This document provides an overview of the origins and early history of communist ideology and its bloody implementation under Lenin in Russia. It describes how Marx and Engels developed communist ideology based on materialist philosophy and Darwin's theory of evolution. Lenin led the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917 and established a brutal communist regime, carrying out mass executions and causing a famine that killed millions. The ideology viewed humans as animals and promoted conflict and violence, leading to tremendous bloodshed and suffering under Lenin's rule as he forcibly imposed communist policies.
Exposing Communist Strategy for One World, students beware, Christians read, Robert Powell
Exposing Communist Strategy by members who left the party. Showing political correctness to be a tool to implement attacks on religion, family, morality and more. Learn why what is happening, today comes from the past, not taught in most educational opportunities.
A comprehensive catalog of there various, ignominious racially prejudices pontificated by Karl Marx and Engels. This book is needed for those studying economics, Marxism, capitalism, wealth inequality, communism, income equality, and anthropology.
The roots of futures thinking – the imaging in human minds of the future – can be traced back to the beginnings of human societies. The formalized study of futures came much later, but it can be said that the most advanced civilizations tended to project their thinking and utilize basic methods of planning and foresight. Greek philosopher Plato developed the concept of an ideal society with perfect justice in "The Republic," and his vision inspired millions of thinkers to imagine the future.
Exposing Communist Strategy for One World, students beware, Christians read, Robert Powell
Exposing Communist Strategy by members who left the party. Showing political correctness to be a tool to implement attacks on religion, family, morality and more. Learn why what is happening, today comes from the past, not taught in most educational opportunities.
A comprehensive catalog of there various, ignominious racially prejudices pontificated by Karl Marx and Engels. This book is needed for those studying economics, Marxism, capitalism, wealth inequality, communism, income equality, and anthropology.
The roots of futures thinking – the imaging in human minds of the future – can be traced back to the beginnings of human societies. The formalized study of futures came much later, but it can be said that the most advanced civilizations tended to project their thinking and utilize basic methods of planning and foresight. Greek philosopher Plato developed the concept of an ideal society with perfect justice in "The Republic," and his vision inspired millions of thinkers to imagine the future.
Red Chinese persecution: Happy Camp, liquifying elderly for chicken feed / Mao Robert Powell
This materials is direct testimony in 1959. Exposing the Red Chinese persecution of their citizens. The Red Chinese value of life is essentially non-existant. The price of "Happy Camp" for elders. The Liquifying of the dead for chicken feed, and fertilizer.
Red Chinese persecution: Happy Camp, liquifying elderly for chicken feed / Mao Robert Powell
This materials is direct testimony in 1959. Exposing the Red Chinese persecution of their citizens. The Red Chinese value of life is essentially non-existant. The price of "Happy Camp" for elders. The Liquifying of the dead for chicken feed, and fertilizer.
Karl Marx Essay
Biography of Karl Marx Essay
Essay on Karl Marx
Karl Marx Essay
Karl Marx: Conflict Theory Essay
Research Paper On Karl Marx
Life of Karl Marx Essays
Karl Marx and Capitalism Essay
Karl Marx Essay example
Karl Marx Research Paper
Essay on karl marx
Karl Marx Essay
20th Century Cultural War,; The Frankfort School of Cultural Marxism and the ...Wayne Williams
Students will examine the history of the Frankfort School of Marxism and how it migrated to the U.S., and how this relates to social upheaval in today's America.
