1) Around half of US high school graduates express interest in STEM majors and careers each year, though readiness in math and science is still low overall.
2) Students with both expressed and measured interest in STEM significantly outperform peers in math and science readiness.
3) Few students meet the new, more rigorous ACT STEM College Readiness Benchmark, indicating unpreparedness for rigorous college STEM courses. Improving STEM education is critical for US competitiveness.
The document is ACT's annual report on college and career readiness among US high school graduates. Some key findings:
- 59% of the 2015 graduating class took the ACT, up from 57% in 2014.
- 40% met 3 or 4 ACT college readiness benchmarks, though 31% met none.
- Opportunities for improvement exist in reading and science where 10% scored within 2 points of the benchmark.
- 86% of students aspired to postsecondary education but only 69% enrolled in 2014, leaving room to close the aspirational gap.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
On May 1st, the Center for Innovative School Facilities hosted a group workshop led by Adam Rubin of New Visions for Public Schools. Adam led a discussion focusing on education reform and how it is driving the design, construction, and community and administrative infrastructure of school facilities.
Surveying administrative innovations in tertiary education: experience from A...EduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Anthony Arundel at the Public Conference “Innovation in education : What has changed in the classroom in the past decade?”.
Measuring innovation in education and understanding how it works is essential to improve the quality of the education sector. Monitoring systematically how pedagogical practices evolve would considerably increase the international education knowledge base. We need to examine whether, and how, practices are changing within classrooms and educational organisations and how students use learning resources. We should know much more about how teachers change their professional development practices, how schools change their ways to relate to parents, and, more generally, to what extent change and innovation are linked to better educational outcomes. This would help policy makers to better target interventions and resources, and get quick feedback on whether reforms do change educational practices as expected. This would enable us to better understand the role of innovation in education.
Engaging young children: Lessons from research about quality in Early Childho...EduSkills OECD
- Early childhood education is important for developing children's brains in their first three years and laying the foundation for later life outcomes. Investing in early education has high economic returns.
- Access to early childhood education has increased in most OECD countries, though disadvantaged children are less likely to participate. Attending early education programs is linked to better performance in science and other subjects.
- Factors like teacher qualifications and training, smaller class sizes, supportive working conditions, and quality monitoring systems can improve teacher-student interactions and positively impact child development. Further research is still needed to fully understand these relationships.
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...Robert Kelly
The document summarizes key findings from a survey of 325 Chief Academic Officers about how their institutions track data on underserved student success and outcomes. Some of the main findings include:
- Most institutions track graduation and retention rates, but fewer track data on high-impact practices and learning outcomes, and even fewer disaggregate those data by factors like race/ethnicity.
- Institutions are more likely to track and disaggregate data based on race/ethnicity than other factors like socioeconomic status.
- Over half of institutions have set goals to close gaps in retention and graduation rates specifically for different racial/ethnic groups.
- The majority have or are developing programs to build faculty capacity to support underserved
This presentation was given by Mercedes Miguel at at the Public Conference “Innovation in education : What has changed in the classroom in the past
decade?”.
Measuring innovation in education and understanding how it works is essential to improve the quality of the education sector. Monitoring systematically how pedagogical practices evolve would considerably increase the international education knowledge base. We need to examine whether, and how, practices are changing within classrooms and educational organisations and how students use learning resources. We should know much more about how teachers change their professional development practices, how schools change their ways to relate to parents, and, more generally, to what extent change and innovation are linked to better educational outcomes. This would help policy makers to better target interventions and resources, and get quick feedback on whether reforms do change educational practices as expected. This would enable us to better understand the role of innovation in education.
Wsu Greg Lobdell September 2008 Data And Decision MakingWSU Cougars
The document summarizes research on schools that have shown significant improvement in student achievement over time, known as "Schools of Distinction." The research identified several common characteristics among these schools. They exhibited a culture of high expectations for students, strong collaboration among staff, stable leadership focused on instruction, and frequent use of data to personalize teaching and target interventions. The schools also invested in ongoing professional development for teachers and monitored school improvement plans regularly.
The document is ACT's annual report on college and career readiness among US high school graduates. Some key findings:
- 59% of the 2015 graduating class took the ACT, up from 57% in 2014.
- 40% met 3 or 4 ACT college readiness benchmarks, though 31% met none.
- Opportunities for improvement exist in reading and science where 10% scored within 2 points of the benchmark.
- 86% of students aspired to postsecondary education but only 69% enrolled in 2014, leaving room to close the aspirational gap.
