during a prayer meeting. Seven people including the pastor were arrested under anti-conversion laws.
It also lists other incidents of threats, violence and false accusations against Christians in various parts of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and other states, indicating growing targeted attacks against the Christian minority in India.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses an application for bail filed by Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. While the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the judge found the evidence linking Imam's speeches to subsequent acts of violence by co-accused to be scanty and inconclusive. The judge granted Imam bail for offenses related to inciting violence but will further examine charges of sedition against Imam.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. It notes that while the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the defense argues there is no evidence linking Imam's words to any criminal acts. In its ruling, the court finds the evidence against Imam for abetting offenses to be insufficient and scanty.
Ramesh kumar order
This document summarizes a court case revision petition hearing. The judge stayed the operation of the previous court order from October 12, 2021 until the next hearing date of November 12, 2021. The revision petition notice was ordered to be issued to the respondents. The trial court record was reviewed and the special public prosecutor and police inspector were present to provide submissions.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
Archbishop --press-statement
The Archbishop of Bangalore expresses concern over the Karnataka government's plan to survey Christian missionaries and places of worship. He argues that such surveys could unfairly target and endanger the Christian community. The Archbishop questions why only Christians are being surveyed, noting that Christians constitute a small percentage of the population. He calls on the government to respect constitutional protections of religious freedom and consider the educational and social services provided by Christian institutions instead of pursuing anti-conversion policies.
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
The complaint alleges that a Muslim family in Indore, Madhya Pradesh was attacked by a mob of 150 people associated with the RSS on October 9, 2021. The family was threatened and told to leave the village. Family members sustained head injuries and their house was ransacked. The police delayed registering an FIR and instead filed a counter-complaint against the family. The complaint cites other recent incidents of violence and harassment against Muslims in Indore and calls on the National Commission for Minorities to investigate and take action to prevent further attacks.
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
The complaint alleges that on October 10, 2021 in Mau, Uttar Pradesh, two incidents occurred where Christian religious gatherings were disrupted by Hindu nationalist mobs. In one incident, two nuns were attacked, dragged to the police station and detained for hours on baseless allegations of religious conversion. In another incident, a Christian prayer service was raided and the pastor and congregants were taken to the police station. The complaint urges the National Commission for Minorities to investigate these attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and pressure authorities to take swift action. It notes a pattern of increasing attacks on Christians in India by Hindu nationalist groups.
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
1. Citizens for Justice and Peace wrote to the National Commission for Minorities regarding two attacks on Christians in Mau, Uttar Pradesh on October 10, 2021. In the first incident, a mob attacked two nuns and their driver at a bus stand and took them to the police station. In the second incident, a mob disrupted a Christian prayer service and took the pastor and worshippers to the police station.
2. The letter requests that the Commission conduct an inquiry into the attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and urge police to take action, and issue guidelines for dealing with communally motivated attacks. It argues that such attacks violate constitutional rights and aim to subjugate minority communities through fear.
Aiufwp eia response (1) converted
The document is a response letter from the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP) regarding the draft EIA Notification 2020. The key points made in the letter are:
1) The AIUFWP demands a complete withdrawal of the draft EIA Notification 2020 as it weakens environmental protections and public participation in decision making.
2) The draft was released during a national lockdown without proper accessibility or consideration of forest communities who will be most impacted.
3) Weakening environmental regulations could exacerbate future pandemics by further damaging nature.
4) The draft favors industries and projects over environmental protection by reducing scrutiny and exempting many from public hearings and consent requirements.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Kerala hc order d rajagopal-v-ayyappan-anr-402210
This document summarizes two criminal revision petitions filed in the High Court of Kerala against judgments from lower courts. The lower courts had found police officers guilty of assaulting a complainant while he was in custody. The police officers argue on appeal that the lower courts erred in not requiring sanction from the state government before prosecuting public servants. The High Court examines the evidence and finds that the injuries occurred while the complainant was in police custody, supporting his allegation that police assaulted him at the police station lockup. Medical evidence also supports the complainant's version of events. The High Court dismisses the criminal revision petitions filed by the police officers.
Kpss security of kp's - 05.10.2021
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti (KPSS) wrote a letter to the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir regarding the security of non-migrant Kashmiri Pandits and Hindus living in the Kashmir Valley. KPSS has submitted communications over the past year requesting a meeting about this issue, but their requests have been ignored. Over the past 10 days, intelligence reports indicate prominent Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu businessmen will be targeted, and one was killed on October 5th. KPSS warns that if another Pandit/Hindu is killed due to administrative and security failures, they will file a petition with the International Human Rights Commission and launch a signature campaign against the administration for neglect
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
The Central Trade Unions strongly condemned the killing of farmers protesting in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh. They demanded the resignation of the Minister of State for Home and stringent punishment for the culprits. The trade unions also condemned the police for preventing opposition leaders and union leaders from visiting the families of the deceased. They reiterated their support for farmers in their struggle against the farm laws.
