Primeiro Roadshow no Brasil, na capital Brasília, do lançamento oficial do Liferay Enterprise 6. Abertura Bruno Farache, Liferay, e Clédiston, SEA Tecnologia.
Loomio how to Series - Creating a new Group of PeopleSEA Tecnologia
Loomio is an online platform for collaborative decisions. In this tutorial, we discuss how to create a new group o people interested on a common subject.
Primeiro Roadshow no Brasil, na capital Brasília, do lançamento oficial do Liferay Enterprise 6. Abertura Bruno Farache, Liferay, e Clédiston, SEA Tecnologia.
Loomio how to Series - Creating a new Group of PeopleSEA Tecnologia
Loomio is an online platform for collaborative decisions. In this tutorial, we discuss how to create a new group o people interested on a common subject.
EarthCube Community Webinar 12.19.13: NSF EarthCube Funding Solicitation 13-529EarthCube
Slides were presented by Eva Zanzerkia (NSF EarthCube Program Officer) and M. Lee Allison (EarthCube Test Enterprise Governance [ECTEG] Project PI, University of Arizona) during the EarthCube Community Webinar on December 19, 2013. Content includes an overview of the NSF EarthCube Funding Soliciation 13-529 (Amendment III), an announcement of the ECTEG Advisory Committee, and a list of upcoming virtual and in-person avenues to participate in the co-creation of EarthCube.
05.06.2014 Community Webinar: Governance Update and Call for InputEarthCube
EarthCube Community Webinar, held on May 6, 2014 at 9:00am PDT.
This webinar discusses recent advances in the Test Governance Project and provides information about concrete ways that the community can help inform EarthCube governance through several activities over the coming month.
CREW (Collaborative Research Events on the Web) aims to improve access to research event content by capturing and publishing the scholarly communication that occurs at events like conferences and workshops. This is a Virtual Research Environment funded by JISC within the UK.
This slide show describes release 5 of the development. See site: http://www.crew-vre.net/
EarthCube Monthly Community Webinar- Nov. 22, 2013EarthCube
This webinar features project overviews of all EarthCube Awards (Building Blocks, Research Coordination Networks, Conceptual Designs, and Test Governance), followed by a call for involvement, and a Q&A session.
Agenda:
EarthCube Awards – Project Overviews
1.. EarthCube Web Services (Building Block)
2. EC3: Earth-Centered Community for Cyberinfrastructure (RCN)
3. GeoSoft (Building Block)
4. Specifying and Implementing ODSIP (Building Block)
5. A Broker Framework for Next Generation Geoscience (BCube) (Building Block)
6. Integrating Discrete and Continuous Data (Building Block)
7. EAGER: Collaborative Research (Building Block)
8. A Cognitive Computer Infrastructure for Geoscience (Building Block)
9. Earth System Bridge (Building Block)
10. CINERGI – Community Inventory of EC Resources for Geoscience Interoperability (BB)
11. Building a Sediment Experimentalist Network (RCN)
12. C4P: Collaboration and Cyberinfrastructure for Paleogeosciences (RCN)
13. Developing a Data-Oriented Human-centric Enterprise for Architecture (CD)
14. Enterprise Architecture for Transformative Research and Collaboration (CD)
15. EC Test Enterprise Governance: An Agile Approach (Test Governance)
A Call for Involvement!
EarthCube Community Webinar held Tuesday, Dec. 9th at 11:00 PST/2:00 EST for a virtual kick-off of the new 'Demonstration Phase' of EarthCube, including statements from your Leadership Council members and an update from NSF Program Officer, Eva Zanzerkia.
Approaches to supporting Open Educational Resource projectsR. John Robertson
Approaches to supporting Open Educational Resource projects, OCWC2010 Hanoi, May 5-7 2010.