Optimistic About the Future, But How Well Prepared? College Students' Views o...Robert Kelly
Key findings from survey among 400 employers and 613 college students conducted in November and December 2014 for The Association of American Colleges and Universities by Hart Research Associates.
From November 13 to December 3, 2014, Hart Research conducted an online survey on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities among 613 college students—all of whom were ages 18 to 29 and within a year of obtaining a degree, or in the case of two-year college students, within a year of obtaining a degree or transferring to a four-year college. These students included 304 four-year public college seniors, 151 four-year private college seniors, and 158 community college students who plan to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
Prior to the survey, in September 2014, Hart Research conducted three focus groups among current college students. One group was convened in Waltham, Massachusetts, among seniors at private four-year colleges and universities. Two groups were held in Dallas, Texas—one group among seniors at public four-year colleges and universities and another group among students at community colleges who expect to receive their associate degree or transfer to a four-year college within the next 12 months.
The focus groups and survey were undertaken to explore college students’ views on what really matters in college, including what learning outcomes are most important to them personally and for their future success. The research also explored current college students’ sense of the job market today, their confidence in being able to secure a job, and how effectively they think that their college learning has prepared them for this. The research was designed to understand the learning outcomes students believe are most important to acquire to be able to succeed in today’s economy and how well they feel that their college or university has prepared them in these areas. It also explored their participation in various applied and project-based learning experiences, as well as their perceptions of the degree to which employers value these experiences when hiring recent college graduates.
The survey of college students was conducted in tandem with a survey of 400 employers, and explored many of the same topics to provide a comparison between these two audiences.
This report highlights key findings from the research among college students. Selected comparisons with employers are included where relevant. A report of selected findings from the survey of employers was released by AAC&U in January 2015.
On May 1st, the Center for Innovative School Facilities hosted a group workshop led by Adam Rubin of New Visions for Public Schools. Adam led a discussion focusing on education reform and how it is driving the design, construction, and community and administrative infrastructure of school facilities.
Surveying administrative innovations in tertiary education: experience from A...EduSkills OECD
This presentation was given by Anthony Arundel at the Public Conference “Innovation in education : What has changed in the classroom in the past decade?”.
Measuring innovation in education and understanding how it works is essential to improve the quality of the education sector. Monitoring systematically how pedagogical practices evolve would considerably increase the international education knowledge base. We need to examine whether, and how, practices are changing within classrooms and educational organisations and how students use learning resources. We should know much more about how teachers change their professional development practices, how schools change their ways to relate to parents, and, more generally, to what extent change and innovation are linked to better educational outcomes. This would help policy makers to better target interventions and resources, and get quick feedback on whether reforms do change educational practices as expected. This would enable us to better understand the role of innovation in education.
Engaging young children: Lessons from research about quality in Early Childho...EduSkills OECD
- Early childhood education is important for developing children's brains in their first three years and laying the foundation for later life outcomes. Investing in early education has high economic returns.
- Access to early childhood education has increased in most OECD countries, though disadvantaged children are less likely to participate. Attending early education programs is linked to better performance in science and other subjects.
- Factors like teacher qualifications and training, smaller class sizes, supportive working conditions, and quality monitoring systems can improve teacher-student interactions and positively impact child development. Further research is still needed to fully understand these relationships.
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...Robert Kelly
The document summarizes key findings from a survey of 325 Chief Academic Officers about how their institutions track data on underserved student success and outcomes. Some of the main findings include:
- Most institutions track graduation and retention rates, but fewer track data on high-impact practices and learning outcomes, and even fewer disaggregate those data by factors like race/ethnicity.
- Institutions are more likely to track and disaggregate data based on race/ethnicity than other factors like socioeconomic status.
- Over half of institutions have set goals to close gaps in retention and graduation rates specifically for different racial/ethnic groups.
- The majority have or are developing programs to build faculty capacity to support underserved
This presentation was given by Mercedes Miguel at at the Public Conference “Innovation in education : What has changed in the classroom in the past
decade?”.
Measuring innovation in education and understanding how it works is essential to improve the quality of the education sector. Monitoring systematically how pedagogical practices evolve would considerably increase the international education knowledge base. We need to examine whether, and how, practices are changing within classrooms and educational organisations and how students use learning resources. We should know much more about how teachers change their professional development practices, how schools change their ways to relate to parents, and, more generally, to what extent change and innovation are linked to better educational outcomes. This would help policy makers to better target interventions and resources, and get quick feedback on whether reforms do change educational practices as expected. This would enable us to better understand the role of innovation in education.
