This document presents photographic evidence suggesting that the Taj Mahal and other structures in India were originally built as Hindu temples and palaces, not Muslim buildings. It includes 17 photographs of areas within and around the Taj Mahal with descriptions arguing for its Hindu origins. For example, photos show a trident-shaped pinnacle, octagonal features, and carvings that are identified as having Hindu religious significance rather than Muslim. The document argues that India's history has been distorted and its true cultural achievements suppressed.

1. Was the Taj Mahal a Vedic Temple?
The Photographic Evidence
This presents photographs (listed below) that show the Vedic influence found in such
buildings as the Taj Mahal, Red Fort, and other structures in India. It also presents photos
of drawings and art that have been discovered from other parts of the world, such as
Arabia, Egypt, Greece and Italy, that show a definite Vedic influence. No matter whether
you accept all of this or not, it nonetheless makes for an extremely fascinating and
interesting story. Take a look and decide for yourself what you think. Also, let other
people know about these, or print and use them for your own displays in your temple,
office or home. Or exhibit the slide show for others to see.
We have all heard how the Taj Mahal, which is considered one of the great wonders of
the world, was built as the preeminent expression of a man’s love for a wife. That it was
built by emperor Shah Jahan in commemoration of his wife Mumtaz. However, in our
continuous effort to get to the truth, we have recently acquired some very important
documents and information. There is evidence that the Taj Mahal was never built by Shah
Jahan. Some say the Taj Mahal pre-dates Shah Jahan by several centuries and was
originally built as a Hindu or Vedic temple/palace complex. Shah Jahan merely acquired it
from its previous owner, the Hindu King Jai Singh. In fact, as recently as 1910, the
Encyclopedia Brittanica also said that it was a pre-existing building before Shah Jahan.
This controversy is something I have explained more thoroughly in my book, “Proof of
Vedic Culture’s Global Existence.” However, other articles can be found on this CD that
also explain some very interesting details. So, for those who want to know the intricacies
of this issue, you can find it there. Yet here is the photographic evidence that will provide
greater insights into this. The point to consider is how much more of India’s history has
been distorted if the background of such a grand building is so inaccurate.
These photographs are taken from an album that was found and then smuggled out of
India. On the back of each photo there is a stamp mark that says, “Archaeology Survey of
India.” This signifies their authenticity and that they were the property of that institution.
This means a number of things: That the Archaeology Survey of India (ASI) has been
researching the evidence that proves the Taj Mahal and many other buildings were not of
Muslim origin, and that they know this information but remain silent about it. It also shows
that in spite of this evidence they refuse to open up further research that would reveal the
true nature and originality of the buildings, and lead to understanding another part of the
real history and glory of India. This attitude is something that must be changed.

2. It is because of the manipulation of history by invaders that the true greatness of India
and Vedic culture has been stifled or hidden. And it is time that people everywhere realize
how numerous lies and false propaganda have been passed around as if it were the truth
in regard to India and its past, as well as its art, archeology, and the wonder of its culture.
India and its Vedic society was one of the preeminent civilizations of the world, as I
explained in “Proof of Vedic Culture’s Global Existence.” Now, through the increasing
amount of revealing evidence that is being uncovered, that greatness of India’s past and
its contributions to the world are gradually being recognized. It is because of this that it is
now time to rewrite the history of India.
These photos are black and white and were found in a simple photo album in India.
Except for old age and some water damage on some of them (creating white spots in
areas), most are still in relatively good condition. Each photograph was accompanied by a
typed caption taped in the album near the photo, each of which gives a very interesting
explanation of the subject and the Vedic influence recognized on the building and what it
means. The captions are written on the following pages (listed next to the photo number)
just as they were written in the album, so the style of English and the explanations are
kept the same. They are obviously written from an Indian perspective. Whatever I may
say about the photos are displayed in brackets [ ]. Otherwise I let the captions and photos
speak for themselves. Some of these photos will show areas of the Taj where the public
has no access, or what is rarely seen or noticed.
Descriptions of the Photographs
of the Taj Mahal

3. Photo # 1: An aerial view of the Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya, ancient Hindu temple
complex in Agra. For the last 300 years the world has been fooled to believe that this
stupendous edifice was built by the 5th
generation Mogul emperor Shahjahan to
commemorate one of his dead wives–Mumtaz. The two flanking buildings although
identical, only the one in the rear is known as a mosque. The Taj Mahal has seven
stories. Five of them lie sealed and barred concealing rich evidence. The marble building
in the centre is flanked by two symmetrical ones. The one in the foreground is the eastern
one. The one in the background is being represented as a mosque because it is to the
west. They should not have been identical if only one was to be a mosque. In the
courtyard at the foot of the eastern building is inlaid a full scale replica of the trident
pinnacle [found at the top of the dome]. The tiny tower at the left near the western
building, encloses a huge octagonal multi-storied well.

4. Photo # 2: This is the massive octagonal well with palatial apartments along its seven
stories. A royal staircase descends right down to the water level indicated by the tiny
white patch showing the sun’s reflection. This was the traditional treasury well of the
Hindu temple palace. Treasure chests used to be stacked in the lower stories.
Accountants, cashiers and treasurers sat in the upper stories. Cheques called handies
used to be issued from here. On being besieged, if the building had to be surrendered to
the enemy, the treasure used to be pushed into the water for salvage later after
recapture. For real research, water should be pumped out of this well to reveal the
evidence that lies at the bottom. This well is inside a tower near the so-called mosque to
the west of the marble Taj. Had the Taj been a mausoleum this octagonal multistoried
well would have been superfluous.

