This document discusses standards-based world language instruction and the ongoing relevance of standards after more than 15 years. It provides an overview of a workshop that aims to reaffirm the value of standards-based instruction, help teachers plan standards-aligned lessons, and prepare for 21st century challenges. The document reviews the five goal areas of the national standards, known as the 5Cs, and how standards have helped unite the language teaching profession and shift the focus to what students can do with the language. It also discusses both the successes some districts have seen in implementing standards and the challenges that remain for full adoption.
Addressing the Needs of Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education...Andrea DeCapua
CoTESOL 2012 presentation on students with limited/interrupted formal education. Includes overview of our instructional model, Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) and innovative teaching approaches, including the flipped classroom
Teacher preparation for students with limited formal schoolingAndrea DeCapua
The teachers identified several early literacy practices from K-2 classrooms that they found transferable to their adult LESLLA contexts. They implemented practices like morning messages, routines, and independent reading time. The teachers transformed these practices by adapting them for their adult students, such as using morning messages to preview the day's activities. Through participating in the professional development study circle, the teachers realized the importance of establishing routines and community norms in their classrooms, as the K-2 teachers had mastered. They found that many practices from the elementary classrooms could be adapted to support both literacy learning and classroom community-building among their adult students.
Students with limited or interrupted education (SLIFE) often come with different learning paradigms from those their teachers know and expect. I present the Intercultural Communication Framework (ICF), which takes a cultural approach to helping teachers better understand SLIFE in order to plan and implement appropriate teaching practices.
The document summarizes four presentations on the characteristics of SIFE (Students with Interrupted Formal Education) students and their experiences in language classrooms.
Browder's presentation found that low English proficiency on arrival, below grade-level math skills, and low L2 literacy correlated with low English gains for SIFE students. Years of schooling alone was not a reliable predictor.
Young's study observed limited opportunities for an oral SIFE student to interact with peers or answer open questions, as she spent most of her time copying from the board.
Bigelow & King found that a SIFE student brought strong task focus and completion skills to paired reading activities, helping
Implementing a Mutually Adaptive Model of Instruction for ESL LIteracy in Com...Andrea DeCapua
Immigrant students with limited formal schooling have assumptions and experiences that are very different from those of their teachers. Our instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) addresses the issues these students encounter by reducing cultural dissonance and transitioning them to formal schooling. We describe the implementation of MALP in community-based adult language and literacy programs and examine how this culturally responsive model encouraged participation, developed a sense of community, and reduced cultural dissonance.
Engaging Adult Learners with Limited or Interrupted Formal EducationAndrea DeCapua
An overview of our instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm, and the use of surveys with learners to build different ways of thinking
This document discusses standards-based world language instruction and the ongoing relevance of standards after more than 15 years. It provides an overview of a workshop that aims to reaffirm the value of standards-based instruction, help teachers plan standards-aligned lessons, and prepare for 21st century challenges. The document reviews the five goal areas of the national standards, known as the 5Cs, and how standards have helped unite the language teaching profession and shift the focus to what students can do with the language. It also discusses both the successes some districts have seen in implementing standards and the challenges that remain for full adoption.
Addressing the Needs of Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education...Andrea DeCapua
CoTESOL 2012 presentation on students with limited/interrupted formal education. Includes overview of our instructional model, Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) and innovative teaching approaches, including the flipped classroom
Teacher preparation for students with limited formal schoolingAndrea DeCapua
The teachers identified several early literacy practices from K-2 classrooms that they found transferable to their adult LESLLA contexts. They implemented practices like morning messages, routines, and independent reading time. The teachers transformed these practices by adapting them for their adult students, such as using morning messages to preview the day's activities. Through participating in the professional development study circle, the teachers realized the importance of establishing routines and community norms in their classrooms, as the K-2 teachers had mastered. They found that many practices from the elementary classrooms could be adapted to support both literacy learning and classroom community-building among their adult students.
Students with limited or interrupted education (SLIFE) often come with different learning paradigms from those their teachers know and expect. I present the Intercultural Communication Framework (ICF), which takes a cultural approach to helping teachers better understand SLIFE in order to plan and implement appropriate teaching practices.
The document summarizes four presentations on the characteristics of SIFE (Students with Interrupted Formal Education) students and their experiences in language classrooms.
Browder's presentation found that low English proficiency on arrival, below grade-level math skills, and low L2 literacy correlated with low English gains for SIFE students. Years of schooling alone was not a reliable predictor.
Young's study observed limited opportunities for an oral SIFE student to interact with peers or answer open questions, as she spent most of her time copying from the board.
Bigelow & King found that a SIFE student brought strong task focus and completion skills to paired reading activities, helping
Implementing a Mutually Adaptive Model of Instruction for ESL LIteracy in Com...Andrea DeCapua
Immigrant students with limited formal schooling have assumptions and experiences that are very different from those of their teachers. Our instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) addresses the issues these students encounter by reducing cultural dissonance and transitioning them to formal schooling. We describe the implementation of MALP in community-based adult language and literacy programs and examine how this culturally responsive model encouraged participation, developed a sense of community, and reduced cultural dissonance.
