TOWARDS A MACHINE LEARNING BASED ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT SYSTEM FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT

Durreesamin Journal (ISSN: 2204-9827)
July Vol 4 Issue 2, Year 2018
1
TOWARDS A MACHINE LEARNING
BASED ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT
SYSTEM FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN
A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT
Yao Francois Michael Kra, 1840192845@qq.com, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Noah Kwaku Baah, baah.noah@gmail.com, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Imran Memon, imranmemon52@zju.edu.cn, College of Computer Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
William Gyasi-Mensah, kyfm349349@gmail.com, School of Finance and Economics Jiangsu University
ABSTRACT
Cloud computing has become the mainstream of
the emerging technologies for information interchange and
accessibility. With such systems, the information accessed
from any geographic location on this planet with some
decent kind of internet connection. Applying machine
learning together with artificial intelligence in dealing with
the problem of energy reduction in cloud data center is an
innovative idea. A large combination of Artificial
intelligence is playing a significant role in cloud
environment. For that matter, the Big organization
providers like Amazon have taken steps to ensure that they
can continue to expand their fast-growing cloud services to
commensurate with the fast growth of population. These
companies have built large data centers in remote parts of
the world to overcome a shortage of information. These
centers consume significant amounts of electrical energy.
There is often a lot of energy wastage. According to IDC
white paper, data centers have tremendously wasted
billions of energy regarding billing and cash. Additionally,
researchers have argued that by the year 2020 the energy
consumption rate would have doubled. Research in this
area is still a hot topic. This paper seeks to address the
energy efficiency issue at a Cloud Data Center using
machine learning methodologies, principles, and practices.
This article also aims to bring out possible future
implementation methods for artificially intelligent agents
that would help reduce energy wastage at a Cloud data
center and thus help ameliorate the great big energy
problem at hand.
Keywords: Cloud Computing; PUE; Energy
Efficiency, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence,
Cloud Service Provider (CSP) Virtualization
I. INTRODUCTION
Recent years, cloud computing has demonstrated,
established and founded itself as one of the brains and
drivers in modern technology. As a process paradigm
faculty economy of scale, when organized and used
effectively, the cloud computing presents significant
advantages relating to computation power whereas
reducing expenditures and saving energy. Massive data
centers are in places wherever the concept of cloud
computing involves life. Through virtualization technology,
data center resources and services became substantially
potential for several users to share, and to avoid having to
line up their infrastructure to try and do things that have
been completed within the cloud.
Efficient use of energy in cloud computing has been
receiving attention by researchers over the past decade.
Some studies have suggested various optimization
approaches to the challenge of minimizing the expenditure
of energy within cloud computing setting
[36],[37],[25],[20],[22]. Several scenarios also exist for
using machine instruction strategies to material supplies
and management within the cloud, with several goals.
(The study will provide a survey towards a machine
learning based artificially intelligent system for the
efficient use of energy in a cloud computing setting). (The
aim of this study area is to analyze and delve into energy
efficiency, and carry up to the machine learning research,
as well as support their invention in innovative ways
capable of producing preferred outcomes. As computing
has become very vast and sophisticated engine worldwide,
cloud computing as a traditional model delivers, computing
resources on cloud computing uses pay as you use method.
The public IT corporations like Microsoft, Google,
Amazon, and IBM have a unit of measurement running
expansive data knowledge Centres worldwide to handle
their always-rising requests. Notably, the rising demands
for cloud computing facilities have considerably multiplied
the power usage of knowledge centers, thereby making it
an important issue). The third drop in energy charge for an
outsized associate company like Google will reach over
1,000,000 dollars in value savings [35]. High power
consumption does not only interpret to the great value but
to boot leads to high carbon emissions that do not appear to

2
be environmentally sustainable. Power costs hugely rising,
information center instrumentality is overstretching power
and cooling infrastructures, and so the primary point has
not been about the current amount of data center emissions,
instead, the point that these emissions are rising faster than
the various carbon emission [35]. Among the compelling
primary rationales for energy underperformance in data
centers is that unused energy is wasted once the server
operates at a low load. Even at down usage, like 100
percent central processor Usage, the flexibility consumed is
over five hundredth of the peak power [36]. Dynamic
consolidation has tested to be a good economic technique
for energy cut down in data information centers by
switching off unused or less-utilized servers [36],[37].
However, reaching the aimed extent of Quality of Service
(QoS) between the user and a data center is vital. Hence,
Quality of Service, the periodic upgrade will save energy
whereas keeping an appropriate Quality of Service. The
standard of Service necessity formalized through Service
Level Agreement (SLA) that explains these features as
lower turnout, largest possible amount or latency produced
by the installed system. Moreover, virtualization is the most
present power controlling and resource distribution
technique used by data Knowledge Center. It permits a
physical server (host) to be shared among multiple Virtual
Machines (VMs) whereby each VM can run numerous
application tasks. The central processing unit and memory
resources are dynamically provided for a Virtual Machine,
per current resource requirements. It enables virtualization
for the requirements of energy efficiency in every data
center [35].
Our Contributions to article extended by:
1. Illustrating some problems towards machine learning
based mostly artificial agent to lop out the energy usage
within the large-scale data center.
2. Reviewing and analyzing various types agent entities
which may be applying exploiting machine learning
3. Identify problems within the existing systems to give
insight to new researchers in innovative ways to implement
energy huddles to handle the substance of massive energy
wastage within green data centers.
4. Additionally show that when exploiting AI will facilitate
data Centre’s manager to understand the prediction,
management and stop the worst-case situation from
occurring in reducing usage capability.
The research paper is organized as follow, section I
introduction, section I the background of the article,
Section III, the stated problem of the article, section IV
mathematical models for PUE state of the art. Part V and
VI respectively discussed privacy control and literature
review; section VII end up of the conclusion and the
possible future development.
II. BACKGROUND
People around the world these days are enjoying computers,
PC networks and applications to undertake and do most of
their business processes [25], communication, and social
networking [25]. As a result, the popularity of web-
primarily based applications is on the increase. Most of the
companies rendering these internet based applications use
cloud computing services to host their applications. One
can only imagine what amount methodology in power is
needed to tackle this common workload dilemma. However,
these works are mostly distributed across data centers
within a cloud computing setting.
The goal of cloud computing is to provide computing
resources as utilities, rather like today electricity, clean
water and telephoning services rendered as utilities. The
services provided by cloud computing is based on software
as a service (SaaS), infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and
platform as a service. A new aspect of cloud computing is
its acquisition model that depends on going to services and
its business model supported by purchase use. It has an
excellent access model that handles over the net to any
device and its particular model that is cycling the climbable,
elastic, dynamic, multi-tenant, and shareable. There are
differing types of cloud computing environments of which
Public cloud services offered by a 3rd party service
provider. Private cloud is extraordinarily like a public
cloud, the only real distinction between the private cloud is
based on the services managed within one organization.
Community cloud that controlled by a bunch of agencies
that have a regular goal or concern, like security. Hybrid
cloud, is therefore a mix of any of the various cloud
environments.
A) Machine Learning
Machine learning (ML) methods considered for materials
and power control within the wide-reaching data center
corresponding procedure in grid energy and cloud
technology. Considering the task consolidation policies,
which have been described in [35], it operates every job
with a small amount of data resources and takes into
account the programming aspect in cutting down energy
utilization [35]. The study adopted machine-learning
strategy as a method to explore the existing data of the
system, like Energy usage level, hundreds of processors
and task completion time; and contributes to the standard of
scheduling selections. The primary goal of the policy in [38]
was to maximize user contentment while keeping energy
usage down. In [38] an internet learning algorithmic
regulation was scheduled to vigorously choose diverse
consultants for forming energy controlling choices at
execution time, wherever every knowledgeable may be a
redesigned power management policy. Various experts
outperform one another beneath entirely different
workloads and hardware characteristics.
B) Learning Reinforcement
In [35] Reinforcement Learning (RL), the intelligent agent
gets the maximum resolution through trial and error
interaction with a current set with no prior information
regarding the surroundings. A framework of learning
reinforcement comprises of [1][35]:

