Managing Rate Impacts
of Conservation
June 13, 2014
Drema Gross
Water Conservation Division Manager
Austin Water
• Started in early 1980s, continued through 1990s
– Education, incentives
• Increased attention to conservation in mid-2000s
– Code requirements, watering restrictions
• Prepaid water supply up to 201,000 acre-feet
– Current use between 140,000 and 167,000
– Estimated ~$15M/yr payment when trigger reached
• Growing population, high drought risk
Austin’s Conservation History
FY2011 Residential Rates
• Increase fixed portion of bill
– Concern about conservation discincentive, “regressive” charge, impact
on low users
• Implement Revenue Stability Fee
– Build reserve fund to cover unexpected losses
• Restructure volumetric tiers
– Lower starting points for Tiers 2-5
• Consider drought rates
• Revise sales projection methodology
– Assume “new normal” starting in 2008
Revenue Stability Strategies
FY14 Residential Rates
Questions?

Managing Rate Impacts of Conservation

  • 1.
    Managing Rate Impacts ofConservation June 13, 2014 Drema Gross Water Conservation Division Manager Austin Water
  • 2.
    • Started inearly 1980s, continued through 1990s – Education, incentives • Increased attention to conservation in mid-2000s – Code requirements, watering restrictions • Prepaid water supply up to 201,000 acre-feet – Current use between 140,000 and 167,000 – Estimated ~$15M/yr payment when trigger reached • Growing population, high drought risk Austin’s Conservation History
  • 4.
  • 5.
    • Increase fixedportion of bill – Concern about conservation discincentive, “regressive” charge, impact on low users • Implement Revenue Stability Fee – Build reserve fund to cover unexpected losses • Restructure volumetric tiers – Lower starting points for Tiers 2-5 • Consider drought rates • Revise sales projection methodology – Assume “new normal” starting in 2008 Revenue Stability Strategies
  • 6.
  • 7.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 5-year rolling average GPCD has dropped 13% since FY09