This document discusses progress toward ending the tobacco epidemic in the United States. It outlines key challenges like the health burden of tobacco use and industry marketing. It also highlights recent legislative actions that provide tools to reduce tobacco use, like increasing cigarette taxes, granting FDA regulatory authority, and expanding insurance coverage for cessation services. The document presents an HHS strategic plan to achieve Healthy People 2020 tobacco control objectives through actions like coordinating federal efforts, supporting state programs, changing social norms, and advancing research.
This document discusses tobacco control and prevention policies recommended by the American College of Physicians. It provides background on the health and economic impacts of tobacco use. Key points include:
- Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the US. Comprehensive tobacco control programs are needed to reduce smoking rates.
- The FDA was given authority in 2009 to regulate tobacco, but regulation alone is not enough. States must fund tobacco control efforts and increase tobacco taxes.
- Smokeless tobacco and cigars also harm health. Secondhand smoke exposure causes illness and death in nonsmokers.
Tobacco use is still the leading preventable cause of death in the U.S., killing over 440,000 Americans each year. While smoking rates have declined, progress has stalled in recent years. Comprehensive tobacco control programs that increase tobacco taxes, implement smoke-free laws, fund anti-smoking media campaigns, and increase access to cessation services have been shown to effectively reduce smoking rates and the health burdens and economic costs of tobacco use. However, more remains to be done as the tobacco industry continues to outspend tobacco control efforts. Sustained funding and expansion of comprehensive tobacco control programs nationwide are needed to continue making progress toward creating a tobacco-free generation.
Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death and disease in the United States, responsible for nearly 20% of annual deaths. In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established programs to promote tobacco prevention and control. While smoking rates have declined by around 50% since the 1960s, further reductions are still needed to meet public health targets. Legislative actions, taxation, and prevention programs have improved health outcomes but disparities remain for some groups. Continued evaluation is crucial to refine interventions and sustain progress on this important public health issue.
New York City's spending on antismoking programs has varied in recent years, trending downward as the local adult smoking rate has increased. In 2002, the city launched a tobacco control plan that increased spending on programs like public education campaigns and nicotine replacement therapies. Spending jumped in 2007-2008 but then declined from 2009-2011, and the smoking rate began rising, reaching a 15-year high in 2013. Officials cite declining spending as a cause of the higher smoking rate, and worry it could continue rising with current budgets less than half of 2014 levels.
The document analyzes Mexico's implementation of an IEPS tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to address high rates of obesity and diabetes. It summarizes arguments for and against the tax, noting that while sugar intake contributes to obesity, other factors like inactivity are also involved. It outlines the strategy developed by health authorities to reduce consumption through fiscal and educational measures like prohibiting unhealthy foods in schools. The proposal to Congress included a 1 peso per liter tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to potentially lower disease rates by diminishing negative health impacts and treatment costs.
The document discusses mental health integration and provision for supporting people with mental illness in the UK. It finds that the UK ranks second overall in the Mental Health Integration Index, scoring highly in categories like environment and governance. While each constituent part has its own policies and successes, England is the focus since it contains most of the UK population. The document outlines England's long evolution of policies from deinstitutionalization to recent efforts to achieve "parity of esteem" between mental and physical health. However, it finds that fully implementing reforms and integrating services remains a work in progress, as serious treatment gaps persist.
William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief, NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS (Founded 1982). Dr. LaVelle Henricks, Texas A&M University-Commerce and colleagues published in national refereed journal.
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Distinguished Alumnus, Central Washington University, College of Education and Professional Studies, Ellensburg, Washington; Invited Guest Lecturer, Oxford Round Table, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Hall of Honor, Prairie View A&M University/Member of the Texas A&M University System.
This document discusses tobacco control and prevention policies recommended by the American College of Physicians. It provides background on the health and economic impacts of tobacco use. Key points include:
- Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the US. Comprehensive tobacco control programs are needed to reduce smoking rates.
- The FDA was given authority in 2009 to regulate tobacco, but regulation alone is not enough. States must fund tobacco control efforts and increase tobacco taxes.
- Smokeless tobacco and cigars also harm health. Secondhand smoke exposure causes illness and death in nonsmokers.
Tobacco use is still the leading preventable cause of death in the U.S., killing over 440,000 Americans each year. While smoking rates have declined, progress has stalled in recent years. Comprehensive tobacco control programs that increase tobacco taxes, implement smoke-free laws, fund anti-smoking media campaigns, and increase access to cessation services have been shown to effectively reduce smoking rates and the health burdens and economic costs of tobacco use. However, more remains to be done as the tobacco industry continues to outspend tobacco control efforts. Sustained funding and expansion of comprehensive tobacco control programs nationwide are needed to continue making progress toward creating a tobacco-free generation.
Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death and disease in the United States, responsible for nearly 20% of annual deaths. In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established programs to promote tobacco prevention and control. While smoking rates have declined by around 50% since the 1960s, further reductions are still needed to meet public health targets. Legislative actions, taxation, and prevention programs have improved health outcomes but disparities remain for some groups. Continued evaluation is crucial to refine interventions and sustain progress on this important public health issue.
New York City's spending on antismoking programs has varied in recent years, trending downward as the local adult smoking rate has increased. In 2002, the city launched a tobacco control plan that increased spending on programs like public education campaigns and nicotine replacement therapies. Spending jumped in 2007-2008 but then declined from 2009-2011, and the smoking rate began rising, reaching a 15-year high in 2013. Officials cite declining spending as a cause of the higher smoking rate, and worry it could continue rising with current budgets less than half of 2014 levels.
The document analyzes Mexico's implementation of an IEPS tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to address high rates of obesity and diabetes. It summarizes arguments for and against the tax, noting that while sugar intake contributes to obesity, other factors like inactivity are also involved. It outlines the strategy developed by health authorities to reduce consumption through fiscal and educational measures like prohibiting unhealthy foods in schools. The proposal to Congress included a 1 peso per liter tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to potentially lower disease rates by diminishing negative health impacts and treatment costs.
The document discusses mental health integration and provision for supporting people with mental illness in the UK. It finds that the UK ranks second overall in the Mental Health Integration Index, scoring highly in categories like environment and governance. While each constituent part has its own policies and successes, England is the focus since it contains most of the UK population. The document outlines England's long evolution of policies from deinstitutionalization to recent efforts to achieve "parity of esteem" between mental and physical health. However, it finds that fully implementing reforms and integrating services remains a work in progress, as serious treatment gaps persist.
William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief, NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS (Founded 1982). Dr. LaVelle Henricks, Texas A&M University-Commerce and colleagues published in national refereed journal.
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Distinguished Alumnus, Central Washington University, College of Education and Professional Studies, Ellensburg, Washington; Invited Guest Lecturer, Oxford Round Table, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Hall of Honor, Prairie View A&M University/Member of the Texas A&M University System.
This document summarizes a journal article that examines the relationship between public expenditure and health status in Ghana. The main findings are:
1) The availability of physicians and health insurance are the most important determinants of health status in Ghana, as measured by under-five mortality rate.
2) Contrary to some previous studies, income per capita was found to be an insignificant determinant of health status in Ghana.
3) The results support increasing public investment in health, especially to train more physicians, as well as expanding Ghana's national health insurance program.
The document discusses causes of inequalities in wealth and health such as unemployment, low income, age, gender, and race. It outlines UK government strategies to reduce these inequalities, including legislation, directing resources to the old and children, advertising campaigns, welfare-to-work programs, and promoting individual responsibility and social inclusion. The government has had mixed success in meeting its targets to improve wealth, health, and reduce inequalities, but overall progress has been more positive than negative.
This document summarizes the report of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee on the UK government's alcohol consumption guidelines. It provides background on the guidelines and their history. It discusses the evidence base for the guidelines and whether it has been adequately reviewed. It also examines how well the guidelines are communicated to and understood by the public, and compares the UK guidelines to those of other countries. The report concludes that the evidence base for using purported health benefits of alcohol as a basis for daily guidelines is weak. It finds public awareness of guidelines is high but understanding is lacking. It recommends the government establish a working group to thoroughly review the evidence and advise on updating the guidelines.
Spread & Ill effects of Smoking: A statistical & Infographical approachDhiraj Jhunjhunwala
1) The document is a research paper on the spread and ill-effects of smoking with a statistical and infographic approach. It includes an introduction, methodology, findings with statistics and graphs, data analysis, and conclusion.
2) The findings section shows statistics on men vs women smokers in India, world smoking statistics, graphs on smoking rates by age and cancer risk by cigarettes smoked. India has over 12 million female smokers, the highest of any country.
3) The data analysis notes the increased cancer risk with higher smoking consumption. India ranks 2nd in the world for smoking rates. Smoking causes the highest economic losses globally compared to terrorism.
The document discusses reforms to the UK's public health system as outlined in the white paper "Healthy Lives, Healthy People". Key points of the reform include giving local authorities stronger leadership over public health services tailored to local needs, establishing Public Health England to provide expertise and support, and prioritizing reducing health inequalities. The response to initial proposals was mixed, with support for some elements but also criticisms and requests for further clarity. Additional work is planned over the coming months to further develop policies and implementation plans on issues like the public health outcomes framework, Public Health England's operating model, and workforce strategy.
The document summarizes the proposed changes to the public health system in England, including:
1) The establishment of Public Health England and a new leadership structure at the local level through directors of public health within local authorities.
2) The creation of health and wellbeing boards to promote integrated working across health and social care.
3) A new public health outcomes framework and ringfenced public health funding for local authorities from 2013.
4) The need for the voluntary and community sector to understand the new system and identify how it can contribute to outcomes.
The white paper outlines plans to improve public health in England by:
1) Giving local authorities new responsibilities and funding to improve population health.
2) Establishing Public Health England to work with local authorities on public health.
3) Developing a new public health outcomes framework to monitor progress and provide incentives for health improvement.
Gebrewold_Economics of Tobacco Control_ Final PaperBineyam Gebrewold
1) Raising tobacco taxes in Ethiopia could help reduce smoking rates, especially among youth, by making cigarettes less affordable. Currently, Ethiopia has relatively low tobacco taxes.
2) While overall smoking rates in Ethiopia are low compared to other developing nations, certain regions like Gambella have much higher smoking prevalence. Raising tobacco prices through taxes could discourage smoking across the country.
3) Studies show that a 10% increase in cigarette prices due to taxes typically leads to at least a 5% reduction in tobacco consumption. Increasing Ethiopia's tobacco taxes could thus lower health risks while also generating more tax revenue.
Public health lowdown, with the Solent Delta blues John Middleton
This document summarizes a presentation given by Professor John Middleton, President of the Faculty of Public Health, about public health issues. It discusses the Faculty of Public Health, its role in improving and protecting public health through training, advocacy and knowledge. It highlights issues like teenage pregnancy rates, housing quality, mortality rates, non-communicable diseases, conflicts over natural resources, and climate change refugees that impact public health. It also outlines Professor Middleton's goals as President, which include strengthening relationships across the UK, implementing a new public health curriculum, and addressing issues like Brexit, antimicrobial resistance, and violence prevention.
Financial losses in smoking and its consequences in bangladeshAlexander Decker
This document summarizes the financial losses and consequences of smoking in Bangladesh. It finds that smoking causes huge financial losses at the individual, family, and national levels. Direct losses include costs of tobacco production and purchasing cigarettes. Indirect losses include lost productivity, increased healthcare costs, and environmental damage. Smoking also has negative health consequences that impact families and society through increased disease burden and social issues like crime. The aim of the paper is to analyze these costs and impacts to discourage smoking in Bangladesh.
Securing and delivering devolution in partnership, pop up uni, 11am, 2 septem...NHS England
Expo is the most significant annual health and social care event in the calendar, uniting more NHS and care leaders, commissioners, clinicians, voluntary sector partners, innovators and media than any other health and care event.
Expo 15 returned to Manchester and was hosted once again by NHS England. Around 5000 people a day from health and care, the voluntary sector, local government, and industry joined together at Manchester Central Convention Centre for two packed days of speakers, workshops, exhibitions and professional development.
This year, Expo was more relevant and engaging than ever before, happening within the first 100 days of the new Government, and almost 12 months after the publication of the NHS Five Year Forward View. It was also a great opportunity to check on and learn from the progress of Greater Manchester as the area prepares to take over a £6 billion devolved health and social care budget, pledging to integrate hospital, community, primary and social care and vastly improve health and well-being.
More information is available online: www.expo.nhs.uk
Securing and delivering devolution in partnership, pop up uni, 10am, 3 septem...NHS England
Expo is the most significant annual health and social care event in the calendar, uniting more NHS and care leaders, commissioners, clinicians, voluntary sector partners, innovators and media than any other health and care event.
Expo 15 returned to Manchester and was hosted once again by NHS England. Around 5000 people a day from health and care, the voluntary sector, local government, and industry joined together at Manchester Central Convention Centre for two packed days of speakers, workshops, exhibitions and professional development.
This year, Expo was more relevant and engaging than ever before, happening within the first 100 days of the new Government, and almost 12 months after the publication of the NHS Five Year Forward View. It was also a great opportunity to check on and learn from the progress of Greater Manchester as the area prepares to take over a £6 billion devolved health and social care budget, pledging to integrate hospital, community, primary and social care and vastly improve health and well-being.
More information is available online: www.expo.nhs.uk
Health in Southampton: Assessing smoking and air pollution variation within t...Nick Kirrage
This document provides an overview of smoking and air pollution in Southampton. It discusses the literature on the social and spatial epidemiology of smoking, noting higher rates among lower socioeconomic groups and certain regions. The document then reviews air pollution literature, referencing a 1952 smog event in London that caused thousands of deaths. The document aims to examine smoking and air pollution rates and their relationships to inequalities within Southampton.
Economics Of Tobacco Control In Developing CountriesPRN USM
The document discusses the economics of tobacco control in developing countries. It finds that smoking places a large burden on healthcare systems and costs countries hundreds of billions annually. Smoking is linked to increased rates of chronic diseases and deaths in developing nations. Raising cigarette taxes is identified as the most effective policy for reducing smoking rates and healthcare costs, as it disproportionately impacts youth and low-income populations. Non-price tobacco control policies can also help curb smoking.
Health spending is likely to continue growing faster than economic growth, putting pressure on public budgets. While accommodating greater health spending may be acceptable, opportunities exist to increase productivity in health systems. In the long run, the correlation between health spending and GDP may need to be weakened to ensure fiscal sustainability, through policies like improving efficiency, shifting focus to prevention, and better defining public coverage.
This document contains a student's personality profile. It describes that the student likes listening to music and reading books by John Green, but does not enjoy exercise or sports. Their favorite colors are lilac and turquoise. The student has a positive outlook and loves nature, animals, and plants. They see themselves as a very loving person who cares for others regardless of how they are treated in return.
Cristhian Albiño is a student in the 1st parallel of course B, taught by teacher Vinicio Asimbaya. The topic of the test Cristhian took was a correction test.