5. Photo # 3: A frontal view of the Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya in Agra. It is octagonal
because the Hindus believe in 10 directions. The pinnacle pointing to the heaven and the
foundation to the nether world, plus the eight surface directions make the 10 directions.
Divinity and royalty are believed to hold sway in all those 10 directions. Hence in Hindu
tradition, buildings connected with royalty and divinity must have some octagonal features
or the buildings themselves should be octagonal. The two flanking cupolas (two others to
the rear are not seen in this photo) are also identical. The towers at the four plinth corners
served as watch towers during the day, and to hold lights at night. Hindu wedding altars
and Satyanarayan worship altars invariably have such towers at corners. [Many other
Hindu temples, such as those at Khajurao, also can be found to have four towers or
temples, one at each corner of the temple foundation.] The lotus flower cap on the head
of the dome is a Hindu feature. Muslim domes are bald. This marble edifice has four
stories. Inside the dome is an 83 ft. high hall. The Taj has a double dome. The dome one
sees from inside ends like an inverted pan on the terrace. The dome seen from outside is
a cover on the inner dome. Therefore, in between them is an 83 ft. hall. This may be
considered as one storey. Underneath may be seen the first storey arches and the ground
floor rooms. In the basement, visitors are shown one room. All these constitute the four
storeys in the marble edifice. Below the marble structure are two stories in red stone
reaching down to the river level. The 7th
storey must be below the river level because
every ancient Hindu historic building did have a basement. Thus, the Taj is a seven-
storied structure.

6. Photo # 4: The dome of the Taj Mahal bearing a trident pinnacle made of a non-rusting
eight-metal Hindu alloy. The pinnacle served as a lightning deflector too. This pinnacle

7. has been blindly assumed by many to be an Islamic crescent and star, or a lightning
conductor installed by the British. This is a measure of the careless manner in which
Indian history has been studied till now. Visually identifiable things like this pinnacle too
have been misinterpreted with impunity. The flower top of the dome, below the pinnacle,
is an unmistakable Hindu sign. A full scale figure of this pinnacle is inlaid in the eastern
courtyard.

8. Photo # 5: A close up of the upper portion of the pinnacle of the Taj Mahal, photographed
from the parapet beneath the dome. The Hindu horizontal crescent and the coconut top
together look like a trident from the garden level. Islamic crescents are always oblique.
Moreover they are almost always complete circles leaving a little opening for a star. This

9. Hindu pinnacle had all these centuries been misinterpreted as an Islamic crescent and
star or a lightning conductor installed by the British. The word “Allah” etched here by
Shahjahan is absent in the courtyard replica. The coconut, the bent mango leaves under it
and the supporting Kalash (water pot) are exclusive Hindu motifs.

10. Photo # 6: The full scale figure of the pinnacle on the dome has been inlaid on the red
stone courtyard of the Taj Mahal. One may see it to the east at the foot of the riverside
arch of the flanking building wrongly dubbed as Jamiat Khana (community hall) by Muslim

11. usurpers. Such floor sketches in courtyards are a common Hindu trait. In Fatehpur Sikri it
is the backgammon board which is sketched on a central courtyard. The coconut top and
the bent mango leaves underneath, resting on a kalash (i.e. a water pot) is a sacred
Hindu motif. Hindu shrines in the Himalayan foothills have identical pinnacles [especially
noticed at Kedarnath, a prominent Shiva temple]. The eastern location of the sketch is
also typically Hindu. The length measures almost 32 ft.
Photo # 7: The apex of the lofty entrance arch on all four sides of the Taj Mahal bears
this red lotus and white trident–indicating that the building originated as a Hindu temple.
The Koranic lettering forming the middle strip was grafted after Shahjahan seized the
building from Jaipur state’s Hindu ruler.

12. Photo # 8: This is a riverside view of the Taj Mahal. The four storied marble structure
above has under it these two stories reaching down to the river level. The 22 rooms
shown in other photos are behind that line of arches seen in the middle. Each arch is
flanked by Hindu lotus discs in white marble. Just above the ground level is the plinth. In
the left corner of the plinth is a doorway indicating inside the plinth are many rooms
sealed by Shahjahan. One could step out to the river bank from the door at the left. The
7th
storey is surmised to be under the plinth below the ground because every ancient
Hindu mansion had a basement. Excavation to reach the basement chamber should start
under this door.

13. Photo # 9: Most people content to see Mumtaz’s grave inside the Taj fail to go to the rear
riverside. This is the riverside view. From here one may notice that the four-storied marble
structure on top has below it two more stories in red stone. Note the window aperture in
the arch at the left. That indicates that there are rooms inside. Inside the row of arches in
the upper part of the wall are 22 rooms. In addition to the four stories in marble, this one
shows red stone arches in the 5th
storey. The 6th
storey lies in the plinth in the lower
portion of the photo. In another photo a doorway would be seen in the left corner of the
plinth, indicating the presence of apartments inside, from where one could emerge on the
river for a bath.

14. Photo # 10: These corridors at the approach of the Taj Mahal are typically Hindu. They
may be seen in any ancient Hindu capital. Note the two octagonal tower cupolas at the
right and left top. Only Hindus have special names for the eight directions and celestial
guards assigned to each. Any octagonal feature in historic buildings should convince the
visitor of their Hindu origin. Guards, palanquin bearers and other attendants resided in
hundreds of rooms along numerous such corridors when the Taj Mahal was a Hindu
temple palace. Thus the Taj was more magnificent and majestic before it was reduced to
a sombre Islamic cemetery.

15. Photo # 11: This Naqqar Khana alias Music House in the Taj Mahal garden is an
incongruity if the Taj Mahal were an Islamic tomb. Close by on the right is the building
which Muslims claim to be a mosque. The proximity of a mosque to the Music House is
incongruous with Muslim tradition. In India, Muslims have a tradition of pelting stones on
Hindu music processions passing over a mosque. Moreover a mausoleum needs silence.
A dead person’s repose is never to be disturbed. Who would then provide a band house
for a dead Mumtaz? Contrarily Hindu temples and palaces have a music house because
morning and evening Hindu chores begin to the sweet strains of sacred music.

16. Photo # 12: Such are the rooms on the 1st
floor of the marble structure of the Taj Mahal.
The two staircases leading to this upper floor are kept locked and barred since
Shahjahan’s time. The floor and the marble walls of such upper floor rooms can be seen
in the picture to have been stripped of its marble panels. Shahjahan used that uprooted
marble from the upper floor for constructing graves and engraving the Koran because he
did not know wherefrom to procure marble matching the splendour of the rest of the Taj
Mahal. He was also so stingy as not to want to spend much even on converting a robbed
Hindu temple into an Islamic mausoleum.

17. Photo # 13: Such are the magnificent marble-paved, shining, cool, white bright rooms of
the Taj Mahal temple palace’s marble ground floor. Even the lower third portion of the
walls is covered with magnificent marble mosaic. The doorway at the left looks
suspiciously closed with a stone slab. One can perambulate through these rooms around
the central octagonal sanctorum, now occupied by Mumtaz’s fake grave. The aperture,
seen through of the central door, enabled perambulating devotees to keep their eyes fixed
on the Shiva Linga in the central chamber. Hindu Shiva Lingas are consecrated in two
chambers, one above the other. Therefore, Shahjahan had to raise two graves in the
name of Mumtaz–one in the marble basement and the other on the ground floor to
desecrate and hide both the Shiva emblems from public view. [The famous Shiva temple
in Ujjain also has an underground chamber for one of its Shiva-lingams.]

18. Photo # 14: This is the Dhatura flower essential for Hindu Shiva worship. The flower is
depicted in the shape of the sacred, esoteric Hindu incantation ‘OM.’ Embossed designs
of this blooming ‘OM’ are drawn over the exterior of the octagonal central sanctorum of
Shiva where now a fake grave in Mumtaz’s has been planted. While perambulating
around the central chamber one may see such ‘OM’ designs.

19. Photo # 15: This staircase and another symmetrical one at the other end lead down to
the storey beneath the marble platform. Visitors may go to the back of the marble plinth at
the eastern or western end and descend down the staircase because it is open to the sky.

20. But at the foot the archaeology department has set up an iron door which it keeps locked.
Yet one may peep inside from the iron gate in the upper part of the door. Shahjahan had
sealed even these two staircases. It was the British who opened them. But from
Shahjahan’s time the stories below and above the marble ground floor have been barred
to visitors. We are still following Mogul dictates though long free from Mogul rule.

22. Photo # 16: On the inner flank of the 22 locked rooms (in the secret storey in red stone
below the marble platform) is this corridor about 12 ft. broad and 300 ft. long. Note the
scallop design at the base of the plinth supporting the arches. This is the Hindu
decoration which enables one to identify even a bare plinth.

23. Photo # 17: One of the 22 rooms in the secret storey underneath the marble plinth of the
Taj Mahal. Many such features of the Taj remain unknown to the public so long as they
see it only as a tomb. If the public knew how much it is missing in the Taj Mahal it will
insist that the government unseal its many stories. Two doorways at either end of this
corridor in the right side wall leading to inner apartments have been sealed by Shahjahan.
If those doorways are opened, important evidence concealed inside by Shahjahan may
come to light.
Photo # 18: A corner of one of the 22 rooms in the secret storey immediately below the
marble platform of the Taj Mahal. Note the strips of Hindu paint on the wall. The ventilator
at the left, meant for air and light from the riverside, has been crudely walled up by
Shahjahan. He did not bother even to plaster them. Had Shahjahan built the Taj as a
mausoleum what was the purpose of the 22 rooms? And why are they kept locked and
hidden from the public?

24. Photo # 19: One of the 22 locked rooms in the secret storey beneath the marble platform
of the Taj Mahal. Strips of ancient Hindu paint are seen on the wall flanking the doorway.
The niches above had paintings of Hindu idols, obviously rubbed off by Muslim
desecraters. The rooms may be seen door within door in a row. If the public knew that the

25. Taj Mahal is a structure hiding hundreds of rooms, they would insist on seeing the whole
of it. At present they only peep into the grave chamber and walk away.
Photo # 20: This esoteric Hindu design is painted on the ceiling of some of the 22 locked
rooms in the secret storey below the marble platform of the Taj Mahal in Agra. Had
Shahjahan built the Taj Mahal he would not have kept such elaborately painted rooms
sealed and barred to the public. Even now one can enter these rooms only if one can
influence the archaeology department to remove the locks.

26. Photo # 21: A huge ventilator of one of the 22 rooms in a secret storey of the Taj, is seen
here crudely sealed with unplastered bricks by Shahjahan. History has been so perverted
and inverted that alien Muslims like Shahjahan who spoiled, damaged, desecrated and
destroyed historic Hindu buildings, are being falsely paraded as great builders.

27. Photo # 22: One of the 22 riverside rooms in a secret storey of the Taj Mahal, unknown to
the public. Shahjahan, far from building the shining marble Taj, wantonly disfigured it.

28. Here he has crudely walled up a doorway. Such imperial Mogul vandalism lies hidden
from the public. This room is in the red stone storey immediately below the marble
platform. Indian history has been turned topsy turvy in lauding destroyers as great
builders.

29. Photo # 23: Many such doorways of chambers in secret stories underneath the Taj Mahal
have been sealed with brick and lime. Concealed inside could be valuable evidence such
as Sanskrit inscriptions, Hindu idols, the original Hindu model of the Taj, the desecrated
Shiva Linga, Hindu scriptures and temple equipment. Besides such sealed chambers
there are many which are kept locked by the Government. The Public must raise its voice
to have these opened or it should institute legal proceedings. Shree P. N. Sharma of
Green Park, New Delhi who peeped through an aperture in these chambers in 1934 A.D.
saw a pillared hall with images carved on the pillars.
Photo # 24: Burharpur is a very ancient historic city on the Central Railway between
Khandwa and Bhusawal junctions. Burhanpur and the nearby Asirgarh (fort) used to
provide hospitality to Hindu royals proceeding north or south on pilgrimage, weddings or
military expeditions. Barhanpur has many magnificent mansions which are currently being
described as mosques and tombs of alien Islamic invaders. This building is one such
ancient Hindu royal palace captured by the Moghuls. Mumtaz died here during her
14th
delivery around 1630 A.D. while she and Shahjahan were camping here. She is said
to be buried in a Hindu pavilion in front of this palace.

30. Photo # 25: Mumtaz is supposed to be buried in this garden pavilion of the ancient Hindu
palace (Ahu Mahal) 600 miles from Agra, in Burhanpur. Another version says that
Mumtaz’s corpse was kept here exposed to sun, rain, and wild beasts for six months. The
date of her death, the date of her removal from Burhanpur to Agra, and the date of her
assumed burial in the Taj Mahal are all unknown because the entire Taj Mahal-Mumtaz
legend is a concoction from the beginning to end. [Mumtaz was only one of several
hundred wives and women that Shahjahan kept in his harem.]
Descriptions of the Photographs of the Red Fort
and Other Buildings in Delhi and Elsewhere in India

32. Photo # 26: This tablet raised inside Delhi’s Red Fort by modern archaeologists
proclaims that Shahjahan (who ruled from 1628 to 1658 A.D.) built this fort from 1639 to
1648 A.D. As against this see the [next] photo of the painting of Shahjahan’s time
preserved in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. It depicts Shajahan receiving the Persian
ambassador inside the fort in 1628, the very year of Shahjahan’s accession. Obviously
the fort existed much before Shahjahan.

34. Photo # 27: The 5th
generation Mogul emperor Shahjahan is credited with having built the
Red Fort in Delhi. Shahjahan ascended the throne in 1628 A.D. This contemporary
painting shows him receiving the Persian ambassador in 1628 itself, in the Diwan-i-Aam
(Common Room) of the Red Fort itself. This painting preserved in the Bodleian Library,
Oxford, was reproduced in the Illustrated Weekly of India (page 32) of March 14, 1971.
Since Shahjahan was in the fort in the year of his accession, this documentary evidence
disproves the notion that he built the fort. Compare with this the photo of the tablet in
English raised inside the fort by the Govt. of India’s archaeology department asserting
that Shahjahan built the fort during 1639-48. This is emphatic proof of Indian history
having been thoroughly falsified during Muslim rule in India.
Photo # 28: The Red Fort in Delhi has in its Khas Mahal, alias the King’s apartment, the
royal emblem of its builder King Anangoal. It consists of a pair of swords laid hilt to hilt
curving upwards, the sacred Hindu pot (kalash) above the hilts, a lotus bud and a pair of
scales of justice balanced over it. Dotted around are representations of the sun from
whom Indian ruling dynasties claimed descent. At the sword points are two small conches
considered sacred in Hindu tradition. Bigger conches may be seen at the left and right
corners at the base. This royal Hindu insignia of the Hindu king who built Delhi’s Red Fort,
is still there in the Khas Mahal pavilion. But even this visual symbol has been blatantly

35. misinterpreted. The two swords laid hilt to hilt, curving upward are being inadvertently
styled by ignorant guides, archaeologists and historians as an Islamic crescent. The
sacred Hindu Kalash (water pot) on the hilts is never noticed. The lotus bud on the kalash
represents royal wealth. The pair of scales is symbolic of impartial justice.

37. Photo # 29: This perforated marble screen inside the Khas Mahal (i.e. the King’s own
chamber) in Delhi’s Red Fort, is a Hindu specialty. Such jalees are mentioned even in
Ramayanic descriptions of palaces. Therefore some buildings claimed to be mosques in
Ahmedabad which boast of such exquisite jalees (lattices) are Hindu edifices. The Hindu
royal emblem mounted on the upper part of the jalee, disproves that the Mogul Shahjahan
built the fort.

39. Photos # 30 & 31: The resplendent Hindu midday sun (from whom Hindu rulers claim
descent) in the arch above flanked by the sacred Hindu letter OM. Below it is the royal
Hindu insignia. This proves the hollowness of the claim that Shahjahan commissioned the
Red Fort.
Photo # 32:
Photo # 33: It is entirely false that the Red Fort of Delhi was built by Shahjahan in 1639-
48 A.D. Muslims were the destroyers of statues. Then why should they have constructed
statues? But there are statues of Hindu Mahavants riding the elephants of the doors of
each interior room of “Khas Mahal” in the Red Fort. On the main gate of the Fort named
“Delhi Darwaja,” there are huge statues of elephants. The curtain of building statues of
elephants on forts and palace gates can be well judged by examining the palaces at
Gwalior, Udaipur and Kota. Decorating homes, forts, palaces and temples with elephants
is a hoary Hindu tradition. To the Hindu an elephant symbolizes might, power, glory and
wealth. The Red Fort in Delhi has life-size elephants at its gate and elephants with riders
atop its door knobs in the Khas Mahal pavilion. Had Shahjahan built the fort, such Hindu
motifs should not have been there.

41. Photo # 34: A close up of the elephant and rider door knob in the Khas Mahal of the Red
Fort in Delhi. This is a typically Hindu motif. Other big life-size stone elephants decorating
the Naqqar Khana (Music House) gate were slaughtered by Islamic invaders. The
chopped up pieces may still be seen stored in the Khas Mahal basements. The public
must insist on these being joined and displayed.

43. Photo # 35: Inner view of the entrance to the so-called Moti Masjid inside Delhi’s Red
Fort. The archaeological tablet outside claims that the mosque was built by Aurangzeb,
son and successor of Shahjahan. That claim is baseless because (1) The entrance is of a
temple design. (2) The arch between the domes is made of banana bunches used in
Hindu worship. (3) On either side above the arch are fruit trays. (4) Naming buildings after
gems (Moti means pearl) is a Hindu custom. (5) If Shahjahan built the fort why didn’t he
provide it with a mosque? (6) The truncated Hindu perambulatory passage may still be
seen to exist on the building’s left flank. (7) The back of the wall shows signs of
tampering.
Photo # 36: A close-up of the interior top of the entrance arch of the so-called Moti Masjid
(which was Hindu Moti Mandir) inside Delhi’s Red Fort. The arch at the bottom may be
seen to be made of banana bunches. On either side above the arch are trays holding five
fruits each as holy Hindu offering. Fruit is taboo inside Muslim mosques.

44. Photo # 37: This temple-front design of ribbed gourd-like domes on either side with a
pinnacle surmounted by a canopy in the centre, embossed on the riverside wall of the
Rang Mahal apartment inside Delhi’s Red fort is emphatic proof that the fort is a pre-
Shahjahan Hindu fort. Even the name Rang Mahal is Hindu. In this same pavilion is
carved on the floor an exquisite lotus in full bloom as a fountain trough. Muslim walls and
floors are plain. The canopy in the photo may be seen at several Hindu altars. The kalash
(pot) under it represents divinity in Hindu tradition.

45. Photo # 38: ‘Vishnu’s footprint’ in the so-called Humayun Tomb, New Delhi. This photo is
reproduced from page 78 of “The World of Ancient India,” translated into English (from G.

46. Le Bon’s original French book published in the 19th
century) by David Macrae, Tudor
Publishing co., New York, 1974. This photo proves that the so-called Humayun
mausoleum is an ancient Hindu temple palace. Inquiries with archaeologists in Delhi drew
a blank They have never seen these footprints, which indicates that they are heir to a lot
of non-information and mis-information. Humayun is not at all buried in Delhi. According
to Farishta’s chronicle (English translation by John Briggs, Vol. II, page 174) Humayun is
buried in Agra, while according to Abul Fazal (Elliot & Dowson, Vol. VI, page 22)
Humayun lies buried in Sirhind.
Photo # 39: A panel of the so-called Kutab tower in Delhi. The exquisite serpentine Hindu
pattern in the upper part is the wreath called ‘Makar Torana’ because it emanates from
the mouth of a crocodile. This is a very common sacred Hindu motif in historic buildings.
The Islamic tampering and forgery in stone may be seen in the lower portion. An attempt
has been made to plant Koranic lettering. Such forgery in stone fooled even historians
who thereby inadvertently ascribed those buildings to Muslim authorship.

47. Photo # 40: This remnant of a temple around the so-called Kutab Minar in Delhi has been
named ‘Kuwat-ul-Islam’ mosque by the conqueror Kutubuddin in the closing years of the
12th
century A.D. The term signifies “The Strength of Islam” in capturing and battering a
Hindu temple and blatantly using it as a mosque. Ignorant historians who could not
explain away the Hindu workmanship foolishly concluded that the Muslims demolished
some other temple and carried the Hindu pillars hither to raise this ‘mosque (?).’ This is
an absurdity from every point of view. Muslims only seized Hindu temples and pressed
them into service as mosques.

48. Photo # 41: Muslim captors dismantled surface stones of the so-called Kutab tower in
Delhi, reversed them and inscribed Koran on the exterior. This Muslim forgery in stone
came to light as those stones started falling off the tower. Here we can see the Hindu
images on one side while the next view Photo # 42: reveals the subsequent Islamic
lettering on the other.

49. Photo # 43: Four miles from the so-called Kutab Minar in Delhi is an ancient Hindu
temple palace currently known as Sultan Ghari. An uncrowned son of sultan Iltmash
(around 1230 A.D. ) is believed buried in it. That is a myth because there is no grave
there. A Sanskrit inscription was also found in its ceiling. The beams of the octagonal
crypt bore figures of Kamadhenu (celestial cow) and Varaha ([Lord Vishnu’s incarnation
as a] wild boar). A Muslim tomb would never sport two highly detested animals. These
two animals were a royal Hindu insignia. Even today five such pig-faced drain pipes may
be seen projecting out of the walls of the royal pavilions inside Delhi’s Red Fort. Had
Shahjahan built the fort, as is currently believed, he wouldn’t have had pigs peering from
over his royal Islamic head since pigs are deeply detested by Islam. Contrarily, the wild
boar is an Hindu incarnation and sacred royal Hindu emblem. This is one of the visual
proofs of the Hindu origin of Delhi’s Red Fort. So careless has been the study of Indian
history that such graphic proofs have remained unnoticed. For similar more evidence read
Mr. P. N. Oak’s research book titled “Delhi’s Red Fort is Hindu Lalkot.” [This photo was
repeated elsewhere in the album, under which was a caption that was completely
different. You may want to read it as well, which follows:]
This ancient Hindu royal emblem of a wild boar (left) and the cow was found engraved on
a lintel of what has been euphemistically called Sultan Ghari four miles from the Kutab
Minar in Delhi. This proves that the so-called tomb was originally a Hindu palace. Like
thousands of other buildings throughout India that palace too was pressed into Muslim
use. Sultan Altmash’s son is believed to be buried there. Yet the tomb is not known after
him but merely as the “Sultan’s Cavern.” Scholars have been wrong in believing that the
building was built after the prince’s death. All such mediaeval tombs and mosques are

50. erstwhile Hindu palaces and temples. That is why their decor is entirely Hindu. Historians
and archaeologists, hard put to explain away Hindu decor of what they believed to be
Muslim buildings, improvised the absurd justification that the building must have been
fashioned out of the debris of some Hindu buildings, or that the workmen, being Hindu,
built in the Hindu style. Both these arguments are wrong. No building worth its name can
be built out of debris. Similarly no workman ever dare or would ever care to fashion a
building for which he is hired according to his own taste opposed to that of the owner’s. In
this case, the lintel was plastered over when the building was used as a Muslim tomb
because the Islamic conscience cannot tolerate idolatrous images. Such tactics were
used by Muslim invaders in all lands they overran, when making use of captured
buildings. A Sanskrit inscription was also found in the roof of the building. The building is
octagonal in shape which is also a Hindu specialty. This royal Hindu emblem and another
found in the Red Fort in Delhi stress the need for historians to look for and collect all such
ancient Hindu royal emblems. This is a very enchanting and engrossing task that faces all
those who are interested in rewriting Indian history after a millennium of Islam distortion
and destruction.
Photo # 44: The conical arch seen in Indian forts, palaces and temples though of native
Hindu origin has been mistaken and misrepresented by erring Western scholars as
Saracenic i.e. Muslim. This photo of a Saudi Arabian currency note shows the typical
Muslim arch which is quite different from the conical Hindu arch. Had historic buildings in
India been of Islamic origin they should have had such arches. In the top right corner is a
palm tree and crossed, face-down swords. Even this typically Islamic motif exists nowhere
on historic buildings in India.

51. Photo # 45: A magnified view of the top right corner design on a Saudi Arabian currency
note. Had historic buildings in India been of Islamic origin they should have had this motif
among other carvings.

52. Photo # 46: This is the so-called Atala Devi Mosque at Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh. Atala
Devi is a Hindu goddess of inexorable fate. Therefore, it is obvious that her imposing
Hindu temple is being currently misused as a mosque and is blatantly characterized as a
piece of Islamic architecture. General Cunningham, a British novice who set up the
archaeology department under the British administration, made the initial blunder of
assuming that historic buildings in Muslim possession were built by the Muslims
themselves.

53. Photo # 47: This tripolia i.e. three-arched gateway of Karnawati (Islamized as
Ahmedabad) is falsely being ascribed to Sultan Ahmad of Gujarat. The window above
each archway was meant to shower sacred grain and rose water over entering or
departing Hindu royalty. Over the centuries under Islamic rule, history became a matter of
mere hearsay. Ahmedabad was from its very name presumed by errant historians to have
been founded by Ahmadshah. By the same token, would it be right to assert that Delhi’s
Rashtapati Bhawan was built for the first Rashtrapati?

55. Photo # 48: Ahmedabad’s Hindu names were Karnavati, Rajnagar and Asaval. Invading
Muslims proselytized whole cities by imposing an Islamic name on them. They also
simultaneously converted the main Hindu shrines into Muslim. This is one such currently
called the Jama Masjid but which in fact was the city’s central Bhadrakali temple.
Mosques do not have rows of such ornamental pillars lest Muslim congregations bending
in prayer with eyes closed smash their heads against the pillars and bleed. In Gwalior too
the so-called Mahomed Ghaus mausolem has an identical interior proving that that too is
a usurped temple.
Photo # 49: Elephants on elevated platforms curving their trunks in a welcome arch over
the gate of the city palace, Kota, a principality. Goddess Lakshmi is also flanked by such
welcoming elephants. Fatehpur Sikri too has an identical gate. Had Akbar erected that
township its gate should not have had that Hindu design. Moreover those elephants have
been beheaded, which is additional proof that on capture of that township Muslim
occupants couldn’t bear the sight of those Hindu elephants. Guides usually skip that gate.
Before hiring the guide, visitors must insist that he show them the elephant gate also.

56. Photo # 50: An apartment of city palace, Kota, a Hindu capital. Pictorial patterns on walls
are a Hindu feature. Therefore picturesque walls behind the royal seat in the Red Forts in
Delhi and Agra, are proof of their Hindu origin. Similarly, the palace in Srirangapatnam
with painted designs on its walls usually ascribed to the Muslim Tipu Sultan is of Hindu
origin.

57. Photo # 51: Currently known as Adhai-din-ka-Zopda (the 2-1/2 day cottage) in Ajmer
(alias Ajeya-Meru) this edifice was a magnificent, majestic Hindu temple. Invading
Muslims battering it for 2-1/2 days after capture reduced the mansion to desolation–hence

58. the name. Historians, architects and archaeologists blindly ascribing it to Muslim creation
lustily describe ancient classic Hindu architectural masterpieces as Islamic.
Photo # 52: Twenty-five miles from Baroda (now Vadodara) city is a fort Pavagad. At its
foot is a beautiful township called Champaner. Most of its magnificent Hindu buildings are
being misused and misrepresented as mosques and tombs. Here is one truncated
ornamental Hindu palace pavilion being paraded as a mosque. Being exquisitely carved,
Muslims call it Nagina (ornamented) mosque. The lotus pattern flanking the arches is
typically Hindu. Intricate, ornamented carving is sacrilegious and distracting for Muslims.
The battered top indicates how destroyers have called themselves builders.

59. Photo # 53: These are two lamp posts of an ancient Hindu temple battered by invading
Muslims near Mhasve village in Jalgaon district of Maharashtra. They are only a foot

60. apart. If one person climbs up to the top of each of these pillars and one stretches his leg
thrusting it against the other lamp post, both the pillars rock gently. Ancient Hindus raised
such rocking edifices in many other places such as Gurdaspur and Ahmedabad alias
Karnavati.
Photo # 54: This building at Aurangabad in the Deccan was built by a Hindu Raja who
was impressed by the Tajo-Mahalaya in Agra when he visited it on pilgrimage in pre-
Muslim times. Ironically, Shahjahan planted a grave in the Agra building while his son and
successor Aurangzeb planted his own wife’s (fake) grave in the Aurangabad building.
Other historic buildings in Aurangabad are similarly of Hindu origin though they are
currently ascribed to Muslims by somnolent historians. The Hindu origin of this building,
now wrongly dubbed as Bibi-Ka-Makabara, is discussed in Mr. P. N. Oak’s article in the
Deepavali 1972 number of Marathi Dharmabhaskar monthly.

61. Photo # 55: In Farkanday village in Jalgaon district in Maharashtra is this ancient Hindu
temple currently used as a mosque. If one person climbs to the top of each of the two
towers and hugs the window vigorously, both the towers rock gently as in an earthquake.
This gimmick of ancient Hindu architecture has no parallel. Historians who ascribe such
marvels to Muslims do not realize that Islam has no ancient architectural texts [or
standards of construction methodology] of its own.

62. Photo # 56: [This] Leaning lamp tower on the way from Asoda to Karkande village in
Jalgaon District of Maharashtra is a rare specimen of Hindu architecture. The temple
connected to this lamp tower was destroyed in Muslim attacks.
Photographs of Various Pieces of Art With Vedic
Influence

63. Photo # 57: As in the headquarters of Christianity (namely the Vatican in Rome) at the
headquarters of Islam too (namely in the Kaaba temple in Mecca city of Saudi Arabia) the

64. ancient Hindu Shiva Linga may still be seen. This cylindrical stone, rendered immovable
for security by being fixed in the outer corner of a wall, is the object of reverence of all
Muslims. Here Muslims still continue the seven perambulations in the age old Hindu style
except that they move anti-clockwise. White silver foil shrouds the stone. The oval
uncovered central portion gives the pilgrims an idea of how the stone looks. Syrians had
once carried away the stone as a war trophy and kept it for 22 years.

66. Photo # 58: An Arab woman wearing the Hindu vermilion mark on her forehead in ancient
times when the world practised Hinduism.

68. Photo # 59: Hindu administrations, the Sanskrit language, Hindu culture and the Hindu
medical system–Ayurved, held sway throughout the ancient world. Monarchs then used to
attend court bare-bodied with sacred ash and colour marks on their bodies. This is an
Hindu Egyptian monarch of those times. [The ‘V’ mark is called tilok, and is shown being
worn by this Egyptian in the same style that it is still worn by Vaishnavas today in India,
on the forehead, arms, neck, chest and belly, representing that one is a worshiper of Lord
Krishna or Vishnu.]

69. Photo # 60: The Hindu architect of the pyramids looking at an unfolded architectural
scroll. He is wearing Hindu marks on his body. This should underline the need to

70. reconstruct the worldwide sway of Hinduism in ancient times currently wiped out of all
history.
Photo # 61: Bulls were worshipped in ancient Hindu Egypt as they are still worshipped in
Hindu India. The earliest explorers of Europe and Africa were Hindus. The river ‘Nile’
bears the Sanskrit name indicating her blue waters.

71. Photo # 62: This mosaic captioned “A Pastoral Scene” is of the 2nd
century A.D. and is on
display at the museum in Corinth, 60 Km. from Athens (Greece). Obviously this is Lord
Krishna the Hindu incarnation in his boyhood. The bare body, the horizontal flute, the
cross-legged stance, standing under a tree with a few cows grazing around is exactly how
Krishna is depicted in Hindu pictures. This is proof that in ancient Hindu Europe, Krishna
and Rama as much as the Shiva Linga were worshipped as they are still worshipped by
the Hindus in Hindusthan.

72. Photo # 63: Roman consul wearing the Hindu forehead mark indicating that in ancient
times Romans were Hindus. Roman emperors also sported the title ‘Dev’ as the

73. termination of their names in the Hindu royal style. [The ‘V’ mark is called tilok, and is
worn on the forehead to represent that one is a Vaishnava, a worshiper of Lord Krishna or
Vishnu.]

75. Photo # 64: A Roman superior wearing the Hindu/Vaisnava dhoti, chappals (sandals) and
Hindu/vedic/Vaisnava marks on his neck and forehead–reminding one of the times when
Europe practised Hinduism/Vaisnavism.
Photo # 65: A Ramayanic episode found painted in ancient Italian homes; Lav and Kusha
driving away a captured royal sacrificial horse belonging to their father Rama. The
founding of Rome is ascribed to brothers Remus and Ramulus–which are latter-day
variations of the Hindu name Rama.

76. Photo # 66: Vali and Sugreeva–two monkey chiefs disputing over a woman Tara whom
both claim as wife. Being monkeys they are undressed. This is one of the many
Ramayanic scenes found sketched in ancient Italian homes (this one is sketched on a
vase discovered in archaeological excavations in Italy).

77. Photo # 67: Rama-Seeta-Lakshmana walking through the forest in the order described in
the Ramayana, a scene delineated in ancient Italian homes. Italian archaeologists
express bewilderment at these paintings because they are unaware that ancient Europe
including Italy practised Hinduism.