Wsu Greg Lobdell September 2008 Data And Decision MakingWSU Cougars
The document summarizes research on schools that have shown significant improvement in student achievement over time, known as "Schools of Distinction." The research identified several common characteristics among these schools. They exhibited a culture of high expectations for students, strong collaboration among staff, stable leadership focused on instruction, and frequent use of data to personalize teaching and target interventions. The schools also invested in ongoing professional development for teachers and monitored school improvement plans regularly.
This document provides an overview of the Common Core State Standards and the transition to Common Core-aligned assessments. It discusses how the Common Core requires higher standards that focus on deeper learning rather than superficial coverage of many topics. It also explains how assessments will change from primarily multiple choice to include more innovative item types like performance tasks and technology-enhanced questions to better measure skills like writing, problem-solving, and analytical thinking. The document provides resources and timelines to help educators understand what is required and plan their transition to meet Common Core requirements by the 2014-2015 deadline.
The document summarizes a presentation given at a Board of Higher Education meeting about achieving national leadership in education and research. It discusses goals of increasing college participation and completion rates, student learning outcomes, workforce alignment of degrees produced, and eliminating achievement gaps. It then previews a vision project assessing how well degrees and enrollments align with high-growth occupational fields and workforce needs in Massachusetts through metrics like graduation rates and employment of graduates.
The OECD School Resources Review examines how school resources can be effectively used to improve student outcomes. It takes a comprehensive look at how countries govern, distribute, and manage financial resources, infrastructure, human resources, and other resources. The review involves country background reports, country reviews, and thematic reports on topics like school funding. Its goal is to provide evidence-based policy advice and lessons learned across education systems to help countries get the best results from their investment in school resources.
Raising skills is critical to Portugal’s economic success and social well-being. As globalisation and digitalisation are transforming how people work, how societies function and how individuals interact, Portugal needs to equip its entire population with strong skills so that they can benefit from new opportunities.Portugal has put education and skills at the forefront of the political agenda for many years, but more than half of adults have not completed upper secondary education. With the population ageing rapidly and a growing skills divide between generations, Portugal needs to further strengthen its adult-learning system. To make change happen, Portugal will need a clear vision for the adult-learning system and a strong partnership between all stakeholders – all levels of government, education and training providers, employers, trade unions, the non-profit sector and learners.This report outlines areas where the accessibility, flexibility and quality of the adult-learning system can be improved, where governance and financing mechanisms can be strengthened, and provides examples of international and national good practice to help achieve these objectives. The report provides a series of concrete actions to help Portugal improve the adult-learning system and in turn enhance economic growth and social cohesion.
- The PISA 2018 assessment tested the reading, mathematics, and science skills of 15-year-old students in Malaysia and other countries. It found that Malaysian students scored lower than the OECD average in all three subjects.
- Socioeconomically disadvantaged students in Malaysia significantly underperformed their advantaged peers, mirroring the OECD average gap. However, disadvantage is not destiny, as some disadvantaged students achieved amongst the highest performance in Malaysia.
- Overall, Malaysia has seen improvements in mathematics and science scores since its first PISA assessment in 2009, with stronger gains amongst high-achieving students. However, reading performance remains similar to 2009 levels.
This presentation summarises the latest findings and updates about Agency data collection, which will take place annually from 2020 onwards. EASIE work continues to focus on developing procedures, indicators and outputs that provide countries with individual, comparative and aggregated data relating to all learners’ access to inclusive education.
The document proposes rethinking Oregon's education budget framework to better align funding with student outcomes. It recommends transforming the current system of separate K-12, community college and university budgets into a unified "0-20" continuum budget focused on achieving the state's 40-40-20 degree attainment goals. Key elements of the proposed approach include agreeing on common outcomes, transforming the delivery system, creating a unified data system, and producing a transparent, outcome-based budget to improve accountability and determine the best use of resources.
This document discusses statistics education in Nigeria based on a recent survey. It finds that while statistics is an important field, statistics education is still developing in Nigeria and not widely recognized as a separate discipline. The survey of 216 students and faculty at a major Nigerian university found that the majority were unaware that statistics education exists as its own field. The document calls for improving awareness of statistics education and establishing it as a separate subject in Nigerian universities in order to better develop the field and meet industry demand for statisticians.
The Vision Project is the strategic initiative through which the Massachusetts Public Higher Education System as come together to focus on producing the best-educated citizenry and workforce in the nation by achieving national leadership on seven key outcomes, including "College Participation," meaning the college readiness and college-going rates of the state's high school graduates. This presentation gives a preview of data showing where Massachusetts stands in college participation at the outset of the Vision Project and provides an overview of the people, projects, and deliverables involved in this outcome. More information at www.mass.edu/visionproject. Original presentation date: December 7, 2010
In our third annual Vision Project Report, Degrees of Urgency, we highlight the "Big Three" Completion Plan to increase the number of students graduating with degrees and certificates.