Essay On Scottish Independence. Essay - Scottish independence after Brexit - ...Alexandra Saunders
Scottish Independence-Discursive Essay - A-Level English - Marked by .... Scottish Independence - PHDessay.com. Essay - Scottish independence after Brexit - StuDocu. Introduction to the Scottish Wars of Independence. 05. Scottish independence; Bannockburn 1314 - 05. Scottish independence .... Scottish independence discursive essay planoutline. REVEALED: The Scottish Declaration Of Independence | HuffPost UK. Scottish Independence Sample - Scotland Essay Examples. Scottish Independence Essay Help - Read all of our Scottish .... scottishindependence. Gains of independence. Scotland People, Scottish Referendum, Scotland .... Scottish independence for and against essay marijua. Scottish Independence Essay Example Topics, Sample. Scottish Independence and the United Kingdom. Scotland Independence referendum outcome - ESL worksheet by CoLMC. REVEALED: The Scottish Declaration Of Independence. Scottish Independence Referendum Explained. Scotland makes formal request to UK for independence vote - Digital Journal. Should Scotland become an independent nation? - University Social .... Support for Scottish independence at record high. Scottish Independence, Optimism, About Uk, Scotland, Success, Sayings .... August 15, 2014 | Imagine. Here's How Britain's Newspapers Are Marking The Scottish Independence .... The Green Wave Gazette : Scotland Says “Nay” to Independence. Scottish independence discursive essay plan template. Scottish independence essay winners | Times Higher Education. Scots march for independence from UK in Glasgow. Sight Magazine - ESSAY: MANY SCOTS WANT INDEPENDENCE FROM THE UNITED .... Scottish Independence Holyrood Report: A Tale of Two Realities Essay On Scottish Independence Essay On Scottish Independence. Essay - Scottish independence after Brexit - StuDocu
1 Realism and Naturalism An Historical Context .docxmercysuttle
1
Realism and Naturalism: An Historical Context
Naturalism and Realism are literary movements which are
closely linked. Some writers, such as Guy de Maupassant, are
considered both naturalists and realists. Try to identify the
subtle differences between these two literary styles as you
read.
Definition of Realism
Encarta explains realism, saying,
Realist literature is defined particularly as the fiction produced in Europe and the
United States from about 1840 until the 1890s, when realism was superseded by
naturalism. This form of realism began in France in the novels of Gustave
Flaubert and the short stories of Guy de Maupassant. In Russia, realism was
represented in the plays and short stories of Anton Chekhov. The novelist
George Eliot introduced realism into English fiction; as she declared in Adam
Bede (1859), her purpose was to give a "faithful representation of commonplace
things." Mark Twain and William Dean Howells were the pioneers of realism in
the United States. One of the greatest realists of all, the Anglo-American novelist
Henry James, drew much inspiration from his mentors, Eliot and Howells . . . .
In general, the work of these writers illustrates the main tenet of realism, that
writers must not select facts in accord with preconceived aesthetic or ethical
ideals but must set down their observations impartially and objectively.
Concerned with the faithful representation of life, which frequently lacks form,
the realists tended to downplay plot in favor of character and to concentrate on
middle-class life and preoccupations, avoiding larger, more dramatic issues.
(para. 4-5)
Definition of Naturalism
The Naturalism movement in literature grew out of Realism. In “Literary Naturalism,” Bruce
Clary writes, “Naturalism is an extension or continuation of Realism with the addition of
materialistic determinism” (para. 1), which “is an application of scientific determinism to
fiction. Scientific determinism, which derived from Darwinian thought, is the belief that all
Bonjour, Monsieur Courbet, by Gustave
Courbet, 1854.
2
supposed acts of the will are actually the result of external forces that determine those acts”
(6).
Dr. Donna Campbell adds,
The term naturalism describes a type of literature that attempts to apply
scientific principles of objectivity and detachment to its study of human beings.
Unlike realism, which focuses on literary technique, naturalism implies a
philosophical position: for naturalistic writers, since human beings are, in Emile
Zola's [see the next section] phrase, "human beasts," characters can be studied
through their relationships to their surroundings (para. 1).
This method was influenced by a variety of people, including:
Claude Bernard (1813-1878): “Claude Bernard: A Brief Biography” states that Bernard
“was a French physiologist, one of the most important of all times, and who is
considered the ‘father’ ...
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
1. THE BLOODY HISTORY OF COMMUNISM – 1
Introduction
The 20th
century was the bloodiest in history. 250 million people died in wars, mass
slaughter and political murders.