3
▪ State area S: a group of states that intelligent
agent can provide representation for at any
surrounding area.
▪ Action area A: a group of measures that
intelligent agent can perform.
▪ A Learning reinforcement agent sends signal r: a
symbol that intelligent agent can receive from
different types of environment.
Actually, the indicator imitates the success or failure status
of the system when associated with an action which it has
taken place. Considering the fact of the signal, in [1] the
signal serves as punishment for the intelligent agent who
has accomplished an action based on pay before usage. Q-
learning [1] could pass as one of the first probable Learning
reinforcement agents which can be employed in numerous
areas of analysis [1]. At the iteration level of the Q-learning
algorithm, the intelligent agent firstly detects the system
state ‘s’ and selects the action in ‘a.' When describing the
work, the system run up to the following state ‘s,' and
obtains the supported signal in r. When updating Q value,
the equation calculates the start of next iteration level.
(1)[1]
Where Q(s, a) [1] signifies that the value of an intelligent
agent can take action within state s. Training percentage
determined which the recent one can overwrite proportion
of the new information. The agent learning level can
assume a price between zero and one; the worth of zero
implies that no training takes place by the algorithm; on the
other hand, the value of 1 shows that solely the first current
data is used. The reduction issue could be worth between
zero and one that gives additional weight to the sanctions
within the near future than the far future. Consequently,
once associate degree agent moves to state s once more, it
chooses the activity with the least Q-value. The approach
for selecting the simplest measures in state s is:
(2) [1]
Accordingly, the training agent’s objective is to seek out
Learning Reinforcement (RL)[1],[39] could be machine
learning Prototype has applied for power management in
wide-reaching data center systems. In Reinforcement
Learning, a decision-maker or agent observes the
environment and chooses an activity at every state[1]. After
every action has been undertaken, the agent gets a response
showing the value of the executed activity. The ultimate
objective of the agent is to study a policy for choosing the
most effective measures for all possible steps. Also,
researchers have shown the viability of RL methods in
resource distribution [41][42], energy control [36][42] and
self-optimizing memory controller [1] [43]. In [42] share
servers on the internets. Applications dynamically exploit
online, hybrid Reinforcement Learning to increase the
anticipated total of SLA payments in every application.
This hybrid method permits the RL regulator to bootstrap
from existing management policies, considerably cutting
down learning and expensiveness. The efficiency of the
process verified in the situation of an available information
data center image. Moreover, in [43], the power
management system level’s policy supported by
Reinforcement Learning provided a real gold reduction in
the energy usage. It studies the most favorable policy in the
absence any previous data of work. The researchers set the
delay in manufacturing activity as a performance challenge
whereas reducing energy usage. Looking at the prevalence
of Machine Learning based on power management methods,
the RL based learning mostly will investigate the trade-off
within the electrical performance design house and join to a
far efficient energy management policy.
The application of machine learning algorithms to existing
observance data provides a chance to improve Data Center
in operation effectiveness significantly. A typical large
scale Data Center generates several data points across
thousands of sensors each day. Nevertheless, this
information is never used for applications aside from
observation purposes. Advances in process power and
respect capabilities produce an outsized chance for machine
learning to guide best apply and improve Data Center
efficiency.
C) Artificial Intelligent
Intelligence commonly thought about because of the
capacity to gather expertise and logic concerning insight to
resolve compounded issues. Within the close to Future
Intelligent Machines, they can replace human abilities in
several ways. AI is the study and creation of intelligent
machines and software system capable of reasoning,
learning, gathering data, communicating, manipulating and
understanding the objects. John McCarthy coined the term
in 1956 as an aspect of technology involved with creating
computers that act similar to humans. Economical energy
use, generally merely referred to as energy efficiency, is the
objective to scale back the quantity of power needed to
produce product and services. For instance, Installing
fluorescent lights, semiconductor diode lights or natural
skylights minimizes the amount of energy necessary to
reach an equivalent degree of lighting compared with using
an old incandescent lightweight bulbs. Compact fluorescent
lights need a mere fraction of the power of incandescent
lights and will last from half dozen to ten times longer.
These are the bound advantages of energy efficiency:-
Energy observation Agent: This half is responsible for
inspection the usage of electricity. Energy view agent
compares current energy usage with historical data, records
the results associated reports an emergency when abnormal
information is revealed.
Energy effectiveness Analysis Agent: This agent is
accountable for information analyzing. Energy potency
analysis agent can classify the characteristics of different
users, and eventually verify the principle of energy
utilization, which used to make effective selections.
Decision-making Agent: This agent considers the results
of energy potency analysis agent and the gifting strategy
thoroughly, and makes correct picks once needed. At an
equivalent time, it will take the CMB output as an essential