R. John Robertson1, Sheila MacNeill1, Phil Barker2, Lorna Campbell1 and Li Yuan3
1Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement, University of Strathclyde, 2Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, 3Institute for Cybernetic Education, University of Bolton
Abstract— Prototyping is an important technique to reduce the cost and risk involved in developing complex systems like the Radio or Optical Telescopes and other Astronomical Observatory tools. Basically, it includes designing a small scale version of a complex system in order to acquire critical knowledge required to build the real system. The prototyping process takes time, involves many persons and if inappropriate or inadequate knowledge is gathered it can lead project managers and end users to make false assumptions about vital characteristics of a system, thereby consequently setting up the stage for a project failure. In this paper, we focused on the basic design concepts adopted in the course of constructing an indigenous 6m Radio Telescope. We present various rapid prototyping techniques for exploring ideas quickly and inexpensively in the early stages of design, which is paper and pencil. Software prototyping techniques which require interactive simulations are briefly highlighted.
EarthCube Governance Intro for Solar Terrestrial End-user WorkshopEarthCube
Presentation by the EarthCube Test Enterprise Governance project for the Solar Terrestrial Research End-User Workshop, Newark, New Jersey, August 14, 2014.
Lee Allison, PI of the EarthCube Test Enterprise Governance Project, leads the EarthCube Townhall at ESIP Summer Meeting 2014.
This presentation covers a brief introduction to EarthCube, the EarthCube journey to the All-Hands Meeting, outcomes of the All-Hands Meeting, and ways to participate in the demonstration governance.
Email all questions to anna.katz@azgs.az.gov.
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10ekunnen
This panel discussion will highlight several institutions that are using Project ASTRO on their production systems. Each institution will describe how Project ASTRO is being used to make data driven decisions for reporting, advocacy, targeted messaging, ROI, and more! The session will end with a review of the next phase of the Project ASTRO roadmap.
This presentation was provided by Kristi Holmes of Northwestern University during the NISO hot topic virtual conference "Effective Data Management," which was held on September 29, 2021.
Search-based Software Testing (SBST) '22
Workshop Co-Chairs:
Giovani Guizzo
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
Sebastiano Panichella
ZURICH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCE, SWITZERLAND
Competition Co-Chairs:
Alessio Gambi
UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU, GERMANY
Gunel Jahangirova
UNIVERSITÀ DELLA SVIZZERA ITALIANA, SWITZERLAND
Vincenzo Riccio
UNIVERSITÀ DELLA SVIZZERA ITALIANA, SWITZERLAND
Fiorella Zampetti
UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO, ITALY
Website Chair:
Rebecca Moussa
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
Program Committee:
Nazareno Aguirre, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto - CONICET, Argentina
Aldeida Aleti, Monash University, Australia
Giuliano Antoniol, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada
Kate Bowers, Oakland University, USA
Jose Campos, University of Washington, USA
Thelma E. Colanzi, State University of Maringá, Brazil
Byron DeVries, Grand Valley State University, USA
Gordon Fraser, University of Passau, Germany
Erik Fredericks, Oakland University, USA
Gregory Gay, Chalmers and the University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Alessandra Gorla, IMDEA Software Institute, Spain
Gregory Kapfhammer, Allegheny College, USA
Yiling Lou, Peking University, China
Mitchell Olsthoorn, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Justyna Petke, University College London, UK
Silvia R. Vergilio, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil
Simone do Rocio Senger de Souza, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Thomas Vogel, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
Jie Zhang, University College London, UK
EarthCube Community Webinar 12.19.13: NSF EarthCube Funding Solicitation 13-529EarthCube
Slides were presented by Eva Zanzerkia (NSF EarthCube Program Officer) and M. Lee Allison (EarthCube Test Enterprise Governance [ECTEG] Project PI, University of Arizona) during the EarthCube Community Webinar on December 19, 2013. Content includes an overview of the NSF EarthCube Funding Soliciation 13-529 (Amendment III), an announcement of the ECTEG Advisory Committee, and a list of upcoming virtual and in-person avenues to participate in the co-creation of EarthCube.
05.06.2014 Community Webinar: Governance Update and Call for InputEarthCube
EarthCube Community Webinar, held on May 6, 2014 at 9:00am PDT.
This webinar discusses recent advances in the Test Governance Project and provides information about concrete ways that the community can help inform EarthCube governance through several activities over the coming month.
