Gauhati hc
•
0 likes•2,530 views
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention. 2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount. 3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Patna hc order (1)
This document summarizes three petitions heard by the Patna High Court regarding the right to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bihar, India. It discusses the constitutional right to health and life under Article 21 and the state's duty to provide medical infrastructure and treatment. It notes the massive surge in COVID cases in Bihar in 2021 and orders the state to take steps to improve oxygen supply and healthcare infrastructure to treat patients.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Scr.a88942020 gjhc240605762020 5_26082021
1) The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police externig him from several districts for one year.
2) The High Court stayed the execution of the externment order citing issues with it.
3) In its final order, the High Court quashed the externment order, finding that the order relied on two FIRs not mentioned in the notice given to the petitioner and that one of the FIRs mentioned in the notice was for demonstrating against a government policy wherein citizens have a right to raise grievances. The Court also noted inconsistencies in the responses by the authorities.
Sc order sept 30
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Yash Pal Singh, whose son was killed in an alleged encounter by police officers in 2002. The court noted that the case has been pending since then, and the police officers involved have not been properly investigated or prosecuted despite court orders. The court criticized the laxity of the state in defending its police officers. It directed the state of Uttar Pradesh to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs as interim costs to the petitioner, as he has been denied justice for 19 years. The matter was listed for further hearing on October 20th.
Recommended
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Patna hc order (1)
This document summarizes three petitions heard by the Patna High Court regarding the right to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bihar, India. It discusses the constitutional right to health and life under Article 21 and the state's duty to provide medical infrastructure and treatment. It notes the massive surge in COVID cases in Bihar in 2021 and orders the state to take steps to improve oxygen supply and healthcare infrastructure to treat patients.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Scr.a88942020 gjhc240605762020 5_26082021
1) The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police externig him from several districts for one year.
2) The High Court stayed the execution of the externment order citing issues with it.
3) In its final order, the High Court quashed the externment order, finding that the order relied on two FIRs not mentioned in the notice given to the petitioner and that one of the FIRs mentioned in the notice was for demonstrating against a government policy wherein citizens have a right to raise grievances. The Court also noted inconsistencies in the responses by the authorities.
Sc order sept 30
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Yash Pal Singh, whose son was killed in an alleged encounter by police officers in 2002. The court noted that the case has been pending since then, and the police officers involved have not been properly investigated or prosecuted despite court orders. The court criticized the laxity of the state in defending its police officers. It directed the state of Uttar Pradesh to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs as interim costs to the petitioner, as he has been denied justice for 19 years. The matter was listed for further hearing on October 20th.
Kush kalra sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard several petitions related to women's participation and recruitment in the Indian military. For one of the petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within a week and listed the matter for further hearing on September 8th. For another petition regarding a stay, the Court issued an interim order allowing women candidates to take an upcoming examination subject to the Court's further orders. The Court also directed the Union Public Service Commission to publicize the interim orders widely. The Court listed several related matters regarding women's participation in Sainik Schools and the Rashtriya Indian Military College for hearing on September 8th as well.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
Sc thwaha fasal judgement 28-oct-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard appeals challenging a High Court order granting bail to two individuals accused of terrorist activities. The individuals were accused of being members of a terrorist organization and charged with offenses under India's anti-terrorism laws. The High Court had set aside bail for one accused but confirmed it for the other. The appeals argued that the charges made out a prima facie case that the accused intended to further terrorist activities based on materials seized from them. However, the High Court found that the charge sheet did not show the accused had an intention to encourage or facilitate terrorist acts as required by law. The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant provisions and prior case law on this issue.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwaj
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted by the state government had jurisdiction in such cases.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the detention extension and cognizance orders passed by the judge without jurisdiction were null and void, and that she was entitled to default bail.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
Display pdf (11)
This document is a bail petition order from a court in India. It summarizes a case involving 15 individuals who were arrested and charged with various offenses related to participating in an unauthorized protest that turned violent. The defense argued the individuals were wrongly implicated and the charges were excessive. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the serious nature of the offenses. After reviewing evidence and considering the individuals had been in custody for 15 days, the court granted bail with conditions, finding continued custody was not necessary and the evidence did not fully support the charges.