4
reference. Finally, the agent generates new and reasonable
electricity theme to guide users.
Energy diagnosing Agent: Analyzes energy-using
instrumentation from the system aspect, estimates current
power consumption and offers additional references to
decision-making agent, thus serving to enhance energy
potency.
User Feedback Agent: Uses the service condition to
estimate the effectiveness of the system, measure the
strength of the model from the user aspect, and output
auxiliary suggestions to form period changes, improving
decision-making set up endlessly.
Information Intelligence Maintenance Agent: This agent
is responsible for all the system information’s maintenance
and classification in a very regular time, including user
profile, energy-using instrumentality information, energy
utilization information and information from measurement
points.
The constituent below shows the effectiveness of energy
savings:
Renewable Energy: The Renewable Energy has a possible
impact on health because it produces energy with a
significant reason and it has no pollution effect as coal and
nuclear power.
Intelligent Distribution: It has an artificial agent to which
every knowledge performed as human. Its experience
enables to predict and prevent some unusual distribution
system (e.g. street lights, doors, elevators, wireless and
many more)
Operation Centre: performs as a data center whereby
devices can be check and resolve specific problem within
the area employment
Smart home: it has an ability to control and check all
connected gadgets within office building and houses
Smart Connected Cities: It performs as public clouds to
which connect the cities with internet bandwidth related to
the aim of accessing information anywhere within the city.
PEVs: the PEVs are very efficient electric cars chargers
with a sort of less duration charging time
D. Deep Learning
Deep learning strategies illustrated with learning strategies
with multiple levels of representation, obtained by
composing straightforward; however nonlinear modules
that convert every illustration at one level start with a raw
data into the slightly new abstract level. With the
composition of enough such transformations, highly
complex functions often learned.
Deep learning is creating significant advances in resolution
issues that have resisted the most effective makes an
attempt of the synthetic intelligence agency for several
years [54]. It has clad to be superb at unearthing involving
systems in high-dimensional information and is thus
relevant to several domains of science, business and
government.
Since 2006, intensive, structured training, or additional
unremarkably referred to as deep learning or hierarchical
learning[60], has been known as a replacement space of
machine learning analysis [56],[61]. Throughout the
previous years, many methods have been created from deep
learning analysis and have already been affecting a good
vary of signal and data process. Working on the normal and
also innovate a widened scopes together with fundamental
aspects of machine learning and artificial intelligence in
[55],[56],[57],[58], [59].
E. Cloud Computing Load Prediction
One of the first important analytics applications for the SG.
Moreover, the handiness of the time interval information
has made it attainable to predict within the short term and
with greater correctness.
Fig: 1. Intelligent, smart grid architecture images
Source: A smart grid [44].Smart Buildings of the Future
Cyber aware, Deep Learning Powered, and Human
Interacting.
The figure 1 above described the need of intelligence
system which helps reduce energy wastage and at the same
becomes some sources of energy inefficiency.

5
Correct predictions are necessary for determining a short
term time operations as well as mid-term planning.
However, additionally, manufacturers have to have
an understanding concerning the purchases they need to
provide for extended scheming [45]. Several applications of
load prediction have been represented in literature
wherever many apply function statically, and machine
learning technologies used. For shorthand medium-term
prediction, time-series analysis and neural networks are
used [45], [47], [48]. A haul with short term time predicting
models has been the deficit in understanding concerning the
larger image as a result of not handling data concerning the
various classes of customers. In [49], a PCA-based
approach accustomed establishes the kind of demand
visage by such client categories. In [50], [45] a hybrid
system of SOMs and SVM was applied to predict mid-term
electricity load. The SOM was used to divide power usage
information into two teams that are then input into an SVM
in an exceedingly monitored way for load forecasting. In
[46], Espinoza et al. described on short-term time
prediction with hourly load data from a Belgian grid station
highlight that prediction and client identification are
reticulated and suggested a merged structure which
includes each. The first modeling relies on seasonal time-
series analysis, using the periodic auto-regression (PAR)
model [51], the periodic autoregression utilized in the
modeling of electricity costs [52]. The stationary attributes
obtained from these models are run through a k-means
clustering method to include various client descriptions.
III. PROBLEMS
The problem occurs in the fact that in a cloud computing
environment server consumes far more energy than they
need. Hence, lots of energy wasted due to intuitive to
energy efficiency. Computer servers in data centers account
for concerning a pair of worldwide energy demand,
growing concerning twelve-tone music a year, in line with
the cluster. The servers, Greenpeace aforementioned, will
suck up the maximum amount power as 50,000 average
U.S. homes. However, most of what supplies energy to the
cloud comes from coal energy instead of renewable sources
like wind and star, consistent with Greenpeace. Clusters of
information centers square measure rising in places just like
the geographical region, where coal-powered electricity is
reasonable and plentiful in the same cluster. In its report,
the organization narrowed in on ten major technical school
corporations, together with Apple, Twitter, and Amazon.
Recently, the cluster has waged a feisty fight against
Facebook, that depends on coal for 53.2% of its electricity,
consistent with Greenpeace. Several corporations, the
organization aforementioned, tightly guard data concerning
the environmental effect and power usage of their IT
operations. They additionally focus a lot on victimization
energy expeditiously than on sourcing it cleanly, previously
mentioned Greenpeace. Yahoo landed bonus points for
setting facilities near clean energy hot spots and efficient
coal-based power for direct 18.3% of its portfolio. Google
received commendation for its intensive support of the
wind and solar initiatives and for making a subsidiary,
Google Energy, that may get electricity straight from
separated clean energy producers. In 2005, the U.S. owned
10.3 million data centers gobbling up sufficient power to
supply all of the England for two months, consistent with
the web selling company WordStream. Every month,
electricity accustomed power inquiries on Google bring out
260,000 kilograms of greenhouse gas, and it is s to
sufficient supply a deep freezer for 5,400 years, consistent
with WordStream.
IV. Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) V Data center
Infrastructure Efficiency (DCiE)
Benchmarking information data hub’s power capability
might be a vital commencement for minimizing energy
usage and connected power expenditure. Effectiveness
Benchmarking permits us to grasp this level of
effectiveness with every data center, and has to institute
further effective optimum procedures; it aids in measuring
the efficiency of those efficiency methods. Power Usage
Effectiveness (PUE) and its shared data Centre
infrastructure Efficiency (DCiE) are usually preferred
criterion planned by the new Grid to aid IT Professionals to
ensure but energy economical info centers areas, and to
observe the impact of their efficiency efforts. The amount
instituted collectively incorporates a general benchmark
that it recommends, named Company Average info Centre
Efficiency (CADE). At their February 2009 Technical
Forum, the new Grid introduced new parameters named
Information Center Productivity (DCP) knowledge and
Data Centre energy Productivity (DCeP) that probed into
the relevant work created by your information center. All
benchmarks have their worth, and once used correctly, they
are going to be a helpful and essential tool for center
energy efficiency.
Data centers all around the world have a responsibility to
become green and eco-friendly. It starts with cutting their
energy costs and consumption. Traditional methods of
managing the energy efficiency of data centers are
evidently inefficient and obsolete. The PUE ratio of total
amount of energy used the in substitute variations inside

