This document provides an overview of current treatment and updates on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). It begins with definitions of NAFLD and NASH. It then discusses the prevalence of NAFLD globally and in Asian countries. Risk factors and the pathogenesis involving the gut microbiota and a potential role in lean NASH are reviewed. Current methods for diagnosis including laboratory tests, imaging, serum biomarkers, and liver biopsy are summarized. Current treatment options including lifestyle modifications, metformin, pioglitazone, and vitamin E are mentioned. Several newer potential treatment approaches are also listed. The role of transient elastography in management is
NAFLD is a vast topic and recently gaining a lot of importance. Fatty liver, NASH, are other topics discussed here. sleissenger, sheila sherlock and Harrisons are used for reference
NAFLD is a vast topic and recently gaining a lot of importance. Fatty liver, NASH, are other topics discussed here. sleissenger, sheila sherlock and Harrisons are used for reference
An updated review on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, treatment modalities and current clinical trials are reviewed.
New England Journal of Medicine review article from November 2017 entitled "Cause, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis" was extensively cited, please see references on the last slide (DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1503519).
This is purely for educational purposes; I do not diagnose, treat, or offer patient-specific advice by sharing these slides.
Diabetes and Gut interplay
By Dr. Usama Ragab Youssif
In Gastro Canal Association Annual Conference
Agenda
Diabetes as the main player
Gut as the main player
Diabetes and gut in a separate game
Gut as game changer
Tips and tricks: diabetes drugs
Evolving diets in GI Disease 2019 Raymond/GallagherPatricia Raymond
As presented 09/2019 at RMSGNA: In the 50's , doctors recommended smoking for your health. More recently gastroenterologists told patients with ulcers to drink milk and eat bread to heal.
Are you using new science based dietary information for your patients? It's time to update your timeworn dietary strategies and handouts. Join us and review the science on recent advances in dietary management for gastrointestinal disorders: Fatty liver, IBS, IBD, Gastroparesis, Post gastric bypass, Diverticulosis, Cirrhosis, and more!
Examine historical misinformation in dietary management of gastrointestinal disorders
Describe the emerging evidence supporting the primary role of dietary therapies in digestive disease including Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Gastroparesis, Pancreatitis, Post-Gastric Bypass, and Diverticulitis.
Identify the role of the Registered Dietitian and the importance of a multi-disciplinary approach to the management of digestives diseases
Clinical, laboratory and histological associations in clinical, laboratory an...Dr. sreeremya S
Clinical, laboratory and histological associations in clinical, laboratory and histological associations in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V PREVENTIVE-PEDIATRICS.pdfSachin Sharma
This content provides an overview of preventive pediatrics. It defines preventive pediatrics as preventing disease and promoting children's physical, mental, and social well-being to achieve positive health. It discusses antenatal, postnatal, and social preventive pediatrics. It also covers various child health programs like immunization, breastfeeding, ICDS, and the roles of organizations like WHO, UNICEF, and nurses in preventive pediatrics.
Telehealth Psychology Building Trust with Clients.pptxThe Harvest Clinic
Telehealth psychology is a digital approach that offers psychological services and mental health care to clients remotely, using technologies like video conferencing, phone calls, text messaging, and mobile apps for communication.
The dimensions of healthcare quality refer to various attributes or aspects that define the standard of healthcare services. These dimensions are used to evaluate, measure, and improve the quality of care provided to patients. A comprehensive understanding of these dimensions ensures that healthcare systems can address various aspects of patient care effectively and holistically. Dimensions of Healthcare Quality and Performance of care include the following; Appropriateness, Availability, Competence, Continuity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Efficacy, Prevention, Respect and Care, Safety as well as Timeliness.
CRISPR-Cas9, a revolutionary gene-editing tool, holds immense potential to reshape medicine, agriculture, and our understanding of life. But like any powerful tool, it comes with ethical considerations.
Unveiling CRISPR: This naturally occurring bacterial defense system (crRNA & Cas9 protein) fights viruses. Scientists repurposed it for precise gene editing (correction, deletion, insertion) by targeting specific DNA sequences.
The Promise: CRISPR offers exciting possibilities:
Gene Therapy: Correcting genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis.
Agriculture: Engineering crops resistant to pests and harsh environments.
Research: Studying gene function to unlock new knowledge.
The Peril: Ethical concerns demand attention:
Off-target Effects: Unintended DNA edits can have unforeseen consequences.
Eugenics: Misusing CRISPR for designer babies raises social and ethical questions.
Equity: High costs could limit access to this potentially life-saving technology.
The Path Forward: Responsible development is crucial:
International Collaboration: Clear guidelines are needed for research and human trials.
Public Education: Open discussions ensure informed decisions about CRISPR.
Prioritize Safety and Ethics: Safety and ethical principles must be paramount.
CRISPR offers a powerful tool for a better future, but responsible development and addressing ethical concerns are essential. By prioritizing safety, fostering open dialogue, and ensuring equitable access, we can harness CRISPR's power for the benefit of all. (2998 characters)
How many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdfpubrica101
Pubrica’s team of researchers and writers create scientific and medical research articles, which may be important resources for authors and practitioners. Pubrica medical writers assist you in creating and revising the introduction by alerting the reader to gaps in the chosen study subject. Our professionals understand the order in which the hypothesis topic is followed by the broad subject, the issue, and the backdrop.
https://pubrica.com/academy/case-study-or-series/how-many-patients-does-case-series-should-have-in-comparison-to-case-reports/
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
Medical Technology Tackles New Health Care Demand - Research Report - March 2...pchutichetpong
M Capital Group (“MCG”) predicts that with, against, despite, and even without the global pandemic, the medical technology (MedTech) industry shows signs of continuous healthy growth, driven by smaller, faster, and cheaper devices, growing demand for home-based applications, technological innovation, strategic acquisitions, investments, and SPAC listings. MCG predicts that this should reflects itself in annual growth of over 6%, well beyond 2028.
According to Chris Mouchabhani, Managing Partner at M Capital Group, “Despite all economic scenarios that one may consider, beyond overall economic shocks, medical technology should remain one of the most promising and robust sectors over the short to medium term and well beyond 2028.”
There is a movement towards home-based care for the elderly, next generation scanning and MRI devices, wearable technology, artificial intelligence incorporation, and online connectivity. Experts also see a focus on predictive, preventive, personalized, participatory, and precision medicine, with rising levels of integration of home care and technological innovation.