CREW (Collaborative Research Events on the Web) aims to improve access to research event content by capturing and publishing the scholarly communication that occurs at events like conferences and workshops. This is a Virtual Research Environment funded by JISC within the UK.
This slide show describes release 5 of the development. See site: http://www.crew-vre.net/
EarthCube Monthly Community Webinar- Nov. 22, 2013EarthCube
This webinar features project overviews of all EarthCube Awards (Building Blocks, Research Coordination Networks, Conceptual Designs, and Test Governance), followed by a call for involvement, and a Q&A session.
Agenda:
EarthCube Awards – Project Overviews
1.. EarthCube Web Services (Building Block)
2. EC3: Earth-Centered Community for Cyberinfrastructure (RCN)
3. GeoSoft (Building Block)
4. Specifying and Implementing ODSIP (Building Block)
5. A Broker Framework for Next Generation Geoscience (BCube) (Building Block)
6. Integrating Discrete and Continuous Data (Building Block)
7. EAGER: Collaborative Research (Building Block)
8. A Cognitive Computer Infrastructure for Geoscience (Building Block)
9. Earth System Bridge (Building Block)
10. CINERGI – Community Inventory of EC Resources for Geoscience Interoperability (BB)
11. Building a Sediment Experimentalist Network (RCN)
12. C4P: Collaboration and Cyberinfrastructure for Paleogeosciences (RCN)
13. Developing a Data-Oriented Human-centric Enterprise for Architecture (CD)
14. Enterprise Architecture for Transformative Research and Collaboration (CD)
15. EC Test Enterprise Governance: An Agile Approach (Test Governance)
A Call for Involvement!
EarthCube Community Webinar held Tuesday, Dec. 9th at 11:00 PST/2:00 EST for a virtual kick-off of the new 'Demonstration Phase' of EarthCube, including statements from your Leadership Council members and an update from NSF Program Officer, Eva Zanzerkia.
Approaches to supporting Open Educational Resource projectsR. John Robertson
Approaches to supporting Open Educational Resource projects, OCWC2010 Hanoi, May 5-7 2010.
R. John Robertson1, Sheila MacNeill1, Phil Barker2, Lorna Campbell1 and Li Yuan3
1Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement, University of Strathclyde, 2Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, 3Institute for Cybernetic Education, University of Bolton
Abstract— Prototyping is an important technique to reduce the cost and risk involved in developing complex systems like the Radio or Optical Telescopes and other Astronomical Observatory tools. Basically, it includes designing a small scale version of a complex system in order to acquire critical knowledge required to build the real system. The prototyping process takes time, involves many persons and if inappropriate or inadequate knowledge is gathered it can lead project managers and end users to make false assumptions about vital characteristics of a system, thereby consequently setting up the stage for a project failure. In this paper, we focused on the basic design concepts adopted in the course of constructing an indigenous 6m Radio Telescope. We present various rapid prototyping techniques for exploring ideas quickly and inexpensively in the early stages of design, which is paper and pencil. Software prototyping techniques which require interactive simulations are briefly highlighted.
EarthCube Governance Intro for Solar Terrestrial End-user WorkshopEarthCube
Presentation by the EarthCube Test Enterprise Governance project for the Solar Terrestrial Research End-User Workshop, Newark, New Jersey, August 14, 2014.
Lee Allison, PI of the EarthCube Test Enterprise Governance Project, leads the EarthCube Townhall at ESIP Summer Meeting 2014.
This presentation covers a brief introduction to EarthCube, the EarthCube journey to the All-Hands Meeting, outcomes of the All-Hands Meeting, and ways to participate in the demonstration governance.
Email all questions to anna.katz@azgs.az.gov.
Project ASTRO Reporting Success Stories and the Next Phase - BbWorld10ekunnen
This panel discussion will highlight several institutions that are using Project ASTRO on their production systems. Each institution will describe how Project ASTRO is being used to make data driven decisions for reporting, advocacy, targeted messaging, ROI, and more! The session will end with a review of the next phase of the Project ASTRO roadmap.
This presentation was provided by Kristi Holmes of Northwestern University during the NISO hot topic virtual conference "Effective Data Management," which was held on September 29, 2021.
