Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Pre
A P
A Com
Asses
Urba
epared on Beh
Planning & Zoning/
D
P
S
mprehen
ssment a
n Redeve
half of Hapev
/Economic Develo
D...
City of Hapeville, Georgia
Strategic Development Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Urban Redevelopment Plan
Prologue 2
Introduction 3...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 2 |
PROLOGUE
On January 8, 1821, the Creek Nation Indians cede...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 3 |
INTRODUCTION
Over the past ten years, Hapeville has pursue...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 4 |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As the introduction notes, a number of h...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 5 |
BASIS ON FINDING THAT THE PLAN AREA QUALIFIES AS A REDEVEL...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 6 |
The predominance of defective or inadequate street layout
...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 7 |
CITY OF HAPEVILLE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP) – URBAN...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 8 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – URBAN REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREA BOUNDARIES
Hap...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 9 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – SYLVAN SPRINGDALE
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 10 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – SYLVAN SPRINGDAL...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 11 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – NORTH DOGWOOD
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 12 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – NORTH DOGWOOD– E...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 13 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL WEST
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 14 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL WEST – E...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 15 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – VIRGINIA INTERNA...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 16 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – VIRGINIA INTERNA...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 17 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – DOWNTOWN
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 18 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – DOWNTOWN – EXIST...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 19 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL EAST
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 20 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL EAST – E...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 21 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – ASBURY AEROTROPO...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 22 |
HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – ASBURY AEROTROPO...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 23 |
Existing Land Use in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapevil...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 24 |
Vacant Buildings in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapevill...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 25 |
Property Conditions in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapev...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 26 |
Areas of 15% Poverty in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 27 |
Areas Adjacent to 15% Poverty in the Urban Redevelopment ...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 28 |
Areas of 20% Poverty in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 29 |
Publically Owned Property in the Urban Redevelopment Area...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 30 |
Historic Resources in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapevi...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 31 |
Parcel Analysis in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapeville...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 32 |
Ownership Patterns in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapevi...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 33 |
Home Occupancy Patterns in the Urban Redevelopment Area
H...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 34 |
HAPEVILLE CRIME STATISTICS 2008-2010
2008 Offenses Report...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 35 |
2010 Offenses Reported by Month
Classification of Offense...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 36 |
CONFORMITY TO HAPEVILLE’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Hapevill...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 37 |
• Use public investment to leverage private investment
• ...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 38 |
PLANNING GOALS
The purpose of the Livable Centers Initiat...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 39 |
WORKABLE ACTION PLAN
The Hapeville Comprehensive Plan and...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 40 |
PROPOSED LAND USES AFTER REDEVELOPMENT
The Redevelopment ...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 41 |
Support new mixed-use developments with residential over ...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 42 |
Future Land Use in the Urban Redevelopment Area
Hapeville...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 43 |
CHANGES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN
Thi...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 44 |
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Sylvan-Springdale
The Syl...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 45 |
Downtown
Downtown Hapeville has a unique small-town charm...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 46 |
future of these two subareas will be a transition of dens...
Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010
Page 47 |
Aerotropolis Atlanta
The closing of the Ford Motors Assem...
ADDENDUM
Hapeville Strategic Development Plan – Pervasive Poverty, Underdevelopment, General Distress, and Blight Statisti...
Citywide Monthly Crime Statistics – Three Year Report
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 --- 52 52 ...
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD OF BLIGHTED PROPERTIES – BY SUBAREA
SYLVAN SPRINGDALE
01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10
11
SYLVAN SPRINGDALE
01
02 03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
NORTH DOGWOOD
01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08
NORTH DOGWOOD
01
0203
04
05
06 07
08
CENTRAL WEST
01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10
11
CENTRAL WEST
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
11
10
VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL
01 02 03 04 05
0706 08 09 10
VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL
01
02 03
04 05 07
06
08
09
10
DOWNTOWN
01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10
11 12
DOWNTOWN
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
CENTRAL EAST
01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10
CENTRAL EAST
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
ASBURY AEROTROPOLIS
01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10
11 12
ASBURY AEROTROPOLIS
01
02
03
04 05 06
0708
09
10
11
12
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Blight Statistics in the LRA
Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres
Land
Use
Occupancy
Status
Building
Condition
Pervasive
Pover...
Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan - Final Draft
Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan - Final Draft
Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan - Final Draft
Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan - Final Draft
Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan - Final Draft
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan - Final Draft

729 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan - Final Draft

  1. 1. Pre A P A Com Asses Urba epared on Beh Planning & Zoning/ D P S mprehen ssment a n Redeve half of Hapev /Economic Develo Develo Plan Strateg nsive Com and elopmen ville’s Mayor a opment Collaborat opmen gic mmunity nt Plan and City Coun ive – December 20 t y cil 010
  2. 2. City of Hapeville, Georgia Strategic Development Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Urban Redevelopment Plan Prologue 2 Introduction 3 Executive Summary 4 Definition and Qualification as Redevelopment Area 5 Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Map 7 Urban Redevelopment Subareas Sylvan Springdale Subarea 9 North Dogwood Subarea 11 Central West Subarea 13 Virginia International Subarea 15 Downtown Subarea 17 Central East Subarea 19 Asbury Aerotropolis Subarea 21 Redevelopment Area Maps Existing Land Use 23 Vacant Buildings 24 Property Conditions 25 Areas of 15-20% Poverty 26 Publicly Owned Property 29 Historic Resources 30 Parcel Analysis 31 Ownership Patterns 32 Occupancy Patterns 33 Other Plan Elements Crime Statistics 2008-2010 34 Conformity to Hapeville’s Comprehensive Plan 36 Planning Goals 38 Workable Action Plan 39 Proposed Land Uses After Development 40 Regulatory Changes to Implement the Plan 43 Maximum Densities after Redevelopment 43 Provisions for Relocation of Affected Residents 43 Proposed Redevelopment Projects 44 Planning & Zoning Department 3468 North Fulton Avenue Hapeville, GA 30354 Alan Hallman Mayor Ann Ray Alderman – At Large Richard Murray Councilman – At Large Jimmy Lovern Councilman – Ward I H. Lew Valero Councilman – Ward II Bill Werner City Manager
  3. 3. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 2 | PROLOGUE On January 8, 1821, the Creek Nation Indians ceded a large tract of land that included the present Hapeville area. In 1853 that land was incorporated into Fulton County. Hapeville grew out of individual farm settlements owned by the Thrailkill, Cash, Mangum, Sims and Hape families. In 1871, Dr. Samuel Hape and other investors purchased 500 acres of wooded land on the Macon and Western Central Georgia Railroad, eight miles south of Atlanta. The Village of Hapeville was chartered on September 16, 1891 by Dr. Samuel Hape, Hapeville’s first Mayor. Dr. Hape was a native of Middlebury, Maryland who came to Atlanta prior to the Civil War. The most significant impact on Hapeville’s future occurred when Asa G. Candler, Jr. allowed the center of his oval race track to be used as a landing field for aircraft. The City of Atlanta purchased this area in 1929 and founded its municipal airport, which eventually became the world’s busiest known as Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Hapeville is also home to Delta Air Lines, Inc. Corporate Headquarters. The December 1947 opening of the Ford Assembly Plant marked another major impact on Hapeville’s economy as did the 1960 opening of the Airport Hilton, linking Hapeville to the international chain of hotels. Hapeville is centrally located south of downtown Atlanta between I-75 and I-85 immediately adjacent to Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport. Hapeville is home to the original Dwarf House Chick-fil-A and Wells Fargo's Processing Center. Quality residential development in Hapeville’s various neighborhoods range from craftsman style bungalows and Chicago style traditional town homes to loft condos. Hapeville is also a designated Main Street City with a historic downtown featuring a Historic Depot Museum, recently renovated storefront facades, a lively downtown park, and a unique butterfly public art program. With the City government focused on planning for the future, Hapeville has experienced significant revitalization. Notably, the former Ford Motors Assembly Plant site is currently being redeveloped by Jacoby Development, Inc., world-class developers of Atlantic Station in Midtown Atlanta.