El documento describe las instrucciones para completar varias prácticas de programación en Java que involucran cálculos matemáticos como el área de un cuadrado, el promedio de 6 materias, el descuento de un carro y el área de un triángulo. Para cada práctica se indica abrir NetBeans, seleccionar New Project y elegir Java como lenguaje de programación.
This document summarizes a journal article that examines the relationship between public expenditure and health status in Ghana. The main findings are:
1) The availability of physicians and health insurance are the most important determinants of health status in Ghana, as measured by under-five mortality rate.
2) Contrary to some previous studies, income per capita was found to be an insignificant determinant of health status in Ghana.
3) The results support increasing public investment in health, especially to train more physicians, as well as expanding Ghana's national health insurance program.
The document discusses causes of inequalities in wealth and health such as unemployment, low income, age, gender, and race. It outlines UK government strategies to reduce these inequalities, including legislation, directing resources to the old and children, advertising campaigns, welfare-to-work programs, and promoting individual responsibility and social inclusion. The government has had mixed success in meeting its targets to improve wealth, health, and reduce inequalities, but overall progress has been more positive than negative.
This document summarizes the report of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee on the UK government's alcohol consumption guidelines. It provides background on the guidelines and their history. It discusses the evidence base for the guidelines and whether it has been adequately reviewed. It also examines how well the guidelines are communicated to and understood by the public, and compares the UK guidelines to those of other countries. The report concludes that the evidence base for using purported health benefits of alcohol as a basis for daily guidelines is weak. It finds public awareness of guidelines is high but understanding is lacking. It recommends the government establish a working group to thoroughly review the evidence and advise on updating the guidelines.
Spread & Ill effects of Smoking: A statistical & Infographical approachDhiraj Jhunjhunwala
1) The document is a research paper on the spread and ill-effects of smoking with a statistical and infographic approach. It includes an introduction, methodology, findings with statistics and graphs, data analysis, and conclusion.
2) The findings section shows statistics on men vs women smokers in India, world smoking statistics, graphs on smoking rates by age and cancer risk by cigarettes smoked. India has over 12 million female smokers, the highest of any country.
3) The data analysis notes the increased cancer risk with higher smoking consumption. India ranks 2nd in the world for smoking rates. Smoking causes the highest economic losses globally compared to terrorism.
The document discusses reforms to the UK's public health system as outlined in the white paper "Healthy Lives, Healthy People". Key points of the reform include giving local authorities stronger leadership over public health services tailored to local needs, establishing Public Health England to provide expertise and support, and prioritizing reducing health inequalities. The response to initial proposals was mixed, with support for some elements but also criticisms and requests for further clarity. Additional work is planned over the coming months to further develop policies and implementation plans on issues like the public health outcomes framework, Public Health England's operating model, and workforce strategy.
The document summarizes the proposed changes to the public health system in England, including:
1) The establishment of Public Health England and a new leadership structure at the local level through directors of public health within local authorities.
2) The creation of health and wellbeing boards to promote integrated working across health and social care.
3) A new public health outcomes framework and ringfenced public health funding for local authorities from 2013.
4) The need for the voluntary and community sector to understand the new system and identify how it can contribute to outcomes.
The white paper outlines plans to improve public health in England by:
1) Giving local authorities new responsibilities and funding to improve population health.
2) Establishing Public Health England to work with local authorities on public health.
3) Developing a new public health outcomes framework to monitor progress and provide incentives for health improvement.
Gebrewold_Economics of Tobacco Control_ Final PaperBineyam Gebrewold
1) Raising tobacco taxes in Ethiopia could help reduce smoking rates, especially among youth, by making cigarettes less affordable. Currently, Ethiopia has relatively low tobacco taxes.
2) While overall smoking rates in Ethiopia are low compared to other developing nations, certain regions like Gambella have much higher smoking prevalence. Raising tobacco prices through taxes could discourage smoking across the country.
3) Studies show that a 10% increase in cigarette prices due to taxes typically leads to at least a 5% reduction in tobacco consumption. Increasing Ethiopia's tobacco taxes could thus lower health risks while also generating more tax revenue.
Public health lowdown, with the Solent Delta blues John Middleton
This document summarizes a presentation given by Professor John Middleton, President of the Faculty of Public Health, about public health issues. It discusses the Faculty of Public Health, its role in improving and protecting public health through training, advocacy and knowledge. It highlights issues like teenage pregnancy rates, housing quality, mortality rates, non-communicable diseases, conflicts over natural resources, and climate change refugees that impact public health. It also outlines Professor Middleton's goals as President, which include strengthening relationships across the UK, implementing a new public health curriculum, and addressing issues like Brexit, antimicrobial resistance, and violence prevention.
Financial losses in smoking and its consequences in bangladeshAlexander Decker
This document summarizes the financial losses and consequences of smoking in Bangladesh. It finds that smoking causes huge financial losses at the individual, family, and national levels. Direct losses include costs of tobacco production and purchasing cigarettes. Indirect losses include lost productivity, increased healthcare costs, and environmental damage. Smoking also has negative health consequences that impact families and society through increased disease burden and social issues like crime. The aim of the paper is to analyze these costs and impacts to discourage smoking in Bangladesh.
Securing and delivering devolution in partnership, pop up uni, 11am, 2 septem...NHS England
Expo is the most significant annual health and social care event in the calendar, uniting more NHS and care leaders, commissioners, clinicians, voluntary sector partners, innovators and media than any other health and care event.
Expo 15 returned to Manchester and was hosted once again by NHS England. Around 5000 people a day from health and care, the voluntary sector, local government, and industry joined together at Manchester Central Convention Centre for two packed days of speakers, workshops, exhibitions and professional development.
This year, Expo was more relevant and engaging than ever before, happening within the first 100 days of the new Government, and almost 12 months after the publication of the NHS Five Year Forward View. It was also a great opportunity to check on and learn from the progress of Greater Manchester as the area prepares to take over a £6 billion devolved health and social care budget, pledging to integrate hospital, community, primary and social care and vastly improve health and well-being.
More information is available online: www.expo.nhs.uk
Securing and delivering devolution in partnership, pop up uni, 10am, 3 septem...NHS England
Expo is the most significant annual health and social care event in the calendar, uniting more NHS and care leaders, commissioners, clinicians, voluntary sector partners, innovators and media than any other health and care event.
Expo 15 returned to Manchester and was hosted once again by NHS England. Around 5000 people a day from health and care, the voluntary sector, local government, and industry joined together at Manchester Central Convention Centre for two packed days of speakers, workshops, exhibitions and professional development.
This year, Expo was more relevant and engaging than ever before, happening within the first 100 days of the new Government, and almost 12 months after the publication of the NHS Five Year Forward View. It was also a great opportunity to check on and learn from the progress of Greater Manchester as the area prepares to take over a £6 billion devolved health and social care budget, pledging to integrate hospital, community, primary and social care and vastly improve health and well-being.
More information is available online: www.expo.nhs.uk
Health in Southampton: Assessing smoking and air pollution variation within t...Nick Kirrage
This document provides an overview of smoking and air pollution in Southampton. It discusses the literature on the social and spatial epidemiology of smoking, noting higher rates among lower socioeconomic groups and certain regions. The document then reviews air pollution literature, referencing a 1952 smog event in London that caused thousands of deaths. The document aims to examine smoking and air pollution rates and their relationships to inequalities within Southampton.
Economics Of Tobacco Control In Developing CountriesPRN USM
The document discusses the economics of tobacco control in developing countries. It finds that smoking places a large burden on healthcare systems and costs countries hundreds of billions annually. Smoking is linked to increased rates of chronic diseases and deaths in developing nations. Raising cigarette taxes is identified as the most effective policy for reducing smoking rates and healthcare costs, as it disproportionately impacts youth and low-income populations. Non-price tobacco control policies can also help curb smoking.
Health spending is likely to continue growing faster than economic growth, putting pressure on public budgets. While accommodating greater health spending may be acceptable, opportunities exist to increase productivity in health systems. In the long run, the correlation between health spending and GDP may need to be weakened to ensure fiscal sustainability, through policies like improving efficiency, shifting focus to prevention, and better defining public coverage.
This document contains a student's personality profile. It describes that the student likes listening to music and reading books by John Green, but does not enjoy exercise or sports. Their favorite colors are lilac and turquoise. The student has a positive outlook and loves nature, animals, and plants. They see themselves as a very loving person who cares for others regardless of how they are treated in return.
Cristhian Albiño is a student in the 1st parallel of course B, taught by teacher Vinicio Asimbaya. The topic of the test Cristhian took was a correction test.
El documento describe las instrucciones para completar varias prácticas de programación en Java que involucran cálculos matemáticos como el área de un cuadrado, el promedio de 6 materias, el descuento de un carro y el área de un triángulo. Para cada práctica se indica abrir NetBeans, seleccionar New Project y elegir Java como lenguaje de programación.
El documento describe los pasos para crear un proyecto en Netbeans 7.2 llamado "PRACTICA1" y escribir un programa sencillo que declara una variable byte llamada "edad" e imprime su valor por pantalla.
Android tiene la mayor cuota de mercado de sistemas operativos móviles con un 84,1%, seguido de iOS con 14,8%. Android se basa en Linux y puede usarse en teléfonos inteligentes, tablets y otras plataformas. iOS es el sistema operativo de los dispositivos de Apple como iPhone e iPad, y se caracteriza por su simplicidad y optimización de hardware y software. Windows Phone, anteriormente Windows Mobile, es el sistema operativo de Microsoft para móviles.
El documento describe los pasos para crear un proyecto en Netbeans utilizando programación orientada a objetos. Inicialmente se abre Netbeans y se crea un nuevo proyecto llamado "Practica 4". Luego se agregan variables con los nombres, apellidos y otros datos del estudiante y se imprimen estos valores utilizando sentencias System.out.println. Finalmente, el proyecto se ejecuta correctamente.
The document discusses the need for regulations to govern nanomedicine as it holds promise but also risks. It notes that while nanoparticles show potential in drug delivery, imaging and implants, regulatory frameworks have not fully addressed their oversight. It advocates that meticulous pre-clinical testing and expert review can help minimize risks until standards, definitions and safety protocols are in place to properly assess nanomaterials' interactions and impacts in biological systems.
El documento detalla los porcentajes asignados a diferentes criterios de evaluación para un curso, incluyendo un cuaderno con un 20%, blogs y plataformas con un 10%, un portafolio con un 10%, ejercicios o prácticas con un 20%, participación con un 10%, tareas con un 10%, y una evaluación central con un 20%.
This document discusses technologies driving sustainability in medical devices. It begins by outlining various structural, surface, and drug delivery materials that are being developed, including metals, plastics, ceramics, coatings, and biomolecules. It then discusses trends in younger patients needing longer-lasting devices and challenges in developing medical technology. Overall, the document advocates leveraging emerging technologies like 3D printing, tissue engineering, and smart materials to develop more personalized and targeted diagnostics and therapeutics while addressing concerns over regulatory approval and reimbursement.
A study on the marshall properties of dbm mix prepared using vg 30 and crmb-5...eSAT Journals
produce a mix which is supposed to be sufficiently sturdy, long-lasting,
resistive.DBM is used as a binder course in the highway pavement. Binder is a prime material in the bituminous mix. Marshall
properties of bituminous mix varies from binder to binder. In this work an effort has been ended to evaluate the Marshall
properties of dense bituminous macadam prepared using VG-30 and CRMB-55 as binder materials. DBM mix is prepared using
2% lime as filler material and VG-30, CRMB-55 as binder material. Marshall method of bituminous mix design is adopted to
decide the optimum bitumen content (OBC )and Marshall properties were determined at optimum bitumen content. On the basis
of limited laboratory studies carried out, it is conclude that CRMB-55 is superior binder material in terms of Marshall properties.
Key Words: VG-30, CRMB-55, Lime, and DBM.
Keynote on conference "Changing Landscapes. The Exchange of Experiences in the Changing Distance Learning Landscape" from European Association of Distance Learning (EADL). 26 May 2016, Nicosia, Cyprus
Las directivas en JSP se usan para proporcionar información al motor JSP para generar la página. Existen tres tipos de directivas: página, inclusión de archivos y librería de etiquetas. La directiva page se usa para definir atributos que se aplican a toda la página JSP e incluye archivos, como el tipo de contenido, la página de error y la importación de clases.
NUR 512: Community Health Program Evaluation Julmiste35
Tobacco use remains a major public health issue in the United States, as cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death. While tobacco use has declined over the past 50 years, almost 20% of Americans still use tobacco. Tobacco use results in approximately 443,000 deaths annually and costs over $193 billion in medical costs each year. The Healthy People 2020 initiative aims to reduce tobacco use through policies restricting advertising, increasing prices, and expanding smoke-free laws and cessation programs to curb both initiation and use. Progress is monitored through ongoing data collection and surveys to evaluate programs and update interventions.
Review Paper - Addiction of Cigarette Smoking.pdfRAlphabet18
This review paper investigates cigarette smoking addiction, covering its physical and mental mechanisms, societal influences on smoking habits, health risks, quitting difficulties, and cessation interventions.
Tobacco use is a major public health problem that causes preventable disease and death. Smoking kills over 393,000 Americans each year and costs the US over $193 billion annually. Tobacco use increases the risk of cancer, heart disease, COPD and other illnesses. Healthy People 2020 aims to reduce tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure through policies, prevention programs, and healthcare interventions. Progress is monitored through objectives and national surveys to improve the nation's health.
Editorial: Evidence based policy or policy based evidence? by Michael MarmotJim Bloyd, DrPH, MPH
A simple prescription would be to review the scientific evidence of what would make a difference, formulate policies, and implement them—evidence based policy making. Unfor- tunately this simple prescription, applied to real life, is simplistic. The relation between science and policy is more complicated. Scientific findings do not fall on blank minds that get made up as a result. Science engages with busy minds that have strong views about how things are and ought to be.
Evidence-Based Public Health Tobacco Use Prevention.docxSANSKAR20
Evidence-Based Public Health Tobacco Use Prevention
Joseph Toole
Evidence-Based Public Health
6 February 2017
The purpose of this research paper is to provide justification for the need of evidence based public health for tobacco usage, more specifically, smoking in Alaskan adults who are 18 years of age and older. In providing research for this justification, it will discuss the specific health condition or health risk. By discussing, it will provide information regarding tobacco usage and some of the health related risks surrounding it. It will also cover the target population of those being affected by tobacco usage as well as the size and scope of the issues revolving around tobacco usage. This research paper will conclude with some prevention opportunities and potential stakeholders.
