This document provides a structural design of a four-storey reinforced concrete office building in Auckland. It analyzes the building's frame, determines member sizes, calculates actions from gravity and earthquake loads, analyzes the structure, and designs critical beams and columns. The design considers New Zealand standards for concrete structures and structural design actions. Key steps include determining permanent and imposed loadings, analyzing bending moments, shear forces, and axial loads, and designing reinforcement for beams and columns to satisfy strength and serviceability requirements.
This document provides design aids for reinforced concrete structures based on Indian Standard IS: 456-1978 Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
The design aids cover material strength and stress-strain relationships, flexural members, compression members, shear and torsion, development length and anchorage, working stress design, deflection calculation, and general tables. Charts and tables are provided for preliminary and final design of beams, slabs, and columns. Assumptions made in developing the design aids are explained. An example illustrates the use of the design aids. Important points regarding the use and limitations of the charts and tables are noted.
The design aids were prepared based on examination of international handbooks and consultation with Indian
1) Two-way slabs are slabs that require reinforcement in two directions because bending occurs in both the longitudinal and transverse directions when the ratio of longest span to shortest span is less than 2.
2) The document discusses various types of two-way slabs and design methods, focusing on the direct design method (DDM).
3) Using the DDM, the total factored load is first calculated, then the total factored moment is distributed to positive and negative moments. The moments are further distributed to column and middle strips using factors that consider the slab and beam properties.
This document discusses the design of two-way floor slab systems. It compares the behavior of one-way and two-way slabs, describing how two-way slabs carry load in two directions versus one direction for one-way slabs. Different two-way slab systems like flat plates, waffle slabs, and ribbed slabs are described. Methods for analyzing two-way slabs include direct design, equivalent frame, elastic, plastic, and nonlinear analysis. Design considerations like minimum slab thickness are discussed along with examples calculating thickness.
This document provides an introduction to prestressed concrete, including:
1. The basic principles of prestressing concrete by applying compressive stresses that counteract tensile stresses from loads. This allows for smaller member sizes.
2. The main advantages are smaller sections, reduced deflections, increased spans, and improved durability due to reduced cracking.
3. The two main methods are pre-tensioning, where strands are stressed before casting, and post-tensioning, where strands are tensioned after casting through ducts.
4. Uses include precast beams, slabs, piles, tanks, and bridges constructed with either precast or post-tensioned segments.
The document summarizes the load distribution calculation for a one-way slab. It provides the given data for the slab, beam, and column dimensions. It then calculates the dead and live loads on the slab based on the self-weight and imposed live loads. The loads are then calculated as they are distributed from the slab to the beams, from the beams to the columns, and finally from the columns to the footing. Equations and diagrams are provided at each step to demonstrate how the loads are calculated and distributed throughout the one-way slab structural system.
1) The document discusses design considerations for columns according to ACI code, including requirements for different types of columns like tied, spirally reinforced, and composite columns.
2) It provides details on failure modes of tied and spiral columns and code requirements for minimum reinforcement ratios, number of bars, clear spacing, cover, and cross sectional dimensions.
3) Lateral reinforcement requirements are discussed, noting ties help restrain longitudinal bars from buckling while spirals provide additional confinement at ultimate load.
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...Make Mannan
Â
A 1m wide strip footing is located 0.8m below ground in a c-Ï soil. The soil properties are given. Using Terzaghi's analysis with a factor of safety of 3, the safe bearing capacity is calculated to be 112.1 kN/m^2.
A 2m x 3m rectangular footing at a depth of 1.5m in a different c-Ï soil is considered. Using Terzaghi's analysis, the safe bearing capacities are calculated to be 471.7 kN/m^2 based on net ultimate capacity and 453.7 kN/m^2 based on ultimate capacity, both with a factor of safety of 3.
This document provides an overview of Indian Standard IS: 3370 (Part II) - 1965, which establishes guidelines for reinforced concrete structures used for liquid storage. It discusses the code's scope and general requirements. Key points include:
- The code provides uniform design and construction standards for liquid storage structures built with reinforced concrete.
- It addresses the assessment of loads, stresses, and statical equilibrium to ensure structural safety and prevent overturning.
- Design provisions are given for resistance to cracking and adequate strength based on permissible concrete and steel stresses.
- The code specifies stress limits for reinforced concrete elements in direct contact with stored liquids.
This document provides design aids for reinforced concrete structures based on Indian Standard IS: 456-1978 Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
The design aids cover material strength and stress-strain relationships, flexural members, compression members, shear and torsion, development length and anchorage, working stress design, deflection calculation, and general tables. Charts and tables are provided for preliminary and final design of beams, slabs, and columns. Assumptions made in developing the design aids are explained. An example illustrates the use of the design aids. Important points regarding the use and limitations of the charts and tables are noted.
The design aids were prepared based on examination of international handbooks and consultation with Indian
1) Two-way slabs are slabs that require reinforcement in two directions because bending occurs in both the longitudinal and transverse directions when the ratio of longest span to shortest span is less than 2.
2) The document discusses various types of two-way slabs and design methods, focusing on the direct design method (DDM).
3) Using the DDM, the total factored load is first calculated, then the total factored moment is distributed to positive and negative moments. The moments are further distributed to column and middle strips using factors that consider the slab and beam properties.
This document discusses the design of two-way floor slab systems. It compares the behavior of one-way and two-way slabs, describing how two-way slabs carry load in two directions versus one direction for one-way slabs. Different two-way slab systems like flat plates, waffle slabs, and ribbed slabs are described. Methods for analyzing two-way slabs include direct design, equivalent frame, elastic, plastic, and nonlinear analysis. Design considerations like minimum slab thickness are discussed along with examples calculating thickness.
This document provides an introduction to prestressed concrete, including:
1. The basic principles of prestressing concrete by applying compressive stresses that counteract tensile stresses from loads. This allows for smaller member sizes.
2. The main advantages are smaller sections, reduced deflections, increased spans, and improved durability due to reduced cracking.
3. The two main methods are pre-tensioning, where strands are stressed before casting, and post-tensioning, where strands are tensioned after casting through ducts.
4. Uses include precast beams, slabs, piles, tanks, and bridges constructed with either precast or post-tensioned segments.
The document summarizes the load distribution calculation for a one-way slab. It provides the given data for the slab, beam, and column dimensions. It then calculates the dead and live loads on the slab based on the self-weight and imposed live loads. The loads are then calculated as they are distributed from the slab to the beams, from the beams to the columns, and finally from the columns to the footing. Equations and diagrams are provided at each step to demonstrate how the loads are calculated and distributed throughout the one-way slab structural system.
1) The document discusses design considerations for columns according to ACI code, including requirements for different types of columns like tied, spirally reinforced, and composite columns.
2) It provides details on failure modes of tied and spiral columns and code requirements for minimum reinforcement ratios, number of bars, clear spacing, cover, and cross sectional dimensions.
3) Lateral reinforcement requirements are discussed, noting ties help restrain longitudinal bars from buckling while spirals provide additional confinement at ultimate load.
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...Make Mannan
Â
A 1m wide strip footing is located 0.8m below ground in a c-Ï soil. The soil properties are given. Using Terzaghi's analysis with a factor of safety of 3, the safe bearing capacity is calculated to be 112.1 kN/m^2.
A 2m x 3m rectangular footing at a depth of 1.5m in a different c-Ï soil is considered. Using Terzaghi's analysis, the safe bearing capacities are calculated to be 471.7 kN/m^2 based on net ultimate capacity and 453.7 kN/m^2 based on ultimate capacity, both with a factor of safety of 3.
This document provides an overview of Indian Standard IS: 3370 (Part II) - 1965, which establishes guidelines for reinforced concrete structures used for liquid storage. It discusses the code's scope and general requirements. Key points include:
- The code provides uniform design and construction standards for liquid storage structures built with reinforced concrete.
- It addresses the assessment of loads, stresses, and statical equilibrium to ensure structural safety and prevent overturning.
- Design provisions are given for resistance to cracking and adequate strength based on permissible concrete and steel stresses.
- The code specifies stress limits for reinforced concrete elements in direct contact with stored liquids.
The document discusses properties and testing of concrete. It provides information on the constituents of concrete including cement, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and water. It also discusses properties of concrete and reinforcements, including their relatively high compressive strength and lower tensile strength. Various tests performed on concrete are mentioned, including tests on workability, compressive strength, flexural strength, and fresh/hardened concrete. Design philosophies for reinforced concrete include the working stress method, ultimate strength method, and limit state method.
Design of concrete structures-Nilson-15th-EditionBahzad5
Â
DESIGN of
CONCRETE
STRUCTURES
Fifteenth Edition
David Darwin
Ph.D., P.E., Distinguished Member of ASCE
Fellow of ACI, Fellow of SEI
Deane E. Ackers Distinguished Professor and Chair
of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering
University of Kansas
Charles W. Dolan
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of PCI
H. T. Person Professor of Engineering, Emeritus
University of Wyoming
Arthur H. Nilson
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of ASCE
Late Professor of Structural Engineering
Cornell University
Erbil Polytechnic University
Erbil Technical Engineering College
#Reinforced Concrete.
Shear Force And Bending Moment Diagram For FramesAmr Hamed
Â
This document discusses analyzing shear and moment diagrams for frames. It provides procedures for determining reactions, axial forces, shear forces, and moments at member ends. Examples are given of drawing shear and moment diagrams for simple frames with different joint conditions, including pin and roller supports. Diagrams for a three-pin frame example are shown.
This document provides an overview of reinforced concrete design principles for civil engineers and construction managers. It discusses the aim of structural design according to BS 8110, describes the properties and composite action of reinforced concrete, explains limit state design methodology, and summarizes key elements like slabs, beams, columns, walls, and foundations. The document also covers material properties, stress-strain curves, failure modes, and general procedures for slab sizing and design.
