TERMINAL AIB*
•Presented by:
• Rakesh Sasapu
•College: NICMAR-Goa
•Course: PG-ACM
•Presented at: NIRMAN ‘13
AIRPORT
Land-side
Terminal
Building
Parking
Service
facilities
Public transit
stations
Loading,
unloading area
Air-side
Terminal
Building
Runway
Taxi-way
Apron
Hangers
• In 1920’s, air travel is only for the super-rich.
• 1933 a young man, Morris Jackaman want to give something
revolutionary to the Beehive Gatwick that is the TERMINAL.
• Developed the idea of a circular terminal building reputedly in
response to a throwaway comment by his father.
• His idea had revolutionised the entire airport history.
• It was the world's first fully integrated airport building and working
terminal.
• Advantages claimed for the design included efficient use of space and
greater safety of aircraft movements.
• But we all know that as the sizes increases the there will be a lots of
wastage in the interior.
• So in later years all (almost) the designs are based on simple
rectangular.
• As the passenger population is increasing
the demand of air traffic is also increased.
• This creates the a large planes into occupy
the less space in the terminal.
• So therefore the terminal started to grow
up (or) expanding.
• After a certain extent limit, this extension
turned into division.
• Confusedness to costumers
• Eg. MT East – Ter. 3 – Strand 6 – Pos. 2
• Multiple terminal will have multiple Entry/Exit.
• Passenger service facilities will not be same at
all terminals.
• Security problems
• Connectivity – ITS (Internal Transport System)
• Make airport centralized as UNIT TERMINAL SYSTEM (UTS).
• Such that all the previous disadvantages can be overcome.
• The other problems which arise with UTS, should also be
compensated.
• Flexibility
• Expandability
• Aesthetics
• Integrity & compactness
• Low cost airport
• An unique shape is required that can make all the
problem the end.
• In search of this all the geometric/man made shapes
were tested.
• Every shape was tested through all the different
properties.
• For so the software used was Auto-Turn & Auto-Trace.
• After a 5 year research on these shapes we came to
final phase of design only 2 years before.
• We were revolving around this
shape but didn’t exactly found.
• At last we found and gave a exact
proposed shape.
• This shape is the mixture of the old
circular & the present rectangular
terminal.
1. Flexibility
2. Expansibility
3. Aesthetic considerations
4. Compactness & Integrity
5. Low cost Airport
• The size can be re-adjustable.
• It has high degree of flexibility, without wasting the interior valuable space.
It can be designed according to the passenger population and air traffic.
• The central part is provided with atrium. It has a flexibility to mount the ATC
Tower (Air Traffic Control) through the atrium.
• This will give the airport a complete patrol and control, since it is in the
Center.
• It is greatly expandable according to passenger population in
future.
• It gives the provision for expansion, since it has no end walls that
needs to be demolished at the time of expansion.
• It is also designed in such a way the junctions the shear forces are
made zero, with the unique design concept of di-eccentric loading.
• It will be very beautiful to watch, since our eyes are will be delightful
to watch the symmetric objects.
• It is perfectly symmetric and it continuous to maintain its symmetric
nature with its expansion.
• At any course of time it does not divert from symmetric. It has also
uniqueness that it has given provision for ATC tower.
• Making it look like gesture and has a miniature effect.
• As if it is guided with green building concept, it look even more
beautiful.
• It is a single component and it maintains with expansion.
• So therefore there will not any kind of division (or) partition during
the course of time.
• It look very compacted towards the Center.
• And fortunate to have like it one.
• All the airport related activities can be performed inside the
terminal building and maintains high level of security.
• Since the design is very flexible and easy to implement, there is no need
for spending money for design consultant.
• This can be implemented at any level of population. So easy to design,
build and renovate.
• This all properties makes this shape can be used in low cost airports.
• And it will be very applicable in India, since recently in 12 five year plan
2012-2017 the central govt. has identified 42 locations for low cost
airports.
• To known the actual capacity.
• The present design is compared with the Mumbai International
Terminal (MIT).
• Present capacity – 18 Boing 747
• Our present design – 35 Airbus A380 = 50 Boing 747
• This done by raster modelling with tracing.
• Max. Capacity – 86 A380
Planes
• Max. payload passengers –
86*605,000 kg
• Expansion ratio from Max. to
Present = 5.8
• All the 32 emergency exits are
provided at its max. extends.
• 1 Control Tower can be
mounted.