Engaging Adult Learners with Limited or Interrupted Formal EducationAndrea DeCapua
An overview of our instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm, and the use of surveys with learners to build different ways of thinking
Navigating Unseen Navigating Unseen Cultural Dissonance for Students with L...Andrea DeCapua
As immigration to the U.S. continues to grow, more and more students with interrupted or limited formal education (SLIFE) enter secondary schools and adult education programs. These learners face major challenges, including the need to develop literacy skills and a content knowledge base, often in a limited timeframe. Beyond this, however, SLIFE come to formal education unfamiliar with classroom tasks and behaviors, and with little or no experience in expected types of learning and thinking. Dominant Western-style pedagogical practices derive from culturally- based priorities for learners and learning, priorities intrinsic to this style of schooling. Educators are often unaware how pervasive these priorities are and how much they shape pedagogical practices. I explore the priorities of both US mainstream educators and those of SLIFE, and discuss how each can accommodate the other’s priorities through a culturally responsive, mutually adaptive approach, thereby reducing the cultural dissonance SLIFE confront in formal educational settings. I conclude by considering how educators can bridge the gap to culturally new ways of learning by transitioning SLIFE from their preferred ways of learning to those deemed necessary for literacy and academic attainment in formal education.
Project-Based Learning for ELLs with Limited or Interrupted Formal EducationAndrea DeCapua
This document discusses project-based learning (PBL) for students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). It describes who SLIFE students are, noting they prefer oral communication and pragmatic learning. It also explains that PBL allows for differentiation, integrates literacy and content, and improves engagement. Specifically, PBL fosters community, provides relevance, and accommodates SLIFE students' preferred oral learning while also promoting school-based thinking. Examples of PBL projects include theme booklets created in steps where students plan, create visuals and text, and disseminate their work.
Meeting the needs of slife de capua sc 09 03-15 Andrea DeCapua
This document discusses meeting the needs of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). It notes that in 2012-2013, 9.2% of US public school students were English language learners (ELLs), estimated at 4.4 million students. In South Carolina in 2010-2011, ELL enrollment was over 36,000 students, accounting for 5.1% of the K-12 population. The document discusses SLIFE students' lack of formal education, low literacy, and missing content knowledge. It proposes an approach called the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm to help SLIFE students by combining familiar and unfamiliar learning processes and activities.
Meeting the needs of English Language learners with interruptions in their sc...Andrea DeCapua
This document summarizes Ranya Khan's comparative case study of two Intensive Newcomer Support classrooms in Manitoba that serve English language learners with interruptions in their formal schooling.
The study examines the classrooms from the perspectives of their envisioned design, enacted implementation, and experiences of participants. It finds that while both classrooms aim to support students' academic and socio-emotional needs, they differ in their approaches and level of integration within the school. The study provides insights into best practices for serving this student population and implications for how their needs can be met.
Flaitz The Nature of Schools and Schooling in the Developing WorldAndrea DeCapua
Part 1 of the TESOL 2012 Colloquium on Promoting Excellence: Perspectives on ELLs with Limited/Interrupted Schooling
Jeffra Flaitz discusses the importance of valuing the prior school experience and “school view” of learners whose education has been limited or interrupted to facilitate their transition to U.S. schools.
When Assumptions and Priorities Collide TESOL 2014 DeCapuaAndrea DeCapua
This presentation introduces the Intercultural Communication Framework as a means to address conflicts in cultural orientations to learning and teaching, resulting in cultural dissonance for struggling language learners. By applying the Framework’s three guidelines, educators can greatly improve their effectiveness in classroom communication and instructional delivery for this population.
Iowa caring about our kids through culturally responsive teaching Andrea DeCapua
English learners are a diverse group who enter our schools with a wide range of backgrounds and needs. Many of them readily develop the necessary language skills, are able to access grade-level subject area content knowledge, and progress satisfactorily in school. However, there are other English learners for whom school presents major challenges, who do not progress smoothly, and who are at high risk. This is especially true for students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). Like all English learners, SLIFE need to develop language proficiency; in addition, unlike other English learners, SLIFE must also develop literacy skills and master new school-based ways of thinking and learning. Because of their prior learning experiences, SLIFE do not share our assumptions about teaching and learning, and when they come to our classrooms they are confounded by the ways in which language and content are presented, practiced, and assessed. The key to helping this population is culturally responsive teaching, which asks educators to develop a new level of awareness of both their own and the students’ culturally derived learning priorities. I examine these different priorities and present a culturally responsive instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP®). This instructional model promotes academic achievement by helping SLIFE access the literacy practices and school-based ways of thinking of our schools while honoring and respecting their own learning paradigm as they transition to our classroom expectations and demands.
