Topic HIVfour secondary source needed8 pagesMLA format.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•2 views

Topic: HIV four secondary source needed 8 pages MLA format 12-point Times New Roman font, work cited! Objectives: Analyze primary sources and the messages they convey in written, visual, and/or audio media Explore and make claims about how the messages are conveyed Discuss to whom the messages are conveyed and speculate about the effectiveness of this message for a specific audience Develop a complex thesis that makes a claim about how a primary source communicates a message to a specific audience Introduce complicating evidence and include what The Writer’s Companion terms an “evolving thesis” Demonstrate awareness about your role in the conversation about your research question and thesis by acknowledging what is at stake in your analysis. In other words, explain why your analysis matters Integrate secondary sources in a way that accounts for aspects of the academic conversation that are relevant to the paper’s thesis Include a title on the first page that reflects the complexity of the paper’s general purposes Include proper in-text citations of each source consulted or referred to, including the primary source which you’re analyzing, and an appropriately formatted Works Cited page following MLA guidelines Observe the standards of academic writing discussed in class and avoid sentence-level errors and lapses in tone. Produce fluid and precise prose with appropriate transitions throughout ...

is at stake in your analysis. In other words, explain why your
analysis matters
Integrate secondary sources in a way that accounts for aspects
of the academic conversation that are relevant to the paper’s
thesis
Include a title on the first page that reflects the complexity of
the paper’s general purposes
Include proper in-text citations of
each
source consulted or referred to, including the primary source
which you’re analyzing, and an appropriately formatted Works
Cited page following MLA guidelines
Observe the standards of academic writing discussed in class
and avoid sentence-level errors and lapses in tone. Produce
fluid and precise prose with appropriate transitions throughout

ENG 111 Writing and Inquiry Public Piece Project Background Throughout this course, we have been examining how audiences are persuaded by various styles, rhetorical appeals, and ways of presenting information based on their specific needs and expectations. For this final major component of the semester, you will be taking the argument of your research paper and restructuring in a creative and purposeful way for a new audience. How to Approach the Assignment 1. Audience. Consider your research paper argument. Who would benefit from knowing the information you learned in your research? Choose a new audience for your focus. 2. Purpose. Once you have your audience in mind, what purpose do you have in connecting with them? What information from your research do you want them to know and what would you encourage them to do with it? 3. Genre. Choose a medium for presenting your research argument to your audience. How you choose to restructure your argument is a vital part of this assignment. Make sure the genre you choose has value and purpose for the audience. Possible public pieces include: brochure, public service announcement, commercial, magazine article, newspaper editorial, letter, podcast, original poetry/music, video, poster presentation, etc. Creativity is encouraged as long as it thoughtfully conveys your argument! Note: PowerPoint presentations are not allowed, because they are evil. 4. Create. Compose/create a high quality, professional product. Any scripts, transcripts, or other written components should accompany the actual product. Documents, videos, and images will be uploaded to Blackboard. 5. Presentation. Near the end of the course, you will present your argument to the class, briefly. You will need to discuss what your argument is, the audience you chose, and how your public piece connects effectively with the audience. You may choose to present your actual piece as if the class is your intended audience. Grading Criteria Your public piece will be graded based on how well you do the following: · Demonstrate that the audience is appropriate for the topic/argument · Demonstrate that the medium of the public piece is effective for your audience · Connect your public piece content to your research paper argument · Create a professional, appealing product · Present your ideas in an engaging and articulate manner ENG 111 Writing and Inquiry Rhetorical Analysis Essay For this assignment, you will craft an essay that analyzes and evaluates two news articles that discuss the same topic from two different perspectives. For instance, think of a current issue and find an article that focuses on the pros of this issue and one that focuses on the cons of this issue. Your essay will examine the rhetorical context (author, audience, topic, purpose) as well as the strategies used to convey its message (diction, tone, evidence, imagery, and rhetorical appeals: logos, ethos, and pathos). Since you are comparing two arguments, yo.