Tobacco use can take place in a variety of forms such as cigarettes, cigars, hookah and smokeless tobacco also known as chew or dip. It has been discovered that there are at least 250 of the 4000 chemicals identified in cigarette smoke alone which is the form of tobacco usage this research is primarily focused on. In regards to cigarette smoking, it has been found that some of the most toxic chemical associated with it are hydrogen cyanide which is a chemical primarily found in weapons. Another toxic chemical associated with cigarette smoking is carbon monoxide which is a chemical primarily found in automobile exhaust. Additional toxic chemical found in cigarette smoke include formaldehyde which is embalming fluid used to preserve the death of loved ones, ammonia which is found in common household cleaners and toluene which is used in paint thinners (Oregon State University, 2015). Tobacco use is considered to be the leading cause in preventable illness as well as death in the United States. It has be known to cause a wide variety of cancers which also include chronic lung disease such as bronchitis and emphysema. It also causes pregnancy related complications, heart disease and can potentially cause other serious health issues (Department of Health and Human Services, 2017). As mentioned, the reproductive effects include ectopic pregnancy, premature birth, low birth weight, reduced fertility in women, stillbirth, erectile dysfunction in men, birth defects which include clept lip and or cleft palate. Other effects associated with smoking tobacco include type 2 diabetes, age related macular degeneration, rheumatoid arthritis, cataracts, blindness, impaired immune functions, hip fractures, periodontitis and just an overall diminished health status (Healthy People 2020, 2017). The same causes are found in Alaskans. Research shows that on an annual basis, more Alaskans die from the direct effects of smoking tobacco then HIV/AIDS, homicide, motor vehicle crashes, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis combined. In 2012, it was reported that tobacco usage in Alaska cost an estimated $538 million dollars in medical expenditures as well as an additional $231 m ...
CDC Update: Joining Forces to Reduce Tobacco and Cancer Among Behavioral Heal...sfary
From the the first Annual National Conference on Tobacco and Behavioral Health, which occurred May 19-20, 2014 in Bethesda, MD and was hosted by the Central East Addiction Technology Transfer Center, a program of The Danya Institute. You can see videos from the conference on our website www.ceattc.org (go to “Tobacco and Behavioral Health Resources” under “Special Topics”).
Tim McAfee, MD, MPH, is Director of CDC’s Office on Smoking and Health (OSH) within the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. He is responsible for providing leadership and direction for all scientific, policy, and programmatic issues related to tobacco control and prevention. Before ed his residency training at Group Health Cooperative in Seattle and completed a fellowship at the University of Washington. Dr. McAfee has been a principal investigator and co-investigator on numerous research studies focusing on questions related to the effectiveness and dissemination of telephone- and Web-based tobacco cessation programs in medical systems and through government-sponsored quitlines. He helped found and served on the Board of Directors of the North American Quitline Consortium as well as numerous state and national tobacco policy advisory groups. He also authored the World Health Organization’s quitline manual for low- and middle-income countries.
Prevention SPL The Determinators Final 8-16-2012_201302011043123860.pptxJanetOdhiambo2
The documents discuss the importance of prevention in addressing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders, as well as substance abuse issues. Prevention is described as a multidisciplinary field that studies how to prevent health and social problems. The National Prevention Strategy aims to improve health and quality of life through prevention and wellness. Research shows that prevention programs are cost-effective and can save money compared to treatment costs. Data demonstrates that reducing substance abuse at even small levels can significantly impact lives and save money in healthcare costs. A variety of prevention approaches are discussed at individual, community, and environmental levels.
State of tobacco control in Nebraska 04 20-11 2Cindy Jeffrey
This document provides an overview of tobacco control efforts in Nebraska from the perspective of an economist. It discusses trends in tobacco use, policies to reduce tobacco use such as smoke-free laws and tobacco taxes, and tobacco industry marketing practices. The document summarizes that while tobacco use has declined, more can still be done through increased funding for tobacco prevention and cessation programs, stronger restrictions on tobacco marketing, and increasing tobacco taxes. Raising cigarette taxes in particular could generate over $90 million in additional tax revenues and reduce youth smoking initiation and adult smoking rates.
This grant proposal seeks funding for a program to reduce smoking and smoking-related deaths in Gallatin County, Kentucky. According to data, smoking rates and lung cancer deaths are higher in Gallatin County than statewide averages. The proposal outlines a series of evidence-based interventions targeting adolescents and adults, including educational sessions addressing media influences, stress management, and social influences on smoking. The goal is to reduce adult smoking rates by 30% and the number of households with smokers by 50% by 2020 to ultimately lower lung cancer mortality in the county. A needs assessment provides background on the county's demographics, health indicators, and behavioral and environmental factors related to tobacco use.
This study examined the association between tobacco control policies and smoking prevalence, denormalization of smoking, and public support for tobacco control across European Union countries. The researchers found that countries with higher scores on the Tobacco Control Scale (measuring implementation of tobacco policies) had more smokers who reported quitting due to concerns about passive smoking harming others. This concern about passive smoking was also strongly correlated with greater public support for tobacco control policies. The results suggest that addressing concerns about passive smoking is important for advancing tobacco control measures and denormalizing tobacco use in Europe.
Over the past 50 years, cigarette smoking and other combusted tobacco products have caused over 20 million American deaths. The tobacco epidemic was driven by misleading and aggressive strategies of the tobacco industry. While electronic nicotine delivery systems like e-cigarettes may help reduce harm if they replace combusted tobacco entirely, they must be regulated to prevent youth uptake and minimize risks. The 2014 Surgeon General's report recommends fully funding tobacco control programs, raising cigarette taxes, and making cessation treatment widely available to continue progress against the tobacco epidemic.
The document discusses the health promotion activity of encouraging smoking cessation. It assesses the health needs, outlines the target group as smokers, and chooses an educational approach to provide information about the benefits of quitting smoking. The aims are to increase awareness of benefits, diseases caused by smoking, and where to get help. Process evaluation determined the information provided addressed different learning styles and was effective at engaging the target group.
Tobacco use is a major public health problem that kills over 5 million people worldwide each year. In Sudan, smoking prevalence among males is around 24% compared to only 2% among females. There are effective tobacco control strategies available through the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) including tax increases, advertising bans, smoke-free laws, health warnings on packages, and cessation support. Quitting tobacco has significant health, economic, and social benefits for individuals and their families.
Impact of the 2009 Tobacco Act on the access and consumption of itMalikPinckney86
Impact of the 2009 Tobacco Act on the access and consumption of it by young adults in Miami-Dade County of the State of FLORIDA.
Chapter One Introduction
Despite a substantial decline in the number of people who smoke, tobacco use remains the leading cause of chronic illness and death in the United States today, as it has been for decades. The Tobacco Control Law; It is the law in the United States that was passed to provide some regulations and restrictions on the use and consumption of tobacco. It was signed and approved by President Barack Obama on June 22, 2009. The main objective of the law was to make various modifications and regulations on the consumption and sale of tobacco. The law has achieved several achievements and implementations in the maintenance and regulation of the consumption and use of tobacco in the United States. Since the implementation period, it has created tobacco awareness through the packaging of tobacco products. Thanks to awareness, tobacco use has been minimized, this law regulates the manufacture, distribution and marketing of tobacco products in order to protect the public and create a healthier future. After voters passed a constitutional amendment that bans smoking in workplaces and restaurants, but not in bars, the state of Florida became one of the first to adopt smoke-free policies in the United States (Grattan, Schmitt and Porter, 2020). Local efforts to protect people from secondhand smoke continued after the law was passed in other areas. For example, are there smoke-free policies or tobacco in 28 Florida colleges and universities. In addition, the state's 16 public housing authorities have adopted a smoke-free policy (Nonnemaker et.al, 2021). Tobacco prevention and control activities are a public health problem in the state of Florida, as evidence-based state tobacco control programs have led to fewer smokers, fewer illnesses and fewer deaths tobacco related.
1.1 Research problem
In the state of Florida, most adults are addicted to cigarettes and become daily smokers before the age of 18. The sooner a person becomes addicted to tobacco products, the longer they will be exposed to hundreds of harmful chemicals (Martinasek et. Al, 2015). While it is certainly beneficial, concentrating most of the preventive effort through the Tobacco Law, as has been done in the last decade, proper implementation is necessary since its designed intention is to protect young adults with high consumption of tobacco. tobacco.
1.2 Justification and relevance of the study
Youth and adult smoking behavior has increased due to access and exposure to tobacco products in shops in their daily lives. The tobacco law provides us with information on particular conditions that affect public health, referring to the Florida Statutes of 2011 Part II that addresses indoor air and tobacco smoke (Florida Senate, 2021). The law has gained momentum throughout Florida as a statewide campaign that seeks to raise awareness with the ...
This document discusses tobacco control strategies according to the WHO MPOWER framework. It summarizes the six policies of MPOWER: Monitor tobacco use and prevention policies; Protect people from tobacco smoke; Offer help to quit tobacco use; Warn about the dangers of tobacco; Enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship; and Raise taxes on tobacco. For each policy, it provides details on effective implementation strategies, such as establishing comprehensive smoke-free laws and public education campaigns about the health risks of tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure.
Reducing Tobacco Use Among Adolescents Using Social Cognitive Theory and Soci...Shauna Ayres, MPH, CHES
This document discusses reducing tobacco use among adolescents using Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Social Network Theory (SNT). It summarizes key aspects of SCT, including its focus on personal, behavioral, and environmental factors that influence health behaviors. Studies discussed found targeting self-efficacy, normative beliefs, and intentions through programs and policies were effective in preventing or reducing tobacco use. The document suggests using a multi-strategy approach incorporating several SCT constructs is most effective for interventions.
In the current write up, Supervisor Support has been used as one o.docxbradburgess22840
In the current write up, Supervisor Support has been used as one of the independent variable to explain OCB. But now Supervisor Support is used as mediator to explain OCB. The write up has captured almost everything and need to add few more paragraphs only how two independent variables (Leaders Moderation Orientation and People Orientation) lead to Supervisor Support that lead to OCB. Hence, the following changes are required as mentioned below:
1. Arguments to be developed for supervisor support as mediating variable under introduction, background, problem statement, objectives and research questions with relevant referencing. I have developed the research question and is highlighted in green for your reference in the attached document.
2. Under conceptual framework, it is required to write up the arguments showing the relationship between each independent variables (Leaders Moderation Orientation & People Orientation) with Supervisor Support with relevant referencing. The new diagram is attached and need to follow the diagram while making arguments.
3. Need to make changes in Methodology (chapter 3) as corrected.
I have attached the lists of tables and articles to help for the write up. Whatever corrections are made please highlight with green and no plagiarism
405
The Use and Abuse
of Tobacco
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After completing the study of this concept, you will be able to:
▶ Identify the most widely used forms of tobacco and the contents of tobacco
products that contribute to negative health outcomes.
▶ Describe the negative health and economic costs of cigarette and cigar smoking
and smokeless tobacco use.
▶ Describe secondhand smoke and identify the negative health consequences of
secondhand smoke exposure.
▶ Understand trends in the prevalence of tobacco use.
▶ Identify important factors contributing to recent reductions in tobacco use in the
United States.
▶ Describe efforts by the tobacco industry to maintain higher rates of smoking.
▶ Identify effective prevention and intervention approaches designed to reduce rates
of tobacco use.
C
o
n
c
e
p
t 1
8
Avoiding Destructive Behaviors ▶ Section VII
Tobacco use is the number one
cause of preventable disease and is
associated with the leading causes of
death in our culture.
cor22568_ch18_405-416.indd 405 9/21/12 7:32 PM
F
O
S
T
E
R
,
C
E
D
R
I
C
1
6
9
2
T
S
406 Section 7 ▶ Avoiding Destructive Behaviors
Smokeless chewing tobacco is as addictive (and
maybe more so) as smoking and produces the
same kind of withdrawal symptoms. Chewing
tobacco comes in a variety of forms, including loose leaf,
twist, and plug forms. Rather than being smoked, the
dip, chew, or chaw stays in the mouth for several hours,
where it mixes well with saliva and is absorbed into the
bloodstream. Smokeless tobacco contains about seven
times more nicotine than cigarettes, and more of it is
absorbed because of the length .
This document outlines the Philippine National Tobacco Control Strategy from 2011-2016. It notes that tobacco use is a leading preventable cause of death globally and in the Philippines. The strategy was developed in response to the country's high tobacco use rates and obligations under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. It aims to promote full implementation of the WHO-FCTC and mobilize public action through strategies like strengthening organizational capacity and advocacy. If left unaddressed, tobacco is projected to kill over 8 million people annually by 2030.
Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson: Titans of Influence and Inspirationgreendigital
Introduction
In the realm of entertainment, few names resonate as Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson. Both figures have carved unique paths in the industry. achieving unparalleled success and becoming iconic symbols of perseverance, resilience, and inspiration. This article delves into the lives, careers. and enduring legacies of Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson. exploring how their journeys intersect and what we can learn from their remarkable stories.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Early Life and Backgrounds
Orpah Winfrey: From Humble Beginnings to Media Mogul
Orpah Winfrey, often known as Oprah due to a misspelling on her birth certificate. was born on January 29, 1954, in Kosciusko, Mississippi. Raised in poverty by her grandmother, Winfrey's early life was marked by hardship and adversity. Despite these challenges. she demonstrated a keen intellect and an early talent for public speaking.
Winfrey's journey to success began with a scholarship to Tennessee State University. where she studied communication. Her first job in media was as a co-anchor for the local evening news in Nashville. This role paved the way for her eventual transition to talk show hosting. where she found her true calling.
Dwayne Johnson: From Wrestling Royalty to Hollywood Superstar
Dwayne Johnson, also known by his ring name "The Rock," was born on May 2, 1972, in Hayward, California. He comes from a family of professional wrestlers, with both his father, Rocky Johnson. and his grandfather, Peter Maivia, being notable figures in the wrestling world. Johnson's early life was spent moving between New Zealand and the United States. experiencing a variety of cultural influences.
Before entering the world of professional wrestling. Johnson had aspirations of becoming a professional football player. He played college football at the University of Miami. where he was part of a national championship team. But, injuries curtailed his football career, leading him to follow in his family's footsteps and enter the wrestling ring.
Career Milestones
Orpah Winfrey: The Queen of All Media
Winfrey's career breakthrough came in 1986 when she launched "The Oprah Winfrey Show." The show became a cultural phenomenon. drawing millions of viewers daily and earning many awards. Winfrey's empathetic and candid interviewing style resonated with audiences. helping her tackle diverse and often challenging topics.
Beyond her talk show, Winfrey expanded her empire to include the creation of Harpo Productions. a multimedia production company. She also launched "O, The Oprah Magazine" and OWN: Oprah Winfrey Network, further solidifying her status as a media mogul.
Dwayne Johnson: From The Ring to The Big Screen
Dwayne Johnson's wrestling career took off in the late 1990s. when he became one of the most charismatic and popular figures in WWE. His larger-than-life persona and catchphrases endeared him to fans. making him a household name. But, Johnson had ambitions beyond the wrestling ring.
