MASLD (Fatty Liver)
Recent Advances in
Management
Dr GOPI SRIKANTH
Dr GOPI SRIKANTH
MD (PGIMER, Chandigarh)
DM & Fellowship (AIIMS, New Delhi)
EUS Fellowship (WISE, WEO)
Ex Faculty AIIMS, New Delhi
Current designation:
Consultant in Gastroenterology,
Hepatology and Advanced Endoscopy
Yashoda Hospitals (Hitec-city),
Hyderabad
Real life case scenario
• 55 year old male
• Non-smoker, No history of alcohol consumption
• Editor by profession
• Presented to us with painless hematemesis – 4 episodes from last 4
hours
Emergency UGIE – Active bleed from the esophageal varices
Endoscopic variceal band ligation done
Hemostasis achieved
• Triphasic CT abdomen – Features of cirrhosis with no ascites or liver SOL
• HBsAg and Anti-HCV - negative
• Percutaneous liver biopsy – features of cirrhosis with steatohepatitis
Final diagnosis: Esophageal variceal bleed
Portal hypertension
Cirrhosis
Etiology: MASLD (fatty liver)
What is fatty liver
• ≥5% of hepatocytes display macrovesicular steatosis (fatty infiltration)
• In the absence of a readily identified alternative cause of steatosis
Nomenclature:
- Fatty liver
- NAFLD (Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease)
- MAFLD (Metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease)
- MASLD (Metabolic dysfunction steatotic liver disease) – accepted terminology
Obesity in India
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2018, Nov, Vol-12(11): LC01-LC05
MASLD Epidemiology - India
• 50 studies
• Pooled prevalence:
Adults: 38.6% (32-45.5)
Children: 35.4% (18.2-54.7)
• Males = Females
• Urban : 40% / Rural: 29.2%
8
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 May-Jun; 12(3): 818–829
MASLD –
Pathogenesis
Alcohol consumption – Liver disease
Consensus Nomenclature
11
The NAFLD nomenclature is changing.
12
CARDIOMETABOLIC RISKS
Fatty liver Spectrum
Journal of Hepatology 2019 vol. 70 j 151–171
Low risk
NASH
At risk NASH
(≥ F2 fibrosis)
Liver – Regenerative capacity
Persistent injury - Point of no return
Liver function test – Blood
Normal ALT :
Males - 29 to 33 IU/l
Females - 19 to 25 IU/l
Levels above this should be assessed
Asymptomatic elevated ALT/AST
• 18% - elevated aminotransferase ( ALT > 31 or AST > 24)
• Multivariate analysis association - age, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia and
higher BMI
Annasamy C et al, Biomed Pharmacol J 2017
To remember
• Don’t rely on lab upper limits for LFT interpretation
ALT >33 (Male)
ALT > 25 (Female)
Red-flag
Assess cause
Non-invasive tests for NAFLD evaluation
Transient
Elastography
NITs in patients observed in primary care
EASL clinical practice guidelines on NIT, 2021
Hepatology 2019;0:1-10
Risk stratification– Whom to screen
J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
Additional causes of hepatic
steatosis:
1. Alcohol
2. Chronic Hepatitis C
3. Drugs
4. Malnutrition
5. Long term TPN
6. Hypobetalipoproteinemia
7. Wilson
8. Celiac ds
9. lysosomal acid lipase
deficiency
Risk stratification - Whom to refer
J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
To identify “At risk NASH”
FIB-4 caveats
• Age >65 - cutoff >2.0
• Age < 35 - low accuracy
Age <35 + metabolic risks or elevated liver enzymes – TE
• not be used in acutely ill
Risk stratification
J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
Identify “At risk NASH” by
Transient Elastography
MASLD – Indications for liver biopsy
• To assess stage of fibrosis if :
1. Discordant or indeterminate NITs
2. Discordance between NITs and clinical / imaging / lab features
• To confirm diagnosis if:
1. Competing or concomitant possible diagnoses (eg, autoimmune
hepatitis, DILI)
2. Persistent elevation (>6 mo) in liver chemistries
Treatment of MASLD
Systemic disorder
Needs Multimodality treatment
Treatment of all individual aspects
Management
• Lifestyle Interventions
• Pharmacotherapy
• Bariatric procedures
• Management of metabolic risk factors / modifiers
Weight loss – Key component
Lifestyle Interventions and
MASH Resolution/ Fibrosis improvement
Romero-Gomez M et al. J Hepatol 2017
• Paired liver biopsies - 261 patients (Out of 293) - lifestyle interventions in clinical
practice for 52 weeks – Single arm non-interventional study
• Overall-
• 72 (25%) - resolution of NASH
• 138 (47%) - reduction in NAS
• 56 (19%) - regression of fibrosis.