For more, visit www.mass.edu/visionproject
This document provides an overview of the proposed 2015-2016 education budget for Litchfield Public Schools. It includes a letter from the Superintendent outlining key aspects of the budget, which represents a $419,359 or 2.53% increase over the previous year. The budget focuses on continuing successful academic programs and opportunities for students, as well as investments in new math curriculum and supporting technology. Performance data is presented showing Litchfield students outperforming state and district averages on standardized tests.
The design of school learning environments can foster, or hinder, the teaching and learning of 21st century skills. By the time students complete their compulsory education, they will have spent many thousands of hours within school buildings. The same holds true for their teachers and school leaders who all too often are obliged to adapt to existing layouts in schools, rather than shape them actively.
The OECD School User Survey: Improving Learning Spaces Together gives voice to those who use schools on a daily basis. This unique OECD tool consists of three self-assessment questionnaires designed for students, teachers and school leaders. They can be used to collect and triangulate evidence on the actual use of learning spaces, as well as to solicit user perspectives.
Survey results can be used at the school level to support continuous improvement and the intelligent use or refurbishment of educational facilities. They can provide deeper insights into how physical learning environments shape teaching practices and affect students’ learning outcomes and well-being.
The Vision Project is the strategic initiative through which the Massachusetts Public Higher Education System as come together to focus on producing the best-educated citizenry and workforce in the nation by achieving national leadership on seven key outcomes, including Research and Economic Activity, meaning the research activity and resulting economic impact by the five campuses of the state's public research university, the University of Massachusetts. This presentation gives a preview of data showing where Massachusetts stands in these outcomes at the outset of the Vision Project. More information at www.mass.edu/visionproject. Original presentation date: May 3, 2011
Kindergarten Entry Assessments and Early Learning Challenge Grantselccollaboration
This document summarizes key aspects of developing Kindergarten Entry Assessments (KEAs) and their role in Early Learning Challenge Grants. It outlines the definition and purposes of KEAs, scoring criteria, types of assessment instruments, examples, and components of an effective KEA system. It also discusses developing a high quality plan and budget for implementing KEAs that can be used to inform instruction and close readiness gaps while meeting grant requirements.
The document discusses student flow models that can be used to project the number of additional credentials and degrees needed by states to meet goals for 2020 and 2025. It describes the inputs, throughput rates, and outcomes that are used in models to estimate the impacts of improved performance. The models can help identify strategies to close educational attainment gaps and estimate the costs of achieving certain results.
This presentation was given by Diana Koroleva at the Public Conference “Innovation in education : What has changed in the classroom in the past decade?”.
Measuring innovation in education and understanding how it works is essential to improve the quality of the education sector. Monitoring systematically how pedagogical practices evolve would considerably increase the international education knowledge base. We need to examine whether, and how, practices are changing within classrooms and educational organisations and how students use learning resources. We should know much more about how teachers change their professional development practices, how schools change their ways to relate to parents, and, more generally, to what extent change and innovation are linked to better educational outcomes. This would help policy makers to better target interventions and resources, and get quick feedback on whether reforms do change educational practices as expected. This would enable us to better understand the role of innovation in education.
The document provides an overview of the PISA 2012 results, including:
- Shanghai-China had the highest scores in mathematics, 119 points above the OECD average.
- 13% of students across OECD countries performed at the top level in mathematics, compared to 55% in Shanghai-China.
- Between 2003-2012, 25 countries improved their mathematics performance, while Italy, Poland and Portugal increased their top performers and reduced low performers.
- Shanghai-China, Hong Kong-China, Singapore, Japan and Finland were the top performers in reading and science.
This document discusses how GIS can be used to advance STEM education. It provides several examples of how GIS has been integrated into formal education, including:
1) A high school math teacher in Kansas who has students use GIS to solve real-world problems, such as locating wells in Haiti to provide clean water.
2) Texas students who used GIS to track reported cases of H1N1 flu across counties in their state.
3) A summer course for high school students that teaches intensive GIS skills and applications.
The document provides reasons why more students are taking the ACT exam instead of the SAT. It notes that in 2016 the SAT shifted its focus to testing college and career readiness, which has always been the ACT's focus. It also states that the ACT surveys thousands of educators to ensure it continually measures the skills needed for college courses, while the SAT relies on a smaller group of experts. Additionally, the ACT is the only exam that includes a science section and score.
National Research Initiatives 2-page Info SheetSteve Junge
ACT is a nonprofit organization committed to conducting research on key issues in education and career development to inform policymakers and help individuals make decisions about their future. The Condition of College & Career Readiness reports provide national and state data on academic preparedness for college based on ACT test scores for high school graduates each year. The reports also analyze student characteristics to identify groups that lack access to educational resources. The Condition of STEM report reviews readiness in math and science for students interested in STEM careers. The College Choice Report series provides insights into the previous year's ACT test takers' college preferences, enrollment patterns, and persistence.
This document provides an overview of the Common Core State Standards and the transition to Common Core-aligned assessments. It discusses how the Common Core requires higher standards that focus on deeper learning rather than superficial coverage of many topics. It also explains how assessments will change from primarily multiple choice to include more innovative item types like performance tasks and technology-enhanced questions to better measure skills like writing, problem-solving, and analytical thinking. The document provides resources and timelines to help educators understand what is required and plan their transition to meet Common Core requirements by the 2014-2015 deadline.
The document summarizes a presentation given at a Board of Higher Education meeting about achieving national leadership in education and research. It discusses goals of increasing college participation and completion rates, student learning outcomes, workforce alignment of degrees produced, and eliminating achievement gaps. It then previews a vision project assessing how well degrees and enrollments align with high-growth occupational fields and workforce needs in Massachusetts through metrics like graduation rates and employment of graduates.
The OECD School Resources Review examines how school resources can be effectively used to improve student outcomes. It takes a comprehensive look at how countries govern, distribute, and manage financial resources, infrastructure, human resources, and other resources. The review involves country background reports, country reviews, and thematic reports on topics like school funding. Its goal is to provide evidence-based policy advice and lessons learned across education systems to help countries get the best results from their investment in school resources.
Raising skills is critical to Portugal’s economic success and social well-being. As globalisation and digitalisation are transforming how people work, how societies function and how individuals interact, Portugal needs to equip its entire population with strong skills so that they can benefit from new opportunities.Portugal has put education and skills at the forefront of the political agenda for many years, but more than half of adults have not completed upper secondary education. With the population ageing rapidly and a growing skills divide between generations, Portugal needs to further strengthen its adult-learning system. To make change happen, Portugal will need a clear vision for the adult-learning system and a strong partnership between all stakeholders – all levels of government, education and training providers, employers, trade unions, the non-profit sector and learners.This report outlines areas where the accessibility, flexibility and quality of the adult-learning system can be improved, where governance and financing mechanisms can be strengthened, and provides examples of international and national good practice to help achieve these objectives. The report provides a series of concrete actions to help Portugal improve the adult-learning system and in turn enhance economic growth and social cohesion.
- The PISA 2018 assessment tested the reading, mathematics, and science skills of 15-year-old students in Malaysia and other countries. It found that Malaysian students scored lower than the OECD average in all three subjects.
- Socioeconomically disadvantaged students in Malaysia significantly underperformed their advantaged peers, mirroring the OECD average gap. However, disadvantage is not destiny, as some disadvantaged students achieved amongst the highest performance in Malaysia.
- Overall, Malaysia has seen improvements in mathematics and science scores since its first PISA assessment in 2009, with stronger gains amongst high-achieving students. However, reading performance remains similar to 2009 levels.
This presentation summarises the latest findings and updates about Agency data collection, which will take place annually from 2020 onwards. EASIE work continues to focus on developing procedures, indicators and outputs that provide countries with individual, comparative and aggregated data relating to all learners’ access to inclusive education.
The document proposes rethinking Oregon's education budget framework to better align funding with student outcomes. It recommends transforming the current system of separate K-12, community college and university budgets into a unified "0-20" continuum budget focused on achieving the state's 40-40-20 degree attainment goals. Key elements of the proposed approach include agreeing on common outcomes, transforming the delivery system, creating a unified data system, and producing a transparent, outcome-based budget to improve accountability and determine the best use of resources.
This document discusses statistics education in Nigeria based on a recent survey. It finds that while statistics is an important field, statistics education is still developing in Nigeria and not widely recognized as a separate discipline. The survey of 216 students and faculty at a major Nigerian university found that the majority were unaware that statistics education exists as its own field. The document calls for improving awareness of statistics education and establishing it as a separate subject in Nigerian universities in order to better develop the field and meet industry demand for statisticians.
The Vision Project is the strategic initiative through which the Massachusetts Public Higher Education System as come together to focus on producing the best-educated citizenry and workforce in the nation by achieving national leadership on seven key outcomes, including "College Participation," meaning the college readiness and college-going rates of the state's high school graduates. This presentation gives a preview of data showing where Massachusetts stands in college participation at the outset of the Vision Project and provides an overview of the people, projects, and deliverables involved in this outcome. More information at www.mass.edu/visionproject. Original presentation date: December 7, 2010
In our third annual Vision Project Report, Degrees of Urgency, we highlight the "Big Three" Completion Plan to increase the number of students graduating with degrees and certificates.