Sterlite plant order hc
The court reviewed a report submitted by the National Human Rights Commission regarding protests in which firing occurred against unarmed citizens. The court requested that copies of the report be provided to relevant parties. The court also noted recommendations in the report, including dropping cases against protesters and providing increased compensation to families of victims and injured persons. The court requested that the state consider the recommendations, provide counseling to families, and ensure a speedy and meaningful investigation into the firing incidents. The court further requested that the National Human Rights Commission conclude its pending investigation into the matter within the next four weeks and provide an update to the court.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Bom hc apr 8 pocso order
The petitioner, a social worker dealing with child abuse cases, has filed a public interest litigation arguing that Section 40 of the POCSO Act and Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules, which provide for participation of victims in legal proceedings, are not being properly implemented. The petitioner contends that victims and their families are often not informed about bail applications and other matters in criminal cases under the POCSO Act. The petitioner seeks guidelines to ensure strict compliance of the victim participation provisions, and for Section 439(1-A) of the CrPC relating to informing victims about bail hearings to also apply to POCSO Act cases.
Kerala hc apr 28
The High Court of Kerala recalled three previous orders granting petitions to quash criminal cases relating to offenses of rape and under the POCSO Act. In recalling the orders, the Court noted it had failed to consider binding Supreme Court precedents holding that cases involving offenses like rape cannot be quashed solely due to settlements between the parties. While the petitioners argued the Court could not recall signed orders, the Court held this was not a review but rather pointing out a legal omission. The cases will be reheard in detail after the summer vacation.
Up hc order
1) The document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Prateek Jain who is accused in a criminal case of fraud and cheating.
2) The court notes that due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the hearing is being conducted virtually. It also discusses the provisions around anticipatory bail applications in the CrPC.
3) In its order, the court considers the arguments made by the defense and prosecution and ultimately decides to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant while imposing certain conditions.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Mp hc wp 9799 2021_final_order_28-jul-2021
1. The petitioner challenged his detention order under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.
2. The petitioner was running a business and an FIR was registered against him for illegally stocking and selling oxygen cylinders without a license. A raid found 571 jumbo and 90 small oxygen cylinders in his warehouse.
3. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority failed to consider that he was already in custody at the time the detention order was passed and his potential release on bail, which is required. The court found no mention of the petitioner's custody in the detention order.
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
Guj hc pasa order
1. The petitioner filed this application to prevent his detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA) in connection with a criminal case registered against him for offenses related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and assault.
2. The court noted that the dispute appeared to be private in nature rather than dangerous, and seemed to be an attempt to use threats under PASA to settle a financial dispute.
3. The court therefore allowed the petition and directed that any detention order against the petitioner related to this case cannot be executed for one month, to prevent his detention under PASA which did not appear justified based on the nature of the allegations.
Guj hc order pasa aug 23
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
Allahabad hc nsa order
This document summarizes three connected habeas corpus petitions filed by Parvez, Irfan, and Rahamtullah challenging their detention under the National Security Act, 1980. According to the document:
- Parvez, Irfan, and Rahamtullah were arrested for allegedly cutting and selling beef in violation of cow slaughter laws, which disturbed public order.
- The District Magistrate of Sitapur ordered their detention under the National Security Act, citing the likelihood they would be released on bail and continue disturbing public order related to cow slaughter issues.
- The petitioners argue there was no evidence they would threaten public order and their detention violated their fundamental rights. They have petitioned for their release and to qu
Bombay hc order (1)
This document is a high court order regarding a writ petition filed by three widows seeking compensation for the death of their husbands who were manual scavengers. The court notes that manual scavenging is prohibited by law and those engaged in it are entitled to rehabilitation. It discusses the relevant laws and state government policies on compensation. While the state argues the developer and contractor should pay, the court observes the state also holds responsibility. It directs the government lawyer to immediately pay interim compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 to each petitioner, while holding all respondents including the housing society responsible for fully paying the mandated Rs. 10 lakhs compensation per petitioner.
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of up
This document discusses two bail applications that involve the same legal question regarding an accused's right to personal liberty under Article 21 if the prosecution fails to file a charge sheet within the statutory period under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It summarizes the arguments from the applicants' counsel that their right to default bail arose when the limitation period expired but was denied due to the lockdown. It also summarizes the state's arguments and examines previous court precedents on when the right to default bail arises and can be extinguished. The judge reviews reports on the remand procedures followed during the lockdown period and observes that the accused's right to personal liberty was not properly dealt with per established law.