Search-based Software Testing (SBST) '22
Workshop Co-Chairs:
Giovani Guizzo
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
Sebastiano Panichella
ZURICH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCE, SWITZERLAND
Competition Co-Chairs:
Alessio Gambi
UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU, GERMANY
Gunel Jahangirova
UNIVERSITÀ DELLA SVIZZERA ITALIANA, SWITZERLAND
Vincenzo Riccio
UNIVERSITÀ DELLA SVIZZERA ITALIANA, SWITZERLAND
Fiorella Zampetti
UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO, ITALY
Website Chair:
Rebecca Moussa
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
Program Committee:
Nazareno Aguirre, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto - CONICET, Argentina
Aldeida Aleti, Monash University, Australia
Giuliano Antoniol, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada
Kate Bowers, Oakland University, USA
Jose Campos, University of Washington, USA
Thelma E. Colanzi, State University of Maringá, Brazil
Byron DeVries, Grand Valley State University, USA
Gordon Fraser, University of Passau, Germany
Erik Fredericks, Oakland University, USA
Gregory Gay, Chalmers and the University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Alessandra Gorla, IMDEA Software Institute, Spain
Gregory Kapfhammer, Allegheny College, USA
Yiling Lou, Peking University, China
Mitchell Olsthoorn, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Justyna Petke, University College London, UK
Silvia R. Vergilio, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil
Simone do Rocio Senger de Souza, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Thomas Vogel, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
Jie Zhang, University College London, UK
Similar to Technology and Architecture Committee meeting slides 10.06.14 (20)
AHM 2014: Integrated Data Management System for Critical Zone ObservatoriesEarthCube
Presentation by Anthony Aufdenkampe during the Addressing Data Heterogeneity, Semantic Building Bloack & CI Perspective Session on Day 2, June 25 at the EarthCube All-Hands Meeting
AHM 2014: OceanLink, Smart Data versus Smart Applications EarthCube
Presentation given by Krysztof Janowicz and Pascal Hitzler in the afternoon Architecture Forum Session on Day 1, June 24, at the EarthCube All-Hands Meeting.
AHM 2014: Enterprise Architecture for Transformative Research and Collaborati...EarthCube
Ilya Zaslavsky, David Valentine, Amarnath Gupta, Stephen Richard, Tanu Malik
Presentation given in the afternoon Architecture Forum Session on Day 1, June 24 at the EarthCube All-Hands Meeting
AHM 2014: Governance and Cyberinfrastructure in the Earth System SciencesEarthCube
Paul Edwards, a keynote speaker at the EarthCube All-Hands Meeting, shares an interesting viewpoint, sharing what social scientists have learned about governance in cyberinfrastructure and how those lessons may apply to EarthCube.
AHM 2014: Session 1 "Governance and Chartering EarthCube"EarthCube
Lee Allison, PI of the EarthCube Test Enterprise Governance Project, provides an introduction to the Draft Governance Charter, which was developed by the EarthCube community, and further refined with more community feedback. The presentation covers all aspects of the Draft Charter and how we will be 'tackling the tough issues' throughout the meeting and coming year to continue to develop EarthCube governance.
AHM 2014: The EarthCube Journey: How We Got HereEarthCube
Lee Allison, ECTEG PI, provides an overview of the EarthCube journey, from its beginning, and how we got to the All-Hands Meeting.
This presentation was given in the morning plenary of Day 1, June 24th.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