  4. 4. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 3 | INTRODUCTION Over the past ten years, Hapeville has pursued a series of innovative planning initiatives in an effort to retain and build upon the community’s rich historic urban fabric and proactively responded to growth in the community. This process started with the adoption of the Virginia Park Livable Centers Initiative (LCI) study in 2001, and followed by the Hapeville Town Center LCI in 2005, which provided a vision and implementation strategy to address the City’s transportation, land use, and community development goals. Implementation of the City’s two LCI studies has resulted in adoption of architectural and urban design regulations, including the creation of four mixed-use zoning districts with graduated-densities. The City of Hapeville now seeks to prepare an Urban Redevelopment Plan pursuant to Title 36, Chapter 61 of the Georgia Code to expand its set of implementation tools, qualify for a range of state and federal financing programs and create additional financial incentives for redevelopment. This Hapeville Strategic Development Plan (SDP) conforms to the requirements of the Urban Redevelopment Act, Title 36, Chapter 61 of the Georgia Code. It includes supporting documentation that will facilitate its implementation, such as maps and graphic illustrations, in order to guide the pattern of redevelopment in a fashion compatible with the community’s vision for the city’s core area. This vision has been set out in several recent public documents, including the 2001 Virginia Park LCI study, the 2005 Hapeville Towne Center LCI study (and 5-Year Implementation Plan Update, adopted in August 2010), the City’s Comprehensive Plan, also updated in 2005, Hapeville Architectural Design Standards (2006), Aerotropolis Atlanta and Asbury Park Development of Regional Impact (DRI) studies (2007), and the 2009 Hapeville Tax Allocation District. This Strategic Development Plan distills the goals and recommendations of these plans into a brief and direct summary plan which meets the requirements of the Georgia Urban Redevelopment Act and provides the implementation tools necessary to accomplish the goals in those plans which remain valid.
  5. 5. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 4 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As the introduction notes, a number of higher-level master plans have been developed by the City of Hapeville. This plan is not another high-level master plan; it is a plan for implementing the goals and projects of those plans which have already been done and are in place. Those plans express many goals and list many projects. This plan seeks to identify the themes in those goals which address pervasive community needs and desires. The plan prioritizes the projects which respond broadly to those needs and desires and puts into place a mechanism that can fund, manage and build those projects. To accomplish this program the City of Hapeville has chosen the Urban Redevelopment Plan format, an extremely flexible tool that the General Assembly of Georgia has created for local governments’ use in combating, mitigating and correcting conditions of blight, decline and disinvestment. A later section of this plan recapitulates the goals expressed in all these plans. The broad themes that come out of them are: The need to rehabilitate and replace substandard housing with safe, clean, comfortable, attractive and affordable housing The need to improve, extend and enhance the City’s circulation system, especially its pedestrian elements The need to improve, expand and enhance public open space of all sorts The City Council is implementing a program to accomplish these expressed goals by authorizing the Hapeville Redevelopment Authority, which has the powers granted by the state’s Urban Redevelopment Law, to pursue a wide variety of activities which can fund and develop the public projects and which can encourage new private investment. This authority is charged with developing specific, implementation-oriented work plans to carry out those purposes by opening new funding sources and partnership opportunities to the City. The Hapeville Redevelopment Authority consists of the Mayor and City Council in order to maintain continuity and ensure goals are carried out as originally intended.
  6. 6. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 5 | BASIS ON FINDING THAT THE PLAN AREA QUALIFIES AS A REDEVELOPMENT AREA [O.C.G.A 36-61-2(18)] Under the Urban Redevelopment Law (Georgia Code Title 36, Chapter 61), the City of Hapeville is authorized to create a Redevelopment Area. Pursuant to that power, the City Council adopted a resolution finding that the Redevelopment Area defined herein meets the definition of a slum area in accordance with OCGA 36-61-2(18). Herein the Council authorizes the Hapeville Redevelopment Authority, acting with the support of appropriate City departments, as Redevelopment Agent. According to the Urban Redevelopment Law (O.C.G.A. 36-61-2(18)), by demonstrating one or any combination of the following characteristics, a designated area is defined as a slum and eligible to be designated Redevelopment Area under the law. An area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence, existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes; These characteristics have been demonstrated in several of the existing plans, including the City of Hapeville Comprehensive Plan and the Town Center LCI Plan. They are also shown on several of the following maps, which illustrate extent of poverty conditions, vacant and deteriorating properties and crime statistics. Any combination of … factors … conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, or crime and is detrimental to public health, safety, morals or welfare. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or usefulness The following Parcel Analysis and Ownership maps demonstrate both the fragmentation of ownership and the predominance of smaller parcels which make private redevelopment prohibitively complicated and costly. While this situation is not necessarily an issue in neighborhoods, it makes assembly and redevelopment in commercial and transitional residential areas very difficult for private sector developers. That we see a disproportionate absence of homestead exemption filings in several residential areas suggests that those areas have a lower owner-occupancy levels and higher levels of investor and absentee ownership.
  7. 7. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 6 | The predominance of defective or inadequate street layout The Comprehensive Plan, Town Center LCI study, Hapeville TAD, and others identify the lack of an interconnected, safe and comfortable pedestrian system. They also document hazardous vehicular situations and vehicular-pedestrian conflicts that result from the street layout’s inadequacies. CONCLUSION The area defined as the “Redevelopment Area” on the following map demonstrates a variety of conditions which meet the definition of a “Slum Area” in O.C.G.A. 36-61-2(18).
  8. 8. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 7 | CITY OF HAPEVILLE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SDP) – URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AREA DISTRICT BOUNDARY Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville’s Urban Redevelopment Area (URA) encompasses the majority of the City’s commercially zoned properties located adjacent to Census block groups with poverty rates in excess of 15 and 20%. The URA is comprised of 555 individual parcels totaling 377.2 combined acres with an average lot size 0.67 acres – the largest single parcel being roughly 91 acres (part of the old Ford Motors Assembly Plant property). Significant portions of the URA are located in close proximity to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport – the busiest in the world – which makes the area a prime opportunity for targeted redevelopment.
  9. 9. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 8 | HAPEVILLE SDP – URBAN REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREA BOUNDARIES Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville’s Urban Redevelopment Area (URA) is further broken down by Subareas as defined by their historic development characteristics and/or particular challenges affecting future redevelopment opportunities – i.e. zoning, location, etc. Breaking the analysis into subareas allows us to address the specific needs of each area independently in an effort to maximize the potential effectiveness of the Urban Redevelopment Plan. Subarea – # Parcels/Acreage (Abbreviated) SS – 48 parcels/44.1 acres ND – 78 parcels/20.5 acres CW – 55 parcels/26.7 acres DT – 77 parcels/20.1 acres CE – 41 parcels/25.2 acres VI – 74 parcels/47.6 acres AA – 74 parcels/192.9 acres
  10. 10. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 9 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – SYLVAN SPRINGDALE
  11. 11. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 10 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – SYLVAN SPRINGDALE – EXISTING CONDITIONS The Sylvan Springdale subarea is located north and west of Interstate 85, south of the City of Atlanta, and east of the City of East Point. The area once flourished with commercial uses allied with nearby Hartsfield- Jackson Atlanta International Airport, including off- airport rental car facilities for Hertz and Enterprise. With the completion of the Consolidated Rental Car facility (CONRAC) west of the airport in 2009, the operations off Sylvan Road were abandoned, leaving expansive parking lots devoid of any commercial activity. The area is further depressed by a sizeable vacant hotel, boarded up garage, and proximity to the Owens Illinois glass recycling plant in the neighboring jurisdiction of East Point. Areas on the northern side of the subarea are primarily residential in use, and include rental homes, a cluster of duplexes, and several vacant lots. Although the City has recently repaved the corridor, and planted attractive landscaping, the Sylvan Springdale subarea remains largely blighted and underdeveloped. The City has identified the area as an economic development priority and has planned for a redevelopment feasibility study of the area in the City’s 5-Year Implementation Plan Update for the Town Center Livable Centers Initiative Study.
  12. 12. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 11 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – NORTH DOGWOOD
  13. 13. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 12 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – NORTH DOGWOOD– EXISTING CONDITIONS Once the primary commercial corridor into Hapeville’s central business district, the North Dogwood subarea is a mix of single-family homes and low-density commercial and retail uses. Structures along this corridor range from the early 20th to the early 21st Century, and are in various states of operation, use, and condition. The Dogwood Drive corridor, also known as state route 19/41, experienced decline with the development of the interstate system, and now serves primarily as a sparsely trafficked arterial road with small neighborhood businesses catering to local residents. Central to the commercial activities along this corridor is a Family Dollar general merchandise retail store. The subarea is also home to several boarded up homes, vacant used car lots, and a vacant neighborhood grocery store. Although the roadway was resurfaced in 2010, the overall corridor shows signs of neglect and disinvestment. The redevelopment of this area is a priority for the City, and is currently in the Scoping Phase for a pedestrian streetscape project, which is expected to start (Phase 1) construction by 2012. Phase 2 of the project is currently prequalified by the Atlanta Regional Commission’s LCI program, but remains unfunded as of 2010.
