MAINFRAME
DAY
EDITION 2021
DARE TO UNLOCK
YOUR MAINFRAME!
2
DevOps on mainframe
Modernize and integrate
Jérôme KLIMM Mainframe Consultant Trigone
3
“DevOps is not a Goal, But a
never-ending process of
continuous improvement”
Jez Humble
INTRODUCTION
4
“Devs are from Venus, Ops are
from Mars ”
Steven Haines
A CULTURAL
APPROACH
5
A C u l t u r a l A p p r o a c h
Considering Developers Mindset
• DEVs have the culture of innovation and creating applicative value
• They are under pressure from the “Market”.
• DEVs needs modern tools and interfaces
• Mindset : OPS are a brake to innovation.
6
A C u l t u r a l A p p r o a c h
Considering Operationals Mindset
• OPS have the culture of zero downtimes (most of the times !)
• They need stability, normalization and fixed rules to ensure SLA.
• Mindset : « A change is a managed risk ».
7
A C u l t u r a l A p p r o a c h
The Z(Mainframe) Factor
• Mainframe is the most resilient and secure platform in the market.
• Supports most of trending technologies
• Can be virtualized*
• Z is Hybrid Cloud Ready
8
A C u l t u r a l A p p r o a c h
« Z + DEV + OPS = ZDEVOPS »
• DEV+OPS means merging two culture together, with common values.
• Z + DEV + OPS is about merging two cultures by including a strong platform
with innovative solutions.
• Most important challenge is to Break down silos between Dev and Ops to reach
mutual comprehension and common mindset.
9
“Everything that is done twice must
be automated”
Gatien Dupré
TECHNICAL
APPROACH
10
A t e c h n i c a l a p p r o a c h
Normalize developers experience
• Use one solution that addresses multiple platforms to reduce toolchain complexity.
• Making the Mainframe a technology like any other.
• Support multiple language : Java Cobol Python PL/1 Assembler,...
• NO more 3270 screens.
Measure KPI
• Monitor bottlenecks and focus on improvements axes
11
A t e c h n i c a l a p p r o a c h
Get the best from all matures Technologies
• Integrate opensource software.
• Striking example of a mature technology :
Expose Mainframe legacy applications via RESTful APIs (z/OS Connect,DB2Rest…).
Speed time to Market
• Reduce the learning curve for new developers.
• Automate test and delivery CT/CI/CD for delivering with quality.
12
“Don’t oppose ITIL and AGILE”
ORGANIZATIONAL
APPROACH
13
A O r g a n i z a t i o n a l A p p r o a c h
Co-build the Sofware Factory with Endusers and Ops
• Share ideas and use user feedbacks to enhance the product.
• Setup a cross-functional team (Pizza Team).
Create a community(And manage it)
• Use modern approach (social networks, serious gaming,…) to increase community and user contributions.
Simplify approbation Review Process (ITIL)
• Streamline committal and approval of changes.
14
C o n c l u s i o n
Key Points for Success
• Co-construction is the key for rapid and massive adoption.
• Don’t oppose ITIL and AGILE, find accommodations.
• Build a cross-functional team (Pizza Team) that can setup innovative solution.
• Feel free to Experiment !
• Create an active community (Serious Games, Blogging, Rewards systems,…).
• Listen and apply Endusers feedbacks and suggestions.
• Deliver small but often (Sprint) .
• Get KPI (Key point Indicator) to monitoring and reporting.
15
“Dare to commit…”
“To the z/DevOps path”
16
DevOps on mainframe
Modernize and integrate
Benoit Ebner Mainframe Engineer NRB
17
1. Modernize the user desktop
2. ISPW installation: a real case
3. zAdviser: the metrics you need to know
4. Integrate the mainframe in your enterprise deploy
SUMMARY
18
Modernize the user desktop
19
M o d e r n i z e t h e u s e r d e s k t o p
Why do you need it?
• Modernising the developer workspace is necessary for the DevOps transition.
• Modern tools (Git, ISPW, Java, ...) require more complex interfaces.
• Young developers are more used to Windows tools than to the TSO terminal.
• The use of tools such as Eclipse or Visual Studio Code allows more help in development.
20
M o d e r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r
Th e edit or
Upscale the dev tooling
The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought
new capabilities to the coding process.
• Copybook integration into the code
21
M o d e r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r
Th e edit or
Upscale the dev tooling
The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought
new capabilities to the coding process.
• Copybook integration into the code
• Coding help
22
M o d e r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r
Th e edit or
Upscale the dev tooling
The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought
new capabilities to the coding process.