Tarone Research Agenda on Second Language Acquisition by Low Literate AdultsAndrea DeCapua
This document outlines a proposed research agenda for studying low-literate adult second language acquisition (SLA). It summarizes existing research showing that alphabetic literacy affects oral language processing. The agenda proposes studying (1) the metalinguistic awareness used by emergent readers in oral SLA, (2) the longitudinal development of low-literate learners' interlanguage, (3) the impact of corrective feedback on noticing different forms, and (4) how social context impacts cognitive processes in low-literate SLA. The goal is to better understand these learners and improve instructional practices.
Supporting Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education London Ontar...Andrea DeCapua
Workshop for teachers working with SLIFE (Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education) in Thames Valley and Waterloo School Districts, London Ontario
Reframing the Conversation: From Achievement Gap to Cultural Dissonance, NYSA...Helaine W. Marshall
Creating Fertile Spaces for multilingual, multicultural learners by implementing culturally responsive instruction using the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm®.
Making the Transition to Classroom Success: Culturally Responsive Teaching f...Andrea DeCapua
Participants develop requisite knowledge and skills for effective teaching of struggling adult language learners using a culturally responsive instructional model, MALP, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm. This model promotes classroom success for students having difficulties in traditionally structured programs. Using the principles of MALP, attendees examine samples of student work, guidelines and strategies, classroom activities, and the MALP Teacher Planning Checklist.
The document describes differences between the learning paradigms of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) and those expected in U.S. classrooms. It introduces the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) instructional model, which aims to address cultural dissonance by incorporating elements of SLIFE's communal and pragmatic learning approach as well as individual academic tasks emphasized in Western education. MALP combines aspects of both paradigms to ease SLIFE's transition to U.S. classrooms and support their academic achievement.
Connecting students with limited interrupted formal education (SLIFE) to US c...Andrea DeCapua
This document discusses strategies for teaching students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) in US classrooms. It introduces the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) approach, which focuses on making instruction immediately relevant, incorporating both shared and individual responsibilities, and using familiar language and content. Several hands-on activities are described that use this approach, such as collecting objects to build vocabulary and develop definitions through classification. Sentence frames are provided to scaffold academic tasks. Overall, the document provides research-based strategies for connecting SLIFE students to the classroom.
5-hour interactive institute on addressing the needs of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). Includes an exploration of participants’ assumptions about teaching and learning, and contrasting these with the expectations and assumptions of SLIFE. Examines how to build bridges for crossing the border to academic success by implementing a culturally responsive instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP), a tool designed to help teachers enable SLIFE to access the literacy practices and the academic ways of thinking and learning of formal education while honoring and respecting their learning paradigm.
This document provides an overview of strategies for developing a classical ESL model. It begins by defining common ESL acronyms and terms. It then discusses the components of sheltered instruction and strategies for building student comprehension, such as pre-teaching vocabulary, building background knowledge, and using graphic organizers. Examples of how to implement these strategies in different content areas are provided, such as using a Frayer model in science or mind maps in history. The roles and supports of the ESL team are described. Expectations and strategies for reading, writing, and available resources are also outlined.
SIOP Refresher: Meeting the Needs of our ELLS Carla Huck
This was our first PD of the school year, providing our teachers with the key principles of language instruction for ELLs and classroom implementation examples. Supplemental materials were also provided in a binder, such as a glossary of terms, GO-TO Strategies Matrix, differentiated techniques for ELLs, and one page handouts on various instructional strategies discussed.
This document discusses implications for teaching and learning through exploring second language acquisition and connecting theory to classroom practice. It provides an overview of key concepts in second language acquisition including Krashen's hypotheses, the difference between social and academic language proficiency, and the time required to achieve age-appropriate proficiency. The document also presents strategies for linking language to content such as building on students' prior knowledge and experiences, using interactive grouping configurations, and employing authentic assessment to inform instruction.
This document provides guidance for 21st century teaching and learning with digital media. Teachers are asked to complete three lesson plans and have students create three multimedia projects by the end of the school year. It encourages revisiting an Edmodo teacher group and planning standards-based lessons that engage students through essential questions. A list of instructional strategies is provided, along with goals to emphasize 21st century skills and higher-order thinking. Teachers are guided to begin project planning, build resources, and create rubrics to support student work.
Navigating Unseen Navigating Unseen Cultural Dissonance for Students with L...Andrea DeCapua
As immigration to the U.S. continues to grow, more and more students with interrupted or limited formal education (SLIFE) enter secondary schools and adult education programs. These learners face major challenges, including the need to develop literacy skills and a content knowledge base, often in a limited timeframe. Beyond this, however, SLIFE come to formal education unfamiliar with classroom tasks and behaviors, and with little or no experience in expected types of learning and thinking. Dominant Western-style pedagogical practices derive from culturally- based priorities for learners and learning, priorities intrinsic to this style of schooling. Educators are often unaware how pervasive these priorities are and how much they shape pedagogical practices. I explore the priorities of both US mainstream educators and those of SLIFE, and discuss how each can accommodate the other’s priorities through a culturally responsive, mutually adaptive approach, thereby reducing the cultural dissonance SLIFE confront in formal educational settings. I conclude by considering how educators can bridge the gap to culturally new ways of learning by transitioning SLIFE from their preferred ways of learning to those deemed necessary for literacy and academic attainment in formal education.
