So, your company has gone Lean, or is in the process of embarking in lean practices.
Maybe you are a manufacturer and implemented some Lean Manufacturing in your operational areas... Or you are a contractor, and are trying to deploy some solid Lean Project Management and Lean Planning in order to run more efficiently and effectively your contracts... Or, even greater, you have decided to restructure your organisation and embark in a company-wide Lean Management project..... Very positive indeed.
BUT: have you perhaps considered a potentially very serious draw-back capable of jeopardising and threatening your Lean Project in part or in full? Most probably or most definitely NOT.
Your very serious draw-back (and public enemy N. 1) is Stupidity!
by Carlo Scodanibbio
https://www.scodanibbio.com
WHY PEOPLE BULLSHIT AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT ITKevin Duncan
A quick analysis of this strange phenomenon, with some suggestions about how to cope with people who bullshit.
bulldictionary.com
Buy the book: http://amzn.to/2doeOTI
An analysis of why people bullshit and what you can do about it. A taster for The Dictionary of Business Bullshit and asking Kevin to speak on the subject.
REcent years have seen a rising interest for "swarms", meaning instant campaigns, unconferences, hackathons and other unorthodox constellations of people in action that are both collaborative and non-hierarchical. For years now I have been involved in policy initiatives that incorporate an element of that openness, of that fluidity. Can we really speak of policy making for swarms? If so, what does that mean?
These slides accompanied my talk at Big Picture Days Episode 1 in London, on June 1st 2013.
WHY PEOPLE BULLSHIT AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT ITKevin Duncan
A quick analysis of this strange phenomenon, with some suggestions about how to cope with people who bullshit.
bulldictionary.com
Buy the book: http://amzn.to/2doeOTI
An analysis of why people bullshit and what you can do about it. A taster for The Dictionary of Business Bullshit and asking Kevin to speak on the subject.
REcent years have seen a rising interest for "swarms", meaning instant campaigns, unconferences, hackathons and other unorthodox constellations of people in action that are both collaborative and non-hierarchical. For years now I have been involved in policy initiatives that incorporate an element of that openness, of that fluidity. Can we really speak of policy making for swarms? If so, what does that mean?
These slides accompanied my talk at Big Picture Days Episode 1 in London, on June 1st 2013.
http://www.captaincynic.com/thread/92431/laws-of-stupidity.htm Human ignorance and stupidity affects everyone, in both small and large ways. This presentation talks about this human characteristic and what could possibly be done to improve the situation.
I believe that between the covers of "The Tipping Point" ... Malcolm Gladwell provides us with three of the key components for a "Dream Lean-Startup Team"
The Community Manager's Guide to Mental Health PreparednessCosette Paneque
Are your community managers prepared to manage disclosures of abuse, self-harm, or suicide-ideation? This webinar for community managers is on how to be prepared and how to engage in self-care following potentially traumatic events online.
Malcolm Gladwell's classic, "The Tipping Point" has always been a major inspiration for me. The book is written in a very chatty, conversational style that masks the underlying logic and structure of Gladwell's "argument". In this presentation I have tried to strip it down to its bare bones ... and added a few thoughts of my own.
This article is the antidote to news. It is long, and you probably won’t be able to skim it. Thanks to heavy news consumption, many people have lost the reading habit and struggle to absorb more than four pages straight.
This article will show you how to get out of this trap – if you are not already too deeply in it.
Stop the picayune mind behavior! I’m mostly ‘anti conspiracy theorizing’ or that what some call ‘conspiracy’ thinking that is really a control judgment to reduce someone’s credibility with little or no regard for its appropriateness.
Chapter 4 Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural Re.docxrobertad6
Chapter 4: Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural Relativism from The Business
Ethics Workshop was adapted by Saylor Academy and is available under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license without attribution as requested by
the work's original creator or licensor. UMGC has modified this work and it is available under
the original license.
http://www.saylor.org/site/textbooks/The%20Business%20Ethics%20Workshop.pdf
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org
137
Chapter 4
Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural
Relativism
Chapter Overview
Chapter 4 "Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural Relativism" examines some theories guiding
ethical decisions in business. It considers reactions to the possibility that there are no universal
definitions of right and wrong, only different customs that change from one society to another.
4.1 What Is Cultural Relativism?
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E S
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org
138
1. Define cultural relativism.
2. Show how cultural relativism defies traditional ethics.
Nietzsche and the End of Traditional Ethics
“God is dead,” the declaration attributed to Friedrich Nietzsche, stands along with “I think, therefore I
am” (René Descartes, 1641) as philosophy’s most popularized—and parodied—phrases. The t-shirt
proclaiming “Nietzsche is dead, signed, God” is funny, but it doesn’t quite answer what Nietzsche was
saying in the late 1800s. What Nietzsche meant to launch was not only an assault on a certain religion but
also a suspicion of the idea that there’s one source of final justice for all reality. Nietzsche proposed that
different cultures and people each produce their own moral recommendations and prohibitions, and
there’s no way to indisputably prove that one set is simply and universally preferable to another. The
suspicion that there’s no final appeal—and therefore the values and morality practiced by a community
can’t be dismissed as wrong or inferior to those practiced elsewhere—is called cultural relativism.
Example: For most of us, the killing of a newborn would be among the most heinous of immoral acts; a
perpetrator would need to be purely evil or completely mad. The Inuit Eskimos, however, regularly
practiced female infanticide during their prehistory, and it was neither evil nor insane. Their brutal living
conditions required a population imbalance tipped toward hunters (males). Without that gender
selecting, the plain fact was the entire group faced starvation. At another place and time, Bernal
Diaz’s The Conquest of New Spain recounts the Spanish invasion of the Americas and includes multiple
reports of newborns sacrificed in bloody ceremonies that made perfect sense to the locals, but left
Spaniards astonished and appalle.
Tutorial08: Deploying lean principles is imperative in the service industry!Carlo Scodanibbio
"Traditional" Organisations waste resources and dissatisfy customers: the TNM Case.
a Tutorial by Carlo Scodanibbio
Read and download all tutorials published by Carlo Scodanibbio at
https://www.scodanibbio.com/site/tut.html
http://www.captaincynic.com/thread/92431/laws-of-stupidity.htm Human ignorance and stupidity affects everyone, in both small and large ways. This presentation talks about this human characteristic and what could possibly be done to improve the situation.
I believe that between the covers of "The Tipping Point" ... Malcolm Gladwell provides us with three of the key components for a "Dream Lean-Startup Team"
The Community Manager's Guide to Mental Health PreparednessCosette Paneque
Are your community managers prepared to manage disclosures of abuse, self-harm, or suicide-ideation? This webinar for community managers is on how to be prepared and how to engage in self-care following potentially traumatic events online.
Malcolm Gladwell's classic, "The Tipping Point" has always been a major inspiration for me. The book is written in a very chatty, conversational style that masks the underlying logic and structure of Gladwell's "argument". In this presentation I have tried to strip it down to its bare bones ... and added a few thoughts of my own.
This article is the antidote to news. It is long, and you probably won’t be able to skim it. Thanks to heavy news consumption, many people have lost the reading habit and struggle to absorb more than four pages straight.
This article will show you how to get out of this trap – if you are not already too deeply in it.
Stop the picayune mind behavior! I’m mostly ‘anti conspiracy theorizing’ or that what some call ‘conspiracy’ thinking that is really a control judgment to reduce someone’s credibility with little or no regard for its appropriateness.
Chapter 4 Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural Re.docxrobertad6
Chapter 4: Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural Relativism from The Business
Ethics Workshop was adapted by Saylor Academy and is available under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license without attribution as requested by
the work's original creator or licensor. UMGC has modified this work and it is available under
the original license.
http://www.saylor.org/site/textbooks/The%20Business%20Ethics%20Workshop.pdf
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org
137
Chapter 4
Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural
Relativism
Chapter Overview
Chapter 4 "Theories Responding to the Challenge of Cultural Relativism" examines some theories guiding
ethical decisions in business. It considers reactions to the possibility that there are no universal
definitions of right and wrong, only different customs that change from one society to another.
4.1 What Is Cultural Relativism?
L E A R N I N G O B J E C T I V E S
Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books Saylor.org
138
1. Define cultural relativism.
2. Show how cultural relativism defies traditional ethics.
Nietzsche and the End of Traditional Ethics
“God is dead,” the declaration attributed to Friedrich Nietzsche, stands along with “I think, therefore I
am” (René Descartes, 1641) as philosophy’s most popularized—and parodied—phrases. The t-shirt
proclaiming “Nietzsche is dead, signed, God” is funny, but it doesn’t quite answer what Nietzsche was
saying in the late 1800s. What Nietzsche meant to launch was not only an assault on a certain religion but
also a suspicion of the idea that there’s one source of final justice for all reality. Nietzsche proposed that
different cultures and people each produce their own moral recommendations and prohibitions, and
there’s no way to indisputably prove that one set is simply and universally preferable to another. The
suspicion that there’s no final appeal—and therefore the values and morality practiced by a community
can’t be dismissed as wrong or inferior to those practiced elsewhere—is called cultural relativism.
Example: For most of us, the killing of a newborn would be among the most heinous of immoral acts; a
perpetrator would need to be purely evil or completely mad. The Inuit Eskimos, however, regularly
practiced female infanticide during their prehistory, and it was neither evil nor insane. Their brutal living
conditions required a population imbalance tipped toward hunters (males). Without that gender
selecting, the plain fact was the entire group faced starvation. At another place and time, Bernal
Diaz’s The Conquest of New Spain recounts the Spanish invasion of the Americas and includes multiple
reports of newborns sacrificed in bloody ceremonies that made perfect sense to the locals, but left
Spaniards astonished and appalle.
Similar to Stupidity: a major obstacle to Lean Management (16)
Tutorial08: Deploying lean principles is imperative in the service industry!Carlo Scodanibbio
"Traditional" Organisations waste resources and dissatisfy customers: the TNM Case.
a Tutorial by Carlo Scodanibbio
Read and download all tutorials published by Carlo Scodanibbio at
https://www.scodanibbio.com/site/tut.html
Entrepreneurs, Managers, wouldn't you like your people to be: responsible - accountable - serious - efficient - dedicated to their work - cost-conscious - committed to quality - actively participating in improving your business processes... in a nutshell: wouldn't you like your people to "perform"?
Yes, you surely would. Every manager worth the title, at any level, would very much like to have collaborators acting, thinking and performing well, a sort of "replica" of himself or herself...
However, in spite of such basic aim, very few managers succeed in the purpose. Actually, the majority of managers believes that getting "performing" people is almost impossible. The majority of managers, when something goes wrong, still uses the universally recognised excuse "...with 'these' people, what do you expect?.....". Rather tragic.
And yet, it is possible to have or create fully performing industrial people!
by Carlo Scodanibbio
https://www.scodanibbio.com
There is a problem in industry: we have gone into the 21st century with enterprises, organisations and business structures conceived and designed in the 18th and 19th centuries to perform well in the 20th...
by Carlo Scodanibbio
https://www.scodanibbio.com
Lean Management: the origins, the principles, the approachCarlo Scodanibbio
Lean Management is primarily an Industrial and Organisational philosophy.
It all started in the era of Just in Time......
by Carlo Scodanibbio
https://www.scodanibbio.com
Lean Kaizen: continuous, step-by-step improvement in the Lean directionCarlo Scodanibbio
The Japanese word kaizen means: continuous, systematic, step-by-step improvement.
The key-words are.........
by Carlo Scodanibbio
https://www.scodanibbio.com
Achieving a "Flow" type of Production is, or at least should be, a prime target for the Manufacturing Industry.
by Carlo Scodanibbio
https://www.scodanibbio.com
Late 2019. The world changed: once more. Dramatically. Irreversibly.
The Corona Virus, or Covid-19, has given an unprecedented spin to this world of ours. This Pandemic has made obsolete almost everything we knew, we believed in, we were used to.
The overall impact of Covid-19 - to date - is immense: scientists, economists, politicians, thinkers, church leaders, philosophers and psychologists (among others) are trying hard to understand, to explain, to foresee, to recommend, to take measures.... it's their duty, or their job, or their passion.
It's not within the scope and style of this web site to add comments or explanations to the billions we hear on a daily basis with regard to Covid-19.
However, it is certainly within the scope of this web site to make suggestions and recommendations to people in Industry about how to tackle the enormous challenges of the years to come.....
by Carlo Scodanibbio
https://www.scodanibbio.com
Specific ServPoints should be tailored for restaurants in all food service segments. Your ServPoints should be the centerpiece of brand delivery training (guest service) and align with your brand position and marketing initiatives, especially in high-labor-cost conditions.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Senior Project and Engineering Leader Jim Smith.pdfJim Smith
I am a Project and Engineering Leader with extensive experience as a Business Operations Leader, Technical Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Experience for Domestic and International companies such as Electrolux, Carrier, and Deutz. I have developed new products using Stage Gate development/MS Project/JIRA, for the pro-duction of Medical Equipment, Large Commercial Refrigeration Systems, Appliances, HVAC, and Diesel engines.
My experience includes:
Managed customized engineered refrigeration system projects with high voltage power panels from quote to ship, coordinating actions between electrical engineering, mechanical design and application engineering, purchasing, production, test, quality assurance and field installation. Managed projects $25k to $1M per project; 4-8 per month. (Hussmann refrigeration)
Successfully developed the $15-20M yearly corporate capital strategy for manufacturing, with the Executive Team and key stakeholders. Created project scope and specifications, business case, ROI, managed project plans with key personnel for nine consumer product manufacturing and distribution sites; to support the company’s strategic sales plan.
Over 15 years of experience managing and developing cost improvement projects with key Stakeholders, site Manufacturing Engineers, Mechanical Engineers, Maintenance, and facility support personnel to optimize pro-duction operations, safety, EHS, and new product development. (BioLab, Deutz, Caire)
Experience working as a Technical Manager developing new products with chemical engineers and packaging engineers to enhance and reduce the cost of retail products. I have led the activities of multiple engineering groups with diverse backgrounds.
Great experience managing the product development of products which utilize complex electrical controls, high voltage power panels, product testing, and commissioning.
Created project scope, business case, ROI for multiple capital projects to support electrotechnical assembly and CPG goods. Identified project cost, risk, success criteria, and performed equipment qualifications. (Carrier, Electrolux, Biolab, Price, Hussmann)
Created detailed projects plans using MS Project, Gant charts in excel, and updated new product development in Jira for stakeholders and project team members including critical path.
Great knowledge of ISO9001, NFPA, OSHA regulations.
User level knowledge of MRP/SAP, MS Project, Powerpoint, Visio, Mastercontrol, JIRA, Power BI and Tableau.
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing this role with you, and how I can lead your company’s growth and profitability. I can be contacted via LinkedIn via phone or E Mail.
Jim Smith
678-993-7195
jimsmith30024@gmail.com
The case study discusses the potential of drone delivery and the challenges that need to be addressed before it becomes widespread.
Key takeaways:
Drone delivery is in its early stages: Amazon's trial in the UK demonstrates the potential for faster deliveries, but it's still limited by regulations and technology.
Regulations are a major hurdle: Safety concerns around drone collisions with airplanes and people have led to restrictions on flight height and location.
Other challenges exist: Who will use drone delivery the most? Is it cost-effective compared to traditional delivery trucks?
Discussion questions:
Managerial challenges: Integrating drones requires planning for new infrastructure, training staff, and navigating regulations. There are also marketing and recruitment considerations specific to this technology.
External forces vary by country: Regulations, consumer acceptance, and infrastructure all differ between countries.
Demographics matter: Younger generations might be more receptive to drone delivery, while older populations might have concerns.
Stakeholders for Amazon: Customers, regulators, aviation authorities, and competitors are all stakeholders. Regulators likely hold the greatest influence as they determine the feasibility of drone delivery.
Comparing Stability and Sustainability in Agile SystemsRob Healy
Copy of the presentation given at XP2024 based on a research paper.
In this paper we explain wat overwork is and the physical and mental health risks associated with it.
We then explore how overwork relates to system stability and inventory.
Finally there is a call to action for Team Leads / Scrum Masters / Managers to measure and monitor excess work for individual teams.
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
Public Speaking Tips to Help You Be A Strong Leader.pdfPinta Partners
In the realm of effective leadership, a multitude of skills come into play, but one stands out as both crucial and challenging: public speaking.
Public speaking transcends mere eloquence; it serves as the medium through which leaders articulate their vision, inspire action, and foster engagement. For leaders, refining public speaking skills is essential, elevating their ability to influence, persuade, and lead with resolute conviction. Here are some key tips to consider: https://joellandau.com/the-public-speaking-tips-to-help-you-be-a-stronger-leader/
2. 2
SSttuuppiiddiittyy:: aa mmaajjoorr oobbssttaaccllee ttoo LLeeaann MMaannaaggeemmeenntt
By Carlo Scodanibbio
So, your company has gone Lean, or is in the process of embarking in lean practices.
Maybe you are a manufacturer and implemented some Lean Manufacturing in your operational
areas…. Or you are a contractor, and are trying to deploy some solid Lean Project Management
and Lean Planning in order to run more efficiently and effectively your contracts…. Or, even
greater, you have decided to restructure your organisation and embark in a company-wide Lean
Management project….. Very positive indeed.
BUT: have you perhaps considered a potentially very serious draw-back capable of jeopardising
and threatening your Lean Project in part or in full? Most definitely NOT.
Your very serious draw-back (and public enemy N. 1) is Stupidity!
Which deserves a comprehensive explanation.
Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.
[Albert Einstein]
HUMAN STUPIDITY
(Shamelessly copied or adapted from CM Cipolla & GF Livraghi – http://gandalf.it)
A subject not well known, not deeply studied, and possibly rather embarrassing. There are
University departments for the mathematical complexities in the movements of Amazonian ants, or
the medieval history of Perim island; but we have never heard of any Foundation or Board of
Trustees supporting any studies of Stupidology.
CIPOLLA’s BASIC LAWS and COROLLARIES
We are surrounded by stupid individuals in our daily life: as Carlo M. Cipolla states in his Stupidity
First Basic Law “Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid
individuals in circulation”.
This Law may sound trivial, pessimistic, and even ungenerous.
It is a fact, however, that:
• many individual whom you had once judged rational and intelligent turn out at times to
be horribly stupid
• and day after day, with unceasing monotony, you are harassed in your activities by
stupid individuals who appear suddenly and unexpectedly in the most inconvenient
places and at the most improbable moments to cause you aggravations, frustration,
stress, hyper-cholesterol and even very serious damages.
Recently, my wife was taking a brisk evening walk on the Marsascala (Malta) promenade. All of a
sudden, she finds herself on the pavement, bleeding considerably from her head, with her shoes
caught in a tangle of fishing line nylon string lying on the pavement. Fortunately, someone passing
by was so kind to help her stopping the bleeding, and rushed her to the nearest Emergency Unit
for treatment.
In spite of the shocking night, the next day in the early morning we drove to the accident place. I
made my investigations. That’s what I discovered:
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
3. 3
Fishing lines solidly tightened to the iron balustrade and bundled within its iron curls. Obviously,
with just a little wind (or even breeze) they will fall on the pavement and constitute a rather serious
hazard to walkers and joggers.
How do you call that? STUPID!
Is there any good reason for leaving those fishing lines there at night? I cannot think of anyone. Is
there any benefit for whoever does that? I cannot think of anyone. And is there any possible loss
that could be incurred by other passing-by pedestrians? Yes, plenty and serious.
This leads to the most important (the Third) Basic Law on Human Stupidity: “A stupid person
is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself
deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses”.
From solid researches I have made, this seems the most appropriate (if not the only) definition of
stupidity.
As Cipolla says: “Our daily life is mostly, made of cases in which we lose money and/or time and/or
energy and/or appetite, cheerfulness and good health because of the improbable action of some
preposterous creature who has nothing to gain and indeed gains nothing from causing us
embarrassment, difficulties or harm. Nobody knows, understands or can possibly explain why that
preposterous creature does what he does. In fact there is no explanation. Or better there is only
one explanation: the person in question is stupid.”
Cipolla (and very few other authors, like GF Livraghi and J Welles) brought some light into the
Stupidity phenomenon: Cipolla also invented the Stupidology Graph.
We all deal with people, we all have human transactions.
Each one of us has a “current” balance with other people. From action or inaction each one of us
derives a GAIN or a LOSS from someone else – likewise, each one of us cause a GAIN or a LOSS
to someone else. GAINS and LOSSES may be accounted for in Dollars or Francs, if one wants.
But one has to include also psychological and emotional rewards and satisfactions (GAINS) as well
as psychological and emotional stresses (LOSSES) [This last type of GAINS and LOSSES are
intangibles and very difficult to measure according to objective standards…].
To clearly determine GAINS and LOSSES, one has to consider the point of view of the recipient of
an action or initiative carried out by someone else!
GAINS and LOSSES consequent to Human Transactions (actions, inaction, decisions, initiatives)
can be conveniently charted on a graph. The acting initiative of an individual may cause:
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
4. 4
The consequences of an individual’s action/s may be plotted on the Stupidity Graph thus
classifying the individual’s 4 main behaviours:
The 4 main human behaviours are rather self-explanatory.
Some individuals act prominently and regularly in an “intelligent” way, producing gains for
themselves and for others.
Some individuals act often or regularly in a “helpless” fashion, causing gains to others and losses
to themselves.
Some individuals act occasionally or regularly as “bandits”, producing gains for themselves but
causing losses to others.
And some individuals act occasional, or regularly or prominently as “stupids”.
The key issue is “consistency”. Most people do not act “consistently”.
Under certain circumstances a certain person acts intelligently and under different circumstances the same person will
act helplessly. And so on.
A Helpless Person may occasionally behave intelligently and on occasion he may perform a bandit's action. But since
the person in question is fundamentally Helpless most of his action will have the characteristics of helplessness. Thus
the overall weighted average position of all the actions of such a person will place him in the Helpless quadrant of the
Stupidology graph.
Likewise, an Intelligent Person may well act stupidly at times, though generally and with consistency acting
intelligently……
People behaviours, therefore, can be “situational”: associated to a “dominant” approach or behaviour, there can be, at
times, some overtones of other approaches/behaviours.
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
5. 5
However, some special considerations have to be made with regard to the BANDIT and the STUPID.
The PERFECT BANDIT is one who, with his actions, causes to other individuals LOSSES equal to his GAINS (if a thief
robs you of 100$, you loose 100$ and he gains 100$).
However the "perfect" bandits are relatively few. Some bandits (also very few) somehow fall in the Bandit area close to
the Intelligent area: they are Intelligent Bandits (a very rare species). Most bandits, in fact, fall in the Bandit area close
to the Stupid area: they are Stupid Bandits (Criminals, cruel Dictators, etc.) who cause to others great losses, far
superior to the gains they yield to themselves.
The frequency distribution of the Stupid People is totally different from that of the Bandit.
Stupid People are heavily concentrated along one
line, specifically on the Y axis below point O.
The reason for this is that by far the majority of Stupid
People are basically and unwaveringly stupid. In
other words, they perseveringly insist in causing harm
and LOSSES to other people without deriving any
GAIN (and also any LOSSES).
There are however people who by their improbable
actions not only cause damages to other people but in
addition hurt themselves.
They are a sort of Super-Stupid who, in the
Stupidology Graph, will appear somewhere in the area
S to the left of the Y axis.
Stupid People vary enormously in their capacity to affect their fellow men: some Stupid People normally cause only
limited LOSSES, while others egregiously succeed in causing ghastly and widespread damages not only to one or two
individuals but to entire communities and societies. Unfortunately, many Stupid people cause enormous damages to
humanity because of their Position of Power (among Bureaucrats, Generals, Politicians and Heads of State one has little
difficulty in finding clear examples of basically-Stupid Individuals whose damaging capacity was - or is - alarmingly
enhanced by the position of power which they occupied/y).
Essentially Stupid People are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it
difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behaviour.
When confronted for the first time with the Third Basic Law, rational people instinctively react with
feelings of scepticism and incredulity. The fact is that reasonable people have difficulty in
conceiving and understanding unreasonable behaviour.
An intelligent person may understand the logic of a Bandit.
The Bandit's actions follow a pattern of rationality: nasty rationality, but still rationality. The Bandit wants a plus on his
account. Since he is not Intelligent enough to devise ways of obtaining the plus as well as providing you with a plus, he
will produce his plus by causing a minus to appear on your account. All this is bad, but it is rational and if you are
rational you can predict it and set-up a line of defence.
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
6. 6
On the other hand, a Stupid Creature will harass you for no reason, for no advantage, without any
plan or scheme and at the most improbable times and places. You have no rational way of telling
if and when and how and why the Stupid Creature attacks. When confronted with a Stupid
Individual you are completely at his mercy: because the Stupid Person's actions do not conform to
the rules of rationality. Hence:
a) one is generally caught by surprise by the attack
b) even when one becomes aware of the attack, one cannot organize a rational defence
because the attack itself lacks any rational structure.
Cipolla’s Third Basic Law corollary: it is absolutely impossible to foresee a Stupid’s
actions.
Cipolla’s Fourth Basic Law: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power
of stupid individuals.
Through centuries and millennia, in public as in private life, countless individuals have failed to take account of the Fourth
Basic Law and the failure has caused mankind incalculable losses.
Cipolla’s Fifth Basic Law: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person
Cipolla’s Fifth Basic Law corollary: A stupid person is more dangerous than a bandit
Livraghi’s Second Corollary: when the Stupidity of one person combines with the Stupidity
of others, the impact grows geometrically - i.e. by multiplication, not addition - of the
individual Stupidity factors.
This explains the well-known fact that crowds as a whole are much more stupid than any individual person in the crowd.
Stupid behaviour and thinking tend to reproduce and multiply so dangerously that the contagion can spread to otherwise
intelligent people when they don’t realize how they are influenced by collective stupidity.
Stupidity, as an aggregate, has more consistency and continuity than other human attitudes.
Livraghi’s Third Corollary: the combination of intelligence in different people is more
difficult than the combination of stupidity.
Stupidity is brainless – it doesn’t need to think, get organized or plan ahead to generate a combined effect.
The transfer and combination of Intelligence is a much more complex and delicate process.
Stupid People can combine instantly into a super-stupid group or mass, while Intelligent People are effective as a group
only when they know each other well, are experienced in working together and share common targets/direction and
operational methods.
The creation of well-tuned groups of people sharing intelligence can generate fairly powerful anti-
stupidity forces, but (unlike stupidity bundling) they need organized planning and upkeep.
…and can lose a large part of their effectiveness by the infiltration of stupid people or unexpected bursts of stupidity in
otherwise intelligent people…
Communities and organizations with a highly-distributed intelligence factor, are likely to have greater opportunities for
long-term survival… …but for this to be effective we must avoid the potentially devastating short term impact of shared
stupidity, which (unfortunately) can cause major damage to large numbers of non-stupid people before it self-destructs…
Another dangerous element in the equation is that the machinery of power tends to place at the top of the pyramid
people who care more about their own advantage (and the interests of restricted groups) than about the well-being of
everyone else – and they, in turn, tend to favour and protect stupidity and keep true intelligence out of their way as much
as they can.
While the power of Stupidity is insidious and dangerous in all its ways, even more harm is
caused by the Stupidity of Power.
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
7. 7
STUPIDITY AND ITS ALLIES
A list of allies, friends and relatives of stupidity would be very long.
Obviously, these attitudes and behaviours combine with each other (and with Stupidity) in
countless ways. The effect tends to multiply rather than just add.
Three very relevant allies of Stupidity are: Ignorance, Fear and Habit.
There seems to be a mutual attraction. Fear can be bred by ignorance – and vice versa. Habit is often the nourishment
(or the excuse) for Ignorance and Stupidity. It isn’t unusual for all four to join forces. And it’s quite obvious that they all
can be (deliberately or not) exploited by whoever has the leverage to do so (Power), but also other people can gain an
advantage from someone else’s Ignorance, Fear, Habit (and even Haste).
There is no direct and linear connection between Ignorance and Stupidity. But when they combine and interact the
result can be awful. Of course, not all Ignorant People are Stupid and not all Stupid People are Ignorant. It’s a common
mistake to confuse Stupidity with Ignorance - they are very different. And so are Intelligence and Knowledge. There
can be very stupid people with lots of “notions” as there can be poorly informed, or scarcely educated, people with a high
level of effective intelligence.
One of the worst forms of Ignorance is the “assumption of knowledge”.
The more I know, the more I know that I don’t know.
[Socrates]
As in the case of stupidity, things get worse when these attitudes (Ignorance, Fear, Habit) are
shared.
Ignorance spreads faster than knowledge. Prejudice and misinformation, as well as ridiculous nonsense, are often taken
as “true” just because they are widely repeated. Fear becomes catastrophic when it’s shared by a “mass”: large numbers
of people in a frenzy of fear (or anger) can be extremely dangerous. Social or group habits often become mindless
obedience, mental slavery, with results ranging from boring monotony to harmful behaviour or serious crime.
There are many other unpleasant “friends” of Stupidity and Ignorance: Arrogance, Presumption,
Egotism, Selfishness, Envy, Carelessness, Servility, Imitation, Gossip, Prejudice, Meanness,
Unwillingness to listen and to understand… etcetera… lurking almost everywhere in human
behaviour and communication.
When we find ways of being a bit less Ignorant, less Scared, less conditioned by Habit, and more
Curious, we have a better chance of being less Stupid – and thus more helpful to other people, as
well as more comfortable with ourselves.
I keep six honest serving-men,
they taught me all I knew.
Their names are What and Why and When,
and How and Where and Who.
[Rudyard Kipling]
STUPIDITY AND LEAN MANAGEMENT
(Fully developed by Carlo Scodanibbio)
Core Concepts and Targets:
• Value. Maximise Core and Support Processes’ output Value
• Waste. While simultaneously eliminating or reducing Processing Waste
Human Stupidity does represent a major obstacle in the achievement of the main Lean targets.
Converting the Stupidology Graph (ex Third Basic Law), into a Lean Stupidology Graph:
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
8. 8
In this graph, besides an individual’s action, we now consider also a “corporate” action (at
Organisation’s management level).
Instead of a “generic” Loss, we now consider a VALUE-LOSS (which may also be pure WASTE).
The consequences of an individual’s or a corporate action/s may be plotted on the Stupidity Graph
thus classifying the 4 main behaviours (of an Organisation or of individuals in an Organisation):
Some remarks:
• VALUE and WASTE are as typically defined by Lean principles.
• VALUE-LOSS means either: insufficient or decreased VALUE (to the Customer and/or
the Organisation) consequent to any form of non-lean processing.
Typical examples: inadequately engineered product/service – unclear definition of requirements – non-
timely responses – and the like.
• In the Intelligent (LEAN) Quadrant fall Lean actions and initiatives (targeting at
maximising value to Customers - and to the Organisation through waste reduction) both
at individual and corporate level.
This applies both to “Traditional” and “Lean” Organisations. Includes all typical Lean Management
initiatives.
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
9. 9
Interesting to note that also “Traditional” Organisations may behave in an Intelligent, Lean fashion, when
they are strongly customer-oriented and customer-focused, and simultaneously try to get organised in an
efficient-as-possible way.
Although the overall results are far from being “lean” (with regard to reduction of “traditional waste”), still the
overall corporate approach falls in the INTELLIGENT quadrant.
• Initiatives targeting at “own” VALUE with simultaneous VALUE-LOSS for the Customer,
or the Organisation (or both), fall in the Bandit Quadrant. These actions may be taken
at Individual or Corporate level.
Individual initiatives include, for example: employees robbing or pilfering – intentional sabotage for own
scope – employees cheating customers for own benefit – etc.
Corporate initiatives’ examples: cheating or defrauding customers (“Shark’s” behaviour) – malicious gossip
about Competitors – etc.
• HELPLESS initiatives are well likely to take place both at Individual or Corporate level
(in both “Traditional” and Lean Organisations). In practice they result in VALUE-LOSS
for the Organisation and benefit for other Stakeholders.
Individual initiatives include, for example: misinterpreting terms and conditions of Clients and Suppliers –
granting special concessions for no reason – managers unable to get collaborators to be productive – etc.
Corporate initiatives’ examples: making excessive concessions, promises, etc. to clients – selecting
unintentionally unreliable or cheating suppliers – granting excessive discounts by mistake – etc.
Closer to the Intelligence side, Helpless initiatives may be undertaken for promotional/marketing reasons
(such as entering a manufacturing contract with a special discount in order to capture a new client).
• STUPID initiatives happen systematically and regularly both at Individual or Corporate
level (in both “Traditional” and Lean Organisations).
Such initiatives may go un-recognised and un-detected (most likely), and only few of
them – in hindsight - will surface and reveal their detrimental impact. All features of
Stupidity apply.
Stupid initiatives generate WASTE, VALUE-LOSS or both: internally and/or externally –
immediately or with a delay – with consequences that are generally overlooked, under-
estimated or ignored…..
MAIN ITEMS OF STUPIDITY IN “TRADITIONAL” ORGANISATIONS
An interesting, shocking, initial observation is that all main items of WASTE – as well Illustrated by
Lean Management – are somehow caused, directly or indirectly, by sheer Stupidity and/or by its
Allies.
In traditional Organisations, WASTE exists, persists and proliferates because:
• IGNORANCE: of Lean Methods and their potential
• Management ARROGANCE: “…we know too well how things must be organised…”
• HABIT: “…we’ve been doing so well, so long in this way…”
• FEAR: of changing, of trying and testing new avenues, of making mistakes…
• Desperate need to CONTROL (a by-product of POWER…)
In traditional Organisations, VALUE-LOSS materialises as:
• MISSED PROFITS: consequent to poor overall processing Productivity
• Missed OPPORTUNITIES: consequent to lack of magnification of VALUE to Customers
– and of unexploited internal, Human potential
• Missed COMPETIVENESS: consequent to inadequate, output VALUE components
(Time, Quality, Service….)
• Excessive COSTS: associated with Bureaucracy - Control - mis-management - paleo-
management - elephant-type structure - hastily decisions in boom times - hastily, wrong
decisions in recessive times…
What is this, if not pure Stupidity, with all its Allies and Relatives in action?
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
10. 10
MAIN ITEMS OF STUPIDITY IN LEANER ORGANISATIONS
Unfortunately, Organisations “leaner” than “traditional” ones or gradually moving to leaner status
are not exempt from the plague of Stupidity.
To begin with, phenomena of WASTE and VALUE-LOSS are still present, even if some strong
actions to reduce / eliminate them are being undertaken.
BUT: this is not stupid at all! A very substantial difference is that, in a Leaner Organisation, Waste and Value-Loss
awareness is much greater than in a traditional Organisation. Moreover, Intelligent initiatives are being taken!
However, while advancing in the Lean road, novel, never-seen-before items of Stupidity may
surface!
• RESISTANCE and RELUCTANCE to begin with! The “old” DNA is still alive and
kicking, and may show up at the most unlikely and inconvenient time up with a novel,
unseen before, disguise (especially with regard to “traditional” managers).
• Even the most convinced and lean-fanatic Top Managers are not exempt from stupid
initiatives during a Lean Transition!
• Likewise, key employees will reveal their “never-seen-before” Resistance/Reluctance –
in spite of their fully declared love for Lean practices – by coming up with the entire
dictionary of excuses (“I forgot” – “I had no time” – “I was too busy” – “I thought it was
not up to me” – “I got no instruction in this regard” – etc.).
Therefore, the Leaner Organisation now faces a new challenge. Besides fighting hard to introduce
Lean methods, a new, major task is assigned to top Lean drivers: “identify the Stupid Persons in
the Organisation and take actions to counterbalance or mitigate their destructive force”.
While assuming that in an Organisation going Lean there are remarkable clusters of built-up
Intelligence (active and involved Lean Project Teams) it is a fact that a fraction Σ of Stupid Persons
still exists and acts within the Organisation, ready to strike at the most unpredictable time.
SOME HINTS & TIPS TO FIGHT STUPIDITY (LEANER COMPANIES)
• Identify STUPID BANDITS, if any, and get rid of them as fast as possible
• INTELLIGENT BANDITS, with overtones of Intelligence, may instead be very valid
Personnel, especially in Sales, Marketing, PR, etc.
• Identify HELPLESS People and classify them. H1 persons (closer to the Intelligent
quadrant) can be made grow through dedicated training. H2 persons (closer to the
Stupid quadrant) constitute a big question mark…
• Identify STUPID Persons (by observing their behaviour with great attention) – classify
them. Most probably, in a modern, Leaner Organisation, there will be neither Super-
Stupid Persons nor predominant-Stupid Persons. There will rather be some
Helpless Persons with overtones of Stupidity, as well as many Intelligent People with
“frequent” or “substantial” overflows of Stupidity.
The issue is how “frequent” (recurring) and how “substantial” (intensity) are these episodes of Stupidity!
• Pay great attention to any Bureaucrat’s approach! Most probably, behind a
Bureaucrat, there is an overtone of Stupidity (acting frequently and systematically).
• Pay great attention to any excessive or intensive CONTROL-driven approach. What
sits behind it is probably a Paleo-Manager mentality (maybe associated with some
tendency to Bureaucracy and/or – even worse – some inclination to POWER or
Autocracy): anyhow, some Stupidity is present.
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
11. 11
• Pay great attention to “failures” of any sort, analysing them systematically with the
5Why tool. High % of similar failures are probably caused by some stupid action hidden
behind complex processes.
• Investigate closely any recurring episodes of “missed deadlines” (the classic excuse
being “because too busy”). Here there is a signal of non-intelligence (since skipping
deadlines is originated by inadequate planning). So, if it is not “sabotage”, it’s stupidity
in action.
• A Lean Project Team represents an “INTELLIGENCE-CLUSTER”. Build up as many of
them as possible (Teams and sub-Teams) and request performance in the form of Lean
Improvements. Built-up Intelligence is the best antidote to Stupidity!
• Likewise, stimulate Creative Thinking company-wide. Stir-up troubles, intentionally if
necessary, and provoke thinking. People busy thinking creatively have less time to fall
into Stupidity traps!
• Pay great attention to “non-listeners” or “excessive-talkers”: because behind it…
• Stimulate Curiosity, and create a “Learning” environment. Observe: who falls behind?
• Cut “Complexity” to its roots and beneath, and request exasperate “Simplicity” at all
times. Observe: who falls behind?
• INTELLIGENT MISTAKES MANAGEMENT!! The Lean road is full of mistakes, of trial-
and-error initiatives, and possibly of some failed Pilot Projects. THIS MAY HAPPEN…
What is vital, is to learn from Mistakes of any sort and magnitude. Actually, making
some deliberate mistake through a “CONTROLLED-RISK” approach (Controlled Risk =
the risk associated with the consequences of a failure cannot be greater than…) is a
LEAN behaviour!
• Be extremely careful when entering into agreements or anyhow associating with
Stupid Employees of your Clients or your Suppliers. Traditional Organisations may
have a massive amount of Stupid Employees (according to the STUPIDITY OF
POWER Corollaries): dealing with them may prove nefarious!
• Under this angle of view, it might be wise to conduct a “stupidology analysis” of key
representatives of your service providers, clients, suppliers, associates, etc.
• Last (actually: first), if you are a Manager or a Top Manager, please do some regular
“stupidology analysis” of your own actions, decisions and initiatives. Knowing your
own stupid behaviours may represent the starting point of fighting more effectively any
form of Stupidity within your Organisation…
GOOD LUCK!!!
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
12. 12
He has co-operated, inter-alia, with the Cyprus Chamber of Commerce, the Cyprus
Productivity Centre, the Malta Federation of Industry, the Mauritius Employers'
Federation, the Romanian Paper Industry Association, the United Nations Industrial
Development Organisation and the University of Cape Town.
His courses and seminars, conducted in English, Italian and French, have been attended by
well over 20.000 Entrepreneurs, Managers, Supervisors and Workers. They feature a very
high level of interaction, and are rich in simulations, exercising and real case studies.
The approach is invariably "hands-on" and addressed to immediate, practical application.
This paper is freely distributed through https://www.scodanibbio.com . You may publish this article in your web site/s
or distribute it for free as long as you are not changing any content or any links or any other details. If you wish to
publish or distribute this article on your web site/s you have to link back to https://www.scodanibbio.com - just copy
and paste this code in your site, in the same page in which this paper is going to be published:
<a href=”https://www.scodanibbio.com” title=”Carlo Scodanibbio – Industrial and Business Consultant – Lean
Management Consultant”>by Carlo Scodanibbio, Lean Management Consultant</a>
STUPIDITY: A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO LEAN MANAGEMENT
https://www.scodanibbio.com
Carlo Scodanibbio, born in Macerata (Italy) in 1944, holds
an Italian doctor degree in Electrical Engineering
(Politecnico di Milano - 1970).
He has over 49 years of experience in Plant Engineering,
Project Engineering and Project Management, as well as
Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.
Free-lance Consultant since 1979, he has worked in a wide
spectrum of companies and industries in many countries
(Southern Africa - Italy - Cape Verde - Romania - Malta -
Cyprus - Lebanon - Mauritius - Malaysia - Kenya - India -
Saudi Arabia), and operates as an Independent Professional
Consultant and Human Resources Trainer to industry.
His area of intervention is: World Class Performance for
Small and Medium Enterprises in the Project,
Manufacturing, and Service sectors.
His favourite area of action is: the "lean" area.