TERMINAL AIB
TERMINAL AIB
TERMINAL AIB

TERMINAL AIB

  • 1.
  • 2.
    •Presented by: • RakeshSasapu •College: NICMAR-Goa •Course: PG-ACM •Presented at: NIRMAN ‘13
  • 4.
  • 5.
    • In 1920’s,air travel is only for the super-rich. • 1933 a young man, Morris Jackaman want to give something revolutionary to the Beehive Gatwick that is the TERMINAL. • Developed the idea of a circular terminal building reputedly in response to a throwaway comment by his father. • His idea had revolutionised the entire airport history. • It was the world's first fully integrated airport building and working terminal.
  • 6.
    • Advantages claimedfor the design included efficient use of space and greater safety of aircraft movements. • But we all know that as the sizes increases the there will be a lots of wastage in the interior. • So in later years all (almost) the designs are based on simple rectangular.
  • 7.
    • As thepassenger population is increasing the demand of air traffic is also increased. • This creates the a large planes into occupy the less space in the terminal. • So therefore the terminal started to grow up (or) expanding. • After a certain extent limit, this extension turned into division.
  • 8.
    • Confusedness tocostumers • Eg. MT East – Ter. 3 – Strand 6 – Pos. 2 • Multiple terminal will have multiple Entry/Exit. • Passenger service facilities will not be same at all terminals. • Security problems • Connectivity – ITS (Internal Transport System)
  • 10.
    • Make airportcentralized as UNIT TERMINAL SYSTEM (UTS). • Such that all the previous disadvantages can be overcome. • The other problems which arise with UTS, should also be compensated. • Flexibility • Expandability • Aesthetics • Integrity & compactness • Low cost airport
  • 11.
    • An uniqueshape is required that can make all the problem the end. • In search of this all the geometric/man made shapes were tested. • Every shape was tested through all the different properties. • For so the software used was Auto-Turn & Auto-Trace. • After a 5 year research on these shapes we came to final phase of design only 2 years before.
  • 12.
    • We wererevolving around this shape but didn’t exactly found. • At last we found and gave a exact proposed shape. • This shape is the mixture of the old circular & the present rectangular terminal.
  • 13.
    1. Flexibility 2. Expansibility 3.Aesthetic considerations 4. Compactness & Integrity 5. Low cost Airport
  • 15.
    • The sizecan be re-adjustable. • It has high degree of flexibility, without wasting the interior valuable space. It can be designed according to the passenger population and air traffic. • The central part is provided with atrium. It has a flexibility to mount the ATC Tower (Air Traffic Control) through the atrium. • This will give the airport a complete patrol and control, since it is in the Center.
  • 16.
    • It isgreatly expandable according to passenger population in future. • It gives the provision for expansion, since it has no end walls that needs to be demolished at the time of expansion. • It is also designed in such a way the junctions the shear forces are made zero, with the unique design concept of di-eccentric loading.
  • 18.
    • It willbe very beautiful to watch, since our eyes are will be delightful to watch the symmetric objects. • It is perfectly symmetric and it continuous to maintain its symmetric nature with its expansion. • At any course of time it does not divert from symmetric. It has also uniqueness that it has given provision for ATC tower. • Making it look like gesture and has a miniature effect. • As if it is guided with green building concept, it look even more beautiful.
  • 19.
    • It isa single component and it maintains with expansion. • So therefore there will not any kind of division (or) partition during the course of time. • It look very compacted towards the Center. • And fortunate to have like it one. • All the airport related activities can be performed inside the terminal building and maintains high level of security.
  • 20.
    • Since thedesign is very flexible and easy to implement, there is no need for spending money for design consultant. • This can be implemented at any level of population. So easy to design, build and renovate. • This all properties makes this shape can be used in low cost airports. • And it will be very applicable in India, since recently in 12 five year plan 2012-2017 the central govt. has identified 42 locations for low cost airports.
  • 22.
    • To knownthe actual capacity. • The present design is compared with the Mumbai International Terminal (MIT). • Present capacity – 18 Boing 747 • Our present design – 35 Airbus A380 = 50 Boing 747 • This done by raster modelling with tracing.
  • 25.
    • Max. Capacity– 86 A380 Planes • Max. payload passengers – 86*605,000 kg • Expansion ratio from Max. to Present = 5.8 • All the 32 emergency exits are provided at its max. extends. • 1 Control Tower can be mounted.