The ideology known as “communism” bears the greatest responsibility for this terrible
savagery.
This is an ideology that promises so-called equality and justice, but which brings with it
only bloodshed, death and fear.
In this film, we shall be examining the bloody century of communism, and seeing the
terrible misery this ideology inflicted on humanity.
It will be impossible for the world to avoid similar tragedies in the future unless it learns
from the past.
GENERIC (PART 1 – FROM MARX TO STALIN)
THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY
It was the middle of the 19th
century.
Two German philosophers living in England were trying to formulate an ideology that
would rock the world. The first time they revealed their ideas was in the Communist manifesto,
which had been published some time before.
One of these two philosophers was Karl Heinrich Marx, the other Friedrich Engels.
These two believed in a philosophy known as materialism, which claims that nothing exists
apart from matter.
Actually, materialism was an ancient dogma which had been put forward by the Greek
thinker Democritus. During the French Revolution, however, a number of European thinkers
took materialism back off the shelf, dusted it off, and began to propagate it again. Their aim was
to do away with religious beliefs, and materialism was the only philosophy they could put up
against religion.
While supporting materialism on the one hand, Marx and Engels turned to a method
known as dialectics, which claimed that conflict was the basic law of nature. For that reason, their
theories came to be called dialectical materialism.
Dialectics was a hypothesis maintaining that all development in the universe comes about
as a result of conflict. The two philosophers attempted to interpret the history of the world in
terms of dialectical materialism. Marx wrote books on history and economics, attempting to
make these conform to that dogma, and Engels did the same for science and philosophy.
Furthermore, Marx tried to see into the future. In his view, the industrialized nations of
Europe would shortly undergo bloody revolutions, as a result of the dialectical principle of
2. conflict. The working class, oppressed by the capitalists, would rise up and seize power, after
which a communist system would be established. The concepts of religion, morality and the
family would have no place in this communist society.
Marx and Engels were faced with a major difficulty, however. They viewed human history
through the lens of dialectical materialism, even if they had to distort that history in the process.
But what about natural history? How had living things come into existence? There simply had to
be a materialistic answer to that important question.
That answer was provided by another ideologue, again living in England at the time.
As the Royal Navy vessel the Beagle crossed the Atlantic Ocean on its voyage of discovery,
it carried a young researcher on board: Charles Robert Darwin. After the long voyage on that
ship, he returned to London in 1836. He spent the rest of his life trying to formulate a theory to
explain how living things came into being.
Darwin unveiled his theory in The Origin of Species, published in 1859. In it, he maintained
that living things came into being in just the same way that materialist philosophy claimed, in
other words by a series of coincidences. What is more, he proposed that these coincidences
worked by means of conflict, as dialectic. In short, Darwin adapted nature to dialectical
materialism.
Darwin’s theory had no scientific foundation. That is why prominent scientists of the time
refused to take him seriously.
Apart from two people: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels!
Just one month after the publication of The Origin of Species, on December 12, 1859, Engels
began a letter to Marx with the words: "Darwin, whom I am just now reading, is splendid."
A letter from Marx to Engels shared the same excitement: "These last few weeks, I have
read all sorts of things. Among others, Darwin's book of Natural Selection... This is the book
which contains the basis in natural history for our view."
The relationship between Darwinism and Marxism grew eve stronger. Marxists adopted the
theory of evolution as their own scientific foundation. These duly spread under the influence of
Darwinism. The books of Marx and Darwin appeared together in communist posters of the time.
The Franco-Prussian War of 1871 allowed the first experiment in the revolution Marx had
dreamed of. France was defeated, and the imperial administration overthrown, leaving a power
vacuum. The Marxists seized their opportunity. Together with other small socialist groups, they
provoked an uprising in the capital, Paris, and established a ‘commune,’ an administration based
on communist principles. Under the new regime, Paris turned into a city of terror. Churches and
government buildings were torn apart. Men of religion were shot by the communards. The
streets were filled with barricades.
The commune was finally suppressed by government troops that entered Paris after lengthy
fighting. The first experiment in communism had left 18,000 dead behind it.
Yet how was it that Karl Marx’s theories were able to spread so quickly?
3. The answer to that question was provided by the famous German scientist Rudolf
Virchow. At a congress of naturalists, Virchow took the floor to warn those biologists who
supported Darwinism: “Be careful of this theory, for this theory is very nearly related to the
theory that caused so much dread in our neighboring country.”
Virchow was right. Darwin’s theory of evolution was of great importance in the spread of
Marxism among western intellectuals. The theory portrayed human beings as a species of animal,
claimed that they would develop by means of conflict, and most important of all, denied the idea
of creation. These three great errors formed the basis of Marxism.
The first of the communist revolutions built on that foundation, was to take place in
Russia.
The Bolshevik Terror
At the beginning of the 20th
century, Russia was ruled by the tsarist regime. However,
revolutionary communist ideas were beginning to spread among an increasing number of
workers. Part of the military apparatus had also come under the ideology’s influence.
The leader of the communist movement in Russia was Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.
The communist movement led by Lenin was known as the Bolsheviks. These believed that
a bloody revolution would be necessary for them to seize power. Despite the fact that they had
been illegally organizing for years, they had been unable to achieve their aim. The opportunity
they were looking for came in 1914 with the outbreak of the First World War.
That war was the bloodiest conflict that mankind had ever known. One of the countries
involved in that war, which cost the lives of 10 million people, was Russia. The Russians suffered
defeat after defeat in the first three years of fighting, and lost 2 million dead.
The suffering inflicted by the war dragged Russia towards revolution. In February, 1917,
army units in the capital, Petrograd, rebelled and took over the city. Tsar Nicholas II, who was at
the front encouraging his troops, set out for the city. His train was stopped by revolutionary
troops, however, and the tsar was arrested. All symbols of the tsarist regime were destroyed by
revolutionary soldiers. Supporters of the revolution rejoiced in the streets. Most people hoped
that the end of the tsarist regime would bring happier times for Russia.
But they were wrong.
The Bolshevik contribution to the February 1917 revolution was actually quite minimal.
They were poorly represented in the post-revolutionary Parliament that was set up. The
government passed into the hands of the pro-Western Kerensky, a democrat. Lenin, then in exile,
ordered his men to give the new government absolutely no support. He continued to organize
the Bolsheviks for his own revolution.
And in October, 1917, he struck.
Lenin’s armed militants attacked the Winter Palace, the center of government. They killed
those guards who resisted and carried out one of the easiest coups in history. Soviet propaganda
films made years after the event would portray the coup as a huge popular uprising started by
4. Lenin’s fiery speeches. The fact was though that the number of people who attacked the palace
was less than 100, and only five people died.
Lenin started with a silent coup. Yet things were not to remain so. The Bolsheviks attacked
those army units still loyal to the tsar. A terrible civil war began that would last for three long
years.
The Bolsheviks established the Red Army to prosecute that war. Lenin’s right-hand man,
Leon Trotsky, was placed at its head.
Red Army units and the secret police agency set up by Lenin, known as the Cheka, had no
compunction about using the most ruthless methods to deal with monarchists and other anti-
communist groups.
Tsar Nicholas II, his wife and five children were executed by order of Lenin. Those cities
which refused to support the Bolshevik regime were ruined.
In telegrams to his militants, Lenin ordered that all those who opposed the communist
regime should be shot. The Bolsheviks arrested tens of thousands of people for the crime of
‘opposing the regime.’ Most of these were tortured and executed en masse. The famous Russian
writer Maxim Gorky described examples of Bolshevik savagery:
In Tambov province Communists were nailed with railway spikes by their left hand and left
foot to trees a metre above the soil, and they watched the torments of these deliberately
oddly-crucified people. They would open a prisoner’s belly, take out the small intestine and
nailing it to a tree or telegraph pole they drove the man around the tree with blows,
watching the intestine unwind through the wound. Stripping a captured officer naked, they
tore strips of skin from his shoulders in the form of shoulder straps…
A terrible fear fell over Russia. But the communist savagery had only just begun.