Slabs are structural members that support transverse loads and transfer them to supports via bending. They are commonly used as floors and roofs. One-way slabs bend in only one direction across the shorter span like a wide beam, while two-way slabs bend in both directions if the ratio of longer to shorter span is less than or equal to 2. Design of one-way slabs involves calculating bending moment and shear force, selecting reinforcement ratio and bar size, and checking deflection, shear, and development length.
information on types of beams, different methods to calculate beam stress, design for shear, analysis for SRB flexure, design for flexure, Design procedure for doubly reinforced beam,
This document is a structural design report for a proposed residential building in Kirtipur, Nepal. It provides details on the structural system, materials, design codes followed, load calculations, structural dimensions, analysis, and design procedures. The building will be a 3.5 story ductile moment resisting frame structure with reinforced concrete beams, columns, slabs, and footings. Load calculations are provided for dead and live loads according to Nepalese codes. Analysis was conducted using ETABS software to calculate member forces and design seismic loads. The report concludes with sample output data from the structural analysis.
This document describes the design of a pile cap by a group of civil engineering students. It defines a pile cap as a concrete mat that rests on piles driven into soft ground to provide a stable foundation. It then provides two examples of pile cap design, showing dimensions, load calculations, reinforcement requirements and construction details. The document concludes that a pile cap distributes a building's load to piles to form a stable foundation on unstable soil. It acknowledges the guidance of professors in completing this project.
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...Hossam Shafiq II
Â
1) T-beams are commonly used structural elements that can take two forms: isolated precast T-beams or T-beams formed by the interaction of slabs and beams in buildings.
2) The analysis and design of T-beams considers the effective flange width provided by slab interaction or the dimensions of an isolated precast flange.
3) Two methods are used to analyze T-beams: assuming the stress block is in the flange and using rectangular beam theory, or using a decomposition method if the stress block extends into the web.
This document discusses different types of retaining walls and their design considerations. It describes:
1. Gravity, cantilever, counterfort, and buttress retaining wall types based on their structural components and typical height ranges.
2. Design considerations for retaining walls including stability against overturning, sliding, and settlement; drainage; and structural design basis using load and safety factors.
3. An example problem showing calculations for earth pressure, restoring moments, and checking stability of a gravity wall.
The document discusses the reinforcement requirements and design process for axially loaded columns. It provides guidelines on the minimum longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, including the pitch and diameter of lateral ties. Examples are given to calculate the ultimate load capacity of rectangular and circular columns based on the grade of concrete and steel. Design assumptions and checks for minimum eccentricity are also outlined.
This document provides an overview of design in reinforced concrete according to BS 8110. It discusses the basic materials used - concrete and steel reinforcement - and their properties. It describes two limit states for design: ultimate limit state considering failure, and serviceability limit state considering deflection and cracking. Key aspects of beam design are summarized, including types of beams, design for bending and shear resistance, and limiting deflection. Reinforcement detailing rules are also briefly covered.
Design of steel structure as per is 800(2007)ahsanrabbani
Â
It does not offer resistance against rotation and also termed as a hinged or pinned connections.
It transfers only axial or shear forces and it is not designed for moment
It is generally connected by single bolt/rivet and therefore full rotation is allowed
This document discusses the design of beams. It defines different types of beams like floor beams, girders, lintels, purlins, and rafters. It describes how beams are classified based on their support conditions as simply supported, cantilever, fixed, or continuous beams. Commonly used beam sections include universal beams, compound beams, and composite beams. The document also covers plastic analysis of beams, classification of beam sections, and failure modes of beams.
Prestress loss occurs as prestress reduces over time from its initial applied value. There are two types of prestress loss - immediate losses during prestressing/transfer and long-term time-dependent losses. Immediate losses include elastic shortening, anchorage slip, and friction. Long-term losses include creep and shrinkage of concrete and relaxation of prestressing steel. The quantification of losses is based on strain compatibility between concrete and steel. For a pre-tensioned concrete sleeper, the percentage loss due to elastic shortening was calculated to be approximately 2.83% based on the stress in concrete at the level of the tendons.
This document discusses the design of compression members subjected to axial load and biaxial bending. It introduces the concept of biaxial eccentricities and explains that columns should be designed considering possible eccentricities in two axes. The document outlines the method suggested by IS 456-2000, which is based on Breslar's load contour approach. It relates the parameter αn to the ratio of Pu/Puz. Finally, it provides a step-by-step process for designing the column section, which involves determining uniaxial moment capacities, computing permissible moment values from charts, and revising the section if needed. It also briefly mentions the simplified method according to BS8110.
The document provides details on the design of a reinforced concrete column footing to support a column load of 1100kN from a 400mm square column. It describes the design process which includes determining the footing size, calculating bending moment, reinforcement requirements, checking shear capacity and development length. The design example shows a 3.5m x 3.5m square footing with 12mm diameter bars at 100mm c/c is adequate to support the given load based on the specified material properties and design codes. Reinforcement and footing details are also provided.
This document provides information on designing and detailing steel reinforcement in combined footings. It begins by defining a combined footing as a single spread footing that supports two or more columns in a straight line. It then discusses types of combined footings and provides steps for their design including proportioning the footing size, calculating shear forces and bending moments, and designing the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. The document concludes by providing an example problem demonstrating how to design a combined footing with a central beam.
A group of 16 square piles extends 12 m into stiff clay soil, underlain by rock at 24 m depth. Pile dimensions are 0.3 m x 0.3 m. Undrained shear strength of clay increases linearly from 50 kPa at surface to 150 kPa at rock. Factor of safety for group capacity is 2.5. Determine group capacity and individual pile capacity.
The group capacity is calculated to be 1600 kN. The individual pile capacity is determined to be 100 kN. The factor of safety of 2.5 is then applied to determine the safe load capacity.
The document provides derivations of design equations for reinforced concrete beams. It begins by deriving the equation for maximum moment capacity of a singly reinforced beam based on concrete strength as M=0.167*fck*b*d^2. It then derives equations for doubly reinforced beams where compression steel is also required. The document further derives equations for design of flanged beams depending on whether the neutral axis lies within the flange or web. It concludes by outlining design procedures for singly and doubly reinforced beams.
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PROAli Meer
Â
This document discusses the design and analysis of a multi-storied residential building using STAAD Pro software. It includes details on the building specifications, applicable codes, loads on the structure, and the design of structural elements like slabs, beams, columns, and footings. The analysis involves assigning materials, loads, properties and performing RCC design in STAAD Pro to verify the safety and serviceability of the building according to codes. The results show the design is safe and meets code requirements. References include design codes and textbooks.
This document provides an analysis and design of the structural elements for a multi-storey residential building, including slabs, columns, shear walls, and foundations. It discusses the objectives, general approach, types of buildings and concrete mixtures used. The structural elements are then analyzed and designed according to the given specifications and loadings, with reinforcement details provided for slabs, columns, shear walls, and pile caps.
The document discusses properties and testing of concrete. It provides information on the constituents of concrete including cement, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and water. It also discusses properties of concrete and reinforcements, including their relatively high compressive strength and lower tensile strength. Various tests performed on concrete are mentioned, including tests on workability, compressive strength, flexural strength, and fresh/hardened concrete. Design philosophies for reinforced concrete include the working stress method, ultimate strength method, and limit state method.
Design of concrete structures-Nilson-15th-EditionBahzad5
Â
DESIGN of
CONCRETE
STRUCTURES
Fifteenth Edition
David Darwin
Ph.D., P.E., Distinguished Member of ASCE
Fellow of ACI, Fellow of SEI
Deane E. Ackers Distinguished Professor and Chair
of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering
University of Kansas
Charles W. Dolan
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of PCI
H. T. Person Professor of Engineering, Emeritus
University of Wyoming
Arthur H. Nilson
Ph.D., P.E., Honorary Member of ACI
Fellow of ASCE
Late Professor of Structural Engineering
Cornell University
Erbil Polytechnic University
Erbil Technical Engineering College
#Reinforced Concrete.
Shear Force And Bending Moment Diagram For FramesAmr Hamed
Â
This document discusses analyzing shear and moment diagrams for frames. It provides procedures for determining reactions, axial forces, shear forces, and moments at member ends. Examples are given of drawing shear and moment diagrams for simple frames with different joint conditions, including pin and roller supports. Diagrams for a three-pin frame example are shown.
This document provides an overview of reinforced concrete design principles for civil engineers and construction managers. It discusses the aim of structural design according to BS 8110, describes the properties and composite action of reinforced concrete, explains limit state design methodology, and summarizes key elements like slabs, beams, columns, walls, and foundations. The document also covers material properties, stress-strain curves, failure modes, and general procedures for slab sizing and design.
Slabs are structural members that support transverse loads and transfer them to supports via bending. They are commonly used as floors and roofs. One-way slabs bend in only one direction across the shorter span like a wide beam, while two-way slabs bend in both directions if the ratio of longer to shorter span is less than or equal to 2. Design of one-way slabs involves calculating bending moment and shear force, selecting reinforcement ratio and bar size, and checking deflection, shear, and development length.
information on types of beams, different methods to calculate beam stress, design for shear, analysis for SRB flexure, design for flexure, Design procedure for doubly reinforced beam,
This document is a structural design report for a proposed residential building in Kirtipur, Nepal. It provides details on the structural system, materials, design codes followed, load calculations, structural dimensions, analysis, and design procedures. The building will be a 3.5 story ductile moment resisting frame structure with reinforced concrete beams, columns, slabs, and footings. Load calculations are provided for dead and live loads according to Nepalese codes. Analysis was conducted using ETABS software to calculate member forces and design seismic loads. The report concludes with sample output data from the structural analysis.
This document describes the design of a pile cap by a group of civil engineering students. It defines a pile cap as a concrete mat that rests on piles driven into soft ground to provide a stable foundation. It then provides two examples of pile cap design, showing dimensions, load calculations, reinforcement requirements and construction details. The document concludes that a pile cap distributes a building's load to piles to form a stable foundation on unstable soil. It acknowledges the guidance of professors in completing this project.