2. 1. Introduction and Welcome
2. Announcement of Committee Rep.
3. Internal Leadership
1. Responsibilities and Structure
4. Timeline for upcoming Milestones and Deliverables
5. Meeting Schedule Moving Forward
6. Conclusions and Actions
AGENDA
3. Coordinating with the Leadership Council to ensure
responsiveness to the EarthCube strategic direction
Monitoring and coordinating Working Groups
Sponsoring ad hoc Working Groups that emerge, described
in more detail in the Working Groups Annex
Coordinating with the Liaison Team and Engagement Team
Coordinating with other Standing Committees
COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS (ALL)
4. 1. Ensure the explicit connection between the scientific process and technical function, including
coordinating testbeds and other mechanisms for development of cyberinfrastructure components,
for use in science use cases
2. Seek alignment of EarthCube funded projects to foster integrated technology to meet end user
requirements and create new capabilities to enable transformative geoscience research
3. Provide stewardship of an EarthCube architecture
4. Address how EarthCube will accommodate or incorporate different standards and standards bodies
5. Identify gaps in coverage of needed cyberinfrastructure capabilities, and determine
recommendations on how to fill them
6. Monitor technical requirements with the goal to ensure EarthCube is meeting their needs
7. Serve as an emissary between software developers, the science community, and infrastructure, as
well as educators
8. Encourage, engage, and enable the next generation of EarthCube technology leadership
9. Coordinate with the Technical Funded Team
TECHNOLOGY STANDING COMMITTEE
FUNCTIONS
5. Begin facilitating community convergence on an
EarthCube Architecture
Coordinating a testbed for EarthCube components
COMMUNITY SUGGESTED PRIORITIES
6. Problem 1: Scientific reproducibility, including benchmarking
capabilities.
Problem 2: Interdisciplinary communication.
Problem 3. Model-data integration.
Problem 4. Data and software management.
Interaction w/ Conceptual Design and building block projects
7. General Membership Direct Election
Model
Council
Direct election by membership
Chair Co-Chair Secretary
Additional Officers
8. General Membership
Council
Direct election by membership
Chair Co-Chair Secretary
Appointment by council
Appointed Officers
GSA Model
9. Assembly
General Membership
ESIP internal representative selection
Elected by Assembly vote
President Vice-President
ESIP Model
ESIP ESIP ESIP
10. Voting Member
Representatives
Member Institutions
Elected by Voting Member representatives
President Vice-President
IRIS Model
IRIS member internal selection
Institution
Representative
Institution
Representative
Institution
Representative
11. General Membership
Council
Direct election by membership
President-elect
Section Heads
AGU Model
Board of Directors
Additional Officers
President
Directors
Additional Officers
Editor's Notes
Make sure we explain the logic behind the agenda, and the sequence of the conversations. We are starting with Functions and Priorities, digging into what those really mean for this group. Then moving onto discussion about leadership, informed by the previous discussions.
Hello, my name is Anna Katz and as Lee mentioned, I work as a project coordinator within the EarthCube Office. I’d like to take a quick step back and explain what we hope to get out of the next portion of the meeting. In this next part of the meeting, we’ll be covering the functions and priority issues for the Science Committee. We’ll first go over the priorities and functions as they are spelled out in then Demonstration Governance Charter. We’ll then dedicate group discussion time to really dive deep into what those functions and priorities really mean to a group like ours, what actions must be taken, and if there are any evident gaps. Finally, we’ll move the conversation toward the structure and leadership of this Committee, building off of the Priority and Functions conversation
As the demonstration governance structure showed, there are 3 standing committees. This is the language from the Charter that outlines the functions of ALL Committees. And The emphasis here in on coordination among the different governance bodies. There was strong consensus behind the idea that not one of these groups should be acting alone, and that consistent and effective communication should be present between all groups. So as you can see, this involves the Science Committee to coordinate with group like the Leadership Council, Working Groups, Liaison and Engagement Team, as well as the other Standing Committees. It is also important to note: cross membership is encouraged
Language in charter that outlines the functions specific to the Technology and Architecture Standing Committee. Note: highlight function to work with funded projects to make sure end-user requirement are met.
Through the All-Hands Meeting governance sessions, the community brainstormed and discussed high priority issues that they felt EarthCube Demonstration Governance should address in the coming year. On the final day, these priorities were refined and then assigned to a standing body within the Governance Structure. These priorities are what the community at the All-Hands Meeting thought would be best for the Science Committee to begin addressing.
It is important to note that these priority issues this is just one example, or a starting point, that came out of the All-Hands Meeting. Further priorities and action plans can be discussed during this meeting’s discussion time and further down the road. These priority issues are:
Develop a strategy and priorities for use cases and scientific engagement first by reviewing the End-User Workshops and then recommending and pursuing follow on activities
The Engagement of Scientific Community and incorporated them into the structure of the work groups