Proposal EssayThis assignment has three interrelated goals1. To.docx

simonlbentley59018

Proposal Essay This assignment has three interrelated goals: 1. To help you develop the necessary skills to create a class A proposal, considering context, research questions, sources, timeline, and larger implications. 1. To give you practice working with the Research Proposal as an academic genre. 1. To provide an opportunity for working on stylistics and effective academic discourse. FORMAT: Your essay should be at least FIVE FULL PAGES and in MLA FORMAT. Please include page numbers, a heading, in-text citations and a properly labeled and formatted works cited. You may use images in your draft if you wish – just please use them rhetorically, not decoratively. In addition, be sure to cite any credible sources (textual or image-based) that you include in your draft and to include a bibliography/works cited at the end that includes a minimum of five sources. These sources must come from the Dallas College database or Dallas College library. If not, there should be a reason why. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND STRUCTURE Your proposal should have a well thought out title and contain effective visual rhetoric as appropriate. It should be a traditional, linear Word document in MLA format. Make sure you are hitting the following parts within your essay (do not include subheadings. They are not needed): Introduction. This introduction should be designed to interest your reader in your topic and proposal and provide some historical/cultural context for your project. At the end of your introduction, include a tentative thesis to indicate to your reader that you are entering your project looking at your topic through a critical, analytic lens -- this thesis can state your intentions, but it SHOULD NOT BE IN FIRST PERSON. A good formula for an introduction is context + problem/complication + proposed argument or research question. Each stage in this formula should be a few sentences long. Body In your body paragraphs, make sure that you are addressing the problem and its solution. MORE SOLUTION THAN PROBLEM should be in this essay. What are you proposing? What are you offering to the world? Conclusion. In your conclusion, address the "So What?" of this research. That is, why does what you are investigating matter as more than an academic exercise? Why should your audience want to read it? Why does it matter? Works cited When you cite sources, you'll also need to have a works cited at the end of the proposal, with the citations in MLA format. Any parenthetical citations in the text itself should also follow MLA guidelines. You can find more help on in-text citations and works cited format through the Dallas College website or Purdue OWL. EVALUATION CRITERIA At a minimum, there needs to be some content for each of the sections listed above. Students who submit drafts that represent very little effort and are pronouncedly incomplete will receive a ½ grade (i.e., A- to .

Literature Review.ppt

HadiTak1

The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It outlines that a literature review critically evaluates prior research relevant to the topic. It should identify what is already known about the research problem and can point out effective and ineffective research strategies. The review should be focused on studies closely related to the research problem. Both qualitative and quantitative researchers may construct literature reviews, but qualitative researchers are more likely to do so after starting their study. The document provides tips for searching literature, evaluating sources, summarizing information, organizing the review, and writing it in an effective manner.

Biography window

henryccjr

This document outlines the requirements and expectations for a biography research report and oral presentation assignment in a high school biography unit. Students will research a person of their choosing, write a 4-6 page essay about that person, and present their findings to the class. The essay must integrate research from multiple credible sources while avoiding plagiarism. Students will learn skills like developing a thesis, organizing research, citing sources, and revising their work. The unit is designed to help students meet various California state standards related to research, writing, and oral presentation skills.

writing_chpt2_Litreviewhshahshslolmaowowo

hackerampotagagokaba

The document provides guidance on writing a literature review for a doctoral dissertation. It defines a literature review as an exhaustive examination of literature sources, especially methods and findings, consulted to understand the research problem. The purpose is to justify the need for the research, show how it adds to existing research, and explain methodological choices. Components include discussing the theoretical framework, synthesizing research findings, and reviewing strengths and weaknesses of prior studies. Sources should be recent, peer-reviewed journal articles or conference papers obtained through the university library. The literature review should comprise at least 25-30 pages including 30 or more references.

The Persuasive Argument Paper is an integrative assignment that.docx

write5

The document provides instructions for completing Persuasive Argument Paper #2, an integrative assignment for a gender studies course. Students must write a 3-5 page paper using APA style that persuasively argues a position on a topic related to concepts from the course. The paper must apply knowledge from the course to shape the student's opinion, support that position with evidence from scholarly sources, and communicate the argument in a way aimed at persuading others. Detailed guidelines are provided on selecting a topic, developing an argument, incorporating sources, following APA style formatting, and being evaluated based on accuracy, clarity, depth, originality, use of evidence, and writing mechanics.