In the early 20
Leonardo DiCaprio House: A Journey Through His Extravagant Real Estate Portfoliogreendigital
Introduction
Leonardo DiCaprio, A name synonymous with Hollywood excellence. is not only known for his stellar acting career but also for his impressive real estate investments. The "Leonardo DiCaprio house" is a topic that piques the interest of many. as the Oscar-winning actor has amassed a diverse portfolio of luxurious properties. DiCaprio's homes reflect his varied tastes and commitment to sustainability. from retreats to historic mansions. This article will delve into the fascinating world of Leonardo DiCaprio's real estate. Exploring the details of his most notable residences. and the unique aspects that make them stand out.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Leonardo DiCaprio House: Malibu Beachfront Retreat
A Prime Location
His Malibu beachfront house is one of the most famous properties in Leonardo DiCaprio's real estate portfolio. Situated in the exclusive Carbon Beach. also known as "Billionaire's Beach," this property boasts stunning ocean views and private beach access. The "Leonardo DiCaprio house" in Malibu is a testament to the actor's love for the sea and his penchant for luxurious living.
Architectural Highlights
The Malibu house features a modern design with clean lines, large windows. and open spaces blending indoor and outdoor living. The expansive deck and patio areas provide ample space for entertaining guests or enjoying a quiet sunset. The house has state-of-the-art amenities. including a gourmet kitchen, a home theatre, and many guest suites.
Sustainable Features
Leonardo DiCaprio is a well-known environmental activist. whose Malibu house reflects his commitment to sustainability. The property incorporates solar panels, energy-efficient appliances, and sustainable building materials. The landscaping around the house is also designed to be water-efficient. featuring drought-resistant plants and intelligent irrigation systems.
Leonardo DiCaprio House: Hollywood Hills Hideaway
Privacy and Seclusion
Another remarkable property in Leonardo DiCaprio's collection is his Hollywood Hills house. This secluded retreat offers privacy and tranquility. making it an ideal escape from the hustle and bustle of Los Angeles. The "Leonardo DiCaprio house" in Hollywood Hills nestled among lush greenery. and offers panoramic views of the city and surrounding landscapes.
Design and Amenities
The Hollywood Hills house is a mid-century modern gem characterized by its sleek design and floor-to-ceiling windows. The open-concept living space is perfect for entertaining. while the cozy bedrooms provide a comfortable retreat. The property also features a swimming pool, and outdoor dining area. and a spacious deck that overlooks the cityscape.
Environmental Initiatives
The Hollywood Hills house incorporates several green features that are in line with DiCaprio's environmental values. The home has solar panels, energy-efficient lighting, and a rainwater harvesting system. Additionally, the landscaping designed to support local wildlife and promote
The Evolution of the Leonardo DiCaprio Haircut: A Journey Through Style and C...greendigital
Leonardo DiCaprio, a name synonymous with Hollywood stardom and acting excellence. has captivated audiences for decades with his talent and charisma. But, the Leonardo DiCaprio haircut is one aspect of his public persona that has garnered attention. From his early days as a teenage heartthrob to his current status as a seasoned actor and environmental activist. DiCaprio's hairstyles have evolved. reflecting both his personal growth and the changing trends in fashion. This article delves into the many phases of the Leonardo DiCaprio haircut. exploring its significance and impact on pop culture.
Unveiling Paul Haggis Shaping Cinema Through Diversity. .pdfkenid14983
Paul Haggis is undoubtedly a visionary filmmaker whose work has not only shaped cinema but has also pushed boundaries when it comes to diversity and representation within the industry. From his thought-provoking scripts to his engaging directorial style, Haggis has become a prominent figure in the world of film.
From Teacher to OnlyFans: Brianna Coppage's Story at 28get joys
At 28, Brianna Coppage left her teaching career to become an OnlyFans content creator. This bold move into digital entrepreneurship allowed her to harness her creativity and build a new identity. Brianna's experience highlights the intersection of technology and personal branding in today's economy.
Everything You Need to Know About IPTV Ireland.pdfXtreame HDTV
The way we consume television has evolved dramatically over the past decade. Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional cable and satellite TV, offering a wide range of channels and on-demand content via the internet. In Ireland, IPTV is rapidly gaining traction, with Xtreame HDTV being one of the prominent providers in the market. This comprehensive guide will delve into everything you need to know about IPTV Ireland, focusing on Xtreame HDTV, its features, benefits, and how it is revolutionizing TV viewing for Irish audiences.
The Unbelievable Tale of Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping: A Riveting Sagagreendigital
Introduction
The notion of Dwayne Johnson kidnapping seems straight out of a Hollywood thriller. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, known for his larger-than-life persona, immense popularity. and action-packed filmography, is the last person anyone would envision being a victim of kidnapping. Yet, the bizarre and riveting tale of such an incident, filled with twists and turns. has captured the imagination of many. In this article, we delve into the intricate details of this astonishing event. exploring every aspect, from the dramatic rescue operation to the aftermath and the lessons learned.
Follow us on: Pinterest
The Origins of the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping Saga
Dwayne Johnson: A Brief Background
Before discussing the specifics of the kidnapping. it is crucial to understand who Dwayne Johnson is and why his kidnapping would be so significant. Born May 2, 1972, Dwayne Douglas Johnson is an American actor, producer, businessman. and former professional wrestler. Known by his ring name, "The Rock," he gained fame in the World Wrestling Federation (WWF, now WWE) before transitioning to a successful career in Hollywood.
Johnson's filmography includes blockbuster hits such as "The Fast and the Furious" series, "Jumanji," "Moana," and "San Andreas." His charismatic personality, impressive physique. and action-star status have made him a beloved figure worldwide. Thus, the news of his kidnapping would send shockwaves across the globe.
Setting the Scene: The Day of the Kidnapping
The incident of Dwayne Johnson's kidnapping began on an ordinary day. Johnson was filming his latest high-octane action film set to break box office records. The location was a remote yet scenic area. chosen for its rugged terrain and breathtaking vistas. perfect for the film's climactic scenes.
But, beneath the veneer of normalcy, a sinister plot was unfolding. Unbeknownst to Johnson and his team, a group of criminals had planned his abduction. hoping to leverage his celebrity status for a hefty ransom. The stage was set for an event that would soon dominate worldwide headlines and social media feeds.
The Abduction: Unfolding the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping
The Moment of Capture
On the day of the kidnapping, everything seemed to be proceeding as usual on set. Johnson and his co-stars and crew were engrossed in shooting a particularly demanding scene. As the day wore on, the production team took a short break. providing the kidnappers with the perfect opportunity to strike.
The abduction was executed with military precision. A group of masked men, armed and organized, infiltrated the set. They created chaos, taking advantage of the confusion to isolate Johnson. Johnson was outnumbered and caught off guard despite his formidable strength and fighting skills. The kidnappers overpowered him, bundled him into a waiting vehicle. and sped away, leaving everyone on set in a state of shock and disbelief.
The Immediate Aftermath
The immediate aftermath of the Dwayne Johnson kidnappin
Modern Radio Frequency Access Control Systems: The Key to Efficiency and SafetyAITIX LLC
Today's fast-paced environment worries companies of all sizes about efficiency and security. Businesses are constantly looking for new and better solutions to solve their problems, whether it's data security or facility access. RFID for access control technologies have revolutionized this.
Christian Louboutin: Innovating with Red Solesget joys
Christian Louboutin is celebrated for his innovative approach to footwear design, marked by his trademark red soles. This in-depth look at his life and career explores the origins of his creativity, the milestones in his journey, and the impact of his work on the fashion industry. Learn how Louboutin's bold vision and dedication to excellence have made his brand synonymous with luxury and style.
At Digidev, we are working to be the leader in interactive streaming platforms of choice by smart device users worldwide.
Our goal is to become the ultimate distribution service of entertainment content. The Digidev application will offer the next generation television highway for users to discover and engage in a variety of content. While also providing a fresh and
innovative approach towards advertainment with vast revenue opportunities. Designed and developed by Joe Q. Bretz
Top IPTV UK Providers of A Comprehensive Review.pdfXtreame HDTV
The television landscape in the UK has evolved significantly with the rise of Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). IPTV offers a modern alternative to traditional cable and satellite TV, allowing viewers to stream live TV, on-demand videos, and other multimedia content directly to their devices over the internet. This review provides an in-depth look at the top IPTV UK providers, their features, pricing, and what sets them apart.
3. ENDING THE TOBACCO EPIDEMIC
Progress Towards A Healthier Nation
August 2012
4. Suggested Citation:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Ending the Tobacco Epidemic: Progress
Toward a Healthier Nation. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, August 2012.
To access this publication online, please go to http://www.hhs.gov/ash/initiatives/tobacco/.
5. Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Tobacco Control High-Priority Performance Goal 2
Challenges: The Burden of Tobacco Use and Barriers to Progress 3
Setting the Stage for a New Tobacco Strategic Action Plan 5
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 5
Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act 5
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act 6
Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act 7
The Affordable Care Act 7
Confronting the Epidemic: Transforming Vision Into Action 8
Leading by Example: Leveraging HHS Systems and Resources
to Create a Society Free From Tobacco-Related Death and Disease 8
Improving the Public’s Health: Strengthening the Implementation
of Evidence-Based Interventions and Policies in States and Communities 10
Engaging the Public: Changing Social Norms Around Tobacco Use 18
Advancing Knowledge: Accelerating Research
to Expand the Science Base and Monitor Progress 20
Toward a Society Free From Tobacco-Related Death and Disease 25
Appendix A: Tracking Progress Toward the Healthy People Objectives 27
Adult Smoking Prevalence 27
Adolescent Tobacco Use 28
Smoking Initiation 29
Attempts to Quit 31
Exposure to Secondhand Smoke 32
Appendix B: List of Acronyms 33
References 34
6.
7. Introduction
The United States has made historic progress in combating the epidemic of tobacco-caused
illness and death since the landmark 1964 Surgeon General’s Report on the health effects
of cigarette smoking. Because of this, many mistakenly assume that future advances will be
assured. In 2009, recognizing that declines in smoking prevalence had stalled, Secretary of
Health and Human Services (HHS) Kathleen Sebelius directed HHS to develop a Depart-
ment-wide strategic action plan for tobacco control to accelerate progress in combating the
tobacco epidemic. A working group of public health experts across HHS was convened to
develop Ending the Tobacco Epidemic: A Tobacco Control Strategic Action Plan for the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (hereafter referred to as the Strategic Action Plan,
or the Plan) (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010a).
Published in November 2010, the Strategic Action Plan mobilizes HHS tobacco control
resources toward the bold vision of a society free from tobacco-related death and disease and
provides a framework for coordinating tobacco control efforts across the Department and
the nation. The Strategic Action Plan prescribes proven, practical, achievable actions that can
be implemented at the federal, state, and community levels. It sets forth the most effective
evidence-based and evidence-informed approaches that will enable HHS to build on recent
legislative milestones, respond to the changing market for tobacco products, and promote
robust tobacco control programs at the federal, state, and community levels.
The Strategic Action Plan charts a framework designed to achieve four central tobacco-related
objectives of Healthy People 2020 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010b):
• Reduce tobacco use by adults and adolescents
• Reduce the initiation of tobacco use among children, adolescents, and young adults
• Increase smoking cessation success by adult smokers
• Reduce the proportion of nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke
The Plan also directs that future activities focus on accomplishing specific objectives in four
major action areas:
• Leading by example
• Improving the public’s health
• Engaging the public
• Advancing knowledge
In 2011, a newly established HHS Tobacco Control Implementation Steering Committee
comprising senior HHS leaders and tobacco control experts and chaired by Assistant
Secretary for Health Howard K. Koh, MD, MPH, began monitoring the overall implemen
tation of the Strategic Action Plan to ensure effective coordination and collaboration across
the Department and with other federal agencies and to provide support to the Food and
Drug Administration’s role of regulating tobacco products. The Steering Committee meets
regularly to set priorities, develop plans for cross-agency implementation of strategic actions,
and promote information exchange and collaboration.
1
8. This report, Ending the Tobacco Epidemic: Progress Toward a Healthier Nation, fulfills the
recommendation put forth by the Strategic Action Plan for periodic reports that document
progress in implementing the specific actions in the Plan and ultimately achieving the
Healthy People 2020 objectives.
Tobacco Control High-Priority Performance Goal
In 2011, the Office of Management and Budget asked federal Departments to commit
to ambitious goals that stimulate innovation. These priority goals would be attained within
an 18- to 24-month time frame.
The following tobacco control objective was selected as one of HHS’s priority goals:
By December 31, 2013, reduce annual adults’ cigarette consumption in the United States from
1,281 cigarettes per capita to 1,062 cigarettes per capita. This would represent a 17.1% decrease
from the 2010 baseline of 1,281 cigarettes per capita.
In the United States, per-capita cigarette consumption data, which reflect cigarettes legally
purchased for domestic consumption, are available as far back as the late 1800s. Per-capita
cigarette consumption is a key measure that has been used by researchers in the United States
and other countries to objectively measure cigarette use and the impact of tobacco control
over time. The Steering Committee is coordinating the actions necessary to achieve this goal,
and data confirm that the priority goal intermediate target for 2011—1,232 cigarettes per
capita—was achieved.
2
9. Challenges: The Burden of Tobacco Use
and Barriers to Progress
One hundred years ago, tobacco use was not a significant cause of illness or death in the
United States. In fact, lung cancer was almost nonexistent a century ago; it now ranks as the
leading cause of cancer death in the United States for both men and women, with more than
80% caused by smoking (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008).
Smoking kills an estimated 443,000 Americans each year, with 50,000 of these deaths from
exposure to secondhand smoke (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008). Almost
one in five adults smoke—45 million altogether—along with one in five high school seniors
(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2012a). Their prognosis is grim. Half
of the adults who continue to smoke will die from smoking-related causes (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2008). Many who comprise the other half will suffer from
cancer, stroke, heart attack, and other serious tobacco-related diseases. Users of other tobacco
products, such as smokeless tobacco and cigars, also suffer from significant adverse health
consequences, such as cancer and heart disease.
Nonsmoking Americans are also affected by tobacco use. Approximately 88 million non
smokers, or 40% of the nonsmoking U.S. public, continue to be exposed to secondhand
smoke (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010a). Because even brief exposure
to secondhand smoke can be harmful, many nonsmokers are at risk of developing smoking-
related illnesses, and many will get sick or die prematurely from cancer or heart disease
as a result (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008).
Moreover, the financial burden imposed by cigarette smoking is enormous. Smoking-related
illness in the United States costs $96 billion each year in medical costs and $97 billion in lost
productivity due to premature mortality (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008),
and the human toll on survivors and caregivers of individuals affected by tobacco-related
illness is incalculable.
In addition, there is a growing concern about new tobacco products being marketed to
smokers and nonsmokers as alternatives for use in smoke-free environments. Dual use of cig
arettes and smokeless tobacco can sustain tobacco addiction, encouraging continued tobacco
use among smokers who might otherwise quit. And the marketing of smokeless tobacco and
new purported reduced-risk products may increase overall tobacco use. Consumer misper
ceptions regarding the “safety” of the use of these products, independently and concurrently
with smoking, pose an ongoing challenge to tobacco prevention and control efforts.