  14. 14. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 13 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL WEST
  15. 15. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 14 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL WEST – EXISTING CONDITIONS The Central West subarea is comprised of the city’s commercial properties along North and South Central Avenues and Willingham Drive. The subarea is south of the Sylvan Springdale subarea, north of the Virginia International subarea, west of downtown Hapeville, and east of the East Point city limits. The area is typified by low density commercial and retail uses, a converted extended stay/weekly rental hotel, some light industrial properties, a vacant gas station, and a significant number of vacant lots. The southern edge of the subarea borders a large vacant property owned by Delta Airlines, while the rest of the area is dominated by an extended stay hotel and an unoccupied newly built townhouse development to the east. The area is considered a priority for redevelopment by the City, and a streetscape project has been planned for the entire corridor, although only part of the first project phase extends into this subarea (North Central Avenue Streetscape Project). The City has invested a significant amount of time and money trying to improve the aesthetics of the area including gateway signage and landscape enhancements along the Norfolk Southern and GDOT right-of-ways.
  16. 16. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 15 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL
  17. 17. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 16 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL – EXISTING CONDITIONS The Virginia International Subarea is located in one of the most built out areas of the city. It is adjacent to the corporate campus of Delta Airlines and has a number of national chain hotels on its borders, including Marriott’s Courtyard and Residence Inn and the towering Airport Hilton Hotel. Despite the adjoining corporate presence, the area is still marred by a number of vacant commercial and retail buildings, including a large multi-story office building formerly occupied by Delta Airlines Technology Center. The area is typified by a collection of incompatible uses, including residential across the street from auto repair, and the area has a number of vacant lots and expansive surface parking lots. The City has identified this area as an economic development priority, and is expected to start construction on a $2.1 million streetscape improvement project along Virginia Avenue/Doug Davis Drive in 2010. Future improvements are planned for International Boulevard, but are thus far unfunded.
  18. 18. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 17 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – DOWNTOWN
  19. 19. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 18 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – DOWNTOWN – EXISTING CONDITIONS Downtown Hapeville is the heart and soul of the community – home to the central business district, post office, schools, civic and government facilities. It is the historical city center and includes 20th Century commercial buildings and the historic Hapeville train depot. Although restaurants and personal service businesses thrive in this walkable environment, the retail sector has failed to flourish because of the transient nature of the economic environment. Specifically, Hapeville teams with life during the day with a population of around 56,000 people – but shrinks to an almost desolate population of 6,700 at night and on weekends. Central to downtown’s woes is a lack of housing density in the surrounding area, which would provide a market base with household incomes capable of sustaining a vibrant downtown economy. Compounding troubles in the city’s central business district are a number of highly visible vacant storefronts, vacant lots, and a host of incompatible land uses that would otherwise foster a healthy walkable community. Fortunately, Hapeville is a certified Main Street City with an active board dedicated to downtown revitalization. Further, the eventual buildout of Asbury Park, only blocks to the south, could provide 2,100 new housing units, adding roughly 5,600 people to establish a downtown neighborhood – sufficient to support retail and attract a quality neighborhood grocery store.
  20. 20. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 19 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL EAST
  21. 21. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 20 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – CENTRAL EAST – EXISTING CONDITIONS The Central East Subarea consists of commercial and residential properties bound by North Central Avenue – east of Dearborn Plaza – King Arnold Street to the north, and Sunset Drive to the east. The subarea is predominantly commercial typified by low density retail strip centers, auto services, commercial offices and restaurants. The north side of the subarea is dominated by multifamily rental complexes dating back to the 1960s. The most famous business in the subarea is the original Chick-fil-A Dwarf House – home of the first Chick-fil-A restaurant. The eastern side of the subarea has a number of vacant buildings and large vacant parcels. Across the railroad tracks form the Central East subarea is the proposed location for Hapeville’s passenger rail station, as well as Jacoby Development’s Aerotropolis Atlanta. The City has embarked on a streetscape project that will eventually span the entire North Central corridor. However, it will be a number of years before the Central East portion of the project is funded for engineering and construction. The redevelopment of the Central East Subarea is a priority for the City as the redevelopment of the old Ford Assembly Plant site moves forward.
  22. 22. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 21 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – ASBURY AEROTROPOLIS
  23. 23. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 22 | HAPEVILLE SDP – REDEVELOPMENT SUBAREAS – ASBURY AEROTROPOLIS – EXISTING CONDITIONS Asbury Aerotropolis gets its name from the two master planned developments that have been underway in this subarea for years. Asbury Park, which evolved from a moderate density mixed-use project into a 2,100-unit housing development promising up to 75 units per acre with an additional 70,000 square feet of supportive neighborhood retail. Due east, Jacoby Development’s Aerotropolis Atlanta is a vision of a vibrant commercial development containing 6.5 Million square feet of hotel, convention, office, technology mart, and off-airport commercial parking. The City has millions of dollars invested in the success of both projects. However, the economic recession that started in 2008 brought both projects to a standstill. Phase 1 of the Asbury Park project was completed providing roughly 300 housing units – about 1,800 units shy of buildout. The demolition and remediation of the old Ford Factory property continued well through 2009, but the land has gone untouched for most of 2010. With so much riding on these two projects, it would be premature to consider either being in jeopardy. As of now, Aerotropolis Atlanta sits as a 140-acre dirt pad, while the Asbury Park area is riddled with deteriorated houses surrounded by vacant lots and the occasional rundown apartment complex. Although things are looking bleak, both developers have a lot of money, time, and effort invested in these projects not to resume, in some fashion or another, once the economy starts to rebound, credit markets thaw, and consumer confidence returns.
  24. 24. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 23 | Existing Land Use in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area This map shows existing land uses in the Redevelopment Subareas. Data shows significant vacant parcels and a disjointed historic development pattern with a mix of uses – not traditionally compatible. Land Use - Acreage Commercial 236 Parcels/5.2 Acres Industrial 23 Parcels/1.7 Acres Public/Institutional 29 Parcels/1.6 Acres Residential 124 Parcels/2.6 Acres Vacant 129 Parcels/90.9 Acres Transportation/Utilities 8 Parcels/2.2 Acres
  25. 25. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 24 | Vacant Buildings in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area This map shows vacant land or vacant buildings located within the Urban Redevelopment Area. For purposes of this study, vacant land includes undeveloped parcels and vacant lots, including parking lots, not otherwise accessory to an occupied or operating use. Vacant buildings are defined as being at least 90% vacant as a whole on the parcel, but excludes vacant commercial units in multitenant developments, as well as vacancies for multi-family rentals, and single-family homes for sale or rent. The map shows significant vacancies in the Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area. Out of 555 parcels, accounting for 377 acres, 213 parcels or 238 acres is currently vacant. This is a strong indication of the area’s blight.
  26. 26. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 25 | Property Conditions in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Buildings were evaluated based on appearance and neighborhood context without taking into account any interior renovations or unseen problems. The categories are as follows: Standard: Building in sound condition or requires only minor repairs such as painting and landscaping. Substandard: Building requires some level of general repair (i.e. renovation cost $5,000 - $15,000 for a single- family house) Deteriorated: Building requires major repairs such as a new roof, foundation, siding or windows (more than three identified problems; renovation cost $15,000-- $45,000) Dilapidated: Building needs extensive rehabilitation and may require demolition (renovation cost is greater than $45,000) Statistics: (# Parcels) Standard 223 Substandard 90 Deteriorated 50 Dilapidated 8 Vacant Lots 177
  27. 27. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 26 | Areas of 15% Poverty in the Urban Redevelopment Area
  28. 28. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 27 | Areas Adjacent to 15% Poverty in the Urban Redevelopment Area
  29. 29. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 28 | Areas of 20% Poverty in the Urban Redevelopment Area
  30. 30. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 29 | Publically Owned Property in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area This map shows properties, citywide, owned by a public or institutional intity within the Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area. This map indicates a significant amount of land that is exempt from local property taxes due to their status as a public or institutional use – the largest of those properties being owned by the City of Atlanta occupied by Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Public Use - Acreage Institutional Use – 12.3 acres City of Atlanta – 171.4 acres City of Hapeville – 33.6 acres Fulton County – 20.5 acres State of Georgia – 1.7 acres Federal Govt. – 0.5 acres
  31. 31. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 30 | Historic Resources in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville’s National Register District, including contributing and noncontributing structures. This map shows the historic designation of properties, citywide, located within Hapeville’s National Register District, as well as their relationship to the identified Urban Redevelopment Plan subareas. If any altering of historic properties is required and involves use of public funds by this redevelopment effort, such modifications will take place in accordance with relevant federal, state, and local guidelines and regulations. This plan incorporates the guarantee that projects considered for any form of public funding, including loan guarantees, sale-leaseback arrangements or others, have developed their plans using a proactive approach to rehabilitation and reuse of historic properties.