The average cost of treatment has been rising across the board, creating additional financial burdens to governments, healthcare providers and insurance companies. According to MCG, cost-per-inpatient-stay in the United States alone rose on average annually by over 13% between 2014 to 2021, leading MedTech to focus research efforts on optimized medical equipment at lower price points, whilst emphasizing portability and ease of use. Namely, 46% of the 1,008 medical technology companies in the 2021 MedTech Innovator (“MTI”) database are focusing on prevention, wellness, detection, or diagnosis, signaling a clear push for preventive care to also tackle costs.
In addition, there has also been a lasting impact on consumer and medical demand for home care, supported by the pandemic. Lockdowns, closure of care facilities, and healthcare systems subjected to capacity pressure, accelerated demand away from traditional inpatient care. Now, outpatient care solutions are driving industry production, with nearly 70% of recent diagnostics start-up companies producing products in areas such as ambulatory clinics, at-home care, and self-administered diagnostics.
One of the most developed cities of India, the city of Chennai is the capital of Tamilnadu and many people from different parts of India come here to earn their bread and butter. Being a metropolitan, the city is filled with towering building and beaches but the sad part as with almost every Indian city
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair A New Horizon in Nephrology.pptxR3 Stem Cell
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair: A New Horizon in Nephrology" explores groundbreaking advancements in the use of R3 stem cells for kidney disease treatment. This insightful piece delves into the potential of these cells to regenerate damaged kidney tissue, offering new hope for patients and reshaping the future of nephrology.
2. INDEX
Introduction
Prevalence
Risk Factor
New Nomenclature MAFLD
Pathogenesis
Gut Microbiota, LEAN NASH
Diagnosis
Current Treatment –Metformin ,
Pioglitazone, VIT E, UDCA
August 25, 2023
| 2
Newer approaches
• OCA
• Lubiprostone
• DMR
• DPP4
• Saroglitazar
• Elafibrinor
• Empagliflozin
• Fecal Microbiota
Transplantation
• Current and Potential future
drugs
3. Definitions (1/2)
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
Accumulation of fat in the liver in the absence of recent or ongoing intake of significant
amount of alcohol (alcohol intake up to 20 g/day both for males and females)
NAFLD
Primary
NAFLD is primary if
other secondary causes
of hepatic steatosis have
been excluded
Secondary
Hepatitis C virus, various
inborn errors of
metabolism, total
parenteral nutrition,
various medications,
surgical procedures etc.
Duseja J, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
4. Definitions (2/2)
Shutterstock ID: 286407365
Fat Deposition in
Liver
The macrovesicular
steatosis that
occupies at least 5%
of the hepatocytes
Simple Steatosis
Presence of fat in the
liver with or without
the presence of
lobular inflammation
on histology
Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis or NASH
Steatosis and inflammation are associated with the
presence of one of the following 3 additional features on
liver histology:
Ballooning of hepatocytes
Mallory hyaline bodies
Fibrosis
Duseja J, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
6. Prevalence in Asian Countries
Prevalence (%) of NAFLD in different Asian
countries are as follows1:
Prevalence of NASH in patients with biopsy-proven
NAFLD is 63.5%3
China 15%-40%
India 30%
Japan 25%-30%
Korea 27%
Affects around a quarter of the Asian adult population.1
NAFLD
epidemic in
Asia1,2
Obesity
Metabolic
syndrome
Urbanisation
Sedentary lifestyle
Western diet
1. Fan JG, et al. J Hepatol. 2017;67(4):862-873.
2. Pati GK, et al. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2016;6(2):154-162.
3. Younossi ZM, et al. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73-84.
NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease;
NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
10. The two most important and significant
differences between MAFLD and NAFLD are,
MAFLD diagnosis does not require exclusion of
patients with alcohol intake, or other chronic liver
diseases and the presence of metabolic abnormality
is necessary for diagnosis of MAFLD
MAFLD = NAFLD Journal of Hepatology 2020 vol. 73 : 202–209
13. “Multi-hit” Hypothesis
Multiple insults acting together on genetically predisposed patient (insulin
resistance, altered gut bacteria, inflammatory cytokines..etc)
Not necessarily a linear progression from simple steatosis to NASH
Currently most accepted understanding of NAFLD
14. Gut microbiota :Pathogenesis of NAFLD
(1) increased production and absorption of gut short-chain fatty acids;
(2) altered dietary choline metabolism by the microbiota;
(3) altered bile acid pools by the microbiota;
(4) increased delivery of microbiota derived ethanol to liver;
(5) gut permeability alterations and release of endotoxin
(6) interaction between specific diet and microbiota
August 25, 2023 14
15. LEAN NASH
• The underlying pathophysiology of lean NAFLD may be quite different.
• Genetic predispositions, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet, visceral adiposity and
dyslipidaemia have potential roles in the pathogenic underpinnings.
• Lean NAFLD may pose a risk for metabolic disturbances, cardiovascular
morbidity or overall mortality.
• Secondary causes of hepatic steatosis are also needed to be ruled out in lean
subjects with NAFLD.
• The effectiveness of various treatment modalities, such as exercise and
pharmacotherapy, on lean NAFLD is not known.
• Weight loss is expected to help lean NAFLD patients who have visceral obesity
• Further investigation is needed for many aspects of lean NAFLD, including
mechanistic pathogenesis, risk assessment, natural history and therapeutic
approach
August 25, 2023 15
16.