• Weight loss at week 52
• 88 (30%) – at least 5% of their weight
• 29 (10%) - ≥ 10%
• Degree of weight loss - independently associated with improvements in all NASH-
related histologic parameters (odds ratios = 1.1- 2.0; P < .01).
Diet
• Calorie restriction appears to be more important than the specific type of diet
• Daily calorie restriction by 30% or 500-1000 Kcal/day to achieve the target weight loss
• Total fat should not exceed 30% of total energy intake. Intake of saturated fats should be
<10% of total energy intake
• Limit intake of free sugars
• >2 cups of caffeinated coffee per day in NAFLD (Indian habit of sweetening their coffee -
? Counterproductive)
J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
• 23 studies - 24 aerobic and 7 resistance exercise protocols .
• Twelve articles including 13 aerobic and 4 resistance exercise protocols
were selected for the comparative analysis.
• Both aerobic and resistance exercise reduce hepatic steatosis with
similar frequency, duration, and period of exercise (40–45 min/session 3
times/week for 12 weeks)
• Intensity and energy consumption - significantly lower for resistance
than for aerobic exercise.
• Resistance exercise - more feasible than aerobic exercise for patients
with poor cardiorespiratory fitness or for those who cannot tolerate or
participate in aerobic exercise.
Hashida R et al. J Hepatol 2017
Exercise
• Moderate intensity aerobic or resistance exercises 30-45
minutes/day at least 5 days in a week (at least 200 minutes per
week) in all patients with NAFLD irrespective of body weight
• Moderate intensity aerobic exercises include brisk walking, jogging,
running, swimming, cycling etc
J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
Issues with lifestyle interventions
Vilar-Gomez E et al. Gastroenterology 2015
Who require pharmacotherapy for NASH ?
J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
Vitamin E and Pioglitazone – Improvement in NAS
Sanyal AJ. et al. N Eng J Med 2010
Vitamin E and Pioglitazone – Improvement in Fibrosis
Sanyal AJ. et al. N Eng J Med 2010
Fatty acid catabolism
Insulin secretion
Wound healing / Cancer
Inflammation
Placenta development
PPAR PPAR 
PPAR
Fatty acid catabolism
(circadian regulation)
Inflammation
Detoxification
Sexual dimorphism
Adipogenesis
Fatty acid storage
Glucose metabolism
Inflammation
Placenta development
Fibrates
Thiazolidinediones
Pioglitazone
Dual PPAR Agonists
Saroglitazar
Elafibranor
IVA337-Lanifibranor/ Bezafibrate
Grygiel-Górniak B. Nutritional Journal 2014
Gawrieh S et al. Hepatology 2021
• 102 adult patients – at 10 centres in India.
• Biopsy proven NASH (F1-3)
• NAFLD activity score (NAS) of ≥4
• Score of at least 1 in each
• steatosis, lobular inflammation
hepatocyte ballooning
• Randomized - 2:1
• Saroglitazar 4mg and placebo
• At week 52 - Proportion of patients
• Decrease in NAS ≥2
• Spread across 2 of NAS components
• Without worsening of fibrosis
Saroglitazar- Phase III (EVIDENCES II)
Sarin SK, Sharma , Koradia P, Duseja A et al, APASL 2020
Safety and Tolerability of Recommended Therapies
(Off Label)
Vitamin E (800 IU/day)
• Possible all-cause mortality risk at
> 800 IU/day
• Increased hemorrhagic stroke risk
• Also shows reduced ischemic stroke risk
• Increased prostate carcinoma risk
(HR vs placebo: 1.17; 99% CI: 1.004-1.36;
P = .008)
Pioglitazone
• Edema, weight gain (~ 2-3 kg over
2-4 yrs)
• Risk of osteoporosis in women[5]
• Equivocal bladder cancer risk
• Increased in some studies
• No association in most studies
Use of these agents should be personalized for selected patients
with histologically confirmed NASH after careful consideration of risk/benefit ratio
N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1547-1558
Incretins
45
James Armstrong et al. LANCET 2016
- subcutaneous injections of 1.8mg liraglutide OD
- 48-week treatment
- 26 in each group
- Primary end-point (NASH resolution) - 39% vs 9% (p=0.019)
- Progression of fibrosis - 9% vs 36% (p=0.03)
N Engl J Med 2021; 384:1113-1124
Obeticholic Acid: FXR Agonist
• FXR central to multiple key pathways in animal models
Hepatology. 2014;59:2286.
