Susan Strickler, a bioengineer and founder of XL Biosystems Inc, together with two other co-
founders invested a total of $60,000 from personal funds as seed financing when they launched
their new venture in March 2022. Susan, who had the initial idea for XL and had invested the
greatest amount of sweat equity to date, invested $20,000 and received 50,000 shares of XL
common stock in return. The other two co-founders also invested $20,000 each and each received
25,000 shares. No other shares have been issued since. When the company was launched in
March 2022, the founders also secured the backing of Meg Hopkins, a local angel investor with
substantial and relevant experience in security systems. Meg invested $500,000 in XL with a post-
money SAFE. Terms of the SAFE included: (i) a conversion discount of 20% tied to the Series A
share price; (ii) a $1,000,000 minimum future financing for conversion of the SAFE; (iii) a post-
money valuation cap of $5,000,000 for the SAFE; and, (iv) if XL is acquired prior to a Series A
financing, Meg would receive 150% of the SAFEs principal investment amount. As of today (i.e.,
March 2023) they have successfully developed a working prototype of their revolutionary new
system-on-a-chip for detecting hazardous biological agents using micro-electro-mechanical
systems (MEMS) technology. Their MEMS biochip system has already attracted favorable
attention from a number of security systems companies. Carl Montgomery, a local angel investor
with substantial experience in security technologies, has been introduced to Susan by a trusted
acquaintance and is considering an investment in XL. Carl has reviewed XLs business plan and
has conducted enough due diligence to be comfortable with an investment in the company. XLs
business plan calls for two new rounds of financing. Carl is planning to be the Series A investor,
which is planned for March 2023 in the amount of $1,500,000. These funds will be used primarily
for hiring development engineers, for further product development and market research, and for
beta testing the prototype. The Series B financing is planned for March 2025 in the amount of
$11,000,000 primarily for hiring production engineers and marketing personnel, for initiating
marketing and distribution activities, and for launching production. Financial projections in the plan
estimate annual sales revenues of $15,000,000 by March 2027 under a success scenario. The
plan also anticipates that XL will be acquired by a strategic investor in March 2027, this being the
exit strategy for its investors. Carls due diligence has determined that a typical price/revenue ratio
for early growth biochip companies is about 3:1. Carl has introduced Susan to Leslie Neal, a
partner in Technology Ventures Corp. (TVC). TVC is a regional venture capital firm. Like Carl,
Leslie has significant experience with security technologies and feels that XL would be an ideal
complement to TVCs portfolio of high-tech startups. TVC has expr.
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
Susan Strickler a bioengineer and founder of XL Biosystems .pdf
1. Susan Strickler, a bioengineer and founder of XL Biosystems Inc, together with two other co-
founders invested a total of $60,000 from personal funds as seed financing when they launched
their new venture in March 2022. Susan, who had the initial idea for XL and had invested the
greatest amount of sweat equity to date, invested $20,000 and received 50,000 shares of XL
common stock in return. The other two co-founders also invested $20,000 each and each received
25,000 shares. No other shares have been issued since. When the company was launched in
March 2022, the founders also secured the backing of Meg Hopkins, a local angel investor with
substantial and relevant experience in security systems. Meg invested $500,000 in XL with a post-
money SAFE. Terms of the SAFE included: (i) a conversion discount of 20% tied to the Series A
share price; (ii) a $1,000,000 minimum future financing for conversion of the SAFE; (iii) a post-
money valuation cap of $5,000,000 for the SAFE; and, (iv) if XL is acquired prior to a Series A
financing, Meg would receive 150% of the SAFEs principal investment amount. As of today (i.e.,
March 2023) they have successfully developed a working prototype of their revolutionary new
system-on-a-chip for detecting hazardous biological agents using micro-electro-mechanical
systems (MEMS) technology. Their MEMS biochip system has already attracted favorable
attention from a number of security systems companies. Carl Montgomery, a local angel investor
with substantial experience in security technologies, has been introduced to Susan by a trusted
acquaintance and is considering an investment in XL. Carl has reviewed XLs business plan and
has conducted enough due diligence to be comfortable with an investment in the company. XLs
business plan calls for two new rounds of financing. Carl is planning to be the Series A investor,
which is planned for March 2023 in the amount of $1,500,000. These funds will be used primarily
for hiring development engineers, for further product development and market research, and for
beta testing the prototype. The Series B financing is planned for March 2025 in the amount of
$11,000,000 primarily for hiring production engineers and marketing personnel, for initiating
marketing and distribution activities, and for launching production. Financial projections in the plan
estimate annual sales revenues of $15,000,000 by March 2027 under a success scenario. The
plan also anticipates that XL will be acquired by a strategic investor in March 2027, this being the
exit strategy for its investors. Carls due diligence has determined that a typical price/revenue ratio
for early growth biochip companies is about 3:1. Carl has introduced Susan to Leslie Neal, a
partner in Technology Ventures Corp. (TVC). TVC is a regional venture capital firm. Like Carl,
Leslie has significant experience with security technologies and feels that XL would be an ideal
complement to TVCs portfolio of high-tech startups. TVC has expressed interest in funding the
Series B round of XLs financing plan, assuming that the venture continues to look promising and
achieves its interim milestone targets. TVC intends to invest in XL through its new TVC High-Tech
III Fund that includes funds from high net worth individuals and institutional investors. TVCs
objective is to earn an annual rate of return of 30% (compounded annually) on its investments to
cover both their general partner fees and their investors target returns. Question #1a. If Carls
targeted rate of return is 40% per annum (compounded), what share of XL (i.e., what % of the
company) must he acquire in March 2023 if he funds the full $1,500,000 Series A round? How
many new shares of XL stock should he acquire? What should be the price per share? What are
XLs pre-money and post-money valuations at this first round? Question #1b. If TVC funds the
entire Series B round, what share of XL must TVC acquire in March 2025? How many new shares
2. of XL stock should TVC acquire? What should be the price per share? What are XLs pre-money
and post-money valuations at the second round? Question #2. At the planned liquidity event at
March 2027, what will Susans XL shares be worth? What annual rate of return (compounded) on
her original $20,000 investment does this represent? What will each of the other co-founders
shares be worth? What annual rates of return (compounded) on their original $20,000 investments
does this represent? What will Megs converted shares be worth? What annual rate of return
(compounded) on her original $500,000 investment does this represent? Finally, explain the
reason for any difference between the return earned by Susan and that earned by each of her
other two co-founders. Question #3. Susan briefly considered the alternative of eliminating the
Series B round and, instead, raising the total amount of $12,500,000 in the Series A round. She
assumed the investors would require a 40% per annum (compounded) rate of return. After
analyzing this alternative, Susan did not pursue it. Why did she decide this? Question #4. Based
on their prior experience, both Carl and Leslie believe that stock options will be needed as
incentives to recruit a senior management team for XL. They convince Susan to plan for the future
creation of a pool of new XL shares for incentive stock options equal, in total, to 12% of the
company at the time of the liquidity event at March 2027. Given this plan to create a future pool of
incentive stock options immediately prior to the liquidity event, recalculate your answers to
Questions #1a, #1b and #2. Question #5. Immediately before the Series B round, it becomes
apparent that the liquidity event will be delayed two years until March 2029 and that an additional
$1,000,000 (i.e., a total of $12,000,000) will be needed in Series B, still scheduled to occur in
March 2025. Despite the delay, the estimated terminal value of XL remains unchanged. At the
time when this delay becomes apparent, Carls Series A investment is already a done-deal and
cannot be renegotiated. The future stock option pool, as described above, is included in XLs
plans. Recalculate your answers to Question #4. Also, given this delay scenario, what compound
annual rates of return are actually realized on the Series A and Series B investments? Question
#6. During TVCs term sheet negotiations, it is agreed that TVC will receive convertible preferred
XL stock in return for their investment in Series B. The founders shares, Carls Series A shares and
the option pool shares remain common stock. The difference between common and preferred
shares is that preferred shareholders receive a fixed annual dividend payment equal to a
prescribed percentage of their investment. In this case, TVC negotiates for a cumulative non-cash
non-compounding dividend of 8% per annum. At the time of the liquidity event at March 2027,
each preferred share is convertible into one new XL common share and the accumulated
dividends are convertible into new XL common shares at the original price per share paid by TVC.
TVC priced the XL deal assuming that it received non-dividend-bearing common stock and that an
option pool would be created at the time of the liquidity event (i.e., the same assumptions used for
Question #4, above). Note: the option pool equals 12% of the company, including the new
converted dividend shares, at the time of the liquidity event in March 2027. What compound
annual rate of return will TVC realize on its Series B investment as a result of using convertible
preferred stock? What compound annual rate of return will be realized from Carls Series A
investment, which is not convertible preferred stock? What will be the cash distributions realized
by the founders and Meg? (In answering this question, ignore the delay scenario of Question #5).
Question #7. During TVCs Series B term sheet negotiations, TVC also proposed using a hybrid
3. security called participating preferred stock for its investment. This security is like the convertible
preferred stock described above, but it has an additional benefit in that, at conversion (i.e., at the
liquidity event) the entire original purchase price is also repaid to TVC on a priority basis before
any other distributions are calculated. Susan and Carl reject this proposal. What compound annual
rate of return would TVC have realized on its Series B investment as a result of using participating
preferred stock? What compound annual rate of return would Carl have realized under this
proposal on his Series A investment? What will be the cash distributions realized by the founders
and Meg?