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Registration and de-registration of Fundamental Right case after 1 year by Supreme Court of India wherein one petitioner has succumbed to suspicious death under illegal lock up since 2011 another one is the next target of corrupt law enforcement agencies.
More Related Content
What's hot
Kush kalra sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard several petitions related to women's participation and recruitment in the Indian military. For one of the petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within a week and listed the matter for further hearing on September 8th. For another petition regarding a stay, the Court issued an interim order allowing women candidates to take an upcoming examination subject to the Court's further orders. The Court also directed the Union Public Service Commission to publicize the interim orders widely. The Court listed several related matters regarding women's participation in Sainik Schools and the Rashtriya Indian Military College for hearing on September 8th as well.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
Sc thwaha fasal judgement 28-oct-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard appeals challenging a High Court order granting bail to two individuals accused of terrorist activities. The individuals were accused of being members of a terrorist organization and charged with offenses under India's anti-terrorism laws. The High Court had set aside bail for one accused but confirmed it for the other. The appeals argued that the charges made out a prima facie case that the accused intended to further terrorist activities based on materials seized from them. However, the High Court found that the charge sheet did not show the accused had an intention to encourage or facilitate terrorist acts as required by law. The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant provisions and prior case law on this issue.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwaj
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted by the state government had jurisdiction in such cases.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the detention extension and cognizance orders passed by the judge without jurisdiction were null and void, and that she was entitled to default bail.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
Display pdf (11)
This document is a bail petition order from a court in India. It summarizes a case involving 15 individuals who were arrested and charged with various offenses related to participating in an unauthorized protest that turned violent. The defense argued the individuals were wrongly implicated and the charges were excessive. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the serious nature of the offenses. After reviewing evidence and considering the individuals had been in custody for 15 days, the court granted bail with conditions, finding continued custody was not necessary and the evidence did not fully support the charges.
Sterlite plant order hc
The court reviewed a report submitted by the National Human Rights Commission regarding protests in which firing occurred against unarmed citizens. The court requested that copies of the report be provided to relevant parties. The court also noted recommendations in the report, including dropping cases against protesters and providing increased compensation to families of victims and injured persons. The court requested that the state consider the recommendations, provide counseling to families, and ensure a speedy and meaningful investigation into the firing incidents. The court further requested that the National Human Rights Commission conclude its pending investigation into the matter within the next four weeks and provide an update to the court.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Bom hc apr 8 pocso order
The petitioner, a social worker dealing with child abuse cases, has filed a public interest litigation arguing that Section 40 of the POCSO Act and Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules, which provide for participation of victims in legal proceedings, are not being properly implemented. The petitioner contends that victims and their families are often not informed about bail applications and other matters in criminal cases under the POCSO Act. The petitioner seeks guidelines to ensure strict compliance of the victim participation provisions, and for Section 439(1-A) of the CrPC relating to informing victims about bail hearings to also apply to POCSO Act cases.
Kerala hc apr 28
The High Court of Kerala recalled three previous orders granting petitions to quash criminal cases relating to offenses of rape and under the POCSO Act. In recalling the orders, the Court noted it had failed to consider binding Supreme Court precedents holding that cases involving offenses like rape cannot be quashed solely due to settlements between the parties. While the petitioners argued the Court could not recall signed orders, the Court held this was not a review but rather pointing out a legal omission. The cases will be reheard in detail after the summer vacation.
Up hc order
1) The document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Prateek Jain who is accused in a criminal case of fraud and cheating.
2) The court notes that due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the hearing is being conducted virtually. It also discusses the provisions around anticipatory bail applications in the CrPC.
3) In its order, the court considers the arguments made by the defense and prosecution and ultimately decides to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant while imposing certain conditions.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Mp hc wp 9799 2021_final_order_28-jul-2021
1. The petitioner challenged his detention order under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.
2. The petitioner was running a business and an FIR was registered against him for illegally stocking and selling oxygen cylinders without a license. A raid found 571 jumbo and 90 small oxygen cylinders in his warehouse.
3. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority failed to consider that he was already in custody at the time the detention order was passed and his potential release on bail, which is required. The court found no mention of the petitioner's custody in the detention order.
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
Guj hc pasa order
1. The petitioner filed this application to prevent his detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA) in connection with a criminal case registered against him for offenses related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and assault.
2. The court noted that the dispute appeared to be private in nature rather than dangerous, and seemed to be an attempt to use threats under PASA to settle a financial dispute.
3. The court therefore allowed the petition and directed that any detention order against the petitioner related to this case cannot be executed for one month, to prevent his detention under PASA which did not appear justified based on the nature of the allegations.
Guj hc order pasa aug 23
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
Allahabad hc nsa order
This document summarizes three connected habeas corpus petitions filed by Parvez, Irfan, and Rahamtullah challenging their detention under the National Security Act, 1980. According to the document:
- Parvez, Irfan, and Rahamtullah were arrested for allegedly cutting and selling beef in violation of cow slaughter laws, which disturbed public order.
- The District Magistrate of Sitapur ordered their detention under the National Security Act, citing the likelihood they would be released on bail and continue disturbing public order related to cow slaughter issues.
- The petitioners argue there was no evidence they would threaten public order and their detention violated their fundamental rights. They have petitioned for their release and to qu
Bombay hc order (1)
This document is a high court order regarding a writ petition filed by three widows seeking compensation for the death of their husbands who were manual scavengers. The court notes that manual scavenging is prohibited by law and those engaged in it are entitled to rehabilitation. It discusses the relevant laws and state government policies on compensation. While the state argues the developer and contractor should pay, the court observes the state also holds responsibility. It directs the government lawyer to immediately pay interim compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 to each petitioner, while holding all respondents including the housing society responsible for fully paying the mandated Rs. 10 lakhs compensation per petitioner.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Gauhati hc
Abhishek, sanjeev v state of up
This document discusses two bail applications that involve the same legal question regarding an accused's right to personal liberty under Article 21 if the prosecution fails to file a charge sheet within the statutory period under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It summarizes the arguments from the applicants' counsel that their right to default bail arose when the limitation period expired but was denied due to the lockdown. It also summarizes the state's arguments and examines previous court precedents on when the right to default bail arises and can be extinguished. The judge reviews reports on the remand procedures followed during the lockdown period and observes that the accused's right to personal liberty was not properly dealt with per established law.
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Registration and de-registration of Fundamental Right case after 1 year by Supreme Court of India wherein one petitioner has succumbed to suspicious death under illegal lock up since 2011 another one is the next target of corrupt law enforcement agencies.
Madras hc jan 21 order
1) The petitioner, M. Ananthan, was arrested in 2018 for drug offenses involving commercial quantities of ganja and has been in judicial custody since.
2) While the petitioner satisfies one requirement for bail under the NDPS Act by not having a criminal record, the court found he did not satisfy the second requirement that he is not likely to have committed the offense based on evidence.
3) However, the court determined the petitioner's right to a speedy trial had been violated as the trial had not commenced for over two years. As such, the court directed the prosecution to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and for the trial to conclude within three months.
Allahabad hc tablighi order
The court heard a bail application for 7 Bangladeshi nationals who were arrested for violating laws during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court granted interim bail to 5 applicants and held the 6th applicant's request pending extension of their expired visa. Strict conditions were imposed, including adherence to visa terms and regular reporting. The Ministry of External Affairs was directed to facilitate the applicants' participation in their trial and discuss their cases with Bangladesh to possibly decide the matter without trial.
Allahabad hc tablighi order
The court heard a bail application for 7 Bangladeshi nationals who were arrested for violating laws during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court granted interim bail to 5 applicants and held the 6th applicant's request pending extension of their expired visa. Strict conditions were imposed, including residing at their visa address, not seeking trial adjournments, and surrendering before visa expiration. The Ministry of External Affairs was directed to assist in securing the applicants' participation in their trial before their visas expire.
AP HC Order.pdf
This document is a judgment from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh regarding four writ petitions filed challenging the validity of an order issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh. The order amended rules related to leasing and licensing of shops and premises belonging to Hindu religious institutions. The petitioners argued the order discriminated against non-Hindus and violated their fundamental rights. The court examined the arguments and referred to several previous cases in its judgment.
