Bekvämare slipning med bättre komfort efterfrågas ofta av operatörerna inom industrin. Flexovit lanserar nu en ny navrondell som ger högre komfort för operatören samtidigt som man får snabbare avverkning. Den nya navrondellen ger även mindre vibrationer.
Bekvämare slipning med bättre komfort efterfrågas ofta av operatörerna inom industrin. Flexovit lanserar nu en ny navrondell som ger högre komfort för operatören samtidigt som man får snabbare avverkning. Den nya navrondellen ger även mindre vibrationer.
Bekvämare slipning med bättre komfort efterfrågas ofta av operatörerna inom industrin. Flexovit lanserar nu en ny navrondell som ger högre komfort för operatören samtidigt som man får snabbare avverkning. Den nya navrondellen ger även mindre vibrationer.
Bekvämare slipning med bättre komfort efterfrågas ofta av operatörerna inom industrin. Flexovit lanserar nu en ny navrondell som ger högre komfort för operatören samtidigt som man får snabbare avverkning. Den nya navrondellen ger även mindre vibrationer.
El análisis de la resistencia al esfuerzo del suelo, permite cuantificar parámetros necesarios para solucionar problemas relacionados con la resistencia del terreno, que nos permite analizar problemas de la estabilidad de suelos tales como: el estudio de estabilidad de taludes para carreteras, la determinación de la capacidad de soporte en cimentaciones, la presión lateral sobre estructuras de retención de tierras. En presente informe de laboratorio realizado por mi persona, alumna de la Universidad Cesar Vallejo, de la Escuela Académico Profesional de Ingeniería Civil, en donde, se hicieron tres ensayos para determinar la resistencia al esfuerzo cortante de suelo, como es el ensayo de corte directo que es un ensayo muy preciso, su estudio es indispensable ya que los resultados son aproximados y nos pueden dar una idea del comportamiento de suelo al ser sometido a esfuerzos(cortante y normal), a continuación se muestra el ensayo de laboratorio con un tipo de suelo utilizando este tipo de ensayo y observaremos los resultados.
Presentatie over de toekomst van zorg voor Elevation netwerk partners. Gebaseerd op het boek van trendwatcher Adjiedj Bakas (met dank), De Toekomst van Gezondheid.
' FOOD FOR ALL' - THE ONLY STRATEGY FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY IN THE CONTEXT...Dr. Raju M. Mathew
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UN and the various National Governments have miserably failed to address over 85% of the Humanity living in the Rural and Agriculture Sectors besides millions of poor Urban Population. A Five Fold Investment and Growth of the Rural and Agriculture Sector Globally is the only way for sustainable Peace and Development and a Solution for the Global Economic Crisis. It is true when over 80% of the Humanity lives in Hunger and Poverty.
We have reached a Stage of Fall or Decline or Stagnation the Industrial and Service Sectors of the Global Economy.
Unless these issues are addressed on a war footing, Violent Global Revolutions will come out at any moment for the Anger and Resentment of the New generation of Youth and Women..
Islam and Christianity have special responsibility to address the misery and sufferings of the masses.
the like of which we have not seen since the 19th century. Ame.docxoreo10
the like of which we have not seen since the 19th century. America's top tier hasgrown infinitely richer and more removed over the past 25 years. It is not unfairto say that they are literally living in a different country. Few among them sendtheir children to public schools; fewer still send their loved ones to fight our
When you live in one of the riches countries in the world but don't haveaccess to adequate housing, child care etc. the issue becomes survival notwealth attainment. Also, when talking about the poor some don't realize howthis is defined according to the census data that reports these numbers.
The 2009 Poverty Guidelines for the
48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia 61
Persons in family Poverty guideline
1 $10,830
2 14,570
3 18,310
4 22,050
5 25,790
6 29,530
7 33,270
8 37,010
Wealth Pyramid
Paul Kivel in his article, Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Welfare: Confronting
Racism in 1998 which was taken from his speech given at the University of
Kansas he asks us to imagine a pyramid and he explains that this pyramid
represents 100% of the population of the United States. 62 In the pyramid he
discusses wealth or the accumulation of our assets, which can be referred to as
our net worth.
In author Paul Kivel's more recent book, You Call This a Democracy he
discusses his economic pyramid as I have described below:
Economic
Top 1 0/0
Of the
Pyramid
(the
ruling
class):
their net worth is over
Next
190/0 of the
pyramid
(the
managerial
class):
controls
another
44% of the
country's
wealth
the net worth of each
household is over $500,000THESE Two
GROUPS
EQUAL 200/0 OF THE
POPU'LATION BUT THEY CONTROL
910/0 OF THE
WEALTH OF THE RICHEST
COUNTRY IN THE WORLDLast 80% of the pyramid(made up of the middle class, working class & dependent working
controls only 9% of the wealth, which must be divided among them,
an]
their "average" net worth is $38,000 (where many of the dependent
working poor are in the negative)
To make sure you completely understand what this represents, we must define
Net Worth = Assets — Liabilities
Where, assets are items you own of value like an automobile or home and liabilitiesare items that you owe like the car note or mortgage.