6
the landscape of
Fig: 2. Sketch of How the PUE and the DCE are calculated
Computing, some legal problems increase with cloud
computing, together with trademark infringement, security
considerations and sharing of proprietary information
resources.
With a computer data center facility [29], the lower an
organization is PUE the greener they are. An ideal PUE is
about 1.0. PUE developed by a group called The Green
Grid. It is a computation of how efficiently a computer data
center applies energy.
It is necessary to know the elements for the hundreds of the
standards of measurement, which may represent as follows:
1. IT equipment Power. It comprises the load related to all
of the IT instrumentation, such as figure, storage, and
network equipment, in conjunction with complementing
gadgets such as KVM switches, monitors, and
workstations/laptops accustomed monitor or otherwise
control the information center.
2. Total Facility Power. It involves all that supports the IT
equipment load such as:
❖ Power delivery elements run through as
Generators, UPS, PDUs, switchgear, heavy
batteries, and distribution losses outside to the IT
equipment.
❖ Cooling system elements like chillers, PC room
air conditioning units (CRACs), direct
enlargement air handler (DX) units, pumps, and
cooling towers.
❖ Computer network and storage nodes.
❖ Different miscellaneous element hundreds like
data center lighting.
The PUE and DCiE provide the simplest approach to
show:
❖ Opportunities to boost a data center's operational
efficiency. However center compares with
competitive data centers. If the PUE Data center
operators are rising, then the designs and
processes will get over time.
❖ Opportunities to repurpose energy for added IT
equipment.
While each of those metrics is an equivalent, they will be
accustomed to express the power sharing within the
knowledge center otherwise. As an example, if a PUE is
decided to be 3.0, this means that the information center's
demand is thrice bigger than the power required to supply
energy to the IT instrumentation. Additionally, the
magnitude relation uses as a multiplier factor for conniving
the $64000 effect of the system’s power demands. For
instance, if a server requests five hundred watts and the
PUE for the data center is 3.0, then the ability from the
utility Grid required to deliver five hundred watts to the
server is 1500 watts. DCiE
In A Data center, PUE is calculated by:
(3)
Moreover, its similarities with DCIE described as:
; (4)
It must be well noted here at this point that the valuation for
Total Facility Energy and IT Equipment Energy will vary
and are likely to change based on a data center's layout.
(5)
Companies like Google have pioneered many attempts to
cut energy costs at their data centers. One of such attempt
is an artificially intelligent system developed by its
subsidiary Deep Mind that led to a 15 percent
improvement in power efficiency. The following diagram
illustrates the layout of the Google data center and how the
PUE resolved in:

7
Data Source: ensuring measurement on Google data
center, Google comprises servers, storage, and networking
equipment as IT equipment power. We recognize
everything else overhead power [33].
Fig: 4. Flowchart of already done data center
Total Facility Power calculated at or close to the ability
utility’s meter(s) to correctly mirror the facility coming into
the data center. It could amount to the whole energy used
within the data center. Center-only parts of a building
utility meter ought to set the calculation of energy that is
not supposed to be used within the data center would lead
to faulty PUE and DCiE metrics. For instance, if a
knowledge center works in an office block, gross energy
supplied from the utility is the addition of the whole
Facility Power for the data center, and therefore, the total
power used by the non-data center offices. In this case, the
data center administrator would need to live or predict the
number of the energy utilized by the non-data center offices
(an estimate can include some mistakes into the
computations). IT instruments power would measure on
balance power conversion, switching, and acquisition
finalized and before the IT instrumentation itself. A
possible measure purpose would be to the outcome of the
PC space power distribution units (PDUs). This
mensuration ought to represent the whole energy supplied
to the figure instrumentation racks within the information
center.
Fig: 3. Structure green data center architecture
The PUE will vary from 1.0 to time. Acceptably, a
PUE worth approaching from zero to one would show
100% efficiency (i.e. all power utilized by IT equipment
only). Presently, there are no exhaustive information data
sets that show truth expansion of the PUE for information
centers.
Some preliminary work indicates that a lot of data centers
might have a PUE from zero to three or greater; however,
with the right style, a PUE worth from zero to six ought to
be achievable. Shows that the twenty-two information data
centers measured had PUE values within the 1.3 to 3.0
ranges. Some researchers have indicates that PUE values of
2.0 are doable with correct design6. However, there is
presently no comprehensive business data information set
that shows how the Green Grid feels, which is vital to start
measuring information of data centers' effectiveness,
though the present approach needs information
manipulation.