10983 2020 36_1502_22526_judgement_12-jun-2020
This document summarizes several writ petitions filed in the Supreme Court of India challenging orders issued under the Disaster Management Act during the COVID-19 lockdown directing employers to make full wage payments. The petitioners argue the orders violate constitutional rights and will bankrupt businesses. Intervenors supporting the orders argue wages are a pre-existing right and the orders help protect livelihoods. The court considers arguments on both sides and notes the central government has since withdrawn the challenged orders.
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
The court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal to pass a reasoned order after reviewing the records of two previous cases regarding the petitioner's citizenship status. An earlier opinion declaring the petitioner not a foreigner lacked reasons and was therefore not a valid basis for the principle of res judicata to apply. However, in the interest of justice, the court ordered the Tribunal to consider materials from both previous cases and issue a new reasoned ruling, while no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner until then. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
June 12 order
This document summarizes the proceedings of a hearing in the High Court of Bombay regarding two petitions related to prison conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It notes the concerns raised by the petitioners' lawyer and issues directions to address them. It directs prison authorities to test asymptomatic inmates according to ICMR guidelines, consider extending visitation benefits, and calls for reports on pending temporary bail applications to be expedited in light of Supreme Court recommendations.
Hc order
The court hearing addressed a writ petition regarding a public notice issued by the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks extending deadlines for intellectual property applications during the COVID-19 lockdown. The court ruled that the public notice was contrary to a Supreme Court order by setting the limitation period start date as March 25th instead of March 15th. It also found the notice set an unreasonable deadline of May 18th for filings. As a result, the court suspended the public notice and clarified the respondents must follow the Supreme Court order to protect limitation periods starting from March 15th.
8284 of 2019 gauhati hc
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a petition filed by Rahima Khatun challenging an ex-parte order from the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her an illegal migrant. The High Court remanded the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration of Rahima Khatun's citizenship status, after hearing from her. It also directed Rahima Khatun to appear before the Superintendent of Police within 15 days to provide information and furnish a bail bond, and not leave the district without permission. The records were then remitted back to the Foreigners Tribunal for further proceedings.
Sc order freedom of rel act
The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal of George Mangalapilly challenging his prosecution under Sections 153(B)(1), 295-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the M.P. Freedom of Religion Act. The key witness in the case, Dharmendar Dohar, denied in his testimony that he was forcibly converted and said the appellant did not contact him. Given that the prosecution's entire case rested on this witness, and his testimony did not support the charges, the Court quashed the proceedings against the appellant.
Cal hc bail order july 30
The document is a court order granting anticipatory bail to a reporter, Avishek Dutta Roy, who published a news report and photographs stating that some police personnel were collecting bribes from a truck and that a police vehicle was driving rashly, causing an accident and death. The court noted it is the reporter's fundamental right to publish such news and felt the case was registered to stifle the reporter's voice. Considering the diary indicated the police took cognizance of the report exposing their own personnel's offenses, the court directed an inquiry and for appropriate action to be taken against offenders while granting the reporter anticipatory bail.
Shahpur stone pelting bail order june 26
The document is a court order from the High Court of Gujarat regarding applications for regular bail filed by three individuals in connection with an FIR registered for various offenses. The court heard arguments from both sides. It observed that no specific role was attributed to the applicants in the FIR. Further, no police personnel were seriously injured. Considering these facts, the court exercised its discretion and granted the applicants regular bail on executing personal bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with one surety of the same amount, along with various conditions for bail.
Allahabad hc order dec 7
The court document discusses a criminal case of Vinod Baruaar, whose name was incorrectly recorded as "Vinod Baruaar" instead of "Vinod Kumar Baruaar" in court documents. As a result, the jail authorities refused to release Vinod in accordance with a previous bail order from April 2020. The court rejects the request to correct the name, stating that the small discrepancy should not prevent the order from being carried out. The court orders Vinod to be immediately released under the April 2020 bail order within 24 hours, and for the jail superintendent to explain why disciplinary action should not be taken for failing to comply with the court's order.
Gulfisha fatima
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter as per notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no case for relief under Section 167(2) is made out.
Gulfisha bail order
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter based on notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and Delhi High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no grounds for it exist.