  32. 32. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 31 | Parcel Analysis in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Parcel Analysis This map illustrates the analysis of parcel size described in the Urban Redevelopment Plan. Data shows that with few exceptions, the vast majority of parcels located within the Redevelopment Area are smaller than one acre in size. While this situation is not necessarily an issue within surrounding residential neighborhoods, it makes assembly and redevelopment in commercial and transitional residential areas very difficult. Coupled with the nature of the district’s ownership patterns, it is reasonable to expect that the type and quality of redevelopment necessary to achieve the district’s planning goals will be extremely difficult to accomplish.
  33. 33. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 32 | Ownership Patterns in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Ownership Patterns This map analyzes the parcel ownership within the Redevelopment Area. The majority of parcels in the district are owned by entities outside of the city. In the city’s commercial areas, the fragmentation of ownership indicates that assembly and redevelopment in commercial and transitional residential areas would likely be very difficult. Coupled with the nature of the district’s parcel size patterns (reflected in the previous map), it is reasonable to expect that the type and quality of redevelopment necessary to accomplish the district’s planning goals will not happen if left to the private sector to assemble large enough tracts for many redevelopment projects.
  34. 34. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 33 | Home Occupancy Patterns in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Occupancy Patterns This map analyzes the occupancy patterns of the community as a whole. From this map, we get a sense of the fragmentation between owner-occupied properties and those owned by absentee property owners. Although commercial uses are not eligible to file for Homestead Exemptions, the map does reflect both a dynamic mix of rental versus owner occupied housing, as well as concentrations of investor-owned houses which may be contributing to excessive rental to owner- occupied ratios, potential deferred property maintenance, lower property values, and lower average household incomes.
  35. 35. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 34 | HAPEVILLE CRIME STATISTICS 2008-2010 2008 Offenses Reported by Month Classification of Offense Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Total Criminal Homicide - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Forcible Rape - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery - 5 5 5 1 1 0 1 3 8 6 4 39 Assault - 14 14 13 11 5 10 3 9 5 8 7 99 Burglary - 5 5 6 8 10 10 1 13 6 15 9 88 Larceny-Theft - 24 24 19 20 16 21 18 28 17 21 27 235 Motor Vehicle Theft - 4 4 6 3 3 7 4 7 4 12 3 57 Monthly Total - 52 52 49 43 35 48 27 61 40 62 50 519 2009 Offenses Reported by Month Classification of Offense Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Total Criminal Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Forcible Rape 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Robbery 4 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 5 4 4 1 24 Assault 13 4 5 5 8 7 9 0 0 2 2 0 55 Burglary 9 5 2 7 7 14 13 7 9 7 7 2 89 Larceny-Theft 16 25 11 16 19 24 23 12 17 21 9 15 208 Motor Vehicle Theft 7 10 2 6 5 5 4 12 7 8 12 6 84 Monthly Total 49 45 20 37 41 50 50 31 38 42 34 24 461
  36. 36. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 35 | 2010 Offenses Reported by Month Classification of Offense Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Total Criminal Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - - 1 Forcible Rape 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - 3 Robbery 1 1 0 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 - - 14 Assault 3 1 1 0 1 3 0 2 9 10 - - 30 Burglary 10 7 2 10 7 8 4 5 13 7 - - 73 Larceny-Theft 5 13 10 7 29 18 20 21 28 25 - - 176 Motor Vehicle Theft 5 7 2 8 8 5 4 11 7 4 - - 61 Monthly Total 25 29 17 26 48 36 29 40 61 47 - - 358 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Downtown Hapeville is traversed by the Norfolk Southern Railroad. Five of the seven subareas identified in the Hapeville Strategic Development Plan are adjacent to the railroad right-of-way. When Ford was producing vehicles, is was not uncommon to have at least half of the paved crossovers blocked by freight cars, which was detrimental to fostering a healthy economic base in downtown Hapeville. Since Ford is now closed, it is still common to see car carriers parked on the tracks, especially on the east side of town. These empty carriers contribute to the overall sense of blight in downtown and along the Central Avenue corridor. In the future, the rail could become an asset to the community – when and if the state passenger rail program is implemented. Hapeville has been identified as a stop on the Atlanta-Macon passenger rail line, which would likely be located adjacent to Jacoby’s Aerotropolis Atlanta project on the City’s southeast side. The future of the state’s passenger rail program remains an uncertainty, and therefore does not alleviate the adverse impact the rail line has on the town.
  37. 37. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 36 | CONFORMITY TO HAPEVILLE’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Plan includes several operational goals: • Expand the City’s implementation tools • Qualify Hapeville for a range of state and federal financing programs • Create additional financial incentives for private sector investment in redevelopment • Assure that adequate urban design tools are in place which result in new development that embodies the quality and character goals expressed in a series of earlier planning initiatives. The Hapeville Comprehensive Plan, last updated in 2005, is one of several planning initiatives that the City has completed over the past decade. These documents provide a consistent purpose and vision throughout that period: • The need to rehabilitate and replace substandard housing with safe, clean, comfortable, attractive and affordable housing. • The need to improve, extend and enhance the City’s circulation system, especially its pedestrian elements • The need to improve, expand and enhance public open space of all sorts. This plan’s purpose is to provide additional tools to implement the Hapeville Comprehensive Plan and other plans still functioning. It draws its purposes and projects from the Hapeville Comprehensive Plan and so is by definition in conformance with that plan. This section summarizes the community development goals expressed in the half dozen plans which have been completed for the City of Hapeville over the past decade. The intention of the Hapeville Strategic Development Plan is to: • Identify goals which are still valid • Build upon them so that the community can move to a more immediate level of implementing policies, programs and projects which advance these goals. All of the following are direct extracts from the planning documents, slightly edited in some instances for consistency of form. Several themes carry through these documents which will form the bases of the action items in this Urban Redevelopment Area Plan: • Build to sustain the community’s historic character and fabric • Model new development on the community’s human scale and walkability • Build compact, mixed-use districts and neighborhoods with high connectivity • Build public spaces • Preserve and integrate the community’s natural resources into its fabric • Build a range of housing options affordable to a wide spectrum of the citizenry
  38. 38. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 37 | • Use public investment to leverage private investment • Establish a level of quality for new development, redevelopment and rehabilitation through public investment and regulations.