Famine Caused by Lenin
When the Bolsheviks came to power, most of the population of Russia lived in the villages,
enjoying a pretty miserable standard of living. Most peasants were only just able to feed their
families with what they produced. The freezing Russian winters made productive agriculture an
impossibility.
A decision taken by Lenin in 1918 inflicted an even worse disaster on millions of peasants,
who were already living in poverty. Private property was forbidden, and the peasants’ goods were
to be confiscated by the state.
Lenin carried out that policy by means of another right-hand man, Felix Dzerzhinsky, the
head of the Cheka, well known for his ruthlessness. Cheka officers descended on villages all over
Russia and began rounding up peasants’ crops and livestock at gunpoint. A quota to be handed
over by every peasant and given to the Bolsheviks was drawn up. In order to meet that quota,
most of them had to give up all that they possessed.
Peasants who protested were silenced by the most savage means. On 14 February 1922 one
inspector, who visited the Omsk region, wrote:
5. Abuses of position by the requisitioning detachments, frankly speaking, have now reached
unbelievable levels. Systematically, the peasants who are arrested are all locked up in big
unheated barns; they are then whipped and threatened with execution. Those who have not
filled the whole of their quota are bound and forced to run naked all along the main street
of the village and then locked up in another unheated hangar…
Lenin was enraged when he realized that the quotas set for the villages would not be met.
In 1920, he inflicted a fearful punishment on some regions that had resisted the requisitions: Not
only would these peasants’ crops be seized, but also all the seeds they possessed. Confiscating the
seeds meant that the peasants would be unable to produce a new crop. In other words, they
would have nothing to eat.
Then the famine began. 29 million people within the borders of Russia battled with
starvation in 1921 and 1922. 5 million starved agonizingly to death.
Lenin watched what was happening with enormous pleasure. In his view, the famine was
most useful: he calculated that it would help to destroy peoples’ belief in God and religion, and
make them bow their heads to communism. In the Black Book of Communism, that sent shock
waves around the world, that devilish idea of Lenin’s is discussed thus:
As one of his friends later recalled, “Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov had the courage to come out
and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results... Famine, he
explained, ...would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the
stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith not only in the
tsar, but in God too.”
This is what Lenin wrote to the members of the Politbureau on March 19, 1922:
“The present moment favors us.... With the help of all those starving people who are
starting to eat each other, who are dying by the millions, and whose bodies litter the
roadside all over the country, it is now and only now that we can—and therefore must—
confiscate all church property with all the ruthless energy we can still muster. ...Our only
hope is the despair engendered in the masses by the famine, which will cause them to look
at us in a favorable light or, at the very least, with indifference.”
These communications in the Soviet archives have revealed that Lenin deliberately brought
about that dreadful famine which cost 5 million lives. That is the same conclusion arrived at by
the historian Richard Pipes, who spent years researching the archives, in his book The Unknown
Lenin. In his view:
For humankind at large Lenin had nothing but scorn: ... individual human beings held for
Lenin “almost no interest” and ... he treated the working class much as a metalworker
treated iron ore.
The Philosophy of Violence
The reason why Lenin and the other Bolsheviks were so utterly ruthless was the dialectical
materialist philosophy they so believed in. This philosophy regarded human beings as a kind of
6. animal and maintained that violence and conflict were necessary for the development of
mankind.