Lec06 Analysis and Design of T Beams (Reinforced Concrete Design I & Prof. Ab...Hossam Shafiq II
Â
1) T-beams are commonly used structural elements that can take two forms: isolated precast T-beams or T-beams formed by the interaction of slabs and beams in buildings.
2) The analysis and design of T-beams considers the effective flange width provided by slab interaction or the dimensions of an isolated precast flange.
3) Two methods are used to analyze T-beams: assuming the stress block is in the flange and using rectangular beam theory, or using a decomposition method if the stress block extends into the web.
This document discusses different types of retaining walls and their design considerations. It describes:
1. Gravity, cantilever, counterfort, and buttress retaining wall types based on their structural components and typical height ranges.
2. Design considerations for retaining walls including stability against overturning, sliding, and settlement; drainage; and structural design basis using load and safety factors.
3. An example problem showing calculations for earth pressure, restoring moments, and checking stability of a gravity wall.
The document discusses the reinforcement requirements and design process for axially loaded columns. It provides guidelines on the minimum longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, including the pitch and diameter of lateral ties. Examples are given to calculate the ultimate load capacity of rectangular and circular columns based on the grade of concrete and steel. Design assumptions and checks for minimum eccentricity are also outlined.
This document provides an overview of design in reinforced concrete according to BS 8110. It discusses the basic materials used - concrete and steel reinforcement - and their properties. It describes two limit states for design: ultimate limit state considering failure, and serviceability limit state considering deflection and cracking. Key aspects of beam design are summarized, including types of beams, design for bending and shear resistance, and limiting deflection. Reinforcement detailing rules are also briefly covered.
Design of steel structure as per is 800(2007)ahsanrabbani
Â
It does not offer resistance against rotation and also termed as a hinged or pinned connections.
It transfers only axial or shear forces and it is not designed for moment
It is generally connected by single bolt/rivet and therefore full rotation is allowed
This document discusses the design of beams. It defines different types of beams like floor beams, girders, lintels, purlins, and rafters. It describes how beams are classified based on their support conditions as simply supported, cantilever, fixed, or continuous beams. Commonly used beam sections include universal beams, compound beams, and composite beams. The document also covers plastic analysis of beams, classification of beam sections, and failure modes of beams.
Prestress loss occurs as prestress reduces over time from its initial applied value. There are two types of prestress loss - immediate losses during prestressing/transfer and long-term time-dependent losses. Immediate losses include elastic shortening, anchorage slip, and friction. Long-term losses include creep and shrinkage of concrete and relaxation of prestressing steel. The quantification of losses is based on strain compatibility between concrete and steel. For a pre-tensioned concrete sleeper, the percentage loss due to elastic shortening was calculated to be approximately 2.83% based on the stress in concrete at the level of the tendons.
This document discusses the design of compression members subjected to axial load and biaxial bending. It introduces the concept of biaxial eccentricities and explains that columns should be designed considering possible eccentricities in two axes. The document outlines the method suggested by IS 456-2000, which is based on Breslar's load contour approach. It relates the parameter αn to the ratio of Pu/Puz. Finally, it provides a step-by-step process for designing the column section, which involves determining uniaxial moment capacities, computing permissible moment values from charts, and revising the section if needed. It also briefly mentions the simplified method according to BS8110.
The document provides details on the design of a reinforced concrete column footing to support a column load of 1100kN from a 400mm square column. It describes the design process which includes determining the footing size, calculating bending moment, reinforcement requirements, checking shear capacity and development length. The design example shows a 3.5m x 3.5m square footing with 12mm diameter bars at 100mm c/c is adequate to support the given load based on the specified material properties and design codes. Reinforcement and footing details are also provided.
This document provides information on designing and detailing steel reinforcement in combined footings. It begins by defining a combined footing as a single spread footing that supports two or more columns in a straight line. It then discusses types of combined footings and provides steps for their design including proportioning the footing size, calculating shear forces and bending moments, and designing the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. The document concludes by providing an example problem demonstrating how to design a combined footing with a central beam.
A group of 16 square piles extends 12 m into stiff clay soil, underlain by rock at 24 m depth. Pile dimensions are 0.3 m x 0.3 m. Undrained shear strength of clay increases linearly from 50 kPa at surface to 150 kPa at rock. Factor of safety for group capacity is 2.5. Determine group capacity and individual pile capacity.
The group capacity is calculated to be 1600 kN. The individual pile capacity is determined to be 100 kN. The factor of safety of 2.5 is then applied to determine the safe load capacity.
The document provides derivations of design equations for reinforced concrete beams. It begins by deriving the equation for maximum moment capacity of a singly reinforced beam based on concrete strength as M=0.167*fck*b*d^2. It then derives equations for doubly reinforced beams where compression steel is also required. The document further derives equations for design of flanged beams depending on whether the neutral axis lies within the flange or web. It concludes by outlining design procedures for singly and doubly reinforced beams.
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PROAli Meer
Â
This document discusses the design and analysis of a multi-storied residential building using STAAD Pro software. It includes details on the building specifications, applicable codes, loads on the structure, and the design of structural elements like slabs, beams, columns, and footings. The analysis involves assigning materials, loads, properties and performing RCC design in STAAD Pro to verify the safety and serviceability of the building according to codes. The results show the design is safe and meets code requirements. References include design codes and textbooks.
This document provides an analysis and design of the structural elements for a multi-storey residential building, including slabs, columns, shear walls, and foundations. It discusses the objectives, general approach, types of buildings and concrete mixtures used. The structural elements are then analyzed and designed according to the given specifications and loadings, with reinforcement details provided for slabs, columns, shear walls, and pile caps.
Structural analysis and design of multi storey pptSHIVUNAIKA B
Â
This document summarizes the structural analysis and design of a multi-story residential building. The objectives were to gain experience designing such structures for economy, safety and durability. The process involved locating columns and beams, calculating loads, modeling the structure in STAAD.Pro, analyzing results, and designing various components including the foundation, columns, beams, and slabs according to the Indian code IS 456:2000. Load combinations, material properties, and reinforcement sizing were considered to satisfy strength and serviceability limit states.
This document provides an analysis and design of a G+3 residential building. It includes details of the building such as dimensions, material properties, and load calculations. An equivalent static analysis is performed to calculate the seismic lateral loads at each floor level. The results of the structural analysis including bending moment and shear force diagrams are presented. Slab, beam, column and footing designs are to be covered in the thesis work according to the scope.
Building codes govern the design and construction of buildings to ensure safety and establish standards. Codes have existed for millennia and are updated regularly to reflect advances in technology and materials. The modern building code focuses on occupancy classifications, fire prevention, structural integrity, accessibility, and other life safety issues. Architects and engineers use the building code throughout the design process to ensure their designs meet all applicable requirements.
1. The document introduces reinforced concrete structures and provides an overview of their design process. It discusses common building elements like beams, slabs, columns, and foundations.
2. The design process involves analyzing loads, selecting an efficient structural form, evaluating safety, and planning construction. Designs must consider strength, serviceability, and safety factors.
3. Reinforced concrete is designed using limit state theory according to code BS 8110. Designs consider ultimate and serviceability limit states, and evaluate different load combinations and factors of safety.
This document provides details of the structural analysis and design of a commercial and residential building using STAAD.Pro, AutoCAD, and STAAD.Foundation software. The building is located in Trivandrum, Kerala and consists of a basement, ground plus three floors. The document describes the site details, building plans, load calculations, modeling in STAAD.Pro, design of structural elements like beams, columns, foundation, and reinforcement details. Pile foundation is adopted based on the bore log details. The analysis helps gain knowledge of designing various components using structural analysis and design software.
This document provides an overview of multistory building design and analysis. It discusses reinforced concrete multistory buildings consisting of slabs, beams, girders and columns forming a rigid monolithic system. It also describes how multistory buildings can be modeled as three-dimensional space frames and analyzed independently in two perpendicular horizontal axes. Finally, it covers various structural analysis methods that can be used depending on the building size and importance, ranging from approximate manual methods to more sophisticated computer-based techniques.
The document summarizes the design of a 3-story commercial building in Byangabo, Rwanda. It includes:
1) Design of structural elements like slabs, stairs, beams, and columns using software like Archicad, Google Earth, and Prokon.
2) Analysis of loads, material properties, and design of reinforcement for the structural elements.
3) Cost estimation of 884,001,554 RWF for constructing the 32-shop commercial building.
A design engineer is a person who may be involved in any of various engineering disciplines including civil, mechanical, electrical, chemical, textiles, aerospace, nuclear, manufacturing, systems, and structural /building/architectural. Design engineers tend to work on products and systems that involve adapting and using complex scientific and mathematical techniques. The emphasis tends to be on utilizing engineering physics and sciences to develop solutions for society.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of universal design and to consider its application to large scale assessments. Building on universal design principles presented by the Center for Universal Design, seven elements of universally designed assessments are identified and described in this paper. The seven elements are:
1. Inclusive assessment population
2. Precisely defined constructs
3. Accessible, non-biased items
4. Amendable to accommodations
5. Simple, clear, and intuitive instructions and procedures
6. Maximum readability and comprehensibility
7. Maximum legibility
Each of the elements is explored in this paper.
A Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Diversity on Idea generation'RAYO D.ISHOLA
Â
This dissertation examines the impact of personality and cognitive diversity on idea generation within organizations. It consists of 18,917 words across 6 chapters, including an introduction, literature review, methodology, results, analysis and discussion, and conclusion. The research was conducted using electronic questionnaires and a case scenario to generate ideas from respondents. The findings showed a relationship between diversity and the ideas generated, and that factors like management approaches can positively or negatively influence this relationship. The dissertation provides insight into how specific types of diversity rather than diversity as a whole, and specific innovation processes rather than innovation generally, impact organizations.