The Research Project will present research relating the responsibili.docx

lourapoupheq

The Research Project will present research relating the responsibilities of a critical thinker to contemporary society. In this assignment, you will do the following: Research A NOREXIA AMONGST FEMALE DISTANCE RUNNERS Define the problem. Propose a possible solution for the problem. Create an argument that supports your thesis position. You should take on the perspective of a critically thinking researcher. The argument must present a thesis statement and evidence to support the thesis statement. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from the position you take on the issue and explain how those outcomes would influence society and culture. Interpret statistical data from at least two peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Evaluate evidence using the following standards: validity, reliability, and bias related to the chosen topic and accurately identify strengths and weaknesses. Your Argument You must present a complete argument, including a major claim with at least five points of evidence, information, or data that will prove the claim. The thesis statement must be A clear, simple declarative sentence as the first or last sentence in the opening paragraph of the essay. Of such a nature that it can be substantiated, corroborated, verified, and proved through appeal to primary or secondary academic research source materials. The introductory paragraph must Present the thesis statement, an explanation for the importance of the topic, and its relation to the student’s field of study. Beliefs, opinions, and personal opinions must not be introduced at any point in the essay. All beliefs and opinions should be supported with academic evidence. Sweeping generalizations with no supporting academic evidence do not reflect adequate critical thinking skills. Do not include rhetorical questions in your essays. All the questions that are pertinent to your project need to be answered in your essay and your answers again need to be supported with evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles and academically published books. Attributes of Good Critical Thinking in Papers Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue. The evidence that you use should come from high-level researchers engaged in your field of study. Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly. Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue. Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research. Final Project Requirements The Final Project may be presented as a formal research paper (essay format) or a PowerPoint presentation, equivalent to a minimum of 10 – 12 pages in APA format (approximately 3,300 – 3,900 typewritten words, excluding title page and refer.

Psy 492 Massive Success / snaptutorial.com

Reynolds37

This document outlines the requirements and grading rubric for an ENC 1102 exploratory research narrative assignment at Florida International University. Students must write a narrative of at least 750 words recounting their research process, including developing a research question and conducting primary research through interviews or surveys. The narrative will tell the story of the student's learning experience as they explore their topic from different perspectives by synthesizing various sources. The goal is for students to thoughtfully consider their issue from multiple angles before developing their own opinion.

TopicReports are used to describe research findings, analyze th.docx

nanamonkton

Topic: Reports are used to describe research findings, analyze those findings, and make recommendations. When writing a report, writers need to do more than present the facts. Writers also need to interpret their results and help readers understand the information they have collected. Research reports are designed to describe research methods, analyze findings, and make recommendations. Directions: For this assignment, write a 4-5 page Research Report in which you explore a controversial, still evolving topic related to digital citizenship or using technology/ the internet (see list below). The following SIX sections should be included in your Research Report along with the Works Cited page : Executive summary or abstract : summarizes the major sections of the report. Introduction: defines a research question or problem and explains why it is important to the reader. The introduction clearly states the purpose and main point of the report, and provides background information on the topic. Methods: describes how the research was carried out. Explain your methods step by step in a way that would allow your readers to replicate your research. Each major step will usually receive at least one paragraph of coverage. Explain how you did each step and why you did it that way. Results/Findings: presents the resul ts of the research objectively. Choose at least four of the most important findings/results from your research and describe what you found. Discussion: analyzes the results and explains what they mean. Show how your results answer your research question. Sometimes this section can be merged with the previous section of Results/Findings. Conclusion/Recommendations: restates the main point of the report and offers specific recommendations. Your goal is to leave your readers with a clear sense of what you discovered and what should be done about it. Works Cited/Appendices : Provide bibliographic information for any sources you have cited in MLA format. Include any other m aterials you collected or created such as surveys, questionnaires, perhaps charts, graphs, or other documents that your reader might find useful. A Note on Sources: You should present findings from meaningful sources, not useless or outdated material (l imit yo ur research to essays published in the last 5 years , and bo oks published within the last 10 years ). You must find one book, one article from a journal, and one (reputable website). The other two types of sources are up to you. Useful databases to search include the EBSCOHost , JStor, Academic Search Premier, and the Philosopher’s Index. The books should be useful in finding proper history, facts, quotes, and/or unfamiliar material to the general public. Audience: Your audience is an academic interested in understanding more about what is being sa id and written your topic. You are making yourself the expert on this topic so you should address your audience like you ar.

Required ResourcesMultimediaCendejas, M. (2015). Scholarly and.docx

sodhi3

The document provides resources for researching scholarly and popular sources, including three videos and descriptions of each. The first video describes the differences between popular and scholarly sources and tips for searching databases. The second video also discusses popular, scholarly and trade sources and database searching. The third animated video contrasts appropriate research using scholarly sources versus simply searching online. The document also includes sections on annotated bibliographies and describing scholarly, peer reviewed and credible sources.

Topic - RRL.pdf

JohnLagman3

10. review-of-related-literature (1)

JamesRaid

The document discusses the review of related literature (RRL) process. It defines an RRL and explains that it evaluates information from sources related to the selected research area. The purposes of an RRL include obtaining background knowledge, relating the study to current situations, and expanding on prior research. The document outlines including background information, theories, data, findings and recommendations in an RRL. It also discusses primary, secondary and tertiary sources and citing sources to avoid plagiarism.