The tobacco industry continues to aggressively promote tobacco use and fuel addiction
among consumers. Cigarette manufacturers spend $9.94 billion each year, or $27 million
each day, on advertising and promotions to attract new youthful users, retain current
users, increase consumption, and generate favorable attitudes toward tobacco use and
tobacco manufacturers. Of this amount, 72% is spent on providing discounts to make
cigarettes more affordable, increasing initiation and consumption. Data also demonstrate that
the depiction of cigarette smoking in movies continues to glamorize its use for young people
and substantially increases smoking initiation by youth (U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, 2012a).
3
10. In response, the U.S. government, along with states and localities, has worked hard to reduce
tobacco use over the last 50 years. The federal government has a) documented the lethal and
addictive nature of tobacco products, b) supported state and community tobacco control
efforts, c) required cigarette and smokeless tobacco products to carry warning labels, d)
banned certain tobacco advertisements from television and radio, e) banned smoking from
air travel, f) worked to educate the public about the lethal nature of secondhand smoke
exposure, and g) supported education and research initiatives to prevent tobacco use and
facilitate quitting.
The United States has made historic progress in combatting tobacco-related death and
disease. Since the release of the first Surgeon General’s Report on tobacco use in 1964, adult
smoking rates in the United States have been cut in half (from 42.4% in 1965 to 20.9%
in 2005). Despite this progress, tobacco use remains the leading cause of premature and
preventable death in our society. The prevalence of current cigarette smoking among U.S.
adults aged 18 years and older declined only slightly between 2005 and 2010—from 20.9%
to 19.3%; however, even this small reduction in the smoking rate resulted in approximately
3 million fewer smokers, which over time will avert as many as 1.5 million premature deaths
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a). These efforts need to be expanded and
sustained if we are to achieve our Healthy People 2020 objectives for tobacco use.
4
11. Setting the Stage for a New Tobacco
Strategic Action Plan
To strengthen and accelerate the nation’s efforts to combat the tobacco epidemic, in 2009
and 2010, President Obama signed into law five new measures that provide critical tools for
protecting Americans from the dangers of tobacco. These laws individually and collectively
provide historic new opportunities to ameliorate the harm caused by tobacco. They also set
the stage for a new national strategic planning effort for tobacco control. As described here,
these new laws have given federal agencies more authority and funding to a) restrict the sale,
distribution, and promotion of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to make them less accessible
and attractive to youth; b) deter people from smoking; c) help people quit; d) reduce exposure
to secondhand smoke; and e) promote an overall culture of health and prevention. In short,
these laws form an essential foundation for the successful launch and implementation of the
Strategic Action Plan.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
In February 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act (ARRA), also known as the Stimulus or Recovery Act. ARRA, an economic recovery
package, invested $200 million to support local, state, and national tobacco prevention and
control efforts, thus mitigating decreases in state tobacco control budgets. With this funding,
HHS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched the Communities
Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) program, which provided grants to help states, cities,
counties, and tribes address the ongoing public health challenges; 22 grants addressed
tobacco use specifically.
Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act
In February 2009, President Obama signed into law the Children’s Health Insurance
Program Reauthorization Act, which included an unprecedented 62-cent increase in the
federal excise tax on cigarettes to $1.01 per pack. For every 10% increase in the price
of tobacco products, consumption falls by approximately 4% overall, with a greater reduction
among youth. This single act by Congress—increasing the price of cigarettes—is projected
to prevent more than 2 million children from initiating smoking, cause more than one
million adult smokers to quit, avert nearly 900,000 smoking-attributed deaths, and avoid
$44.5 billion in long-term health care costs (Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, 2009).
5
12. 6
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act
In June 2009, President Obama signed into law the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco
Control Act (hereafter referred to as the Tobacco Control Act), thereby granting the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to comprehensively regulate thousands
of tobacco products for the first time in history. This law facilitated the creation of the Center
for Tobacco Products (CTP) to regulate the manufacture, distribution, and marketing
of tobacco products to protect public health. Recognizing that most new users of tobacco
products are younger than 18 years of age—the minimum legal age to purchase these
products nationally and in most states—and that many new users will become addicted
before they are old enough to understand the risks, parts of the act focus on reducing use
by youth. The Tobacco Control Act also requires that as of September 2012, cigarette
packages have larger and bolder health warnings, including graphic images (implementation
of this provision is currently enjoined by a pending lawsuit brought by tobacco companies).
In addition, the Tobacco Control Act mandates that tobacco companies disclose harmful
or potentially harmful constituents in their products. Similarly, it prohibits false or misleading
labeling and advertising for tobacco products and requires the tobacco industry to submit
an application to CTP for new products or products with modified risk claims.
Importantly, the act gives CTP the authority to set standards for tobacco products that are
appropriate for the protection of public health. Successful development of these standards
will be informed by a strong science base. With support and guidance from FDA’s Tobacco
Products Scientific Advisory Committee as well as from the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Health, CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration, CTP is carefully researching what actions are appropriate for
the protection of public health.
Cigarette Prices and Cigarette Sales, United States, 1970-2010
13. Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking
(PACT) Act to reduce the illegal sale and transport of cigarettes and other tobacco products.
The PACT Act will reduce and prevent smoking by blocking access to underpriced and
untaxed cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products. It will help curtail online and mail order
sales to underage youth by requiring sellers to verify a customer’s age prior to sale by checking
databases. The delivery service must also check the age and identification of the person
accepting a package containing cigarettes or smokeless tobacco products. This law will help
the government collect more than $5 billion a year in lost revenue from online and mail
order cigarette sales (Quick, 2011). It also sets a new precedent by applying the same age
verification and reporting requirements to online tobacco sellers in tribal lands, where 20%
of all online tobacco sellers in the United States are located (Campaign for Tobacco-Free
Kids, 2010).
The Affordable Care Act
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (hereafter referred to as the Affordable Care Act). As part of its emphasis on prevention
and health promotion, the law a) requires private insurance plans to cover tobacco cessation
treatments, including medications that help people quit smoking; b) expands smoking
cessation coverage for pregnant women who receive Medicaid; and c) provides Medicare
beneficiaries with an annual wellness visit that includes personalized prevention plan
services that may include referrals for tobacco cessation services. The Affordable Care Act also
established the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which represents the most significant
investment in U.S. history to scale up and promote effective public health and preventive
measures, including programs to prevent and reduce tobacco use. Through this fund, the
United States will invest mandated funds in prevention efforts every year (U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, 2012b). HHS distributed $500 million from the fund
in fiscal year (FY) 2010, $750 million in FY 2011, and $1 billion in FY 2012 to target four
priorities: community prevention, clinical prevention, public health infrastructure, and
research and tracking. In addition, the Affordable Care Act created the National Prevention,
Health Promotion, and Public Health Council (National Prevention Council) and called for
the development of the National Prevention Strategy to realize the benefits of prevention
for all Americans’ health. Tobacco control is one of the National Prevention Strategy’s key
priorities. The National Prevention Council has identified specific areas in which prevention
can be accelerated through the combined efforts of all 17 National Prevention Council
departments. One of these areas is a commitment to increase tobacco-free environments
within National Prevention Council departments and encourage partners to do so volun
tarily, as appropriate.
7
14. Confronting the Epidemic:
Transforming Vision Into Action
In the year following publication of the Strategic Action Plan, HHS achieved measurable
success in transforming goals into action. This section provides details about significant
strides that have been made in all four major action areas.
Leading by Example: Leveraging HHS Systems and Resources
to Create a Society Free From Tobacco-Related Death and Disease
One way for HHS to achieve its vision of change is to set a strong, clear example. HHS has
now implemented its own model tobacco control policies to protect employees, contractors,
and visitors against exposure to secondhand smoke; help employees quit tobacco use; and use
federal programs to expand the delivery of tobacco control programs and cessation services
to millions of Americans. HHS has also sought to create synergy by collaborating with other
federal agencies, nongovernmental organizations, state and local leaders, business interests,
and the international community in support of tobacco control and prevention initiatives.
HHS Establishes a Tobacco-Free Campus
In July 2011, HHS expanded its existing smoke-free policy to protect the health of its
employees, contractors, and visitors by prohibiting the use of any tobacco products at all
of its facilities under direct HHS control—within buildings as well as in outdoor spaces,
parking lots, private vehicles on the premises, and government vehicles—regardless of loca
tion. The tobacco-free policy covers cigarettes, cigars, pipes, smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes,
and all other tobacco combustible and noncombustible products. As a key action step of the
HHS Strategic Action Plan, this policy projects a positive, pro-health message and is intended
to encourage similar policies in all workplaces.
In addition to implementing its comprehensive tobacco-free campus policy, HHS is working
to ensure that its conferences take place only in states and localities that have laws making
private workplaces and restaurants smoke-free. The National Cancer Institute (NCI), National
Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have led the way, con
vening their events only in the 31 states and the many other cities and counties that currently
have adopted laws making private workplaces and restaurants smoke-free (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a).
HHS Collaborates With the Office of Personnel Management to Help More
Employees Become Tobacco-Free
In addition to strengthening its own workplace policies, HHS is collaborating with other
federal departments on tobacco control activities across the federal government. One
notable success is that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) now ensures that all
federal employees have access to robust cessation treatments consistent with the 2008 U.S.
Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline, Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence
(Fiore et al., 2008). Specifically, with HHS support and technical guidance, OPM adopted
a groundbreaking new policy: starting in 2011, it expanded tobacco cessation treatment
coverage under the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB) program for all current and
retired full-time federal employees and their dependents. FEHB covers approximately 2 mil
lion federal employees, of whom an estimated 18% were smokers as of 2008–2009, as well as
8
15. 6 million dependents and retirees whose smoking prevalence is unknown (U.S. Office of Per
sonnel Management, 2012). As part of the new policy, FEHB plans now cover four annual
telephone, group, or individual counseling sessions and access to all FDA-approved tobacco
cessation medications. These services and medications require no copayments or coinsurance
and are not subject to deductibles or annual or lifetime dollar limits. By providing these
comprehensive tobacco cessation services without barriers, the federal government increases
the productivity of its workers, protects both their health and that of their families, and also
reduces the taxpayer dollars needed to treat tobacco-related illnesses in the future. Based on a
recent survey of plans, OPM estimates that 100,000 tobacco users were prescribed cessation
medications and/or had cessation counseling in the first year of the benefit.
HHS Launches Initiative to Support the Adoption
of Tobacco-Free Policies by Colleges and Universities
In 2011, HHS created its Tobacco-Free College Campus Initiative to promote and support
the adoption and implementation of tobacco-free policies at universities, colleges, and other
institutions of higher learning across the United States. Advertising, marketing, and promo
tion of tobacco products have been strategically designed by the tobacco industry to attract
young people. HHS has enlisted the participation of leaders at academic institutions with
tobacco- or smoke-free campus policies to counter these efforts. Supported by HHS, these
academic champions—themselves leading by example—planned multiple events for 2012,
including education and training sessions at the National Conference on Tobacco or Health
to take the tobacco-free academia message to their peers and prepare public health advocates
and others to effectively promote tobacco- or smoke-free campus policies across the
nation. Prior to the launch of this initiative, approximately 775 colleges and universities
had implemented 100% smoke-free campus policies (American Nonsmokers’ Rights
Foundation, 2012). Collectively, these institutions are accelerating the momentum for
increasing the number of tobacco- and smoke-free campuses and the number of students,
faculty, and staff covered nationwide. Also of note, the City University of New York (CUNY)
garnered widespread attention in early 2011 when it adopted a smoke-free campus policy
that applies to almost half a million students and more than 20,000 faculty across CUNY’s
23 campuses (City University of New York, 2011). Their comprehensive policy takes effect
in September 2012.
Also, funds received from CDC’s Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW)
program have helped a number of academic institutions develop comprehensive tobacco-
and smoke-free policies, including seven community colleges in Chicago, eight community
colleges in St. Louis, and the CUNY system.
9
16. HHS Partners With Employers to Launch a Smoke-Free Worksite Challenge
The benefits of employers going smoke-free are tremendous. The Task Force on Community
Preventive Services concluded that smoke-free workplace policies are associated with a 6.4%
increase in cessation and 3.4% decrease in tobacco use prevalence (Task Force on Communi
ty Preventive Services, 2012). Cessation has been shown to lead to reduced medical costs and
increased worker productivity. Additionally, nonsmokers are no longer exposed to the hazards
of secondhand smoke.
In September 2011, at the United Nations High-level Meeting on the Prevention and Con
trol of Non-communicable Diseases, HHS’s Assistant Secretary for Health introduced the
Global Smoke-Free Worksite Challenge, a global multisector partnership comprising private-
sector companies, nongovernmental organizations, and governments whose goal is to totally
eliminate smoking and tobacco smoke at the worksite and ensure that every worker is pro
tected from exposure to secondhand smoke.
The Global Smoke-Free Worksite Challenge represents a collaboration among HHS, the
American Cancer Society, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Edelman, the Global Busi
ness Coalition on Health, Johnson & Johnson, the World Heart Federation, and the Mayo
Clinic with support from the World Health Organization. The Global Smoke-Free Worksite
Challenge is a 2011 Clinton Global Initiative “Commitment to Action.” The partnership
has begun to work with governments, global corporations, hospitals, and nongovernmental
organizations who are interested in committing to the challenge of becoming a 100% smoke-
free worksite. HHS has set a goal of recruiting six partner countries to participate by the end
of 2012.
Improving the Public’s Health: Strengthening the Implementation
of Evidence-Based Interventions and Policies in States and Communities
State and Local Initiatives Prevent Tobacco-Related Illness and Save Lives
Much of the burden of tobacco-related illness can be reduced with approaches that incorporate
proven, evidence-based, and affordable population-wide measures.
Some of the most effective tobacco control programs start at a smaller scale as states and
communities take action to reduce tobacco consumption and decrease health care costs. For
example, in California, home to the nation’s longest-running tobacco control program, the
adult smoking rate has declined by nearly 50%, with the number of cigarettes smoked per
person decreasing by 67% since the state began its tobacco control program in 1988. During
the program’s first 15 years, California saved $86 billion in health care costs by spending $1.8
billion on tobacco control, resulting in a 50:1 return on investment (Lightwood, Dinno,
& Glantz, 2008). Additionally, as a result of program-related reductions in smoking, lung
cancer incidence has declined four times faster in California compared with the rest of the
nation (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007).
Based on this example and others, the federal government has supported state tobacco control
programs for many years, with CDC recently also promoting grants for cities and counties
to implement evidence-based tobacco control measures.
10
17. Through its National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP), CDC supports coordinated,
evidence-based tobacco control efforts and interventions across the country to reduce
tobacco use. CDC funds all 50 states, the District of Columbia, 8 U.S. territories, 8 tribal
support centers, and 6 national networks. The funding leverages significant state investments
to implement comprehensive, evidence-based tobacco control interventions and to reduce
morbidity and mortality as well as tobacco-related disparities.