↑ Cholesterol
↓ Bile acids
CYP7a1
↓ Fibrosis
↓ Hepatic
triglycerides
↑ Glucose tolerance
Multiple mechanisms
via ↓ SREPB-1C
RXR
via ↑ β-oxidation
↓ Stellate cell
activation
via ↑ iNOS
↓ Portal
pressure
FXR agonist
(eg, obeticholic acid)
Younossi Z et al. Lancet 2019
Failed to show direct benefit in NASH (RCTs)
• Statins
• Metformin
• Elafibranor
Surgical Interventions for weight loss
• Lifestyle interventions
• Not all patients are obese
• Less than one third - ≥ 5% weight loss
• Less than 10% - ≥ 10% weight loss
• Pharmacological approach
• Increase weight loss by 3-9%, Unfavorable side effects
• Weight recidivism with both – difficult to sustain
• Bariatric Surgery
• Effective, No RCTs, not recommended in NASH
• Less than 1% - who qualify undergo surgery
• Cost, preference, access, morbidity, mortality
• Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapy (EBMT) – Less invasive
• Limited data
• No RCTs, not recommended in NASH
J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
- Total bodyweight loss - 13·6% ESG group and 0·8% for
control group (p<0·0001)
- At 52 weeks, 80% of 51 participants in the ESG group had an
improvement in one or more metabolic comorbidities,
compared with the control group in which 45% of 62
participants had similar improvement
- At 104 weeks, 68% of 60 participants in the ESG group
maintained 25% or more of EWL.
- ESG-related serious adverse events: 2% (no mortality or
need for intensive care or surgery)
Modifiers of NAFLD
Gastroenterology 2020;158:1851–1864
MASLD Lifestyle changes
Aggressive risk factor modification (like HTN,
Dyslipidemia)
Assess
cardiometabolic
risk factor
Assess for
“At risk MASLD”
Low risk At risk Cirrhotic
Obesity
Present Absent
Is he eligible for
bariatric procedure
Yes No DM Yes
No
Consider Vit. E/ Saroglitazar /
?Pioglitazone
Prefer Pioglitazone /
?Semaglutide
Bariatric option
Precancerous conditions of liver cancer (HCC)
• Cirrhosis
• Non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B
• Non-cirrhotic fatty liver with advanced fibrosis
Surveillance with USG liver+ serum AFP
every 6 months
in all cirrhosis cases
- Can detect HCC early
To remember
"Be Vigilant, Do Regular Liver Check-Up,
Fatty Liver Can Affect Anyone”
- World Liver Day 2023 theme
Let’s Live Strong with Live(r) Strong
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology,
and Advanced Interventional Endoscopy
Yashoda Hospitals, Hi-tec city, Hyderabad

Fatty liver KKD.pptx

  • 1.
    MASLD (Fatty Liver) RecentAdvances in Management Dr GOPI SRIKANTH
  • 2.
    Dr GOPI SRIKANTH MD(PGIMER, Chandigarh) DM & Fellowship (AIIMS, New Delhi) EUS Fellowship (WISE, WEO) Ex Faculty AIIMS, New Delhi Current designation: Consultant in Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Advanced Endoscopy Yashoda Hospitals (Hitec-city), Hyderabad
  • 3.
    Real life casescenario • 55 year old male • Non-smoker, No history of alcohol consumption • Editor by profession • Presented to us with painless hematemesis – 4 episodes from last 4 hours
  • 4.
    Emergency UGIE –Active bleed from the esophageal varices Endoscopic variceal band ligation done Hemostasis achieved
  • 5.
    • Triphasic CTabdomen – Features of cirrhosis with no ascites or liver SOL • HBsAg and Anti-HCV - negative • Percutaneous liver biopsy – features of cirrhosis with steatohepatitis Final diagnosis: Esophageal variceal bleed Portal hypertension Cirrhosis Etiology: MASLD (fatty liver)
  • 6.
    What is fattyliver • ≥5% of hepatocytes display macrovesicular steatosis (fatty infiltration) • In the absence of a readily identified alternative cause of steatosis Nomenclature: - Fatty liver - NAFLD (Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) - MAFLD (Metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease) - MASLD (Metabolic dysfunction steatotic liver disease) – accepted terminology
  • 7.