Project-Based Learning for ELLs with Limited or Interrupted Formal EducationAndrea DeCapua
This document discusses project-based learning (PBL) for students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). It describes who SLIFE students are, noting they prefer oral communication and pragmatic learning. It also explains that PBL allows for differentiation, integrates literacy and content, and improves engagement. Specifically, PBL fosters community, provides relevance, and accommodates SLIFE students' preferred oral learning while also promoting school-based thinking. Examples of PBL projects include theme booklets created in steps where students plan, create visuals and text, and disseminate their work.
Meeting the needs of slife de capua sc 09 03-15 Andrea DeCapua
This document discusses meeting the needs of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). It notes that in 2012-2013, 9.2% of US public school students were English language learners (ELLs), estimated at 4.4 million students. In South Carolina in 2010-2011, ELL enrollment was over 36,000 students, accounting for 5.1% of the K-12 population. The document discusses SLIFE students' lack of formal education, low literacy, and missing content knowledge. It proposes an approach called the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm to help SLIFE students by combining familiar and unfamiliar learning processes and activities.
Meeting the needs of English Language learners with interruptions in their sc...Andrea DeCapua
This document summarizes Ranya Khan's comparative case study of two Intensive Newcomer Support classrooms in Manitoba that serve English language learners with interruptions in their formal schooling.
The study examines the classrooms from the perspectives of their envisioned design, enacted implementation, and experiences of participants. It finds that while both classrooms aim to support students' academic and socio-emotional needs, they differ in their approaches and level of integration within the school. The study provides insights into best practices for serving this student population and implications for how their needs can be met.
Flaitz The Nature of Schools and Schooling in the Developing WorldAndrea DeCapua
Part 1 of the TESOL 2012 Colloquium on Promoting Excellence: Perspectives on ELLs with Limited/Interrupted Schooling
Jeffra Flaitz discusses the importance of valuing the prior school experience and “school view” of learners whose education has been limited or interrupted to facilitate their transition to U.S. schools.
When Assumptions and Priorities Collide TESOL 2014 DeCapuaAndrea DeCapua
This presentation introduces the Intercultural Communication Framework as a means to address conflicts in cultural orientations to learning and teaching, resulting in cultural dissonance for struggling language learners. By applying the Framework’s three guidelines, educators can greatly improve their effectiveness in classroom communication and instructional delivery for this population.
Iowa caring about our kids through culturally responsive teaching Andrea DeCapua
English learners are a diverse group who enter our schools with a wide range of backgrounds and needs. Many of them readily develop the necessary language skills, are able to access grade-level subject area content knowledge, and progress satisfactorily in school. However, there are other English learners for whom school presents major challenges, who do not progress smoothly, and who are at high risk. This is especially true for students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). Like all English learners, SLIFE need to develop language proficiency; in addition, unlike other English learners, SLIFE must also develop literacy skills and master new school-based ways of thinking and learning. Because of their prior learning experiences, SLIFE do not share our assumptions about teaching and learning, and when they come to our classrooms they are confounded by the ways in which language and content are presented, practiced, and assessed. The key to helping this population is culturally responsive teaching, which asks educators to develop a new level of awareness of both their own and the students’ culturally derived learning priorities. I examine these different priorities and present a culturally responsive instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP®). This instructional model promotes academic achievement by helping SLIFE access the literacy practices and school-based ways of thinking of our schools while honoring and respecting their own learning paradigm as they transition to our classroom expectations and demands.
Tarone Research Agenda on Second Language Acquisition by Low Literate AdultsAndrea DeCapua
This document outlines a proposed research agenda for studying low-literate adult second language acquisition (SLA). It summarizes existing research showing that alphabetic literacy affects oral language processing. The agenda proposes studying (1) the metalinguistic awareness used by emergent readers in oral SLA, (2) the longitudinal development of low-literate learners' interlanguage, (3) the impact of corrective feedback on noticing different forms, and (4) how social context impacts cognitive processes in low-literate SLA. The goal is to better understand these learners and improve instructional practices.
Supporting Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education London Ontar...Andrea DeCapua
Workshop for teachers working with SLIFE (Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education) in Thames Valley and Waterloo School Districts, London Ontario
Reframing the Conversation: From Achievement Gap to Cultural Dissonance, NYSA...Helaine W. Marshall
Creating Fertile Spaces for multilingual, multicultural learners by implementing culturally responsive instruction using the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm®.
Making the Transition to Classroom Success: Culturally Responsive Teaching f...Andrea DeCapua
Participants develop requisite knowledge and skills for effective teaching of struggling adult language learners using a culturally responsive instructional model, MALP, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm. This model promotes classroom success for students having difficulties in traditionally structured programs. Using the principles of MALP, attendees examine samples of student work, guidelines and strategies, classroom activities, and the MALP Teacher Planning Checklist.