• Copybook integration into the code
• Coding help
• Overview of the code
23
M o d e r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r
Th e edit or
Upscale the dev tooling
The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought
new capabilities to the coding process.
• Copybook integration into the code
• Coding help
• Overview of the code
• Syntax check
24
M o d e r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r
Th e edit or
Upscale the dev tooling
The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought
new capabilities to the coding process.
• Copybook integration into the code
• Coding help
• Overview of the code
• Syntax check
• Graphical Compare/merge
25
ISPW Installation: a real case
26
I S P W i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e
Type of sou rces t o man age
Our client environment
We had to deal with the following types:
• PL/1 Sources
• MFS
• PSB (Batch and IMS)
• DB/2 copybook
• DL/1 copybook
27
I S P W i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e
Syst em complex it y
Our client environment
• 85 combinations of compilation options
• Up to 12 load generated per source file
• Mostly 1 or 2 load generated
• LLA Refresh needed on some LPAR
• Update of table in memory for some object
• Compilation on every LPAR
• We want to stop that! Compile less, but compile at the right time!
28
I S P W i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e
Wh at w e t ry before ISPW
Why using ISPW?
Other tools installed:
• 2008 - Serena
• 2011 - RTC
Why it failed:
• No implication of the development team in the choice
• Complexity of the client vs. rigidity of the tooling
• Try to do everything in one step (SCM installation, integration in the global release management…)
29
I S P W i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e
Wh at w e do for ISPW
Why using ISPW?
• Involvement of the development team in the choice of the product
• POC carried out jointly by the system team and the development team
• The choices made during the implementation were made in agreement with the development team
• Training and first line support by developers
• Step by step implementation
30
I S P W i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e
What is done?
• ISPW installation as a SCM
• Deploy managed by the tool from dev to prod
• Less compilation!
• Example: NO compilation for the PROD lpar
31
I S P W i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e
What we do now?
• Integration into the enterprise wide release management
• Deploy on the mainframe for:
• Java Jar files
• zOS Connect files
• SonarLint & SonarQube integration
• Implementation of a Test Data Management tool
32
zAdviser: the metrics you need to know
33
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
What is zAdviser
• BMC/Compuware product usage analysis tool
• Build on Elastic
• Used to get a statistical view of the source management
• Free of charge
• Focus on 3 panels:
• Development Productivity
• Refactoring Candidates
• Source Control Management
34
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Development Productivity
• Provides insights into the productivity of development teams within the software development life cycle.
• How many software changes are being produced in a release or sprint?
• How long does it take to complete software changes?
• What is slowing development teams down?
• Three different parts:
• Life Cycle: begins on checkout and ends upon promotion to production.
• Testing Phase: begins upon promotion to the testing phase and ends upon promotion to production.
• Development Phase: begins when a component is checked out and ends upon promotion to the testing phase.
35
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Development Productivity
36
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Development Productivity
37
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Refactoring Candidates
• Identifies programs that are those large monolithic programs which may be candidates for refactoring.
• Looking for programs that have the most checkouts, regressions and fallbacks.
• Programs with most checkouts may be candidates for refactoring by preventing more concurrent development.
• Breaking it down into smaller pieces
• allow faster development
• easier understand code
• Programs with most fallbacks and regressions lay be overly complicated and more difficult to understand and test.
38
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Refactoring Candidates
39
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Refactoring Candidates
40
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Source Control Management
• Provides detailed information about the SCM KPIs.
• Useful to see
• The weekly trend of deployment
• The most changed application or source type
41
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Source Control Management
42
z A d v i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w
Source Control Management
43
Integrate the mainframe in your enterprise
deployment
44
I n t e g r a t e t h e m a i n f r a m e i n y o u r e n t e r p r i s e d e p l o y
Purpose of the task
• Synchronize the automatic deployment through all the technology in the company
• Treat the mainframe in the same way as other systems
• The developer doesn’t need to know the deployment platform
45
What we want to do
I n t e g r a t e t h e m a i n f r a m e i n y o u r e n t e r p r i s e d e p l o y
Source
Code
Management
Deploy
Target
46
MAINFRAME
DAY
EDITION 2021
DARE TO UNLOCK
YOUR MAINFRAME!
www.nrb.be
www.trigone.fr

The NRB Group mainframe day 2021 - DevOps on Z - Jerome Klimm - Benoit Ebner

  • 1.
    MAINFRAME DAY EDITION 2021 DARE TOUNLOCK YOUR MAINFRAME!