The document provides development proposals for a plot of land in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from two students. Boon Li Ying proposes developing a sports recreation center with facilities like a gym, yoga studio, and rock climbing wall. Ch'ng Phei Woon proposes a commercial area focused on food, including a two-story food court and restaurant, with additional parking and landscaping. Both proposals discuss the rationale, benefits, and potential impacts and professions involved in the projects.
The document provides development proposals for an unused plot of land in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from two students. Boon Li Ying proposes developing a sports recreation center with facilities like a gym, yoga studio, and rock climbing wall. Ch'ng Phei Woon proposes developing a commercial area focused on food, including a two-story food court and restaurant, with additional parking and landscaped areas. Both proposals discuss the rationale, benefits, impacts and professionals involved in the projects.
The document provides development proposals for an unused plot of land in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from two students. Boon Li Ying proposes developing a sports recreation center with facilities like a gym, yoga studio, and rock climbing wall. Ch'ng Phei Woon proposes developing a commercial area focused on food, including a two-story food court and restaurant, with additional parking and landscaping. Both proposals discuss the rationale, benefits, impacts and professions involved in the projects.
This document provides details on a proposed recreational district pavilion project at Taylor's University Lakeside Campus. Key points:
- The project involves constructing a recreational facility using shipping containers on a 600m2 site currently used as a parking area.
- The facility will include indoor and outdoor recreation spaces, a lounge, cafeteria, offices, and other amenities to accommodate workshops and events.
- Sustainability is a priority, requiring reuse of materials and renewable energy sources like solar power.
- Initial site analysis was conducted to understand the context and constraints. Container structures were selected for their modular design and quick assembly.
- A project team is assembled with defined roles for architects, engineers, landscape
This document proposes a commercial building development on a vacant land near a residential area and primary school. The two-story building would house a food court on the ground floor and stationary shops on the first floor. Key benefits include providing convenient access to food and school supplies for students. Potential impacts like traffic and noise are also discussed. The document outlines roles and responsibilities of various construction professionals involved in the project like contractors, architects, engineers, and suppliers. Materials suggested include stone flooring, wooden flooring, brick walls, and double-thick glass windows. Conceptual and master plans are also included.
This document is a training report submitted by Sher Bahadur to Kurukshetra University for a degree in civil engineering. It provides an overview of building construction topics covered during the training period, including different types of buildings, loads, building components, foundations, materials used, and quality control tests. The training gave Sher Bahadur hands-on experience in building construction that supplemented his theoretical classroom knowledge and prepared him for a career in the field.
EnviroStock Combined GENERAL & GRANTS Intro LetterDanny Stock
Â
Dr Danny Stock is expanding his environmental consultancy business, EnviroStock Consultants, and offers general consultancy services as well as grants application and administration services. EnviroStock Consultants provides services such as project management, data management, report writing, climate change and adaptation research, stakeholder engagement, staff development and training, and project management software development. Dr. Stock also has extensive experience writing grants proposals, understanding funding arrangements and reporting guidelines, and developing and implementing research plans from his previous work as a project manager and grants administrator at the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility.
The basics needs of human existences are food, clothingâs & shelter. From times immemorial man has been making efforts in improving their standard of living. The point of his efforts has been to provide an economic and efficient shelter. The possession of shelter besides being a basic, used, gives a feeling of security, responsibility and shown the social status of man.
Every human being has an inherent liking for a peaceful environment needed for his pleasant living, this object is achieved by having a place of living situated at the safe and convenient location, such a place for comfortable and pleasant living requires considered and kept in view.
This thesis describes the development of an Android-based multiple choice quiz application called Quizzy. Quizzy allows users to practice for exams by creating MCQ questions across various categories like computer science, verbal, and analytical. It includes features like hints, skipping questions, and pausing that act as lifelines. The app shows progress and results. It was built using a TinyDB database on the Android platform to store and retrieve questions. The goal was to help users prepare for admissions and recruitment tests through an engaging and interactive quiz-based learning experience.
SENN 2013 Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation-130918.pptZiaUlhaq765467
Â
This document discusses participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E). It begins by defining key terms like participation, monitoring, and evaluation. Participation refers to stakeholders influencing and sharing control over development initiatives that affect them. Monitoring is collecting data on implementation to compare to expected results, while evaluation assesses projects for relevance, effectiveness, and sustainability.
The document then explains that PM&E is a process where stakeholders at all levels engage in monitoring or evaluating a project and share control over the content, process, and results. It involves stakeholders like end users and local organizations. The four steps of PM&E are planning the process, gathering data, analyzing data, and sharing information to define actions. The planning phase includes identifying stakeholders
A study of the reasons, which fail's employees from making results in the pro...Apsara Kaduruwana
Â
A study of the reasons, which fail's employees from making results in the projects of XYZ non â profit organization.
This research was conducted in XYZ non- profit organization which works out to develop the rural areas of the country. As an organization they work out island widely covering most of the districts in the counter. As a percentage, 85% of their work done by projects basis in every area. All the employees who are working with the organization are attaching to the projects which are conducted by the organization.
The head office of the organization is located at the Colombo and the branch offices are located at each district which they are performing their work.
All to gather there are around 700 employees working with the organization, and in the head office there are around 65 employees work perform work.
As the organization all the work based on the projects, the success of the projects are an essential requirement. It is need to prove with the results that the projects which are conducted by the organization have makes success while giving out comes and impacts through them.
But in the current situation organization/ management has identified that the projects which are conducted by the organization are not making success as required by the objectives of them. As all the main activities of the organization based on these projects success or the failure of the projects have a direct impact to the overall organizational performance.
Not only that by the way when this problem grows up the employees and all the other stake holders who are influenced by these projects of the organization get affected through this project failure matter.
According to this reason the management agreed to conduct a research to find out why the employees who are working with the projects are not able to make the projectâs success up to the needed levels.
So the research conducted using the project/ program development team and program coordinators, who are having the main responsibility to planning and operating the projects from the starting to the end.
As sample population 30 employees were selected and questioner has distributed among them to collect data regarding the research topic.
After gathering data through the finding and the data analysis the researcher was able to prove the four selected alternative hypothesis, which have selected for this research study.
5.3 Conclusions
The study revealed that NGOs, through community education, can awaken latent local champions that would act as representatives of a community, take over the leadership role and push through the partnership. The findings concurs with the Livingstone Byekwaso (2006) that civic education to community is important in protecting rights of vulnerable groups like older people and children, as well as providing social, economic, cultural and political support to them and he also acknowledged on the role of NGOs including SAWAKA, in protecting the rights and entitlements of older people and vulnerable groups Therefore the study concludes that awareness creation by national NGOs had a positive influence on the implementation of child development policy in Karagwe.
The study established that Monitoring by NGO help to ensure smooth policy implementation progress as well which enhances the quality of expected results ,the findings concurs with the literature by Greenblot, (2008) that NGOâs played important roles through participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) towards the implementation of child development policy, therefore the study concludes that monitoring and evaluation on implementation of child development policies done by national NGOs in Karagwe enhance the implementation of child development policies.
The study revealed that Non-governmental organizations Carry out research on issues of importance to implementation of policy and share findings with the Government and other stakeholders, thus the study concludes that surveys by national NGOs on have a positive influence on the implementation of child development policy in Karagwe
The document summarizes Foo Shi-Ko's 3-month internship at Haipo Architects (HPA) in Shanghai, China. It details tasks completed during different project phases. In the schematic design phase for the Qiantan 10-01 mixed-use development, Foo attended client meetings and helped address issues in the initial design concept to comply with regulations. Professionals from HPA presented modifications needed for utilities, structure, and more. Foo also witnessed design presentations and discussions between the client and various consultants to refine the project.
The document summarizes a student design project focused on improving wheelchairs used in hospitals. The students conducted research at a hospital to understand issues with existing wheelchairs from the perspectives of patients, doctors, and nurses. They developed a concept called "Wall-C" - a compact wheelchair that folds easily and hangs on a wall for storage. Prototypes were created out of cardboard and aluminum to demonstrate the folding/hanging mechanism. The final report describes the research, concept development, prototypes, and concludes the design successfully addressed the goals of saving space in hospital corridors.
A TECHNICAL REPORT ON STUDENTSâ INDUSTRIAL WORK EXPERIENCE SCHEME (SIWES) UND...Michael Agwulonu
Â
This technical report encapsulates my four-month attachment experience with BOA Construction Company, a civil engineering consultancy firm. During this period, I delved into the practical application of civil engineering principles, transitioning from theoretical knowledge to hands-on structural design. I also acquired essential skills in manual design calculations, and participated in design, modelling and detailing of various residential and commercial projects. I also acquired knowledge in the steps, activities and processes involved in the actual execution of a project, and participated in many decision-making meetings in the course of construction, which helped me, enhance my mental ability and gave me insight to real-life problem-solving scenario. I was able to have practical knowledge in cost estimation and cost minimization in the course of construction. I obtained a practical knowledge of project supervision and management. The report outlines my extensive exposure to structural design, covering reinforced concrete and steel structures, my introduction to various software tools for structural analysis and my experience on site, as well as the challenges I encountered during the period of my training.
Similar to Structural design of a four storey office building (20)
A TECHNICAL REPORT ON STUDENTSâ INDUSTRIAL WORK EXPERIENCE SCHEME (SIWES) UND...
Â
Structural design of a four storey office building
1. 1
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Faculty of Technology and Built Environment
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (ENGG
MG7001/MG7101)
Structural design of a four storey
office building
Dongyezhan Liu
Disclaimer: Dongyezhan Liu
This document is a report on << Proposal for Structural design of a four storey office
building>> that was carried out as part of a student learning exercise. It has been marked and
awarded a grade. However, regardless of the grade awarded, there is no guarantee that the
contents of this document will be free from errors, inconsistencies, or discrepancies. While this
document may contain findings and recommendations that could be of use to the client, or indeed
anyone else reading this report, neither Unitec, the author of this report, nor any of the persons
mentioned under the Acknowledgements section of this document, shall bear any responsibility or
liability; should the client or anyone else, upon implementing the design or utilising any of the
findings and recommendations contained within this document, incur any harm, damage, liability,
injury, or any other kind of loss whatsoever.