8
Additionally, the Green Grid conjointly urges information
data center providers to share DCiE outcomes, which can
facilitate every information data center owner higher
analysis of their mensuration methodology similarly as
perceived in their performance, however, compared with
the remainder of the trade.
Fig: 5. Observation of where energy utilized
Correct PUE statistics for information data centers. Once
more, there is no universal consensus on what makes up an
economic or inefficient data center. Within the future, the
Green Grid can provide values that profile target PUE and
DCiE metrics for a range of typical data center
configurations. In the short term, the Green Grid suggests
that information center infrastructure begins utilization
either with the PUE or DCiE metrics. Whereas the
measuring points might not be outlined, the Green Grid
feels which is vital to start measurement information of
data center efficiency, even if the method presently needs
information manipulation.
VI. REVIEWED LITERATURE
A. Cloud Computing Authorization
U.S. Federal Agencies “are engaged in a geographical point
of Management and Budget to use a system discussed to as
Fed-RAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management
Program) to assess and authorize cloud product and
services. As it has shown, the Federal Congress of
commerce Organised by Steven VanRoekel noted the fact
to federal agency Chief Information Officers on 8th
of
December, 2011, about shaping but the federal agencies
needed to use Fed-RAMP [63][64]. Fed-RAMP comprises
of a group of agency Exceptional Publication 800-53
security panels specifically elect to issues protection in
cloud environments. A group has been recognized publicly
for the FIPS 199 at the lower categorization and thus the
FIPS 199 moderate categorization [64]. The Fed-RAMP
program has also set up Joint Certification Board (JAB)
comprising of Chief Information Officers from Defense,
DHS, and GSA [63][64]. The JAB is responsible for
developing certification benchmark for third party
organization Worldwide and also assesses the World
Health Organization performance assessments on cloud
solutions level. The JAB also evaluates license packages
that can grant temporary permission, allowing the operation.
The government agencies overseeing the services have the
final duty for final authority.
B. Legal Over Cloud Computing
The additional dissimilarities classified the environment of
computing; some legal issues increase with cloud
computing, in conjunction with trademark infringement,
security concerns and sharing of proprietary data resources.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation discussed a conflicted
issues about the United States government; concerning the
Mega transfer confiscation methodology, considering
people losing their property privileges by storing
information on a cloud computing service[68]. One to three
significant but hardly mentioned disadvantage with cloud
computing is that the problem of World Health
Organization is in "possession" of the knowledge[69][64].
If the cloud company is the "custodian" of the data, then a
particular set of rights would apply. However, it is bringing
certain disadvantages inside the legalities of cloud
computing, that is, the problem of legal possession of the
data. Many terms are of Service Level Agreements area
unit that is silent on the question of ownership. The legal
issues are not limited to the first amendment during which
the cloud-based application is actively getting used
[64][70]. That should straighten things that could happen
when the clients finish up the relationship with others. With
important issues, things might be an event going to happen
before leveraging the deployment of the application in the
cloud environment [64]. Though, within the occurrence of
provider failures or liquidation, the state property
information might become distorted.
C. Cloud computing Vendor lock-in Right
Cloud computing remains comparatively new, standard
developed. Several cloud platforms and services are
proprietary, which means that has engineered on the precise
criteria, tools, and protocols developed by the explicit
merchant for its particular cloud giving. It may build
migration off a proprietary cloud platform prohibitively
sophisticated and highly-priced.
Three forms of merchant lock-in will occur with cloud
computing[64][72]:
Clouds Platform lock-in: Cloud services tend to be
engineered on one amongst many possible virtualization
platforms, for instance, VMWare or Xen. Migrating from a
cloud supplier utilization of one platform to a cloud
provider employing an entirely different platform can be
terribly sophisticated[64][72].
Clouds Data lock-in: Since the computing cloud remains
novel, the standards of possession. The World Health
Organization owns the data once it appears on a cloud
platform, that is not, however, developed, that might build
it sophisticated if cloud computing users ever conceived as
moving knowledge Off a cloud vendor's platform[64][72].