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 1585 2021
This document summarizes a court order from a Public Interest Litigation case in the State of Uttar Pradesh, India. The order lists several related cases to be heard together on October 22nd. It notes that two specific cases were not listed as directed in a previous order and threatens action against the responsible registry officer. It also directs the respondents to provide the petitioner's counsel a copy of the counter affidavit filed in connected writ petitions.
Mp hc wp 9320 2021_order_30-sep-2021
The document discusses two writ petitions related to prison overcrowding and conditions in Madhya Pradesh. It summarizes the suggestions provided by an amicus curiae to improve prison conditions, which include establishing women's prisons, borstal schools for youth offenders, mental health services, vocational training programs, healthcare facilities, sanitation infrastructure, educational opportunities, and recreational activities for inmates. The court acknowledges the urgent need for prison reforms and decongesting the prisons in the state.
More from ZahidManiyar (20)
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Recently uploaded
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
भारत सरकार द्वारा बड़े पैमाने पर व्हाट्सएप अभियान चलाए जाने से डेटा गोपनीयता, नैतिकता और चुनावों की निष्पक्षता पर सवाल उठते हैं।
Recently uploaded (9)
Ashish kumar vs state
- 1. IN THE COURT OF SH. AMITABH RAWAT, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-03, SHAHDARA DISTRICT, KKD COURT, DELHI Bail Application No. 480/2021 FIR No. 41/2021 PS-Seema Puri U/S.307/147/148/149/186/332/353/188/427/269/270 IPC r/w Section 03 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, r/w Section 51(b) of Management Act 2005 r/w Section 3 of Epidemic Disease Act, 1897 State Vs. Ashish Kumar (Farmer Riots Case) 01.03.2021 Present: Sh. Vikas Kumar, Ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused Ashish Kumar. IO/Inspector Prashant Anand with case file. Arguments have been heard again. Record perused. The case of the prosecution is that the applicant participated in Tractor rally organized on 26.01.2021 alongwith others. It is urged that the unlawful assembly on 26.01.2021 indulged in violence, damaged public property and attempted to run over the police personnel with tractors. It is argued by the ld. Counsel for the applicant/accused that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter and he has been in judicial custody since 26.01.2021. It is further argued that no purpose would be served by keeping the applicant/accused in custody. Benefit of bail is requested. Ld. Addl. PP for State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the applicant/accused on the ground that offences against the applicant/accused are serious in nature. Submissions heard. The ground of bail calls for balancing the paramount right of the individual i.e. right to liberty on one hand and right of the investigating agency to investigate. As per the case of the prosecution on 26.01.2021 applicant was FIR No. 41/2021 PS-Seemapuri State Vs. Ashish Kumar page no.1/2
- 2. detained at Chintamani Chowk since at around 12.50 pm around 500 protesters on tractors rally and cars were coming from Apsara Border flyover and they had broken the barricade in the violent manner. People driving tractors had tried to run over the police personnel. However, there is no specific role assigned to the accused in as much as the accused himself is not alleged to have attempted to kill or hurt the police personnel deployed in law and arrangement duty. The best case of the prosecution is that he had participated in the said rally/unlawful assembly on 26.01.2021 at the relevant time thereby attracting imputation u/s. 149 IPC. The applicant/accused was driving in his Scorpio Car and the same has been seized from the place of incident in damaged condition. The accused is in custody since 26.01.2021 and no purpose will be served by keeping him in custody any further. There is no previous record of the accused nor there are any chances of him tampering with the evidence. Considering all the facts and circumstances, I admit the accused Ashish Kumar to bail subject to furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Ld. MM/Link MM/Duty MM subject to the following conditions: (a) The accused shall not contact the witnesses in the present case or try to influence any witness of this case. (b) Applicant and surety shall inform the court immediately on change in residential addresses. Application is disposed off accordingly. Let copy of this order be sent to Ld. Counsel for the accused, Special Prosecutor, IO/SHO/DCP concerned for information. (AMITABH RAWAT) Addl. Sessions Judge-03, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Dated: 01.03.2021. FIR No. 41/2021 PS-Seemapuri State Vs. Ashish Kumar page no.2/2