1) Swiss actor Bruno Ganz played Adolf Hitler in the controversial 2004 film Downfall, which depicted the final days of Hitler's rule from his bunker in 1945. 2) The film sparked debate in Germany about whether it was acceptable to portray Hitler as a human being. Ganz said he focused on mimicking Hitler's physical mannerisms to avoid brooding on his deadly ideology. 3) The film was praised for its realistic portrayal of Hitler, though some critics felt it was too sympathetic to secondary Nazi characters. The director said that evil people are often charming and smiling, not easily recognized as monsters.

1. The dangers of portraying Hitler
Downfall film director said that "evil comes with a smiling face" as Bruno Ganz talks
about the problems of playing Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in his final days
By Sheila Johnston
10:03AM BST 30 Apr 2015
On April 30, 1945, Adolf Hitler
shot himself dead in his
underground bunker beneath
the Chancellery in Berlin. Eva
Braun, whom he had married
the previous day, died beside
him by taking a cyanide pill.
In this article, first published
in 2005, Swiss actor Bruno
Ganz, the man behind the
controversial film about Hitler called Downfall talked about the dangers of portraying him
as a human being
"Gentlemen," declared Joseph Goebbels in the final days of the Berlin bunker, "a hundred years
on, a splendid colour film will be shown about these terrible times we're living through." The
situation might seem desperate now, Hitler's Minister of Propaganda explained, but everyone just
needed to hold out a little longer. Because, a century on, audiences would whoop and whistle
when they saw their heroes on the silver screen.
Two weeks later, it was over. Hitler and his new wife, Eva Braun, were dead and Goebbels's own
wife, Magda, had poisoned their six apple-cheeked children rather than watch them grow up in a
world without National Socialism.
Still, at least the film, called Downfall, has arrived, a full four decades ahead of Goebbels's
schedule. It is, however, doubtful whether audiences will whoop and whistle at the sight of it.
It shows the Third Reich crumbling amid the bang of bombs and the whimper of recrimination. The
bunker's inmates quarrel and party in a grisly dance of death, while Hitler appears as a quivering
wreck, one minute blubbering in self-pity, the next mustering the energy to rant hatefully about the
Final Solution or tucking into ravioli. But in Germany the debate has raged over whether it is
permissible to portray Hitler as a human being at all.
That honour in Downfall belongs to the distinguished Swiss actor Bruno Ganz, possessor of the
mystical Iffland Ring, which for 200 years has been awarded to the most important German-
speaking actor of each generation.

2. Eva Braun (Juliane Koehler, left), Adolf Hitler
(Bruno Ganz, middle) and Albert Speer
(Heino Ferch) in Dow nfall
Ganz says that, of course he
shuddered, just as anyone
else would, at the role. "I
asked people I've known a
long time and whom I trust,
and they all advised me
against it," he told the
Süddeutsche Zeitung. "We've
internalised a kind of taboo
against playing him."
He was encouraged by the
wealth of source material: a rare tape-recording of Hitler speaking in his normal, non-demagogic
voice and the many personal memoirs by the people around him. They provided minute insights
into how Hitler walked, talked and cleared his throat. These, Ganz said, enabled him not to brood
too long on the man's deadly Weltanschauung but to concentrate instead on the way he held his
hands.
But, Ganz also adds, "people around me claim that, while making the film, I talked a lot about
Hitler, and not always with the proper, politically correct distance". And, when he said that he was
not ashamed to arouse pity for Hitler "for fractions of seconds", his cautious confession sent shock
waves rippling through the nation.
- the 23 best war movies
Apart from GW Pabst's 1955 film The Last Ten Days, the only previous German attempt to show
the Führer on screen has been Hans Juergen Syberberg's eccentric six-hour epic, Hitler, A Film
From Germany, made in 1977. Then, Syberberg agonised over how, or even whether, to depict
his protagonist. In the end,
Hitler was played by different actors, performed by puppets and even voiced by a ventriloquist's
doll. It was a low-budget, high-camp, extremely polemical tour through the German psyche and
the reasons for Hitler's hold over it.
Downfall is nothing like that. A relatively lavish £10 million production with a large cast, it's based
on historical sources: Inside Hitler's Bunker, by the scholar Joachim Fest, and Until the Final Hour,
by Traudl Junge, Hitler's private secretary. This time the aim, according to Bernd Eichinger, who
produced both it and Syberberg's film, is to "grip the viewer, without preaching at him".
Syberberg supports Downfall. He feels the time is now right to paint a realistic portrait of Hitler. Not
so another member of this older generation of German film-makers. In a passionate, very detailed
review in Die Zeit, Wim Wenders wrote that he had spent a sleepless night after seeing Downfall.
On a second viewing, he detected its absence of any strong point of view about Hitler which, in the
end, made him harmless.

3. Dow nfallw asnominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film
Wenders compared
Downfall unfavourably with
Resident Evil, a Hollywood
potboiler about flesh-eating
zombies. There, at least,
you knew who the baddies
were.
"Of course the film has a
point of view," counters Dr
Fest. "Hitler was a master
of that smooth Viennese
charm, especially towards
women. But just because
he was sometimes nice to
his secretary doesn't mean he was a humane person. To conclude that is simply silly. Wim
Wenders would have liked to make a film that attracted two million viewers. Downfall was seen by
five million Germans."
Many American critics, on the other hand, were more concerned by the film's sympathetic take on
some of the secondary characters. "Next to the Goebbelses and to Hitler, many of the others don't
look too bad," objected a typical review in The New York Times. "The movie is sending its
domestic audience the soothing message that ordinary Germans were above all the victims of
Nazism."
• The 10 most controversial films in cinema
Olivier Hirschbiegel, the director of Downfall, says:"They just got it wrong. Bad people do not walk
around with claws like vicious monsters, even though it might be comforting to think so. Everyone
intelligent knows that evil comes along with a smiling face."
He has dealt before with man's inhumanity to man in an earlier film - The Experiment, based on an
experiment in which students role-played guards and prisoners. Things quickly turned nasty and
the two-week test was terminated after six days.
"Evil seems to be the most powerful force at work in the world," says Hirschbiegel, who found the
shoot of Downfall deeply depressing. "You have to protect your soul. When I got home each day, I
took a long shower and listened to Johann Sebastian Bach, and that helped."
On one point, all agree: Hitler himself remains an enigma. Hirschbiegel quotes Sebastian Haffner's
book, The Meaning of Hitler. "He came to the conclusion that Hitler was like a shell. He had lots of
ways of seducing people; even his frequent self-pity was a weapon to make people respond. But
inside this shell you would find nothing. No warmth, no heart, no passion for anything, except an
enormous will for destruction."