The document describes differences between the learning paradigms of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) and those expected in U.S. classrooms. It introduces the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) instructional model, which aims to address cultural dissonance by incorporating elements of SLIFE's communal and pragmatic learning approach as well as individual academic tasks emphasized in Western education. MALP combines aspects of both paradigms to ease SLIFE's transition to U.S. classrooms and support their academic achievement.
Connecting students with limited interrupted formal education (SLIFE) to US c...Andrea DeCapua
This document discusses strategies for teaching students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) in US classrooms. It introduces the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) approach, which focuses on making instruction immediately relevant, incorporating both shared and individual responsibilities, and using familiar language and content. Several hands-on activities are described that use this approach, such as collecting objects to build vocabulary and develop definitions through classification. Sentence frames are provided to scaffold academic tasks. Overall, the document provides research-based strategies for connecting SLIFE students to the classroom.
5-hour interactive institute on addressing the needs of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). Includes an exploration of participants’ assumptions about teaching and learning, and contrasting these with the expectations and assumptions of SLIFE. Examines how to build bridges for crossing the border to academic success by implementing a culturally responsive instructional model, the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP), a tool designed to help teachers enable SLIFE to access the literacy practices and the academic ways of thinking and learning of formal education while honoring and respecting their learning paradigm.
This document provides an overview of strategies for developing a classical ESL model. It begins by defining common ESL acronyms and terms. It then discusses the components of sheltered instruction and strategies for building student comprehension, such as pre-teaching vocabulary, building background knowledge, and using graphic organizers. Examples of how to implement these strategies in different content areas are provided, such as using a Frayer model in science or mind maps in history. The roles and supports of the ESL team are described. Expectations and strategies for reading, writing, and available resources are also outlined.
SIOP Refresher: Meeting the Needs of our ELLS Carla Huck
This was our first PD of the school year, providing our teachers with the key principles of language instruction for ELLs and classroom implementation examples. Supplemental materials were also provided in a binder, such as a glossary of terms, GO-TO Strategies Matrix, differentiated techniques for ELLs, and one page handouts on various instructional strategies discussed.
This document discusses implications for teaching and learning through exploring second language acquisition and connecting theory to classroom practice. It provides an overview of key concepts in second language acquisition including Krashen's hypotheses, the difference between social and academic language proficiency, and the time required to achieve age-appropriate proficiency. The document also presents strategies for linking language to content such as building on students' prior knowledge and experiences, using interactive grouping configurations, and employing authentic assessment to inform instruction.
This document provides guidance for 21st century teaching and learning with digital media. Teachers are asked to complete three lesson plans and have students create three multimedia projects by the end of the school year. It encourages revisiting an Edmodo teacher group and planning standards-based lessons that engage students through essential questions. A list of instructional strategies is provided, along with goals to emphasize 21st century skills and higher-order thinking. Teachers are guided to begin project planning, build resources, and create rubrics to support student work.
Mastering American e-Learning by Valeri Chukhlomin, Bidhan Chandra and Anant ...Valeri Chukhlomin
This document summarizes the iMOOC project, which aims to help international students and professionals successfully navigate U.S. online learning environments. It outlines competencies needed across areas like technology, language, culture, academics, and professional skills. An online course was piloted with over 4,600 students from 141 countries to help learners assess their competency gaps and develop strategies to overcome barriers. The goal is to create a multi-user online platform integrating MOOCs, partner universities, and credit-bearing courses to better support international students and professionals studying and working remotely in the U.S.
The document discusses the promises of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) for meeting the needs of diverse students in today's digital world. UDL is an educational framework based on brain research that provides multiple means of representation, expression and engagement to accommodate individual learner differences. The document advocates applying UDL principles through flexible curricula that utilize various materials, technologies and instructional strategies to meet the needs of all students.
The document discusses teaching approaches and argues that teaching is fundamentally simple, involving recapping previous material, providing new input through clear explanations, allowing students to apply the new knowledge, and testing understanding. It acknowledges that executing these steps well is complex and discusses how teaching has become overcomplicated. The author advocates teaching "like nobody's watching" with confidence based on solid foundations and mastery of content.
TESOL presentation on the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm® - culturally responsive teaching model that can be infused into ANY curriculum. Mantra is: "Create Fertile Spaces" - Marshall 2015
This document provides information about students with inconsistent or interrupted formal education (SIFE). It defines SIFE as English language learners who have been in the US for less than 12 months and function at least 2 years below grade level in their first language. It also discusses layers of instructional context including curriculum, instruction, assessment and culturally responsive teaching. Additionally, it provides data on the number of unaccompanied children released to sponsors in different states from 2013 to 2015.
The document discusses making curriculum accessible for all students. It emphasizes that students learn differently and teachers must accommodate diverse learners. The rise of technology and higher standards requires new approaches like Universal Design for Learning, which creates flexible lessons that provide multiple means of engagement, representation, and action/expression based on brain research and principles of inclusive instructional design. UDL aims to reduce barriers in curriculum and provide appropriate support and challenge for all students.
This document outlines a 10-day unit plan for 5th grade students to learn about the Native Americans of the Pacific Northwest through using QR codes and smartphones. Students will be placed into groups to use QR codes to research how geography and climate influenced aspects of the culture like housing, food sources, and tools. They will then create a PowerPoint presentation to present their findings to the class. The teacher provides accommodations for different types of students and identifies standards. Formative and summative assessments are outlined to check student understanding throughout the project.
1) SAS Curriculum Pathways is an online collection of over 1,200 interactive resources aligned to the Common Core standards for middle and high school students.
2) Resources include interactive tools, audio tutorials, web lessons, and inquiries that engage students and teach 21st century skills.
3) Teachers can search resources by Common Core standard, subject, category, type, and level to integrate them into their lesson plans.
Similar to Toronto june 12 2015 de capua reaching slife (20)
This document discusses strategies for meeting the needs of students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). It begins by explaining the challenges SLIFE face in adapting to US classrooms, such as developing literacy skills and learning academic ways of thinking. It then introduces the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP), an approach that accepts SLIFE's learning conditions, combines their processes with US classroom expectations, and focuses activities on using familiar language and content. The document provides examples of projects teachers can implement using MALP, which incorporate things like timelines and surveys. It emphasizes keeping projects simple, structured, and immediately relevant to students' lives.
supporting online learning for struggling els and slifeAndrea DeCapua
What can you do to help your struggling ELs and SLIFE, especially those with little or no access to technology during this pandemic and looking to the future?
Students with Limited/Interrupted Formal Education (SLIFE)Andrea DeCapua
Lecture at the University of Cologne, Germany - Discussion of the dissonance between the learning paradigm of students with limited/interrupted formal education and the learning paradigm of formal education; overview of how to address the needs of SLIFE through the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP).
Challenging the Deficit View of English Learners with Limited or Interrupted ...Andrea DeCapua
Given the challenges SLIFE encounter when they enter U.S. schools, a deficit view frequently pervades educators’ attitudes toward SLIFE because their assets are almost always invisible when viewed through the lens of formal education. This lens identifies and labels SLIFE based on what they don’t have: no or low language proficiency, no or low literacy skills, significant gaps in subject-area knowledge, and not knowing how to “do school”. However, it is not the students who are the “problem,” but rather the structure and constructs of formal education. After examining who SLIFE are, I briefly outline a culturally responsive instructional model that provides a ramp for SLIFE to formal education. This model promotes academic achievement by helping these students access the literacy practices and academic ways of thinking of Western-style formal education while honoring and respecting their language(s), existing skills, knowledge, and lived experiences to avoid the alienation, disenchantment, and failure SLIFE too often experience. By focusing on assets and by building bridges, SLIFE are granted a voice otherwise silenced in institutionalized educational practices that all too often paint them as intellectually inferior.
DeCapua Practitioners and Researchers: Learning Together aaal 2016Andrea DeCapua
I describe a successful ongoing partnership between ESL researchers and practitioners. This partnership has allowed the researchers to follow closely the implementation of a culturally responsive instructional model. The partnership has also promoted the growth and development of the practitioners’ expertise and professionalism.
DeCapua keynote Building Bridges to Academic Success through Culturally Respo...Andrea DeCapua
Keynote at the MELEd conference Minnesota November 2015 discussing how to best understand and meet the needs of struggling English learners in our schools
Culturally Responsive Teaching Restad Wweden oct 16 2015 Andrea DeCapua
This document discusses culturally responsive teaching for students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). It defines SLIFE students and contrasts them with non-SLIFE learners. SLIFE students often have gaps in their education due to factors like limited schooling, low literacy, and unfamiliarity with Western academic expectations. The document outlines SLIFE students' needs and the cultural differences between their learning experiences and formal Western education. It proposes using a Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm instructional model to help SLIFE students transition successfully to school in a new cultural context.
Reaching Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education Through Cultur...Andrea DeCapua
This document summarizes a presentation on teaching students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE). It discusses key differences between SLIFEs' backgrounds and a typical U.S. education, including their emphasis on oral transmission versus literacy. It also introduces the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP) approach, which accepts SLIFEs' cultural learning conditions while combining processes and focusing activities on new academic tasks made accessible through familiar content. MALP provides a culturally responsive alternative to deficit views of SLIFEs' ways of learning.
Bridging the gap: connecting SLIFE with U.S. classrooms DeCapuaAndrea DeCapua
This document summarizes a presentation about supporting students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) in U.S. classrooms. It discusses how SLIFE come from educational backgrounds and cultures that differ significantly from typical U.S. schooling. The presentation explores integrating aspects of SLIFE's preferred learning paradigms into classroom instruction through a culturally responsive approach called the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm. This transitional approach aims to help SLIFE adapt to U.S. academic expectations by addressing the cultural dissonance they experience. Examples provided include using project-based learning and creating welcome booklets to make content immediately relevant while developing literacy and academic skills.