October 2016
2. 2
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Permission Statement
I hereby, give ------- OR donât give -------- permission for my research/design project report
entitled:
_____________Structural design of a four storey office building
to be held in the Unitec Library.
Course: ___________Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Civil) ________
Year of completion: _____2016___
Department/School of _________Engineering_________________
I agree to this research being consulted for research or study purposes only provided that due
acknowledgement of its use is made where appropriate and any copying is made in
accordance with the Copyright Act 1994.
I agree to this research being available for interlibrary loan.
I have made all efforts to ensure that the information contained in the report is accurate. I
will not be held responsible for any inaccuracies. Also, I agree to this work being copied for
archive, external moderation, monitoring, promotional and future learning purposes.
Name: ________Dongyezhan Liu______
Signed: _______Dongyezhan Liu_______ Date: _____10/10/2016______
â
3. 3
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Declaration for Ethical Approval of Research/Design Project
I ________Dongyezhan Liu_________ declare that this research or design project:
(Studentâs full name)
Either
ï° Does not involve humans as participants?
Or
ï° Has ethical approval from UREC (as included in this project report)?
Signed: ________Dongyezhan Liu_______ Date: _____10/10/2016______
(Signature)
4. 4
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Executive Summary
The design of this project is about a 24Ã30 mm2
four storey reinforced concrete building
located on Auckland centre region. This project is focusing on structural frame analyses and
critical beams and columns design based on calculating the permanent, imposed and
Earthquake actions through utilizing Multi-frame program. While this project is in process, to
get start with the design ideas, the New Zealand standards, design concept, structural factors
and possible procedures relating to this project have been studied and learned to get
methodology and literature view done. The basic theory of this project is to design the
actions based on concrete frame. Meanwhile, the maximum bending moment, shear force
and axial load diagram are analysed through the different situations from combinations of
actions. The critical columns and beams design are undertaken from the BM, SF and AL
diagram. The capacity of beams and columns will be counted. All of these are compliant with
NZS 1170 series -Structural design actions and NZS 3101:2006, Concrete Structures Standard.
The detailed drawings are included.
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to my tutor Dr. Sherif Beskhyroun. This project
cannot be successfully completed without his great guidance and patience. In the process I
deal with this project, I have received many constructive suggestions and effective feedbacks
from him.
Finally, I would like to thank my parents and family for all the supports throughout this
project.
5. 5
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Table of Contents
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................8
1.1. Description of the building..........................................................................................8
1.2. Literature views.........................................................................................................10
1.3. Objectives..................................................................................................................11
1.4. Reinforced concrete..................................................................................................11
1.5. Structural considerations and assumptions..............................................................12
1.5.1. Gravity load........................................................................................................12
1.5.2. Material properties............................................................................................13
1.6. Durability...................................................................................................................14
1.7. Fire resistance ...........................................................................................................14
2. Methodology.....................................................................................................................14
2.1. New Zealand standards.............................................................................................14
2.2. Multi-frame ...............................................................................................................15
3. Frame building ..................................................................................................................15
3.1. Frame building...........................................................................................................15
3.2. Preliminary member sizes.........................................................................................16
4. Actions ..............................................................................................................................17
4.1. Longitudinal actions ..................................................................................................17
4.1.1. Permanent actions G .........................................................................................17
4.1.2. Imposed action Q...............................................................................................18
4.2. Transversal action .....................................................................................................19
4.2.1. Permanent actions G .........................................................................................19
4.2.2. Imposed action Q...............................................................................................20
4.3. Earthquake action .....................................................................................................21
5. Structure analysis .............................................................................................................25
5.1. Longitudinal section ..................................................................................................26
5.2. Transversal section....................................................................................................29
6. Beams Design....................................................................................................................31
6.1. Design Beams for longitudinal section......................................................................31
6.1.1. Roof level (Reinforcement bars)........................................................................32
7. 7
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
10.2. Transversal section................................................................................................92
10.2.1. 1.35G ..............................................................................................................92
10.2.2. 1.2G+1.5Q1 ....................................................................................................93
10.2.3. 1.2G+1.5Q2 ....................................................................................................95
10.2.4. 1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2.........................................................................................96
10.2.5. G+Eu+ððð......................................................................................................98
Figure 1 longitudinal section ......................................................................................................9
Figure 2 Transversal section.......................................................................................................9
Figure 3 Plan view ....................................................................................................................10
Figure 4 Table 3.2 from the NZS1170.1 structural design action.............................................12
Figure 5 Table 3.1 from NZS1170.0 general principles.............................................................13
Figure 6 Table3.6 from NZS3101:2006 Part1 ...........................................................................14
Figure 7 Floor plan....................................................................................................................16
Figure 8 Clause 9.4.1.2 Beams with rectangular cross sections ïŒNZS 3101ïŒ.......................16
Figure 9 Permanent actions G of longitudinal section .............................................................18
Figure 10 Imposed actions Q of longitudinal section ...............................................................19
Figure 11 Permanent actions G of transversal section.............................................................20
Figure 12 Imposed actions Q of transversal section.................................................................21
Figure 13 Earthquake actions (Longitudinal section) ...............................................................24
. Figure 14 Deflection due to Earthquake actions (Longitudinal section).................................24
Figure 15 Earthquake actions (Transversal section).................................................................25
Figure 16 Deflection due to Earthquake actions (Transversal section)....................................25
Figure 17 Maximum bending moment diagram for longitudinal section.................................26
Figure 18 Maximum shear force diagram for longitudinal section ..........................................27
Figure 19 Maximum axial load diagram for longitudinal section .............................................28
Figure 20 Maximum bending moment diagram for transversal section ..................................29
Figure 21 Maximum shear force diagram for transversal section............................................30
Figure 22 Maximum axial load diagram for transversal section...............................................31
Figure 23 Maximum bending moment diagram for roof..........................................................32
Figure 24 Maximum negative bending moment......................................................................33
Figure 25 Maximum positive bending moment .......................................................................34
Figure 26 Maximum negative bending moment......................................................................35
Figure 27 Maximum positive bending moment .......................................................................36
Figure 28 Maximum bending moment diagram for level1-3 ...................................................39
Figure 29 Maximum negative bending moment......................................................................40
Figure 30 Maximum positive bending moment .......................................................................41
Figure 31 Maximum negative bending moment......................................................................42
Figure 32 Maximum positive bending moment .......................................................................43
Figure 33 Maximum bending moment diagram for roof ïŒtransversal sectionïŒ ..................46
Figure 34 Maximum negative bending moment for transversal sction ...................................47
8. 8
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Figure 35 Maximum positive bending moment for transversal section...................................48
Figure 36 Maximum negative bending moment for transversal section .................................49
Figure 37 Maximum positive bending moment for transversal section...................................50
Figure 38 Maximum bending moment diagram for level 1-3 (transversal section) .................54
Figure 39 Maximum negative bending moment for transversal section .................................54
Figure 40 Maximum positive bending moment .......................................................................56
Figure 41 Maximum negative bending moment for transversal section .................................57
Figure 42 Maximum positive bending moment for transversal section...................................58
Figure 43 Maximum shear force diagram for level 1-3 (transversal section)...........................59
Figure 44 Columns design for the whole building....................................................................61
1.Introduction
1.1. Description of the building
In recent years, Auckland city has been growing rapidly. And, more and more people decide
to work in the CBD. Therefore, there is a need to construct more office building regarding
market demand. My project is to design a four storey reinforced concrete building in central
Auckland.
In my design, the structural design will be divided mainly into two parts: manual structural
analyses and finite program (Multi-frame 2D). In other words, this design will focus on slabs,
columns, and beams. This building is 24*30m. And, the story height is 4.5m. The strand
height will be 3.5m for each level. The short edge will have 3 bays. Therefore, for each bay
9. 9
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
will be 8*10m in a rectangular shape. This building could be demonstrated in Multi-frame 2D.
Figure 1 longitudinal section
Figure 2 Transversal section
10. 10
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Figure 3 Plan view
In the design part, the earthquake and wind actions will be considered in order to design the
resistance of reinforced concrete frame.
For more details, the capacity of the maximum load will be required to calculate to analyse
bending moment, shear force and axial force at critical sections under the ultimate strength
design. Due to safety consideration, there are two vital elements related to against failures.
This consideration includes serviceability limit state and ultimate limit state. The serviceability
limit state is to remain the elastic ensuring that the durability of the structures is on the
allowed range of normal working conditions. The ultimate limit state is providing ductility
prevented collapsed.
All the elements will be concerned with New Zealand concrete standards and structural
design action standards.