    Obesity in India Journalof Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2018, Nov, Vol-12(11): LC01-LC05
  • 8.
    MASLD Epidemiology -India • 50 studies • Pooled prevalence: Adults: 38.6% (32-45.5) Children: 35.4% (18.2-54.7) • Males = Females • Urban : 40% / Rural: 29.2% 8 J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 May-Jun; 12(3): 818–829
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Consensus Nomenclature 11 The NAFLDnomenclature is changing.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Fatty liver Spectrum Journalof Hepatology 2019 vol. 70 j 151–171 Low risk NASH At risk NASH (≥ F2 fibrosis)
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Persistent injury -Point of no return
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Normal ALT : Males- 29 to 33 IU/l Females - 19 to 25 IU/l Levels above this should be assessed
  • 18.
    Asymptomatic elevated ALT/AST •18% - elevated aminotransferase ( ALT > 31 or AST > 24) • Multivariate analysis association - age, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia and higher BMI Annasamy C et al, Biomed Pharmacol J 2017
  • 19.
    To remember • Don’trely on lab upper limits for LFT interpretation ALT >33 (Male) ALT > 25 (Female) Red-flag Assess cause
  • 20.
    Non-invasive tests forNAFLD evaluation
  • 21.
  • 22.
    NITs in patientsobserved in primary care EASL clinical practice guidelines on NIT, 2021 Hepatology 2019;0:1-10
  • 23.
    Risk stratification– Whomto screen J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302 Additional causes of hepatic steatosis: 1. Alcohol 2. Chronic Hepatitis C 3. Drugs 4. Malnutrition 5. Long term TPN 6. Hypobetalipoproteinemia 7. Wilson 8. Celiac ds 9. lysosomal acid lipase deficiency
  • 24.
    Risk stratification -Whom to refer J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302 To identify “At risk NASH”
  • 25.
    FIB-4 caveats • Age>65 - cutoff >2.0 • Age < 35 - low accuracy Age <35 + metabolic risks or elevated liver enzymes – TE • not be used in acutely ill
  • 26.
    Risk stratification J CLINEXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302 Identify “At risk NASH” by Transient Elastography
  • 27.
    MASLD – Indicationsfor liver biopsy • To assess stage of fibrosis if : 1. Discordant or indeterminate NITs 2. Discordance between NITs and clinical / imaging / lab features • To confirm diagnosis if: 1. Competing or concomitant possible diagnoses (eg, autoimmune hepatitis, DILI) 2. Persistent elevation (>6 mo) in liver chemistries
  • 28.
    Treatment of MASLD Systemicdisorder Needs Multimodality treatment Treatment of all individual aspects
  • 29.
    Management • Lifestyle Interventions •Pharmacotherapy • Bariatric procedures • Management of metabolic risk factors / modifiers
  • 30.
    Weight loss –Key component
  • 31.
    Lifestyle Interventions and MASHResolution/ Fibrosis improvement Romero-Gomez M et al. J Hepatol 2017
  • 32.
    • Paired liverbiopsies - 261 patients (Out of 293) - lifestyle interventions in clinical practice for 52 weeks – Single arm non-interventional study • Overall- • 72 (25%) - resolution of NASH • 138 (47%) - reduction in NAS • 56 (19%) - regression of fibrosis. • Weight loss at week 52 • 88 (30%) – at least 5% of their weight • 29 (10%) - ≥ 10% • Degree of weight loss - independently associated with improvements in all NASH- related histologic parameters (odds ratios = 1.1- 2.0; P < .01).
  • 33.
    Diet • Calorie restrictionappears to be more important than the specific type of diet • Daily calorie restriction by 30% or 500-1000 Kcal/day to achieve the target weight loss • Total fat should not exceed 30% of total energy intake. Intake of saturated fats should be <10% of total energy intake • Limit intake of free sugars • >2 cups of caffeinated coffee per day in NAFLD (Indian habit of sweetening their coffee - ? Counterproductive) J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
  • 34.