In the last 2 years, HHS has used both the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) and the Prevention and Public Health Fund, created through the Affordable Care
Act, to make important strategic investments in promoting public health prevention. These
new opportunities invest in effective strategies to prevent tobacco-related death and disease.
Federal Grants Build Healthier Communities: The HHS Communities Putting
Prevention to Work and Community Transformation Grants Programs Combat Tobacco
Use in Localities and States
Treating cancer, lung and heart disease, and other chronic illnesses resulting from tobacco use
is responsible for 8% of total health care expenditures in the United States—approximately
$96 billion each year (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008). In contrast, stud
ies have consistently demonstrated that relatively small investments in preventive health
programs lead to enormous savings in future health care costs (Trust for America’s Health,
2009). As previously noted, in 2009, HHS directed $200 million from ARRA to launch
CPPW. CPPW provides resources to local communities to reduce tobacco use and obe
sity; 22 cities and counties received funds to implement evidence-based strategies to reduce
tobacco use. Each community developed its own specific approach, designed to produce
documented results and to be replicable in other localities and states.
CPPW-funded tobacco control programs have provided tools, education, and information
explaining the improvements in public health to be derived from the adoption of smoke-
free and tobacco-free policies for multiunit housing settings, college campuses, local school
districts, and outdoor spaces and for implementing health care system changes related to
tobacco use screening, documentation, and cessation treatment.
CPPW Success Stories: Adoption of Tobacco-Free Policies
in School Districts
CPPW funds have supported efforts to make schools tobacco-free
• Florence, SC – Four public school districts passed comprehensive tobacco-free policies,
protecting 18,700 students and 2,500 staff in 30 schools
• Archdiocese of Chicago – The Chicago Catholic schools adopted a tobacco-free campus
policy in 137 schools, protecting an estimated 40,000 students and 2,500 faculty and staff
• Cherokee Nation – All schools and child care facilities now prohibit tobacco use at all
times in school buildings, on school grounds, in school vehicles, at school functions, and
at offsite school events
• St Louis, MO – Rockwood School District, the largest in St Louis County (with more
than 25 schools, 22,500 students, and 3,300 employees), adopted a comprehensive
tobacco-free policy
11
18. Cppw Success Stories: Adoption of Smoke-Free
Multiunit Housing Policies
CPPW funds have supported efforts of communities to adopt smoke-free housing policies and
helped people find smoke-free homes
• Boston, MA – In May 2011, seven multifamily housing providers implemented smoke-
free policies, directly affecting more than 3,000 affordable and market-rate units
• Chicago, IL – By March 2012, four Chicago Housing Authority sites had implemented
smoke-free housing policies, affecting 367 public units The Chicago Tobacco Prevention
Project has 211 private housing units that are committed to going smoke-free, with an
ultimate goal of 1,000 units going smoke-free
• Santa Clara County, CA – The county adopted a policy requiring that all multiunit
housing be smoke-free, including public housing This policy covers unincorporated areas
of the county, and after full implementation will impact 1,328 existing units occupied
by more than 3,300 residents
Cppw Success Stories: Integration of Tobacco Use Screening,
Documentation, and Cessation Treatment Referral Into
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities
CPPW funds have supported efforts to enhance tobacco prevention and cessation efforts in mental
health treatment settings
• Austin, TX – The Seton Family of Hospitals, Central Health, and CommUnityCare
Clinics implemented a screening protocol for assessing tobacco use and referring patients
to cessation services and integrated this protocol into their electronic medical record
systems This new policy reaches 1 8 million patients in 11 counties
• State of Utah – The State Department of Health is facilitating staff training, resource
development, and tobacco-free policies to reduce tobacco use among patients and staff
at treatment centers
• New York, NY – The New York Health Department provided training to help 44 Assertive
Community Treatment teams and staff at 160 Supportive Housing units integrate tobacco
dependence treatment into care given to clients with severe mental illness
As part of CPPW, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health awarded grants to 10
national organizations to support CPPW community outcomes. Included in these grants
were three national organizations to support tobacco prevention and control outcomes in 18
CPPW communities: the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Lung Association, and
Society for Public Health Education. In the first year of the grant, these organizations pro
vided more than 170 sessions of peer-to-peer technical assistance and 64 products, including
issue briefs, Webinars, and roundtables.
12
19. To build on the successful CPPW effort, in September 2011, CDC awarded more than $100
million in prevention funding through a new program called Community Transformation
Grants (CTGs), funded by the Prevention and Public Health Fund. CTGs are now helping
states, communities, and tribes across the nation implement tobacco control programs and
other wellness initiatives that promote healthy lifestyles and reduce the incidence of prevent
able disease. Again, by financing proven prevention programs, the CTG program is improving
not only public health but also the nation’s economic well-being (Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2011b).
FDA Implements Regulations to Reduce Youth Access to Tobacco Products
FDA contracts with states to conduct federal compliance check inspections of tobacco retail
ers. These retail inspections focus on ensuring compliance with the Tobacco Control Act and
FDA regulations at retail locations. FDA awarded contracts to 15 states in 2010 and to 37
states as well as the District of Columbia in 2011, infusing $33 million into these communi
ties. These contracts enable FDA to conduct compliance check inspections at retail locations
to ensure compliance with the law, including a) age and ID verification, b) requirements for
labeling and advertising of smokeless tobacco products, c) restrictions on the sale of single
cigarettes, d) a ban on certain candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes, and e) prohibition of
the use of self-service displays and vending machines in retail establishments where minors
are present or permitted to enter. As of June 1, 2012, FDA has conducted almost 70,000
retail inspections and issued nearly 3,000 warning letters to retailers, the majority of which
include violations relating to selling tobacco to minors. Awarding additional contracts in
2012, including contracts with territories, will facilitate FDA’s progress on its goal to contract
with every state and U.S. territory to assist FDA with tobacco retail inspection efforts and
ultimately reduce tobacco use among all Americans and particularly youth (Food and Drug
Administration, 2012).
13
20. SAMHSA’s Synar Program Works to Reduce Youth Access to Tobacco
SAMHSA implements the Synar program; the Synar amendment and its implementing
regulation require the 50 states, District of Columbia, and 8 U.S. territories (as a condition
of receipt of their full Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant awards)
to enact and enforce state laws prohibiting tobacco sales to youth. FDA works closely with
SAMHSA to ensure that these regulations work together with SAMHSA’s efforts to reduce
youth access to tobacco under the Synar program to help reach the shared goal of reducing
youth access to, and use of, tobacco products. In 2011, the average national retailer violation
rate of tobacco sales to youth was 8.5%, the lowest level in the history of the program
(Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2012).
HHS Strategic Action Plan Helps People Quit
HHS has implemented a coordinated Department-wide tobacco-use cessation strategy.
This strategy includes increasing insurance coverage for cessation services, media and educa
tion on the benefits of quitting, and support for the national quitline network.
Insurance coverage of services
to treat tobacco use signifi-
Quitline Facts (McKay & Kesmodel, 2011)
cantly reduces use of tobacco
• In 2010, quitlines served approximately
products. For example, in
478,000 smokers, including 170,000
2006, Massachusetts pro-
Medicaid beneficiaries
vided comprehensive to
bacco cessation coverage for • State and federal quitline program funding
all Medicaid beneficiaries. totaled $114 million in 2011
Smoking prevalence among
Medicaid enrollees dropped
from 38% to 28%, reducing
hospitalizations for cardiovascular events by nearly 50% (Land et al., 2010). Within 2 years,
Massachusetts realized an estimated total savings of more than $10 million, representing
a return on investment of $3 for every $1 spent. If this program were implemented in every
state, it is estimated that the Medicaid program would save $2.4 billion within 5 years
(Richard, West, & Ku, 2012).
By making key modifications to agency policies, HHS has significantly increased direct
assistance to consumers who want to quit using tobacco.
The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is the primary federal agency for
improving access to health care services for people who are uninsured, isolated, or medically
vulnerable. As a result of the HHS Strategic Action Plan, HRSA has designated tobacco con
trol as an agency priority. In 2011, HRSA began requiring all of its 1,100 Health Center Pro
gram grantees to report on measures for tobacco screening and cessation counseling. In order
to improve clinical performance on these measures, HRSA has implemented several pro
grams to support clinicians.The Center for Integrated Health Solutions, a joint SAMHSA
HRSA cooperative agreement to integrate behavioral health and primary care, offered two
national Webinars on tobacco cessation for health centers and community behavioral health
centers. Area Health Education Centers that partner academic institutions with community-
based health care organizations provided educational activities addressing tobacco cessation
and prevention services. The 340B Drug Pricing Program continues to provide discounted
medications for tobacco cessation.14
21. Medicare and Medicaid Expand Tobacco Cessation Coverage
In August 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that
administers Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program, expanded its
coverage of tobacco cessation counseling to include Medicare beneficiaries who use tobacco
but who did not have signs or symptoms of tobacco-related disease. As a result of these
changes and prior Medicare Part D legislation covering FDA-approved cessation pharmaco
therapies, all Medicare patients now have coverage for tobacco cessation.
Similarly, Medicaid coverage has been expanded to include full cessation support for preg
nant women (pregnancy may be a period of high motivation for maternal smoking cessa
tion), and it reimburses states for 50% of the cost of providing telephone quitline support
to callers covered by Medicaid. As a result of the latter policy, over the next 10 years,
approximately 2.5 million additional smokers are expected to use quitlines and related
services(North American Quitline Consortium, 2010).Since this policy went into effect in
June, 2011, six states (Maryland, Massachusetts, Louisiana, Montana, North Carolina, and
Oklahoma) have executed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with their state Medic
aid agencies to obtain the federal match. Another four states (Arizona, California, Colorado,
and Delaware) are close to having such MOUs in place.
Quitlines Improve Access to Cessation
Quitlines are an important cessation resource for lowering the burden of tobacco use in the
United States. Quitlines provide telephone-based support to help tobacco users quit. This
support includes counseling, medications, Web-based information, referral to community
resources, and self-help materials. Research has found that quitlines are effective with diverse
populations and have broad reach (Fiore et al., 2008).
The National Network of Tobacco Cessation Quitlines, which is a collaborative effort
between CDC, NCI, and states and which is funded through NTCP and states, makes free
telephone cessation counseling available in the United States. Every state has its own quit-
line. CDC, through additional funds provided by the Affordable Care Act, provides funds to
states to expand or enhance existing services. These enhanced services may include expand
ing hours of operation, offering services in additional languages, and providing callers with
additional counseling sessions and free nicotine replacement therapy. Funding has also been
used to promote state quitlines to increase the number of smokers reached, often with a focus
on underserved populations with higher smoking rates. Most significantly, the 1-800-QUIT
NOW number was included in CDC’s national tobacco education campaign, Tips From
Former Smokers. This provided a direct point of support for people to quit tobacco use.
Innovative Mobile and Social Media Initiatives Make Quitting Easier
HHS cessation promotion efforts include new innovations designed to reach larger audiences.
Using a multiplatform strategy that includes mobile, Internet, and social media components,
HHS is harnessing technology to deliver smoking cessation interventions broadly and inex
pensively to both teens and adults. Participating in conversations and building a community
is a way that social media tools, like Facebook and Twitter, can help HHS integrate social
support into our interventions and remove barriers associated with traditional smoking
cessation treatments.
15
22. The Odds of Quitting
• 68 8% of smokers say they want to quit
(Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 2011c)
• 52 4% of smokers had made a quit
attempt in the past year (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2011c)
• The average smoker makes multiple
attempts before succeeding
(Fiore et al , 2008)
Building on the success of its
existing cessation Web sites
(www.smokefree.gov and
www.women.smokefree.
gov), NCI recently launched
Smokefree Teen, a suite
of mobile and online re
sources to help teen smok
ers quit. Smokefree Teen
features a youth-oriented
cessation Web site (www.
teen.smokefree.gov) as well
as tools to connect teens
with cessation support via
their mobile phones. Also,
SmokefreeTXT is a free text message cessation service that provides encouragement, advice,
and actionable behavioral strategies to teens trying to quit smoking. Teens can sign up to
receive text messages timed around their quit date and to continue receiving them for up to
6 weeks after they quit. Message content is targeted to the unique needs of teen smokers, and
the bidirectional service allows teens to request real-time support when faced with common
situational triggers, such as when they feel stressed and are tempted to smoke. Teens with
iPhones can also download QuitStart, a mobile application that delivers cessation and mood
management tips, tracks cravings, and monitors quit attempts. Along with the launch of
these mobile tools, Smokefree Teen also unveiled a comprehensive social media strategy that
includes an active presence on several social media pages: Twitter (@SmokefreeTeen), Face-
book (www.facebook.com/SmokefreeTeen), and Tumblr (www.smokefreeteen.tumblr.com).
In addition, to reach adult smokers, NCI has introduced several new mobile and social
media tools as well. SmokefreeTXT includes a second message library that targets young
adult smokers. As part of a broader social media outreach strategy, NCI’s Smokefree Women
program created a Facebook group to connect women trying to quit smoking. More than
2,500 users are participating, some through their mobile phones. In addition to evidence-
based cessation tips, this virtual community provides women with ready access to the social
support vital for quitting.
NCI also launched an open-source library of smoking cessation messages that provides the
foundation for an interactive text-based intervention for adult smokers called QuitNowTXT.
The QuitNowTXT text messages, which offer tips, motivation, encouragement, and facts
based on information tailored to the user’s response, are available at www.smokefree.gov/
hp.aspx. These mobile texting resources will be integrated into HHS’s comprehensive tobacco
control strategy to further address the burden of tobacco use across our nation.
At the United Nations High-level Meeting on the Prevention and Control of Non-commu
nicable Diseases in September 2011, HHS launched a global public-private partnership to
make the QuitNowTXT program available to other countries to reach adult tobacco users.
Organizations committed to collaborating with HHS on this initiative include the mHealth
Alliance (hosted by the United Nations Foundation), World Medical Association, Campaign
for Tobacco-Free Kids, Johnson & Johnson, IBM, and the Center for Global Health at
16
23. George Washington University. This initiative brings interested governments and organizations
together to support mHealth/text-based demonstration projects using this new text messaging
resource. The QuitNowTXT library is also now freely available on the mHealth Alliance’s
HealthUnbound.org Web site.
Pioneers for Smoking Cessation Campaign Addresses High-Risk Groups
Those individuals suffering from mental illness or substance abuse disorders represent one of
the most vulnerable and tobacco-dependent groups of people. Persons with mental illness are
estimated to consume 44% of all cigarettes sold in the United States (Schroeder & Morris, 2010).
The Connection Between Tobacco
and Mental Illness and Substance
Abuse
• People attending substance abuse
treatment show extremely high rates
(77%) of smoking (Kelly et al , 2012)
• 75% of people with a severe or persistent
mental illness are dependent on tobacco
(American Psychiatric Association, 2006)
In 2009, SAMHSA partnered
with the Smoking Cessation
Leadership Center (SCLC) at
the University of California,
San Francisco (with support
from the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation and
the American Legacy Foun
dation) to help facilities
treating mental illness or
addiction provide tobacco
screening and cessation
support to their patients.
