SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE
, VOL. , NO. , –
http://dx.doi.org/./..
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Prescription Opioid Craving: Relationship With Pain and Substance Use-Related
Characteristics
Lisham Ashrafiouna , b
a Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA; b VISN Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention,
Canandaigua VA Medical Center, Canandaigua, New York, USA
KEYWORDS
Craving; prescription opioids;
pain; desire; opiates
ABSTRACT
Background: Craving is associated with prescription opioid use in opioid-addicted pain patients. Objec-
tives: This study evaluated the relationship between craving for prescription opioids and selected
pain and substance use characteristics. Method: In this cross-sectional study, patients (N = 106) being
treated for opioid dependence were recruited from one of three sites from December 2012 to April
2013. Participants completed the multi-dimensional Desire for Drugs Questionnaire to assess crav-
ing, and other questionnaires to assess pain, substance use, and demographic characteristics. Data
were analyzed using Pearson product-by-moment correlations, ANOVAs, and multiple linear regres-
sions. Results: At the bivariate level, desire-and-intention to use prescription opioids and craving for
relief from negative states were positively associated with both pain severity and interference. Lin-
ear regression analyses revealed significant positive associations between Desire-and-Intention sub-
scale scores and obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors associated with prescription opioids
and pain severity. Negative Reinforcement subscales scores were positively associated with obsessive
thoughts and compulsive behaviors associated with prescription opioids and the outcome expectan-
cies of pain reduction, but not pain severity. Conclusions/Importance: This study extended previous
research assessing the link between pain and craving by demonstrating that desire-and-intention, but
not craving for the negative reinforcing effects are associated with pain severity after considering var-
ious substance use characteristics. Additional research is needed to clarify the relationship between
pain and aspects of craving while also considering pain-specific covariates. This study highlights that
the multi-dimensionality of craving is an important aspect to consider when clinicians and researchers
evaluate the relationship between pain and craving.
Prescription opioid misuse has increased dramatically in
the past decade (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Ser-
vices Administration, 2013a, 2013b). Research has shown
that pain is common among patients with substance use
disorders (SUDs), and in particular with opioid use dis-
orders. For example, Trafton, Oliva, Horst, Minkel, &
Humphreys (2004) reported that 52% of patients receiv-
ing treatment for opioid addiction reported moderate to
severe pain. Among SUD patients, pain has been associ-
ated with hig.
Fear of withdrawal perpetuates opioid use in CNP.Paul Coelho, MD
This document discusses a study that examined reasons for prescription opioid use among patients seeking treatment for opioid dependence. The study found that participants with chronic pain were more likely to report using opioids initially for pain relief, while avoiding withdrawal was the most common reason for current use among all participants. Participants with chronic pain rated coping with physical pain as a more important reason for use, and social or craving reasons as less important, compared to those without chronic pain. The results highlight the role of physical pain as a key reason for opioid use among patients with dependence who have chronic pain conditions.
This study investigated the relationship between pain catastrophizing and outcomes in 253 chronic pain patients prescribed opioids in primary care settings. Patients completed measures of pain catastrophizing, intensity, disability, side effects, and opioid misuse at baseline and 6-month follow up. The results showed that patients with high catastrophizing reported greater pain, disability, negative affect, side effects, and opioid misuse compared to low catastrophizing patients, both at baseline and over 6 months. Higher catastrophizing was associated with worse pain outcomes and increased risk of opioid misuse among chronic pain patients prescribed opioids in primary care.
FIRST DRAFT1FIRST DRAFT9First DraftErica K.docxAKHIL969626
FIRST DRAFT 1
FIRST DRAFT 9
First Draft
Erica K. Fernandez
Argosy University
Pain Management for Patients with Addiction Problems
Thesis Statement
The ability of clinicians to keep patients in check has proven to be a challenge, especially with concerns regarding the legitimacy and physical functions affecting overall pain management in patients with an addiction problem.
Background
The treatment modalities for chronic pain using COT in active drug users or those who are in remission present a significant challenge for clinicians who oversee the effectiveness of the intervention. Moreover, such notions are correlated to the concerns of patients experiencing a relapse to substance abuse during the duration of therapy since analgesics may obscure drug-seeking behaviours that are characteristic of addictive diseases. This results in poor treatment outcomes where patients are likely to be discharged prematurely from pain care treatment (Ballantyne & Mao, 2003). Additionally, there is the widespread misconception that chronic pain patients with an addiction problem often encounter health professionals who possess inadequate training in clinical guidelines that are related to comorbidities of chronic pain and related addiction issues. Moreover, there exists a dilemma for the treatment of abstinent and former heroin addicts as they are at a high risk of relapsing to addiction if they are exposed to opioid drugs. They also face the risk of relapsing if they are not accorded sufficient care. For people who are already on opioid medication such as methadone often experience challenges responding to pain relievers when they are hospitalized. In such as case, the fundamental principle of management denotes the prevention of withdrawals by initiating methadone for heroin users while providing additional analgesia as recommended while confirming whether the pain relief is satisfactory (Chou et al., 2009). Additionally, most physicians have developed a phobia of over prescribing narcotics as pain relievers. Perhaps this may be attributed to the fear of the legal repercussions that may ensue including the divergences in federal guidelines on matters about the use of narcotics as a pain reliever. Thus, it is the responsibility of the individual practitioner to offer pain management using opioids for legitimate standard and by the regulation of medical practice.
Objective
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the challenges that are faced by clinicians in pain treatment for patients with addiction problems. On the other hand, the study focuses on offering a counter-argument to the thesis by providing ideal solutions for pain management for patients with SUDs. Additionally, the research intends to highlight the complex interconnection that exists between pain management and addiction to opioids.
Supporting Points
For clinicians, the hardest challenge is perhaps knowing the right way to handle patients who require pain medication, ...
5069 -Module 4 The Value of Information and CostsHomework .docxalinainglis
5069 -Module 4 The Value of Information and Costs
Homework 4
Class,
Do a search on the internet and find a company that does this well reliability measures, and write up a page telling me what this company does and why it does well with this area.
Running head: PAIN MANAGEMENT AND ADDICTION 1
PAIN MANAGEMENT AND ADDICTION 7
Pain Management and Addiction
Name
Institution
Pain Management for Patients with Addiction Problems
Thesis Statement
The ability of clinicians to keep patients in check has proven to be a challenge, especially with concerns regarding the legitimacy and physical functions affecting overall pain management in patients with an addiction problem.
Background
The treatment modalities for chronic pain using COT in active drug users or those who are in remission presents a significant challenge for clinicians who oversee the effectiveness of the intervention. Moreover, such notions are correlated to the concerns of patients experiencing a relapse to substance abuse during the duration of therapy since analgesics may obscure drug seeking behaviors that are characteristic of addictive diseases. This results in poor treatment outcomes where patients are likely to be discharged prematurely from pain care treatment. Additionally, there is the widespread misconception that chronic pain patients with an addiction problem often encounter health professionals who possess inadequate training in clinical guidelines that are related to comorbidities of chronic pain and related addiction issues. Moreover, there exists a dilemma for the treatment of abstinent and former heroin addicts as they are at a high risk of relapsing to addiction if they are exposed to opioid drugs. They also face the risk of relapsing if they are not accorded sufficient care. For people who are already on opioid medication such as methadone often experience challenges responding to pain relievers when they are hospitalized. In such as case, the fundamental principle of management denotes the prevention of withdrawals by initiating methadone for heroin users while providing additional analgesia as recommended while confirming whether the pain relief is satisfactory. Additionally, most physicians have developed a phobia of overprescription of narcotics as pain relievers. Perhaps this may be attributed to the fear of the legal repercussions that may ensue including the divergences in federal guidelines on matters about use of narcotics as a pain reliever. Thus, it is the responsibility of the individual practitioner to offer pain management using opioids for legitimate standard and by the regulation of medical practice.
Objective
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the challenges that are faced by clinicians in pain treatment for patients with addiction problems. On the other hand, the study focuses on offering a counter argument to the thesis by providing ideal solutions for pain management for patients with SUDs. Additionally, the rese.
This study compared chronic pain patients whose symptoms were considered medically unexplained (cases) to those whose symptoms had clear medical explanations (controls). The key findings were:
1. Medically unexplained symptoms were associated with higher rates of psychiatric morbidity, including a 3.4 times higher odds of any psychiatric diagnosis.
2. Cases reported more potential iatrogenic factors like over-investigation and over-treatment from healthcare providers compared to controls.
3. There were no significant differences between cases and controls in rates of medication abuse or dependence.
This paper examines the relationship between socioeconomic factors and prescription drug abuse. It reviews 7 studies that found higher rates of opioid misuse among low-income populations, including Medicaid patients and those with mental health or substance abuse disorders. While doctors often perceive younger and non-white patients to be at higher risk of abuse, studies have found no evidence to support these assumptions. The paper calls for reducing reliance on opioids for chronic pain and improving clinician training on cultural competence and implicit biases.
This systematic review analyzed data from 38 studies on rates of problematic opioid use among chronic pain patients prescribed opioids. The key findings were:
1. Rates of problematic use varied widely across studies, from 1% to 81%.
2. When weighted averages were calculated, rates of misuse averaged between 21-29% and rates of addiction averaged between 8-12%.
3. Only one study directly reported rates of abuse.
4. Few differences emerged when analyzing rates based on study characteristics, though rates of addiction may be lower in studies where assessing prevalence was the primary aim.
5. Significant variability remains in the literature, but this review provides guidance on possible average rates of different types of problematic
A systematic review_on_the_use_of_psychosocial.4Paul Coelho, MD
This document summarizes a systematic review of 27 empirical studies on the use of psychosocial interventions in conjunction with medications for the treatment of opioid addiction. The most widely studied interventions were contingency management and cognitive behavioral therapy, primarily in the context of methadone treatment. The results generally support providing psychosocial interventions along with medications to improve outcomes like reducing opioid use and increasing treatment retention and completion rates, though benefits varied across studies. However, significant gaps remain in understanding the most effective combination and delivery of psychosocial treatments with different medications. More research is needed to optimize treatment of the opioid epidemic.
Fear of withdrawal perpetuates opioid use in CNP.Paul Coelho, MD
This document discusses a study that examined reasons for prescription opioid use among patients seeking treatment for opioid dependence. The study found that participants with chronic pain were more likely to report using opioids initially for pain relief, while avoiding withdrawal was the most common reason for current use among all participants. Participants with chronic pain rated coping with physical pain as a more important reason for use, and social or craving reasons as less important, compared to those without chronic pain. The results highlight the role of physical pain as a key reason for opioid use among patients with dependence who have chronic pain conditions.
This study investigated the relationship between pain catastrophizing and outcomes in 253 chronic pain patients prescribed opioids in primary care settings. Patients completed measures of pain catastrophizing, intensity, disability, side effects, and opioid misuse at baseline and 6-month follow up. The results showed that patients with high catastrophizing reported greater pain, disability, negative affect, side effects, and opioid misuse compared to low catastrophizing patients, both at baseline and over 6 months. Higher catastrophizing was associated with worse pain outcomes and increased risk of opioid misuse among chronic pain patients prescribed opioids in primary care.
FIRST DRAFT1FIRST DRAFT9First DraftErica K.docxAKHIL969626
FIRST DRAFT 1
FIRST DRAFT 9
First Draft
Erica K. Fernandez
Argosy University
Pain Management for Patients with Addiction Problems
Thesis Statement
The ability of clinicians to keep patients in check has proven to be a challenge, especially with concerns regarding the legitimacy and physical functions affecting overall pain management in patients with an addiction problem.
Background
The treatment modalities for chronic pain using COT in active drug users or those who are in remission present a significant challenge for clinicians who oversee the effectiveness of the intervention. Moreover, such notions are correlated to the concerns of patients experiencing a relapse to substance abuse during the duration of therapy since analgesics may obscure drug-seeking behaviours that are characteristic of addictive diseases. This results in poor treatment outcomes where patients are likely to be discharged prematurely from pain care treatment (Ballantyne & Mao, 2003). Additionally, there is the widespread misconception that chronic pain patients with an addiction problem often encounter health professionals who possess inadequate training in clinical guidelines that are related to comorbidities of chronic pain and related addiction issues. Moreover, there exists a dilemma for the treatment of abstinent and former heroin addicts as they are at a high risk of relapsing to addiction if they are exposed to opioid drugs. They also face the risk of relapsing if they are not accorded sufficient care. For people who are already on opioid medication such as methadone often experience challenges responding to pain relievers when they are hospitalized. In such as case, the fundamental principle of management denotes the prevention of withdrawals by initiating methadone for heroin users while providing additional analgesia as recommended while confirming whether the pain relief is satisfactory (Chou et al., 2009). Additionally, most physicians have developed a phobia of over prescribing narcotics as pain relievers. Perhaps this may be attributed to the fear of the legal repercussions that may ensue including the divergences in federal guidelines on matters about the use of narcotics as a pain reliever. Thus, it is the responsibility of the individual practitioner to offer pain management using opioids for legitimate standard and by the regulation of medical practice.