17. Always Look for Diabetic Liver
• Up to 75% patients with NASH have diabetes mellitus
• Obese, middle-aged females with DM – more likely to have fatty liver changes on
ultrasonography (upto 70%)
• History of DM associated with a 2.6 fold increase in the risk of NASH
• Diabetes and body mass index are associated with fibrosis progression
1. Dabhi AS. JIACM. 2008; 9(1): 36 – 41
2. Yu AS. Rev. Gastroenterol. Disord. 2002; 2(1): 11 - 19
18. Diagnosis of NAFLD
NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver
1. Dyson JK, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
2. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Stock vector ID: 551095132
19. Laboratory Investigations
Liver Function Tests1,2
•Mildly elevated
transaminases (ALT>AST)
and/or GGT
•However, majority (79%)
have normal ALT levels
•ALT levels are poor
predictors of NAFLD
Other Blood Tests3
•Fasting and postprandial
blood glucose
•Testing for insulin resistance
– HOMA-IR or 2-hour
glucose tolerance test
•Serum triglycerides
•HDL
•Hepatitis B surface antigen
•Antibodies to hepatitis C
virus
Further Work-up Depending
on the Age of the Patient3
•Autoimmune markers – ANA
and ASMA
•Coeliac disease work-up
•Serum iron profile
•Serum ceruloplasmin
Stock photo ID: 749463244 Stock photo ID: 441264445
1. Dyson JK, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
2. Browning JD, et al. Hepatology. 2004;40(6):1387-1395.
3. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
ALT, alanine transaminase; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ASMA, anti-smooth
muscle antibody; AST, aspartate aminotransaminase; GGT, gamma glutamyl
transferase; HDL, high density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homoeostatic model
assessment-insulin resistance; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
20. Noninvasive Imaging of Steatosis (1/2)
Abdominal ultrasound1,2
First-line investigation for patients with suspected hepatic steatosis
Qualitative assessment of fatty infiltration of liver
Presence of >33% fat on liver biopsy, optimal for detection of
steatosis by ultrasound
Characteristic sonographic features3:
Attenuation of image quickly within 4 to 5 cm
of depth, making deeper structures, difficult
to decipher
• Echogenic diffusely but particularly
important to note brightness within the
first 2 to 3 cm of depth
• Liver is uniformly heterogeneous
• Thick subcutaneous depth (>2 cm)
• Liver fills entire field with no edges visible
(viewed as helpful but not necessary for
diagnosis)
Attenuation of image (green arrow),
diffuse echogenicity, uniform heterogeneous
liver, thick subcutaneous depth (yellow arrow)
and enlarged liver filling the entire field.
Source: Khov N, 2014.
1. Dyson JK, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
2. Saadeh S, et al. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(3):745-50.
3. Khov N, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(22):6821-6825.
21. • Computed tomography scan abdomen1
• Not routinely used
• Magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance
spectroscopy2,3
• Used to quantify fat content
• Provides a good accuracy for grading severity of steatosis
However, none of the imaging modalities can differentiate between steatosis and NASH.4
Noninvasive Imaging of Steatosis (2/2)
NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
1. Dyson JK, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
2. Schwenzer NF, et al. J Hepatol. 2009;51(3):433-445.
3. McPherson S, et al. J Hepatol. 2009;51(2):389-397.
4. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
22. Serum Biomarkers
• Biomarkers can be used in differentiating simple
steatosis from NASH1
• But, biomarkers are still under evaluation1
• Potential biomarkers: cytokeratin-18 and terminal
peptide of procollagen III1
NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
1. Dyson JK, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
2. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.
Stock photo ID: 615791984
Serum biomarkers can be an acceptable alternative for diagnosis of steatosis when
imaging modalities are not available.2
23. Noninvasive Tests of Fibrosis
Staging of hepatic fibrosis is necessary in all patients with NAFLD1
1. Dyson JK, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
2. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
3. Rockey DC. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(1):8-14.
ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase;
NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Transient elastography1,2,3
• It is the only imaging modality that
can detect liver fibrosis
• It gives the measurement of liver
stiffness which correlates well with
degree of fibrosis
Simple noninvasive tests of
fibrosis1
The following scores can be used
to exclude advanced fibrosis and
can identify patients with mild
disease:
• NAFLD fibrosis score: age,
hyperglycaemia, body mass
index, platelet count, albumin,
AST/ALT ratio
• BARD score: body mass index,
AST/ALT ratio, type 2 diabetes
mellitus
• FIB-4 score: age, AST, ALT
Source: Rockey DC, 2008
24.
25. Fibroscan
Transient elastography that evaluates liver stiffness using pulse-echo ultrasound
Non invasive
More sensitive than serologic markers
Evaluates a larger part of liver
Main weakness is interference with by steatosis with wave velocity
Might be unreliable in obese
26.
27. In patients with normal ALT and liver stiffness value <6.0
kPa, no treatment is required, whereas those with liver
stiffness values >9.0 kPa should be considered for
treatment.
In patients with ALT 1-5x ULN, those patients with liver
stiffness value <7.5 kPa can be observed, whereas those
with value >12.0kPa should be considered for treatment.
In patients with liver stiffness values outside these criteria,
liver biopsy should be considered.
28. Liver Biopsy
Indications for liver biopsy1
Age >45 years
Female gender
AST/ALT ratio >1
High AST/platelet ratio index
Diabetes mellitus or metabolic
syndrome
High CK 18
High NAFLD fibrosis score
High liver stiffness measurement
Histological definition of adult
NASH2,3
Combination of 3 lesions
(steatosis, ballooning and
lobular inflammation) within a
characteristic topographical
distribution, mainly
centrilobular, zone 3 of the acini
It is the only useful modality for assessing severity of disease in patients with NAFLD.1
Haematoxylin and Eosin image of NASH; Ballooned
hepatocytes (long arrow) and mixed inflammation including
neutrophils (short arrow).4
Source: Spengler EK, 2015.
NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease; NASH, non-alcoholic
steatohepatitis.
1. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
2. Ratziu V, et al. J Hepatol. 2010;53(2):372-384.
3. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.
4. Spengler EK, et al. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2015;90(9):1233-1246.
29. NAFLD Activity Score or NAS
Diagnosis of NASH
• NAS score ≥5 with steatosis and ballooning
• Lower NAS scores in the presence of steatosis and ballooning also
indicates NASH
NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
Dyson JK, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
30. Management of NAFLD
• Exercise1
Exercise regimen for a minimum of 45 minutes, 5 days per week
Achieve a target heart rate of 60% to 70% of the maximal heart rate
Exercises can include brisk walking, jogging or rhythmic aerobic
exercises
Weight reduction2
10% of the body weight to be reduced in 6 to 8 months
1. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
2. Farrell GC, et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(5):307-318.
Successful outcome depends on a behavioural change in the patient who needs to follow it on a
long-term basis.2
Lifestyle modifications
NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease.
31. Role of LSM in NAFLD
LSM IS THE CORNERSTONE OF NAFLD MANAGEMENT
EXERCISE AND
CALORIC
RESTRICTION
INDUCING
WEIGHT LOSS
ARE NEEDED TO
IMPROVE NAFLD
32. Pharmacotherapy of NASH
1. Ratziu V, et al. J Hepatol. 2010;53(2):372-384.
2. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.
3. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
4. Gawrieh S, et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(3):338-348.
• Indications of pharmacotherapy1,2
1. NASH with significant fibrosis (stage F2 and higher)
2. Early-stage NASH with increased risk of fibrosis progression (age: >50 years, diabetes,
metabolic syndrome and increased ALT)
3. Active NASH with high necro-inflammatory activity
• Pharmacotherapy is not recommended for bland steatosis and NASH with no or minimal
fibrosis (stage 0 or 1).1
• Placebo controlled RCTs have tested drugs for NAFLD as an add on to LSM,
demonstrating better response with LSM + Pharmacotherapy vs LSM alone
NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
33. Pharmacotherapy of NASH
1. Ratziu V, et al. J Hepatol. 2010;53(2):372-384.
2. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.
3. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
4. Gawrieh S, et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(3):338-348.
Drugs - I
• Vitamin E
• Pioglitazone
• These are Recommended
for non-diabetic patients
with histological NASH
Drugs - II
• Ursodeoxycholic acid
• Metformin
• Pentoxifylline
• Angiotensin antagonists
• Long-chain
polyunsaturated fatty
acids
• Fibrates
NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
34. Pioglitazone and Vitamin E (1/2)
1. Sanyal AJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1675-1685.
2. Gawrieh S, et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(3):338-348.
3. Boettcher E, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(1):66-75.
A total of 247 patients with NASH and without diabetes were involved;
they were classified into groups such as pioglitazone 30 mg daily, vitamin
E 800 IU daily or placebo for 96 weeks1
However, a meta-analysis (2012) of 4 good-quality RCTs showed that pioglitazone might
reverse fibrosis in NASH.3
Vitamin E and pioglitazone were associated with reduction in steatosis, lobular inflammation
and NAFLD activity scores; there was no effect on fibrosis scores.1,2
Source: Gawrieh S, 2015
HB, hepatocyte ballooning; LI, lobular inflammation; NAFLD,
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, non-alcoholic
steatohepatitis; RCTs, randomised controlled trials.
35. Safety Concerns
• Might increase all-cause mortality at
dose >400 IU/day1
• Increases risk of haemorrhagic stroke2
• Increases risk of prostate cancer
(randomised controlled trial)3
Vitamin E1,2,3
• Causes weight gain
• Evidence on long-term efficacy and
safety is lacking
Pioglitazone4,5
Stock photo ID: 527363797
1. Miller ER 3rd, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):37-46.
2. Schurks M, et al. BMJ. 2010;341:c5702.
3. Klein EA, et al. JAMA. 2011;306(14):1549-1556.
4. Sanyal AJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1675-1685.
5. Gitto S, et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:732870.
36. Ursodeoxycholic Acid
1. Duseja A, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
2. Duseja A, et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(9):2368-2374.
3. Ratziu V, et al. J Hepatol. 2011;54(5):1011-1019.
• Protects against hepatocyte injury by decreasing bile acids1
• Reduces oxidative stress in patients with NAFLD1
Duseja A (2007)
• Prospective study
• A total of 74% of patients with NAFLD achieved biochemical response
with ursodeoxycholic acid (300 mg twice a day) and lifestyle
modifications
ALT, alanine transaminase; NAFLD,
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH,
non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
37. Ratziu V (2011)
• Randomised controlled trial (UDCA 28-35 mg/kg/day)
• High dose of ursodeoxycholic acid (28-35 mg/kg/day) versus placebo in NASH
patients for 12 months
• Reduced mean ALT levels from baseline and serum fibrosis markers
(P<.001)
• Improved markers of glycaemic control and insulin resistance
Ursodeoxycholic Acid
38. • UDCA significantly improves liver function tests in NAFLD.
• High doses of UDCA is seen to cause significant improvements in ALT,
GGT and liver fibrosis in NASH patients
• Pharmacological therapy for NASH could be a 1- to 2-year therapy with
glitazones or Vitamin E in combination with high-dose UDCA.
Ursodeoxycholic Acid – API recommendations
39. Ursodeoxycholic Acid - Systematic Review Analysis
Monotherapy with
UDCA
•Significantly improved liver function in 5 studies and even improved steatosis and
fibrosis in 2 of them.
•Alleviated metabolic markers in NASH patients.
Combination
therapies with UDCA
•Significantly improved liver function while there was improvement in steatosis and
inflammation in 2 of them
High-dose UDCA
•Significantly improved ALT, ¥GT, and liver fibrosis.
•Reduces serum glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, and insulin concentrations and
triglycerides
UDCA monotherapy
and in combination
with vitamin E
•Significant improvement in ALT while the latter also led to alleviation of steatosis.
Xiang_2013
40. Indian experience with UDCA:
Three Indian Studies
2 Prospective & 1 Retrospective Study
•UDCA (300 mg BID) studied in 100
patients for 6 months
• 38% underwent biopsy,
•Outcome : biochemical response
•74% achieved biochemical response
• High dose UDCA (600 mg BID) in
23 NASH patients for 6 months
• All patients had Liver Biopsy
•Outcome measures were
improvement in ALT and liver
histology
•Biochemical improvement in all
•Histological in 13/23
• 57 NAFLD patients retrospectively
studied from 1996 and 2004
• Histologically confirmed NAFLD &
elevated ALT were included
• Comparator arms included Lifestyle
interventions, Lifestyle interventions
+ UDCA and Lifestyle interventions +
UDCA + Vitamin E
• UDCA dose: 300 mg BID
•All patients in combo group had
histological improvement
1. Duseja A, et al. The Clinicopathological Profile of Indian Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is Different from That in the West. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52:2368–2374.
2. Singh SP, et al. A pilot study of high dose UDCA in the treatment of NASH. Indian J Gastroenterol . 2007; Volume 26, Supplement 2.
3. Madan K, et al. Vitamin E-based therapy is effective in ameliorating transaminasemia in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Indian J Gastroenterol 2005;24:251-255
Study 2 Study 3
Study 1
41. Metformin
Haukeland JW, et al. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(7):853-860. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate
aminotransferase; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Randomised controlled trial, 48 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD,
metformin 500 mg/day (up to maximum 2500 or 3000 mg) versus placebo
No significant differences were observed between placebo and metformin in terms of change
in steatosis or liver enzyme levels.