For instance, let's assume that you are like many Americans and have thefollowing living circumstances: Your annual income is $25,000, you rent ratherthan own your home, have credit card debt, have a car but you owe on it. You
don't participate in an IRA (Individual Retirement Account), you have no stocks or
mutual funds (wealth building assets), no other investments and only a small
savings in the bank.
Your assets & liabilities may look like this:
Car worth $10,000
Savings $1000
Total Assets $11,000
Car loan $13,000
Credit Card Debt $15,000
Total Liabilities $28,000
Your net worth would be calculated as 11,000 - 28,000 = (17,000) which
mean that you are in the red, because you have a negative net worth. Now where
d ...
Byline BY JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ ILLUSTRATION BY STEPHEN DOYLEOF TH.docxRAHUL126667
Byline: BY JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ ILLUSTRATION BY STEPHEN DOYLE
OF THE 1%, BY THE 1%, FOR THE 1%
Americans have been watching protests against oppressive regimes that concentrate massive wealth in the hands of an elite few. Yet in our own democracy, 1 percent of the people take nearly a quarter of the nation's income-an inequality even the wealthy will come to regret
It's no use pretending that what has obviously happened has not in fact happened. The upper 1 percent of Americans are now taking in nearly a quarter of the nation's income every year. In terms of wealth rather than income, the top 1 percent control 40 percent. Their lot in life has improved considerably. Twenty-five years ago, the corresponding figures were 12 percent and 33 percent. One response might be to celebrate the ingenuity and drive that brought good fortune to these people, and to contend that a rising tide lifts all boats. That response would be misguided. While the top 1 percent have seen their incomes rise 18 percent over the past decade, those in the middle have actually seen their incomes fall. For men with only high-school degrees, the decline has been precipitous12 percent in the last quarter-century alone. All the growth in recent decadesand morehas gone to those at the top. In terms of income equality, America lags behind any country in the old, ossified Europe that President George W. Bush used to deride. Among our closest counterparts are Russia with its oligarchs and Iran. While many of the old centers of inequality in Latin America, such as Brazil, have been striving in recent years, rather successfully, to improve the plight of the poor and reduce gaps in income, America has allowed inequality to grow.
Economists long ago tried to justify the vast inequalities that seemed so troubling in the mid-19th centuryinequalities that are but a pale shadow of what we are seeing in America today. The justification they came up with was called "marginal-productivity theory." In a nutshell, this theory associated higher incomes with higher productivity and a greater contribution to society. It is a theory that has always been cherished by the rich. Evidence for its validity, however, remains thin. The corporate executives who helped bring on the recession of the past three yearswhose contribution to our society, and to their own companies, has been massively negativewent on to receive large bonuses. In some cases, companies were so embarrassed about calling such rewards "performance bonuses" that they felt compelled to change the name to "retention bonuses" (even if the only thing being retained was bad performance). Those who have contributed great positive innovations to our society, from the pioneers of genetic understanding to the pioneers of the Information Age, have received a pittance compared with those responsible for the financial innovations that brought our global economy to the brink of ruin.
Some people look at income inequality and shrug their shoulders. So ...
El análisis de la resistencia al esfuerzo del suelo, permite cuantificar parámetros necesarios para solucionar problemas relacionados con la resistencia del terreno, que nos permite analizar problemas de la estabilidad de suelos tales como: el estudio de estabilidad de taludes para carreteras, la determinación de la capacidad de soporte en cimentaciones, la presión lateral sobre estructuras de retención de tierras. En presente informe de laboratorio realizado por mi persona, alumna de la Universidad Cesar Vallejo, de la Escuela Académico Profesional de Ingeniería Civil, en donde, se hicieron tres ensayos para determinar la resistencia al esfuerzo cortante de suelo, como es el ensayo de corte directo que es un ensayo muy preciso, su estudio es indispensable ya que los resultados son aproximados y nos pueden dar una idea del comportamiento de suelo al ser sometido a esfuerzos(cortante y normal), a continuación se muestra el ensayo de laboratorio con un tipo de suelo utilizando este tipo de ensayo y observaremos los resultados.