  • 2.
    2 DevOps on mainframe Modernizeand integrate Jérôme KLIMM Mainframe Consultant Trigone
  • 3.
    3 “DevOps is nota Goal, But a never-ending process of continuous improvement” Jez Humble INTRODUCTION
  • 4.
    4 “Devs are fromVenus, Ops are from Mars ” Steven Haines A CULTURAL APPROACH
  • 5.
    5 A C ul t u r a l A p p r o a c h Considering Developers Mindset • DEVs have the culture of innovation and creating applicative value • They are under pressure from the “Market”. • DEVs needs modern tools and interfaces • Mindset : OPS are a brake to innovation.
  • 6.
    6 A C ul t u r a l A p p r o a c h Considering Operationals Mindset • OPS have the culture of zero downtimes (most of the times !) • They need stability, normalization and fixed rules to ensure SLA. • Mindset : « A change is a managed risk ».
  • 7.
    7 A C ul t u r a l A p p r o a c h The Z(Mainframe) Factor • Mainframe is the most resilient and secure platform in the market. • Supports most of trending technologies • Can be virtualized* • Z is Hybrid Cloud Ready
  • 8.
    8 A C ul t u r a l A p p r o a c h « Z + DEV + OPS = ZDEVOPS » • DEV+OPS means merging two culture together, with common values. • Z + DEV + OPS is about merging two cultures by including a strong platform with innovative solutions. • Most important challenge is to Break down silos between Dev and Ops to reach mutual comprehension and common mindset.
  • 9.
    9 “Everything that isdone twice must be automated” Gatien Dupré TECHNICAL APPROACH
  • 10.
    10 A t ec h n i c a l a p p r o a c h Normalize developers experience • Use one solution that addresses multiple platforms to reduce toolchain complexity. • Making the Mainframe a technology like any other. • Support multiple language : Java Cobol Python PL/1 Assembler,... • NO more 3270 screens. Measure KPI • Monitor bottlenecks and focus on improvements axes
  • 11.
    11 A t ec h n i c a l a p p r o a c h Get the best from all matures Technologies • Integrate opensource software. • Striking example of a mature technology : Expose Mainframe legacy applications via RESTful APIs (z/OS Connect,DB2Rest…). Speed time to Market • Reduce the learning curve for new developers. • Automate test and delivery CT/CI/CD for delivering with quality.
  • 12.
    12 “Don’t oppose ITILand AGILE” ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH
  • 13.
    13 A O rg a n i z a t i o n a l A p p r o a c h Co-build the Sofware Factory with Endusers and Ops • Share ideas and use user feedbacks to enhance the product. • Setup a cross-functional team (Pizza Team). Create a community(And manage it) • Use modern approach (social networks, serious gaming,…) to increase community and user contributions. Simplify approbation Review Process (ITIL) • Streamline committal and approval of changes.
  • 14.
    14 C o nc l u s i o n Key Points for Success • Co-construction is the key for rapid and massive adoption. • Don’t oppose ITIL and AGILE, find accommodations. • Build a cross-functional team (Pizza Team) that can setup innovative solution. • Feel free to Experiment ! • Create an active community (Serious Games, Blogging, Rewards systems,…). • Listen and apply Endusers feedbacks and suggestions. • Deliver small but often (Sprint) . • Get KPI (Key point Indicator) to monitoring and reporting.
  • 15.
  • 16.
    16 DevOps on mainframe Modernizeand integrate Benoit Ebner Mainframe Engineer NRB
  • 17.
    17 1. Modernize theuser desktop 2. ISPW installation: a real case 3. zAdviser: the metrics you need to know 4. Integrate the mainframe in your enterprise deploy SUMMARY
  • 18.
  • 19.
    19 M o de r n i z e t h e u s e r d e s k t o p Why do you need it? • Modernising the developer workspace is necessary for the DevOps transition. • Modern tools (Git, ISPW, Java, ...) require more complex interfaces. • Young developers are more used to Windows tools than to the TSO terminal. • The use of tools such as Eclipse or Visual Studio Code allows more help in development.
  • 20.
    20 M o de r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r Th e edit or Upscale the dev tooling The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought new capabilities to the coding process. • Copybook integration into the code
  • 21.
    21 M o de r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r Th e edit or Upscale the dev tooling The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought new capabilities to the coding process. • Copybook integration into the code • Coding help
  • 22.
    22 M o de r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r Th e edit or Upscale the dev tooling The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought new capabilities to the coding process. • Copybook integration into the code • Coding help • Overview of the code
  • 23.