Academic Writing & Essay Tips

Kemal Brown

Eng 102H Annotated Bibliography Assignment

Victoria Arthur

This document provides instructions for an annotated bibliography assignment for an English 102H college writing course. Students are asked to identify at least eight sources on their research topic that represent different perspectives. For each source, students must provide an MLA citation followed by a commentary summarizing the source, describing its rhetorical context and intended audience, and evaluating its strengths, weaknesses, and usefulness for the assignment. The annotated bibliography will help students become familiar with secondary research on their topic before writing a critical paper. It will be graded based on the relevance, comprehensiveness, quality, and format of the source annotations.

Week 5 engl. 145 sep 21 st and 23rd

lisyaseloni

The document provides guidance on writing an annotated bibliography and literature review. It discusses challenges students may face in these assignments and how to evaluate sources. Students are instructed to get into groups and discuss a research article by addressing its main components, research questions, methodology, and findings. The document also provides tips on using quotations, paraphrasing, and summarizing sources in a literature review. It outlines the key components and sections a literature review should include such as introducing the topic, summarizing studies and articles, and concluding by addressing gaps in research.

Eng102 r4 appendix_h

Chris Williams

The document discusses guidelines for appropriate style, academic honesty, and APA formatting for university writing assignments. It explains that universities require a standardized format to consistently evaluate writing. The APA style is used, with specifics on formatting papers, citing sources with in-text citations and reference lists, and creating annotated bibliographies. Students are advised to carefully cite sources to avoid plagiarism and show credibility as researchers.

Select a topic to research. For your research, you must use Google.docx

bagotjesusa

Select a topic to research. For your research, you must use Google Scholar or another reputable site. Use Lecture 2 for a description of what is considered a scholarly article. Use APA formatting style for references. Create a title page and a reference list with 10 references from the last 5 years. Include the permalink for each reference. Include the following types of references: 1. Book 2. Journal articles 3. Website 4. Dissertation/thesis from a database 5. Streaming video 6. Book chapter Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. LECTURE 2 Introduction Learning to communicate appropriately and effectively in a variety of settings and in a variety of formats is an important skill in both academic and professional environments. In an online learning environment, learning to communicate effectively through writing is particularly important because it is, by far, how the majority of communication occurs. Review the learning objectives for this module within the course syllabus and use the following lecture, which is about various forms of written communication used in the online graduate setting, to accomplish them. Paraphrasing Paraphrasing the ideas of others is a requirement in academic writing and graduate study. Paraphrasing is using your own words to restate ideas or information from a source material. Paraphrasing will help you grasp the full meaning of the source material and allow you to appropriately reference the source material to support your own ideas and academic writing. Paraphrased material is usually shorter and more concise than the original information. The following are some common guidelines taken from the Purdue Online Writing Lab (2012), which may assist you with learning to paraphrase information gathered from reading materials for use in completing your coursework.  Reread the original passage until you understand its full meaning.  Set the original passage aside and, on a note card, write what you think the passage means in your own words (paraphrase).  Jot down a few words below your paraphrase to remind you later of how you plan to use the information. At the top of the note card, write a key word or phrase to indicate the subject of your paraphrase.  Compare your paraphrase with the original to make sure that your version accurately expresses all the essential information.  Use quotation marks to identify any unique term or phrase you copied exactly from the original source.  Record the source (including the page) on your note card so that you can cite it easily if you decide to incorporate the material into a paper or discussion question response. The following is an example of paraphrasing (Purdue OWL, 2012), which i.

Parts of Research paper

pradeep ramtel

This document outlines the typical parts of a research paper, including the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. The title should predict the paper's content and contain keywords. The abstract summarizes the entire paper to help readers decide if they want to read it. The introduction provides background information and states the paper's objectives. The methods section describes how data was collected and analyzed. The results section explains the findings, while the discussion section interprets the results and discusses limitations. Finally, the references list all sources cited in the paper.