9
Clouds Tool's lock-in: The tools engineered to manage a
clouded atmosphere which is not compatible with various
types of each virtual and physical infrastructure, those tools
can solely be ready to be administered by knowledge or
apps that board the vendor's explicit cloud
atmosphere[64][72].
When the heterogeneous cloud computing is delineated as a
kind of cloud environment that forestalls merchant lock-in,
it aligns with enterprise information data centers that are
operating hybrid cloud models[64][73]. The absence of
merchant lock-in lets cloud director choose his or her
selection of supervisors for specific tasks to deploy
virtualized infrastructures to alternative enterprises while
not the necessity to think about the flavor of a supervisor
within the alternative company[64][73].
A different cloud has taken into account one that has on-
premises non-public clouds, public clouds, and software-as-
a-service clouds. Heterogeneous clouds will work with
environments that are not virtualized, like old knowledge
centers. Different clouds additionally yield the utilization of
piece components, like hypervisors, servers, and storage,
from multiple vendors.
Cloud piece components, like cloud storage systems,
provide arthropod genus, however it usually incompatible
with one another. The result is sophisticated migration
between backends and makes it tough to integrate
knowledge unfold across various location. It has been
delineating as a tangle of merchant lock-in[64][74]. The
answer to the current is for clouds to adopt common
standards[64].
Heterogeneous cloud computing differs from homogenized
clouds, which delineated as those efficient, logical building
blocks provided by one merchant[64][73][75]. Intel chief of
high-density computing, Jason Waxman, “ estimated as an
expression that a homogenized system of fifteen thousand
servers would value about six million US dollars for an
additional cost and “ megawatts” power utilsation[64][75].
C. Cloud Computing Open standards
Cloud infrastructure providers naturally expose traditional
APIs services but additionally distinctive to their
implementation and so not practical [64][76]. Some
vendors have approved and adopted others APIs[76], and
there are some open standards ongoing development,
delivering ability, and movability. in the year 2012, the
Open Standard was broadened with business support by
OpenStack[77]. In 2010, National Aeronautic Space
Administration and Rackspace presented a probable rule to
the OpenStack Foundation[64][78][79]. OpenStack
followers epitomize and endorse those group which keeps
the clouds technologies such as AMD, Intel, Dell, HP,
IBM, Yahoo, Huawei and currently VMware for
empowerment[64][79].
V. Cloud Computing Privacy Control
D. Cloud Computing Privacy solution
Solutions to privacy in cloud computing embrace policy
and
Legislation likewise as end users' decisions for a way data
is held on[64][80][81].The cloud service infrastructure
desires to establish clear and relevant policies that describe,
how the data of every cloud user will be accessed and used
[64][81]. Cloud service users will cipher data that process
or hold on at intervals the cloud can forestall[64]. The
unauthorized access and Science cryptography mechanisms
are the simplest choices. Additionally, authentication and
integrity protection mechanisms make sure that data solely
goes where the client needs it to travel, and it has not
changed in transit [82].
Strong authentication may be an obligatory demand for any
cloud reading[81][82]. User authentication is that the
primary basis for access management, and especially
within the cloud setting, authentication, and access
management are additional vital than ever since the cloud,
and every one of its data is in public access. Cloud ID
[64][80] provides a privacy-preserving cloud-based and
cross-enterprise identity verification solutions for this
downside[81]. It links the counsel of the users to their life
science associated stores it in an encrypted fashion[64][82].
The creative use of a searchable cryptography technique,
identity verification is performed within the encrypted
domain to form positive that the cloud supplier or potential
attackers do not gain access to any sensitive data or maybe
the contents of the individual queries[64][80].
E Cloud Computing Agreement
To become rules organized by FISMA, HIPAA, and SOX
within the United state of America, the information
Protection Directive within the EU and also the MasterCard
industry's PCI DSS, users might get to adopt community
and hybrid deployment models that are dearer and should
provide restricted edges”[30]. However, Google is
organized to "manage and meet additional government
policy necessities on the far side FISMA, " and Rackspace
Cloud or QubeSpace can claim PCI compliance.
Many suppliers conjointly acquire associate degree SAS
seventy sort II audits. However, this has been criticized as a
result of the selected set of goals and standards determined
by the auditor and also the auditee are typically not
disclosed and may vary widely. Suppliers create this data
obtainable for the asking, beneath a non-disclosure
agreement.
Customers within the EU getting with cloud suppliers
outside the EU/EEA got to adhere to the EU rules on
export of private information.
A multitude of laws and regulations have forced specific
compliance necessities onto several corporations that
collect, generate or store information. These policies might
dictate a vast array of knowledge storage systems.
However significant data should maintain, the method used
for deleting information, and even certain recovery plans.
The U. S insurance movability and answerability Act

10
(HIPAA) need a contingency set up that has information
backups, data recovery, and information access throughout
emergencies.
The privacy laws of Svizzera demand that non-public
information, together with emails, physically keep in
Svizzera.
In the UK, the Civil Contingencies Act of 2004 sets forth
steerage for a business contingency set up that has policies
for information storage. In a virtualized cloud computing
atmosphere, customers might grasp precisely wherever
their data is being stored. In fact, information could also
maintain across multiple data centers to enhance
responsibility, increased performance, and supply
redundancies. This geographic dispersion might create it
more durable to establish legal jurisdiction if disputes arise.
VII.CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
In this paper, we sought to implement artificially intelligent
agents that would help reduce energy wastage at Cloud
data centers and thus contribute to improving the great big
energy problem that all big data centers face in today’s
world. We have a look at the different ways in which
machine learning and artificial intelligence mechanisms
and methodologies can be used towards energy efficiency
in a cloud data center. In future work, we hope to consider
deep learning methods in reducing power consumption in
Data Centre much further.
REFERENCES
[1] Farahnakian, F., Liljeberg, P., & Plosila, J. (2014,
February). Energy-efficient virtual machines
consolidation in cloud data centers using
reinforcement learning. In Parallel, Distributed
and Network-Based Processing (PDP), 2014
22nd Euromicro International Conference on
(pp. 500-507). IEEE.
[2] H. Allcott and M. Greenstone, “Is There an
Energy Efficiency Gap?,” in Energy Efficiency,
2013, pp. 133–161.
[3] S. Backlund, P. Thollander, J. Palm, and M.
Ottosson, “Extending the energy efficiency gap,”
Energy Policy, vol. 51, pp. 392–396, 2012.
[4] M. G. Patterson, “What is energy efficiency?
Concepts, indicators, and methodological issues,”
Energy Policy, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 377–390, 1996.
[5] P. Linares and X. Labandeira, “Energy
efficiency: Economics and policy,” J. Econ.
Surv., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 573–592, 2010.
[6] Iea, Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and
Efficiency. 2008.
[7] Dec, “The Energy Efficiency Strategy: The
Energy
[8] Efficiency Opportunity in the UK,” Dep. Energy
Clim.
[9] Chang., no. November, p. 30 pp., 2012.
[10] A. A. B. Lovins, “Energy efficiency, taxonomic
overview,” Encycl. Energy, vol. 401, no.
September, pp. 383–401, 2004.
[11] L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, and D. Velázquez,
“Revisiting energy efficiency fundamentals,”
Energy Efficiency, vol. 6, no. 2. pp. 239–254,
2013.
[12] V. Oikonomou, F. Becchis, L. Steg, and D.
Russolillo, “Energy saving and energy efficiency
concepts for policy making,” Energy Policy, vol.
37, no. 11, pp. 4787–4796, 2009.
[13] CIBSE GUIDE F, “CIBSE Guide F: Energy
efficiency in buildings,” Energy Effic. Build.
Chart. Inst. Build. Serv. Eng. London, 2nd Ed., p.
204, 2004.
[14] A. B. Jaffe and R. N. Stavins, “The energy-
efficiency gap What does it mean?,” Energy
Policy, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 804–810, 1994.
[15] L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, I. R. Maestre, and J.
F. Coronel, “Constructing HVAC energy
efficiency indicators,” Energy Build., vol. 47, pp.
619–629, 2012.
[16] M. Croucher, “Potential problems and limitations
of energy conservation and energy efficiency,”
Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 5795–5799,
2011.
[17] M. Ryghaug and K. H. Sørensen, “How energy
efficiency fails in the building industry,” Energy
Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 984–991, 2009.
[18] A. B. Lovins, “Energy End-Use Efficiency,”
Most, no. September, pp. 1–25, 2005.
[19] H. Herring, “Energy efficiency - A critical view,”
Energy, vol. 31, no. 1 SPEC. ISS. pp. 10–20,
2006.
[20] J. M. Cullen and J. M. Allwood, “Theoretical
efficiency limits for energy conversion devices,”
Energy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2059–2069, 2010.
[21] K. Gillingham, R. Newell, and K. Palmer,
“Energy Efficiency Policies: A Retrospective
Examination,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resources.,
vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 161–192, 2006.