    23 M o de r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r Th e edit or Upscale the dev tooling The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought new capabilities to the coding process. • Copybook integration into the code • Coding help • Overview of the code • Syntax check
  • 24.
    24 M o de r n i z e t h e d e s k t o p u s e r Th e edit or Upscale the dev tooling The use of Topaz Workbench as the main development tool has brought new capabilities to the coding process. • Copybook integration into the code • Coding help • Overview of the code • Syntax check • Graphical Compare/merge
  • 25.
  • 26.
    26 I S PW i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e Type of sou rces t o man age Our client environment We had to deal with the following types: • PL/1 Sources • MFS • PSB (Batch and IMS) • DB/2 copybook • DL/1 copybook
  • 27.
    27 I S PW i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e Syst em complex it y Our client environment • 85 combinations of compilation options • Up to 12 load generated per source file • Mostly 1 or 2 load generated • LLA Refresh needed on some LPAR • Update of table in memory for some object • Compilation on every LPAR • We want to stop that! Compile less, but compile at the right time!
  • 28.
    28 I S PW i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e Wh at w e t ry before ISPW Why using ISPW? Other tools installed: • 2008 - Serena • 2011 - RTC Why it failed: • No implication of the development team in the choice • Complexity of the client vs. rigidity of the tooling • Try to do everything in one step (SCM installation, integration in the global release management…)
  • 29.
    29 I S PW i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e Wh at w e do for ISPW Why using ISPW? • Involvement of the development team in the choice of the product • POC carried out jointly by the system team and the development team • The choices made during the implementation were made in agreement with the development team • Training and first line support by developers • Step by step implementation
  • 30.
    30 I S PW i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e What is done? • ISPW installation as a SCM • Deploy managed by the tool from dev to prod • Less compilation! • Example: NO compilation for the PROD lpar
  • 31.
    31 I S PW i n s t a l l a t i o n : a r e a l c a s e What we do now? • Integration into the enterprise wide release management • Deploy on the mainframe for: • Java Jar files • zOS Connect files • SonarLint & SonarQube integration • Implementation of a Test Data Management tool
  • 32.
    32 zAdviser: the metricsyou need to know
  • 33.
    33 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w What is zAdviser • BMC/Compuware product usage analysis tool • Build on Elastic • Used to get a statistical view of the source management • Free of charge • Focus on 3 panels: • Development Productivity • Refactoring Candidates • Source Control Management
  • 34.
    34 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Development Productivity • Provides insights into the productivity of development teams within the software development life cycle. • How many software changes are being produced in a release or sprint? • How long does it take to complete software changes? • What is slowing development teams down? • Three different parts: • Life Cycle: begins on checkout and ends upon promotion to production. • Testing Phase: begins upon promotion to the testing phase and ends upon promotion to production. • Development Phase: begins when a component is checked out and ends upon promotion to the testing phase.
  • 35.
    35 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Development Productivity
  • 36.
    36 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Development Productivity
  • 37.
    37 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Refactoring Candidates • Identifies programs that are those large monolithic programs which may be candidates for refactoring. • Looking for programs that have the most checkouts, regressions and fallbacks. • Programs with most checkouts may be candidates for refactoring by preventing more concurrent development. • Breaking it down into smaller pieces • allow faster development • easier understand code • Programs with most fallbacks and regressions lay be overly complicated and more difficult to understand and test.
  • 38.
    38 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Refactoring Candidates
  • 39.
    39 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Refactoring Candidates
  • 40.
    40 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Source Control Management • Provides detailed information about the SCM KPIs. • Useful to see • The weekly trend of deployment • The most changed application or source type
  • 41.
    41 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Source Control Management
  • 42.
    42 z A dv i s e r : t h e m e t r i c s y o u n e e d t o k n o w Source Control Management
  • 43.
    43 Integrate the mainframein your enterprise deployment
  • 44.
    44 I n te g r a t e t h e m a i n f r a m e i n y o u r e n t e r p r i s e d e p l o y Purpose of the task • Synchronize the automatic deployment through all the technology in the company • Treat the mainframe in the same way as other systems • The developer doesn’t need to know the deployment platform
  • 45.
    45 What we wantto do I n t e g r a t e t h e m a i n f r a m e i n y o u r e n t e r p r i s e d e p l o y Source Code Management Deploy Target
  • 46.
    46 MAINFRAME DAY EDITION 2021 DARE TOUNLOCK YOUR MAINFRAME! www.nrb.be www.trigone.fr