For more, visit www.mass.edu/visionproject
This document provides an overview of the proposed 2015-2016 education budget for Litchfield Public Schools. It includes a letter from the Superintendent outlining key aspects of the budget, which represents a $419,359 or 2.53% increase over the previous year. The budget focuses on continuing successful academic programs and opportunities for students, as well as investments in new math curriculum and supporting technology. Performance data is presented showing Litchfield students outperforming state and district averages on standardized tests.
The design of school learning environments can foster, or hinder, the teaching and learning of 21st century skills. By the time students complete their compulsory education, they will have spent many thousands of hours within school buildings. The same holds true for their teachers and school leaders who all too often are obliged to adapt to existing layouts in schools, rather than shape them actively.
The OECD School User Survey: Improving Learning Spaces Together gives voice to those who use schools on a daily basis. This unique OECD tool consists of three self-assessment questionnaires designed for students, teachers and school leaders. They can be used to collect and triangulate evidence on the actual use of learning spaces, as well as to solicit user perspectives.
Survey results can be used at the school level to support continuous improvement and the intelligent use or refurbishment of educational facilities. They can provide deeper insights into how physical learning environments shape teaching practices and affect students’ learning outcomes and well-being.
The Vision Project is the strategic initiative through which the Massachusetts Public Higher Education System as come together to focus on producing the best-educated citizenry and workforce in the nation by achieving national leadership on seven key outcomes, including Research and Economic Activity, meaning the research activity and resulting economic impact by the five campuses of the state's public research university, the University of Massachusetts. This presentation gives a preview of data showing where Massachusetts stands in these outcomes at the outset of the Vision Project. More information at www.mass.edu/visionproject. Original presentation date: May 3, 2011
Kindergarten Entry Assessments and Early Learning Challenge Grantselccollaboration
This document summarizes key aspects of developing Kindergarten Entry Assessments (KEAs) and their role in Early Learning Challenge Grants. It outlines the definition and purposes of KEAs, scoring criteria, types of assessment instruments, examples, and components of an effective KEA system. It also discusses developing a high quality plan and budget for implementing KEAs that can be used to inform instruction and close readiness gaps while meeting grant requirements.
The document discusses student flow models that can be used to project the number of additional credentials and degrees needed by states to meet goals for 2020 and 2025. It describes the inputs, throughput rates, and outcomes that are used in models to estimate the impacts of improved performance. The models can help identify strategies to close educational attainment gaps and estimate the costs of achieving certain results.
This presentation was given by Diana Koroleva at the Public Conference “Innovation in education : What has changed in the classroom in the past decade?”.
Measuring innovation in education and understanding how it works is essential to improve the quality of the education sector. Monitoring systematically how pedagogical practices evolve would considerably increase the international education knowledge base. We need to examine whether, and how, practices are changing within classrooms and educational organisations and how students use learning resources. We should know much more about how teachers change their professional development practices, how schools change their ways to relate to parents, and, more generally, to what extent change and innovation are linked to better educational outcomes. This would help policy makers to better target interventions and resources, and get quick feedback on whether reforms do change educational practices as expected. This would enable us to better understand the role of innovation in education.
The document provides an overview of the PISA 2012 results, including:
- Shanghai-China had the highest scores in mathematics, 119 points above the OECD average.
- 13% of students across OECD countries performed at the top level in mathematics, compared to 55% in Shanghai-China.
- Between 2003-2012, 25 countries improved their mathematics performance, while Italy, Poland and Portugal increased their top performers and reduced low performers.
- Shanghai-China, Hong Kong-China, Singapore, Japan and Finland were the top performers in reading and science.
This document discusses how GIS can be used to advance STEM education. It provides several examples of how GIS has been integrated into formal education, including:
1) A high school math teacher in Kansas who has students use GIS to solve real-world problems, such as locating wells in Haiti to provide clean water.
2) Texas students who used GIS to track reported cases of H1N1 flu across counties in their state.
3) A summer course for high school students that teaches intensive GIS skills and applications.
The document provides reasons why more students are taking the ACT exam instead of the SAT. It notes that in 2016 the SAT shifted its focus to testing college and career readiness, which has always been the ACT's focus. It also states that the ACT surveys thousands of educators to ensure it continually measures the skills needed for college courses, while the SAT relies on a smaller group of experts. Additionally, the ACT is the only exam that includes a science section and score.
