Wealth Management
Case Study– John & Betty Smith
John & Betty Smith
John and Betty recently
completed the sale of their
business and are looking
forward to a long and fulfilling
retirement.
JOHN
(AGE 60)
BETTY
(AGE 58)
4 CHILDREN
9 GRANDCHILDREN
Example
Prioritized List of Goals
Financially Secure Retirement
Education of Grandchildren
Build Second Home in Iowa
Annual Gifts to Children
Donate Money to Charity
Maintain the Principal Value of Estate
Investments $5,000,000
Home $800,000
Land in Iowa $200,000
Total of Assets $6,000,000
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Education of Grandchildren $30,000/year for 10
years
Gifts to Children $30,000/year
Retirement Income $200,000/year
Gifts to Charity $20,000/year
Total of Annual Liabilities $280,000/annually
Build Second Home in Iowa $400,000 (one time)
Investment Assets $4,600,000
PRODUCTIVE ASSETS
USE ASSETS
Home $800,000
Land in Iowa $200,000
Set Aside for Second Home $400,000
LIABILITIES
Their annual commitments total $280,000 or approximately 6.1%
of their investment assets
QUESTION
With $4,600,000, can the Smith’s afford to fulfill their goals?
Hierarchy of Investment Priorities
High Returns - Growth
Low Volatility of Account
Consistency of Returns
Asset Growth
Fees (Lowest Possible)
Preservation of Income
Out Performing the Market
Finding Great Stock
Buying Hot Fund
Studying Economic Activities
Employing Market Timing Strategies
Finding Opportunities in the Markets
Understanding Your Investment Process
Making All Investment Decision
Not Running Out Of Money
Hedge Funds
Direct Real Estate
Venture Capital
Finding Highest Performing Money Manager
High Returns - Growth
Low Volatility of Account
Consistency of Returns
Asset Growth
Fees (Lowest Possible)
Preservation of Income
Out Performing the Market
Finding Great Stock
Buying Hot Fund
Studying Economic Activities
Employing Market Timing Strategies
Finding Opportunities in the Markets
Understanding Your Investment Process
Making All Investment Decision
Not Running Out Of Money
Hedge Funds
Direct Real Estate
Venture Capital
Finding Highest Performing Money Manager
Hierarchy of Investment Priorities
1
3
5
4
2
Asset Allocation? Assumed Return?
Asset Allocation Assumed Return: 8.61%
65% Equity/ 35% Fixed Return Downside: -11.8%
Cash
2%
Bonds
33%
Stock
65%
Retirement Funding Analysis
Current Age
Mortality Age
Inflation Rate
Annual Rate of Return
Desired Retirement Income
Retirement Investments
Lump Sum at End of Retirement
ASSUMPTIONS
60
90
3%
8.6%
$280,000
$4,600,000
$1,000,000
RESULTS
Amount needed at retirement
Total at Beginning of Retirement
Surplus/Deficit
$4,105,625
$4,600,000
$494,374
Probability of Falling Below $0
Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 13.2% 37.1%
Note: “SD” = Standard Deviation
In Thousands
Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,767 $9,552 $15,075 $22,462 $37,724
84% - (1 sd) 5,152 6,859 8,835 11,282 16,458
50% - Expected Case 4,660 4,830 4,863 4,591 3,135
16% - (-1 sd) 4,209 3,358 2,372 359 0
2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,851 2,396 668 0 0
Note: "sd" = standard deviation
Simulation Results - Range of Assets
Asset Allocation Assumed Return: 9.51%
80% Equity / 20% Fixed Return Downside: -13.3%
Cash
2%
Bonds
18%
Stock
80%
Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 11.5% 32.5%
In Thousands
Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
98% - (2 sd) Best Case $6,101 $11,353 $22,985 $38,267 $57,470
84% - (1 sd) 5,293 7,308 10,775 15,835 27,269
50% - Expected Case 4,721 5,084 5,704 6,048 6,075
16% - (-1 sd) 4,102 3,239 2,572 902 0
2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,737 2,303 312 0 0
Note: "sd" = standard deviation
Simulation Results - Range of Assets
Probability of Falling Below $0
Revised Goals
Education of Grandchildren
Gifts to Children
Retirement Income
Gifts to Charity
Annual Total Expenditures
Value of Estate
REVISEDORIGINALGOALS
QUESTION
With the revised annual commitments of $230,000 (5.0%) can
John and Betty fulfill their goals?
$30,000/10 years
$30,000
$200,000
$20,000
$280,000
$1,000,000
$30,000
$10,000
$190,000
Suspend
$230,000
$1,000,000
Asset Allocation Assumed Return: 8.31%
60% Equity / 40% Fixed Return Downside: -11.3%
Cash
2%
Bonds
38%
Stock
60%
Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 0.5% 5.3%
In Thousands
Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,693 $9,900 $16,673 $26,172 $47,883
84% - (1 sd) 5,137 7,582 10,917 15,676 25,561
50% - Expected Case 4,662 5,669 7,004 8,687 10,980
16% - (-1 sd) 4,257 4,189 4,232 4,178 3,495
2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,888 3,174 2,484 1,276 0
Note: "sd" = standard deviation
Simulation Results - Range of Assets
Probability of Falling Below $0
Cash
5%
Muni Bonds
30%
High Yield
5%
Large
Growth
40%
Large Value
10%
Small
Growth
10%
Asset Allocation - Current Assumed Return: 8.76%
60% Equity / 40% Fixed Return Downside: -11.3%
Asset Class Actual Allocation Target Allocation Drift
Large Growth 40% 15% 25%
Large Core - 10% (10%)
Large Value 10% 15% (5%)
Small Growth 10% - 10%
Small Value - 10% (10%)
International - 10% (10%)
Total Equities 60% 60% -
Municipal Bonds 30% 38% (8%)
High Yield 5% - 5%
Cash 5% 2% 3%
Total Fixed Income 40% 40% -
Total 100% 100% -
In Thousands
Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,884 $11,143 $18,711 $32,337 $60,658
84% - (1 sd) 5,209 7,975 11,801 17,245 29,891
50% - Expected Case 4,679 5,600 7,070 8,905 11,632
16% - (-1 sd) 4,188 3,988 3,985 3,577 2,790
2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,801 2,891 1,918 583 0
Note: "sd" = standard deviation
Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 1.1% 8.1%
Simulation Results - Range of Assets
Probability of Falling Below $0
Before-Tax Returns
Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
98% - (2 sd) Best Case 40.6% 18.5% 15.5% 13.8% 12.8%
84% - (1 sd) 24.4% 13.2% 11.8% 11.1% 10.5%
50% - Expected Case 8.5% 8.3% 8.4% 8.4% 8.4%
16% - (-1 sd) -4.6% 4.1% 5.2% 5.7% 6.2%
2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case -15.2% -0.7% 2.2% 3.1% 4.1%
Note: "sd" = standard deviation
Simulation Results - Range of Assets
Cash
2%
Muni Bonds
38%
Large
Growth
15%Large Core
10%
Large Value
15%
Small Value
10%
Int'l Growth
5%
Int'l Value
5%
Asset Allocation - Proposed Assumed Return: 8.31%
60% Equity/ 40% Fixed Return Downside: -10.5%
Asset Class Actual Allocation Target Allocation Drift
Large Growth 15% 15% -
Large Core 10% 10% -
Large Value 15% 15% -
Small Growth 10% - 10%
Small Value 5% 10% (5%)
International 5% 10% (5%)
Total Equities 60% 60% -
Municipal Bonds 38% 38% -
Cash 2% 2% -
Total Fixed Income 40% 40% -
Total 100% 100% -
In Thousands
Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,693 $9,900 $16,673 $26,172 $47,883
84% - (1 sd) 5,137 7,582 10,917 15,676 25,561
50% - Expected Case 4,662 5,669 7,004 8,687 10,980
16% - (-1 sd) 4,257 4,189 4,232 4,178 3,495
2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,888 3,174 2,484 1,276 0
Note: "sd" = standard deviation
Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 0.5% 5.3%
Simulation Results - Range of Assets
Probability of Falling Below $0
Before-Tax Returns
Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30
98% - (2 sd) Best Case 34.5% 16.8% 14.1% 13.0% 12.5%
84% - (1 sd) 21.5% 12.5% 11.4% 10.8% 10.5%
50% - Expected Case 8.5% 8.8% 8.7% 8.7% 8.6%
16% - (-1 sd) -2.5% 5.2% 6.0% 6.4% 6.8%
2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case -11.7% 1.5% 3.6% 4.2% 4.8%
Note: "sd" = standard deviation
Simulation Results - Range of Assets

Case Study: John & Betty

  • 1.
  • 2.
    John & BettySmith John and Betty recently completed the sale of their business and are looking forward to a long and fulfilling retirement. JOHN (AGE 60) BETTY (AGE 58) 4 CHILDREN 9 GRANDCHILDREN Example
  • 3.
    Prioritized List ofGoals Financially Secure Retirement Education of Grandchildren Build Second Home in Iowa Annual Gifts to Children Donate Money to Charity Maintain the Principal Value of Estate
  • 4.
    Investments $5,000,000 Home $800,000 Landin Iowa $200,000 Total of Assets $6,000,000 ASSETS LIABILITIES Education of Grandchildren $30,000/year for 10 years Gifts to Children $30,000/year Retirement Income $200,000/year Gifts to Charity $20,000/year Total of Annual Liabilities $280,000/annually Build Second Home in Iowa $400,000 (one time)
  • 5.
    Investment Assets $4,600,000 PRODUCTIVEASSETS USE ASSETS Home $800,000 Land in Iowa $200,000 Set Aside for Second Home $400,000 LIABILITIES Their annual commitments total $280,000 or approximately 6.1% of their investment assets QUESTION With $4,600,000, can the Smith’s afford to fulfill their goals?
  • 6.
    Hierarchy of InvestmentPriorities High Returns - Growth Low Volatility of Account Consistency of Returns Asset Growth Fees (Lowest Possible) Preservation of Income Out Performing the Market Finding Great Stock Buying Hot Fund Studying Economic Activities Employing Market Timing Strategies Finding Opportunities in the Markets Understanding Your Investment Process Making All Investment Decision Not Running Out Of Money Hedge Funds Direct Real Estate Venture Capital Finding Highest Performing Money Manager
  • 7.
    High Returns -Growth Low Volatility of Account Consistency of Returns Asset Growth Fees (Lowest Possible) Preservation of Income Out Performing the Market Finding Great Stock Buying Hot Fund Studying Economic Activities Employing Market Timing Strategies Finding Opportunities in the Markets Understanding Your Investment Process Making All Investment Decision Not Running Out Of Money Hedge Funds Direct Real Estate Venture Capital Finding Highest Performing Money Manager Hierarchy of Investment Priorities 1 3 5 4 2
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Asset Allocation AssumedReturn: 8.61% 65% Equity/ 35% Fixed Return Downside: -11.8% Cash 2% Bonds 33% Stock 65%
  • 10.
    Retirement Funding Analysis CurrentAge Mortality Age Inflation Rate Annual Rate of Return Desired Retirement Income Retirement Investments Lump Sum at End of Retirement ASSUMPTIONS 60 90 3% 8.6% $280,000 $4,600,000 $1,000,000 RESULTS Amount needed at retirement Total at Beginning of Retirement Surplus/Deficit $4,105,625 $4,600,000 $494,374
  • 11.
    Probability of FallingBelow $0 Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 13.2% 37.1% Note: “SD” = Standard Deviation In Thousands Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,767 $9,552 $15,075 $22,462 $37,724 84% - (1 sd) 5,152 6,859 8,835 11,282 16,458 50% - Expected Case 4,660 4,830 4,863 4,591 3,135 16% - (-1 sd) 4,209 3,358 2,372 359 0 2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,851 2,396 668 0 0 Note: "sd" = standard deviation Simulation Results - Range of Assets
  • 12.
    Asset Allocation AssumedReturn: 9.51% 80% Equity / 20% Fixed Return Downside: -13.3% Cash 2% Bonds 18% Stock 80%
  • 13.
    Year 1 Year8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 11.5% 32.5% In Thousands Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 98% - (2 sd) Best Case $6,101 $11,353 $22,985 $38,267 $57,470 84% - (1 sd) 5,293 7,308 10,775 15,835 27,269 50% - Expected Case 4,721 5,084 5,704 6,048 6,075 16% - (-1 sd) 4,102 3,239 2,572 902 0 2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,737 2,303 312 0 0 Note: "sd" = standard deviation Simulation Results - Range of Assets Probability of Falling Below $0
  • 14.
    Revised Goals Education ofGrandchildren Gifts to Children Retirement Income Gifts to Charity Annual Total Expenditures Value of Estate REVISEDORIGINALGOALS QUESTION With the revised annual commitments of $230,000 (5.0%) can John and Betty fulfill their goals? $30,000/10 years $30,000 $200,000 $20,000 $280,000 $1,000,000 $30,000 $10,000 $190,000 Suspend $230,000 $1,000,000
  • 15.
    Asset Allocation AssumedReturn: 8.31% 60% Equity / 40% Fixed Return Downside: -11.3% Cash 2% Bonds 38% Stock 60%
  • 16.
    Year 1 Year8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 0.5% 5.3% In Thousands Probabilities Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,693 $9,900 $16,673 $26,172 $47,883 84% - (1 sd) 5,137 7,582 10,917 15,676 25,561 50% - Expected Case 4,662 5,669 7,004 8,687 10,980 16% - (-1 sd) 4,257 4,189 4,232 4,178 3,495 2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,888 3,174 2,484 1,276 0 Note: "sd" = standard deviation Simulation Results - Range of Assets Probability of Falling Below $0
  • 17.
    Cash 5% Muni Bonds 30% High Yield 5% Large Growth 40% LargeValue 10% Small Growth 10% Asset Allocation - Current Assumed Return: 8.76% 60% Equity / 40% Fixed Return Downside: -11.3%
  • 18.
    Asset Class ActualAllocation Target Allocation Drift Large Growth 40% 15% 25% Large Core - 10% (10%) Large Value 10% 15% (5%) Small Growth 10% - 10% Small Value - 10% (10%) International - 10% (10%) Total Equities 60% 60% - Municipal Bonds 30% 38% (8%) High Yield 5% - 5% Cash 5% 2% 3% Total Fixed Income 40% 40% - Total 100% 100% -
  • 19.
    In Thousands Probabilities Year1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,884 $11,143 $18,711 $32,337 $60,658 84% - (1 sd) 5,209 7,975 11,801 17,245 29,891 50% - Expected Case 4,679 5,600 7,070 8,905 11,632 16% - (-1 sd) 4,188 3,988 3,985 3,577 2,790 2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,801 2,891 1,918 583 0 Note: "sd" = standard deviation Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 1.1% 8.1% Simulation Results - Range of Assets Probability of Falling Below $0
  • 20.
    Before-Tax Returns Probabilities Year1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 98% - (2 sd) Best Case 40.6% 18.5% 15.5% 13.8% 12.8% 84% - (1 sd) 24.4% 13.2% 11.8% 11.1% 10.5% 50% - Expected Case 8.5% 8.3% 8.4% 8.4% 8.4% 16% - (-1 sd) -4.6% 4.1% 5.2% 5.7% 6.2% 2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case -15.2% -0.7% 2.2% 3.1% 4.1% Note: "sd" = standard deviation Simulation Results - Range of Assets
  • 21.
    Cash 2% Muni Bonds 38% Large Growth 15%Large Core 10% LargeValue 15% Small Value 10% Int'l Growth 5% Int'l Value 5% Asset Allocation - Proposed Assumed Return: 8.31% 60% Equity/ 40% Fixed Return Downside: -10.5%
  • 22.
    Asset Class ActualAllocation Target Allocation Drift Large Growth 15% 15% - Large Core 10% 10% - Large Value 15% 15% - Small Growth 10% - 10% Small Value 5% 10% (5%) International 5% 10% (5%) Total Equities 60% 60% - Municipal Bonds 38% 38% - Cash 2% 2% - Total Fixed Income 40% 40% - Total 100% 100% -
  • 23.
    In Thousands Probabilities Year1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 98% - (2 sd) Best Case $5,693 $9,900 $16,673 $26,172 $47,883 84% - (1 sd) 5,137 7,582 10,917 15,676 25,561 50% - Expected Case 4,662 5,669 7,004 8,687 10,980 16% - (-1 sd) 4,257 4,189 4,232 4,178 3,495 2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case 3,888 3,174 2,484 1,276 0 Note: "sd" = standard deviation Year 1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 Probabilities 0% 0% 0% 0.5% 5.3% Simulation Results - Range of Assets Probability of Falling Below $0
  • 24.
    Before-Tax Returns Probabilities Year1 Year 8 Year 15 Year 22 Year 30 98% - (2 sd) Best Case 34.5% 16.8% 14.1% 13.0% 12.5% 84% - (1 sd) 21.5% 12.5% 11.4% 10.8% 10.5% 50% - Expected Case 8.5% 8.8% 8.7% 8.7% 8.6% 16% - (-1 sd) -2.5% 5.2% 6.0% 6.4% 6.8% 2% - (-2 sd) Worst Case -11.7% 1.5% 3.6% 4.2% 4.8% Note: "sd" = standard deviation Simulation Results - Range of Assets