42. Effects of Interventions in NAFLD
Weight Loss Insulin
Resistance
Liver Enzymes Inflammat
ion
Fibrosis
Lifestyle interventions Yes Yes Yes Yes Unproven
Vitamin E No No Yes Yes No
Pioglitazone Weight gain Yes Yes Yes Might be
beneficial
Ursodeoxycholic acid No Yes Yes Yes Might be
beneficial
Metformin Yes Yes No No No
Gitto S, et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:732870.
44. New therapeutic strategies in
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a focus
on promising drugs for nonalcoholic
steatohepatitis
New therapeutic strategies in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a focus
on promising drugs for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Natalia Pydyn 2020
45. Effects of OCA due to its binding to FXR in NAFLD/NASH
Florucci et al 2004 The Nuclear Receptor SHP Mediates Inhibition of Hepatic
Stellate Cells By FXR and Protects Against Liver Fibrosis
46. Phase 2 trial in NASH (FLINT)
Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for
non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT):
a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial 2014
47. Phase 3 trial in NASH (Regenerate)
August 25, 2023
Enter title via "insert>header and footer>footer" | 47
REGENERATE: Design of a pivotal, randomised, phase 3 study evaluating
the safety and efficacy of obeticholic acid in patients with fibrosis due to
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
https://www.globenews
wire.com/news-
release/2019/11/08/194
3921/0/en/New-
REGENERATE-Interim-
Analysis-Data-Presented-
at-The-Liver-Meeting-
Report-OCA-Impr
48. CDSCO APPROVAL
August 25, 2023
Enter title via "insert>header and footer>footer" | 48
CDSCO approval 2020 11/03/2020
49. LIVER INJURY IN RODENTS -2019
August 25, 2023
MECHANISM OF ACUTE LIVER DECOMPENSATION CAUSED BY
OBETICHOLIC ACID IN CHOLESTASIS IS FXR DEPENDENT
Adriana CarinoEnter title via "insert>header and footer>footer" |
49
50. Liver injury to CLD patient treated with OCA-2020
August 25, 2023
Liver Injury in Patients With Cholestatic
Liver Disease Treated With Obeticholic
Acidr title via "insert>header and footer>footer" |
50
The goal of this paper is to raise awareness of the
potential hepatotoxicity of OCA and add a note of caution to the use of OCA in
patients with decompensated disease.
Patients with PBC/PSC cirrhosis
with deterioration in liver function following OCA
use appear to develop jaundice without an impressive increase in liver enzymes.
About half of the patients progressed to liver failure, requiring liver
transplantation due to ACLF.
The long latency period presumably related to the dosing strategy raises the
possibility that this event may be dose-related. The current case series does not
allow us to estimate the incidence of DILI from OCA in comparison
to age, gender, and severity-matched PBC patients, but we anticipate that such
information would be available from the ongoing phase 4 COBALT study
(https://clini caltr ials.gov:/ct2/show/NCT02 308111).
Additional safety, efficacy, and pharmacology data are
needed before OCA is used in cirrhosis from PBC or
PSC.
51. Pruritus with OCA therapy
August 25, 2023
Practical strategiesfor pruritus
managementin the obeticholic acidtreated
patient with PBC: proceedings
from the 2018 expert panelEnter
51
After 1 year of treatment,
pruritus was reported by 56% of patients in the
5–10 mg group and 68% of patients in the 10 mg
group,
compared with 38% in the placebo group
Conclusion
Pruritus is a common symptom in patients with PBC
and may be exacerbated by PBC pharmacotherapy.
OCA has
shown a sustained efficacy and safety profile at 48
months, effectively improving liver biochemical
parameters in PBC. Pruritus associated with OCA
therapy is dose-dependent
and often manageable, and clinical studies show
that treatment discontinuation can be minimised
when pruritus is managed effectively.
52. OCA IMPACT ON LIPOPROTIEN PROFILE
August 25, 2023
tImpact of obeticholic acid on the lipoprotein profile in
patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitiser title via "insert>header and footer>footer" | 52
This study included 196 patients (99 OCA group and
97 placebo group) who were enrolled in the FLINT trial and
had samples available for lipid analysis and liver biopsies at
enrollment and end-of-treatment (EOT) at 72 weeks. Very low-
density lipoprotein (VLDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles were evaluated at
baseline, 12 and 72 weeks after randomization, and 24 weeks
following EOT.
Conclusion: OCA therapy is associated with increases in
small
VLDL particles, large and small LDL particles, and a
reduction
in HDL particles at 12 weeks. These lipoprotein
concentrations
reverted to baseline values 24 weeks after drug
obeticholic acid
(OCA), a farnesoid X receptor agonist, improved liver disease but
led to an increase in cholesterol
53. OCA increase the risk of gallstone
August 25, 2023
Obeticholic acid may increase the risk of gallstone
formation in susceptible patientsEnter title via "insert>header and footer>footer" |
53
OCA in Animal and human study has
shown pharmacological activation of the
farnesoid X receptor increased the risk of
gallstone formation.
Reason could be
FGF19 might trigger relaxation and filling of the
gallbladder which, in combination with increased
cholesterol saturation and BA
hydrophobicity, both decreasing cholesterol
solubility in bile. This would enhance the risk of
gallstone development.
54. FDA LETTER ON OBETICOLIC ACID 29 JUNE 2020
•The predicted benefit of OCA based on a surrogate histopathologic
endpoint remains uncertain and does not sufficiently outweigh the
potential risks to support accelerated approval for the treatment of
patients with liver fibrosis due to NASH
•Additional post-interim analysis efficacy and safety data is needed from
the ongoing REGENERATE study .
•The long-term outcomes phase of the study should continue.
55. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lubiprostone for the treatment of non-
alcoholic fatty liver disease in adult patients with constipation: The
LUBIPRONE, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study
design.( ONGOING STUDY)
• LUB is a type 2 chloride channel activator used as a laxative for the treatment
of patients with constipation.
• LUB suppresses gut permeability induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs in healthy volunteers and lowers blood endotoxin levels.
• There have been no clinical studies of LUB for NAFLD/NASH patients.