Presentatie over de toekomst van zorg voor Elevation netwerk partners. Gebaseerd op het boek van trendwatcher Adjiedj Bakas (met dank), De Toekomst van Gezondheid.
' FOOD FOR ALL' - THE ONLY STRATEGY FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY IN THE CONTEXT...Dr. Raju M. Mathew
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UN and the various National Governments have miserably failed to address over 85% of the Humanity living in the Rural and Agriculture Sectors besides millions of poor Urban Population. A Five Fold Investment and Growth of the Rural and Agriculture Sector Globally is the only way for sustainable Peace and Development and a Solution for the Global Economic Crisis. It is true when over 80% of the Humanity lives in Hunger and Poverty.
We have reached a Stage of Fall or Decline or Stagnation the Industrial and Service Sectors of the Global Economy.
Unless these issues are addressed on a war footing, Violent Global Revolutions will come out at any moment for the Anger and Resentment of the New generation of Youth and Women..
Islam and Christianity have special responsibility to address the misery and sufferings of the masses.
the like of which we have not seen since the 19th century. Ame.docxoreo10
the like of which we have not seen since the 19th century. America's top tier hasgrown infinitely richer and more removed over the past 25 years. It is not unfairto say that they are literally living in a different country. Few among them sendtheir children to public schools; fewer still send their loved ones to fight our
When you live in one of the riches countries in the world but don't haveaccess to adequate housing, child care etc. the issue becomes survival notwealth attainment. Also, when talking about the poor some don't realize howthis is defined according to the census data that reports these numbers.
The 2009 Poverty Guidelines for the
48 Contiguous States and the District of Columbia 61
Persons in family Poverty guideline
1 $10,830
2 14,570
3 18,310
4 22,050
5 25,790
6 29,530
7 33,270
8 37,010
Wealth Pyramid
Paul Kivel in his article, Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Welfare: Confronting
Racism in 1998 which was taken from his speech given at the University of
Kansas he asks us to imagine a pyramid and he explains that this pyramid
represents 100% of the population of the United States. 62 In the pyramid he
discusses wealth or the accumulation of our assets, which can be referred to as
our net worth.
In author Paul Kivel's more recent book, You Call This a Democracy he
discusses his economic pyramid as I have described below:
Economic
Top 1 0/0
Of the
Pyramid
(the
ruling
class):
their net worth is over
Next
190/0 of the
pyramid
(the
managerial
class):
controls
another
44% of the
country's
wealth
the net worth of each
household is over $500,000THESE Two
GROUPS
EQUAL 200/0 OF THE
POPU'LATION BUT THEY CONTROL
910/0 OF THE
WEALTH OF THE RICHEST
COUNTRY IN THE WORLDLast 80% of the pyramid(made up of the middle class, working class & dependent working
controls only 9% of the wealth, which must be divided among them,
an]
their "average" net worth is $38,000 (where many of the dependent
working poor are in the negative)
To make sure you completely understand what this represents, we must define
Net Worth = Assets — Liabilities
Where, assets are items you own of value like an automobile or home and liabilitiesare items that you owe like the car note or mortgage.
For instance, let's assume that you are like many Americans and have thefollowing living circumstances: Your annual income is $25,000, you rent ratherthan own your home, have credit card debt, have a car but you owe on it. You
don't participate in an IRA (Individual Retirement Account), you have no stocks or
mutual funds (wealth building assets), no other investments and only a small
savings in the bank.
Your assets & liabilities may look like this:
Car worth $10,000
Savings $1000
Total Assets $11,000
Car loan $13,000
Credit Card Debt $15,000
Total Liabilities $28,000
Your net worth would be calculated as 11,000 - 28,000 = (17,000) which
mean that you are in the red, because you have a negative net worth. Now where
d ...
Byline BY JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ ILLUSTRATION BY STEPHEN DOYLEOF TH.docxRAHUL126667
Byline: BY JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ ILLUSTRATION BY STEPHEN DOYLE
OF THE 1%, BY THE 1%, FOR THE 1%
Americans have been watching protests against oppressive regimes that concentrate massive wealth in the hands of an elite few. Yet in our own democracy, 1 percent of the people take nearly a quarter of the nation's income-an inequality even the wealthy will come to regret
It's no use pretending that what has obviously happened has not in fact happened. The upper 1 percent of Americans are now taking in nearly a quarter of the nation's income every year. In terms of wealth rather than income, the top 1 percent control 40 percent. Their lot in life has improved considerably. Twenty-five years ago, the corresponding figures were 12 percent and 33 percent. One response might be to celebrate the ingenuity and drive that brought good fortune to these people, and to contend that a rising tide lifts all boats. That response would be misguided. While the top 1 percent have seen their incomes rise 18 percent over the past decade, those in the middle have actually seen their incomes fall. For men with only high-school degrees, the decline has been precipitous12 percent in the last quarter-century alone. All the growth in recent decadesand morehas gone to those at the top. In terms of income equality, America lags behind any country in the old, ossified Europe that President George W. Bush used to deride. Among our closest counterparts are Russia with its oligarchs and Iran. While many of the old centers of inequality in Latin America, such as Brazil, have been striving in recent years, rather successfully, to improve the plight of the poor and reduce gaps in income, America has allowed inequality to grow.
