The document discusses modifications made to the "Toolkit Researcher Article Organizer" tool. The author loves to organize but found the original tool too comprehensive. They modified it to use a "pyramid of tables" structure with each paragraph as a separate pyramid. The primary articles outline the summary and each subsequent pyramid builds on the previous with supporting evidence and references. This allows incrementally breaking down the paper construction. The modifications make the tool more useful for establishing a holistic approach and allowing deeper analysis of information. The discussion of these changes also illustrates how adapting tools can create new models for meeting demands of research and writing.

1. The Tool Modification: Toolkit Researcher Article Organizer
Reflective Evaluation of Experience with Tool
Toolkit Researcher Article Organizer is the chosen tool in the toolkit. I have always been the one that
loved to organize, and love organizers. Writing a research paper, literature review and different documentations, I
use a similar method. I do love this method presented in the toolkit. I have modified this organizer based on the
density of the tool. Previously, this tool was so comprehensive that I would get lost in the table of information that it
took me hours just to build the tool, and then hours to organize it in the paper. I use to wonder is this effective and
efficient? I have modified this tool. Instead of making an article organizer on one table. I would make a pyramid of
tables. Each pyramid is a paragraph. The paragraphs are considera step through the report. The first pyramid I
would include the articles that will outline the summary or overview of the report. The articles and information on
the article organizer becomes part of the paragraphs in the report. This is a correlation to
the Maslow's Hierarchy. The pyramid on the hierarchy allows each person to understand the priority on the
hierarchy and the foundation. The tables consist of priorities in the sentences,word usages and the tone. The social
responsibility of what will be discussed.The second pyramid is the paragraph that may use the same articles and
different information to paraphrase as such,but in the paragraphs,each reference is used with the connections of the
supporting evidence,argument and informative tone that keeps the reader engage of the scholarly practitioner
narration.
Include Modifications you made to the Tool: More Useful
Let me step back for a moment to go into detail of the reason to break down each pyramid with a table for
each paragraph, The hierarchy of articles as to primary and secondary resources,the contact information for
organizations, case studies,experimentations, models, principles, philosophy and the many theoretical frameworks
that conclude and build a brief of a text and documentation of those points made to initiate social change through
scientific process as to social science research in education for the learner and their stakeholders. The concerns of
the tool are the problems of collecting the articles, impertinent information that need order, step by step process and
progress as the methodology and the pedagogy ofthe entail details of building the variables and the factors of all the
components to writing a written technical documentation as to the style of APA and scientific methodology. The
articles as to the case study two would be organized with two modifications on the tool as to two tables, one for
primary resources and the other for secondary resources. I have also built the modification of other tables as to
articles for principles, theoretical frameworks as theories, lab experimentation and other elements of the scientific
process that collectively present all strategies in the brief, documentation and technical report for the scholarly
practitioner. It is with this organizing process,the student can see each paragraph construction per page for each
strategy throughout the journey of the paper. The tone and style can be collective through the breaking down of
sections on the dimensions of the conversation, research, investigation and consciousness ofthe conclusive matters
whether defining the problem, sharing some ideologies of solutions,or arguing and debating the topic for an
informative well established forum in the report.
Modifications Beneficial
These modifications are beneficial based on the need to establish a holistic approach to a concern, problem
and defining the scientific research that supports the argument, database and to give a comprehensive and effective
approach to build new discoveries and explorations on the issues ofchange, innovation and inventive elevations for
the transformative leader and to build the scholarly practitioner. It is with the ability to break down incrementally
and micro-manage the techniques ofword usage,collecting information, construction of hierarchy of priorities of
scholars'research and the ability to implement the new thinker the ability to synthesize and analysis the information
in a holistic compilation of the massive databases ofinterdisciplinary that creates a collective consciousness or
collectives in consciousness which is social change.This allows the thinker, writer and reader to digest the
information in deeper meditations to continue the journey of reformation, restoration and rebuilding systems that

2. may have inaccurate components,defective techniques and dysfunctionalmethodologies to oversight and blind
sights,deadlines or other means to an end.
Meta-Analysis
The discussion with scholars in the education science research community as
to Bazerman and Moore, (2009), to understand the business aspect of education and science
which is organization, leadership and management as decision makers in all that we do in
society, civility and government. We have this in everything we do as to time management,
deadlines and construction of written documentation and verbal documentation. It is in this
conclusion that the evaluation and analysis of this tool in the toolkit is very useful. This is the
illustration of what my point have brought me to discuss about in the ability to adapt and elevate
creates new models and new frameworks, as to this modification that I have done to make my
life efficient and effective to meet the demands and needs of my own life with the activities that
pressures me to do more and to be detail oriented for every aspect of my life. This is one of
many modifications that I have had to make to build a stronger toolkit using traditional toolkits
for my 21st century decision making in writing, research and discourse.
I have attached my modification tool for this week's discussion. Please feel free to use
this tool.
References
Bazerman, M. & Moore, D. (2009). Judgment in managerial decision making. John Wiley &
Sons, Inc. Danvers, MA.

3. Author/Articles Tool
Author(Primary) Year Title Theoretical
Framework:Conceptor
Definition
Paragraph 1
Author(Secondary) Year Title Theoretical
Framework:Conceptor
Definition
Paragraph 2
Author(Case Study) Year Title Theoretical
Framework:Conceptor
Definition

4. Paragraph 3
Author(Theories) Year Title Theoretical Framework
Conceptor Definition
Conclusion
Author(Argument) Year Title Theoretical Framework
Conceptor Definition
Solution,Resolution
Misc.
Author(Informative) Year Title Theoretical Framework
Conceptor Definitions,
Solutions,Resolutions