Not only did Lenin regard human beings as a species of animal, he also employed animal
methods to train them. In October, 1919, he paid a personal visit to the Russian scientist Ivan
Pavlov, famous for his conditioned reflex experiments on animals. Lenin wanted to impose these
conditioned reflex methods on the whole of Russian society. Pavlov was astounded:
“I want the masses of Russia to follow a Communistic pattern of thinking and reacting,”
Lenin explained. Pavlov was astounded. It seemed that Lenin wanted him to do for humans
what he had already done for dogs. “Do you mean that you would like to standardize the
population of Russia? Make them all behave in the same way?” he asked. “Exactly”, replied
Lenin. “Man can be corrected. Man can be made what we want him to be.”
The so-called scientific basis of that philosophy that regarded human beings as a species of
animal was Darwin’s theory of evolution.
The theory of evolution was the most important ideological inspiration behind the
communist movement in Russia. Darwin’s The Origin of Species was translated into Russian at the
end of the 19th
century, and was responsible for thousands of young Russians turning to atheism
and communism. Russian communism was so tied to Darwinism that Georgi Valentinovich
Plekhanov, widely regarded as the founder of the movement, clearly stated that he regarded
marxism as “Darwinism in its application to social science.”
Plekhanov’s student, Lenin, indeed applied Darwinism to society, and mercilessly
slaughtered whole societies he regarded as herds of animals.
The truth is that human beings are not a species of animal, but are honourable beings
created by God in possession of a soul. The reason for their existence on earth is not, as
communists and Darwinists would assert, conflict, war and bloodshed, but for them to display a
morality that is pleasing to God. Only when man has understood this concept, in other words
only when he lives by the true religion, will he find peace and happiness.
The end of Lenin, who denied that fact, is a terrible warning.
From 1922 on, an increasingly serious sickness slowly began to paralyse him. He spent
most of 1923 in a wheelchair, suffering from terrible headaches. In March 1923, he had a stroke,
and was thenceforth unable to speak normally. In the final months of his life, those who saw
Lenin were terrified: His face had taken on a peculiar expression, and he was half mad.
The final photograph taken of him shortly before his death was utterly ghastly. God speaks
of the fate of such cruel people in the Qur’an:
Then the final fate of those who did evil will be the worst because they denied God’s
Signs and mocked at them.(Qur’an, 30: 10)
Lenin died on January, 21, 1924.
The Bolsheviks organized a huge funeral ceremony for Lenin. The leaders of the
communist party decided to have his body, which had a tremendous importance for them,
embalmed.
7. Among those bearing Lenin’s coffin was the next dictator of Soviet Russia: Josef Stalin.
Stalin would rule Soviet Russia for nearly 30 years, and establish a regime of such
bloodshed and terror that would even surpass that of Lenin.
All the historical facts we have so far considered have an important moral for mankind.
False ideas can lead to disasters for people and societies. Communism is one such false idea, and
it inflicted dreadful suffering on the world during the 20th
century.
One of the fundamental errors of communism is that it believes conflict to be an
unchanging law of nature. The so-called scientific justification for this view is found in the theory
of evolution, which says that the differences between people necessarily lead to war, fighting and
conflict. According to this view, called dialectics, every class, every nation and every society is
obliged to fight every other one, and this is a law of nature.
That view stamped its mark all over the 20th
century, and is the common inspiration behind
both the communist savagery we have seen in this film, and also behind that of fascism, which
appears to be the complete opposite of communism.
It is only possible for mankind to escape this cycle of violence by coming to know the
purpose behind his existence. Human beings are not a species of animal that emerged by chance
and live only to fight, as Darwinists, communists and fascists believe. Human beings are noble
beings, created by God and possessing His soul. And the purpose of man is to learn and live by
that pleasing morality that God has taught him.
In the next section, we shall continue to examine the disasters that communist ideology,
which rejects that truth, has inflicted on humanity.
The Bloody History of Communism – Part 2
Stalin’s regime of fear, death camps, and secret murders …
The Soviet Russian genocide of Muslims …
Stalin’s scientists killed for refusing to accept the theory of evolution …
Do not miss The Bloody History of Communism – Part 2