56. Contd …
Method
The study plans to enrol adult patients (20-85 years, planned enrolment, n = 150;
planned sample size, n = 120) with NAFLD and constipation, alanine
aminotransferase ≥40 IU/L, equivalent steatosis grade ≥1, and equivalent fibrosis
stage <4 measured using non-invasive vibration-controlled transient elastography
and magnetic resonance imaging. Participants will be randomly allocated into
three groups: LUB 12 μg, LUB 24 μg, and a placebo group
Results : primary endpoint will be changes in alanine aminotransferase from
baseline at 12 weeks. The main secondary endpoint will be changes in intestinal
permeability from baseline at 12 weeks using the lactulose mannitol ratio.
Conclusions: This study will determine whether LUB improves gut permeability
in NAFLD patients with constipation
57. Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing
Procedure Improves NASH and
Diabetes Markers
5
7
• DMR catheter to reach the duodenum (a
tube is inserted down through the esophagus)
to lift the submucosal lining of the organ and
use heated liquid to strip away the excessive
growth of the mucosal layer.
• This promotes healthy regrowth of the lining
of the duodenum within 12 weeks with the goal
of reducing insulin resistance and excess insulin
in the blood.
August 25, 2023
58. Endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing improves
glycaemic and hepatic indices in type 2 diabetes: 6-
month multicentre results
• 85 patients with T2DM who received endoscopic DMR treatment were
enrolled from 5 centres and followed up for 6 months.
• Assessed safety in all patients. Efficacy was evaluated in patients who
received at least 9 cm of duodenal ablation (n = 67).
• Endpoints included HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, weight and
aminotransferase levels. Metabolomic analysis was conducted in a subgroup
(n = 14). Data were analysed using paired t test or ANOVA for repeated
measures with Bonferroni correction and correction for initial weight loss if
applicable.
August 25, 2023 58
59. Results and Conclusion
• The DMR procedure was completed with no intraprocedural complications in the entire cohort
• HbA1c was lower 6 months after DMR than at baseline (7.9 ± 0.2% vs. 9.0 ± 0.2% [mean ±
SE], p ≪0.001).
• Fasting plasma glucose was also significantly lower 6 months after DMR compared to baseline (161 ± 7
mg/dl vs. 189 ± 6 mg/dl, p = 0.005).
• Body weight decreased slightly.
• At 6 months, alanine aminotransferase had decreased from 41 ± 3 IU/L to 29 ± 2 IU/L (p ≪0.001) and
aspartate aminotransferase had decreased from 30 ± 2 IU/L to 23 ± 1 IU/L (p ≪0.001).
• Metabolomic analysis demonstrated that DMR had key lipid-lowering, insulin-sensitizing and anti-
inflammatory effects, as well as increasing antioxidant capacity. Mean FIB-4 was also markedly
decreased.
Conclusion : Hydrothermal ablation of the duodenum by DMR elicits a beneficial metabolic
response in patients with T2DM. DMR also improves hepatic indices, potentially through an
insulin-sensitizing mechanism. These encouraging data deserve further evaluation in
randomized controlled trials.
August 25, 2023
Endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing improves glycaemic and hepatic indices in type 2 diabetes: 6-
month multicentre results
59
62. The Liraglutide Efficacy and Action in Non-
alcoholic Steatohepatitis (LEAN)
Results of the LEAN trial
a P<.05; b P = .05, remaining comparisons P>.05.
LI, lobular inflammation
Gawrieh & Chalasani . Treatments for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Clin Liver Dis - (2017)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2017.08.013
65. ALP reduction induced by Elafibranor
•Elafibranor in NASH:
• Effects on ALP and GGT increase with the level at baseline
• Effects consistent in all Phase 2 trials in cardiometabolic patients
Vlad Ratziu e tal Gastroenterology 2016;150:1147–1159
69. Current and Potential Future Pharmacological Interventions
Savinda Liyanagedera 1 , Robert Patrick Williams 1 , Silvio Veraldi 2 3 , Valerio Nobili 2 3 , Jake P Mann 4 5
Affiliations PMID: 28803504 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1365599
70. Conclusion
All patients with high risk of NASH should be identified especially those with
metabolic risk factors.
There is long period of approx 15 years for an individual to progress from NASH
to cirrhosis so timely intervention and screening can arrest this progression.
Dietary and lifestyle modifications scores over pharmacotherapy .
Editor's Notes
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease or NAFLD is defined as accumulation of fat in the liver in the absence of recent or ongoing intake of significant amount of alcohol. The cut-off of alcohol intake is up to 20 g/day both for males and females (approximately 30 mL of whisky/100 mL of wine/240 mL of beer/10 g of alcohol). NAFLD is primary if other secondary causes of hepatic steatosis have been excluded. Secondary causes include hepatitis C virus infection, various inborn errors of metabolism, total parenteral nutrition, various medications, surgical procedures etc.
Reference
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
The fat deposition in the liver is best defined histologically on liver biopsy as the macrovesicular steatosis that occupies at least 5% of the hepatocytes. Simple steatosis or non-alcoholic fatty liver is characterised by presence of fat in the liver with or without the presence of lobular inflammation on histology. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or NASH is characterised by presence of one of the 3 features on liver histology such as ballooning of hepatocytes, Mallory hyaline bodies and fibrosis, in addition to steatosis and inflammation.
Reference
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
The overall prevalence of NAFLD is 25.24%. The prevalence is 24.13% in North America, 30.45% in South America, 13.48% in Africa, 31.79% in Middle East, 23.71% in Europe and 27.37% in Asia.
Reference
Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73-84.
NAFLD affects around a quarter of the Asian adult population and prevalence of NAFLD has been increasing in the past two decades.[1] Obesity epidemic, metabolic syndrome epidemic, urbanisation, sedentary lifestyle and Western diet have contributed to NAFLD epidemic in Asia.[1,2] The table on-screen shows the prevalence of NAFLD across Asian countries.[1] The data of prevalence of NASH that is pooled for Asian countries in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD is 63.5%.[3]
References
Fan JG, Kim SU, Wong VW. New trends on obesity and NAFLD in Asia. J Hepatol. 2017;67(4):862-873.
Pati GK, Singh SP. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in South Asia. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2016;6(2):154-162.
Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73-84.
NAFLD is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome. It may also be associated with certain medications such as NSAIDs, tamoxifen etc. and nutritional and hormonal disturbances.
Reference
Patel V, Sanyal AJ, Sterling R. Clinical presentation and patient evaluation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2016;20(2):277-292.
Upto 75% patients with NASH have diabetes mellitus. Obese, middle-aged females with DM are more likely to have fatty liver changes on ultrasonography (upto 70%). In one study, a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus
was associated with a 2.6-fold increase in the risk of NASH.