Objective
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the challenges that are faced by clinicians in pain treatment for patients with addiction problems. On the other hand, the study focuses on offering a counter-argument to the thesis by providing ideal solutions for pain management for patients with SUDs. Additionally, the research intends to highlight the complex interconnection that exists between pain management and addiction to opioids.
Supporting Points
For clinicians, the hardest challenge is perhaps knowing the right way to handle patients who require pain medication, ...
5069 -Module 4 The Value of Information and CostsHomework .docxalinainglis
5069 -Module 4 The Value of Information and Costs
Homework 4
Class,
Do a search on the internet and find a company that does this well reliability measures, and write up a page telling me what this company does and why it does well with this area.
Running head: PAIN MANAGEMENT AND ADDICTION 1
PAIN MANAGEMENT AND ADDICTION 7
Pain Management and Addiction
Name
Institution
Pain Management for Patients with Addiction Problems
Thesis Statement
The ability of clinicians to keep patients in check has proven to be a challenge, especially with concerns regarding the legitimacy and physical functions affecting overall pain management in patients with an addiction problem.
Background
The treatment modalities for chronic pain using COT in active drug users or those who are in remission presents a significant challenge for clinicians who oversee the effectiveness of the intervention. Moreover, such notions are correlated to the concerns of patients experiencing a relapse to substance abuse during the duration of therapy since analgesics may obscure drug seeking behaviors that are characteristic of addictive diseases. This results in poor treatment outcomes where patients are likely to be discharged prematurely from pain care treatment. Additionally, there is the widespread misconception that chronic pain patients with an addiction problem often encounter health professionals who possess inadequate training in clinical guidelines that are related to comorbidities of chronic pain and related addiction issues. Moreover, there exists a dilemma for the treatment of abstinent and former heroin addicts as they are at a high risk of relapsing to addiction if they are exposed to opioid drugs. They also face the risk of relapsing if they are not accorded sufficient care. For people who are already on opioid medication such as methadone often experience challenges responding to pain relievers when they are hospitalized. In such as case, the fundamental principle of management denotes the prevention of withdrawals by initiating methadone for heroin users while providing additional analgesia as recommended while confirming whether the pain relief is satisfactory. Additionally, most physicians have developed a phobia of overprescription of narcotics as pain relievers. Perhaps this may be attributed to the fear of the legal repercussions that may ensue including the divergences in federal guidelines on matters about use of narcotics as a pain reliever. Thus, it is the responsibility of the individual practitioner to offer pain management using opioids for legitimate standard and by the regulation of medical practice.
Objective
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the challenges that are faced by clinicians in pain treatment for patients with addiction problems. On the other hand, the study focuses on offering a counter argument to the thesis by providing ideal solutions for pain management for patients with SUDs. Additionally, the rese.
This study compared chronic pain patients whose symptoms were considered medically unexplained (cases) to those whose symptoms had clear medical explanations (controls). The key findings were:
1. Medically unexplained symptoms were associated with higher rates of psychiatric morbidity, including a 3.4 times higher odds of any psychiatric diagnosis.
2. Cases reported more potential iatrogenic factors like over-investigation and over-treatment from healthcare providers compared to controls.
3. There were no significant differences between cases and controls in rates of medication abuse or dependence.
This paper examines the relationship between socioeconomic factors and prescription drug abuse. It reviews 7 studies that found higher rates of opioid misuse among low-income populations, including Medicaid patients and those with mental health or substance abuse disorders. While doctors often perceive younger and non-white patients to be at higher risk of abuse, studies have found no evidence to support these assumptions. The paper calls for reducing reliance on opioids for chronic pain and improving clinician training on cultural competence and implicit biases.
This systematic review analyzed data from 38 studies on rates of problematic opioid use among chronic pain patients prescribed opioids. The key findings were:
1. Rates of problematic use varied widely across studies, from 1% to 81%.
2. When weighted averages were calculated, rates of misuse averaged between 21-29% and rates of addiction averaged between 8-12%.
3. Only one study directly reported rates of abuse.
4. Few differences emerged when analyzing rates based on study characteristics, though rates of addiction may be lower in studies where assessing prevalence was the primary aim.
5. Significant variability remains in the literature, but this review provides guidance on possible average rates of different types of problematic
A systematic review_on_the_use_of_psychosocial.4Paul Coelho, MD
This document summarizes a systematic review of 27 empirical studies on the use of psychosocial interventions in conjunction with medications for the treatment of opioid addiction. The most widely studied interventions were contingency management and cognitive behavioral therapy, primarily in the context of methadone treatment. The results generally support providing psychosocial interventions along with medications to improve outcomes like reducing opioid use and increasing treatment retention and completion rates, though benefits varied across studies. However, significant gaps remain in understanding the most effective combination and delivery of psychosocial treatments with different medications. More research is needed to optimize treatment of the opioid epidemic.
1) The study examined the association between spousal or significant other solicitous responses and opioid dose in 466 patients with chronic pain. 2) It found that higher scores on a scale measuring solicitous responses, such as asking about pain symptoms, were associated with higher daily morphine equivalent doses. 3) This association remained even after adjusting for other factors like age, sex, depression and pain severity. The findings suggest solicitous responses may influence opioid dose among chronic pain patients.
1) This randomized clinical trial compared opioid vs nonopioid medication therapy over 12 months for patients with chronic back, hip, or knee pain.
2) It found no significant difference in pain-related function between the two groups, but pain intensity was significantly better in the nonopioid group. Adverse effects were significantly more common in the opioid group.
3) The study concludes that opioid therapy was not superior to nonopioid medications for improving pain-related function over 12 months, and the results do not support initiating opioids for moderate to severe chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Vowles et al (2015) opioid misuse, abuse, and addictionPaul Coelho, MD
This systematic review analyzed 38 studies on rates of problematic opioid use among chronic pain patients. The review sought to provide precise prevalence estimates for misuse, abuse, and addiction by applying explicit definitions and weighting studies by sample size and quality. Rates of misuse averaged between 21-29%, while rates of addiction averaged between 8-12%. Only one study reported rates of abuse. Significant variability remained between studies. Higher quality studies and those where prevalence was a primary objective tended to report lower addiction rates. The review provides guidance on possible average rates but also indicates need for further clarification.
- 49% of chronic pain patients taking opioids reported severe pain (≥7/10).
- Patients reporting higher pain were more likely to have characteristics associated with centralized pain processing, including higher fibromyalgia survey scores, more neuropathic pain symptoms, and higher depression levels.
- While only 3.2% were diagnosed with fibromyalgia by their doctor, 40.8% met criteria for fibromyalgia based on a validated survey questionnaire. This suggests centralized pain characteristics are underrecognized.
This study examined the heritability of pain catastrophizing using a twin study design. 400 twins completed measures of pain catastrophizing and underwent a cold pressor task experiment. Results showed pain catastrophizing was 37% heritable, with the remaining 63% due to unique environmental factors. The association between catastrophizing and increased pain response during the cold pressor task was not attributable to shared genetics or environment, suggesting a direct relationship between catastrophizing and experimental pain outcomes. This was the first study to examine the genetic contributions to catastrophizing and its relationship to experimental pain responses.
The paper lists the correct method of diagnosing chronic pain, and matching the proper medication to tissue damage without the use of narcotics or opioids.
This study examined health insurance claims data from over 10 million patients who were prescribed opioids to evaluate how opioid receipt differed based on preexisting psychiatric conditions and medications. The study found that patients with a variety of psychiatric conditions and those prescribed various psychoactive medications were more likely to receive opioids, particularly long-term opioid therapy. The increased risk for long-term opioid therapy ranged from 1.5 times higher for those previously prescribed ADHD medications, to over 8 times higher for those with prior opioid use disorder diagnoses. The results provide evidence that commercially insured patients with psychiatric conditions receive opioids more than those without such conditions.
- Veterans with PTSD commonly use marijuana to help manage symptoms like insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Studies show marijuana use is associated with reduced severity of PTSD symptoms and improved sleep and mood.
- The endocannabinoid system, including the CB1 receptor in the hippocampus and amygdala, may explain why marijuana provides relief from PTSD symptoms. However, more research is still needed on the long term effects and potential risks of marijuana use for treating PTSD.
- While preliminary evidence supports exploring marijuana as a treatment for PTSD, more extensive clinical trials are required before it can be recommended or prescribed as a standard treatment option. Research barriers around federal laws and stigma need to be addressed first.
The role of illness perceptions and medicine beliefs in adherence to chronic ...epicyclops
Presentation given by Dr Leanne Ramsay & Dr Martin Dunbar to the West of Scotland Pain Group on 7th October 2008 at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow.
This document contains summaries of several research papers on topics related to chronic pain, suicide risk, and bipolar disorder:
1) One study found that tapering opioid doses for chronic pain patients was associated with increased risks of overdose and mental health crisis compared to patients who did not taper. Higher tapering speeds were linked to even greater risks.
2) Another study observed chronic pain patients undergoing opioid tapering or transition to buprenorphine treatment. Higher initial opioid doses predicted needing buprenorphine, and benzodiazepine use predicted dropout. Pain levels varied after treatment.
3) Research on combat veterans found that those exposed to combat had higher rates of PTSD, suicide attempts, strokes and chronic pain
This study analyzed results from over 900,000 urine drug tests conducted between 2006-2009 on patients prescribed chronic opioids. The results showed:
- 11% tested positive for illicit drugs
- 29% tested positive for non-prescribed medications
- 38% did not detect the prescribed medication
- 15% had lower than expected levels of the prescribed medication
- 27% had higher than expected levels of the prescribed medication
These high rates of potential issues like non-compliance, abuse or diversion demonstrate the importance of periodic urine drug screening for patients on long-term opioid therapy to identify problems and ensure appropriate use of medications.
Chu et al. (2015)
The study reviewed 14 clinical studies that used quantitative sensory testing to detect hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients on long-term opioids. Most sensory modalities tested, including cold, heat, pressure, electrical, ischemic, and injection pain, failed to demonstrate hypersensitivity to test stimuli. Heat pain sensitivity showed some promising results in detecting hyperalgesia, but none of the measures reviewed met the criteria as a definitive standard. Additional studies with improved designs are needed.
This document summarizes the misconceptions around opioid use and addiction. It discusses how opioids work in the brain to produce both analgesia and euphoria through activation of mu-opioid receptors. Repeated use leads to tolerance and physical dependence, but addiction only occurs in a small percentage of patients and involves distinct molecular mechanisms. Common misconceptions include equating addiction, tolerance and physical dependence. The document advocates for strategies to minimize risks of diversion and abuse through abuse-deterrent formulations.
Intensity of chronic pain — the wrong metric Paul Coelho, MD
The document discusses how pain intensity is an imperfect metric for evaluating chronic pain treatment outcomes. While pain intensity was widely used as the goal of acute and end-of-life pain treatment, it fails as a measure for chronic pain, which has different causes and meanings. For chronic pain patients, factors like suffering, distress, disability, and quality of life may be better indicators of treatment success than pain intensity alone. The document advocates for moving beyond a focus solely on pain intensity and adopting multimodal treatments and a biopsychosocial approach that considers the complex nature of chronic pain.
Dual diagnosis occurs when a person has both a substance abuse disorder and a mental health disorder. Treating both conditions is necessary for recovery, which typically involves detoxification followed by rehabilitation for substance abuse and treatment for the mental health disorder. Over half of those with substance abuse or dependence have also experienced a mental health disorder at some point. Integrated treatment programs that address substance abuse, psychiatric symptoms, and other issues like housing, employment, legal concerns, and family/medical problems are recommended for those with dual diagnoses.
The document discusses pain and addiction as co-morbid disease states. It provides epidemiological data on the prescription drug abuse epidemic, including increased rates of opioid abuse and overdose deaths. It also examines the role of physicians in fueling non-medical prescription drug use through improper prescribing practices or a lack of training in identifying addiction.
The association between a history of lifetime traumatic events and pain sever...Paul Coelho, MD
This study examined the associations between a history of lifetime abuse and affective distress, fibromyalgia symptoms, pain severity, interference, and physical functioning in 3,081 chronic pain patients. The study found that those with a history of abuse had greater depression, anxiety, worse physical functioning, greater pain severity, worse pain interference, higher catastrophizing, and higher scores on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey criteria. Mediation models showed that fibromyalgia survey scores and affective distress independently mediated the relationship between abuse history and pain severity and physical functioning. The findings support a biopsychosocial model where affective distress and fibromyalgia symptoms interact to play roles in how abuse relates to increased pain morbidity.
Substance abuse has significant negative impacts on mental health. It can lead to the development of mental health conditions like depression and anxiety. People who abuse substances often have co-occurring mental illnesses. Treating both substance abuse and mental health issues simultaneously is challenging and integrated treatment approaches are needed. Substance abuse disorders are also linked to poorer psychosocial functioning and problems with relationships, work, and daily life. Women may be particularly vulnerable as substance abuse can stem from attempts to self-medicate physical or mental health conditions.
C. Give the patient Tylenol 650mg P.O as ordered and assist the patient with guided imagery.
This patient's pain level is relatively low at a 2/10 and is being well managed with scheduled Tylenol. Guided imagery could help further reduce the patient's perception of pain without unnecessary opioid exposure. Options A, B, and D would likely provide more pain relief than is needed and increase risks of opioid dependence, misuse or overdose.
Prescription opioid use among adults with mental health disorders in the US.Paul Coelho, MD
This study analyzed nationally representative health survey data to examine prescription opioid use among US adults with mental health disorders. The key findings were:
1) An estimated 18.7% of the 38.6 million American adults with mental health disorders use prescription opioids, accounting for 51.4% of the total opioid prescriptions distributed in the US each year.
2) Adults with mental health disorders were over 3 times more likely to use opioids compared to adults without mental health disorders.
3) Having a mental health disorder was associated with a more than 2 times greater odds of prescription opioid use after adjusting for other health factors.
Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for .docxjames891
Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for the final project in this course. For this milestone, you will complete Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final project.
Milestone Two should incorporate your work from:
Module Four Small Group Discussion: Five Communication Strategy Recommendations
Module Four Discussion: ZOPA and BATNA for Alice Jones
Module Five Discussion: Proxemics
Module Five Assignment: Questions for the Negotiating Session
In your submission, you should recommend options that address both parties' distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and tacit communication prompts that could be used in the negotiation meeting by Sharon Slade.
Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be aware of) and that Alice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our readings on the Johari window that address this issue. Be sure to address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating positions that you will recommend to Sharon Slade. Doing this will increase the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win-win negotiation outcome.
A ZOPA and BATNA for Alice
Unacceptable options for Alice in her in a Severance Agreement if fired
If Alice was dismissed, any compensation below what her colleagues have got in the past for comparable positions scenarios, particularly for similar lengths of service, would've been inappropriate. For instance, she has worked for the company for more than ten years, thus her pay cut should contain severance payout compensation. If Netflix has previously paid fourteen days of compensation for each full year of employment, Alice has worked for the company for ten years which means she is supposed to get five years of salary as part of her severance package. Just like her former dismisses coworkers, Alice must also be entitled to the same health and related benefits. According to Fischer (n.d.), Netflix's organizational culture follows the policy of letting go of personnel who are no longer needed.
Options that Alice offer to keep her position at Netflix
The performance improvement plan should be monitored by Alice and the direct manager if Sharon signs the agreement or agrees on the monitoring as a way of tracking development. Goal setting as well as timelines for certain habits and tasks to be completed are examples of what needs monitoring. Alice might also agree to take away her extra pecuniary perks like bonuses, royalties, and deferred compensation. Alice may not have been informed of her underperformance, particularly if the new leadership didn't to offer such information. Sharon may be more ready to support Alice to perform as a means of enhancing her efficiency if the monetary risk of having her leave the company is reduced.
Alice’s Best Alternative for a Negotiated Agreement
The objectives of Sharon Slade and the company (Netflix) include re.
Submit to Assignment Folder.Purpose The purpose of this.docxjames891
Submit to Assignment Folder.
Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to reflect on, analyze and apply tort law, product liability law, agency and contract law, and their potential risks and liabilities in a business. The project requires you to identify and analyze legal issues and to make recommendations.
You will also develop skills in critical thinking to create an in-depth comprehensive analysis.
The project relates to the concepts covered in weeks 1-7. You should refer to assigned materials in earlier weeks of the course, including Instructor Notes.
This project relates to the following course outcomes:
· recommend appropriate actions in the business environment based on an understanding of sources of law, substantive legal concepts, legal process and procedure, and available remedies
· analyze contractual rights, obligations, liabilities, and remedies in the business environment
· analyze tort rights, obligations, liabilities, and remedies in the business environment
Background:
The GC owners are meeting with TLG in final consultations before GC opens business operations. The purpose of these final meetings is to identify the:
· areas of business law presenting the greatest potential risk and liabilities for GC; and
· areas of business operations vulnerable to potential risks and liabilities for which GC should seek legal counsel.
Winnie and Ralph have asked you to provide a report that presents your reflections and recommendations based on your research and analysis during the past seven weeks of TLG’s consultation with the GC owners.
Instructions
The report will have two (2) parts.
Part I. Risks and Liabilities
A. Analyze and discuss two (2) areas of business law that present the greatest potential risks and liabilities for the GC business, from among these areas:
· Negligence related to any business operations
· Negligence related specifically to premises liability
· Strict product liability related to the use of EPI products for GC services
· Strict product liability related specifically to the resale of EPI products
· Contracts with employees
· Contracts for the sale of goods with clients
· Agency law and contracts with any GC agents
For
EACH
of the two (2) areas of the law selected from the above list, you must:
(1). Provide a background explanation of the area of law, e.g., negligence, contracts for the sale of goods, etc. (be detailed and specific so any reader can understand the meaning of the specific area of law)
(2). Analyze and explain the specific potential risks and liabilities presented by the area of law and
why and how
each area of law creates vulnerability for GC
(3). Provide a specific example of
why and how
the potential risks and liabilities could arise for each area of law for the GC business
Minimum of 3 paragraphs for
EACH
of the two areas of risks and liabilities you choose to discuss (total of 6 paragraphs, minimum)
Citations required
Part II. Legal Counsel
.
More Related Content
Similar to SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, VOL. , NO. , –http.docx
1) The study examined the association between spousal or significant other solicitous responses and opioid dose in 466 patients with chronic pain. 2) It found that higher scores on a scale measuring solicitous responses, such as asking about pain symptoms, were associated with higher daily morphine equivalent doses. 3) This association remained even after adjusting for other factors like age, sex, depression and pain severity. The findings suggest solicitous responses may influence opioid dose among chronic pain patients.
1) This randomized clinical trial compared opioid vs nonopioid medication therapy over 12 months for patients with chronic back, hip, or knee pain.
2) It found no significant difference in pain-related function between the two groups, but pain intensity was significantly better in the nonopioid group. Adverse effects were significantly more common in the opioid group.
3) The study concludes that opioid therapy was not superior to nonopioid medications for improving pain-related function over 12 months, and the results do not support initiating opioids for moderate to severe chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Vowles et al (2015) opioid misuse, abuse, and addictionPaul Coelho, MD
This systematic review analyzed 38 studies on rates of problematic opioid use among chronic pain patients. The review sought to provide precise prevalence estimates for misuse, abuse, and addiction by applying explicit definitions and weighting studies by sample size and quality. Rates of misuse averaged between 21-29%, while rates of addiction averaged between 8-12%. Only one study reported rates of abuse. Significant variability remained between studies. Higher quality studies and those where prevalence was a primary objective tended to report lower addiction rates. The review provides guidance on possible average rates but also indicates need for further clarification.
- 49% of chronic pain patients taking opioids reported severe pain (≥7/10).
- Patients reporting higher pain were more likely to have characteristics associated with centralized pain processing, including higher fibromyalgia survey scores, more neuropathic pain symptoms, and higher depression levels.
- While only 3.2% were diagnosed with fibromyalgia by their doctor, 40.8% met criteria for fibromyalgia based on a validated survey questionnaire. This suggests centralized pain characteristics are underrecognized.
This study examined the heritability of pain catastrophizing using a twin study design. 400 twins completed measures of pain catastrophizing and underwent a cold pressor task experiment. Results showed pain catastrophizing was 37% heritable, with the remaining 63% due to unique environmental factors. The association between catastrophizing and increased pain response during the cold pressor task was not attributable to shared genetics or environment, suggesting a direct relationship between catastrophizing and experimental pain outcomes. This was the first study to examine the genetic contributions to catastrophizing and its relationship to experimental pain responses.
The paper lists the correct method of diagnosing chronic pain, and matching the proper medication to tissue damage without the use of narcotics or opioids.
This study examined health insurance claims data from over 10 million patients who were prescribed opioids to evaluate how opioid receipt differed based on preexisting psychiatric conditions and medications. The study found that patients with a variety of psychiatric conditions and those prescribed various psychoactive medications were more likely to receive opioids, particularly long-term opioid therapy. The increased risk for long-term opioid therapy ranged from 1.5 times higher for those previously prescribed ADHD medications, to over 8 times higher for those with prior opioid use disorder diagnoses. The results provide evidence that commercially insured patients with psychiatric conditions receive opioids more than those without such conditions.
- Veterans with PTSD commonly use marijuana to help manage symptoms like insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Studies show marijuana use is associated with reduced severity of PTSD symptoms and improved sleep and mood.
- The endocannabinoid system, including the CB1 receptor in the hippocampus and amygdala, may explain why marijuana provides relief from PTSD symptoms. However, more research is still needed on the long term effects and potential risks of marijuana use for treating PTSD.
- While preliminary evidence supports exploring marijuana as a treatment for PTSD, more extensive clinical trials are required before it can be recommended or prescribed as a standard treatment option. Research barriers around federal laws and stigma need to be addressed first.
The role of illness perceptions and medicine beliefs in adherence to chronic ...epicyclops
Presentation given by Dr Leanne Ramsay & Dr Martin Dunbar to the West of Scotland Pain Group on 7th October 2008 at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow.
This document contains summaries of several research papers on topics related to chronic pain, suicide risk, and bipolar disorder:
1) One study found that tapering opioid doses for chronic pain patients was associated with increased risks of overdose and mental health crisis compared to patients who did not taper. Higher tapering speeds were linked to even greater risks.
2) Another study observed chronic pain patients undergoing opioid tapering or transition to buprenorphine treatment. Higher initial opioid doses predicted needing buprenorphine, and benzodiazepine use predicted dropout. Pain levels varied after treatment.
3) Research on combat veterans found that those exposed to combat had higher rates of PTSD, suicide attempts, strokes and chronic pain
This study analyzed results from over 900,000 urine drug tests conducted between 2006-2009 on patients prescribed chronic opioids. The results showed:
- 11% tested positive for illicit drugs
- 29% tested positive for non-prescribed medications
- 38% did not detect the prescribed medication
- 15% had lower than expected levels of the prescribed medication
- 27% had higher than expected levels of the prescribed medication
These high rates of potential issues like non-compliance, abuse or diversion demonstrate the importance of periodic urine drug screening for patients on long-term opioid therapy to identify problems and ensure appropriate use of medications.
Chu et al. (2015)
The study reviewed 14 clinical studies that used quantitative sensory testing to detect hyperalgesia in chronic pain patients on long-term opioids. Most sensory modalities tested, including cold, heat, pressure, electrical, ischemic, and injection pain, failed to demonstrate hypersensitivity to test stimuli. Heat pain sensitivity showed some promising results in detecting hyperalgesia, but none of the measures reviewed met the criteria as a definitive standard. Additional studies with improved designs are needed.
This document summarizes the misconceptions around opioid use and addiction. It discusses how opioids work in the brain to produce both analgesia and euphoria through activation of mu-opioid receptors. Repeated use leads to tolerance and physical dependence, but addiction only occurs in a small percentage of patients and involves distinct molecular mechanisms. Common misconceptions include equating addiction, tolerance and physical dependence. The document advocates for strategies to minimize risks of diversion and abuse through abuse-deterrent formulations.
Intensity of chronic pain — the wrong metric Paul Coelho, MD
The document discusses how pain intensity is an imperfect metric for evaluating chronic pain treatment outcomes. While pain intensity was widely used as the goal of acute and end-of-life pain treatment, it fails as a measure for chronic pain, which has different causes and meanings. For chronic pain patients, factors like suffering, distress, disability, and quality of life may be better indicators of treatment success than pain intensity alone. The document advocates for moving beyond a focus solely on pain intensity and adopting multimodal treatments and a biopsychosocial approach that considers the complex nature of chronic pain.
Dual diagnosis occurs when a person has both a substance abuse disorder and a mental health disorder. Treating both conditions is necessary for recovery, which typically involves detoxification followed by rehabilitation for substance abuse and treatment for the mental health disorder. Over half of those with substance abuse or dependence have also experienced a mental health disorder at some point. Integrated treatment programs that address substance abuse, psychiatric symptoms, and other issues like housing, employment, legal concerns, and family/medical problems are recommended for those with dual diagnoses.
The document discusses pain and addiction as co-morbid disease states. It provides epidemiological data on the prescription drug abuse epidemic, including increased rates of opioid abuse and overdose deaths. It also examines the role of physicians in fueling non-medical prescription drug use through improper prescribing practices or a lack of training in identifying addiction.
The association between a history of lifetime traumatic events and pain sever...Paul Coelho, MD
This study examined the associations between a history of lifetime abuse and affective distress, fibromyalgia symptoms, pain severity, interference, and physical functioning in 3,081 chronic pain patients. The study found that those with a history of abuse had greater depression, anxiety, worse physical functioning, greater pain severity, worse pain interference, higher catastrophizing, and higher scores on the 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey criteria. Mediation models showed that fibromyalgia survey scores and affective distress independently mediated the relationship between abuse history and pain severity and physical functioning. The findings support a biopsychosocial model where affective distress and fibromyalgia symptoms interact to play roles in how abuse relates to increased pain morbidity.
Substance abuse has significant negative impacts on mental health. It can lead to the development of mental health conditions like depression and anxiety. People who abuse substances often have co-occurring mental illnesses. Treating both substance abuse and mental health issues simultaneously is challenging and integrated treatment approaches are needed. Substance abuse disorders are also linked to poorer psychosocial functioning and problems with relationships, work, and daily life. Women may be particularly vulnerable as substance abuse can stem from attempts to self-medicate physical or mental health conditions.
C. Give the patient Tylenol 650mg P.O as ordered and assist the patient with guided imagery.
This patient's pain level is relatively low at a 2/10 and is being well managed with scheduled Tylenol. Guided imagery could help further reduce the patient's perception of pain without unnecessary opioid exposure. Options A, B, and D would likely provide more pain relief than is needed and increase risks of opioid dependence, misuse or overdose.
Prescription opioid use among adults with mental health disorders in the US.Paul Coelho, MD
This study analyzed nationally representative health survey data to examine prescription opioid use among US adults with mental health disorders. The key findings were:
1) An estimated 18.7% of the 38.6 million American adults with mental health disorders use prescription opioids, accounting for 51.4% of the total opioid prescriptions distributed in the US each year.
2) Adults with mental health disorders were over 3 times more likely to use opioids compared to adults without mental health disorders.
3) Having a mental health disorder was associated with a more than 2 times greater odds of prescription opioid use after adjusting for other health factors.
Similar to SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, VOL. , NO. , –http.docx (20)
Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for .docxjames891
Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for the final project in this course. For this milestone, you will complete Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final project.
Milestone Two should incorporate your work from:
Module Four Small Group Discussion: Five Communication Strategy Recommendations
Module Four Discussion: ZOPA and BATNA for Alice Jones
Module Five Discussion: Proxemics
Module Five Assignment: Questions for the Negotiating Session
In your submission, you should recommend options that address both parties' distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and tacit communication prompts that could be used in the negotiation meeting by Sharon Slade.
Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be aware of) and that Alice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our readings on the Johari window that address this issue. Be sure to address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating positions that you will recommend to Sharon Slade. Doing this will increase the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win-win negotiation outcome.
A ZOPA and BATNA for Alice
Unacceptable options for Alice in her in a Severance Agreement if fired
If Alice was dismissed, any compensation below what her colleagues have got in the past for comparable positions scenarios, particularly for similar lengths of service, would've been inappropriate. For instance, she has worked for the company for more than ten years, thus her pay cut should contain severance payout compensation. If Netflix has previously paid fourteen days of compensation for each full year of employment, Alice has worked for the company for ten years which means she is supposed to get five years of salary as part of her severance package. Just like her former dismisses coworkers, Alice must also be entitled to the same health and related benefits. According to Fischer (n.d.), Netflix's organizational culture follows the policy of letting go of personnel who are no longer needed.
Options that Alice offer to keep her position at Netflix
The performance improvement plan should be monitored by Alice and the direct manager if Sharon signs the agreement or agrees on the monitoring as a way of tracking development. Goal setting as well as timelines for certain habits and tasks to be completed are examples of what needs monitoring. Alice might also agree to take away her extra pecuniary perks like bonuses, royalties, and deferred compensation. Alice may not have been informed of her underperformance, particularly if the new leadership didn't to offer such information. Sharon may be more ready to support Alice to perform as a means of enhancing her efficiency if the monetary risk of having her leave the company is reduced.
Alice’s Best Alternative for a Negotiated Agreement
The objectives of Sharon Slade and the company (Netflix) include re.
Submit to Assignment Folder.Purpose The purpose of this.docxjames891
Submit to Assignment Folder.
Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to reflect on, analyze and apply tort law, product liability law, agency and contract law, and their potential risks and liabilities in a business. The project requires you to identify and analyze legal issues and to make recommendations.
You will also develop skills in critical thinking to create an in-depth comprehensive analysis.
The project relates to the concepts covered in weeks 1-7. You should refer to assigned materials in earlier weeks of the course, including Instructor Notes.
This project relates to the following course outcomes:
· recommend appropriate actions in the business environment based on an understanding of sources of law, substantive legal concepts, legal process and procedure, and available remedies
· analyze contractual rights, obligations, liabilities, and remedies in the business environment
· analyze tort rights, obligations, liabilities, and remedies in the business environment
Background:
The GC owners are meeting with TLG in final consultations before GC opens business operations. The purpose of these final meetings is to identify the:
· areas of business law presenting the greatest potential risk and liabilities for GC; and
· areas of business operations vulnerable to potential risks and liabilities for which GC should seek legal counsel.
Winnie and Ralph have asked you to provide a report that presents your reflections and recommendations based on your research and analysis during the past seven weeks of TLG’s consultation with the GC owners.
Instructions
The report will have two (2) parts.
Part I. Risks and Liabilities
A. Analyze and discuss two (2) areas of business law that present the greatest potential risks and liabilities for the GC business, from among these areas:
· Negligence related to any business operations
· Negligence related specifically to premises liability
· Strict product liability related to the use of EPI products for GC services
· Strict product liability related specifically to the resale of EPI products
· Contracts with employees
· Contracts for the sale of goods with clients
· Agency law and contracts with any GC agents
For
EACH
of the two (2) areas of the law selected from the above list, you must:
(1). Provide a background explanation of the area of law, e.g., negligence, contracts for the sale of goods, etc. (be detailed and specific so any reader can understand the meaning of the specific area of law)
(2). Analyze and explain the specific potential risks and liabilities presented by the area of law and
why and how
each area of law creates vulnerability for GC
(3). Provide a specific example of
why and how
the potential risks and liabilities could arise for each area of law for the GC business
Minimum of 3 paragraphs for
EACH
of the two areas of risks and liabilities you choose to discuss (total of 6 paragraphs, minimum)
Citations required
Part II. Legal Counsel
.
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT 2.1Assignment 2.1 Liberty Challenged in Ninet.docxjames891
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT 2.1
Assignment 2.1: Liberty Challenged in Nineteenth Century America Thesis and Outline
Due Week 7 and worth 50 points
America became a free independent nation. With the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1783, the former mother country, England, recognized that its children, the colonies, were now on their own. A constitutional republic was birthed, and thus the challenges began. Slavery, the “Peculiar Institution,” was a monumental issue facing the country. Would it die or would it survive and possibly take a nation divided with it? This sectionalism followed Americans up into the Civil War. Dissect this crisis by addressing parts I and II below.
For the next part of this assignment you will create an outline of the main points you want to address in this paper. This will serve as the basis for your Assignment 2.2 Final Draft. (Note: Please use the Purdue Owl website to assist you with this assignment; this website can be accessed at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/55/.)
Part 1:
1. Write a thesis statement that is one to two (1-2) sentences long in which you:
a. State your thesis on the significance of this slavery issue, as exemplified in your research. Justify your response.
For the first part of this assignment you will create a thesis statement. A thesis statement is usually a single sentence somewhere in your first paragraph that presents your main idea to the reader. The body of the essay organizes the material you gather and present in support of your main idea. Keep in mind that a thesis is an interpretation of a question or subject, not the subject itself. (Note: Please consult the Purdue OWL website with tips on how to construct a proper thesis; the website can be found at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/545/01/.)
Part 2:
For the next part of this assignment you will create an outline of the main points you want to address in this paper. This will serve as the basis for your Assignment 2.2 Final Draft. (Note: Please use the Purdue Owl website to assist you with this assignment; this website can be accessed at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/55/.)2. Write a one to two (1-2) page outline in which you:
a. Describe two (2) outcomes of the 3/5ths Compromise, Missouri Compromise of 1820, Compromise of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dred Scott Decision. Note: Be sure to provide two (2) outcomes for each legislation.
b. Suggest three (3) reasons why slavery was and is incompatible with our political and economic system.
c. List three to five (3-5) driving forces that led to the Civil War.
d. Use at least three (3) academic references besides or in addition to the textbook. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
· This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SW.
Submit Milestone Three. This submission includes the methods, educat.docxjames891
This document provides instructions for Milestone Three of an assignment, which requires submitting methods, education, and solutions identified along with an conclusion discussing ethical perspectives, balancing positive and negative impacts, and personal impact. Sources must be cited in APA format within the text and references, though speaker notes are not required for Milestone Three.
Submit an outline of your Signature Assignment research paper. .docxjames891
This document provides instructions for submitting an outline for a signature assignment research paper. The outline must include an introduction, body, and conclusion section in outline format. The body should include topic sentences for each section and paragraph transitions to tie major points together, following current APA style guidelines as appropriate.
Submit the Marketing Mix section of the Final Marketing Plan (Sectio.docxjames891
Submit the Marketing Mix section of the Final Marketing Plan (Section IV A-F of the Marketing Plan Outline). The analysis should be completed on the same company chosen from Weeks 1, 2, and 3.
Marketing Mix
A. Product
B. Pricing
C. Promotion
1. Advertising
2. Promotion
3. Direct Marketing
4. Public Relations
5. Social Media
D. Place
E. Service
F. International Markets
G. Implementation Schedule.
The Final Marketing Plan Section IV: Marketing Mix paper:
Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)
.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
.
Submit Memo to the President.Content and General Guidelines.docxjames891
Submit Memo to the President.
Content and General Guidelines
This assignment is based on a research paper structure. It examines topics that deal with issues around
international justice
.
Students should use at
least 5
scholarly sources (Links to an external site.)
to complete their work. By engaging in and using investigative research tools, students will connect scholarly texts and design a research question and a hypothesis for the paper.
Students are encouraged to use various
concepts and theories of international studies
to complete this assignment.
Formatting
It should be 7-10 pages in length
Number each page
APA Style Citations
(for guidelines on the format see
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ (Links to an external site.)
)
Paper must have title
Reference/Bibliography Page
Must use at least five (5) peer-reviewed style texts that are not included in the course syllabus
Course texts and other popular press materials can be used as additional not supplemental materials
Structure
The paper should consist of three sections:
Executive Summary
(1-2 pages) with:
Problem statement, i.e. a summary and context of the issue that will be discussed
Research question, i.e. a phrase that captures the issue at hand in question form
Hypothesis, i.e. a recommendation on how to best response to the question
Memo
(5-7 pages) with:
Literature review, i.e. a discussion on the selected scholarly sources
Methods, i.e. brief description on the research design of the memo
Findings and discussion, i.e. facts that you analyze to support your suggested recommendation
Conclusion
(about 1 page) including:
A summary of your policy recommendation to the president
The potential impact on other areas (topical and geographic)
.
Submit an individual essay, addressing the question in a critical .docxjames891
Submit an individual essay, addressing the question in a critical manner, accompanied by appropriate academic material.
Question:
‘Although women have made considerable inroads in the workplace ... as a result of equity programs ..., rising education levels …, and progressive work/life policies ..., they continue to experience the ‘glass ceiling’ with respect to advancing into management ranks’ (Ng and Sears, 2017:133). Critically discuss.
This coursework will count for 50% of your total mark for this course.
1. Do note that no assistance is given 48 hours prior to submission.
2. All essays are submitted online only, no later than midnight, Dubai time.
FOR THIS ESSAY
You should make sure you include the following sections in your work.
1. Title page – must contain course information, title of assignment, registration number, date of submission and degree course
2. References–use the Harvard system.
3. Statement of Acknowledgement – You must provide a brief statement of acknowledgement at the end of the essay, which lists all help received in undertaking the assignment, and a statement that you are aware of university policy and regulations regarding plagiarism, copying and collusion. For more information on this please see the School of Management UG Handbook, Plagiarism.
Format and Submission
This coursework is only an electronic submission. No printed copy is required.
Based on the guidelines below, your essay must be submitted on or before the deadline, on vision through turn-it-in (make sure to submit your final version of the essay under ‘final submission’ option under your subject).
The essay should be an individually prepared piece of work. The essay must be typed on A4 paper and double-spaced. It should be a maximum of 2500 words (excluding references) in length and all sources should be appropriately referenced, both in the body of the text and in a detailed reference list at the end.
Failure to submit this work will mean an automatic deduction from your final mark as per the school policy. Please consult your Student Handbook for information on Late Submission of Coursework and penalty resulting from late submission.
assessment criteria
The following general criteria will be used to assess your work:
1. Structure – This means how the essay has been organised to present a logical, coherent answer to the questions. A clear logical format with linked points and arguments is expected. A brief introduction is required outlining how the aim/objective of the essay and the way the arguments are presented. Identification of the objective(s) and completeness of the answer. Objectives should be related to the chosen topic area and should be clearly stated in the essay. A conclusion is required that summarises the key points and arguments and relate back to the original objectives of the essay.
2. Background material – evidence of the background research drawing from literature sources. Should include enough descriptive conten.
Submit Final Project.Your course objective states consideration.docxjames891
Students must complete and submit a final hands-on science project by October 11th, 2019 using the scientific inquiry process. The project should be at least 2 pages, double-spaced, and include an introduction with the project's purpose, a background section with relevant scientific terms and definitions, procedures and data, results and conclusions sections, references, and pictures or diagrams. Sample project choices are provided but students can also use their own project ideas. The project will be submitted as a word document instead of a video.
Submit an outline for your research paper. The outline should make c.docxjames891
Submit an outline for your research paper. The outline should make clear how you are going to break down and organize your essay, what the purpose of each paragraph will be, what information you will include in your introduction, and what quotes will go in each paragraph. The outline should also include a draft of your thesis statement and all topic sentences.
2 diffrent ones
use my paper to answer an outline and my annotated
.
Submit the first two, double-spaced pages of your advocacy paper rou.docxjames891
Submit the first two, double-spaced pages of your advocacy paper rough draft.
Rough Draft Requirements:
MLA format
2 double-spaced pages
Evidence of research & attention to avoiding common logical fallacies.
.
Submit final project.1) Submit a brief abstract describing.docxjames891
Submit final project.
1) Submit a brief abstract describing of final project.
2) Prepare and deliver a 12 -15 slides presentation on your topic.
3) Submit final project materials.
A 500-700 word, double spaced paper, written in APA format, showing sources and a bibliography
Presentation materials (PPT, handouts, etc)
.
Submit Section II of the final project case study, in which you will.docxjames891
Submit Section II of the final project case study, in which you will address the organization's health promotion and disease prevention and management strategies. Specifically, you will critique the organization's healthy living programs, disease prevention and management programs, and non-programmatic services. You will assess the cultural competence of these services using the population health approach. Be sure to consider issues such as how well the organization's health promotion and management strategies address a wide range of cultural beliefs and whether the organization's programs and non-programmatic services help to reduce inequalities among members of the population.
.
Submit paper with two pages of information, in APA format, including.docxjames891
Submit paper with two pages of information, in APA format, including a cover page, an abstract statement, and references (five pages total, including a separate title page, a separate abstract page, a separate references page, and two pages with your research findings.)
Include these topics in your paper:
Describe the hardware components within a computer and explain their functions, including the motherboard, CPU, power supply, hard drive, RAM, video card, cooling fan and ventilation.
.
Submit paper with two pages of information, in APA format, inclu.docxjames891
The document instructs the reader to submit a five page paper in APA format, with a cover page, abstract page, and references page, along with two pages describing research findings on the following topics: the benefits of computers for individuals and businesses, the difference between data and information, and the ethical standards computer technicians should have when working on systems or handling data.
Submit one well-developed, thorough paragraph synopsis of Chapter 4 .docxjames891
The document provides instructions for a writing assignment requiring students to submit a one paragraph summary of Chapter 4 by 11 pm Tuesday. It must be in MLA format and consider the chapter's headings. The summary should provide an overview of the key events and ideas discussed in Chapter 4.
Substance-Related and Addictive Disordershttpsdoi-org.ezp.wal.docxjames891
Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders
https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm16
· Sections
· View Options
·
· Hide All Updates
· Tools
· Share
The substance-related disorders encompass 10 separate classes of drugs: alcohol; caffeine; cannabis; hallucinogens (with separate categories for phencyclidine [or similarly acting arylcyclohexylamines] and other hallucinogens); inhalants; opioids; sedatives, hypnotics, and anxiolytics; stimulants (amphetamine-type substances, cocaine, and other stimulants); tobacco; and other (or unknown) substances. These 10 classes are not fully distinct. All drugs that are taken in excess have in common direct activation of the brain reward system, which is involved in the reinforcement of behaviors and the production of memories. They produce such an intense activation of the reward system that normal activities may be neglected. Instead of achieving reward system activation through adaptive behaviors, drugs of abuse directly activate the reward pathways(Koob 2006). The pharmacological mechanisms by which each class of drugs produces reward are different, but the drugs typically activate the system and produce feelings of pleasure, often referred to as a “high.” Furthermore, individuals with lower levels of self-control, which may reflect impairments of brain inhibitory mechanisms, may be particularly predisposed to develop substance use disorders, suggesting that the roots of substance use disorders for some persons can be seen in behaviors long before the onset of actual substance use itself(Moffitt et al. 2011).
In addition to the substance-related disorders, this chapter also includes gambling disorder, reflecting evidence that gambling behaviors activate reward systems similar to those activated by drugs of abuse and produce some behavioral symptoms that appear comparable to those produced by the substance use disorders. Other excessive behavioral patterns, such as Internet gaming, have also been described, but the research on these and other behavioral syndromes is less clear. Thus, groups of repetitive behaviors, which some term behavioral addictions, with such subcategories as “sex addiction,” “exercise addiction,” or “shopping addiction,” are not included because at this time there is insufficient peer-reviewed evidence to establish the diagnostic criteria and course descriptions needed to identify these behaviors as mental disorders.
The substance-related disorders are divided into two groups: substance use disorders and substance-induced disorders. The following conditions may be classified as substance-induced: intoxication, withdrawal, and other substance/medication-induced mental disorders (psychotic disorders, bipolar and related disorders, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, sleep disorders, sexual dysfunctions, delirium, and neurocognitive disorders).
The current section begins with a general discussion of cri.
SubstanceIndividual issues, dynamics, and behaviors associated .docxjames891
Substance:
Individual issues, dynamics, and behaviors associated with the use of this substance (including common co-occurring disorders)
1. Depression is a common co-occurring disorder (reference)
Systemic and relational dynamics associated with the use of this substance
1. Family antisocial behavior is a common correlate of the use of this substance (reference)
Treatment Type
Promoting engagement in treatment
Changing family dynamics and addictive behaviors
Relapse prevention
Systemic
1. Non-using family members participate in the X program, which consists of …. (reference)
1. Family and substance user engage in X family therapy (reference)
Non-systemic
1. User and family members continue to participate in a regular basis in X support group meetings (reference).
Mystery Fiction
History
*
The Problem of DefinitionDetective story, crime fiction, mystery, police novel?Two essential qualifications:
Must present a problem or puzzle.
The problem must be solved by an amateur or professional detective through the process of deduction.Rigid classifications don’t work.All variations of sensational literature.
*
Forms of Mystery FictionGolden Age WritersHard-boiled Private Eyes of Dashiell Hammett and Raymond ChandlerCoziesPolice Procedurals of Ed McBainClassic private-eye puzzlers of Sue Grafton and Robert ParkerMedical mysteries of Patricia Cornwell and Michael Palmer.
*
PopularityMore widely read than any other class of fiction in the US and United Kingdom.
1995: 63 million mystery and detective novels published.
2004: 5,000 mystery titles published in U.S. alone.Fascination with death and crime, good & evil.Pleasurable excitementUnlike real life, injustice is redressed.
Crime literature from the 1890s offered a reassuring world in which criminals were discovered and punished.
*
Why Read Mysteries?“Detective stories keep alive a view of the world that ought to be true. Of course, people read them for fun, for diversion. . . . But underneath they feed a hunger for justice. . . . You show them by stealth the orderly world in which we should all try to be living.” “Detective stories contain a dream of justice. They project a vision of the world in which wrongs are righted, and villains are betrayed by clues that they did not know they were leaving. . . .A world in which murderers are caught and hanged, and innocent victims are avenged, and future murders are deterred” Dorothy Sayers and Jill Paton Walsh (Lord Peter Wimsey speaking in Thrones, Dominations, 1936/1988)
*
Cultural OriginsWhich came first, the detective story or the detective?Some historians assert that in order for there to be fictional detectives, there first needed to be real-life detectives.Others believe that murder and detection can be traced to the Bible and Herodotus.Detectives and police forces are relatively new professions that developed in the late 1700s and early 1800s.
*
Cultural OriginsIn 1812, Napolean’s Gendarmerie included Le S.
Submitting Files - Lab UtilitiesObjective of the activity.docxjames891
Submitting Files - Lab Utilities:
Objective of the activity
After becoming familiar with the elements of an information system and with the Windows operating system, students will perform activities with utility programs.
Instructions
What are we going to do?
After reviewing the material and accessing the tutorials, students will carry out the following activities:
"Disk cleanup"
Defragment your computer's hard drive
Customize the "Desktop"
Create on your computer a "folder" with the name PRO1101 which in turn has four "folders"
How are you going to do?
In a Word document, paste the screenshots that show:
the "Disk cleanup" process.
the process of defragmenting your computer's hard drive.
the personalized "Desktop" with a photo of your favorite pet.
The creation of the folders and subfolders created on your computer (documents). The main folder should be named PRO1101. Within this folder you must create the following subfolders:
Introduction and literature
MS Power Point
MS Word
MS Excel
Deliverable
The activity is individual. The work must be delivered on time, without spelling or grammatical errors. The works will be submitted to the tool to detect similarity of content (now Urkund)
Submit a single document from a word processor that contains the screenshots of the exercises performed:
"Disk cleanup"
Defragmentation of your computer's hard drive.
Personalized "Desktop" with the photo of your favorite pet.
Hierarchy of folders and subfolders created on your computer (documents).
Save the document with the name Practical Utility Programs. Include your name when saving the document eg Utility Programs - Gadiel
.
Substantive response, Please further discussion.APA formatAt.docxjames891
Substantive response, Please further discussion.
APA format
At least 2 references
175 word minimum
Respond to the following:
Briana
Travers
7:05 PM
Here are some of the best strategies that can be used to protect health care facilities:
1. Efficient communication - embracing honest and open communication between health care providers and the patient and patients' family help in reducing medical malpractice claims. This is because, clear answers and instructions will be given, realistic goals are set and the patient feel the openness of that genuine care. Lack of disclosure in care process result in more liability issues.
2. Informed consent - before any medical procedure, the patient should be informed of the procedure and the risks involved and should therefore sign the informed consent. This help in protecting the health facility from liability issues in case a complication develop.
3. Ensuring there is sufficient follow up of diagnostic tests and specialist referral. Inadequate follow up have resulted in serious litigation as patient fails to receive the appropriate treatment.
4. Ensuring proper training of their staffs and that the health care workers stay up-to-date with current developments in there areas of expertise.This help reduce medical liability issues which normally focus on current developments in areas of practice.
5. Ensuring staffs have technical skills, systems are working well with back ups systems available and proper documentation.
Some of the common and serious liability issues are:
Missed or delay diagnosis leading to worsening of the patient and even death.
Surgical treatment complications
Medication errors due to poor documentation or miss diagnosis.
These medical issues can easily be identified and verified hence the facility is likely to be found guilty if necessary strategies were not employed to avoid these errors.
.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, VOL. , NO. , –http.docx
1. SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE
–
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Prescription Opioid Craving: Relationship With Pain and
Substance Use-Related
Characteristics
Lisham Ashrafiouna , b
a Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University,
Suicide Prevention,
Canandaigua VA Medical Center, Canandaigua, New York, USA
KEYWORDS
Craving; prescription opioids;
pain; desire; opiates
ABSTRACT
Background: Craving is associated with prescription opioid use
in opioid-addicted pain patients. Objec-
tives: This study evaluated the relationship between craving for
prescription opioids and selected
pain and substance use characteristics. Method: In this cross-
sectional study, patients (N = 106) being
treated for opioid dependence were recruited from one of three
sites from December 2012 to April
2013. Participants completed the multi-dimensional Desire for
2. Drugs Questionnaire to assess crav-
ing, and other questionnaires to assess pain, substance use, and
demographic characteristics. Data
were analyzed using Pearson product-by-moment correlations,
ANOVAs, and multiple linear regres-
sions. Results: At the bivariate level, desire-and-intention to use
prescription opioids and craving for
relief from negative states were positively associated with both
pain severity and interference. Lin-
ear regression analyses revealed significant positive
associations between Desire-and-Intention sub-
scale scores and obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors
associated with prescription opioids
and pain severity. Negative Reinforcement subscales scores
were positively associated with obsessive
thoughts and compulsive behaviors associated with prescription
opioids and the outcome expectan-
cies of pain reduction, but not pain severity.
Conclusions/Importance: This study extended previous
research assessing the link between pain and craving by
demonstrating that desire-and-intention, but
not craving for the negative reinforcing effects are associated
with pain severity after considering var-
ious substance use characteristics. Additional research is needed
to clarify the relationship between
pain and aspects of craving while also considering pain-specific
covariates. This study highlights that
the multi-dimensionality of craving is an important aspect to
consider when clinicians and researchers
evaluate the relationship between pain and craving.
Prescription opioid misuse has increased dramatically in
the past decade (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Ser-
vices Administration, 2013a, 2013b). Research has shown
that pain is common among patients with substance use
disorders (SUDs), and in particular with opioid use dis-
3. orders. For example, Trafton, Oliva, Horst, Minkel, &
Humphreys (2004) reported that 52% of patients receiv-
ing treatment for opioid addiction reported moderate to
severe pain. Among SUD patients, pain has been associ-
ated with higher rates of treatment drop-out, nonmedi-
cal use of prescription sedatives, illicit substance use, and
overdose (Bonar, Ilgen, Walton, & Bohnert, 2014; Britton,
Wines, & Conner, 2010; Caldeiro et al., 2008; Larson et al.,
2007; Potter, Prather, & Weiss, 2008; Trafton et al., 2004).
In addition, Price, Ilgen, and Bohnert (2011) found that
increased nonmedical prescription opioid use was associ-
ated with greater pain severity.
Clinicians and researchers have hypothesized that
craving may contribute to these poorer pain and
CONTACT Lisham Ashrafioun [email protected] V
Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Canandaigua VA
addiction-related clinical outcomes (Martel, Dolman,
Edwards, Jamison, & Wasan, 2014; Trafton et al., 2004;
Wasan et al., 2009; Wasan et al., 2012).Although the
definition of craving has been debated (Skinner & Aubin,
2010; Tiffany & Wray, 2012), researchers have defined
craving as an intense subjective desire to use a sub-
stance, in this case prescription opioids (see Rosenberg,
2009 for a review). Using various definitions of crav-
ing, numerous models of craving have been proposed
with many focusing on the negative reinforcing effects
of substances (Skinner & Aubin, 2010). These negative
reinforcement models generally propose that individuals
are motivated to use substances to relieve a variety of
negative experiences. For example, Khantzian, Mack,
& Schatzberg (1974) proposed that individuals resort
4. to opioid use to self-medicate negative emotions such
as anxiety and depression. In the case of the relation-
ship between craving and pain, negative reinforcement
models of drug addiction might predict that prescription
This article not subject to US copyright law.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1188948
mailto:[email protected]
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE 1513
opioids are reinforcing because they relieve, attenuate,
help avoid, or help escape negative thoughts, emotions,
and/or experiences related to pain (Garland, Froeliger,
Zeidan, Partin, & Howard, 2013; Skinner & Aubin, 2010).
For example, Garland et al.’s (2013) model of chronic pain
and opioid addiction posits that individuals crave opioids
to maintain psychological well-being when experiencing
recurrent pain. Specifically, individuals use opioids to
relieve pain-related stress and negative emotions. Cues
paired with this opioid use (e.g., sight of pills) capture
and hold one’s attention and such exposure elicits craving
(Garland et al., 2013).
Despite empirical evidence and theoretical support of
the relationship between craving and pain, research on
their relationship is equivocal. For example, several inves-
tigations have found no significant difference in pain lev-
els among pain clinic patients as a function of craving
(Martel, Dolman, et al., 2014; Wasan et al., 2009; Wasan
et al., 2012). These studies are consistent with another
investigation that found no relationship between crav-
ing and pain severity among university students report-
ing prescription opioid use in their lifetime (Ashrafioun &
5. Carels, 2014). On the other hand, some investigators have
found a relationship between craving and pain severity.
For example, Rosenblum and colleagues (2003) found a
significant relationship between craving and pain severity
among patients in methadone maintenance and inpatient
drug treatment who had chronic pain even after control-
ling for withdrawal pain, demographics, number of drugs
used, pain as a reason for use, chronic illness, psychiatric
diagnosis and distress, and months in drug treatment.
Taken together, the methodological differences in
these studies may provide important insights for the
disparate findings. For example, there were differences in
the setting from which participants were recruited (pain
clinics, a university, inpatient drug treatment), the opera-
tionalization and measurement of pain (e.g., current pain
severity using a visual analog scale, average pain in the
past 24 hours, worst pain level over the last 6 months,
pain interference scores) and the measurement of craving
(visual analog scales for current craving and craving
in past 24 hours, multi-dimensional craving measure,
craving for opioids vs. for any drug). Other differences
might include order of pain and addiction onset and
participant interaction with healthcare professionals over
the course of their treatment for pain and/or addiction.
The current literature on the relationship between
craving and pain could be extended and improved in sev-
eral ways. Assessing prescription opioid craving utilizing
a multi-dimensional measure of current craving would
provide a more nuanced evaluation of craving compared
to that of a single-item rating scale. In addition, recruit-
ing participants with a range of pain severity scores from
several SUD treatment settings would increase the gen-
eralizability of this line of research. Furthermore, it may
6. be useful to examine other substance use-related factors
that may contribute to or exacerbate craving for prescrip-
tion opioids. Drug use severity and psychiatric sever-
ity are two factors that may impact the extent to which
one craves prescription opioids (e.g., Cicero, Lynskey,
Todorov, Inciardi, & Surratt, 2008; Tiffany & Wray, 2012).
In addition, there are theoretical, relationships between
increased craving and endorsement of several cognitive-
behavioral factors, such as outcome expectancies, and
obsessive thinking; however, there is limited empirical
investigations assessing these relationships (e.g., Franken,
2003; Ilgen et al., 2011; Marlatt, 1985).
Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the
associations between craving, assessed using a multi-
dimensional questionnaire, and pain-related characteris-
tics, cognitive-behavioral aspects of substance use, and
psychiatric problems. Although this study did not assess
specific chronic pain conditions and specific impacts on
individuals’ psychosocial functioning, its broad objective
was to assess pain intensity and craving in the context
of other key substance use and mental health character-
istics. Specifically, it was hypothesized that more intense
craving would be positively associated with pain sever-
ity, expected reduction of pain from prescription opioids,
obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors related to
prescription opioids, and drug use severity. In addition, it
was hypothesized that the relationship between prescrip-
tion opioid craving and pain severity would persist when
controlling for the variance explained by those key sub-
stance use characteristics described above.
Method
Participants and procedure
7. Following approval of the project by the Institutional
Review Board, participants were recruited from Decem-
ber 2012 to April 2013 at one of three addiction treatment
centers: an urban community based outpatient substance
abuse and methadone maintenance program that serves
mostly those from the inner city of Detroit; (2) a sub-
urban community-based behavioral health care agency
that has inpatient and outpatient programs serving rural,
suburban, and urban populations in northwest Ohio; or
(3) an outpatient university-based addiction medicine
clinic providing methadone and buprenorphine mainte-
nance serving rural, suburban, and urban populations
in Western New York. Individuals were eligible if they
were between the ages of 18 and 65, were able to read
English, were opioid dependent, and preferred prescrip-
tion opioids as their primary drug of choice. Clinical staff
1514 L. ASHRAFIOUN
Mean (SD) or % of
Recruitment site area
Sex
9. a In the past three months.
imaginable).
(completely interferes).
provided the researcher with individuals who had been
using prescription opioids to further assess eligibility and
interest. After providing consent, participants completed
a multi-item craving questionnaire and a battery of other
questionnaires (described below). To conclude, partici-
pants were debriefed and given a card with $20 credit for
compensation.
A total of 127 individuals were approached to assess
their interest in participation, 12 of whom were not
interested or were unavailable. Of the remaining 115
individuals, nine were excluded because they did not
meet the eligibility criteria. Tables 1 and 2 display infor-
mation regarding demographic, pain, and substance use
characteristics on the 106 participants.
.
Mean (SD) or % of
11. Method of procurement
Stolen
Any non-
Last time used prescription opioids
OCDS-
PMEQd
DDQe
Desire-and-
maintenance treatment
drug.
c Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale-Revised; scores range
d Pain Medication Expectancy Questionnaire; scores range from
12. for the Desire-and
Inte
subscale.
Measures
Desires for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ)
The DDQ, which originally written for heroin crav-
ing (Franken, Hendriks, & Van Den Brink, 2002), was
adapted to assess current craving for prescription opioids.
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE 1515
Respondents were asked to indicate their level of agree-
ment with each of 13 items using a seven-point Likert
Scale, so that higher scores indicated stronger craving.
Franken et al. (2002) reported support for the validity and
reliability for three subscales: (1) Desire-and-Intention
(i.e., the desire and intention to use prescription opi-
oids), (2) Negative Reinforcement (i.e., craving for the
relief from negative states), and (3) Control (i.e., per-
ceived control over use). In the present sample, internal
consistency reliabilities were .90 for the Desire-and-
Intention subscale, .80 for the Negative Reinforcement
subscale, and .54 for the Control subscale. Given the
relatively low internal consistency reliability for the
Control subscale, only the Desire-and-Intention and
Negative Reinforcement subscales were included in the
analyses.
Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale-Revised
13. (OCDS-R)
Morgan, Morgenstern, Blanchard, Labouvie, & Bux
(2004) revised the original OCDS (Anton, Moak, &
Latham, 1995) that asks about experiences such as the fre-
quency of obsessive thoughts of drug use, amount of dis-
tress associated with thoughts of drug use, amount of time
spent using drugs, drug-related interference in daily activ-
ities, and perceived degree of control over drug use over
the last week. Higher scores on the OCDS-R suggest more
obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors associated
with prescription opioids. Morgan et al. (2004) provided
support for the psychometric properties for the OCDS-R.
Internal consistency reliability for the current sample was
.90.
Pain Medication Expectancies Questionnaire (PMEQ)
The PMEQ is a 38-item measure designed to assess out-
come expectancies of prescription opioids (Ilgen et al.,
2011). Respondents are asked to rate the likelihood from
1 (“Not at all likely”) to 10 (“Very likely”) that they would
use a pain medication for each of the 38 reasons divided
into three subscales: (1) pleasure/social enhancement, (2)
pain reduction, and (3) negative experience reduction.
Higher scores suggest greater endorsement of prescrip-
tion opioid use outcome expectancies. Ilgen et al. (2011)
found initial psychometric support for these subscales.
Internal consistency reliabilities in the current sample
were .98 for the pleasure/social enhancement subscale, .92
for the pain subscale, and .97 for the negative experience
reduction subscale.
Self-administered Addiction Severity Index (ASI)
The drug use and psychiatric severity indices of the ASI
were utilized (McLellan, Luborsky, Woody, & O’Brien,
1980). Computational formulas were used to generate
14. composite scores that range from 0 (no endorsement of
any problems) to 1 (maximal endorsement of all prob-
lems). Research supports the psychometric properties of
the self-administered ASI (McLellan et al., 1980; Rosen,
Henson, Finney, & Moos, 2000).
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form
The Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess a partici-
pant’s pain severity and interference in daily functioning
due to pain (Cleeland & Ryan, 1994). The first two ques-
tions asked if respondents had experienced pain other
than everyday types of pain (e.g., minor headaches, tooth
aches, sprains) over the last three months and, if so, the
location of the pain. Pain severity is calculated by aver-
aging respondents’ worst, least, and average pain in the
last three months, and their current pain each of which
based on an 11-point rating scale from 0 (“No Pain”)
to 10 (“Worst Pain Imaginable”). Respondents were also
asked to rate how much their pain interfered with func-
tioning in seven domains from 0 (“Does not interfere”)
to 10 (“Completely interferes”). Cleeland (2009) provides
support for the psychometric properties of the origi-
nal BPI. Internal consistency reliabilities for the present
sample were .93 for pain intensity and .89 for pain
interference.