  39. 39. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 38 | PLANNING GOALS The purpose of the Livable Centers Initiative (LCI) Study is to address specific development issues in those communities which may be prototypical for the Atlanta region in general. In concert with the establishment of Hapeville’s LCI program, the City hosted a number of public workshops to garner citizen input into the city’s future redevelopment goals. More specific goals for Hapeville may be drawn from a series of desirable outcomes for the community that the workshops identified: • Create regional strategies for transportation, land use and economic growth • Understand that sustainable community design is based on the effect of the built environment on the natural environment, aesthetics, scale, history and culture • Promote efficient use of existing infrastructure, energy, water and land • Incorporate compact integrated land uses which bring people closer to work, to school and shopping and safeguard undeveloped lands for urban agriculture, greenspace and recreation • Provide transportation options so that each member of the community has access to goods, services and recreation • Design transportation options to be safe, healthy, economically strong, environmentally sound and inclusive • Strengthen the downtown with higher density housing and new retail shops • Bring greater variety in shops, goods and services • Retain the workforce within the boundaries of Hapeville • Reduce the large number of short trips, which consumes large amounts of street capacity • Invest in lower-cost improvements in the area's streets and highways (improved traffic signs, access spacing) • Invest in travel alternatives (bike paths and walkways) • Establish more places for socializing and association (parks and trails, strengthening of the historic CBD) • Design developments with a mixture of ages, incomes and races • Bringing the community closer together physically (open space linkages, better movement connections) • Creating institutions and events which would draw people together, preferably in the central areas • Direct development into areas with existing physical and social infrastructure • Stabilize the historic central business district and place new development within walking distance or a short drive • Place more new development near the proposed passenger rail station reducing vehicle miles traveled and encouraging more rail use • Increase city tax base to fund and maintain a high quality of life • Provide more diverse residential neighborhoods which contribute to long term neighborhood and city sustainability
  40. 40. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 39 | WORKABLE ACTION PLAN The Hapeville Comprehensive Plan and related planning initiatives have laid out clear goals for the central core of Hapeville. The plans and studies also have identified many valuable projects aimed at implementing those goals. This plan takes the steps to organize those goals and projects into a Workable Plan to implement their primary objectives as elements of this Urban Redevelopment Plan. Upon adoption of this plan by the City Council: 1. The Hapeville Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is hereby created as provided in Title 36, Chapter 61 of the Georgia Code and is designated as the City of Hapeville’s Redevelopment Agent for implementation of this Plan. The HRA shall Have the powers granted to an Urban Redevelopment Agent under Title 36, Chapter 61 of the Georgia Code Be guided by a board of directors consisting of five members Establish a regular meeting schedule for the Agency Confirm Board membership and appoint a Chairman Establish an annual work plan with the primary focus of implementing this Plan First year work plan shall include identification of priority redevelopment areas, and establishing and marketing economic development incentives available through the Opportunity Zone Program. The HRA shall not have the power of eminent domain, which shall remain vested in the City Council. 2. A HRA Board is hereby convened. The HRA Board shall be composed of five members consisting of: The Mayor of Hapeville who shall act as chairman 1 appointment from each city council member – (4 total)
  41. 41. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 40 | PROPOSED LAND USES AFTER REDEVELOPMENT The Redevelopment Area is composed of seven subareas. Most of these subareas face a similar range of housing and community stabilization issues. These subareas will retain the primary land uses they currently have, although secondary uses such as recreational and neighborhood commercial may be introduced to these areas in order to strengthen them. The identified subareas draw the following abbreviated land use policies from the Hapeville Town Center LCI Plan for those districts: Land Use Policies Utilize a nodal framework for land use patterns radiating from the central business district. Centers proposed within the Redevelopment Area: Concentration of higher density commercial development south of South Central Avenue/Henry Ford Avenue and east of Atlanta Avenue. Encourage development along the Virginia Avenue corridor that is pedestrian-oriented and includes a mix of uses that support area office workers, hotel guests, and area residents, including retail, restaurant, and personal services. Encourage redevelopment of the Sylvan Road corridor for more transportation-oriented commercial/logistics businesses. Encourage less intense neighborhood retail and commercial uses along Dogwood Drive. Encourage transitional densities of commercial development along North Central Avenue both east and west of the central business district as a buffer against adjoining residential neighborhoods. Encourage historic preservation downtown and infill development in an appropriate pedestrian scale with a mix of housing and commercial/retail. Require all new development to be pedestrian-oriented. Preserve stable neighborhoods and protect them from commercial, multifamily and industrial encroachment. Gas stations are appropriate uses along the city’s commercial corridors in close proximity to the expressway, but their current form is not acceptable in recommended walkable centers. Preserve civic, industrial, religious, and most single-family residential land uses. Recognize that some auto-oriented uses are needed in areas in close proximity to the interstate, but that their scale and relationship to Downtown must be appropriate and their form pedestrian-oriented. Use the redevelopment of underutilized, auto-oriented land uses to create opportunities for new housing types and thus reduce pressure to increase density in the neighborhoods.
  42. 42. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 41 | Support new mixed-use developments with residential over retail, which could create a greater sense of “ownership” and revitalize the Central Business District. Promote quality, owner-occupied multifamily options, to increase the market appeal of Downtown and generate retail demand.
  43. 43. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 42 | Future Land Use in the Urban Redevelopment Area Hapeville Urban Redevelopment Area Future Land Use Analysis This map reflects the Future Land Use Map adopted by the City as the benchmark for the Urban Redevelopment Plan’s planning goals. The majority of future uses proposed include a pedestrian oriented mix of commercial, retail, and residential uses radiating from activity centers of varying scales and densities. The character of each subarea will appropriately transition into the scale of the surrounding community. Neighborhood scale commercial will be pursued along Dogwood Drive and North Central Avenue, while higher density commercial uses along Virginia and Sylvan Road will redevelop those subareas. Asbury Aerotropolis will develop into a regional activity center.
  44. 44. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 43 | CHANGES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN This plan does not anticipate the need to modify the zoning ordinance in order to implement its provisions. In 2006, the City of Hapeville initiated the Citywide Comprehensive Revitalization Program, which included higher density in most of the city’s residential areas, and rezoning for most commercial properties from general commercial to moderate density mixed use. At the same time, the City adopted minimum architectural and urban design standards. The zoning was again amended in 2009 to include a high-density mixed use zoning district that allows for up to 75 residential units per acre, and a zoning overlay allowing compact commercial densities. MAXIMUM DENSITIES IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AFTER REDEVELOPMENT Maximum densities based on land use standards are not anticipated to change. Actual population densities will in all likelihood increase since the plan addresses and seeks to alter two existing characteristics of the Redevelopment Area: abandonment of substandard dwellings and separation of land uses which excludes mixed use, and consequently residential use, in several areas of the Redevelopment Area. The City’s recently-adopted zoning ordinance already is addressing the latter. PROVISIONS FOR RELOCATION OF AFFECTED RESIDENTS This plan does not envision the need for relocation of residents. Remediation of housing deficiencies which are contributing to blight and slum conditions will target substandard, derelict and vacant properties. If, for any reason, the Hapeville Redevelopment Authority (HRA) shall determine it to be necessary to take some redevelopment action relating to occupied structures, it shall follow a “No Displacement” policy under which it may only take such action after it has made suitable provisions for and relocated the affected residents.
  45. 45. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 44 | PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Sylvan-Springdale The Sylvan-Springdale area is challenged by proximity to heavy industrial uses in neighboring East Point, as well as high crime and poverty in concentrated multi-family developments in Atlanta to the north. However, the subarea benefits from visibility and direct access to Interstate 85. Further, its proximity two exits north of the world’s busiest airport make it a likely candidate for future redevelopment. In addition, much of the assemblage has been done with the Hertz and Enterprise Car Rental facilities that once occupied much of the area. The City has long identified this area as a redevelopment priority, but has focused most of its efforts on the redevelopment of Hapeville’s south side over the past few years. The Sylvan-Springdale subarea would be a promising candidate for a transportation-related redevelopment effort, including, but not limited to, airfreight and logistics, minor warehousing and distribution, and potentially a business incubator for upstart businesses in need of smaller office space. Sylvan-Springdale would make a promising location for the Hapeville Trade Port. Virginia-International The Virginia-International subarea benefits by direct access to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport via the Airport Loop Road. Further, it is strengthened by large corporate entities, including Delta Airlines, Federal Express, and Wells Fargo in the immediate area. Conversely, the subarea is blighted by large vacant buildings, underdeveloped land, and a mix of land uses that do not establish a unified urban development pattern. The area longs to be a walkable and lively mix of restaurants, hotels, offices, and residential mixed-uses. The development of the Virginia International Center, incorporating the Delta Technologies building (vacant), and adjacent vacant parking lots, as well as properties fronting onto Virginia Avenue, promises to help the Virginia Avenue corridor accomplish its vision as a walkable work-live-play destination.
  46. 46. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 45 | Downtown Downtown Hapeville has a unique small-town charm with lines of historic storefronts, a classic train depot, parks, and an old post office – it exudes a sense of place – as the center of community activity. However, though downtown has established itself as a lunchtime destination, a place to get a haircut, and a great location for setting up a small office operation. Hapeville has not yet established the eclectic diversity of business types necessary to make the area succeed as a destination location for retail activities. This is in part due to the challenging demographics – 56,000 people in the city by day, but only 6,700 by night and on weekends. Downtown has also been mired with building vacancies and an existing mix of incompatible uses, including institutional uses and automotive repair businesses. The City has been aggressive over the past few years acquiring vacant buildings along North Central Avenue, the City’s main commercial street, and leasing them out to upstart businesses and community arts organizations. Much of downtown’s success is contingent on what happens in other subareas within the Urban Redevelopment Study Area, including North Dogwood (north), Central East (east), Central West (west), Asbury Park (south), and to some extent, Aerotropolis Atlanta (south). The City has actively supported the success of downtown though its commitment to the Main Street Program, façade grant program, placement of public art, landscaping, signage and other visual enhancements, as well as its commitment to fund extensive pedestrian improvement projects along North Central Avenue and Dogwood Drive. In addition, much of Hapeville is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, which offers economic incentives for the rehabilitation of downtown’s historic commercial buildings. Future development in Downtown Hapeville will focus on infill development that encourages pedestrian level activities and contributes to the historic scale and charm found within the subarea. Central West and Dogwood North The vision for these two subareas is somewhat similar. Located immediately adjacent to single-family neighborhoods, the desired development pattern for the future will focus on small scale commercial, retail, and residential uses. There are not large enough properties to accommodate larger redevelopment projects, and future development will focus on Urban Infill on existing lots. The
  47. 47. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 46 | future of these two subareas will be a transition of density and intensity of uses – increasing closer to the south and southeastern areas of Hapeville. Central East The Central East subarea is located in close proximity to I-75 with direct access to the freeway. In addition, it is across the railroad tracks from Jacoby’s Aerotropolis Atlanta project – the redevelopment of the old Ford Assembly Plant. The proximity to the railroad provides challenges and opportunities to the redevelopment of this subarea. Optimistically, there is some likelihood that the proposed Atlanta-Macon passenger rail station will be located adjacent to this subarea, which might provide an opportunity for a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) to be built on the eastern portion of the subarea. Additionally, as the area benefits from the redevelopment of Aerotropolis Atlanta, Central East is likely to feel the halo effect as developers seek to build onto Jacoby’s success. However, the area is currently somewhat isolated from downtown Hapeville, and lacks pedestrian connectivity to the redeveloping Ford property. These issues will be addressed as redevelopment in the area begins to progress in earnest. Asbury Park Asbury Park has been one of the most promising redevelopment efforts engaged in by the City over the past six years. However, like much of the country and Atlanta metropolitan region, the implementation of this ambitious mixed use project has been stalled in the current recession. The vision of Asbury Park includes a mix of 2,100 townhouse, condominium, apartment, and live-work units, with approximately 70,000sf of ground floor neighborhood retail. The City has been actively involved in the acquisition and assemblage of land, and has committed to several million dollars in infrastructure bond financing to aid in the completion of the project. In these economic times, the future of the Asbury Park project, as it was presented and approved by the City, the Atlanta Regional Commission, and the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority, remains an uncertainty. Currently much of the land has been assembled, and many of the once single-family neighborhood lots have been cleared and remain vacant. Asbury Park still promises to be a vibrant new urban mixed use community – though the timeline for completion and final configuration weighs heavily on the success of the adjacent Aerotropolis Atlanta project.
  48. 48. Hapeville Strategic Redevelopment Plan – November 2010 Page 47 | Aerotropolis Atlanta The closing of the Ford Motors Assembly Plant in 2006 marked the end of Hapeville’s industrial era, but provided an opportunity to redefine the city as a small but significant player in Atlanta’s development submarkets. The vision for Aerotropolis Atlanta incorporates 6.5 million square feet of commercial development, including hotels, conference center, office, retail, data/technology mart, and a 4,000space commercial parking facility covered by the largest collection of solar panels in the southeastern United States. Aerotropolis is the largest redevelopment effort in the city since the expansion of the Atlanta Airport, and is expected to help stabilize the local economic base once completed. The plant was demolished in 2009, but has lacked any noticeable activity on the site for almost a year. The future of Aerotropolis Atlanta is far from a done deal as economic pressures, tight credit markets, reticent corporate expansion plans, and an overall stagnant economy have delayed implementation of the project. The City of Hapeville continues to hope that the project will move forward at a more expedited pace, but is still cognizant of the challenges facing the local and national economies with respect the projected implementation timeline.
  49. 49. ADDENDUM Hapeville Strategic Development Plan – Pervasive Poverty, Underdevelopment, General Distress, and Blight Statistics Business License Data – Three Year Report* Year Business Licenses Issued 2008 276 2009 239 2010 243 *Business licenses exclude home occupation permits. All commercial properties located with Hapeville are within the boundaries of the LRA, and thus, there is no way to make a comparative analysis between licenses issued within the LRA as a percentage of licenses issued citywide. Permits Data within the LRA – Three Year Report Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 --- --- 2 15 16 12 9 9 11 12 6 5 2009 4 3 10 9 13 10 7 39* 9 7 5 2 2010 6 7 7 4 17 13 13 17 57* 5 48* 2 Permits Issued Citywide – Three Year Report Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 --- --- 13 40 29 28 16 21 19 27 20 14 2009 15 29 31 32 30 39 21 65* 36 19 18 22 2010 24 23 27 24 33 24 20 35 66* 13 60* 12 --- = No data available *Extremely high monthly volume of permits issued for the renovation of a Marriott Hotel on International Blvd.
  50. 50. Citywide Monthly Crime Statistics – Three Year Report Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 --- 52 52 49 43 35 48 27 61 40 62 50 2009 49 45 20 37 41 50 50 31 38 42 34 24 2010 25 29 17 26 48 36 29 40 61 47 --- --- * Statistics are provided citywide as we do not have the available resources to extrapolate only crimes occurring within the LRA. Provided that the City is only 2 square miles and 20% is occupied by the Atlanta Airport (which would not be included in local crime statistics), crimes reported are within or in very close proximity to LRA properties. A breakdown of crime statistics was in the original redevelopment plan adopted in December 2010 – ref. pp.34-35. --- Information not available at time of data collection.
  51. 51. PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD OF BLIGHTED PROPERTIES – BY SUBAREA SYLVAN SPRINGDALE 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
  52. 52. SYLVAN SPRINGDALE 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
  53. 53. NORTH DOGWOOD 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08
  54. 54. NORTH DOGWOOD 01 0203 04 05 06 07 08
  55. 55. CENTRAL WEST 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
  56. 56. CENTRAL WEST 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 11 10
  57. 57. VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL 01 02 03 04 05 0706 08 09 10
  58. 58. VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL 01 02 03 04 05 07 06 08 09 10
  59. 59. DOWNTOWN 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
  60. 60. DOWNTOWN 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
  61. 61. CENTRAL EAST 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
  62. 62. CENTRAL EAST 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
  63. 63. ASBURY AEROTROPOLIS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
  64. 64. ASBURY AEROTROPOLIS 01 02 03 04 05 06 0708 09 10 11 12
  65. 65. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00940001010 $61,800 0.077 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00940001011 $136,600 0.336 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00940001012 $57,800 0.161 COM 1 1 0 0 25% 14 00940001013 $92,500 0.137 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00940001014 $67,200 0.128 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00940001015 $70,800 0.126 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00940001016 $87,600 0.149 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00940001017 $90,700 0.147 RES VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00940001061 $90,500 0.492 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00940002053 $330,700 0.560 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00940002054 $39,100 0.270 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00940002055 $7,200 0.111 PI 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00940002062 $27,500 0.138 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00940002064 $114,400 0.141 PI 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00940002065 $31,300 0.141 PI 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00940002071 $56,900 0.089 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00940002072 $52,800 0.052 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00940002073 $22,000 0.137 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00940002076 $112,300 0.135 RES 1 0 1 1 75% 14 00940002087 $112,400 0.252 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00940002089 $5,000 0.134 RES VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950001001 $72,700 0.272 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950001003 $74,600 0.258 COM 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950001009 $196,500 0.492 IND VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950001011 $98,000 1.023 IND 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950001012 $105,300 0.435 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950001013 $80,400 0.233 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950001014 $97,900 0.295 RES VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00950001015 $93,300 0.265 RES VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950001018 $46,700 0.161 IND VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950001020 $152,400 0.315 PI VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00950001027 $80,400 0.243 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950001028 $159,300 0.350 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950001031 $107,500 0.621 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950001032 $158,100 0.204 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50%
  66. 66. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00950001033 $4,100 0.129 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950002003 $8,100 0.047 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950002005 $77,700 0.063 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950002006 $62,600 0.075 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950002007 $170,000 0.111 COM VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950002008 $117,500 0.073 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00950002011 $222,300 0.121 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950002012 $8,100 0.047 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950002013 $48,700 0.065 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950002014 $521,000 0.825 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003003 $985,000 1.754 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003008 $255,300 0.444 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003009 $26,900 0.337 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003012 $24,100 0.309 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950003013 $35,800 0.452 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950003014 $34,400 0.170 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003015 $331,500 0.172 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003016 $85,900 0.183 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003025 $151,400 0.429 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003026 $381,900 0.571 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003027 $570,300 0.846 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003029 $112,900 0.280 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950003030 $110,700 0.193 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950003032 $877,600 1.072 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003035 $1,015,400 1.229 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950003036 $170,700 0.331 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003039 $750,100 1.139 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003040 $256,700 0.656 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950003041 $110,600 0.332 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950003042 $412,200 0.851 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003043 $192,000 0.491 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950003XXX $800 0.042 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950004033 $82,400 0.507 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950004035 $12,400 0.107 PI 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950004036 $52,500 0.353 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100%
  67. 67. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00950005001 $24,700 0.281 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950005035 $118,100 0.372 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950006028 $30,000 0.263 COM VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950006033 $113,100 0.327 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950006034 $116,900 0.321 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00950006039 $166,400 0.634 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950006040 $534,700 0.671 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950006042 $80,000 0.717 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950006043 0.434 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950006049 $602,300 1.071 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00950015001 $55,300 0.224 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950015002 $12,800 0.077 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950015003 $8,400 0.040 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950015004 $8,400 0.041 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950015017 $31,700 0.046 COM 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950015021 $5,600 0.037 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950015038 $43,700 0.047 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950015045 $2,800 0.022 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950015046 $63,400 0.106 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950015047 $52,000 0.134 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00950015048 $19,400 0.129 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950015049 $61,900 0.140 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950015051 $127,100 0.166 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00950015053 $47,700 0.193 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950015054 $2,100 0.064 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00950015056 $298,700 0.608 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0096 LL050 $0 2.190 TU 1 0 1 1 75% 14 0096 LL054 $49,153,200 90.673 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0096 LL056 $30,600 0.598 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0096 LL057 $819,200 34.331 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001004 $0 0.198 TU VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001006 $0 0.326 TU VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001007 $15,600 0.472 TU VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001008 $0 0.407 TU VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001030 $0 0.649 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100%
  68. 68. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00960001031 $12,000 0.320 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001032 $76,400 0.365 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001037 $8,000 0.246 IND VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001039 $0 0.227 TU VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001041 $8,000 0.223 IND VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001042 $0 0.232 TU VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001043 $0 0.228 TU VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960001044 $595,500 1.292 IND 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002001 $1,772,000 2.571 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002004 $87,400 0.246 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002005 $81,200 0.227 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002006 $101,400 0.220 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002007 $20,400 0.236 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002008 $68,000 0.225 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002009 $18,800 0.237 VAC 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002010 $80,200 0.186 RES VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002011 $53,400 0.162 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002012 $39,300 0.123 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002013 $55,800 0.211 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002014 $41,300 0.247 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002015 $18,800 0.218 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002016 $18,800 0.231 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002020 $12,400 0.099 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002021 $73,700 0.231 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002022 $18,800 0.238 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002023 $64,900 0.236 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002024 $79,300 0.249 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960002025 $18,800 0.222 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002026 $62,500 0.231 RES VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960002027 $65,900 0.231 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002028 $97,700 0.241 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002030 $559,100 0.657 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960002031 $91,200 0.275 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960002032 $33,500 0.072 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960003012 $15,100 0.224 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100%