A related goal was to estab
lish smoke-free environments in these facilities. The program seeks to close a gap created 20
years ago when smoking was banned in hospitals but allowed to continue in psychiatric and
drug treatment units.
The first phase of the program mobilized consumer
groups, rehabilitation centers, health care providers, and
other stakeholders at the local level to create smoke-free
environments and provide smoking cessation services.
One hundred organizations, named Pioneers for Smoking
Cessation, received small grants and technical assistance
for their proposed activities through Webinars, a toll-
free number, a dedicated e-mail list, and a catalogue
of tools.
Then, in 2010, SAMHSA launched the second phase
of the program, awarding 25 Pioneers with additional
funding to refine and expand their initiatives benefiting
people with, or at elevated risk for, mental health or
substance use disorders.
Results indicate that 20 of the 25 Pioneers reported
a decrease in tobacco use among clients and staff
(Smoking Cessation Leadership Center, 2011).
State Leadership
Academies for
Wellness and
Smoking
Cessation
• Arizona
• Arkansas
• Maryland
• New York
• North Carolina
• Oklahoma
• Texas
The training and education at facilities has resulted in a more than doubling of the number
of patients being counseled to quit—from just over 20% to just over 50% in the first
18 months of the program (Reyes, 2011). 17
24. In the fall of 2010, the collaboration of SAMHSA and SCLC continued with a new initiative,
State Leadership Academies for Wellness and Smoking Cessation. The purpose of the Academies
is to launch statewide partnerships among behavioral health providers, consumers, and other
stakeholders to create and implement an action plan to reduce smoking prevalence among
people with behavioral health conditions.
Engaging the Public: Changing Social Norms Around Tobacco Use
For the first time, the federal government is making substantial investments in national
tobacco education campaigns. Both traditional media and new electronic media are increasing
awareness of the dangers of tobacco use and promoting the resources available to help people
quit.
CDC Spearheads a National Tobacco Education Campaign
In 2011, CDC launched a 12-week integrated advertising campaign pilot in several markets
in the South and Southeast, where adult and youth smoking rates are among the highest in
the country. Along with traditional media placement, the CDC campaign also included a
substantial social media effort involving a Facebook fan page (www.facebook.com/cdctobac
cofree), YouTube videos, sharable multimedia messages, and Twitter postings. The campaign
achieved increases in smokers’ and nonsmokers’ awareness levels of the three television ads
that ran during that period. It also yielded $2.54 in earned media for every $1.00 spent.
On March 15, 2012, CDC launched a hard-hitting national ad campaign that depicted the
harsh reality of illness and damage suffered as a result of smoking and exposure to second
hand smoke. The Tips From Former Smokers campaign profiled people who are living with
the significant adverse health effects due to smoking, such as paralysis from stroke, lung re
moval, heart attack, asthma, stomas, and limb amputations. The advertisements underscored
the immediate damage that smoking can cause to the body and featured people who experi
enced smoking-related diseases at a relatively young age. These hard-hitting ads helped people
quit, saving lives and decreasing the huge economic burden caused by tobacco use. The ads
were tagged with 1-800-QUIT-NOW, a toll-free number to access quit support across the
country, or the www.smokefree.gov Web site, which provides free quitting information.
The campaign’s paid advertisements and public service announcements delivered a mix of
high-impact advertising via television, radio, newspapers, magazines, movie theaters, bill
boards, and Web and social media such as Facebook and Twitter. The campaign has generated
almost 200,000 additional calls to 1-800-QUIT-NOW and more than 400,000 additional
unique visitors to www.smokefree.gov. These numbers provide a powerful early indication
that the 12-week campaign, which ended on June 10, is on track to surpass the goal of gen
erating at least 500,000 quit attempts and 50,000 successful long-term quits. Further data
detailing the number of quit attempts will be available later this year. Throughout the
12-week campaign, more than 4,000 news stories with a total reach of 3.6 billion impressions
and a publicity value exceeding $10.5 million have been generated.
18
25. FDA Initiates the First of Multiple Public Education Campaigns
FDA plans to launch multiple campaigns to educate the public about the constituents in
tobacco products and the harms of tobacco use, to reduce initiation, and to encourage cessa
tion. Integrated campaigns, including advertising, digital marketing, social media, and event
marketing, will reach and engage teen and young adult audiences. Special emphasis will be
directed toward at-risk and underserved populations with high prevalence levels of tobacco
use. Each distinct campaign will utilize formative research to ensure that the messages edu
cate in ways that are relevant and motivating to unique audiences, with a goal of providing
accurate information so youth can effectively resist pressure to initiate tobacco use and adults
are encouraged to try to quit. Also, each campaign will undergo rigorous evaluation to dem
onstrate its effectiveness.
New Health Warning Labels Will Convey
the Harms of Tobacco
In 2009, four new health warnings were required for smoke
less tobacco products. These health warnings now cover 30%
of the two main surfaces of smokeless tobacco packages, and
these warnings must comprise at least 20% of smokeless
tobacco advertisements. In June 2011, FDA promulgated
the historic final rule requiring cigarette packaging and ad
vertisements nationwide to feature new warning statements
accompanied by graphic images depicting the negative
health consequences of smoking. This rule marked the first
change to cigarette warnings in 25 years. FDA has developed
nine warning label designs that educate consumers about
the health risks of smoking. These warnings are designed to
cover the top 50% of the front and back of cigarette pack
ages and will occupy 20% of each cigarette advertisement.
As noted earlier, a lawsuit by the tobacco industry has halted
implementation of the cigarette labels.
Studies in other countries have shown that exposure to larger health warnings and exposure
to graphic health warnings increase awareness of the health risks of tobacco use. This
increased awareness can also lead to an increased interest in quitting, prompting calls
to quitlines and conversations with a doctor, and therefore increase the number of successful
quit attempts. Such education also discourages nonsmokers from starting. Based on an
extensive evidence base, FDA expects that the new cigarette warnings will decrease the
number of smokers and result in lives saved, increased life expectancy, improved health, and
reduced medical costs. Specifically, it is estimated that these warnings will result in 16,500
fewer smokers each year, both by encouraging smokers to quit and by deterring nonsmokers
from starting to smoke. Importantly, the monetized benefit of the health warnings is esti
mated to be more than $630 million per year over 20 years. Additional benefits of the rule,
such as reduction in secondhand smoke exposure, will also occur but were not included in
the monetized estimate.
19
26. Advancing Knowledge: Accelerating Research to Expand the Science Base
and Monitor Progress
Scientists have known about the dangers of tobacco for decades, but the market for tobacco
and nicotine-delivery products continues to evolve and diversify in unprecedented ways.
To identify more effective methods to prevent youth and young adults from starting and to
help addicted smokers quit, researchers continue to study the effects of tobacco use and the
pathways to addiction. HHS also administers national surveys to monitor tobacco use and
attitudes, understand emerging trends, and guide future efforts. In addition to this ongoing
research, HHS has recently embarked on new efforts to advance knowledge, including up
dated reports from the Surgeon General, a new cohort study of tobacco users, and increased
tobacco regulatory research.
Surgeon General Reports on Tobacco
The Surgeon General provides the public with information to help them lead healthier lives.
For the last 50 years, a series of Surgeon General Reports on tobacco and health has raised
national awareness about the harms of tobacco use and the measures necessary to address
these harms.
The 30th Surgeon General’s Report on tobacco and health, released in 2010, is entitled
How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable
Disease (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010c). It details the ways
in which tobacco smoke damages the human body, with major findings including:
• There is no safe level of exposure to tobacco smoke. Any exposure to tobacco
smoke—even an occasional cigarette or exposure to secondhand smoke—is harmful.
• Damage from tobacco smoke is immediate.
• Smoking longer means more damage.
• Cigarettes are designed for addiction.
• There is no safe cigarette.
• The only proven strategy for reducing the risk for tobacco-related disease and death
is to never smoke, and if you do smoke, to quit.
The report has achieved significant coverage since it was released:
• Within 24 hours of its release, the report received media coverage in all parts of the
country—in more than 2,000 television, radio, print, and online media outlets and
amassing a publicity value of $3 million.
• By year’s end, the report had generated more than $4.6 million in earned media and
42 million media impressions.
On March 8, 2012, Surgeon General Dr. Regina Benjamin released Preventing Tobacco Use
Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General—the 31st tobacco-related
Surgeon General’s Report issued since 1964. This report describes the epidemic of tobacco
use among youth ages 12 through 17 and young adults ages 18 through 25, including the
epidemiology, causes, and health effects of tobacco use and interventions proven to prevent it
(U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2012a). Major findings include:
20
27. • Far too many young people are still using tobacco. More than 600,000 middle
school students and 3 million high school students smoke cigarettes. Rates of decline
for youth cigarette smoking have slowed in the last decade, and rates of decline for
smokeless tobacco use have stalled completely.
• Prevention efforts must include focus on young adults ages 18 through 25, too.
Nearly 9 out of 10 smokers started smoking by age 18, and 99% started by age 26.
Progression from occasional to daily smoking almost always occurs by age 26.
• Tobacco use by youth and young adults causes both immediate and long-term
damage. One of the most serious health effects is nicotine addiction, which prolongs
tobacco use and can lead to severe health consequences. The younger youth are when
they start using tobacco, the more likely they’ll become addicted.
• Youth are vulnerable to social and environmental influences to use tobacco; messages
and images that make tobacco use appealing to them are everywhere.
• Tobacco companies spend more than a million dollars an hour in this country alone
to market their products. This report concludes that tobacco product advertising and
promotions still entice far too many young people to start using tobacco.
• Comprehensive, sustained, multicomponent programs can cut youth tobacco use
in half in 6 years.
The report has achieved significant coverage since it was released:
• In the first 2 weeks, more than 2,000 media outlets and 2,300 social media and
Web sites covered the report.
• Three months later, the report had generated approximately $6.69 million in earned
media and 2.9 billion media impressions.
On May 30th, Dr. Regina Benjamin, U.S. Surgeon General, announced the winners of a
video contest she launched on March 15, 2012, in conjunction with the release of Preventing
Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. At that time, she
invited young Americans to develop original videos that featured one or more of the findings
from the report.
The contest—Tobacco: I’m Not Buying It—was hosted by CDC’s Office on Smoking and
Health (OSH) and supported through Challenge.gov. Applicants were invited to submit
videos in either English or Spanish in two age categories: youth (13–17 years) or young
adult (18–25 years). This creative outlet encouraged applicants to express their views about
this problem and share why they choose to be tobacco-free. To encourage participation in
the contest, CDC/OSH announced the availability of up to four grand prizes (one for each
category, both in English and in Spanish). Three runner-up prizes were also available for each
category and language. Contestants were instructed to submit their content via the Challenge
.gov Web site.
21
28. CDC also publicly announced the winners and runners-up and promoted their videos
through a variety of digital media (Web sites, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter), providing them
with broader recognition and further publicizing the Surgeon General’s Report findings.
On June 14, 2012, Dr. Benjamin and other public health officials joined youth in Seattle,
Washington, to participate in a youth and tobacco town hall sponsored by HHS and FDA,
in partnership with CDC, state and local public health authorities, and tobacco preven
tion professionals throughout the Pacific Northwest. This town hall brought together public
health professionals; tobacco use prevention specialists; educators; advocates; policy makers;
and most importantly, young people from around the Pacific Northwest to share informa
tion, tools, and best practices in tobacco use prevention.
FDA and NIH Collaboration
In October 2011, FDA and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a joint
national, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of tobacco users (and those at risk for
tobacco product use) to monitor and assess their tobacco use and the health impacts of such
use. The initiative, called the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study,
represents the first large-scale FDA-NIH collaboration on tobacco regulatory research since
Congress granted FDA the authority to regulate tobacco products under the Tobacco
Control Act. Scientific experts at NIDA and FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) will
coordinate this effort, which will prospectively follow at least 60,000 people who are users
of tobacco products and those at risk for tobacco product use ages 12 and older in the United
States. The study will a) examine what makes people susceptible to tobacco product use;
b) evaluate initiation and use patterns; c) study patterns of tobacco product cessation and
relapse; d) evaluate the effects of regulatory changes on risk perceptions and other tobacco-
related attitudes; e) assess differences in attitudes, behaviors, and key health outcomes
in racial/ethnic, gender, and age subgroups; and f) assess biomarkers of exposure and disease
outcomes.
By measuring and accurately
reporting on behavioral and
The PATH Study
health effects associated with
“The launch of this study signals a major mile-
tobacco product use in the
stone in addressing one of the most significant
United States, this study
public health burdens of the 21st century The
will play an important role
results will strengthen FDA’s ability to fulfill
in the development, imple
our mission to make tobacco-related death and
mentation, and evaluation of
disease part of America’s past and will further
tobacco product regulations
guide us in targeting the most effective actions
by FDA.
to decrease the huge toll of tobacco use on our
nation’s health ”NIH and FDA have estab
lished an unprecedented re
- FDA Commissioner Margaret A Hamburg
search partnership to increase
tobacco regulatory science
knowledge and capabilities.
This partnership has begun innovative research of the impact of how altering nicotine levels
in tobacco products could affect the way people use tobacco products and become addicted.
FDA and NIH are working to establish Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science for research
relevant to the Tobacco Control Act as well as funding research project grants and research
training grants.
22
29. In a workshop in February 2012, FDA met with research organizations to communicate
its tobacco regulatory research priorities. FDA’s priorities for research include:
• Expanding understanding of the diversity of tobacco products
• Reducing addiction to tobacco products
• Reducing toxicity and carcinogenicity of tobacco products and smoke
• Continuing research of the adverse health consequences of tobacco use
• Broadening understanding of communications about tobacco products
• Increasing knowledge about tobacco product marketing
• Furthering understanding of how economics and policies affect tobacco product use
NIH Research
A number of key NIH agencies are accelerating tobacco research as part of the HHS Strategic
Action Plan. NIDA has made the development of addiction-related medications, including
new smoking cessation medications, a top priority through its Translational Medications
Avant-Garde Award for Medications Development. One of the 2011 awardees is developing
and testing a novel vaccine that induces a strong immune response against nicotine without
the need for chemical enhancers, which could result in a less expensive vaccine with fewer
side effects. In addition, NIDA is embarking on a novel product development partnership
to leverage the strength and resources of public, nonprofit, and private-sector entities to
accelerate the development and production of effective smoking cessation medications at
reasonable costs.