    • 23 studies- 24 aerobic and 7 resistance exercise protocols . • Twelve articles including 13 aerobic and 4 resistance exercise protocols were selected for the comparative analysis. • Both aerobic and resistance exercise reduce hepatic steatosis with similar frequency, duration, and period of exercise (40–45 min/session 3 times/week for 12 weeks) • Intensity and energy consumption - significantly lower for resistance than for aerobic exercise. • Resistance exercise - more feasible than aerobic exercise for patients with poor cardiorespiratory fitness or for those who cannot tolerate or participate in aerobic exercise. Hashida R et al. J Hepatol 2017
  • 35.
    Exercise • Moderate intensityaerobic or resistance exercises 30-45 minutes/day at least 5 days in a week (at least 200 minutes per week) in all patients with NAFLD irrespective of body weight • Moderate intensity aerobic exercises include brisk walking, jogging, running, swimming, cycling etc J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
  • 36.
    Issues with lifestyleinterventions Vilar-Gomez E et al. Gastroenterology 2015
  • 37.
    Who require pharmacotherapyfor NASH ? J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
  • 38.
    Vitamin E andPioglitazone – Improvement in NAS Sanyal AJ. et al. N Eng J Med 2010
  • 39.
    Vitamin E andPioglitazone – Improvement in Fibrosis Sanyal AJ. et al. N Eng J Med 2010
  • 40.
    Fatty acid catabolism Insulinsecretion Wound healing / Cancer Inflammation Placenta development PPAR PPAR  PPAR Fatty acid catabolism (circadian regulation) Inflammation Detoxification Sexual dimorphism Adipogenesis Fatty acid storage Glucose metabolism Inflammation Placenta development Fibrates Thiazolidinediones Pioglitazone Dual PPAR Agonists Saroglitazar Elafibranor IVA337-Lanifibranor/ Bezafibrate Grygiel-Górniak B. Nutritional Journal 2014
  • 41.
    Gawrieh S etal. Hepatology 2021
  • 42.
    • 102 adultpatients – at 10 centres in India. • Biopsy proven NASH (F1-3) • NAFLD activity score (NAS) of ≥4 • Score of at least 1 in each • steatosis, lobular inflammation hepatocyte ballooning • Randomized - 2:1 • Saroglitazar 4mg and placebo • At week 52 - Proportion of patients • Decrease in NAS ≥2 • Spread across 2 of NAS components • Without worsening of fibrosis Saroglitazar- Phase III (EVIDENCES II) Sarin SK, Sharma , Koradia P, Duseja A et al, APASL 2020
  • 43.
    Safety and Tolerabilityof Recommended Therapies (Off Label) Vitamin E (800 IU/day) • Possible all-cause mortality risk at > 800 IU/day • Increased hemorrhagic stroke risk • Also shows reduced ischemic stroke risk • Increased prostate carcinoma risk (HR vs placebo: 1.17; 99% CI: 1.004-1.36; P = .008) Pioglitazone • Edema, weight gain (~ 2-3 kg over 2-4 yrs) • Risk of osteoporosis in women[5] • Equivocal bladder cancer risk • Increased in some studies • No association in most studies Use of these agents should be personalized for selected patients with histologically confirmed NASH after careful consideration of risk/benefit ratio
  • 44.
    N Engl JMed 2021; 385:1547-1558
  • 45.
  • 46.
    - subcutaneous injectionsof 1.8mg liraglutide OD - 48-week treatment - 26 in each group - Primary end-point (NASH resolution) - 39% vs 9% (p=0.019) - Progression of fibrosis - 9% vs 36% (p=0.03)
  • 47.
    N Engl JMed 2021; 384:1113-1124
  • 48.
    Obeticholic Acid: FXRAgonist • FXR central to multiple key pathways in animal models Hepatology. 2014;59:2286. ↑ Cholesterol ↓ Bile acids CYP7a1 ↓ Fibrosis ↓ Hepatic triglycerides ↑ Glucose tolerance Multiple mechanisms via ↓ SREPB-1C RXR via ↑ β-oxidation ↓ Stellate cell activation via ↑ iNOS ↓ Portal pressure FXR agonist (eg, obeticholic acid)
  • 49.
    Younossi Z etal. Lancet 2019
  • 50.
    Failed to showdirect benefit in NASH (RCTs) • Statins • Metformin • Elafibranor
  • 51.
    Surgical Interventions forweight loss • Lifestyle interventions • Not all patients are obese • Less than one third - ≥ 5% weight loss • Less than 10% - ≥ 10% weight loss • Pharmacological approach • Increase weight loss by 3-9%, Unfavorable side effects • Weight recidivism with both – difficult to sustain • Bariatric Surgery • Effective, No RCTs, not recommended in NASH • Less than 1% - who qualify undergo surgery • Cost, preference, access, morbidity, mortality • Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapy (EBMT) – Less invasive • Limited data • No RCTs, not recommended in NASH J CLIN EXP HEPATOL 2023;13:273–302
  • 52.