Economists long ago tried to justify the vast inequalities that seemed so troubling in the mid-19th centuryinequalities that are but a pale shadow of what we are seeing in America today. The justification they came up with was called "marginal-productivity theory." In a nutshell, this theory associated higher incomes with higher productivity and a greater contribution to society. It is a theory that has always been cherished by the rich. Evidence for its validity, however, remains thin. The corporate executives who helped bring on the recession of the past three yearswhose contribution to our society, and to their own companies, has been massively negativewent on to receive large bonuses. In some cases, companies were so embarrassed about calling such rewards "performance bonuses" that they felt compelled to change the name to "retention bonuses" (even if the only thing being retained was bad performance). Those who have contributed great positive innovations to our society, from the pioneers of genetic understanding to the pioneers of the Information Age, have received a pittance compared with those responsible for the financial innovations that brought our global economy to the brink of ruin.
Some people look at income inequality and shrug their shoulders. So ...
Multitud de desafíos sobre crimen y castigo enfrentan las naciones del mundo al comienzo de este nuevo siglo y, al parecer, hay pocas o ninguna respuesta. En muchos sentidos, los criminólogos de hoy tienen semejanza con los médicos de hace 200 años; como ellos, tenemos algunas ideas, pero muy poco conocimiento. Desde 1800, sin embargo, en el campo de la Medicina se han visto incomunicables niveles de avance. Por supuesto, la muerte y la delincuencia nunca se eliminarán, pero algunas enfermedades han suprimido virtualmente su impacto de manera significativa, la esperanza de vida casi se ha duplicado y ha mejorado la calidad de vida útil. Si el campo de la Criminología desea avanzar, tendrá que adoptar el mismo modelo de procedimiento utilizado por la Medicina, el cual incluye la adopción de la educación transnacional, la utilización del diseño experimental y la evaluación basada en la evidencia, adoptando una perspectiva interdisciplinaria y la integración de la Criminología Científica con la Criminología Política.
From Poverty to Power is essential reading for anyone involved in change processes around the world. A new take on development for the 21st century, Oxfam International’s new book provides critical insights into the massive human and economic costs of inequality and poverty and proposes realistic solutions.
This presentation was given by the author Duncan Green presentation at the CIVICUS World Assembly in Glasgow, June 2008.
The Millennial Generation: Who They Are & Why You Need ThemMorgan Smith
Delivered at Longmont Startup Week 2016 by Morgan Smith. These slides focus on the generational story and profile of the Millennial Generation and outline the economics, consumption habits, politics, and workplace habits around Millennials and then answers why we need them. The slides are only part of the presentation delivered by Morgan and hearing him in person completes your understanding of the information presented.
1. Justprocessing.So in a responsible world and accountable world.like monopoly,if everyone is given per household
5 million dollars,a business,a property, technology, wardrobe,and a skill,a fixed variable on all goods and services,
and fixed rate on all economies,trading and all necessaryconsumption,and managementsystems for recycling and
regeneration systems to restore and maintain,the basic needs oflife,would increase the value of those on upper
levels of the pyramid financially. Poverty and middle class would be resolved,the conflict of war would be resolved
because people would have equallyall possessions.Conflictwould be based on malicious intentand nottrauma and
survival. The new conflictwould be premeditation sickness to overcome greed.The level of wealth in the sense of
capitalism so to speak would be curved by 20 to 30% but function on 70 to 80% even fixed variable rate between
60% to 80% which is so much better than 1000% over the ground level which is 90% poverty, crime and poor quality
health care, education and other services thatare provided from the lack of resources or should i sayscarcity. The
number is curving the wealth from the wealthy which is anyone over $250,000 assets and equitythat generate above
the base pay of $250,000.Therefore, 20% to 40% off of global wealth to rebuild,regenerate and restructure the
world's economywould increase immortalityrates, sustainabilityrates,increase beautification ofall properties,and
increase the value of people and their interaction with each other. It would increase qualityof services and products
because people are healthyand valued. but that is in a dream like world.But who can stop me from believing in
miracles.And this is a basic model ofmy theory.