National Research Initiatives 2-page Info SheetSteve Junge
ACT is a nonprofit organization committed to conducting research on key issues in education and career development to inform policymakers and help individuals make decisions about their future. The Condition of College & Career Readiness reports provide national and state data on academic preparedness for college based on ACT test scores for high school graduates each year. The reports also analyze student characteristics to identify groups that lack access to educational resources. The Condition of STEM report reviews readiness in math and science for students interested in STEM careers. The College Choice Report series provides insights into the previous year's ACT test takers' college preferences, enrollment patterns, and persistence.
1 Delivering STEM Education Through Career And Technical Education Schools An...Sean Flores
This document discusses delivering STEM education through career and technical education (CTE) schools and programs. It describes different CTE delivery systems including regional career tech centers, CTE high schools, and CTE offered within traditional high schools. It provides examples of each type of school that focus on STEM subjects like engineering and health sciences. The document also discusses programmatic approaches within CTE like career academies and programs of study that organize curriculum around career clusters including STEM. Research shows these CTE models can provide strong academic preparation for postsecondary education and careers while also improving economic outcomes for students.
1) The study examined equity group students' pathways through STEM fields from school to employment. It found lower STEM achievement and participation for equity groups like low SES and regional students in school.
2) Two factors predicted students' likelihood of entering university STEM fields - instrumental motivation in math, seeing its usefulness, and positive math self-concept. These were stronger predictors for equity groups.
3) The study recommends improving instrumental motivation in math for equity students early in schooling, demonstrating math's practical importance, and increasing work-integrated learning opportunities in STEM university programs.
RHS Explore and Plan Parent Night information presentedjuliedecember
The document discusses how student scores on the EXPLORE and PLAN assessments in middle school and high school predict success on the ACT college entrance exam and readiness for college-level coursework. It provides details on the content and format of the ACT exams and explains how districts can use EXPLORE and PLAN results to target instruction to improve student performance on the ACT.
The document provides summaries of several research reports and publications from ACT, including:
1) A report examining a more holistic view of college and career readiness that focuses on both core academics and noncognitive skills.
2) A review of the 2014 graduating class in the context of STEM fields to determine student interest and readiness in math and science.
3) A highlight of the college and career readiness of the 2014 ACT-tested graduating class, which is updated annually.
4) A report identifying the enrollment status and migration patterns of 2013 ACT-tested graduates attending two-year and four-year colleges.
This document provides an overview of STEM and STEAM education. It defines STEM as focusing on science, technology, engineering and mathematics, while STEAM denotes the inclusion of arts. STEM education integrates these subjects through rigorous, hands-on learning involving real-world tasks and projects. It provides students with critical thinking skills needed for college and careers. The document outlines Georgia's STEM certification process and criteria, which requires teacher training, partnerships, and showing improved student performance in math and science.
This document provides an overview of STEM and STEAM education. It defines STEM as focusing on science, technology, engineering and mathematics, while STEAM denotes the inclusion of arts. STEM education integrates these subjects through rigorous, hands-on learning involving real-world tasks and ongoing teacher professional development. It aims to improve student achievement in areas like critical thinking and workforce skills. The document outlines Georgia's STEM certification process and criteria for K-12 schools to achieve certification.
This document investigates factors influencing the number of students pursuing physics at higher levels of education. It identifies key factors such as perceived lack of career relevance, difficulty achieving good grades, lack of encouragement from adults, declining student interest in lessons, and lack of appeal to female students. The document also describes ways to address these issues, such as improving career awareness, using varied teaching methods to engage different learners, and combating unconscious teacher biases. It includes the results of a student questionnaire on attitudes to physics and provides an example lesson plan aimed at making physics more appealing and engaging.
The document provides information about STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education from various sources. It includes multiple choice questions about Maryland's STEM vision statement, recommendations from a STEM task force, statistics about STEM degrees and jobs, and priorities identified by President Obama for improving STEM education. One question asks which statement is not identified as a priority in Maryland's Race to the Top application, and the answer is increasing student achievement through innovative STEM instruction across the curriculum.
This study examined the ability of a college aptitude test (CAT) and high school GPA to predict students' academic performance in their first year of college, as measured by first-year GPA. The study found that both CAT scores and high school GPA were positively correlated with first-year college GPA. Multiple regression analyses also showed that CAT scores alone were a significant predictor of first-year GPA, explaining 37.3% of variance. Adding high school GPA to the model further improved predictive power, explaining 47% of variance in first-year GPA. The results support the use of both CAT scores and high school GPA in admission decisions and predicting students' future academic performance.