1.2. Literature views
The design of structures included the related elements are required to meet the standard for
stability, stiffness, strength, ductility, durability, robustness and fire resistance. (NZS3101:
2006)
11. 11
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Reinforced concrete is one of the most widely used composite materials in modern building
constructions. It utilizes the concrete in resisting compression forces, and steel bars or wires,
to resist reasonable tension forces. (Noel, 1993)
For the earthquake actions, it is defined in the equivalent static forces. To analyse the
equivalent static forces, each level of the structure needs to be acted simultaneously. In this
part, the horizontal seismic shear will be considered for calculating the combination of
horizontal design action coefficient and total seismic weight of the building. (NZS170. 5:2002)
To satisfy the static equilibrium of the horizontal forces for each level of the building, the
shear force, V, is required to be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the full set of
equivalent static lateral forces acting at various heights above ground level (Lusa, 2016)
The destruction of the building of reinforced concrete elements in flexure could exist in 3
ways, tension, compression and balanced failure. They have been dictated by the volume of
longitudinal reinforcement in tension. (Lusa, 2016) (p=As/(bÃd)) In this equation, the ratio of
reinforcement equals to the area of tension steel divided by effective section area of
concrete. (NZS3101: 2006)
The shear walls can be very efficient in resisting lateral loads originating from wind or
earthquakes. Well-designed shear walls in seismic areas can provide adequate structural
safety and give a great measure of protection against costly non-structural damage during
moderate seismic disturbances. (Park & Pauley, 1975)
1.3. Objectives
In my project, the design will be undertaken by the following approach:
Design the permanent and imposed actions
Design the earthquake and wind actions
Analyse the maximum axial force, shear force and bending moment using the multi-frame 2D
Design the specified columns
Design the specified beams
1.4. Reinforced concrete
It is most widely used materials in the world especially in construction (economic building
materials)
The maintenance cost of reinforced concrete is very low. And, in structure like footings,
dams, piers etc. reinforced concrete is the most economical construction material. Compared
to the use of steel in structure, reinforced concrete requires less skilled labour for the
erection of structure. Furthermore, Reinforced concrete, as a fluid material in the beginning,
can be economically moulded into a nearly limitless range of shapes.
It has great fire and weather resistance than other normal materials. (Such as: steel and
timber)
12. 12
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Reinforced concrete has a high compressive strength and adequate tensile strength
compared to other building materials. Due to the provided reinforcement, reinforced
concrete can also withstand a good amount tensile stress.
1.5. Structural considerations and assumptions
1.5.1. Gravity load
ï¶ Permanent load
Double Tee Floors â 3.79 Kpa
Ceiling and services â 0.3 Kpa
Partition wall â 0.4 Kpa
ï¶ Imposed load
The purpose of this building is used for office building only. The heavy loading duty cannot be
applied on the level of building.
The roof level is assumed as other floors.
Figure 4 Table 3.2 from the NZS1170.1 structural design action
ï¶ Earthquake load
Important level =3 as the office building is high consequence for loss of human life.
13. 13
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Figure 5 Table 3.1 from NZS1170.0 general principles
Z = 0.13 (Auckland region)
Site subsoil class C (shallow soil)
Design working life = 50 years, according to NZS3101:2006 Part1, The provisions of this
section shall apply to the detailing and specifying for durability of reinforced and pre-stressed
concrete structures and members with a specified intended life of 50 or 100 years.
Compliance with this section will ensure that the structure is sufficiently durable to satisfy the
requirements of the NZ Building Code throughout the life of the structure, with only normal
maintenance and without requiring reconstruction or major renovation. The 50 years
corresponds to the minimum structural performance life of a member to comply with that
code.
Limited ductile frame for the structure design
ï¶ Wind load
Due to the non-critical case compared with the earthquake load, the wind load is not took
into account in this project.
1.5.2. Material properties
-
Concrete density ðð =24 kn/m3
- Concrete compressive strength f ð
â²
=30 Mpa (not less than 25MPa and not greater
than 100MPa)
- Modulus of elasticity for concrete Ec = (fcâ)1/2 * 3200 + 6900 (25084MPa)
- Modulus of Elasticity for steel Es = 200000 MPa
- Main bending& shear reinforcement bar steel Grade 500E
- Main stirrups steel Grade 500
14. 14
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
1.6. Durability
According to NZS3101:2006 Part1, this project building is located at non-aggressive soil with
A2 exposure classification and is situated at protected environment.
Due to the standard, for fcâ = 30Mpa, the minimum required concrete cover is set up as
30mm for beams and columns.
Figure 6 Table3.6 from NZS3101:2006 Part1
1.7. Fire resistance
The fire resistance is assumed as 60 minutes throughout the office building.
2.Methodology
All the procedures of this project are analysed, calculated and considered through the New
Zealand Standards. For the details, auto CAD will be use to demonstrate specified drawings.
And, the analyses of the maximum of axial forces, shear forces and bending moments will be
utilized in Multi-frame 2D.
2.1. New Zealand standards
NZS1170: 2002 part 0: General principles
It provides general procedures and criteria for the structural design of a building or structure
in the limit states format. It covers limit states design, actions, and combinations of actions,
methods of analysis, robustness and confirmation of design. The objective of this standard is
to provide designers with general procedures and criteria for the structural design of
structures. It outlines a design methodology applied in accordance with established
engineering principles.
15. 15
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
NZS1170: 2002 part 1: Permanent, imposed and other actions
It specifies the varied situations in terms of the limit state design of structures used by
permanent, imposed, liquid pressure, ground water, rainwater pounding and earth pressure
actions.
NZS1170: 2002 part 2: Wind actions
It provides that the procedures to determine the winds speed resulting in any directions of
the building. Also, it shows that the criteria of wind actions undertaken in reasonable
structural design between different wind zone. (Except tornadoes)
NZS1170: 2002 part 5: Earthquake actions- New Zealand
It establishes the requirements of structural design for period of vibration, horizontal seismic
shear and equivalent static horizontal force.
NZS3101: 2006 Concrete structures standard (Part1- The design of concrete structures)
It outlines the verified methodology and compliant criteria of designing reinforced and pre-
stressed concrete structures with New Zealand Building Code. Additionally, it also has
summary tables to guide engineers design from aspects of beams, columns and connections.
2.2. Multi-frame
The Multi-frame program is the basic software which has been taught in the Unitec structure
class to design the structural frame. It includes the majority of materials about beams and
columns section. In this software, the permanent, imposed and earthquake action could be
inputted onto the different level of building. Also, there is possible to put all the basic static
actions into combination static actions to prepare the various situations. Also, the maximum
bending moment, shear force and axial load could be analysed for calculating the capacity for
critical beams and columns.
3. Frame building
3.1. Frame building
The frame is illustrated as below.
16. 16
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Figure 7 Floor plan
3.2. Preliminary member sizes
In the AS/NZS 3101: part 1:2006 concrete standard, the table 2.1 & the clause 9.4.1. Design
of reinforced concrete beams will be used as main design principles for my project.
According to this:
Figure 8 Clause 9.4.1.2 Beams with rectangular cross sections ïŒNZS 3101ïŒ
The depth, width and clear length between the faces of supports of members with
rectangular cross sections, to which moments are applied at both ends by adjacent beams,
columns or both, shall be such that:
17. 17
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ð¿ð
ðð€
†25
ð¿ðâ
ð ð€
2
†100
Therefore, the beam sizes will be undertaken as:
From Table 2.1, fy= 500Mpaï® one end continuous
h â¥
ð¿
20
=
10000
20
= 500ðð
fy=500Mpaï®both end continuous h=600. 700, 800mm
h â¥
ð¿
25
=
10000
25
= 400ðð
Design beams: 350Ã800 mm
mm
h
bw 400
2
ïœïœ
mmbbb wce 5005050 ïœï«ï«ïœïœ
mm
bb
LLn ce
950050010000
22
ïœïïœïïïœ
Check: 2575.23
400
9500n
ïŒïœïœ
wb
L
OK
Check: 10078.20
nh
2
ïŒïœ
wb
L
OK
Check: 3
350
800
232 ïŒïŒïœïŒïŒ
b
h
OK
For the column sizes, from clause 10.4. Dimensions of columns and piers.
mmbbb wce 5005050 ïœï«ï«ïœïœ
Therefore, columns will be: 500Ã500mm
4.Actions
4.1. Longitudinal actions
4.1.1. Permanent actions G
Slabs
24. 24
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
3 1542.66 11.5 17740.59 80.722
2 1542.66 8 12341.28 56.154
1 1553.06 4.5 6988.77 31.8
â 59581.38 â 294.677 â OK
d4= 16.033 mm d3= 13.927 mm d2= 10.537 mm d1= 6.139 mm
Figure 13 Earthquake actions (Longitudinal section)
. Figure 14 Deflection due to Earthquake actions (Longitudinal section)
25. 25
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Figure 15 Earthquake actions (Transversal section)
Figure 16 Deflection due to Earthquake actions (Transversal section)
5.Structure analysis
According to section 4 combinations of static actions from NZS1170.0 General Principles, to
use the combinations of actions for ultimate limit states in checking strength:
26. 26
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Ed= 1.35G permanent action only (does not apply to pre-stressing forces)
Ed= 1.2G+1.5Q permanent and imposed action
Ed= G+Eu+ðð ð where ðð = 0.4 (for office building, from Table 4.1 in NZS1170.0 General
Principles)
All the above combinations of static actions are analysed in Multi-frame.
5.1. Longitudinal section
Figure 17 Maximum bending moment diagram for longitudinal section
31. 31
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Figure 22 Maximum axial load diagram for transversal section
6.Beams Design
6.1. Design Beams for longitudinal section
From NZS 3101 Part1: clause 9.3.8.4 Maximum diameter of longitudinal beam bar in internal
beam column joint zones. It says:
For nominally ductile structures the maximum diameter of longitudinal beam bars passing
through beam column joint zones shall not exceed the appropriate requirement given below
for internal beam column joints:
For the earthquake does not govern:
ð ð
âð
†6ðŒ ð¡ Ã
âðð
â²
ððŠ(1+
ð ð
ð ðŠ
)
where ðŒ ð¡ = 1 (ððð ð€ððŠððððð) ðð = 0.5ððŠ
32. 32
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Therefore, ð ð = (6 +
â30
500Ã1.5
) Ã 500 = 21.9ðð â Choose HD20
6.1.1. Roof level (Reinforcement bars)
Figure 23 Maximum bending moment diagram for roof
33. 33
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
6.1.1.1. Pointâa of maximum negative moment case 1.35G:
Figure 24 Maximum negative bending moment
As the picture above shows, the maximum positive bending moment is 315.765knm.
ð ð =
ðâ
ð
=
315.765
0.85
= 371.488ððð
d = h â ð¶ð â
ð·
2
= 800 â 30 â
20
2
= 760ðð
Assume jd= 0.9d= 760Ã0.9= 684mm
â ð¹ = 0 C=T
a =
ð ð
0.85ððð
â² ð ð
=
371488000
0.85 Ã 350 Ã 684 Ã 30
= 60.85ðð
jd=d â
ð
2
= 760 â 60.85 ÷ 2 = 729.575ðð
ðŽ ð =
ð ð
ððŠ ð ð
=
371488000
500 Ã 729.575
= 1018.36ðð2
AD20=314.16mm2
As/AD20=3.24 says 4 bars
â4HD20 is required (Asreq=1256.64mm2
)
Check: ðŽ ððð =
âðð
â²
4ððŠ
ð ð€ ð =
â30
4Ã500
à 350 à 800 = 728.471ðð2
ðŽ ððð¥ =
10+ðð
â²
6ððŠ
ð ð€ ð =
40
6Ã500
à 350 à 800 = 3546.667ðð2
34. 34
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ðŽ ððð †ðŽ ð ððð †ðŽ ððð¥ (ððŸ)
ðððð¥ =
10 + ðð
â²
6ððŠ
=
40
6 Ã 500
= 0.013 < 0.025 (ððŸ)
M = ðŽ ð ððð ð ð ððŠ = 1256 à 729.575 à 500 = 458.171ððð > ðð (ððŸ)
6.1.1.2. Point of âb maximum positive moment case 1.35G:
Figure 25 Maximum positive bending moment
As the picture above shows, the maximum positive bending moment is 285.748knm.
ð ð =
ðâ
ð
=
285.748
0.85
= 336.744ððð
d = h â ð¶ð â
ð·
2
= 800 â 30 â
20
2
= 760ðð
Assume jd= 0.9d= 760Ã0.9= 684mm
â ð¹ = 0 C=T
a =
ð ð
0.85ððð
â² ð ð
=
336744000
0.85 Ã 350 Ã 684 Ã 30
= 55.068ðð
jd=d â
ð
2
= 760 â 55.068 ÷ 2 = 732.446ðð
ðŽ ð =
ð ð
ððŠ ð ð
=
336744000
500 Ã 732.446
= 917.92ðð2
AD20=314.16mm2
As/AD20=2.9 says 3 bars
35. 35
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
â3HD20 is required (Asreq=942.478mm2
)
Check: ðŽ ððð =
âðð
â²
4ððŠ
ð ð€ ð =
â30
4Ã500
à 350 à 800 = 728.471ðð2
ðŽ ððð¥ =
10+ðð
â²
6ððŠ
ð ð€ ð =
40
6Ã500
à 350 à 800 = 3546.667ðð2
ðŽ ððð †ðŽ ð ððð †ðŽ ððð¥ (ððŸ)
ðððð¥ =
10 + ðð
â²
6ððŠ
=
40
6 Ã 500
= 0.013 < 0.025 (ððŸ)
M = ðŽ ð ððð ð ð ððŠ = 942.478 à 732.466 à 500 = 345.166ððð > ðð (ððŸ)
6.1.1.3. . Point âc of maximum negative moment case 1.35G:
Figure 26 Maximum negative bending moment
As the picture above shows, the maximum positive bending moment is 530.063knm.
ð ð =
ðâ
ð
=
530.063
0.85
= 623.604ððð
d = h â ð¶ð â
ð·
2
= 800 â 30 â
20
2
= 760ðð
Assume jd= 0.9d= 760Ã0.9= 684mm
â ð¹ = 0 C=T
a =
ð ð
0.85ððð
â² ð ð
=
623604000
0.85 Ã 350 Ã 684 Ã 30
= 102.151ðð
36. 36
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
jd=d â
ð
2
= 760 â 102.151 ÷ 2 = 708.924ðð
ðŽ ð =
ð ð
ððŠ ð ð
=
623604000
500 Ã 708.924
= 1759.3ðð2
AD20=314.16mm2
As/AD20=5.6 says 6 bars
â6HD20 is required (Asreq=1884.956mm2
)
Check: ðŽ ððð =
âðð
â²
4ððŠ
ð ð€ ð =
â30
4Ã500
à 350 à 800 = 728.471ðð2
ðŽ ððð¥ =
10+ðð
â²
6ððŠ
ð ð€ ð =
40
6Ã500
à 350 à 800 = 3546.667ðð2
ðŽ ððð †ðŽ ð ððð †ðŽ ððð¥ (ððŸ)
ðððð¥ =
10 + ðð
â²
6ððŠ
=
40
6 Ã 500
= 0.013 < 0.025 (ððŸ)
M = ðŽ ð ððð ð ð ððŠ = 1884.956 à 708.924 à 500 = 668.145ððð > ðð (ððŸ)
6.1.1.4. Point âd of maximum positive moment case 1.2G+1.5Q2:
Figure 27 Maximum positive bending moment
As the picture above shows, the maximum positive bending moment is 228.885knm.
54. 54
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
6.2.3. Level 1-3 (Reinforcement bars)
Figure 38 Maximum bending moment diagram for level 1-3 (transversal section)
6.2.3.1. Pointâa of maximum negative moment case 1.2G+1.5Q2:
Figure 39 Maximum negative bending moment for transversal section
As the picture above shows, the maximum positive bending moment is 337.041 knm.
61. 61
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Check:
ðŽ ð,ððð =
1
16
âðð
â²
ð ð€ ð
ððŠð¡
=
1
16
â30
350 Ã 210
500
= 74.28ðð2
< ðŽ ð = 50.32ðð2
ððŸ
Thus, R10@ 210 c/c
7.Column Design
7.1. Marginal columns (Longitudinal section)
b= 500mm h= 500mm Cc= 30mm
Assume D24 will be used (AD24=452.39 mm2
)
gh = h â 2cc â D = 500 â 2 x 30 - 24 = 416
g= gh/h= 416/500= 0.83
Figure 44 Columns design for the whole building
7.1.1. Roof level
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) case1.35G
Mdes= 256.865knm Ndes=272.638kn
62. 62
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
272638
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 1.28 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
256865000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.42 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.008
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.35G= (Ncorresponding & M*) case1.35G
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.008
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.008Ã500Ã500= 2000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 4.4
39.452
2000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 154.296kn N*
= 272.638kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã154.296= 351.203kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
203.351*
ïª
V
468.031kn where ïª =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
2.044Mpa
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb=
''
109.0p1007.0 cc ff ïœï« ïŒïŒ Check:
'''
2.0109.008.0 ccc fff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
2726383
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.109
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.109Ã0.109 30 Ã500Ã458=179.817kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 468.031- 179.817= 288.214kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ 109.130111.0 0.785Mpa
63. 63
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 2.044-0.785/2= 1.651Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
Av=
ï ï 399.206
4500
500500651.1
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
288214
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 250mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 250 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
120500651.1min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 198.143mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 41.079mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4 legged R10 @ 120c/c
7.1.2. Level 3
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 246.286knm Ndes=655.828kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
655.828
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 3.09 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
246286000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.32 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
64. 64
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.008
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2= (Ncorresponding & M*) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.008
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.008Ã500Ã500= 2000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 4.4
39.452
2000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 140.354kn N*
= 655.828kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã140.354= 319.305kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
319.305*
ïª
V
425.74kn where ïª =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
1.859Mpa
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
6558283
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.262
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.262Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=204.688kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 425.74-204.668= 221.072kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ 622.1087.0 0.894Mpa
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 1.859-0.894/2= 1.412Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
65. 65
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Av=
ï ï 532.176
4500
500500124.1
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
221072
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV
ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 330mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 330 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
120500124.1min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 198.143mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 169.471mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4legged R10 @ 120c/c
7.1.3. Level 2
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 274.86knm Ndes=1052.32kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1052320
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 4.95 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
274860000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.59 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.014
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2= (Ncorresponding & M*) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.014
66. 66
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.014Ã500Ã500= 3500mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 7.7
39.452
3500
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 150.38kn N*
= 1052.32kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã150.38= 342.115kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
342.115*
ïª
V
456.153kn where =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
1.992Mpa
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
10523203
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.421
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.421Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=230.382kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 456.153-230.382= 225.77kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ .4211087.0 1Mpa
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 1.992-1 /2= 1.489Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
Av=
ï ï 114.186
4500
500500894.1
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
770225
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 320mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
67. 67
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 320 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
120500.4891min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 198.143mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 41.079mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041 mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4 legged R10 @ 120c/c
7.1.4. Level 1
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
Mdes= 235.584knm Ndes=1101.533kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1101533
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 5.18 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
235584000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.22 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.012
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 168.908knm Ndes=1441.401kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1441401
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 6.78 MPa
68. 68
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
168908000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.59 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt<0
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.012
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.012Ã500Ã500= 3000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 6.6
39.452
3000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 103.735kn N*
= 1441.401 kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã103.735= 235.997kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
235.997*
ïª
V
314.663kn where ïª =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
1.374Mpa
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
14414013
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.577
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.577Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=255.616kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 314.663-255.616= 59.047kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ .5771087.0 1.116Mpa
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 0.816Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
69. 69
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Av=
ï ï 995.101
4500
5005000.816
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
59047
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV
ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 1220mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 1220 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
120500816.0min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 97.915 mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 41.079mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4legged R10 @ 120c/c
7.2. Marginal columns (Transversal section)
7.2.1. Roof level
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) case 1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 219.047 knm Ndes=254.401kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
254401
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 1.2 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
219047000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.06 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.014
70. 70
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.35G
Mdes= 215.25 knm Ndes=267.212 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
267212
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 1.26 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
215250000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.03MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt=0.013
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.014
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.014Ã500Ã500= 3500mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 7.7
39.452
3500
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 119.402 kn N*
= 267.212 kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã119.402= 271.64 kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
271.64*
ïª
V
362.186 kn where ïª =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
1.582 Mpa
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
2672123
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.107
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.107Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=179.465 kn
71. 71
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Vs=Vn- Vc= 362.186-179.465= 182.721 kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ .1071087.0 0.784 Mpa
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 1.19 Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
Av=
ï ï 719.148
4500
50050019.1
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
59047
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV
ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 390mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 390 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
12050019.1min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 142.77 mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 41.079mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4 legged R10 @ 120c/c
7.2.2. Level 3
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
Mdes= 199.312knm Ndes=506.22 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
506220
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 2.38 MPa
72. 72
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
199312000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.88 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.014
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 191.908 knm Ndes=649.762 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
649762
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 3.06MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
191908000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.81 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt=0.013
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.014
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.014Ã500Ã500= 3500mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 7.7
39.452
3500
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE=110.304 kn N*
= 649.762 kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã110.304= 271.64 kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
271.64*
ïª
V
362.186kn where ïª =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
1.582Mpa
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
73. 73
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
6497623
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.26
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.26Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=204.275 kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 362.186 -204.275= 157.911 kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ .261087.0 0.892 Mpa
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 1.136 Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
Av=
ï ï .948141
4500
500500136.1
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
157911
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 460 mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 460 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
120500136.1min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 136.27 mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 41.079mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041 mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4 legged R10 @ 120c/c
7.2.3. Level 2
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
74. 74
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Mdes= 219.094 knm Ndes=808.283 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
808283
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 3.8 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
219094000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.0 6MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.012
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 209.113 knm Ndes=1043.388 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1043388
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 4.91 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
209113000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.97 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt=0.011
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.012
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.012Ã500Ã500= 3000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 6.6
39.452
3000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE=123.506 kn N*
= 1043.388kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã123.506= 235.997 kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
235.997*
ïª
V
314.663 kn where ïª =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
1.5374Mpa
75. 75
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
388.10433
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.417
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.417Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=229.803 kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 314.663-229.803= 84.86 kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ .4171087.0 1 Mpa
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 0.872Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
Av=
ï ï 04.109
4500
500500872.0
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
84860
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV
ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 850 mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 850 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
120500872.0min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 104.678mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 41.079mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041 mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4 legged R10 @ 120c/c
76. 76
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
7.2.4. Level 1
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
Mdes= 216.8 knm Ndes= 1114.559kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1114559
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 5.24 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
216800000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 2.04 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt=0.008
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 125.161 knm Ndes=1427.949 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1427949
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 6.72 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
125161000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.18 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt<0
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.008
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.008Ã500Ã500= 2000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 4.4
39.452
2000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE=94.231 kn N*
= 1427.949 kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã94.231= 214.376 kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
77. 77
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
214.376*
ïª
V
285.834 kn where ïª =0.75
Vn= ïœ
bd
Vn
1.248Mpa
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
14279493
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.57
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.57Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=254.743kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 285.834 -254.743= 31.091 kn
Vc=Vb.Kn= ïœïŽ .571087.0 1.112 Mpa
Steel shear stress:
Vs= Vn- Vc/2= 0.692 Mpa
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
Av=
ï ï 497.86
4500
500500692.0
4fy
bhs
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœ
ïŽ
V
mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœï®ïœ
31091
45850016.314
Vs
dfA
S
s
d
fAV
ytvprov
req
req
ytvprovs 2310 mm
10db = 10 x 24 = 240 mm
Smin= mm125
4
500
4
b
ïœïœ Smin=120mm
mm150
3
458
3
d
ïœïœ
Sreq = 2310 mm
ï ï ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
500
120500692.0min
fyt
bsVs
Avreq 83.037 mm < Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
For anti-buckling:
ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽïŽïœïœ
500
120500
30
16
1
16
1 min'
vmin
yt
c
c
f
sb
fA 41.079mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
78. 78
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ïœ
ïŽïŽ
ïŽïŽ
ïœïœ
ï¥
24500135
120500248
135
A minb D
df
sf
A
byt
y
te 134.041 mm< Avprov= 314.16mm2
OK
4 legged R10 @ 120c/c
7.3. Internal columns
7.3.1. Roof level
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
Mdes= 105.789knm Ndes=454.292kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
454292
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 2.14 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
105789000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.012
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.35G
Mdes= 36.89knm Ndes=600.272kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
600272
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 2.82 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
36890000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 3.17 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt<0
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.012
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.012Ã500Ã500= 3000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 6.6
39.452
3000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
79. 79
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
VE= 52.789 kn N*
= 600.272kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã52.789= 120.095 kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
120.095*
ïª
V
160.127 kn where ïª =0.75
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
6002723
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.24
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.24Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=201.065kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 160.127-201.065= -40.939kn
Thus, no need stirrups but constructive.
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
4 legged R10 @ 240c/c
7.3.2. Level 3
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
Mdes= 120.9knm Ndes=974.727kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1974727
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 4.59 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
120900000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.14 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.008
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 9.5knm Ndes=1342.712 kn
80. 80
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1441401
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 6.32 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
168908000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 0.09 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt<0
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.008
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.008Ã500Ã500= 2000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 4.4
39.452
2000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 66.38kn N*
= 1342.712kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã66.38= 151.015kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
151.015*
ïª
V
201.353kn where ïª =0.75
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
13427123
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.537
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.3537Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=249.215kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 201.353-249.215= -47.863kn
Thus, no need stirrups but constructive.
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
4 legged R10 @ 240c/c
81. 81
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
7.3.3. Level 2
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
Mdes= 166.117knm Ndes= 1497.766kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
1497766
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 7.05 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
166117000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.56 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.008
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 30.435knm Ndes=2123.84 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
2123840
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 9.99 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
30435000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 0.29 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt<0
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.008
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.008Ã500Ã500= 2000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 4.4
39.452
2000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 94.426kn N*
= 2123.84kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE=1.3Ã1.75Ã94.426= 214.819 kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
82. 82
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Vn= ïœïœ
75.0
214.819*
ïª
V
286.428kn where ïª =0.75
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœ
ïŽ
ïŽ
ï«ïœï« 2'
*
50030
21238403
1
3
1
Agf
N
c
1.85
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã1.85Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=299.875kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 286.426-299.875= -13.449kn
Thus, no need stirrups but constructive.
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
4 legged R10 @ 240c/c
7.3.4. Level 1
ï¶ Reinforcement bars
(Ncorresponding & M*) caseG+Eu+Q
Mdes= 204.836knm Ndes=2029.268kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
2029268
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 9.55 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
204836000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 1.93 MPa
(Cl 10.3.8.1) Minimum longitudinal reinforcement in nominally ductile design 0.008Ag
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt= 0.008
(N*
& Mcorres) case1.2G+1.5Q1+1.5Q2
Mdes= 15.532knm Ndes=2912.379 kn
ðâ
ð.ð.â
=
2912379
0.85Ã 500Ã500
= 13.71 MPa
ðâ
ð.ð.â2 =
15532000
0.85Ã500Ã5002 = 0.15 MPa
From Column chart 500/30/0.8 & 0.9 â minimum pt<0
83. 83
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
Thus, the maximum pt= 0.008
Asreq= ptÃbÃh= 0.008Ã500Ã500= 2000mm2
(Cl 10.3.8.2) Minimum number of longitudinal reinforcement bars
N= 4.4
39.452
2000
24
ïœïœ
D
sreq
A
A
The minimum reinforce bars is 8.
Thus, use 8D24
ï¶ Stirrups
VE= 84.235kn N*
= 2912.379kn
d=h-Cc-D/2=500- 30- 24= 458mm
V*=1.3.Ѐoâ.VE= 191.635kn where Ѐoâ=1.75
Vn= ïœ
ïª
*
V
255.513 kn where ïª =0.75
ïœ
ïŽ
ïœïœ
458500
243
bd
DA
P S
0.0059
Vb= 708.0p1007.0
'
ïœï« cfïŒïŒ Check:
''
2.0708.008.0 cc ff ïŒïŒ OK
Kn= ïœï«
Agf
N
c
'
*
3
1 2.165
Vc=KaKnVbAcv=1Ã2.165Ã0.708Ã500Ã458=351kn
Vs=Vn- Vc= 255.513-351= -95kn
Thus, no need stirrups but constructive.
Use 4 legged R10 stirrups ï® Avprov= 314.16mm2
4 legged R10 @ 240c/c
8.Conclusions
84. 84
Dongyezhan Liu 1421941
This project is being designed for the commercial office building located in Auckland centre
region. The dimensions of beams and columns are considered as 350Ã800 mm and 500Ã500
mm. The permanent, imposed and earthquake actions are calculated for creating the
structure frame. The structure frame is taken into account by two different aspects:
longitudinal and transversal section, which has the unique factors influenced by the various
length of bays for both sides. All the above components are relevant with the NZS 3101:2006
part 1 Concrete design and NZS 1170 series -Structural design actions.
In the result of load distribution applying on each level, for the permanent load distribution,
they are all equal to each other. The only different is the point load, which is calculated by
self-weight of glazing and columns. For the imposed load distribution, the main difference
could be observed by eyes. As roof level treated as other levels, the value of Ïe is remarkably
lower than other levels.
The internal columns design is done from longitudinal section due to the critical value
existing in this section. As the pt number is tiny caused by columns size w, all the
reinforcement bars are used as 8HD24.
9.References
Structural Concrete, Dr. Lusa Tuleasca handouts
Park, R., & Pauley, T. (1975). Reinforced concrete structures. Christchurch, New Zealand: John
Wiley & Sons Company.
Noel, J. (1993). Reinforced concrete design. Texas, USA: McGraw-Hill Company.
NZS3101: 2006 Concrete structures standard
NZS4203: 1992 Code of practice for general structural design and design loading for building
NZS1170: 2002 part 0: General principles
NZS1170: 2002 part 1: Permanent, imposed and other actions
NZS1170: 2002 part 5: Earthquake actions- New Zealand
10. Appendices
10.1. Longitudinal section combinations
10.1.1. 1.35G
ï¶ Bending moment