Supporting Faculty in the ANGEL Virtual Classroom Melanie Bartlett Assistant Director – Center for Teaching and Learning David Rausch, PhD Director – Center for Teaching and Learning
Supporting The Faculty-Technology Relationship Advantages Enabling Learners Increasing Immediacy Challenges Enabling Learners Increasing Immediacy
Instructor/Student Expectations Set clear expectations for turnaround time Establish types of feedback (acknowledgement, content, automated) Distinguish variety and level of support and developmental interaction Manage perceptions of legitimate feedback
Learner Centered Instructors Learner Centered Faculty Support Reconceptualized documentation Peer to Peer mentoring / modeling Focus on technologies inside and outside the face-to-face classroom Learning support is active, collaborative and social Support recognizes individual pace and capabilities
Faculty Support Philosophy Communicating our model Keeping in touch Maintaining quality standards Support gaps harm faculty
Faculty as Students in the Virtual Classroom
Technology Readiness Assessment Technology Primer 3 hours synchronous  instruction Macomb Online Instructor Training Certification (MOITC) Eight week online course Pass Yes No
Macomb Online Instructor Training Certification (MOITC)
Technology Readiness Assessment Technology Primer 3 hours synchronous  instruction Macomb Online Instructor Training Certification (MOITC) Eight week online course or Virtual Basics - Three hours synchronous instruction or asynchronous tutorial -Three online modules Pass Yes No
ANGEL Basics
Technology Readiness Assessment Technology Primer 3 hours live or virtual instruction Macomb Online Instructor Training Course (MOITC) Eight week online course or Virtual Basics - Three hours synchronous instruction or asynchronous tutorial -Three online modules Pass Yes No Certified Assessments and Assignments Learning Object Repositories Gradebook Synchronous Discussion Forums Communication -Two and one/half hours synchronous instruction -One online module
ASSESSMENT OF INSTRUCTOR READINESS Assessment of Instructor Readiness
 
 
What happens when faculty do not complete an exercise successfully?
 
 
 
 
Training Formats
Synchronous F2F
Synchronous Virtual
Asynchronous Tutorials Discussion Forums
Faculty Support
Technical Support for Faculty Support team Asynchronous support Synchronous sessions
Other Services
Course Design Support for Faculty Provide Course Review course(s) Asynchronous support Synchronous sessions
Asynchronous Support
Open Lab
Adobe Connect Pro
Questions?
References Kubala, 1998 Collison et al., 2000 Eklund & Eklund, 1996 Newman et al., 1999; Shapley, 2000 Haggerty et al., 2001 Kassop, 2003 Rovai, 2004 Speck 1996 (Hiltz & Wellman, 1997; Markel, 2001; Sullivan, 2002).  Adam Finkelstein, adam.finkelstein@mcgill.edu Brendan Guenther brendan@msu.edu Brandon Blinkenberg bran@msu.edu

Supporting Faculty In The Angel Virtual Classroom

  • 1.
    Supporting Faculty inthe ANGEL Virtual Classroom Melanie Bartlett Assistant Director – Center for Teaching and Learning David Rausch, PhD Director – Center for Teaching and Learning
  • 2.
    Supporting The Faculty-TechnologyRelationship Advantages Enabling Learners Increasing Immediacy Challenges Enabling Learners Increasing Immediacy
  • 3.
    Instructor/Student Expectations Setclear expectations for turnaround time Establish types of feedback (acknowledgement, content, automated) Distinguish variety and level of support and developmental interaction Manage perceptions of legitimate feedback
  • 4.
    Learner Centered InstructorsLearner Centered Faculty Support Reconceptualized documentation Peer to Peer mentoring / modeling Focus on technologies inside and outside the face-to-face classroom Learning support is active, collaborative and social Support recognizes individual pace and capabilities
  • 5.
    Faculty Support PhilosophyCommunicating our model Keeping in touch Maintaining quality standards Support gaps harm faculty
  • 6.
    Faculty as Studentsin the Virtual Classroom
  • 7.
    Technology Readiness AssessmentTechnology Primer 3 hours synchronous instruction Macomb Online Instructor Training Certification (MOITC) Eight week online course Pass Yes No
  • 8.
    Macomb Online InstructorTraining Certification (MOITC)
  • 9.
    Technology Readiness AssessmentTechnology Primer 3 hours synchronous instruction Macomb Online Instructor Training Certification (MOITC) Eight week online course or Virtual Basics - Three hours synchronous instruction or asynchronous tutorial -Three online modules Pass Yes No
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Technology Readiness AssessmentTechnology Primer 3 hours live or virtual instruction Macomb Online Instructor Training Course (MOITC) Eight week online course or Virtual Basics - Three hours synchronous instruction or asynchronous tutorial -Three online modules Pass Yes No Certified Assessments and Assignments Learning Object Repositories Gradebook Synchronous Discussion Forums Communication -Two and one/half hours synchronous instruction -One online module
  • 12.
    ASSESSMENT OF INSTRUCTORREADINESS Assessment of Instructor Readiness
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    What happens whenfaculty do not complete an exercise successfully?
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Technical Support forFaculty Support team Asynchronous support Synchronous sessions
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Course Design Supportfor Faculty Provide Course Review course(s) Asynchronous support Synchronous sessions
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
    References Kubala, 1998Collison et al., 2000 Eklund & Eklund, 1996 Newman et al., 1999; Shapley, 2000 Haggerty et al., 2001 Kassop, 2003 Rovai, 2004 Speck 1996 (Hiltz & Wellman, 1997; Markel, 2001; Sullivan, 2002). Adam Finkelstein, adam.finkelstein@mcgill.edu Brendan Guenther brendan@msu.edu Brandon Blinkenberg bran@msu.edu

Editor's Notes

  • #2 David: Welcome to the AUC 2009 and to our faculty support session. My name is David Rausch. I am the director of the CTL at Macomb Community College. My background includes a number of years as an executive in the financial industry in the US and throughout Asia in South Africa. I have worked as a college faculty (in a full-time and adjunct capacity), and administration . My graduate degree is in business (finance) and my doctoral work focused on leadership roles, adult learning theory and experiential learning. I would like to introduce Melanie Bartlett. Melanie: Hi, I am the assistant director of the CTL at Macomb Community College in the Metro Detroit area. I spent a few years with General Motors Technical Education Program working with several colleges (UM, Carnegie Mellon, Kettering), to take their courses from videotape delayed to the virtual classroom. I also spent some time with Accenture consulting in Change Management and designing training and communications for a large Supply Chain Project. I also work as an adjunct faculty in the business program at Macomb.