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
1) The appellant company appealed an adjudication order that imposed penalties for alleged violations of FEMA regulations regarding the repatriation of foreign exchange.
2) The appellant had remitted $433,661.76 in advance to a Chinese supplier that later went bankrupt without notice. The RBI subsequently granted an exemption relieving the requirement to submit import documents.
3) The adjudicating authority still found a violation, but the appellant argued the RBI exemption eliminated any contravention, and precedent supported their view. The tribunal agreed and overturned the penalties.
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Uttam Chakraborty challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring him a foreigner. The order issues notice to the respondents and accepts their representation. It also orders that the petitioner not be arrested or deported in the meantime, but must appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond. The petitioner must also provide biometric data and not leave the district without permission. The matter is listed for admission hearing after receiving the lower court records.
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Uttam Chakraborty challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring him a foreigner. The order issues notice to the respondents and accepts their representation. It also orders that the petitioner not be arrested or deported in the meantime, but must appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond. The petitioner must also provide biometric data and not leave the district without permission. The matter is listed for admission hearing after receiving the lower court records.
Similar to Gauhati hc (20)
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of India
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
Judgment - Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
Recently uploaded
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
असंगत न्यायालयी फैसलों के कारण भारत में महिलाओं को सुरक्षित गर्भपात के लिए एक भ्रामक और अनुचित कानूनी लड़ाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Recently uploaded (20)
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Gauhati hc
- 1. Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010188832019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6056/2019 SAMSUL HOQUE S/O- AMZAD ALI @ AMZAT ALI, VILL- KARAITARI, P.S- FAKIRGRAM, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, BTAD, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIAAND 5 ORS REP. BY ITS SECRETARY OF THE MIN OF HOME AFFAIRS, UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI- 01 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 06 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REP. BY THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI- 01 4:THE STATE COORDINATOR NRC ASSAM 1ST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA G S ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781005
- 2. Page No.# 2/4 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF JORHAT DIST- JORHAT P.O P.S AND DIST JORHAT ASSAM 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) JORHAT P.O P.S AND DIST- JORHAT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A T SARKAR Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUDHANSHU DHULIA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 10-05-2021 (Sudhanshu Dhulia, CJ) The matter is taken up through video conferencing. None appears for the petitioner. Mr. J. Payeng, learned standing counsel, Foreigners Tribunal, Mr. A. Bhuyan, learned standing counsel, Election Commission of India and Ms. L. Devi, learned standing counsel, NRC, are present. This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the judgment & order dated 13.05.2019 passed by the Foreigners’ Tribunal, Jorhat in F.T. Case No.JFT/567/2006, wherein he had been declared as a foreigner. Without going into the merit of the case, the admitted position is that the
- 3. Page No.# 3/4 petitioner is in detention since 13.05.2019 and he will shortly be completing two years of his detention. In consideration of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 13.04.2020 in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No.1/2020 (In Re: Contagion of Covid 19 virus in prisons), which had been followed by a Division Bench of this Court later in WP(C) (Suo Moto) No.1/2020 (Gauhati High Court -Vs- Union of India & Ors.) dated 15.04.2020, a detenue is liable to be released after completing two years in detention or his furnishing personal bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) and like amount of two sureties. We, therefore, direct that the petitioner be released. However, under these strange and difficult circumstances, we would direct that the petitioner be released on a personal bond and one surety of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) instead of two sureties. In fact, we must reiterate that in view of the order of the Division Bench of this Court dated 15.04.2020 passed in WP(C) (Suo Moto) No.1/2020, no separate order needs to be passed in each case and the concerned authority are hereby directed, wherever such detenues are detained, to release them forthwith as and when they complete their two years of detention with the following modification that under these exceptional circumstances of the second wave of Covid-19 pandemic, they may be released on their personal bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) and one surety instead of two sureties. Let copies of this order be communicated to all the Superintendent of Police (Border) of all the districts, including the Superintendent and authorities of all the Jails and such detentions where foreigners are being detained. Let this be done within forty-eight hours from today. We also make it very clear that in the order dated 15.04.2020 passed by
- 4. Page No.# 4/4 the Division Bench of this Court in WP(C) (Suo Moto) No.1/2020, there are certain directions. Those directions shall be complied with at the time of release of a detenue. List after four weeks. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant