Economic Development Strategic
Planning
Jim Damicis
Senior Vice President
Camoin Associates
April 28-29,2016
1
2
Strategic Project/Initiative
Identification & Implementation
overview of principal
stages of the project
cycle
project identification
project assessment
project
implementation
principal stages of the project cycle
identification
assessment or
appraisal
implementation
3
ways to gather ideas
prior and existing plans and documents
utilizing existing meetings
one-on-one discussions
focus groups
soliciting input through email/social media
4
project identification
consider range of alternative projects &
programs
identify projects & programs in light of:
o strategic economic development goals
o objectives
o strategies established earlier
broadly evaluate project proposals
5
broad criteria
Does it help achieve a goal or objective?
Does the community have the resource &
capacity to undertake the program?
note
olimit depth of analysis
osimply decide if further consideration is
warranted
6
project assessment
individuals who identify proposals should prioritize
project options
stakeholders should establish set of standards or
criteria
o identify the best possible projects
o recognize both the positive & negative impacts
conduct research to assess feasibility
o initial or first phase: assess which proposals to
pursue, & prioritize
o second phase: in-depth feasibility study
7
ingredients for a successful project:
Camoin Associates 8
project worksheets
basic description
relation to strategic plan (in terms of goals)
economic development benefits
regional benefits & issues
9
project worksheets
resources available for execution
additional resources required
potential barriers to overcome
conclusions about project feasibility
10
project feasibility section
funding
capital cost
required municipal/gov’t body proceedings
government support
11
after collecting project information...
quantify
information
• tally scores
for each
program
input data into
matrix
• higher scores
reflect higher
feasibility
12
assessing alternatives
priorities impact
feasibility
- time
- cost
-social/political
- technical
cost-benefit
analysis
13
priorities
projects that reflect plans goals &
objectives rank higher
review alternatives individually
compare alternatives
o likely effects
o how well it meets the specific goals
14
impact
determine positive & negative
o local economy
o regional way of life
all ventures have advantages & disadvantages
estimate degree of impact of each
rank projects with greatest net effects as top
priorities
15
economic feasibility
time
o 1-2 year projects rank higher
o longer completion time increase uncertainty
cost
o operating expenses and financing capacity
o opportunity costs
expensive & time consuming proposals with
low returns should be designated low priority
16
cost-benefit analysis
determines economic viability
used to assess a single project or for comparison
can be used to determine most efficient use of
resources
process
o identify & calculate costs & benefits
o calculate the net impact
17
sunk costs
project costs do not include sunk costs
costs, prior to implementation, may include
o existing infrastructure
o buildings
o services
o supplies
18
benefits
all revenue that results from project operation
measured by increase in output or cost
savings
examples of project revenues
o municipal taxes
o fees or charges for services
o sale of remaining equipment
19
direct & indirect costs
direct costs & benefits result specifically
from the project
indirect costs & benefits result because of
ripple effects
20
social/political feasibility
Rank highly proposals with a great degree of
community support from public officials,
business leaders, & residents. Social
support can make or break a program
alternative.
21
technical feasibility
Can the region handle a project of this magnitude?
Do the right people with the right skills exist in the
to carry out the project?
Is the technology available?
Is the experience & knowledge there?
Are the resources available?
22
sample vertical matrix
Criteria/Proposed Project
Project
1
Project
2
Project
3
Project
4
in line with present goals
exploits opportunity
depends against a threat
length of time to measure impact
financing available
politically acceptable
has stakeholder support
necessary skills/staff/space
23
action plans
tasks involved
o sequence with respect to other tasks.
who or what organization is responsible for each task
realistic timetables for the completion of different activities
expected impacts or results of the action
funding requirements, including identification of sources
performance benchmarks
24
Camoin Associates 25
sample implementation matrix
implementing programs
need for flexibility
o leave room for changes & delays
o develop strategy for problem resolution
keeping the plan alive
o marketing, market, marketing
26
amending programs & successive
planning efforts
revisit & update annually
confirm or adjust
opportunities or threats require immediate
action
o new grant program, plant closing, natural
disaster
27
Jim Damicis, Senior Vice President – Principal - Camoin
Associates
• Immediate Past President, Northeastern Economic
Developers Association
• IEDC, Economic Development Research Program,
International Economic Development Council
• Collaborator – Communities of the Future
• 25+ Years Experience in Economic and Community
Development
jim@camoinassociates.com
www.camoinassociates.com
Twitter: @jdamicis
Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jdamicis
Blog: www.camoinassociates.com/blog/
• Comprehensive Economic Development
Strategies (CEDS)
• Stakeholder Engagement
• Workforce Development
• Market Analysis & Financial Feasibility
• Evaluation & Benchmarking Indicators
• ED Communication & Marketing

Strategic Project/Initiative Identification and Implementation April 28-April 29 2016

  • 1.
    Economic Development Strategic Planning JimDamicis Senior Vice President Camoin Associates April 28-29,2016 1
  • 2.
    2 Strategic Project/Initiative Identification &Implementation overview of principal stages of the project cycle project identification project assessment project implementation
  • 3.
    principal stages ofthe project cycle identification assessment or appraisal implementation 3
  • 4.
    ways to gatherideas prior and existing plans and documents utilizing existing meetings one-on-one discussions focus groups soliciting input through email/social media 4
  • 5.
    project identification consider rangeof alternative projects & programs identify projects & programs in light of: o strategic economic development goals o objectives o strategies established earlier broadly evaluate project proposals 5
  • 6.
    broad criteria Does ithelp achieve a goal or objective? Does the community have the resource & capacity to undertake the program? note olimit depth of analysis osimply decide if further consideration is warranted 6
  • 7.
    project assessment individuals whoidentify proposals should prioritize project options stakeholders should establish set of standards or criteria o identify the best possible projects o recognize both the positive & negative impacts conduct research to assess feasibility o initial or first phase: assess which proposals to pursue, & prioritize o second phase: in-depth feasibility study 7
  • 8.
    ingredients for asuccessful project: Camoin Associates 8
  • 9.
    project worksheets basic description relationto strategic plan (in terms of goals) economic development benefits regional benefits & issues 9
  • 10.
    project worksheets resources availablefor execution additional resources required potential barriers to overcome conclusions about project feasibility 10
  • 11.
    project feasibility section funding capitalcost required municipal/gov’t body proceedings government support 11
  • 12.
    after collecting projectinformation... quantify information • tally scores for each program input data into matrix • higher scores reflect higher feasibility 12
  • 13.
    assessing alternatives priorities impact feasibility -time - cost -social/political - technical cost-benefit analysis 13
  • 14.
    priorities projects that reflectplans goals & objectives rank higher review alternatives individually compare alternatives o likely effects o how well it meets the specific goals 14
  • 15.
    impact determine positive &negative o local economy o regional way of life all ventures have advantages & disadvantages estimate degree of impact of each rank projects with greatest net effects as top priorities 15
  • 16.
    economic feasibility time o 1-2year projects rank higher o longer completion time increase uncertainty cost o operating expenses and financing capacity o opportunity costs expensive & time consuming proposals with low returns should be designated low priority 16
  • 17.
    cost-benefit analysis determines economicviability used to assess a single project or for comparison can be used to determine most efficient use of resources process o identify & calculate costs & benefits o calculate the net impact 17
  • 18.
    sunk costs project costsdo not include sunk costs costs, prior to implementation, may include o existing infrastructure o buildings o services o supplies 18
  • 19.
    benefits all revenue thatresults from project operation measured by increase in output or cost savings examples of project revenues o municipal taxes o fees or charges for services o sale of remaining equipment 19
  • 20.
    direct & indirectcosts direct costs & benefits result specifically from the project indirect costs & benefits result because of ripple effects 20
  • 21.
    social/political feasibility Rank highlyproposals with a great degree of community support from public officials, business leaders, & residents. Social support can make or break a program alternative. 21
  • 22.
    technical feasibility Can theregion handle a project of this magnitude? Do the right people with the right skills exist in the to carry out the project? Is the technology available? Is the experience & knowledge there? Are the resources available? 22
  • 23.
    sample vertical matrix Criteria/ProposedProject Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4 in line with present goals exploits opportunity depends against a threat length of time to measure impact financing available politically acceptable has stakeholder support necessary skills/staff/space 23
  • 24.
    action plans tasks involved osequence with respect to other tasks. who or what organization is responsible for each task realistic timetables for the completion of different activities expected impacts or results of the action funding requirements, including identification of sources performance benchmarks 24
  • 25.
    Camoin Associates 25 sampleimplementation matrix
  • 26.
    implementing programs need forflexibility o leave room for changes & delays o develop strategy for problem resolution keeping the plan alive o marketing, market, marketing 26
  • 27.
    amending programs &successive planning efforts revisit & update annually confirm or adjust opportunities or threats require immediate action o new grant program, plant closing, natural disaster 27
  • 28.
    Jim Damicis, SeniorVice President – Principal - Camoin Associates • Immediate Past President, Northeastern Economic Developers Association • IEDC, Economic Development Research Program, International Economic Development Council • Collaborator – Communities of the Future • 25+ Years Experience in Economic and Community Development jim@camoinassociates.com www.camoinassociates.com Twitter: @jdamicis Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jdamicis Blog: www.camoinassociates.com/blog/ • Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies (CEDS) • Stakeholder Engagement • Workforce Development • Market Analysis & Financial Feasibility • Evaluation & Benchmarking Indicators • ED Communication & Marketing