  69. 69. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00960003020 $791,500 1.773 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960003021 $369,000 0.609 IND 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960003022 $819,800 1.522 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960003024 $68,200 0.294 IND VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960003025 $103,100 0.316 PI 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960003026 $5,000 0.133 IND 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960003027 $164,800 0.175 IND 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960005002 $18,300 0.385 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960005003 $72,300 0.399 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960005006 $8,000 0.234 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960005007 $16,000 0.461 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960005011 $172,500 1.325 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960005012 $182,100 1.275 IND 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960005017 $98,700 0.410 PI VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00960005018 $0 2.975 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960005019 $109,700 0.513 COM VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960005020 $441,300 0.475 IND VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960005021 $218,000 1.317 PI VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00960005022 $259,500 0.553 PI VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00960005023 $100,100 0.560 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960005024 $20,300 0.510 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960005025 $21,800 0.595 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960006001 $70,500 0.260 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960006002 $976,700 1.188 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960006003 $592,600 1.086 COM VAC 4 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960006004 $298,700 0.470 COM VAC 1 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960006005 $388,600 0.699 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00960006009 $141,900 1.484 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960006011 $176,500 0.469 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00960006012 $1,223,600 2.216 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960006013 $59,500 1.609 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960006014 $31,200 0.759 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00960006015 $223,100 0.922 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970008001 $278,100 1.029 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970008002 $53,800 0.262 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100%
  70. 70. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00970008003 $50,300 0.125 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008004 $168,100 0.322 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008005 $20,600 0.251 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008006 $19,600 0.448 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970008007 $88,200 0.230 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970008008 $92,100 0.244 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008009 $17,300 0.162 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008010 $91,300 0.199 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008011 $96,800 0.225 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008012 $81,300 0.182 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008013 $16,700 0.133 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008014 $101,000 0.334 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00970008015 $96,900 0.664 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00970008018 $340,700 0.458 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970008019 $64,000 0.250 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008020 $41,500 0.206 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008021 $18,800 0.215 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008022 $18,800 0.245 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008023 $50,900 0.133 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008024 $266,200 0.469 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970008026 $59,100 0.260 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008027 $19,500 0.192 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970008028 $82,000 0.292 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970009002 $78,000 0.317 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009003 $81,100 0.220 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009004 $21,500 0.350 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970009005 $24,200 0.445 COM 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00970009006 $276,500 0.475 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009007 $818,300 0.466 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00970009008 $459,200 0.435 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00970009010 $21,500 0.362 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009011 $18,800 0.241 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009012 $55,800 0.215 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009013 $33,300 0.256 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009014 $18,800 0.208 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25%
  71. 71. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00970009015 $54,200 0.234 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009016 $18,800 0.214 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009017 $18,800 0.235 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009018 $18,800 0.218 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009019 $18,800 0.235 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009020 $18,800 0.232 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009021 $16,100 0.134 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009022 $21,500 0.332 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009023 $81,600 0.446 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009024 $55,200 0.112 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00970009025 $497,200 0.920 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 0098 LL013 $1,104,600 1.073 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 0098 LL014 $307,800 0.982 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980001045 $899,200 0.224 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980001061 $219,500 0.497 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980001062 $132,600 0.212 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980001063 $157,300 0.435 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980001068 $255,000 0.498 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980001069 $429,900 0.351 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980001070 $492,600 0.525 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980001071 $244,100 0.381 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980001XXX 0.382 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980002007 $61,400 0.175 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980002011 $7,300 0.156 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980002012 $6,000 0.169 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980002029 $193,000 0.189 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980002030 $197,800 0.187 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980002031 $312,400 0.539 RES VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00980002032 $916,800 0.704 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004012 $52,800 0.187 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004013 $25,400 0.195 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004016 $303,000 0.202 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004017 $25,200 0.194 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004018 $20,200 0.201 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004019 $51,400 0.173 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100%
  72. 72. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00980004020 $20,000 0.170 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980004021 $130,500 0.165 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004022 $260,700 0.167 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004026 $413,400 0.542 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004027 $104,600 0.125 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980004028 $76,000 0.160 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005001 $0 0.381 COM VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980005002 $0 0.491 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005004 $196,400 0.146 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005007 $155,900 0.174 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005008 $159,900 0.195 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005009 $29,100 0.218 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005010 $118,100 0.250 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005011 $21,400 0.213 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005012 $18,800 0.186 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005013 $57,100 0.210 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005020 $100,700 0.082 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005021 $9,000 0.083 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005022 $186,500 0.388 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980005XXX 0.026 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980006001 $137,500 0.295 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980006002 $118,300 0.333 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980006003 $312,300 0.920 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980006021 $125,500 0.317 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980006033 $21,000 0.321 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980006034 $15,000 0.169 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980006048 $1,431,200 3.540 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980007004 $74,100 0.287 COM 1 1 0 1 1 75% 14 00980007007 $97,700 0.289 COM 1 1 0 1 1 75% 14 00980007008 $58,100 0.290 COM 1 1 0 1 1 75% 14 00980007020 $228,500 0.514 COM 1 1 0 1 1 75% 14 00980008001 $47,500 0.061 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980008002 $112,600 0.257 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980008003 $118,600 0.225 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980008004 $53,700 0.209 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25%
  73. 73. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00980008007 $127,900 0.200 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980008008 $120,500 0.220 COM VAC 4 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980008009 $66,900 0.217 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980008034 $104,500 0.311 COM VAC 4 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980008035 $175,700 0.387 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980009035 $900 0.084 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980009036 $400 0.039 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980009037 $6,500 0.217 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980009040 $10,100 0.126 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980009041 $2,100 0.068 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980009047 $2,553,400 2.486 COM 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980009048 $254,400 4.241 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980011011 $226,000 0.951 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980011012 $93,400 0.641 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980011013 $41,700 0.841 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980011014 $72,000 0.224 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980011015 $72,100 0.283 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980011018 $39,300 1.037 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980013001 $24,300 0.316 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980013016 $26,000 0.304 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980013017 $23,900 0.244 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980013020 $656,800 0.525 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980015001 $129,500 0.241 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980015019 $24,000 0.280 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980015020 $59,400 0.327 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980015022 $555,300 0.623 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980015023 $162,800 0.361 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980016004 $91,100 0.190 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00980016005 $58,600 0.142 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00980016006 $146,700 0.293 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980016007 $84,300 0.271 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980016008 $148,000 0.376 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980016009 $110,600 0.376 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980016010 $134,700 0.399 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980016011 $166,700 0.574 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25%
  74. 74. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00980016012 $230,300 0.383 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980016013 $296,300 0.667 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980016028 $542,400 1.011 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980016029 $193,600 0.996 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980017001 $345,700 0.672 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017011 $311,500 0.626 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017012 $92,400 0.350 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017013 $109,100 0.339 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017014 $233,500 0.682 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017015 $101,400 0.343 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017016 $121,900 0.338 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980017017 $142,200 0.691 COM VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980017020 $170,300 0.577 IND 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980017021 $239,300 0.274 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017023 $53,000 0.233 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980017024 $72,900 0.265 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980017025 $164,200 0.334 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017026 $144,800 0.904 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980017030 $59,100 0.067 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017031 $178,200 0.346 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980017032 $572,500 1.076 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980018005 $65,800 0.284 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980018006 $16,100 0.255 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980018009 $66,000 0.196 PI 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980018013 $74,600 0.172 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980018014 $141,100 0.188 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980018015 $38,100 0.166 COM VAC 1 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980018016 $63,900 0.154 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980018017 $63,600 0.192 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980018022 $192,100 0.496 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980018023 $93,000 0.445 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980018024 $85,300 0.235 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980018026 $699,000 1.552 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019003 $38,700 0.314 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980019004 $77,600 0.162 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25%
  75. 75. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00980019005 $13,100 0.166 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980019006 $73,500 0.168 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019007 $78,200 0.168 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019008 $27,200 0.313 PI VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980019009 $27,400 0.213 PI VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980019010 $20,600 0.040 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00980019011 $79,200 0.073 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980019012 $67,700 0.037 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019013 $109,700 0.083 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980019014 $83,300 0.111 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019017 $73,200 0.294 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019021 $70,200 0.195 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019022 $168,100 0.117 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019024 $17,300 0.093 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980019025 $129,500 0.120 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019026 $334,200 1.105 IND 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019027 $256,600 0.172 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019028 $140,300 0.170 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980019029 $69,300 0.133 COM 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980019030 $140,800 0.464 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980020001 $263,200 1.123 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020002 $193,500 0.542 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020005 $113,500 0.246 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020006 $55,300 0.275 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020007 $30,200 0.239 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020008 $19,100 0.124 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020009 $196,400 0.144 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020010 $99,000 0.035 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020011 $159,200 0.036 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020012 $125,400 0.035 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020013 $94,100 0.035 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020014 $72,600 0.077 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020015 $18,000 0.082 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020016 $47,000 0.034 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020017 $42,100 0.068 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25%
  76. 76. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00980020018 $38,800 0.038 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020019 $8,800 0.043 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020020 $100,700 0.140 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020030 $6,400 0.201 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980020031 $9,500 0.262 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980020032 $19,300 0.252 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980020033 $20,100 0.285 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980020034 $19,200 0.061 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980020035 $21,000 0.321 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980020036 $55,900 0.238 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020037 $80,900 0.286 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020038 $97,000 0.272 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020039 $6,600 0.034 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020041 $279,600 0.337 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020048 $847,100 1.751 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020049 $30,400 0.307 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020050 $290,000 0.318 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020051 $1,281,400 1.339 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020052 $123,900 0.217 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980020053 $79,100 0.316 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980021016 $111,300 0.192 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980021017 $105,300 0.206 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980021018 $27,300 0.244 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980021019 $71,900 0.206 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980021020 $92,200 0.300 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021021 $72,900 0.164 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021022 $17,700 0.181 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021023 $222,800 0.190 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021024 $61,800 0.186 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021026 $190,600 1.056 PI 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980021030 $27,800 0.592 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021039 $15,800 0.271 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980021042 $57,300 0.902 PI 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00980021043 $71,900 0.821 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021047 $88,800 0.255 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100%
  77. 77. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00980021049 $107,900 0.192 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021050 $65,400 0.176 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021051 $86,400 0.209 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021052 $41,100 0.064 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021053 $665,600 1.327 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00980021054 0.820 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021055 $272,200 0.240 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021056 0.060 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00980021057 0.112 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0099 LL017 $14,400 0.484 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001003 $106,100 0.866 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001004 $21,700 0.818 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001005 $101,400 0.766 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001006 $73,800 0.729 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001007 $61,800 0.645 RES VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001012 $138,700 0.437 COM VAC 1 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001015 $106,400 0.660 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001016 $139,600 0.691 RES 4 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001017 $71,900 0.351 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001018 $90,300 0.365 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001019 $110,500 0.742 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001020 $98,300 0.816 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001021 $70,500 0.435 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001022 $50,300 1.001 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001023 $57,000 1.396 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001034 $13,600 0.402 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001057 $73,200 0.693 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001060 $13,500 0.712 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001061 $75,200 0.903 RES VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001075 $70,800 2.791 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001083 $22,000 0.382 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001084 $120,000 0.437 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001088 $96,000 1.250 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001091 $54,600 1.079 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001092 $2,491,200 3.882 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100%
  78. 78. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00990001093 $93,300 1.101 COM VAC 1 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990001094 $1,017,700 1.005 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001095 $737,500 2.939 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001096 $43,500 0.319 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990001097 $35,600 0.902 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001098 $26,400 1.788 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001099 $158,600 1.285 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990001100 $584,200 3.293 COM VAC 1 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990002130 $82,400 0.140 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990003040 $246,800 0.136 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990003042 $198,800 0.771 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990003043 $50,100 0.186 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990003044 $60,700 0.186 RES 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990003045 $72,800 0.225 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003063 $67,400 0.168 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 00990003094 $23,900 0.336 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990003104 $108,000 0.612 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990003112 $228,100 0.781 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990003116 $157,600 0.305 COM VAC 1 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003120 $537,200 0.666 PI 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 00990003122 $252,200 1.054 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990003124 0.007 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003125 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003126 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003127 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003128 0.006 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003129 0.007 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003130 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003131 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003132 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003133 0.006 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003134 0.007 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003135 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003136 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003137 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50%
  79. 79. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 00990003138 0.006 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003139 0.007 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003140 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003141 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003142 0.008 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003143 0.006 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990003C01 $69,800 0.762 RES 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 00990004070 $27,900 0.790 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004071 $28,500 0.788 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004080 $13,500 0.403 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004081 $13,500 0.405 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004082 $13,500 0.373 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004089 $325,500 1.106 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004102 $1,600 0.017 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004104 $35,800 0.689 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004110 $9,800 0.166 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004117 $17,500 0.072 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004120 $1,157,800 1.304 COM VAC 4 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004121 $240,900 0.755 COM VAC 4 1 1 1 1 100% 14 00990004127 $193,300 0.736 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 0127 LL073 $1,502,700 5.161 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0127 LL074 $9,622,000 4.867 COM VAC 1 1 0 1 0 50% 14 0127 LL084 $4,741,700 4.113 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 0127 LL086 $360,000 1.079 PI 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 0127 LL100 $615,200 1.824 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0127 LL105 $996,200 4.149 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0127 LL111 $77,100 2.871 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0127 LL112 $439,100 2.100 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 0127 LL113 $119,200 0.629 COM VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270001001 $33,500 0.272 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270001002 $38,600 0.272 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270001003 $47,600 0.252 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270001019 $26,800 0.057 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270001020 $59,100 0.183 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270001022 $57,100 0.156 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50%
  80. 80. Blight Statistics in the LRA Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total TOTALS: 549 $148,771,000 383.950 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100% 37.7% 61.0% 35.5% 59% AVG Parcel ID Number Tax Value Acres Land Use Occupancy Status Building Condition Pervasive Poverty Under- Developed General Distress Blighted G Total 14 01270001023 $34,000 0.104 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270001024 $3,100 0.015 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270001025 $26,400 0.091 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270001026 $47,300 0.103 RES 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270001XXX 0.526 IND VAC 4 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270002036 $8,300 0.136 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270002037 $26,400 0.152 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270002042 $571,800 3.152 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270003067 $167,200 0.371 COM VAC 2 1 1 1 0 75% 14 01270003068 $278,600 0.373 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270004026 $33,900 0.122 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270004027 $230,100 0.422 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270004033 $663,000 0.895 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270004034 $47,900 0.149 COM 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270004035 $174,300 0.251 COM 3 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270004036 $130,100 0.301 COM 2 1 0 1 0 50% 14 01270004037 $350,600 0.898 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270006002 $102,200 0.328 IND 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270006003 $47,000 0.231 IND 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270006017 $251,700 0.304 IND VAC 3 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270006019 $38,700 0.194 IND VAC 4 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270006021 $30,400 0.363 VAC VAC VAC 1 1 1 1 100% 14 01270006023 $11,300 0.060 IND 1 1 0 0 0 25% 14 01270006024 $335,100 1.663 IND 1 1 0 0 0 25%

×