    - Total bodyweightloss - 13·6% ESG group and 0·8% for control group (p<0·0001) - At 52 weeks, 80% of 51 participants in the ESG group had an improvement in one or more metabolic comorbidities, compared with the control group in which 45% of 62 participants had similar improvement - At 104 weeks, 68% of 60 participants in the ESG group maintained 25% or more of EWL. - ESG-related serious adverse events: 2% (no mortality or need for intensive care or surgery)
  • 53.
  • 54.
    MASLD Lifestyle changes Aggressiverisk factor modification (like HTN, Dyslipidemia) Assess cardiometabolic risk factor Assess for “At risk MASLD” Low risk At risk Cirrhotic Obesity Present Absent Is he eligible for bariatric procedure Yes No DM Yes No Consider Vit. E/ Saroglitazar / ?Pioglitazone Prefer Pioglitazone / ?Semaglutide Bariatric option
  • 55.
    Precancerous conditions ofliver cancer (HCC) • Cirrhosis • Non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B • Non-cirrhotic fatty liver with advanced fibrosis
  • 56.
    Surveillance with USGliver+ serum AFP every 6 months in all cirrhosis cases - Can detect HCC early To remember
  • 57.
    "Be Vigilant, DoRegular Liver Check-Up, Fatty Liver Can Affect Anyone” - World Liver Day 2023 theme
  • 58.
    Let’s Live Strongwith Live(r) Strong Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Advanced Interventional Endoscopy Yashoda Hospitals, Hi-tec city, Hyderabad

Editor's Notes

  • #8 National Family Health Survey
  • #12 Arun
  • #14 NAFLD fibrosis progression rate of one stage per 7 years in those with NASH versus 14 years for those with NAFL Themost common causes of death in patients with NAFLD overall are cardiovascular disease (CVD) and nonhepatic malignancy, followed by liver disease. (same across all spectrums) Patients with NASH and F2–4 fibrosis are at higher risk for liver-related events and mortality and are considered to have “at-risk” NASH - death from liver disease predominates in patients with advanced fibrosis.
  • #15 Prometheus was punished by Zeus because he stole fire to give back to mankind. He was chained to a rock in the Caucasus Mountains, and every day an eagle came and ate part of his liver. Each night, his liver would regrow, which meant he had to endure his punishment for eternity
  • #19 Among the 10765 participants, 18.0% (1938) had elevated aminotransferase ( ALT > 31 or AST > 24)
  • #23 STELLAR , AUC 0.75 to 0.8 for fib-4, TE, NFS, TE Fib-4 TE – sp 90, sen 80 (STELLAR study) systematic review and individual participant meta-analysis of biopsy-proven NAFLD patients, an expert panel review by the American College of Gastroenterology has recently endorsed cutoffs of <6.0 kPa and $8.2 kPa on VCTE for ruling-out and ruling-in significant fibrosis, respectiv
  • #25 FIB-4 cut-off <1 – better in Indian setting
  • #33 Low calorie low fat diet + exercise
  • #42 LO10 A PHASE 2, PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF SAROGLITAZAR MAGNESIUM 1 MG, 2 MG OR 4 MG VERSUS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE AND/OR NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS (EVIDENCES IV) Samer Gawrieh, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Mazen Noureddin, Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Nicole M. Loo, Hepatobiliary Cancer, Texas Liver Institute, Rizwana Mohseni, Catalina Research Institute, LLC, Vivek R. Awasty, Internal Medicine, Ohiohealth Marion General Hospital, Kenneth Cusi, Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, University of Florida, Kris V. Kowdley, Liver Care Network and Organ Care Research, Swedish Medical Center, Michelle Lai, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Eugene R. Schiff, Schiff Center for Liver Diseases, University of Miami School of Medicine, Deven V. Parmar, Zydus Discovery Dmcc, Pankaj R. Patel, Zydus Research Centre, Cadila Healthcare Ltd. and Naga P. Chalasani, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine Background:  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are major health problems without approved therapies. Pre-clinical studies suggest that Saroglitazar (a novel dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α/γ agonist) is an effective treatment for NAFLD/NASH. This phase-2, prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial was conducted to determine efficacy and safety of Saroglitazar Magnesium (Saro) 1 mg, 2 mg or 4 mg compared to placebo in patients with NAFLD/NASH.  Methods: A total 106 adult subjects with NAFLD/NASH who had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥50 U/L and body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to Saro 1 mg, 2 mg or 4 mg and placebo at 23 centers in the US. Primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change in ALT levels from baseline to week-16 in Saro groups vs placebo group. Key secondary efficacy endpoints included proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in ALT levels and change in liver fat content (measured by MR-PDFF) from baseline to week-16 in Saro groups vs placebo group.  Results:  Baseline characteristics were similar across the 4 study groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was met (Table). A significant reduction in mean ALT from baseline to week-16 was observed with Saro 1 mg (‑27.3%), 2 mg (‑33.1%), and 4 mg (‑44.3%) vs placebo (4.1%) (p<0.001 for all). A significantly higher proportion of patients had ≥50% reduction in mean ALT from baseline to week-16 with Saro 4 mg vs placebo (51.8% versus 3.5%; p<0.0001). At week-16, Saro 4 mg compared to placebo significantly reduced HOMA-IR (‑5.1 vs ‑2.5), triglycerides (‑70.3 vs ‑3.4), total cholesterol (‑24.2 vs ‑4.4), APRI (‑0.16 vs 0.09), and mean liver fat content (‑4.2% versus ‑0.3%) (p<0.05 for all). A significantly higher % of patients had reduction in liver fat content by >30% on Saro 4 mg vs placebo (40.7% vs 8%, p=0.006). There was not significant percent change in body weight with Saro 4 mg vs placebo (1.88% vs 0.28%, p=0.9). Overall, Saro was well-tolerated and no death or cardiovascular events occurred during the study.  Conclusion:  Saroglitazar Magnesium 4 mg significantly improved serum ALT, hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia in patients with NAFLD/NASH. Disclosures: Samer Gawrieh – Zydus: Grant/Research Support; Cirius: Grant/Research Support; Galmed: Grant/Research Support; Transmedics: Consulting; Mazen Noureddin – Allergan plc: Consulting; Gilead: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Pfizer: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Intercept: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Blade: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Fractyl: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Novartis: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; OWL: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Echosens: Speaking and Teaching; Intercept: Speaking and Teaching; Echosens: Speaking and Teaching; Abbott: Speaking and Teaching; Simply Speaking: Speaking and Teaching; Gilead: Grant/Research Support; Allergan: Grant/Research Support; Genfit: Grant/Research Support; BMS: Grant/Research Support; Galmed: Grant/Research Support; Conatus: Grant/Research Support; Enanta: Grant/Research Support; Novartis: Grant/Research Support; Shire: Grant/Research Support; Zydus: Grant/Research Support; Viking: Stock Shareholder; Ananetos: Stock Shareholder; Nicole M. Loo – Gilead: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Dova: Consulting; Kenneth Cusi – Cirius: Grant/Research Support; Inventiva: Grant/Research Support; Janssen: Grant/Research Support; Novartis: Grant/Research Support; Novo Nordisk: Grant/Research Support; Zydus: Grant/Research Support; BMS: Consulting; Deuterex: Consulting; Novo Nordisk: Consulting; Eli Lilly and Company: Consulting; Janssen Research and Development, LLC: Consulting; Poxel: Consulting; Amgen: Consulting; Echosens: Grant/Research Support; Eugene R. Schiff – Eiger: Grant/Research Support; Assembly Biosciences: Grant/Research Support; Galmed: Grant/Research Support; Zydus: Grant/Research Support; Celgene: Grant/Research Support; Astrazeneca: Advisory Committee or Review Panel; Beckman: Grant/Research Support; Biokit: Grant/Research Support; Bristol Myers: Grant/Research Support; Conatus: Grant/Research Support; Discovery Science: Grant/Research Support; Genfit: Grant/Research Support; Intercept: Grant/Research Support; Merck: Consulting; Novartis: Grant/Research Support; NovoNordisk: Grant/Research Support; Orasure Technologies: Grant/Research Support; Ortho Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support; Pfizer: Grant/Research Support; Prometheus Lab: Grant/Research Support; Roche Diagnostic: Grant/Research Support; Shire: Grant/Research Support; Siemens: Grant/Research Support; Target Pharma Solutions: Grant/Research Support; Tobira: Grant/Research Support; Zydus: Grant/Research Support; Deven V. Parmar – Sr Director & Head Clinical Zydus Discovery DMCC: Employment; The following people have nothing to disclose: Rizwana Mohseni, Michelle Lai, Pankaj R. Patel, Naga P. Chalasani Kris V. Kowdley: Cenicriviroc, GS-4997, GS-0976, Obeticholic acid, INT-747, Saroglitazar MG, Emricasan, EDP-305 Disclosure information not available at the time of publication: Vivek R. Awasty
  • #44 NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Juan Pablo Frias, MD, FACE: Clearly, we need to be aware of any safety and tolerability issues. There have been data, although not very well validated but in 1 or 2 long-term trials, showing there was the possibility of an increase in all-cause mortality in patients treated with vitamin E > 800 IU/day. There was also a trial that demonstrated greater risk of hemorrhagic stroke, although there was a reduced risk of ischemic stroke and a small potential for increase in prostate cancer, particularly in elderly men. For this reason, we really should be using vitamin E in select patients only: those who have NASH, whose disease has a potential of progressing, as well as those who have the worst prognosis. Again, the recommendations would be to use vitamin E in patients without type 2 diabetes and not use it in patients with diabetes.   I think we’re all familiar with some of the side effects of thiazolidinediones, one of which is edema and weight gain. Generally, it’s not a tremendous amount of weight gain but somewhere between 2 and 3 kg; these are averages shown here over 2-4 years. I think if we combine these agents—although they’re not recommended for NASH but for diabetes—with agents that can cause weight loss such as sodium- SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists, we can mitigate some of this weight gain. We do need to be careful particularly in patients who are using insulin therapy and have some diastolic dysfunction or some impairment that might put them at increased risk of congestive heart failure. In postmenopausal women with risk of osteoporotic fractures, it has been shown to increase this risk, so we need to be careful there as well; in these patients, I’ll often use a lower dose.   There were some studies showing a potential increase of bladder cancer, but subsequent trials and meta-analyses has not borne this out. Even so, in patients with known bladder cancer, pioglitazone is contraindicated.   The use of these agents should be personalized for select patients with histologically confirmed NASH after careful consideration of the risks and the benefits, as with any medication. Again, the key point is that these agents are not for patients with simple steatosis but for patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH.   Stephen A. Harrison, MD, COL (Ret.), FAASLD: What about safety/tolerability of these off-label recommended treatments? I mentioned before that the dose of vitamin E should be 800-1000 IU/day. There are some data showing it possibly increases all-cause mortality risk as well as hemorrhagic stroke and prostate cancer. I’ll also mention that the number needed to harm is quite high. Pioglitazone, on the other hand, is very frequently associated with water weight gain and overall weight gain. This weight gain occurs through the increase of fat deposition in the peripheral tissue and then water weight gain. As a result of the water weight gain, diastolic dysfunction and heart failure may be unmasked because patients with fatty liver often have increased stiffness in their right ventricle. There’s also risk for osteoporosis in women. The bladder cancer risk, quite frankly, has been mentioned, but I think it’s equivocal at best. Some studies show it’s increased; most studies show there’s no association. Ultimately, the use of these agents needs to be personalized for select patients with histopathologically confirmed NASH after carefully considering the risk to benefit ratio.
  • #48 incidence of nausea, constipation, and vomiting was higher in the 0.4-mg group
  • #49 Juan Pablo Frias, MD, FACE: OCA is an FXR agonist. FXR plays multiple roles in metabolism. In the liver, it reduces portal pressure. Downstream, it can reduce inflammation, which ultimately may reduce fibrosis, as well. Through CYP7A1, it blocks the rate-limiting step in the conversion of cholesterol to bile acids, and bile acids play a very important role in the pathogenesis of fatty liver disease.   FXR agonists cause an increase in LDL cholesterol levels and a decrease in HDL cholesterol levels. We don’t know yet whether this will cause long-term negative implications. OCA reduces hepatic triglyceride levels, as well. So, it causes a number of effects that could potentially improve not only steatosis and NASH but also fibrosis.   Stephen A. Harrison, MD, COL (Ret.), FAASLD: OCA is an FXR agonist. FXRs are central to multiple key pathways in animal models; they work to reduce portal pressure, and they work on SREBP-1 to ultimately decrease hepatic triglyceride levels. They increase beta-oxidation; they downregulate bile acids through an inhibition of CYP7A1, which ultimately has effects on stellate cell activation and fibrosis.
  • #53 209 randomized