A beta version vision about the next internet

1. THE INTERNET
(n.0)
@andreagianotti | andrea.gianotti@live.it | skype:andrea.gianotti

2. INTERNET
OF THINGS
THE MORE YOU CONNECT, GIVE EVRYTHING A SENSOR, GIVE
THE MORE YOU GAIN VALUE EVERY SENSOR A NETWORK, GIVE
ANY NETWORK AN INTERFACE
(@$*($-1)/2 FACTOR).
BE A SOCIOLOGIST AND AN
DON’T STOP USING
SO: CONNECT EVERYTHING STANDARDS AND BEING
ENGINEER AT THE SAME
TIME
AND OPEN YOUR OPEN, DON’T STOP
UPDATING YOUR
NETWORKS. SENSORS: THEY GIVE CONNECT
YOU DATA (AND MONEY) OPEN

3. SEMANTICS
WHAT’S THE MEANING? GIVE SENSE TO THE DATA MESS.
IS THAT MATTER? USE BOTH LANGUAGE REASONING
FOR MICRO AND TEXT MINING FOR
OF COURSE, IT IS. MACRO
STRUCTURIZE WHAT IS YOU’VE TO TAKE BE A LINGUISTAND AN
DIFFERENT PICTURES ENGINEER AT THE SAME
STRUCTURIZABLE. TO THE SAME SCENE: TIME
FROM WIDE
AND GENERALIZE THE REST. LANDSCAPES TO LITTLE
GENERALIZE
LEARN, ABOVE ALL DETAILS. DON’T FOCUS UNDERSTAND
TO ONE ONLY.

4. BIG DATA
HOW TO DEAL WITH UNLESS YOU WOULD
BILLIONS AND BILLIONS DRASTICALLY SIMPLIFY
OF DATA, IN DIFFERENT THINGS. DO YOU REALLY
FORMATS, RAINING NEED ALL THE DATA?
SELECT WHAT IS
FROM EVERYWHERE AT IMPORTANT AND BE A PHILOSOPHER AND AN
ENGINEER AT THE SAME
DISCARD WHAT IS NOT.
PETABYTES/SEC? THINK MOSTLY ON HOW
TIME
TO MANAGE AND
ARCHIVE SIMPLIFY
IT’S SIMPLE: YOU CAN’T IMPLICATIONS, NOT ESTIMATE
DATA THEMSELVES

5. SMART
THINGS DON’T AIM TO PERFECTION. AIM
TO IMPERFECTION. AND HOW TO
YOU CAN BUILD THINGS AND DEAL WITH THAT. HOW TO
MACHINES, LOGICAL AND UNDERSTAND FAILURES AND
PHYSICAL ONES, WHO CAN MISTAKES INSTEAD OF NOT
(ALMOST) THINK AND ACT AS MAKING ONES
BE A PSYCOLOGIST AND AN
YOU NEED TO FOCUS
PERFECT HUMANS. ON HOW TO GIVE DATA
ENGINEER AT THE SAME
TIME
(UNDERSTANDING
ERRORS), RATHER
BUT ARE HUMANS PERFECT? THAN RECEIVING DATA FAIL
AS INPUTS. LEARN

6. EVERYTHING(*)
THAT MAKES
THAT GIVES TO BE
THINGS(**)
DATA MANAGED
MUST HAVE A
SENSOR
TO
FOR GIVING
EVERYTHING(*)
BETTER AND INFERRED
THAT MAKES
INFORMATION
THINGS(**)
(*) BETTER SAYING: EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE
(**) EVERYTHING IS A THING. EVEN LOGICAL ONES

7. A SOCIOLOGIST A LINGUIST
CONNECT SIMPLIFY
OPEN ESTIMATE
YOU
FAIL GENERALIZE
LEARN UNDERSTAND
A PSYCHOLOGIST A PHILOSOPHER

8. DON’T SPEND SO MUCH TIME
TO ANALYZE COMPLEXITY
SPEND TIME TO CONNECT
THINGS AND SIMPLIFY YOUR
DATA
PLUG AND
APPROXIMATE

9. YOU FAIL (SOMETIMES).
BUILD THINGS
THAT FAIL TOO
FROM DATA IN A NETWORK THAT IS OPEN AND CONNECTED
AND LET THEM
LEARN. AS YOU DO

10. CC BY 2.0
THANK YOU
ANY COMMENT/NSULT/REQUEST/REVIEW/KUDOS/QUESTION/SUGGESTION/.ETCETERA?
@andreagianotti | andrea.gianotti@live.it | skype:andrea.gianotti