Urban renewal in France by Clemence PINEL
volunteer at Merhav - the Movement for Israeli Urbanism (www.miu.org.il)
Presented as part of the Urban Empowerment Lab that seeks to develop tools for the transformation of aging and decaying Israeli public housing complexes - built in the 1950s-1970s - into places with a high quality of life.
3. On a national level, what guidelines?
Grenelle de
l’Environnement, a Round
Table, 2007.
Objective: key points of
government policy on
ecological and sustainable
development issues.
Method: bring civilians and
public service
representatives together.
4. Concrete ideas on urbanism
“Ecocités”: thinking inside
Development of Plan a city, harmonization of
Ville Durable: neighborhoods.
Holistic approach.
“Ecoquartiers”: in a
neighborhood.
Green transportation,
densities, social mix
and mix uses, urban “Nature en ville”: thinking
forms. green spaces in
neighborhoods.
5. Identification of neighborhoods, ZUS
Since 1996, identifications of neighborhoods
considered sensitive.
In 2000, 751 ZUS.
Criteria: unemployment, economic
development, access to health system,
security, school results…
ONZUS evaluates those neighborhoods.
6. Statistics
Unemployment
ONZUS
highlights
main
inequalities
between ZUS
and France.
Compared unemployment between ZUS and France
7. ANRU, the National Agency for Urban
Renewal
Since 2003, in charge of the programs of
urban renovation in ZUS.
530 neighborhoods, 4 millions inhabitants
Objectives:
Develop public buildings,
Improve urban spaces,
Rehabilitate / demolish / reorganize social
housing.
12. What neighborhood?
Built from 1958 to 1962
1595 housing units,
mainly social housing
What kind of buildings?
• 6 towers of 9 to 11 floors
• 2/3 of buildings are slobs
of 4 floors
13. Statistics
Les Carreaux Villiers-le-Bel Paris Region France
Unemployed 19.7% 19.2% 6.8% 7.8%
(2008)
Not graduated 31.4% 28.9% 18% Not given
(1999)
Under 25 Y 44% 40.8% 31.3% 31.2%
(1999)
Foreigners 25% 20.8% 15.4% 5.8%
(1999)
Social housing 97.5% 45% 27.4% Not given
Families not 52.1% 45.4% 35.5% 47.7%
taxed on the
income (2004)
Median Income 9337 11198 18812 18129
per year, Euros
Social security 17% 14.4% 6.3% 6.1%
CMU (2006)
Numbers of high 0.04 0.19 1.24 0.69
rank workers per
worker
14. What current situation ?
Even though disadvantages in the neighborhood:
Housing of small sizes
And their relative obsolescence
Urban issues: no mix uses, homogeneous population
Attractiveness due to several advantages:
Low rents
The proximity to the train station
The urban environment: a dynamic social life
15. Challenge
Develop the attractiveness
of the neighborhood by :
Connecting it to the rest
of the city
Preventing the
degradation of buildings
Diversifying the housing
offer
Improve mix uses
Reorganize public
spaces
16. For a more readable public
space
Reorganizing the streets system
17. A public space more readable
A main structure
New local streets
Pedestrian ways
Actual state Projected state
18. A new streets system
A main structure
New local streets
Pedestrian ways
Challenge:
aerate the space too
dense,
easier movements,
open the neighborhood
to the outside
19. Public spaces
Management of an alley
Development of
green spaces Green space before renovation
26. First constructions of housing
Demolitions
Breaking a building
in 2 to draw a street in
its middle.
27. Housing offer
modified,
reconstructions
Reconstructions, for a
diversified housing offer
In the rebuilt housing:
370 correspond to social
housing,
70 obey to free rental
conditions,
70 are accessible to
property
28. Rehabilitations
Rehabilitations in
the existing housing
1202 units
29. Housing offer modified, rehabilitations
Before and after renovations of the facades
Objectives:
harmonize ancient
buildings with new ones,
modernizes the image of
the neighborhood
In accommodations: increase
the level of comfort,
according to norms
In common spaces of
buildings, security modernity
Works on the facades
A building’s façade before rehabilitation
30. Organization of the space: between public
and private
For a clear demarcation
between private and public
spaces
Fences, hurdles
surrounding buildings
Inside private spaces,
instauration of private
parking places, green
spaces, playgrounds
31. Urban management
A new city from its conception to its
acceptance
32. Urban management
Instate a proximity.
Insist on Communication
A news paper on urban
renewal
A building dedicated to
communication to
inhabitants
Consultation of the
inhabitants
34. Who is financing?
ANRU, part of the national plan for renovation
OSICA, company for social housing
Département of Val d’Oise
Region of Ile de France
City of Villiers-le-Bel
35. Trélazé
An urban renewal project in the
neighborhood of Les Plaines
38. What kind of neighborhood?
An industrial city
Built in the 50’s-60’s,
Until 1966, 685 units are built
Mainly high rise housings estates
Composed of social housings at 72%
40. What current situation?
This ancient industrial city suffered from the
desegregation of its industry
Strong unemployment
No mix uses and homogeneous population
Vacancy in the housing
No longer attractive, suffering from its bad image
41. STATISTICS
Les Plaines Trélazé Angers France
Unemployed 25.3 % 15.9 % 15.7% 7.8%
(1999)
Less than 25 Y 39.7 % 35.1 % 37.8% 31.2%
(1999)
Foreigners (1999) 11.0 % 4.9 % 3.2% 5.8%
Social housing 72 % 38.8 % 32.3% Not given
(1999)
Families not 63.1 % 45.6 % 44.6% 47.7%
imposed on the
income (1999)
Not graduates 36.3 % 29 % 17.9% Not given
(1999)
CMU(2006) 17.7 % 9.3 % Not given 6.1%
Median income 10150 14072 15790 18129
in Euros (2004)
42.
43. Principles of the
project
Open up the
neighborhood by a
new central way
New public buildings
Work on the
housing: demolitions
– reconstructions -
renovations
48. Public spaces
Avenue Mendès France, a new axis
A North-South axis allowing
a fusion between the
neighborhoods of Trélazé
Green spaces developed
La Coulée Verte, a green line in the neighborhood
50. New public buildings
A new commercial center
Schools and leisure center
Social center welcoming
foreigners.
New school
51. The housing
A diversified and modernized offer
52. Housing
137 housing units
demolished
606 units rehabilitated,
among them, 339 units
transformed to be under
free rental conditions
109 units rebuilt (all
accessible to property)
53. Housing offer Demolition-reconstruction
process
New types of housing
established
Building X (17 units)
Buildings I and J (6 houses)
54. Buildings A and B (20 houses)
Allow a social mix by a
diversified housing offer
Renovated housings
Building Y (11 units)