Demographics and prescription opioid questionnaire
This questionnaire assessed participants’ demographic
characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, age), and prescription
opioid use history (e.g., opioids used, routes of adminis-
tration).
Data analysis
Frequency counts and means and standard deviations
were calculated to summarize features of the sample. Pre-
liminary analyses included the testing of bivariate rela-
15. tionships between craving and other measured variables
using t-tests, ANOVAs, and Pearson product-by-moment
correlations. Primary analyses were tested using linear
regression analyses with DDQ-Desire-and-Intention and
DDQ-Negative Reinforcement scores as dependent vari-
ables and with simultaneous entry of ASI-Drug Use and
Psychiatric Indices, OCDS-R, PMEQ, and BPI pain sever-
ity scores as the independent variables. Basic statistical
assumptions were met and suggestions for decreasing
the likelihood of overfitting were taken (Babyak, 2004).
Variables entered in the regression models were selected
because research has found them to be associated with
craving (e.g., Cicero et al., 2008; Franken, 2003; Ilgen
et al., 2011; Tiffany & Wray, 2012). Analyses were con-
ducted with the entire sample regardless of one’s pain
status.
1516 L. ASHRAFIOUN
Results
Relationship between craving and other key
variables
Demographics
There were no significant associations between the crav-
ing subscale scores and gender (tDesire-and-intention(103)
= −1.00, p = .32; tNegativeReinforcement(103) = −.52,
p = .61), race (tDesire-and-intention(103) = −1.83, p
= .07; tNegativeReinforcement(103) = −.14, p = .89),
level of education (FDesire-and-intention(3,97) = .99,
p = .40; FNegativeReinforcement(3,97) = 1.44, p = .24),
marital status (tDesire-and-intention(103) = .06, p =
.95;tNegativeReinforcement(103) = .19, p = .85). In addition,
16. there was no significant correlations between craving
subscales scores and age (rDesire-and-intention(102) = .09,
p = .36; rNegativeReinforcement(102) = −.08, p = .42) or
days worked (FDesire-and-intention(102) = −.10, p = .34;
rNegativeReinforcement(102) = −.03, p = .75).
Pain
To identify whether current craving was associated with
several aspects of pain, the associations between Desire-
and-Intention scores and Negative Reinforcement scores
with four specific pain-related variables were assessed
(see Table 3). Scores on the Desire-and-Intention sub-
scale were significantly greater among those participants
who reported experiencing pain in the last three months
(M = 25.5, SD = 13.4) compared to those who did not
(M = 18.0, SD = 8.2), t(104) = −2.33, p < .05. Desire-
and-intention of using prescription opioids was also sig-
nificantly correlated with pain severity, r(104) = .35, p <
.001, pain interference, r(102) = .28, p < .01, and num-
ber of pain locations, r(104) = .20, p < .001. There was
no significant association between pain reported in the
past three months and Negative Reinforcement scores,
t(104) = −1.35, p > .05 (see Table 3). However, Nega-
tive Reinforcement scores were significantly, though not
as strongly, associated with both pain severity, r(104) =
.20, p < .05, and pain interference, r(102) = .23, p < .05,
but not with number of pain locations, r(104) = .16, p >
.05.
Prescription opioid use
The relationships between craving subscale scores several
prescription opioid use characteristics were also evaluated
(see Table 3). Those who reported having used prescrip-
tion opioids within the past seven days had significantly
higher craving scores (M = 31.5, SD = 2.5) than those
who reported having last used within in the previous 31
17. to 90 days (M = 16.4, SD = 2.8) and those who reported
having last used more than 90 days previously (M = 17.4,
Table
pre-
scription opioid use characteristics.
DDQ-Desire-and-
Intentiona
DDQ-Negative
Reinforcementa
F-, t-, or r F-, t-, or r
Characteristics M (SD) statistic M (SD) statistic
Pain experienced in
pa
∗
# of days since last
use
∗ ∗
# of pain locationsb — ∗ —
Pain severity — ∗ ∗ ∗ — ∗
Pain interferenceb — ∗ ∗ — ∗
OCDS-Rc — ∗ ∗ ∗ — ∗ ∗ ∗
PMEQd
Pleasure/social
enhancement
18. — ∗ ∗ — ∗ ∗ ∗
Pain relief — ∗ ∗ ∗ — ∗ ∗ ∗
Negative
experience
reduction
— ∗ ∗ — ∗ ∗ ∗
ASIe
Psychiatric
status
— ∗ — ∗
Drug use — ∗ —
∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
for the Desire-and
subscale.
b In the past three months.
c Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale-Revised.
d Pain Medication Expectancy Questionnaire.
e Addiction Severity Index
SD = 2.4), F(3,69) = 7.19, p < .001, partial η2 = .24.
However, Negative Reinforcement from using prescrip-
tion opioids did not differ as a function of the number of
days since last use, F(3,69) = 1.03, p > .05, partial η2 =
.04.
19. Furthermore, desire-and-intention to use prescrip-
tion opioids was significantly associated with obsessive
thoughts and compulsive behaviors related to prescrip-
tion opioids, r(103) = .49, p < .001. This dimension of
craving was also significantly associated with outcomes
expectancies of pleasure and social enhancement, r(103)
= .30, p < .005, pain reduction, r(103) = .43, p < .001, and
anticipation of relief from negative experiences, r(102)
= .28, p < .005. Similarly, craving for relief from neg-
ative states was significantly associated with obsessive
thoughts and compulsive behaviors related to about pre-
scription opioids, r(103) = .44, p < .001. In addition,
scores were significantly positively associated with out-
comes expectancies of pleasure and social enhancement,
r(103) = .43, p < .001,pain reduction, r(103) = .47, p <
.001, and anticipation of relief from negative experiences,
r(102) = .47, p < .001.
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE 1517
desires for drug questionnaire (DDQ) desire-and-intention
and DDQ negative reinforcement subscale and drug use
characteristics.
DV IV β B SE t-value
DDQ-Desire-and-
Intention
OCDS- ∗ ∗
∗
PMEQ-
ASI-
20. ASI-
DDQ-Negative
Reinforcement
OCDS- ∗
PMEQ- ∗
ASI-
ASI-
DDQ-Desire-and-
-
Negative Rei
∗ ∗
∗
Abbreviations: DV—Dependent Variable; IV—Independent
Variable; OCDS-
R—Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale-Revised; PMEQ—
Pain Medication
Expectancy Questionnaire; ASI—Addiction Severity Index.
Both psychiatric status, r(101) = .26, p < .01, and drug
use severity, r(103) = .21, p < .05, were significantly asso-
ciated with Desire-and-Intention scores. Although psy-
chiatric status was significantly associated with Negative
Reinforcement scores, r(101) = .33, p < .001, drug use
severity was not, r(103) = .17, p > .05.
Regression analyses assessing unique associations
between craving and selected pain and drug use
characteristics
Results of regression analyses revealed a significant model
for DDQ-Desire-and-Intention scores, F(5,95) = 8.80, p
<.001, adjusted R2 = .28 (see Table 4). Specifically, obses-
21. sive thoughts and compulsive behaviors (β = .33), and
pain severity scores (β = .20) were significantly positively
associated with DDQ-Desire-and-Intention scores. This
indicates that obsessive thoughts and compulsive behav-
iors related to prescription opioids were the strongest cor-
relate of desire-and-intention to use prescription opioids,
although pain severity was also significantly associated
with this type of craving.
For the regression with DDQ-Negative Reinforcement
scores as the dependent variable, the overall model was
significant, F(5,96) = 7.74, p <.001, adjusted R2 = .25.
Obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors (β = .24)
and the outcome expectancy of pain reduction (β = .29)
were significantly associated with DDQ-Negative Rein-
forcement scores (see Table 4). This suggests that greater
craving to reduce negatives states was associated with
obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors related to
prescription opioids and greater expectancies of prescrip-
tion opioids to relieve pain when controlling for the vari-
ance explained by the other key characteristics.
Discussion
The current findings indicate that desire-and-intention
to use prescription opioids and, to a lesser extent, craving
for relief from negative states, were significantly asso-
ciated with a number of pain-related characteristics,
including having experienced pain over the past three
months, pain severity, number of pain locations, and pain
interference. When included in a regression model, the
significant association between pain severity and desire-
and-intention persisted after including key substance
use characteristics (i.e., pain medication expectancies,
obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors related
to prescription opioids, drug use severity). This lat-
22. ter finding is important because it suggests that those
theoretically-driven substance use characteristics did not
account for the relationship between desire-and-intention
to use and pain severity.
This study provides further evidence that pain and
craving are associated among addiction treatment
patients (Rosenblum et al., 2003) and may provide
an explanation for the inconsistent results in previous
research on the relationship between pain and craving.
This study examined the relationship between craving
and pain using a multi-dimensional measure of craving,
which provides a more nuanced evaluation of prescrip-
tion opioid craving. Previous research has largely utilized
single-item scales and respondents may find it difficult
to characterize a complex phenomenon using a single
numeral (Rosenberg, 2009). This finding highlights
the importance of using a more sophisticated measure
of craving among chronic pain and opioid-addicted
patients.
The results of the current study provide partial sup-
port for the hypothesis that pain would be associated with
craving for prescription opioids to relieve negative states.
Although this relationship was significant in the bivari-
ate analysis, it was no longer significant after adjusting
for other substance use-related variables. This is perhaps
surprising given that addicted individuals might take pre-
scription opioids for pain and/or other associated nega-
tive thoughts or emotions (Garland et al., 2013; Martel,
Dolman, et al., 2014; Martel, Jamison, Wasan, & Edwards,
2014). One possibility for the relatively weak relationship
in this study was that the wording of the statements on
the Negative Reinforcement subscale did not adequately
assess the negative experiences of those with co-occurring
pain and addiction. The Negative Reinforcement sub-
23. scale consists of statements about general life problems
(e.g., “I would feel as if all the bad things in my life had
disappeared if I used prescription opioids right now”)
and negative experiences focused on pain-related nega-
tive experiences (e.g., anxiety, physical pain/discomfort,
1518 L. ASHRAFIOUN
pain catastrophizing) may better capture their experi-
ences. Another possibility is that people’s beliefs about
the effects of prescription opioids are more important
than their pain severity. This would be consistent with
the finding that pain reduction outcome expectancies
were associated with craving to relieve negative states and
pain severity was not. Additional research is needed to
assess pain reduction outcome expectancies as a poten-
tial mediator of pain and craving for relief from negative
states.
Another novel contribution to the pain and craving lit-
erature is that obsessive thoughts and compulsive behav-
iors related to prescription opioids appear to be another
key factor when considering craving for prescription opi-
oids. This was among the strongest correlates of desire-
and-intention to use prescription opioids and craving
to relieve negative states, which is consistent with pre-
vious research with heroin (Franken, 2002) and alco-
hol (Bohn, Krahn, & Staehler, 1995; Flannery, Volpicelli,
& Pettinati, 1999; Rosenberg & Mazzola, 2007). While
these obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors may
be conceptualized as craving, researchers have indicated
that the construct measured in the OCDS is a “cogni-
tive correlate” of craving that seems to be examining
a different aspect of substance use dependence that is
24. largely independent of craving (Anton, Moak, & Latham,
1996). This distinction is consistent with Franken’s model
of drug craving, which posits that obsessive thoughts
are one of several factors that are affected by and can
affect one’s level of craving (Franken, 2003). Specifi-
cally, he proposed that attentional bias to drug cues
can elicit or enhance existing craving which, once acti-
vated, can increase attentional bias, obsessive thoughts,
and the likelihood of relapse (Franken, 2003).Further
research is needed to better understand how pain sever-
ity specifically may contribute to the relationship between
obsessive thoughts, attentional bias, and current craving
among individuals with chronic pain who are addicted to
opioids.
These findings should be taken in consideration in
the context of several limitations. For example, many of
the participants were African American which may affect
ratings of pain severity and craving. Carter et al. (2010)
found that African Americans reported lower craving to
smoke cigarettes compared to Caucasian counterparts.
Furthermore, Riley and colleagues (2002) found that
African Americans report greater emotional responses
to pain and unpleasantness relative to Caucasians. These
studies suggest that results observed in the current study
may differ with a sample with a smaller proportion of
African Americans. However, it is important to note that
there were no differences in craving as a function of race
in this study. Another limitation is that the majority of the
sample was receiving opioid maintenance therapy and no
information was collected on the dosing or when those
participants last took their medication. This is significant
given that size and timing of the last dose of methadone
can impact craving (Ilgen, Jain, Kim, & Trafton, 2008).
In addition, withdrawal from opioids can impact pain
25. severity given that symptoms include back and muscle
aches, cramps, and joint pain among others. The inter-
pretation of the results is also complicated by the varying
time points in which the variables were measured (e.g.,
current craving, past year drug use severity, three-month
pain scores, past-week obsessive thoughts and compul-
sive behaviors). For example, assessing one’s craving in
the past three months may depict a different relationship
with pain intensity in the past three months compared
to one’s current craving. In addition, this study was lim-
ited in its sample size, which restricted the number of
variables that could be accounted for in the multivariate
analyses.
When considering the findings of this investigation in
the context of the extant literature on pain and craving,
this study does not provide definitive evidence for the
pain-craving relationship but does provide some impor-
tant insights. This adds to the evidence that pain and
craving are associated among patients involved in opioid
maintenance programs. In this study, pain and craving
were both measured as continuous variables rather than
dichotomous or categorical variables, which decrease
loss of variability subsumed within groups, effect size,
power, spurious statistical significance, and measurement
reliability. Nonetheless, perhaps setting may be impor-
tant such that substance use disorder treatment centers
are places in which patients have their drug of choice
(e.g., oxycodone, hydrocodone) taken away thus increas-
ing their pain and craving for it. On the other hand,
pain clinics, where several studies have recruited par-
ticipants, may be viewed as a place in which patients
receive their drug of choice and thus their craving and
pain is reduced with receipt of the opioids. The current
study also encourages further research recruiting African
Americans, given that previous research was primarily
26. in Caucasians. Furthermore, it also encourages further
use of multi-dimensional measures, such as the DDQ.
Single-item measures are advantageous due to their
brevity; however, the DDQ takes minutes to complete
and can provide more specific information. Nonetheless,
the modest relationship between pain severity and crav-
ing after accounting for only select substance use char-
acteristics highlights that clinicians should be cognizant
of not overestimating the relationship between pain and
craving. Clinicians and patients may be better served
by addressing the relationship between craving and pain
medication expectancies and/or obsessive thoughts and
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE 1519
compulsive behaviors given the more robust relationships
with these other substance use factors compared to pain.
Future research should also consider other pain-related
factors, such as pain condition and cognitive-behavioral
constructs of pain. Research has found a significant rela-
tionship between pain catastrophizing and craving (Mar-
tel, Jamison, et al., 2014) and studies could also assess
the association between craving and use and pain-related
coping skills and pain avoidance. In addition, although
research has demonstrated that craving prospectively pre-
dicts prescription opioid use (Tsui, Anderson, Strong, &
Stein, 2014), less is known regarding longitudinal trajec-
tories of opioid and nonopioid pain interventions on crav-
ing. This type of research could provide useful informa-
tion regarding the relative effectiveness of various pain
treatments on craving and the onset of prescription opi-
oid dependence. This may also provide an opportunity
to understand provider contributions to patient prescrip-
tion opioid outcome expectancies (e.g., patient knowledge
27. of opioid-induced hyperalgesia and withdrawal pain).
In sum, this study found that pain severity was associ-
ated with desire-and-intention to use prescription opi-
oid after accounting for key substance use characteristics.
For future studies, multi-dimensional craving measures
should be used and pain-related factors should also be
considered.
Glossary
Craving: An intense subjective desire to use a substance.
Negative reinforcement craving: Craving for the relief from
neg-
ative states.
Obsessive compulsive substance use: Frequent and distressing
preoccupation with using substances that interferes with
daily activity and is associated with little control over drug
use.
Pain interference: The extent to which pain interferes with var-
ious aspects of one’s life such as mood, engagement in daily
activities, etc.
Declaration of interest
The author reports no conflicts of interest. The author alone is
responsible for the content and writing of the article.
Funding
This work was funded by the American Psychological Associ-
ation, the APF/COGDOP, and the Katzner Graduate Student
Research and Professional Development Award.
28. Notes on contributor
Lisham Ashrafioun, PhD, is
a post-doctoral fellow at the
Department of Veterans Affairs
VISN 2 Center of Excellence
for Suicide Prevention and the
Department of Psychiatry at the
University of Rochester Med-
ical Center. Dr. Ashrafioun’s
research interests are related to
the intersection between sui-
cidal thoughts and behaviors,
substance use, and pain.
References
Anton, R. F., Moak, D. H., & Latham, P. (1995). The Obses-
sive Compulsive Drinking Scale: A self rated instrument for
the quantification of thoughts about alcohol and drinking
behavior. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 19,
92–99.
Anton, R. F., Moak, D. H., & Latham, P. (1996). The Obses-
sive Compulsive Drinking Scale: A new method of assessing
outcome in alcoholism treatment studies. Archives of Gen-
eral Psychiatry, 53, 225–231.
Ashrafioun, L., & Carels, R. A. (2014). Prescription opioid use
among university students: Assessment of post-cue expo-
sure craving. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 586–592.
Babyak, M. A. (2004). What you see may not be what you get:
A
brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-
type models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 411–421.
29. Bohn, M. J., Krahn, D. D., & Staehler, B. A. (1995). Develop-
ment and initial validation of a measure of drinking urges
in abstinent alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental
Research, 19, 600–606.
Bonar, E. E., Ilgen, M. A., Walton, M., & Bohnert, A. S.
(2014).
Associations among pain, non medical prescription opioid
use, and drug overdose history. American Journal on Addic-
tions, 23, 41–47.
Britton, P. C., Wines, J. D., Jr., & Conner, K. R. (2010). Non-
fatal overdose in the 12 months following treatment for
substance use disorders. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 107,
51–55.
Caldeiro, R. M., Malte, C. A., Calsyn, D. A., Baer, J. S.,
Nichol,
P., Kivlahan, D. R., & Saxon, A. J. (2008). The association
of persistent pain with out-patient addiction treatment out-
comes and service utilization.Addiction, 103, 1996–2005.
Carter, B. L., Paris, M. M., Lam, C. Y., Robinson, J. D., Tray-
lor, A. C., Waters, A. J., … Cinciripini, P. M. (2010). Real-
time craving differences between black and white smokers.
American Journal on Addictions, 19, 136–140.
Cicero, T. J., Lynskey, M., Todorov, A., Inciardi, J. A., & Sur-
ratt, H. L. (2008). Co-morbid pain and psychopathology in
males and females admitted to treatment for opioid anal-
gesic abuse. Pain, 139(1), 127–135.
Cleeland, C. S. (2009). The brief pain inventory: User guide.
Houston, TX: The University of Texas MD Anderson Can-
cer Center.
30. Cleeland, C. S., & Ryan, K. M. (1994). Pain assessment: Global
use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Annals of the Academy of
Medicine, Singapore, 23, 129–138.
1520 L. ASHRAFIOUN
Flannery, B. A., Volpicelli, J. R., & Pettinati, H. M. (1999).
Psychometric properties of the penn alcohol craving scale.
Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 23, 1289–
1295.
Franken, I. H. A. (2003). Drug craving and addiction: Inte-
grating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological
approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Bio-
logical Psychiatry, 27, 563–579.
Franken, I. H. A., Hendriks, V. M., & Van Den Brink, W.
(2002).
Initial validation of two opiate craving questionnaires: The
obsessive compulsive drug use scale and the desires for drug
questionnaire. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 675–685.
Garland, E. L., Froeliger, B., Zeidan, F., Partin, K., & Howard,
M. O. (2013). The downward spiral of chronic pain, pre-
scription opioid misuse, and addiction: Cognitive, affective,
and neuropsychopharmacologic pathways. Neuroscience &
Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 2597–2607.
Ilgen, M. A., Jain, A., Kim, H. M., & Trafton, J. A. (2008). The
effect of stress on craving for methadone depends on the
timing of last methadone dose. Behaviour Research & Ther-
apy, 46, 1170–1175.
31. Ilgen, M. A., Roeder, K. M., Webster, L., Mowbray, O. P.,
Perron,
B. E., Chermack, S. T., & Bohnert, A. S. B. (2011). Measuring
pain medication expectancies in adults treated for substance
use disorders. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 115, 51–56.
Khantzian, E. J., Mack, J. E., & Schatzberg, A. F. (1974).
Heroin
use as an attempt to cope: Clinical observations. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 160–164.
Larson, M. J., Paasche-Orlow, M., Cheng, D. M., Lloyd-
Travaglini, C., Saitz, R., & Samet, J. H. (2007). Persis-
tent pain is associated with substance use after detoxifica-
tion: A prospective cohort analysis. Addiction, 102, 752–
760.
Marlatt, G. (1985). Cognitive factors in the relapse process. In
G.
A. Marlatt & J. R. Gordan (Eds.), Relapse prevention: Main-
tenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors (pp.
128–200). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Martel, M. O., Dolman, A. J., Edwards, R. R., Jamison, R. N.,
& Wasan, A. D. (2014). The association between nega-
tive affect and prescription opioid misuse in patients with
chronic pain: The mediating role of opioid craving. Journal
of Pain, 15, 90–100.
Martel, M. O., Jamison, R. N., Wasan, A. D., & Edwards, R. R.
(2014). The association between catastrophizing and crav-
ing in patients with chronic pain prescribed opioid therapy:
A preliminary analysis. Pain Medicine, 15, 1757–1764.
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., & O’Brien, C.
P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument
32. for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index.
Journal of Nervous & Mental Diseases, 168, 26–33.
Morgan, T. J., Morgenstern, J., Blanchard, K. A., Labouvie, E.,
& Bux, D. A. (2004). Development of the OCDS-Revised:
A measure of alcohol and drug urges with outpatient sub-
stance abuse clients. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18,
316–321.
Potter, J. S., Prather, K., & Weiss, R. D. (2008). Physical pain
and associated clinical characteristics in treatment-seeking
patients in four substance use disorder treatment modali-
ties. American Journal on Addictions, 17, 121–125.
Price, A. M., Ilgen, M. A., & Bohnert, A. S. B. (2011). Preva-
lence and correlates of nonmedical use of prescription opi-
oids in patients seen in a residential drug and alcohol treat-
ment program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41,
208–214.
Riley, J. L., Wade, J. B., Myers, C. D., Sheffield, D., Papas, R.
K.,
& Price, D. D. (2002). Racial/ethnic differences in the expe-
rience of chronic pain. Pain, 100, 291–298.
Rosen, C. S., Henson, B. R., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H.
(2000). Consistency of self-administered and interview-
based Addiction Severity Index composite scores. Addic-
tion, 95, 419–425.
Rosenberg, H. (2009). Clinical and laboratory assessment of the
subjective experience of drug craving. Clinical Psychology
Review, 29, 519–534.
Rosenberg, H., & Mazzola, J. (2007). Relationships among self-
report assessments of craving in binge-drinking university
33. students. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2811–2818.
Rosenblum, A., Joseph, H., Fong, C., Kipnis, S., Cleland, C.,
& Portenoy, R. K. (2003). Prevalence and characteristics
of chronic pain among chemically dependent patients in
methadone maintenance and residential treatment facil-
ities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289,
2370.
Skinner, M. D., & Aubin, H. J. (2010). Craving’s place in
addic-
tion theory: Contributions of the major models. Neuro-
science & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 606–623.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
(2013a). Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011: National
Estimates of Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits.
HHS Publication No.(SMA) 13-4760, DAWN Series D-39.
Rockville, MD: Author.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
(2013b). Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug
Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. NSDUH Series H-
47, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 13-4805. Rockville, MD:
Author.
Tiffany, S. T., & Wray, J. M. (2012). The clinical significance
of
drug craving. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
1248, 1–17.
Trafton, J. A., Oliva, E. M., Horst, D. A., Minkel, J. D., &
Humphreys, K. (2004). Treatment needs associated with
pain in substance use disorder patients: Implications for
concurrent treatment. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 73, 23–
31.
34. Tsui, J. I., Anderson, B. J., Strong, D. R., & Stein, M. D.
(2014).
Craving predicts opioid use in opioid-dependent patients
initiating buprenorphine treatment: A longitudinal study.
American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 40(2), 163–
169.
Wasan, A. D., Butler, S. F., Budman, S. H., Fernandez, K.,
Weiss,
R., Greenfield, S., & Jamison, R. N. (2009). Does report of
craving opioid medication predict aberrant drug behavior
among chronic pain patients? Clinical Journal of Pain, 25,
193–198.
Wasan, A. D., Ross, E. L., Michna, E., Chibnik, L., Greenfield,
S. F., Weiss, R. D., & Jamison, R. N. (2012). Craving of pre-
scription opioids in patients with chronic pain: A longitudi-
nal outcomes trial. Journal of Pain, 13, 146–154.
Copyright of Substance Use & Misuse is the property of Taylor
& Francis Ltd and its content
may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
listserv without the copyright
holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for
individual use.
AbstractGlossaryDeclaration of interestFundingReferences