11
[22] A. B. Jaffe, R. G. Newell, and R. N. Stavins,
“Economics of energy efficiency,” Encycl.
Energy, vol. 2, pp. 79–90, 2004.
[23] M. G. Patterson, “What is energy efficiency?,”
Energy Policy, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 377–390, 1996.
[24] B. W. Ang, “Monitoring changes in economy-
wide energy efficiency: From energy-GDP ratio
to composite efficiency index,” Energy Policy,
vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 574–582, 2006.
[25] H. C. Granade, J. Creyts, A. Derkach, P. Farese,
S. Nyquist, and K. Ostrowski, “Unlocking
Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy,”
McKinsey Glob. Energy Mater., pp. 1–165, 2009.
[26] I. G. Hamilton, P. J. Steadman, H. Bruhns, A. J.
Summerfield, and R. Lowe, “Energy efficiency in
the British housing stock: Energy demand and the
Homes Energy Efficiency Database,” Energy
Policy, vol. 60, pp. 462–480, 2013.
[27] J. Palm and P. Thollander, “An interdisciplinary
perspective on industrial energy efficiency,”
Appl. Energy, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 3255–3261,
2010.
[28] Energy Efficiency Models Implemented in a
Cloud Computing http://worldcomp-
proceedings.com/proc/p2013/GCA3885.pdf
(accessed March 27, 2017).
[29] Google Warns That NSA Is Breaking Internet -
Hit & Run ..,
http://reason.com/blog/2014/10/10/google-warns-
that-nsa-is-breaking-intern (accessed March 27,
2017).
[30] Energy Efficiency Models Implemented in a
Cloud Computing .., http://worldcomp-
proceedings.com/proc/p2013/GCA3885.pdf
(accessed March 27, 2017).
[31] ADVANCED M/E PUE & DCIE Assessments,
http://www.amepservices.com/downloads/AMEP
PUE-DCIEAssessmentServices.pdf (accessed
March 27, 2017).
[32] Cloud computing issues - Wikipedia,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing_i
ssues (accessed March 27, 2017).
[33] https://www.coursehero.com/file/p55ajq1/98-
Intel-General-Manager-of-high-density (accessed
March 27, 2017).
[34] 98 Intel General Manager of high-density
computing Jason ..,
https://www.coursehero.com/file/p55ajq1/98-
Intel-General-Manager-of-high-density (accessed
March 27, 2017).
[35] Google Data Centers ."Efficiency: How we do it"
retrieved
fromhttps://www.google.com/about/datacenters/e
fficiency/internal/#content , on 2017/03/09
[36] Computing's Energy Problem:
www.futurearchs.org/sites/default/files/horowitz-
ComputingEnergyISSCC.pdfCRAY-1. Page 6.
Supporting Evidence. 6
http://cpudb.stanford.edu/. Page 7. Houston, We
Have A Problem. Seven
http://cpudb.stanford.edu/.
[37] G. A. Qureshi, R. Weber, H. Balakrishnan, J.
Guttag, and B. Maggs,“ Cutting the electric bill
for Internet-scale systems,” Proceedings of the
ACM SIGCOMM 2009 conference on Data
communication, pp.123-134, 2009.
[38] J. Ll. Berral, I. Goiri1, R. Nou, F. Julia, J.
Guitart, R. Gavaldà and J.Torres; “Towards
energy-aware scheduling in data centers using
machine learning”, Proceedings of the 1st
International Conference on Energy-Efficient
Computing and Networking, pp. 215-224, 2010.
[39] A. Beloglazov, J.Abawajy, R.Buyya,” Energy-
aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient
management of data centers for cloud
computing,” Journal of Future Generation
Computer Systems, vol.28, pp.755-768, 2012.
[40] G. Dhiman and T. S. Rosing, “ System-level
power management using online learning”,
Proceedings of the Computer-Aided Design of
Integrated Circuits and Systems (CADICS), pp.
676–689, 2009.
[41] R.S.Sutton, A.G.Barto, “Reinforcement
Learning: AnIntroduction”,MIT Press,1998.
[42] J. Rao, X. Bu, C.-Z. Xu, L. Wang, and G. Yin. “
Vconf: a reinforcement learning approach to
virtual machine auto configuration,” Proceedings
of the 6th International Conference on
Autonomic Computing ( ICAC), pp. 137-146,
2009.
[43] G. Tesauro, N. K. Jong, R. Das, and M. N.
Bennani, “ A hybrid reinforcement learning
approach to autonomic resource allocation,”
Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on Autonomic Computing ( ICAC),
pp. 65–73, 2006.
[44] Y. Tan, W. Liu, and Q. Qiu, “Adaptive power
management using reinforcement learning,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on
Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD ’09), pp 461–
467, 2009.
[45] E. Ipek, O. Mutlu, J. F. Martinez, and R.
Caruana. “Self-optimizing memory controllers: A
reinforcement learning approach,” Proceedings of
the 35th Annual International Symposium on
Computer Architecture ( ISCA), pp.39-50, 2008.
[46] Manic, Milos, Kasun Amarasinghe, Juan J.
Rodriguez-Andina, and Craig Rieger. "Intelligent
Buildings of the Future: Cyberwar, Deep
Learning Powered, and Human Interacting."
IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 10, no. 4
(2016): 32-49.
[47] Alahakoon, D., & Yu, X. (2016). Smart
electricity meter data intelligence for future
energy systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Informatics, 12(1), 425-436.
[48] M. Espinoza, C. Joye, R. Belmans, and B.
DeMoor,“Short-term load forecasting, profile