Implementing Culturally Responsive Instruction in the LESLLA ClassroomAndrea DeCapua
This demonstration guidesd teachers through the process of designing and delivering instruction to LESLLA learners based on Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) with the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm (MALP).
Do High School English Learners’ Previous Formal Schooling Backgrounds Affect...Andrea DeCapua
Presentation by C Browder at the Colloquium "Understanding Language Learning Among Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education (SLIFE )." AAAL 2014 Convention, Portland, OR
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
1. malpeduca)on.com
Reaching
Students
with
Limited
or
Interrupted
Formal
Educa)on
(SLIFE)
Andrea
DeCapua,
Ed.D.
Educa)onal
Consultant,
MALP,
LLC
Long
Island
University
–
Mid-‐Hudson
2.
3. Ways of thinking and lear2ing
are shaped by
prior lear2ing ex6eriences
4. malpeduca)on.com
ELLs
SLIFE
• Consistent
grade-‐level
formal
educa)on
• Age-‐appropriate
L1
literacy
skills
• Grade-‐level
content
knowledge
for
most
part
• Iden)ty
as
learner
and
how
to
“do”
school
• No,
interrupted,
or
limited
formal
educa)on
• No
/
low
literacy
skills
• Lack
content-‐knowledge
of
their
grade-‐level
peers
across
subjects
• Unfamiliar
with
“doing”
school
8. malpeduca)on.com
Needs
of
SLIFE
• Develop
basic
literacy
skills
• Learn
basic
and
grade-‐level
subject
area
concepts
Ø Adapt
to
cultural
differences
in
learning
and
teaching
Ø Acquire
academic
ways
of
thinking
9. malpeduca)on.com
Intercultural
Communica)on
Framework
(ICF)
o Establish
and
maintain
a
rela)onship
o Iden)fy
priori)es
in
both
cultures
o Make
associa)ons
between
the
strange
and
the
familiar
16. malpeduca)on.com
➨ The batsmen were merciless against
the bowlers. The bowlers placed their
men in slips and covers. But to no
avail. The batsmen hit one four after
another with an occasional six. Not
once did a ball look like it would hit
their stumps or be caught.
Version #1
17. malpeduca)on.com
Content
Schema
Version #1
➨ The batsmen were merciless
against the bowlers. The bowlers
placed their men in slips and
covers. But to no avail. The
batsmen hit one four after another
with an occasional six. Not once
did a ball look like it would hit their
stumps or be caught.
18. malpeduca)on.com
Content
Schema
➨ The men were at bat against the
bowlers. They did not show any pity.
The bowlers placed their men in
slips. They placed their men in
covers. They hit some sixes. No ball
hit the stumps. No ball was caught.
Version #2
Tierney
&
Pearson,
1985
21. malpeduca)on.com
The
Power
of
Prior
Knowledge
When information is missing or
confusing, we compensate by
accessing our familiar schemata.
Observe the following:
23. malpeduca)on.com
Compensa)ng
Strategies
Example
#2
Our
Father
makes
art
in
heaven
Howdja
know
my
name?
Thy
kingdom
come,
Thy
Wimbledon,
On
earth
as
it
is
in
Heaven.
Give
us
this
steak
and
jelly
bread,
And
forgive
us
our
trash
baskets
As
we
forgive
those
who
put
trash
in
our
baskets.
And
lead
a
snot
into
Kemp's
sta)on,
But
deliver
us
from
eagles,
For
mine
is
the
kingdom,
the
flower,
and
the
jewelry.
25. malpeduca)on.com
Two Learning Activities
FAMILIAR
SCHEMATA
UNFAMILIAR
SCHEMATA
Describing
your favorite
game in your
first language
or dialect
Writing a
science lab
report in
academic
English
26. malpeduca)on.com
Balance
Familiar
and
Unfamiliar
Schemata
in
Ac)vi)es
• If
tasks
are
new,
use
L1
or
highly
contextualized
everyday
English
• If
content
is
new,
use
L1
or
highly
contextualized
everyday
English
• If
focus
is
language,
concepts
and
tasks
should
be
familiar
and
easily
accessible
to
learner
27. malpeduca)on.com
Teachers
and
learners
assume
that
1.
The
goals
of
instruc)on
are
to
a)
produce
an
independent
learner
b)
prepare
the
learner
for
the
future
DeCapua
&
Marshall,
2011,
Breaking
New
Ground;
Marshall
&
DeCapua,
2013,
Making
the
Transi5on
to
Classroom
Success
2.
The
learner
is
ready
to
a)
par)cipate
and
demonstrate
mastery
on
an
individual
basis
b)
engage
in
literacy-‐based,
classroom
tasks
28. malpeduca)on.com
• Oral
transmission
vs.
wri`en
word
• Collec)vism
vs.
individualism
• Informal
ways
of
learning
vs.
formal
educa)on
Three
Underlying
Cultural
Differences
33. malpeduca)on.com
Teachers
and
learners
assume
that
1.
The
goals
of
instruc)on
are
to
a)
produce
an
independent
learner
b)
prepare
the
learner
for
the
future
DeCapua
&
Marshall,
2011,
Breaking
New
Ground;
Marshall
&
DeCapua,
2013,
Making
the
Transi5on
to
Classroom
Success
2.
The
learner
is
ready
to
a)
par)cipate
and
demonstrate
mastery
on
an
individual
basis
b)
engage
in
literacy-‐based,
classroom
tasks
38. malpeduca)on.com
Mutually
Adap)ve
Learning
Paradigm®
MALP®
ü Instruc)onal
Model
ü Elements
from
students’
learning
paradigm
ü Elements
from
North
American
learning
paradigm
ü Transi)onal
approach
to
close
achievement
gap
39. Mutually
Adap)ve
Learning
Paradigm
–
MALP®
Culturally
Responsive
Teaching
Model
SLIFE
Formal
Educa)on
Interconnectedness
Independence
Shared
Responsibility
Individual
Accountability
PragmaKc
Tasks
Academic
Tasks
ACCEPT
CONDITIONS
COMBINE
PROCESSES
FOCUS
on
NEW
ACTIVITIES
with
familiar
language
&
content
Immediate
Relevance
Oral
Transmission
WriUen
Word
with
Future
Relevance
(DeCapua
&
Marshall,
2009,
2011;
Marshall,
1994;
Marshall
&
DeCapua,
2013)
41. Ac)vity:
Using
the
MALP
Checklist
A
SLIFE
science
class
is
learning
to
classify
living
vs.
nonliving
things.
Ms.
Vargas
reviews
her
earlier
lesson
by
projec)ng
a
picture
of
a
jungle
environment.
She
asks
students
to
point
to
items
they
recognize
and
circles
one
of
those
items,
a
bamboo
tree,
and
writes
next
to
it
“living”
with
a
colored
marker.
Mrs.
Vargas
then
has
students
come
to
the
board
and
circle
other
examples
of
living
things,
using
the
same
color
marker.
Next,
she
asks
students
to
iden)fy
nonliving
things
on
the
projected
pictures.
Ms.
Vargas
chooses
one
item,
circles
it
with
a
different
color
maker
and
labels
it
“nonliving.”
She
has
students
come
up
and
circle
non-‐living
items,
using
the
different
colored
marker.
On
the
wall
are
student-‐created
posters
on
living
and
nonliving
things.
On
the
living
things
poster
is
a
list
of
defining
characteris)cs,
which
Ms.
Vargas
oaen
refers
to,
reminding
the
students
to
think
about
each
characteris)c
when
they
decide
whether
an
item
is
living
or
nonliving.
When
one
student
becomes
confused
and
iden)fies
a
rock
as
living,
another
student
points
to
the
poster
and
says,
“No,
rocks
no
breath.”
Later,
Ms.
Vargas
projects
a
picture
of
a
pond
and
passes
out
copies
of
this
picture
and
colored
markers
to
the
class.
She
asks
the
students
to
iden)fy
the
different
items
in
the
picture,
using
one
color
for
living
and
another
color
for
nonliving.
The
students
work
together
to
label
items,
referring
to
the
student
posters.
When
they
are
done,
Ms.
Vargas
instructs
the
students,
“Each
person
choose
one
item
and
say
whether
it
is
a
living
or
nonliving
thing.”
Tell
your
partner
at
least
one
reason
why
it
is
living
or
nonliving.”
Aaer
they
finish,
Ms.
Vargas
announces
a
test
the
next
with
a
different
picture.
They
will
have
to
find
and
label
each
item
as
living
or
nonliving,
and
name
the
characteris)cs
of
living
things
without
reference
to
the
concept
poster.
42. malpeduca)on.com
North
American
Mainstream
Formal
Educa)on
Informal
Ways
of
Learning
Oral
Transmission
Collec)vism
Deficit
View
they
know
what
to
do
but
lack
ability
Dissonance
View
they
are
starKng
from
a
different
paradigm
Ways
of
Learning
Con)nuum
44. malpeduca)on.com
More
about
MALP®
?
Email:
drandreadecapua@gmail.com
Website:
h`p://malpeduca)on.com
Books:
DeCapua,
A.
&
Marshall,
H.W.
(2011).
Breaking
new
ground:
Teaching
students
with
limited
or
interrupted
formal
educa5on
in
U.
S.
secondary
schools.
University
of
Michigan
Press.
Marshall,
H.W.
&
DeCapua,
A.
(2013).
Making
the
transi4on
to
classroom
success:
Culturally
responsive
teaching
for
struggling
language
learners
(2013).
University
of
Michigan
Press.