NCI leads and collaborates on research related to the prevention, treatment, and control of
tobacco use and tobacco-related cancers, employing basic and applied research in the bio
logical, behavioral, social, and population sciences. Two fiscal year (FY) 2009 NCI funding
initiatives include “Measures and Determinants of Smokeless Tobacco Use, Prevention, and
Cessation” and “Improving Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Interventions and Programs
in Low-Income Adult Populations.” The goal of the smokeless tobacco initiative is to develop
an evidence base to inform smokeless tobacco control efforts and develop effective ways to
limit the spread and promote cessation of smokeless tobacco use. The long-term goal of the
initiative is to facilitate a significant reduction in smoking prevalence among low-income
adults, thereby reducing the excess disease burden of tobacco use within these groups and
decreasing the prevalence of smoking the United States as a whole.
Historically, states and communities have played an important role in implementing tobacco
prevention and control policies and programs and in designing and implementing mass
media campaigns. In FY 2012, NCI funded the State and Community Tobacco Control
Research Initiative to support innovative research that will yield actionable findings for state
and community tobacco control programs and practitioners. Research funded by this initia
tive is aimed at addressing understudied aspects of tobacco control policy and media inter
ventions by targeting four high-priority research areas at the state and community levels in
the United States: 1) secondhand smoke policies, 2) tobacco pricing policies, 3) mass media
countermeasures and community social norms, and 4) tobacco industry practices as they
relate to the preceding three items. This research initiative includes seven research project
sites around the country and one coordinating center site.
23
30. CDC Research
CDC has established a partnership with FDA to enhance tobacco-related surveys in the
United States, including the recently conducted 2012 National Youth Tobacco Survey,
which will provide the first round of data to evaluate the impact of CTP’s regulatory efforts
on youth, and the companion National Adult Tobacco Survey, which will be conducted in
the fall of 2012 and aid in evaluating the impact of CTP’s regulatory efforts on tobacco use
among adults.
CDC is currently expanding the Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Morbidity, and Economic
Costs online application, which contains two distinct Internet-based computational pro
grams to estimate the economic and disease impact of smoking on adults and infants, to
include estimates for the international tobacco control community. In addition, CDC is
updating it to include current smoking-attributable factors.
In addition, FDA is funding CDC’s Tobacco Laboratory to conduct a number of specific
analyses related to the Tobacco Control Act. CDC will develop and validate new, more
robust methods for analyzing harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) in
tobacco products and tobacco smoke. CDC will use its expertise to train staff in FDA’s Office
of Regulatory Affairs Southeast Regional Laboratory to carry out analytical methods for com
pliance and enforcement testing. CDC’s laboratory is establishing baseline levels of HPHC
in selected tobacco products and smoke in order to assess the overall risk and overall trends
in delivery of HPHC. The laboratory is building off of its decades-long experience in devel
oping new biomarkers of exposure to HPHC in order to more fully assess the exposure of
users of tobacco products. In order to better understand the relationship of tobacco product
design, additives, ingredients, HPHC, and exposure, the laboratory is measuring biomark
ers of exposure in smoking participants of the National Health Examination and Nutrition
Examination Survey. The laboratory will serve as the primary biomarker analysis laboratory
for the PATH study in order to help develop the most effective regulatory actions and to
evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions on exposure of users and nonusers of tobacco
products. CDC also conducts quick-turnaround projects to address specific questions related
to FDA regulations.
SAMHSA Surveillance
SAMHSA’S National Survey on Drug Use and Health collects data on tobacco use and its
association with both the use of other substances and mental health disorders. Additionally,
beginning in 2011, SAMHSA’s National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services,
which collects data from all private and public substance abuse treatment facilities in the
United States, began collecting data on the extent of a facility’s smoking policy and whether
the facility provides nicotine replacement and/or non-nicotine smoking cessation medications
to its clients.
24
31. Toward a Society Free From
Tobacco-Related Death and Disease
For more than a century, tobacco use has been a burden on American public health, causing
decreased quality of life for tens of millions of Americans, almost half a million lost lives
annually, and billions of dollars each year in medical expenses and lost productivity.
Despite these challenges, the resolve among HHS and other public health authorities to end
the tobacco epidemic is strong, and the potential to do so unprecedented. More than ever
before, public attitudes, political will, and scientific evidence are converging to support this
goal.
A growing body of successful evidence-based tobacco control measures has added powerful
new tools to stem tobacco use. HHS’s Strategic Action Plan to end the tobacco epidemic
provides a critical framework to guide and coordinate this work. Already, as described in this
publication, federal and state agencies, together with local communities, are hard at work on
many fronts applying proven methods for reducing the burden of tobacco dependence in the
United States.
HHS has led the way by implementing the proven tobacco prevention and treatment
interventions recommended in the Strategic Action Plan. The Plan demonstrates that HHS
is making good on this historic opportunity to rekindle the momentum of previous decades
and achieve the vision of a society free from tobacco-related death and disease.
To sustain the recent progress, robust action by HHS and other stakeholders must continue.
With a committed and concerted effort, HHS and other public and private-sector partners
across the country can achieve the Healthy People objectives of preventing youth initiation
and reducing the adult smoking rate, resulting in millions of fewer smokers in the United
States. The path charted by that achievement will then set a powerful stage for continued
progress and success toward the ultimate goal of eliminating tobacco-related illness and
death.
25
33. Appendix A: Tracking Progress Toward
the Healthy People Objectives
The Strategic Action Plan is framed around Healthy People goals and objectives. Released
by HHS each decade since 1980, Healthy People establishes 10-year targets to guide national
health promotion and disease prevention efforts. In December 2010, HHS launched Healthy
People 2020 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010b), the fourth generation
of this initiative, building on a foundation of three decades of work.
HHS adopted four Healthy People 2020 objectives as the key goals for its Strategic Action
Plan (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010b):
• Reduce tobacco use by adults and adolescents
• Reduce the initiation of tobacco use among children, adolescents, and young adults
• Increase smoking cessation success by adult smokers
• Reduce the proportion of nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke
HHS commits to tracking key outcomes noted below as part of these four objectives.
Adult Smoking Prevalence
Current overall smoking prevalence falls short of the Healthy People 2020 target of 12%.
27
34. • As of 2010, nearly one-fifth of American adults smoke (Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, 2011a).
• The percentage of adults who smoke has been declining for many years, with today’s
smoking rate being less than half of what it was in the 1960s. However, the rate
of decline has slowed in recent years (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
2011a).
Some adults smoke at much higher rates than others. For example, in 2010:
• Non-Hispanic whites (21.0%) and blacks (20.6%) are far more likely to smoke than
Hispanics (12.5%) and Asians (9.2%) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
2011a).
• Among racial/ethnic groups, American Indians/Alaska Natives have the highest
smoking rates (31.4%), but they have shown a large decrease in recent years (Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a).
• People who did not finish high school (25.1%) and those with only a high school
diploma (23.8%) smoked at more than twice the rate of those with an undergraduate
college education (9.9%) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a).
• Persons with chronic mental illness consume 44% of all cigarettes sold, reflecting
both high prevalence and heavy smoking (Schroeder & Morris, 2010).
• Cigarette smoking also varies widely by geographic area. For example, 9.1% of adults
in Utah and 12.1% of adults in California smoked cigarettes, compared with 26.8%
in West Virginia and 24.8% in Kentucky. Overall, smoking rates were highest in the
Midwest (21.8%) and South (21.0%) and lowest in the West (15.9%) and Northeast
(17.4%) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011a).
Adolescent Tobacco Use
In 2011, about 23% of high school students reported current use of some type of tobacco
product, and 18% smoked cigarettes.
28
35. • The United States is not close to achieving the Healthy People 2020 targets for adoles
cent tobacco use (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010b).
• Teen smoking rates increased dramatically through the mid-1990s, then dropped
sharply. However, in recent years, the decline in prevalence has slowed (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2010b).
• Since gradually falling in the preceding decade, smokeless tobacco use has risen
slightly since 2003 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010b).
As with adults, patterns of tobacco use by high school students vary by demographic group.
For example, in 2009:
• White high school students were more than twice as likely to smoke as black high
school students. Hispanic high school students smoke more than black high school
students (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010b).
• Smokeless tobacco remains a predominantly male problem; usage rates for high
school students were 13.4% for males compared to 2.3% for females (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2010b).
Smoking Initiation
The vast majority of smokers start when they are adolescents or young adults.
29
36. • The 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health estimated that 2.4 million
people smoked a cigarette for the first time within the past 12 months (Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011).
• The rate of adolescent initiation has held fairly steady for the last decade. In 2010,
5.8% of adolescents who had never smoked before smoked a cigarette for the first
time (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011).
• Among 18- to 25-year-olds, the rate of initiation has increased since 2002. In 2010,
7.9% of the nonsmokers in this age group tried a cigarette for the first time
(Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2011).
30
37. Attempts to Quit
Every year, almost half of the adult smokers in the United States try to quit.
• The proportion of adult smokers who try to quit each year has increased slowly, at
best, and the nation is far from the Healthy People 2020 objectives of 80% of adult
smokers trying to quit each year (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
2010b).
31
38. Exposure to Secondhand Smoke
The percentage of nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke has decreased dramatically
since the early 1990s, owing to a combination of local, state, and federal smoke-free laws;
workplace policies; and people deciding to make their homes smoke-free. The Healthy People
2010 goal has been exceeded (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2006).
Despite the overall progress at reducing nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke, some
groups remain disproportionally at risk. For example, in 2007–2008:
• Children aged 3-11 years (53.6%) were more likely to be exposed to secondhand
smoke than adults aged 20 years and older (36.7%) (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 2010a).
• Black nonsmokers (55.9%) were exposed to secondhand smoke at much higher
rates than whites (40.1%) or Hispanics (28.5%) (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 2010a).
32
39. Appendix B: List of Acronyms
ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CPPW Communities Putting Prevention to Work
CTG Community Transformation Grant
CTP Center for Tobacco Products
CUNY City University of New York
FDA Food and Drug Administration
FEHB Federal Employee Health Benefits
FY Fiscal year
HHS Department of Health and Human Services
HPHC Harmful and potentially harmful constituents
HRSA Health Resources and Services Administration
MOU Memorandum of understanding
NCI National Cancer Institute
NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
NHIS National Health Interview Survey
NIDA National Institute on Drug Abuse
NIH National Institutes of Health
NSDUH National Survey on Drug Use and Health
NTCP National Tobacco Control Program
OPM Office of Personnel Management
OSH Office on Smoking and Health
PACT Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking
PATH Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health
SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
SCLC Smoking Cessation Leadership Center
YRBSS Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System
33
40. References
American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. (2012). U.S. colleges and universities with smokefree and tobacco-
free policies. Retrieved from http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/smokefreecollegesuniversities.pdf
American Psychiatric Association. (2006). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with substance use
disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press Inc.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. (2009). Public health benefits and healthcare cost savings from the federal
cigarette tax increase [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from http://staging.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/
pdf/0314.pdf
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. (2010). The PACT Act and Indian tribes [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from http://
www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0362.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control
programs—2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost,
and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(45),
1226-1228.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010a). Vital signs: Nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand
smoke—United States, 1999–2008. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59(35), 1141-1146.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010b). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2009.
MMWR: Surveillance Summaries, 59(SS-5).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011a). Vital signs: Current cigarette smoking among adults aged
>/=18 years—United States, 2005–2010. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60(35), 1207-1212.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011b). Community transformation grants (CTGs). Retrieved
from http://www.cdc.gov/communitytransformation/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011c). Quitting smoking among adults—United States, 2001–
2010. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60(44), 1513-1519.
City University of New York. (2011). University rolls out total smoking ban. CUNY Newswire. Retrieved from
http://www1.cuny.edu/mu/forum/2011/02/14/university-rolls-out-total-smoking-ban/
Fiore, M., Jaen, C., Baker, T., Bailey, W., Benowitz, N., Curry, S., . . . Healton, C. (2008). Treating tobacco
use and dependence; 2008 clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.
Food and Drug Administration. (2012). FDA tobacco retail inspection contracts. Retrieved from http://www.
fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/ResourcesforYou/StateLocalTribalandTerritorialGovernments/ucm248083.htm
Kelly, P.J., Baker, A.L., Deane, F.P., Kay-Lambkin, F.K., Bonevski, B., Tregarthen, J. (2012). Prevalence of
smoking and other health risk factors in people attending residential substance abuse treatment. Drug and
Alcohol Review. 31, 638-644. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00465
Land, T., Rigotti, N. A., Levy, D. E., Paskowsky, M., Warner, D., Kwass, J. A., . . . Keithly, L. (2010). A
longitudinal study of Medicaid coverage for tobacco dependence treatments in Massachusetts and associated
decreases in hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease. PLoS Med, 7(12), e1000375. doi:10.1371/journal.
pmed.1000375
34
41. Lightwood, J. M., Dinno, A., & Glantz, S. A. (2008). Effect of the California tobacco control program on
personal health care expenditures. PLoS Med, 5(8), e178. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050178
McKay, B., & Kesmodel, D. (2011, June 11). Labels give cigarette packs a ghoulish makeover, Wall Street
Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303936704576399320327189158.
html
North American Quitline Consortium. (2010). NAQC 2009 annual survey of quitlines. Annual survey of
quitlines. Retrieved from from http://www.naquitline.org/?page=survey2009
Quick, B. (2011). Bans of the Cigarette Trafficking Act. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/info_8424012_
bans-cigarette-trafficking-act.html
Reyes, R-B. S. (2011). 100 pioneers for smoking cessation virtual leadership academy: Impact on provider
intervention behavior. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of San Francisco, San Francisco.
Richard, P., West, K., & Ku, L. (2012). The return on investment of a Medicaid tobacco cessation program in
Massachusetts. PLoS One, 7(1), e29665. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029665
Schroeder, S. A., & Morris, C. D. (2010). Confronting a neglected epidemic: Tobacco cessation for persons
with mental illnesses and substance abuse problems. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 297-314. doi:10.1146/
annurev.publhealth.012809.103701
Smoking Cessation Leadership Center. (2011). 100 pioneers for smoking cessation virtual leadership academy,
phase II—Report to SAMHSA. (Unpublished report).
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2011). Results from the 2010 National Survey
on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2012). FFY 2011 annual Synar reports: Tobacco
sales to youth. Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/prevention/2011-Annual-Synar-Report.pdf
Task Force on Community Preventive Health Services. (2012). The guide to community preventive services
(tobacco topic). Retrieved from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/tobacco/index.html
Trust for America’s Health. (2009). Prevention for a healthier America: Investments in disease prevention yield
significant savings, stronger communities. Retrieved from http://healthyamericans.org/reports/prevention08/
Prevention08.pdf
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2006). The health consequences of involuntary exposure to
secondhand smoke: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010a). Ending the tobacco epidemic: A tobacco control
strategic action plan for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010b). Healthy people 2020: Tobacco use. Retrieved from
http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicId=41
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010c). How tobacco smoke causes disease: The biology and
behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
35
42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012a). Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults:
A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012b). The Affordable Care Act’s prevention and public
health fund in your state [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2011/02/
prevention02092011a.html
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2012). Healthcare and insurance. Retrieved from http://www.opm.gov/
insure/health/nosmoking/officers.asp
36