12
identification, and customer segmentation: A
methodology based on periodic time series,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 3, pp.
1622–1630, Aug. 2005.
[49] K.-H. Kim, H.-S. Youn, and Y.-C. Kang, “Short-
term load forecasting for special days in
anomalous load conditions using neural networks
and fuzzy inference method,” IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 559–565, May 2000.
[50] H. Pao, “Forecasting electricity market pricing
using artificial neural networks,” Energy
Convers. Manage., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 907–912,
2007
[51] H. Liao and D. Niebur, “Load profile estimation
in electric transmission networks using
independent component analysis,” IEEE Trans.
Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 707–715, May
2003
[52] J. Nagi, K. S. Yap, S. K. Tiong, and S. K.
Ahmed, “Electrical power load forecasting using
hybrid self-organizing maps and support vector
machines,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Power Eng. Optim.
Conf. (PEOCO’08), Jun. 2008, pp. 51–56.
[53] D. Osborn and J. Smith, (1989) “The
performance of periodic autoregressive models in
forecasting seasonal U.K. consumption,” J. Bus.
Econ. Statist., vol. 7, pp. 117–127. [52] G.
Guthrie and S. Videbeck, “High-frequency
electricity spot price dynamics: An intra-day
markets approach,” New Zealand Inst. Study of
Competition Regul., Tech. Rep. 367760, 2002
[Online]. Available:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=367760 accessed on
June. 29, 2017.
[54] Jaiswal, S., Gupta, A., & Kanojiya, S. K. (2016).
Optimization of Energy Consumption via
Artificial Intelligence: A Study. SAMRIDDHI: A
Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering, and
Technology, 8(1).
[55] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015).
Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
[56] I. Arel, C. Rose, and T. Karnowski. , (2010)
“Deep machine learning a new frontier in
artificial intelligence.” IEEE Computational
Intelligence Magazine, 5:13–18
[57] Y. Bengio.( 2009) Learning deep architectures
for AI. in Foundations and trends in Machine
Learning, 2(1):1–127.
[58] Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent. (2013)
Representation learning: A review and new
perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI),
38:1798–1828.
[59] L. Deng. (2011) An overview of deep-structured
learning for information processing. In
Proceedings of Asian-Pacific Signal &
Information Processing Annual Summit and
Conference (APSIPA-ASC).
[60] L. Deng, J. Li, K. Huang, Yao, D. Yu, F. Seide,
M. Seltzer, G. Zweig, X. He, J. Williams, Y.
Gong, and A. Acero.(2013a) Recent advances in
deep learning for speech research at Microsoft. In
Proceedings of International Conference on
Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASS).
[61] Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014). Deep learning:
methods and applications. Foundations and
Trends® in Signal Processing, 7(3–4), 197-387.
[62] G. Hinton, S. Osindero, and Y. Teh. (2006) A
fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets.
Neural Computation, 18:1527–1554.
[63] "FedRAMP". U.S. General Services
Administration. 2012-06-13. Retrieved 2017-07-
03
[64] Cloud computing issues by Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki?curid
=43204134#cite_note-25 retrieved from 2017-
07-03
[65] "FISMA compliance for federal cloud computing
on the horizon in 2010". SearchCompliance.com.
Retrieved 2010-08-22.
[66] "Google Apps and Government". Official Google
Enterprise Blog. 2009-09-15. Retrieved 2010-08-
22.
[67] "Cloud Hosting is Secure for Take-off: Mosso
Enables The Spreadsheet Store, an Online
Merchant, to become PCI Compliant". Rackspace.
2009-03-14. Retrieved 2017-07-04.
[68] Cohn, Cindy; Samuels, Julie (31 October 2012).
"Megaupload and the Government's Attack on
Cloud Computing". Electronic Frontier
Foundation. Retrieved 2017-07-04.
[69] Maltais, Michelle (26 April 2012). "Who owns
your stuff in the cloud". Los Angeles Times.
[70] Chambers, Don (July 2010). "Windows Azure:
Using Windows Azure’s Service Bus to Solve

13
Data Security Issues" (PDF). Rebus Technologies.
[71] McKendrick, Joe. (2011-11-20) "Cloud
Computing's Vendor Lock-In Problem: Why the
Industry is Taking a Step Backward," Forbes.com
[72] Hinkle, Mark. (2010-6-9) "Three cloud lock-in
considerations," Zenoss Blog
[73] Staten, James (2012-07-23). "Gelsinger brings
the 'H' word to VMware." ZDNet.
[74] vada, Eirik T. (2012-06-11) "Creating Flexible
Heterogeneous Cloud Environments," page 5,
Network and System Administration, Oslo
University College.
[75] Gannes, Liz. GigaOm, "Structure 2010: Intel vs.
the Homogeneous Cloud," June 24, 2010
[76] VMware Launches Open Source PaaS Cloud
Foundry". 2011-04-21. Retrieved 2017-07-04.
[77] Jon Brodkin (July 28, 2008). "Open source fuels
growth of cloud computing, software-as-a-
service". Network World. Retrieved 2017-07-04.
[78] AGPL: Open Source Licensing in a Networked
Age". Redmonk.com. 2009-04-15. Retrieved
2017-07-04.
[79] "Did OpenStack Let VMware Into The
Henhouse?". InformationWeek. 2012-10-19.
[80] Haghighat, M., Zonouz, S., & Abdel-Mottaleb, M.
(2015). CloudID: Trustworthy Cloud-based and
Cross-Enterprise Biometric Identification. Expert
Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7905–7916.
[81] Ryan, Mark (January 2011). "Cloud Computing
Privacy Concerns on Our Doorstep.". ACM.
[82] Sen, Saydip (2013). "Security and Privacy Issues
in Cloud Computing." In Ruiz-Martinez,
Pereniguez-Garcia, and Marin-Lopez.
Architectures and Protocols for Secure
Information Technology. USA: IGI-Global. ar
xiv:1303.4814 
.

TOWARDS A MACHINE LEARNING BASED ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT SYSTEM FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to TOWARDS A MACHINE LEARNING BASED ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT SYSTEM FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT

More from Durreesamin Journal Australia (ISSN: 2204-9827)

Recently uploaded

TOWARDS A MACHINE LEARNING BASED ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT SYSTEM FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT