SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CLIENTPREPARED BY
REVIEWED BY
APPROVED BY
APPROVAL DATE
SMA
HBN
FEBRUARY 10-2015
CLIENT
CONTRACT NO.
WORK ORDER NO.
COSM REFERENCE NO.
PCSB - Tangga Barat
NA
NA
NA
DOCUMENTRELEASEDATE
REVISION NO.
DISTRIBUTION LIST :
OIM/PS - TBC - PCSB
Operations Engr. - PCSB
APC Manager - PCSB
Tech. Manager - COSM
REFERENCES :
1. Hach Digital Titrator 16900 Manual
2. Rohrback Cosasco Systems Corrosion Note
3. Draeger Gas Pump Manual
4. J Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Volume 20, No 6
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This document contains information proprietary to CLARIANT. Reproduction, disclosure
or use of this document in whole or in part is prohibited without express written consent of CLARIANT
Technical Director. This document is also an unpublished work of CLARIANT. CLARIANT owns allrights to
this work and intends to maintain this work confidential. CLARIANT may also seek to protect this work as
an unpublished copyright in order to maintain the work as confidential information and as a trade secret.
In the event of either inadvertent or deliberate publication, CLARIANT intends to enforce its rights to this
work under the copyright laws as a published work. Internal use of this document is restricted to person(s)
or department(s) in the distribution list.
FEBRUARY 10-2015
2
ARY
PCSB - PMO TANGGA BARAT ACIDIC WATER RECONFIRMATION & REASSESSMENT PROGRAM
TECHNICAL REPORT
5. Engineered NFA Injection Program
•	 Injection Method :chemical is injected continuously at 0.4 to 0.7% based on total
produced fluids volume.Estimated usage is 300 to 540 L/day (based on 119 kL/d).If
2 injection points are set-up,then this volume will be split between the two injection
locations.Note that dosage is calculated based on lab data.Based on previous work,
actual field dosage is a multiplier of 2 to 2.5.This will need to be confirmed during
actual injection in the plant.
•	 Injection Pumps :the chemical in itself is high pH (11),hence is corrosive.The
injection pump specification (all wet contact surfaces and seals) must be able to
withstand high pH exposure.RECOMMEND SPECIFIC PUMP HERE.
•	 Injection Points :upstream HP Production Header (line number 350-PG- 04064-
63420X) and LP Production Header (line number 450-PG-04065-63420X) at TBDR.
Since the chemical is water-based,no losses is expected when injecting at the
headers with no carryover of the chemical to the gas offtake line.
•	 Injection Quills :Since the available injection points are at a 12 o’clock position,
installation of injection quills at both points are mandatory to ensure the chemical is
injected into the mid-stream of the flow,thus to avoid corrosion at the injection point.
Proper selection of quill metallurgy is critical to ensure no failure at injection point.
•	 Chemical Storage :To minimize chemical handling onsite,it is recommended the
chemical is delivered in tote tanks (nominal capacity 2040 liters) or ISO tanks
(nominal capacity 7,500 liters).
Picture 3: Complete PPE are
used during fluid sampling,
and recycled plastic bottle
for flushing as well as to
prevent spillage.
Note: Due to no available
sampling point for each
wells at TBDR-A, individual
well is diverted to test
header for fluid sampling at
outlet Multiphase Flowmeter
(MPFM).
0	
  
10	
  
20	
  
30	
  
40	
  
50	
  
60	
  
70	
  
80	
  
90	
  
100	
  
LP	
  &	
  HP	
  header	
   Inlet	
  V2020	
  	
   Outlet	
  V2020	
   Inlet	
  V2030	
   Outlet	
  V2030	
  	
   Outlet	
  V3020	
  	
   Inlet	
  PWTS	
   Outlet	
  PWTS	
  
Percent	
  Increase	
  in	
  Total	
  Iron	
  (%)	
  
Sample	
  Point(s)	
  
Chart 3: Percent Increase In Total Iron Through TBC Process
Total Iron increases by 48% from early stage of process up to 78% at PWTS (furthest downstream of water process)
%	
  Increase	
  In	
  Total	
  
Iron	
  
0	
  
100	
  
200	
  
300	
  
400	
  
500	
  
600	
  
0	
  
1	
  
2	
  
3	
  
4	
  
5	
  
6	
  
7	
  
8	
  
9	
  
10	
  
LP	
  &	
  HP	
  header	
   Inlet	
  V2020	
  	
   Outlet	
  V2020	
   Inlet	
  V2030	
   Outlet	
  V2030	
  	
   Outlet	
  V3020	
  	
   Inlet	
  PWTS	
   Outlet	
  PWTS	
  
Chloride	
  Content/Alkalinity	
  (mg/L)	
  
Total	
  Iron	
  (mg/L)	
  
Sample	
  Point(s)	
  
Chart 2: Water Analysis for TBC Process System
Total Iron increases (accumulated) while Chloride Content & Alkalinity are consistent further downstream of TBC process
Total	
  Iron	
  Count	
  (mg/L)	
  
Chloride	
  Content	
  (mg/L)	
  
Alkalinity	
  (mg/L)	
  
4. Chemical Test
The test findings are as follows:
•	 Chart 4 shows the effectiveness of the engineered NFA fluid to neutralize the acidic
liquid to within the“safe zone”of pH 6 to 8.There is no changes in water appearance
after being dosed with the engineered NFA.The performance of the NFA is also
further tested with adding the acid inhibitor in the acidic liquid prior to titration,to
ensure that there is no negative impact.The essential pH is about 6,but to ensure
better protection and maintain the safe pH ranges it is recommended to obtain and
control it between 7 to 8.
•	 Corrosion weight loss calculation based on soak test showed that the NFA is able to
provide additional corrosion protection of 25% reduction in corrosion (compared to
untreated acid liquid).This represents a secondary protection of the piping by the
formulated buffer.The different protection level is plotted above for different dosage
of acid inhibitor treatment (see Chart 5).
0	
  
1	
  
2	
  
3	
  
4	
  
5	
  
6	
  
7	
  
8	
  
9	
  
10	
  
Blend	
  1	
   Blend	
  2	
   Blend	
  3	
   Blend	
  4	
   Blend	
  5	
  
Engineered	
  NFA	
  Volume	
  per	
  160	
  mL	
  sample	
  (mL)	
  /	
  pH	
  
Engineered	
  NFA	
  with	
  varia@on	
  in	
  Acid	
  Inhibitor	
  content	
  
Chart 4: Acid Base Titration Analysis
Engineered NFA neutralizes acidic fluids to safe pH range (6 - 8) while providing additional 25% corrosion protection
Titrant	
  Volume	
  (mL)	
  
Final	
  pH	
  
0	
  
5	
  
10	
  
15	
  
20	
  
25	
  
30	
  
X1	
   X4	
  
%	
  Corrosion	
  Protec-on	
  
Engineered	
  NFA	
  %	
  Ac-ve	
  (ppm)	
  
Chart 5: Corrosion Coupon Soak Test
Engineered NFA provides Additional Corrosion Protection at 25% Inhibition
X1	
   X4	
  
1 2 3 4 5 6
Picture 4: Image of corrosion coupons after 12 days exposure time. Coupon number 5 (minimal
discoloration & most visible coupon number) had the lowest corrosion with a percent protection in
corrosion of 23%.
X1 - 10 ppm (4 hours soak)
X2 - 20 ppm (4 hours soak)
X3 - 40 ppm (4 hours soak)
Blank X1 X2 X3 X4 X5
X4 - 10 ppm (4 hours soak) & 10 ppm (12 days immerse)
X5 - 10 ppm (4 hours soak) & 20 ppm (12 days immerse)
Most corrosive zone
4.TBC Acidic Water Study
The following are key findings from the field work conducted:
Tangga Barat Produced Water Properties
Average Produced Water 119 kL/d
Average pH of Water 4.1
Lowest pH of Water,partial pressure 3.6, 2134 kPa
•	 Presently,production at TBCP-A are from Tangga Barat Drilling/Riser Platform (TBDR),
where 13 wells are online (out of 18 wells).The wells are segregated into HP and
LP wells where well A-7 is the only HP well with a very significant water cut of 62%.
Compared to the previous visit,current produced water has increased by 82% (A-7
not flowing).The two satellites for Tangga Barat Field,Melor and Laho,are offline.
•	 The lowest pH is from well A-9L (3.6) while the highest pH is from well A-4S (7.6).
The flowing wells pH and dissolved CO2
profile are categorized into two categories;
low and high level of corrosive wells respectively.Low corrosive wells (pH within
the safe zone of 6-8 and very low dissolved CO2
) is only A-4S while the other 12
remaining (pH below the safe zone of 6-8 and very high dissolved CO2
) flowing
wells are considered to be acidic and corrosive as shown in Chart 1.Therefore TBC
environment is concluded to be 95% acidic because only well A-4S appeared to be
in the safe zone and have the lowest dissolved CO2
.
•	 For the acidic liquid profiling at process system,samples are taken from seven
different sample points,namely V-2020 condensate inlet & outlet (production
separator),V-2030 water inlet & outlet (condensate degasser),V-3020A water outlet
(media coalescer),S-4230B water inlet (particle filter) and V-4250B water outlet
(deoiler vessel).The pH of the process system liquid samples are 100% acidic.As
shown in chart 1,the pH of the samples are observed to be consistent within the
range of 3.9 - 4.3 (acidic environment).
•	 From flowing wells to process system,there is quite a significant increase of 46% on
average in dissolved CO2
.This would be due to the significant drop of temperature
(50%) from the wells to the process system.Based on studies of solubility of CO2
,
it tends to be more soluble in water at lower temperature.However,there is only a
small percentage drop by 11% of pH from flowing wells to process system due to the
variation of pH (3.6 to 7.6) from the flowing wells.
•	 Other water analysis (total Iron,Chloride content and Alkalinity) are also conducted
during the visit. Chart 2 shows the trending where Chloride content and Alkalinity
are very consistent.However,there is a significant increase in total Iron accumulated
further downstream of the process system.The baseline (average) of total Iron
reading for the flowing wells is 0.3 mg/L. As the liquid flows to the process system,
total Iron increased significantly by 48% from early stage of process up to 78% at
PWTS (leaked and corroded facility).
•	 There are no individual sampling point for each wells at TBDR-A.During sampling,
only one well diverted into MPFM with 1-4 hours stabilization/flushing period.
Corrosion coupon access point is also not in-place currently.
•	 Onboard TBCP-A there is no available chemical injection facility yet for engineered
NFA.
2. Scope of Work
The scope of work (SOW) for this field work are as follows:
STAGE 1:Program Start-up
•	 To compile current produced water data,operating parameters & well test data.
STAGE 2 :Acidic Water Total System Survey & Analysis (Water & Gas Properties)
•	 To determine readiness for chemical solution deployment (availability of chemical
injection point(s),sampling point(s),injection facility,chemical storage layout);
•	 To perform various water analysis based on pH,dissolved CO2
,Total Iron,Chloride
Content & Alkalinity for all flowing wells at TBDR-A and throughout the process
system at TBCP-A; and
•	 To perform gas analysis based on CO2
& H2
S content for all flowing wells at TBDR-A.
STAGE 3 :Chemical Test (Performance & Consumption)
•	 To re-conduct acid titration test with various engineered Neutralizing Filming Additive
(NFA) to deduce the best blend and dosage requirement; and
•	 To re-quantify corrosion protection provided by the formulated NFA through corrosion
coupon soak/exposure test.
1. Background & Objectives
Due to the high CO2
levels in the gas produced at Tangga Barat,the discharged liquid has
a very low pH (safe operating pH ranges from 6 to 8) caused by the high concentration of
carbonic acid in the liquid.The impact of the corrosive acidic environment in the process
system is the incident of numerous leaks at various parts of the liquid handling system.The
biggest challenge of handling the acidic liquid is at the Produce Water Treatment System
(PWTS) within the Tangga Barat Central Processing Platform (TBCP-A).
Although the leaked pipings for PWTS have been fully replaced,for the longer term
solution Petronas Carigali has requested for Clariant to investigate and develop system
specific chemical solution to rectify and mitigate the corrosion problem.The first field work
is completed on July 2014.To focus more on the low pH stream from TBC flowing wells,
the second field work are executed on January 20 and completed on January 28,2015
with two CLARIANT technical personnel accompanied with one PCSB representative from
Production Chemistry department coming onboard.
Picture 1: Outer visual of severely corroded
carbon steel piping at PWTS for TBCP-A. Leakings
occured at most of the wellments.
Picture 2: Inner visual of corroded carbon steel
piping at PWTS for TBCP-A. Corrosion attack
usually happens at the weakest part.
References (Rohrback Cosasco Systems Corrosion Rate Application Note) :
Calculations of Corrosion Rate:The corrosion rate is calculated for each coupon using the diffrence in value of the
initial and final weight,control weight loss,coupon surface area (5.25 in2
),density of the alloy (7.86 g/cm3
),and
exposure time (12 days) in the formula
C.R(mpy)= 22300*[Weight Loss]
A*t*d
Where:
A = surface area of coupon,in2
t = exposure time,days
d = density of the alloy,g/cm3

More Related Content

What's hot

Catalyst unloading details
Catalyst unloading detailsCatalyst unloading details
Catalyst unloading details
Dharmaraj Daddikar
 
swas equipment
 swas equipment swas equipment
Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...
Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...
Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...
Ives Equipment
 
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17
PerkinElmer, Inc.
 
Nitrogen purging
Nitrogen  purgingNitrogen  purging
Nitrogen purging
Dermawan Tarigan
 
Power plant chemistry ion exchange process
Power plant chemistry ion exchange processPower plant chemistry ion exchange process
Power plant chemistry ion exchange process
umar farooq
 
Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems
Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems
Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems
Black & Veatch
 
Efecto de hierro antiescalas
Efecto de hierro antiescalasEfecto de hierro antiescalas
Efecto de hierro antiescalas
Leonardo Fabián Arboleda Mosquera
 
Determination of Inert Gas in Anhydrous Ammonia
Determination of Inert Gas in  Anhydrous AmmoniaDetermination of Inert Gas in  Anhydrous Ammonia
Determination of Inert Gas in Anhydrous Ammonia
Gerard B. Hawkins
 
Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]
Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]
Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]Vishal Modi
 
BENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto Titrator
BENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto TitratorBENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto Titrator
BENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto Titrator
Gerard B. Hawkins
 
New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...
New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...
New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...
ArnaudDelobel1
 
Comparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining Systems
Comparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining SystemsComparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining Systems
Comparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining Systems
Charter_Coating
 

What's hot (15)

Catalyst unloading details
Catalyst unloading detailsCatalyst unloading details
Catalyst unloading details
 
swas equipment
 swas equipment swas equipment
swas equipment
 
Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...
Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...
Claus Sulfur Recovery Tail Gas Applying 100 Million Hours of Operational Time...
 
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using U.S. EPA Method TO-17
 
Nitrogen purging
Nitrogen  purgingNitrogen  purging
Nitrogen purging
 
APR of sorbitol viva
APR of sorbitol vivaAPR of sorbitol viva
APR of sorbitol viva
 
Power plant chemistry ion exchange process
Power plant chemistry ion exchange processPower plant chemistry ion exchange process
Power plant chemistry ion exchange process
 
Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems
Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems
Insight H20- From Plant to Tap- Optimizing Drinking Water Distribution Systems
 
Efecto de hierro antiescalas
Efecto de hierro antiescalasEfecto de hierro antiescalas
Efecto de hierro antiescalas
 
Determination of Inert Gas in Anhydrous Ammonia
Determination of Inert Gas in  Anhydrous AmmoniaDetermination of Inert Gas in  Anhydrous Ammonia
Determination of Inert Gas in Anhydrous Ammonia
 
Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]
Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]
Edta cleaning procedurefor_150mw[1]
 
BENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto Titrator
BENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto TitratorBENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto Titrator
BENFIELD LIQUOR:Determination of Diethanolamine Using an Auto Titrator
 
New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...
New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...
New 2D-LC/MS approaches for the analysis of therapeutic proteins in a regulat...
 
APR of Sorbitol
APR of SorbitolAPR of Sorbitol
APR of Sorbitol
 
Comparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining Systems
Comparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining SystemsComparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining Systems
Comparative Testing of 31 Tank Lining Systems
 

Similar to TBC Acid Water Field Test Report_Mar23-15 R2[1]

CO2 EOR Pilot Project
CO2 EOR Pilot ProjectCO2 EOR Pilot Project
CO2 EOR Pilot ProjectAhmed Nour
 
Measurement of silica
Measurement of silica Measurement of silica
Measurement of silica
kumarswamy927
 
High pressure vessel leakage in urea plants
High pressure vessel leakage in urea plantsHigh pressure vessel leakage in urea plants
High pressure vessel leakage in urea plants
Prem Baboo
 
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
PerkinElmer, Inc.
 
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
PerkinElmer, Inc.
 
Hplc column
Hplc columnHplc column
Hplc column
Selim Reja
 
Cycle chemistry study report presentation.pptx
Cycle chemistry study report  presentation.pptxCycle chemistry study report  presentation.pptx
Cycle chemistry study report presentation.pptx
SudhangsuDas1
 
Analysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OES
Analysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OESAnalysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OES
Analysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OES
PerkinElmer, Inc.
 
Q46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdf
Q46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdfQ46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdf
Q46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdf
ENVIMART
 
I021203057060
I021203057060I021203057060
I021203057060
theijes
 
006a.docx
006a.docx006a.docx
006a.docx
usto
 
IRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb Reactor
IRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb ReactorIRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb Reactor
IRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb Reactor
IRJET Journal
 
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdfOPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
PremBaboo4
 
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdfOPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
PremBaboo4
 
Question Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdf
Question Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdfQuestion Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdf
Question Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdf
PremBaboo4
 
PPT - Electronics Industry Wastewater
PPT - Electronics Industry WastewaterPPT - Electronics Industry Wastewater
PPT - Electronics Industry Wastewater
Nitin Yadav
 
Ureaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernals
UreaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernalsUreaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernals
Ureaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernals
Prem Baboo
 
Low Temperature FAC
Low Temperature FACLow Temperature FAC
Low Temperature FAC
CSI Technologies
 

Similar to TBC Acid Water Field Test Report_Mar23-15 R2[1] (20)

Project Work
Project WorkProject Work
Project Work
 
CO2 EOR Pilot Project
CO2 EOR Pilot ProjectCO2 EOR Pilot Project
CO2 EOR Pilot Project
 
Measurement of silica
Measurement of silica Measurement of silica
Measurement of silica
 
High pressure vessel leakage in urea plants
High pressure vessel leakage in urea plantsHigh pressure vessel leakage in urea plants
High pressure vessel leakage in urea plants
 
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
 
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Using US EPA Method TO-17
 
Hplc column
Hplc columnHplc column
Hplc column
 
Cycle chemistry study report presentation.pptx
Cycle chemistry study report  presentation.pptxCycle chemistry study report  presentation.pptx
Cycle chemistry study report presentation.pptx
 
Analysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OES
Analysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OESAnalysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OES
Analysis of In-Service Oils Following ASTM D5185 with the Avio 200 ICP-OES
 
Full report (Petronas Prai)
Full report (Petronas Prai)Full report (Petronas Prai)
Full report (Petronas Prai)
 
Q46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdf
Q46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdfQ46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdf
Q46H79S-Total-Chlorine-1.pdf
 
I021203057060
I021203057060I021203057060
I021203057060
 
006a.docx
006a.docx006a.docx
006a.docx
 
IRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb Reactor
IRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb ReactorIRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb Reactor
IRJET- A Study on the Impact of Sulfate Free on Huasb Reactor
 
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdfOPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
 
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdfOPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
OPERATION AND TROUBLE SHOOTING IN UREA SYNTHESI SSECTION.pdf
 
Question Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdf
Question Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdfQuestion Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdf
Question Answer on Fertilizers Industries.pdf
 
PPT - Electronics Industry Wastewater
PPT - Electronics Industry WastewaterPPT - Electronics Industry Wastewater
PPT - Electronics Industry Wastewater
 
Ureaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernals
UreaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernalsUreaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernals
Ureaplantenergysavingbyselectionoflinermaterialandinernals
 
Low Temperature FAC
Low Temperature FACLow Temperature FAC
Low Temperature FAC
 

TBC Acid Water Field Test Report_Mar23-15 R2[1]

  • 1. CLIENTPREPARED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY APPROVAL DATE SMA HBN FEBRUARY 10-2015 CLIENT CONTRACT NO. WORK ORDER NO. COSM REFERENCE NO. PCSB - Tangga Barat NA NA NA DOCUMENTRELEASEDATE REVISION NO. DISTRIBUTION LIST : OIM/PS - TBC - PCSB Operations Engr. - PCSB APC Manager - PCSB Tech. Manager - COSM REFERENCES : 1. Hach Digital Titrator 16900 Manual 2. Rohrback Cosasco Systems Corrosion Note 3. Draeger Gas Pump Manual 4. J Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Volume 20, No 6 COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This document contains information proprietary to CLARIANT. Reproduction, disclosure or use of this document in whole or in part is prohibited without express written consent of CLARIANT Technical Director. This document is also an unpublished work of CLARIANT. CLARIANT owns allrights to this work and intends to maintain this work confidential. CLARIANT may also seek to protect this work as an unpublished copyright in order to maintain the work as confidential information and as a trade secret. In the event of either inadvertent or deliberate publication, CLARIANT intends to enforce its rights to this work under the copyright laws as a published work. Internal use of this document is restricted to person(s) or department(s) in the distribution list. FEBRUARY 10-2015 2 ARY PCSB - PMO TANGGA BARAT ACIDIC WATER RECONFIRMATION & REASSESSMENT PROGRAM TECHNICAL REPORT 5. Engineered NFA Injection Program • Injection Method :chemical is injected continuously at 0.4 to 0.7% based on total produced fluids volume.Estimated usage is 300 to 540 L/day (based on 119 kL/d).If 2 injection points are set-up,then this volume will be split between the two injection locations.Note that dosage is calculated based on lab data.Based on previous work, actual field dosage is a multiplier of 2 to 2.5.This will need to be confirmed during actual injection in the plant. • Injection Pumps :the chemical in itself is high pH (11),hence is corrosive.The injection pump specification (all wet contact surfaces and seals) must be able to withstand high pH exposure.RECOMMEND SPECIFIC PUMP HERE. • Injection Points :upstream HP Production Header (line number 350-PG- 04064- 63420X) and LP Production Header (line number 450-PG-04065-63420X) at TBDR. Since the chemical is water-based,no losses is expected when injecting at the headers with no carryover of the chemical to the gas offtake line. • Injection Quills :Since the available injection points are at a 12 o’clock position, installation of injection quills at both points are mandatory to ensure the chemical is injected into the mid-stream of the flow,thus to avoid corrosion at the injection point. Proper selection of quill metallurgy is critical to ensure no failure at injection point. • Chemical Storage :To minimize chemical handling onsite,it is recommended the chemical is delivered in tote tanks (nominal capacity 2040 liters) or ISO tanks (nominal capacity 7,500 liters). Picture 3: Complete PPE are used during fluid sampling, and recycled plastic bottle for flushing as well as to prevent spillage. Note: Due to no available sampling point for each wells at TBDR-A, individual well is diverted to test header for fluid sampling at outlet Multiphase Flowmeter (MPFM). 0   10   20   30   40   50   60   70   80   90   100   LP  &  HP  header   Inlet  V2020     Outlet  V2020   Inlet  V2030   Outlet  V2030     Outlet  V3020     Inlet  PWTS   Outlet  PWTS   Percent  Increase  in  Total  Iron  (%)   Sample  Point(s)   Chart 3: Percent Increase In Total Iron Through TBC Process Total Iron increases by 48% from early stage of process up to 78% at PWTS (furthest downstream of water process) %  Increase  In  Total   Iron   0   100   200   300   400   500   600   0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   LP  &  HP  header   Inlet  V2020     Outlet  V2020   Inlet  V2030   Outlet  V2030     Outlet  V3020     Inlet  PWTS   Outlet  PWTS   Chloride  Content/Alkalinity  (mg/L)   Total  Iron  (mg/L)   Sample  Point(s)   Chart 2: Water Analysis for TBC Process System Total Iron increases (accumulated) while Chloride Content & Alkalinity are consistent further downstream of TBC process Total  Iron  Count  (mg/L)   Chloride  Content  (mg/L)   Alkalinity  (mg/L)   4. Chemical Test The test findings are as follows: • Chart 4 shows the effectiveness of the engineered NFA fluid to neutralize the acidic liquid to within the“safe zone”of pH 6 to 8.There is no changes in water appearance after being dosed with the engineered NFA.The performance of the NFA is also further tested with adding the acid inhibitor in the acidic liquid prior to titration,to ensure that there is no negative impact.The essential pH is about 6,but to ensure better protection and maintain the safe pH ranges it is recommended to obtain and control it between 7 to 8. • Corrosion weight loss calculation based on soak test showed that the NFA is able to provide additional corrosion protection of 25% reduction in corrosion (compared to untreated acid liquid).This represents a secondary protection of the piping by the formulated buffer.The different protection level is plotted above for different dosage of acid inhibitor treatment (see Chart 5). 0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   Blend  1   Blend  2   Blend  3   Blend  4   Blend  5   Engineered  NFA  Volume  per  160  mL  sample  (mL)  /  pH   Engineered  NFA  with  varia@on  in  Acid  Inhibitor  content   Chart 4: Acid Base Titration Analysis Engineered NFA neutralizes acidic fluids to safe pH range (6 - 8) while providing additional 25% corrosion protection Titrant  Volume  (mL)   Final  pH   0   5   10   15   20   25   30   X1   X4   %  Corrosion  Protec-on   Engineered  NFA  %  Ac-ve  (ppm)   Chart 5: Corrosion Coupon Soak Test Engineered NFA provides Additional Corrosion Protection at 25% Inhibition X1   X4   1 2 3 4 5 6 Picture 4: Image of corrosion coupons after 12 days exposure time. Coupon number 5 (minimal discoloration & most visible coupon number) had the lowest corrosion with a percent protection in corrosion of 23%. X1 - 10 ppm (4 hours soak) X2 - 20 ppm (4 hours soak) X3 - 40 ppm (4 hours soak) Blank X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X4 - 10 ppm (4 hours soak) & 10 ppm (12 days immerse) X5 - 10 ppm (4 hours soak) & 20 ppm (12 days immerse) Most corrosive zone 4.TBC Acidic Water Study The following are key findings from the field work conducted: Tangga Barat Produced Water Properties Average Produced Water 119 kL/d Average pH of Water 4.1 Lowest pH of Water,partial pressure 3.6, 2134 kPa • Presently,production at TBCP-A are from Tangga Barat Drilling/Riser Platform (TBDR), where 13 wells are online (out of 18 wells).The wells are segregated into HP and LP wells where well A-7 is the only HP well with a very significant water cut of 62%. Compared to the previous visit,current produced water has increased by 82% (A-7 not flowing).The two satellites for Tangga Barat Field,Melor and Laho,are offline. • The lowest pH is from well A-9L (3.6) while the highest pH is from well A-4S (7.6). The flowing wells pH and dissolved CO2 profile are categorized into two categories; low and high level of corrosive wells respectively.Low corrosive wells (pH within the safe zone of 6-8 and very low dissolved CO2 ) is only A-4S while the other 12 remaining (pH below the safe zone of 6-8 and very high dissolved CO2 ) flowing wells are considered to be acidic and corrosive as shown in Chart 1.Therefore TBC environment is concluded to be 95% acidic because only well A-4S appeared to be in the safe zone and have the lowest dissolved CO2 . • For the acidic liquid profiling at process system,samples are taken from seven different sample points,namely V-2020 condensate inlet & outlet (production separator),V-2030 water inlet & outlet (condensate degasser),V-3020A water outlet (media coalescer),S-4230B water inlet (particle filter) and V-4250B water outlet (deoiler vessel).The pH of the process system liquid samples are 100% acidic.As shown in chart 1,the pH of the samples are observed to be consistent within the range of 3.9 - 4.3 (acidic environment). • From flowing wells to process system,there is quite a significant increase of 46% on average in dissolved CO2 .This would be due to the significant drop of temperature (50%) from the wells to the process system.Based on studies of solubility of CO2 , it tends to be more soluble in water at lower temperature.However,there is only a small percentage drop by 11% of pH from flowing wells to process system due to the variation of pH (3.6 to 7.6) from the flowing wells. • Other water analysis (total Iron,Chloride content and Alkalinity) are also conducted during the visit. Chart 2 shows the trending where Chloride content and Alkalinity are very consistent.However,there is a significant increase in total Iron accumulated further downstream of the process system.The baseline (average) of total Iron reading for the flowing wells is 0.3 mg/L. As the liquid flows to the process system, total Iron increased significantly by 48% from early stage of process up to 78% at PWTS (leaked and corroded facility). • There are no individual sampling point for each wells at TBDR-A.During sampling, only one well diverted into MPFM with 1-4 hours stabilization/flushing period. Corrosion coupon access point is also not in-place currently. • Onboard TBCP-A there is no available chemical injection facility yet for engineered NFA. 2. Scope of Work The scope of work (SOW) for this field work are as follows: STAGE 1:Program Start-up • To compile current produced water data,operating parameters & well test data. STAGE 2 :Acidic Water Total System Survey & Analysis (Water & Gas Properties) • To determine readiness for chemical solution deployment (availability of chemical injection point(s),sampling point(s),injection facility,chemical storage layout); • To perform various water analysis based on pH,dissolved CO2 ,Total Iron,Chloride Content & Alkalinity for all flowing wells at TBDR-A and throughout the process system at TBCP-A; and • To perform gas analysis based on CO2 & H2 S content for all flowing wells at TBDR-A. STAGE 3 :Chemical Test (Performance & Consumption) • To re-conduct acid titration test with various engineered Neutralizing Filming Additive (NFA) to deduce the best blend and dosage requirement; and • To re-quantify corrosion protection provided by the formulated NFA through corrosion coupon soak/exposure test. 1. Background & Objectives Due to the high CO2 levels in the gas produced at Tangga Barat,the discharged liquid has a very low pH (safe operating pH ranges from 6 to 8) caused by the high concentration of carbonic acid in the liquid.The impact of the corrosive acidic environment in the process system is the incident of numerous leaks at various parts of the liquid handling system.The biggest challenge of handling the acidic liquid is at the Produce Water Treatment System (PWTS) within the Tangga Barat Central Processing Platform (TBCP-A). Although the leaked pipings for PWTS have been fully replaced,for the longer term solution Petronas Carigali has requested for Clariant to investigate and develop system specific chemical solution to rectify and mitigate the corrosion problem.The first field work is completed on July 2014.To focus more on the low pH stream from TBC flowing wells, the second field work are executed on January 20 and completed on January 28,2015 with two CLARIANT technical personnel accompanied with one PCSB representative from Production Chemistry department coming onboard. Picture 1: Outer visual of severely corroded carbon steel piping at PWTS for TBCP-A. Leakings occured at most of the wellments. Picture 2: Inner visual of corroded carbon steel piping at PWTS for TBCP-A. Corrosion attack usually happens at the weakest part. References (Rohrback Cosasco Systems Corrosion Rate Application Note) : Calculations of Corrosion Rate:The corrosion rate is calculated for each coupon using the diffrence in value of the initial and final weight,control weight loss,coupon surface area (5.25 in2 ),density of the alloy (7.86 g/cm3 ),and exposure time (12 days) in the formula C.R(mpy)= 22300*[Weight Loss] A*t*d Where: A = surface area of coupon,in2 t = exposure time,days d = density of the alloy,g/cm3