The diagnosis of exclusion, a detailed history and physical examination is essential for NAFLD. NAFLD is usually asymptomatic and is often detected following an incidental finding of liver enzyme abnormalities or steatosis on imaging.[1] Intake of significant amount of alcohol as well as secondary causes of liver disease should be excluded, including viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver disease, drug-induced liver injury, coeliac disease, Wilson disease and haemochromatosis.[1,2] Anthropometry may reveal
overweight, obesity or central obesity. Mild hepatomegaly may be present in around 50% of these patients. There will be signs of liver failure in patients with disease progression to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma.
References
Dyson JK, Anstee QM, McPherson S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a practical approach to diagnosis and staging. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
In NAFLD patients, alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase levels (AST) are usually mildly elevated. Gamma-glutamyl transferase levels may or may not be elevated.[1] However, majority of patients (79%) often have normal ALT levels.[2] ALT levels are poor predictors of NAFLD. Patients with significant liver disease can be overlooked if clinicians depend on abnormalities in liver enzyme to identify NAFLD.[1] Testing of fasting and postprandial blood glucose, insulin resistance using homoeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) or 2-hour glucose tolerance test, serum triglycerides and HDL needs to be performed to look for components of metabolic syndrome. Patients should be screened for hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection. Further work-up for autoimmune hepatitis, coeliac disease, haemochromatosis and Wilson disease can be done depending on the age of the patient.[3] Autoantibodies are also frequently detected at a low titre in subjects with NAFLD. Immunoglobulin G levels are usually normal and not indicative of autoimmune hepatitis. NAFLD may be associated with raised ferritin levels and usually reflect underlying inflammatory activity or insulin resistance.[1]
References
Dyson JK, Anstee QM, McPherson S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a practical approach to diagnosis and staging. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40(6):1387-1395.
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Abdominal ultrasound is the first-line investigation for patients with suspected hepatic steatosis. It can provide qualitative assessment of fatty infiltration of liver.[1] The presence of >33% fat on liver biopsy is considered optimal for detection of steatosis by ultrasound imaging.[2] The characteristic sonographic features of NAFLD are shown on-screen.[3]
References
Dyson JK, Anstee QM, McPherson S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a practical approach to diagnosis and staging. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
Saadeh S, Younossi ZM, Remer EM, et al. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(3):745-750.
Khov N, Sharma A, Riley TR. Bedside ultrasound in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(22):6821-6825.
Imaging modalities such as computed tomography scan can detect steatosis, but not routinely used.[1] Magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy can be used to quantify fat content and it exhibits good accuracy for grading severity of steatosis.[2,3] However, none of the imaging modalities can differentiate between steatosis and NASH.[4]
References
Dyson JK, Anstee QM, McPherson S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a practical approach to diagnosis and staging. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
Schwenzer NF, Springer F, Schraml C, Stefan N, Machann J, Schick F. Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. J Hepatol. 2009;51(3):433-445.
McPherson S, Jonsson JR, Cowin GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy accurately estimate the severity of steatosis provided the stage of fibrosis is considered. J Hepatol. 2009;51(2):389-397.
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Serum biomarkers for differentiating steatosis and NASH are still under evaluation. Potential biomarkers are cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) and terminal peptide of procollagen III (PIIINP).[1] Serum biomarkers can be an acceptable alternative for diagnosis of steatosis when imaging modalities are not available.[2]
References
Dyson JK, Anstee QM, McPherson S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a practical approach to diagnosis and staging. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-402.
Staging of hepatic fibrosis is necessary in all patients with NAFLD.[1] Transient elastography is the only imaging modality that can detect liver fibrosis.[2] It provides measurement of liver stiffness which correlates well with degree of fibrosis.[2,3] NAFLD fibrosis score, BARD score and FIB-4 scores can be used to exclude advanced fibrosis in patients and can identify patients with mild disease.[1]
References
Dyson JK, Anstee QM, McPherson S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a practical approach to diagnosis and staging. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Rockey DC. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension with transient elastography. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(1):8-14.
Liver biopsy is the only useful modality for assessing disease severity in patients with NAFLD. The indications for liver biopsy in patients with NAFLD are shown on-screen.[1] NASH is histologically defined as combination of 3 lesions (steatosis, ballooning and lobular inflammation) within a characteristic topographical distribution, mainly centrilobular, zone 3 of the acini.[2,3] The image on-screen shows the haematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue specimen in NASH.[4]
References
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, Day C, Marchesini G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J Hepatol. 2010;53(2):372-84.
EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.
Spengler EK, Loomba R. Recommendations for diagnosis, referral for liver biopsy, and treatment of NAFLD and NASH. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2015;90(9):1233-1246.
The NAFLD activity score or NAS is a widely used grading system for NAFLD. A score of ≥5 with steatosis and hepatocyte ballooning is a diagnostic of NASH, but patients can still have NASH with lower NAS scores if steatosis and hepatocyte ballooning are present.
Reference
Dyson JK, Anstee QM, McPherson S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a practical approach to diagnosis and staging. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014;5(3):211-218.
Lifestyle modifications form the cornerstone of management of NAFLD. The exercise regimen should consist of brisk walking, jogging or rhythmic aerobic exercises for a minimum of 45 minutes, 5 days per week, to achieve a target heart rate of 60% to 70% of the maximal heart rate. In overweight and obese patients, initial weight reduction should be 10% of the body weight in 6 to 8 months.[1] Successful outcome depends on a behavioural change in the patient who needs to follow it on a long-term basis.[2]
References
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Farrell GC, Wong VW, Chitturi S. NAFLD in Asia--as common and important as in the West. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(5):307-318.
Pharmacotherapy is indicated based on severity of fibrosis, potential for disease progression and potency of drugs to retard the progression of liver damage.[1] The indications of pharmacotherapy in patients with NASH are shown on-screen.[2] Pharmacotherapy is not recommended for bland steatosis and NASH with no or minimal fibrosis (stage 0 or 1).[1] None of the agents for treatment of NASH can modify the course of disease.[3] The drugs with established efficacy are vitamin E and pioglitazone. These are recommended for nondiabetic patients with histological NASH.[3] The drugs with equivocal efficacy are also shown on-screen.[4]
References
Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, Day C, Marchesini G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J Hepatol. 2010;53(2):372-384.
EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Gawrieh S, Chalasani N. Pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(3):338-348.
Pharmacotherapy is indicated based on severity of fibrosis, potential for disease progression and potency of drugs to retard the progression of liver damage.[1] The indications of pharmacotherapy in patients with NASH are shown on-screen.[2] Pharmacotherapy is not recommended for bland steatosis and NASH with no or minimal fibrosis (stage 0 or 1).[1] None of the agents for treatment of NASH can modify the course of disease.[3] The drugs with established efficacy are vitamin E and pioglitazone. These are recommended for nondiabetic patients with histological NASH.[3] The drugs with equivocal efficacy are also shown on-screen.[4]
References
Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, Day C, Marchesini G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J Hepatol. 2010;53(2):372-384.
EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388-1402.
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Gawrieh S, Chalasani N. Pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(3):338-348.
Sanyal et al evaluated the effects of vitamin E, pioglitazone therapy on histological parameters in 247 patients with NASH and without diabetes. The patients were randomly assigned to pioglitazone 30 mg daily, vitamin E 800 IU daily or placebo for 96 weeks. Vitamin E therapy, compared with placebo, was associated with a significantly higher rate of improvement in NASH (43% vs. 19%, P = .001), but the comparison of pioglitazone therapy with placebo did not reach the pre-specified .025 level of significance for the primary outcome (34% vs. 19%, P = .04). Compared with the placebo group, both active treatment groups had a significant reduction in steatosis, lobular inflammation and NAFLD activity score. Vitamin E was associated with significant improvement in hepatocellular ballooning scores but improvement with pioglitazone was not significant. Fibrosis scores were not significant with either active treatment groups.[1,2] However, a meta-analysis of 4 good-quality RCTs conducted by Boettcher et al showed that pioglitazone might reverse fibrosis in NASH.[3]
References
Sanyal AJ, Chalasani N, Kowdley KV, et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1675-1685.
Gawrieh S, Chalasani N. Pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(3):338-348.
Boettcher E, Csako G, Pucino F, Wesley R, Loomba R. Meta-analysis: pioglitazone improves liver histology and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(1):66-75.
The results from 2 meta-analysis on effects of vitamin E supplementation showed that vitamin E at dose >400 IU/day might increase all-cause mortality and increase risk of haemorrhagic stroke.[1,2] Klein et al conducted an RCT and observed an increase in risk of prostate cancer in healthy males with vitamin E supplementation.[3] Pioglitazone is associated with weight gain but evidence on its long-term efficacy and safety is lacking.[4,5]
References
Miller ER 3rd, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, Guallar E. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):37-46.
Schürks M, Glynn RJ, Rist PM, Tzourio C, Kurth T. Effects of vitamin E on stroke subtypes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010;341:c5702.
Klein EA, Thompson IM, Tangen CM, et al. Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer: updated results of the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA. 2011;306(14):1549-1556.
Sanyal AJ, Chalasani N, Kowdley KV, et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(18):1675-1685.
Gitto S, Vitale G, Villa E, Andreone P. Treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in adults: present and future. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:732870.
Ursodeoxycholic acid protects against hepatocyte injury by decreasing bile acids and reduces oxidative stress in patients with NAFLD.[1] Duseja A et al conducted a prospective study in 100 patients with NAFLD managed with ursodeoxycholic acid (300 mg twice a day) and lifestyle modifications. A total of 74% of patients with NAFLD achieved biochemical response with this management.[2] In a randomised placebo-controlled trial, Leuschner et al observed significant improvement in lobular inflammation with use of high dose of ursodeoxycholic acid (23-28 mg/kg/day) in patients with NASH for 18 months.[3] Treatment with high dose of ursodeoxycholic acid (28-35 mg/kg/day) in patients with NASH for 12 months reduced mean ALT levels from baseline and serum fibrosis markers (P<.001) and improved markers of glycaemic control and insulin resistance.[4]
References
Duseja A, Singh SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome—position paper of the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver, Endocrine Society of India, Indian College of Cardiology and Indian Society of Gastroenterology. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5(1):51-68.
Duseja A, Das A, Das R, et al. The clinicopathological profile of Indian patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is different from that in the West. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(9):2368-2374.
Leuschner UF, Lindenthal B, Herrmann G, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid therapy for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology. 2010;52(2):472-479.
Ratziu V, de Ledinghen V, Oberti F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of high-dose ursodesoxycholic acid for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2011;54(5):1011-1019.
A systematic review carried out by Xiang et al, tested the effects of UDCA in patients with NASH. Of the twelve randomised clinical trials that were selected, 7 assessed UDCA monotherapy, while others tested combinations of UDCA with vitamin E, polyene phosphatidylcholine, silymarin, glycyrrhizin, and tiopronin. Two of the studies used high doses of UDCA (23-35 mg/kg/day). The duration of therapy ranged from 3 to 24 months.
Observations were as detailed:
Monotherapy with UDCA caused a significant improvement in liver function in 5 studies and even improved steatosis and fibrosis in 2 of them.
Combination therapies with UDCA led to significant improvements in liver function while there was improvement in steatosis and inflammation in 2 of them.
High-dose UDCA therapy resulted in significant improvements in ALT, ¥GT, and liver fibrosis.
UDCA monotherapy and in combination with vitamin E showed significant improvement in ALT while the latter also led to alleviation of steatosis.
UDCA was seen to alleviate metabolic markers in NASH patients.
High-dose UDCA resulted in significant reductions in serum glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, and insulin concentrations and triglycerides. (Xiang_2013)
Haukeland et al conducted a randomised placebo controlled trial in 48 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD to evaluate the effects of metformin 500 mg/day (up to maximum 2500 or 3000 mg) in these patients. There were no significant differences between metformin-treated and placebo groups in terms of change in steatosis assessed histologically (A), computed tomography density measurements or changes in serum levels of AST and ALT. There was a significant reduction in body weight in metformin-treated patients (D) compared with placebo.
Reference
Haukeland JW, Konopski Z, Eggesbø HB, et al. Metformin in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized, controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(7):853-860.
The effects of various interventions on weight, insulin resistance, liver enzymes, inflammation, fibrosis, long-term morbidity and mortality are shown on-screen.
Reference
Gitto S, Vitale G, Villa E, Andreone P. Treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in adults: present and future. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:732870.