Ontology Diagrams for Successful Knowledge Capture & Transfer
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•458 views
Presentation at the 2013 Taxonomy Boot Camp in Washington D.C..
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Ontology Diagrams for Successful Knowledge Capture & Transfer
Similar to Ontology Diagrams for Successful Knowledge Capture & Transfer (20)
More from Brandon Olson
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Ontology Diagrams for Successful Knowledge Capture & Transfer
- 1. Ontology Diagrams for Successful Knowledge Capture & Transfer Brandon Olson, PhD Associate Professor School of Business and Technology The College of St. Scholastica bolson1@css.edu
- 4. Business Case Regional Accreditation Professional Accreditation Curricular Assessment Embedded Documents NELS – Field Experiences Complete Assessment System Need: Understand department’s curricular assessment domain to identify data and process requirements
- 6. Ontology Layer Topic Network Mitri’s Assessment System Model Skill Network Assessment Layer Judgements Agent Layer Evaluators Students Mitri, M. (2003). A knowledge management framework for curricular assessment. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(4), 15.
- 7. Level 1 Hill’s Forms of Assessment Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 • Satisfaction • Knowledge & Skill Changes • Performance Behavior Changes • Applied Performance Hill, A. (2007). Continuous curriculum assessment and improvement: A case study. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (112), 33-45.
- 8. Purpose Systematic method to understand and classify a domain area Used to explore new domain areas Ontology Engineering Types Inspiration Induction Deduction Synthesis Collaboration Holsapple, C.W., & Joshi. (2002). A collaborative approach to ontology design. Communications of the ACM, 45(2), 42-47.
- 10. Gain Access Inventory Artifacts Collaborative Ontology Engineering Process Review Artifacts Develop Specifications Diagram Anchor Ontology Models Collaborative Review Revise
- 11. Artifact Type Quantity Course Syllabus Survey Template 7 Evaluation Template 1 Report Artifact Inventory 46 3 Department Policy 1 Web Page 3 External Policy 4 Information System 3 Total: 68
- 13. ID 1.00 Description 1.01 1.00 Faculty Faculty are members of the academic department who perform evaluations as part of the curricular review of individual courses and student performance on classroom and clinical activities. References: 1.49, 1.08, 1.21 1.02 Ontology Specifications Parent ID Topic Evaluators 1.00 Preceptors The preceptor is an experienced practitioner responsible for guiding and facilitating the student learning experiences in the clinical setting of the preceptor’s area of expertise. The preceptor evaluates the student’s knowledge and skills demonstrated as part of the clinical learning experience. References: 2.04.20, 3.03.09 1.03 1.00 Employers Employers of graduates from the program evaluate the alumni’s demonstrated effectiveness and skills relative achieving the program outcomes. References: 1.51, 1.57 1.04 1.00 Students Students evaluate course and seminar experiences as well as impressions of the overall program. These evaluations take place as part of seminar exit surveys, CoursEval satisfaction surveys, and program surveys. References: 1.47, 1.48, 1.50, 1.52 Evaluees Evaluees are the individuals or entities whose program curricular performance is assessed by the evaluator. 2.00 Evaluators are the individuals performing a critical assessment of the evaluee within the scope of assessing the program’s curricular performance.
- 21. Researcher Satisfaction Quick understanding of complex domain Unified understanding Multiple levels of review and communication Results High stakeholder satisfaction Visibility of hidden attributes Visibility of hidden relationships Improved macro understanding Improved communication
- 22. Discussion?