Argument Essay AssignmentAssignment DescriptionFor this .docx

jewisonantone

Argument Essay Assignment Assignment Description For this essay, you should choose a topic from the Gale resource on Opposing Viewpoints (see below) and write a 4-5 page essay that argues a clearly defined position about that topic. The essay should have an introduction that has a clear thesis statement and demonstrates the relevance of your topic, several body paragraphs that each make focused claims, and a conclusion. In upper level courses, you will often be asked to demonstrate your ability to converse with other scholars in your field. Your job is to change the reader’s mind about a particular subject and persuade the reader into believing your argument. Your paper must be written so that it is accessible to readers from a different perspective. In other words, be fair and unbiased when acknowledging what others say about your topic, but then prove why they are wrong using logical reasons and credible evidence. In this essay, you must synthesize various sources while persuading the reader to accept your viewpoint. You do not want to simply report what others are saying, but engage in a dialogue with them. Purpose and Learning Objectives The purpose of this assignment is to practice persuasive writing and synthesis of sources. You will increase your critical thinking skills by analyzing yours and others’ assumptions, evaluating multiple perspectives, and developing a clear position. Writing, research, and eloquent written expression are vital for a successful future. You will express all of these skills in this assignment. This essay will be used as the English department assessment for the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board’s mandated core curriculum assessment of Student Learning Outcomes (SLO). This essay will address the SLO objectives of critical thinking and written communication. Your research paper should demonstrate the following learning objectives: Awareness of the audience to whom you are speaking Awareness of the purpose of your argument Ability to enter into a scholarly conversation Ability to write a qualified and narrow argumentative thesis statement Ability to synthesize information from various sources Ability to craft an argument with different types of relevant, credible, and detailed support Ability to research and identify academic sources Ability to summarize, paraphrase, and quote while citing correctly in MLA to avoid plagiarism Ability to converse in standard, academic English Minimum Requirements 1,200-1,500 word essay (4-5 pages) An interesting and informative title A clearly stated thesis in the introduction that articulates your position and what you want to argue in your paper. Logical and clear reasons supporting your argument A document formatted in correct MLA format 5 sources (peer-reviewed journals, books, and reliable web sources) One of your sources must disagree with your argument and be used to create a counterargument. A counterargument occurs when you show wh.

2.3. seminar,conference.research paper writing.pptx

Prince500060

This document provides information about different types of academic events - seminars, conferences, and research papers. It notes that seminars involve small groups of 5-10 people focusing on a particular issue through brief presentations and discussion. Conferences can range from 50 to thousands of attendees and involve opportunities to present work through talks or posters. Research papers follow a standardized structure, with the title and abstract being important to draw readers in. The introduction provides background and objectives, while the methods, results, discussion, and conclusion sections present the study findings and implications. Well-written research involves a clear contribution, intended audience, and structure.

Annotated BibliographyAssignment Requirements1.A minimu.docx

durantheseldine

Annotated Bibliography Assignment Requirements: 1.A minimum of 10 references from reputable sources. 2.Proper APA format for each reference 3.A short summary (one or two sentences) for each source 4.A short description (one or two sentences) of how you plan on using the source in your final persuasive research essay. For this assignment, an annotated bibliography consists of three parts: 1) A list of all the sources you’ve either used or consulted, like for background information, in the writing of your research essay 2) A brief summary of each source, like an abstract. 3) A brief description of how or why you plan on using each particular source in your final persuasive research essay. See the example attached for format guidance. The purpose of the annotated bibliography is to demonstrate not only research skill, but to show others the variety and relevance of all sources consulted or used. These types of documents help to establish an author’s credibility as an expert on his or her essay’s topic. Finally, source reputability is very important for this assignment and for research writing in general. If you use as source that does not come from a reputable publication it will not be counted toward your minimum of ten. Assessment Criteria: In order for an annotated bibliography to earn an “A” it must: Provide references in proper APA format Include a minimum of ten sources from reputable locations Include concise, well-written summaries of each source. Include clear descriptions of how or why you plan on using each of those sources in your final persuasive research essay. Produce a document with few to no minor grammatical and punctuation errors Learning Outcomes Met: Researching Phase: • Identify scholarly articles and journals. Know the difference between primary and secondary sources, and scholarly journals and magazines or other non-academic sources. • Use library databases and services to obtain sources to complete the project. • Assess sources for usability and credibility. • Read, analyze, synthesize, and summarize complex sources, challenging the assumptions, evidence, and fairness of the content. (Partially met.) • Create an annotated working bibliography. Drafting and Editing/Revising Phases: • Use appropriate tone, level of formality, person, and tense https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/annotated-bibliographies/apa-examples/ https://owl.purdue.edu/ .

3 pagesAfter reading the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, address .docx

Topic HIVfour secondary source needed8 pagesMLA format.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Topic HIVfour secondary source needed8 pagesMLA format.docx

Similar to Topic HIVfour secondary source needed8 pagesMLA format.docx (16)

More from novabroom

More from novabroom (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Topic HIVfour secondary source needed8 pagesMLA format.docx