78. Photo # 68: Three Hindu gods. The one at the left known as Ayu Devata (God of life) is
still invoked in Siberia if some near and dear one falls seriously ill. The other two are just
samples of the many gods and goddesses sold in the bazar of Ulan Bator, the capital of
Mongolia. These indicate how Hinduism prevailed in the ancient world. Even the Slav
people in Europe worshipped Hindu deities.

79. Photo # 69: A Ramayanic scene found painted in ancient Italian houses discovered in
archaeological excavations. Kausalya, Kaikeyi and Sumitra, wives of the aged king
Dasharath sharing the divine fertility potion to beget illustrious sons. The Dasharath
legend is also part of ancient Egyptian lore. All this shows that countries of Europe and
Africa were Hindu in ancient times.

80. Photo # 70: This is the Hindu deity form of Shiva. This piece is at present on view in the
Etruscan Museum at the Vatican in Rome. Encyclopedia Britannica mentions under the
headings “Etruria” and “Etruscan” that between the 2nd
and 7th
centuries BC, northern Italy
was known as Etruria. During excavations many such “meteoric stones mounted on
carved pedestals” are discovered in Italy. Obviously, therefore, this one was dug up from
the Vatican itself. Many more must be lying buried in the Vatican’s massive walls and

81. numerous cellars. Vatican is itself the Sanskrit word “Vatica” applied to Hindu cultural-
cum-religious centers as in “Ashrama-Vatica” or “Dharma-Vatica” or “Ananda-Vatica.”
Therefore, the Vatican was obviously a Hindu religious seat before its incumbent was
forced to accept Christianity.

82. Photo # 71: [There was no caption in the album for this photo of this drawing. However,
from other sources it is said to have been found in Italy. It is an illustration from

83. the Ramayana of Vibhishan, Ravana’s brother, ready to leave Lanka in battle-dress to join
Lord Rama. He is shown making one last appeal to Ravana to release Sita, Lord Rama’s
wife, shown sitting in the bottom corner.]

84. Photo # 72: The British coronation chair in Westminster Abbey in London. It has lions at
its four legs. (Only two front ones are seen in this photo.) This is because England’s royal

85. tradition is of Hindu origin. A Hindu king has to be crowned on a Simhasana, i.e. a Lion’s
Seat. The almond-colored square stone (seen in the shelf under the seat) is an ancient
Hindu memento carried from Delhi, i.e. Indraprastha by Hindu warriors when they first set
up throne in the distant British isles. [The following is a different caption under a replica
copy of the same photograph in the album.] It is no coincidence that this coronation chair
of British royalty in Westminster Abbey, London, is literally a Lion’s seat (simhasan) as it
is called in Hindu tradition. A cutpiece of an ancient Shiva Lingam serving several
vicissitudes may also be seen reverently placed in the compartment under the royal seat.
The sacred stone is known as the Stone of Destiny (Bhagyavidhata) alias stone of Scone
(because it was brought from a church in the city of Scone in Scotland, to London in 1296
A.D.). But before being brought to Scotland, it was at the Hill of Tara (Taragarh) in
Ireland. Thus, these two, i.e. the Simhasan & Shiva Lingam reaching back into
immemorial antiquity, are significant proof of Britain having once been a Hindu country
ruled by Hindu Kings. The lions are also of the Burmese and Mysorean Hindu design.

86. Photo # 73: An Australian bushman wearing the Hindu sandal/”tilak” mark on his
forehead in ancient times when the world practised Hinduism. A bell bearing Tamil
inscriptions once formed part of an Australian fisherman’s catch. The vast expanse of

87. water from the Americas to Australia, is known as the Indian Ocean precisely because the
Indian fleet held unchallenged sway over it. The word ‘navy’ is itself the Sanskrit word
“Navi” signifying boats.
Photo # 74: This is the cover of a 16th century book titled “The Cosmos and its
Mathematical Study” by the Persian author Mohamed-al-Tusi. It is found in the Egyptian
National Library, Cairo. The multi-armed deity (holding a book or Vedas, an axe, drum,
bunch of incense sticks, a lotus bud and a mouse) and the hexagonal platform on which
he sits, certainly shows the Vedic influence.

88. Photo # 75: From the British Museum, London, we find this inscription tablet from pre-
Islamic Arabia. The crescent and sun on top relate to the Vedic dictum “Yawachchandra
Diwakarau,” which signifies that the gift mentioned in the inscription should last as long as
the sun and moon. This crescent and sun is a Vedic symbol, which still can be seen in
use on the flags which adorn the top of the temple of Lord Jagannatha in Jagannatha
Puri, as well as on coins in Hindu Nepal. This symbol is in reference to the idea that it is
Lord Vishnu who is the source of the light for the sun and the moon. Thus, this symbol
which also adorns Islamic flags shows its Vedic influence.

89. Photo # 76: A typical ancient Vedic brass lamp from Saudi Arabia. Again it is a sign of the
Vedic influence that was and still is found in the Middle East and Arabia. Such lamps are
still used in India today. Stories of Allauddin, or Aladdin, and His Lamp come from ancient
Vedic India, although many give credit to Arabia.

90. Photo # 77: This image from pre-Islamic Saudi Arabia, displayed at the British Museum,
shows goddess Sarasvati riding a swan carrier.
Photo # 78: If one looks, a person can find reminders of the ancient Vedic culture in
numerous places, even where you least expect. Here for example is the image of the
Vedic Lord Shiva. This is found in Bologna, Italy on a public fountain. Notice the trident he

91. carries, along with the hoods of two snakes coiled around his neck on each of his
shoulders, typical of Shiva. Images resembling Ganesh, Shiva, Rama and Krishna have
been found in many archeological excavations throughout Italy, although not publicized by
Christians.