The document discusses the importance of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education and professional development for STEM teachers. It states that STEM and innovation are critical to economic growth, global competitiveness, and national security. However, many US students are unprepared for STEM careers due to poor math and science education. In Maryland specifically, only one-third of high school graduates complete necessary coursework to enroll in college STEM programs. The document calls for collective efforts from educators, government, and businesses to better prepare students for STEM careers through improved STEM education.
The 2019 Accenture in Ireland, What Now For STEM?, report shows there is a welcomed consensus about the importance of learning STEM subjects in schools, but confusion about its implementation and long-term life benefits. The report points to the need to bring a better understanding of STEM-driven jobs
into the classroom. Read our findings in the full report here.
The document discusses the Tech Museum's strategy for grant and cooperative agreements from 2008-2012. It outlines the museum's mission to inspire learning about technologies through educational programming. The strategy focuses on supporting STEM education, with priorities around underserved populations like Title 1 K-12 students, women and minorities. It discusses developing community partnerships and innovative programs to increase engagement. Regional outcomes of the museum's STEM programs are listed as aiding student mastery of science concepts, motivating pursuit of STEM careers, and providing teachers with resources and assessment tools.
The document outlines a collective impact initiative called the Road Map Project aimed at dramatically improving student achievement from early childhood through college/career in South Seattle and South King County. It discusses goals of ensuring students are healthy and ready for kindergarten, supported and successful in school, graduate from high school college and career ready, and earn a college degree or career credential. It also outlines strategies for the initiative including collecting and reporting data, engaging the community, and aligning investments.
On October 8, 2014, Dr. Ann Cavallo from the University of Texas at Arlington and Gregg Fleisher from the National Math + Science Initiative joined us at the North Texas Commission offices to discuss STEM Education & North Texas. The North Texas Commission Webinar Series, Topic: North Texas, is presented by Verizon.
A Scholarship Model For Student Recruitment And Retention In STEM DisciplinesRenee Lewis
This document describes a scholarship program called the Computer Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Scholarship (CSEMS) program at Wright State University aimed at increasing recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups in STEM fields. The program works with a pre-engineering program called Wright STEPP to identify and support minority and female students beginning in middle school. The CSEMS program provides scholarships, career workshops, internship opportunities, and academic/social support to help students succeed in STEM majors and careers. Evaluation of the program looks at GPA, retention rates, and the number of students graduating with STEM degrees.
This document discusses the role of business schools in STEM education. It notes that STEM jobs are expected to grow significantly by 2018, especially in computing fields. However, many students lose interest in STEM fields before graduating high school. The document also outlines the US government's strategic plan to improve STEM instruction, engagement, and degree attainment. It argues that business schools can benefit from participating in STEM through new degree programs, partnerships, and visibility. Examples provided include the Professional Science Masters, which combines STEM and business training. Key questions are raised about how business schools can better engage with the national STEM agenda.
Dow Chemical wanted to upgrade the skills of its process technicians to match advancing technology and replace retiring workers. It partnered with Brazosport College to develop a comprehensive workforce development plan using WorkKeys skills assessments. WorkKeys identified the foundational and technical skills required for process technician roles. Over 1,400 technicians have taken WorkKeys assessments, and training is provided to address any skills gaps. As a result, Dow now has a standardized system to assess skills and target training to individual needs, which it is implementing worldwide.
Northrop Grumman Ship Systems implemented WorkKeys at its Pascagoula, MS shipyard to assess and improve the foundational skills of incumbent employees. WorkKeys job profiling identified skill gaps for over 1,200 shipfitters, welders, burners, and grinders, who received individualized training plans. This led to a 28% reduction in turnover, significantly improved work quality, and millions saved from fewer layoffs and higher training completion rates. Pleased with the results, Northrop Grumman expanded WorkKeys to additional trades across the company.
Owensboro Medical Health System implemented a skills enhancement program using WorkKeys assessments to identify employees' skill levels and target instruction to increase those skills. Over 600 employees participated, with many improving their skills or transferring to higher-paying positions. The program helped reduce employee turnover by 32% and renewed focus on education.
WorkKeys assessments were used by several companies to improve productivity and reduce turnover. At a trucking company, using WorkKeys assessments to select data entry staff reduced turnover by 85% and cut past-due bills in half. A metal fabrication company saw turnover drop to 12% after linking promotions to foundational skill levels assessed by WorkKeys. A food producer cut training time by 50% after profiling jobs and requiring WorkKeys, saving $2,500-$3,700 per employee. A social services agency saw positive effects on turnover and productivity after analyzing positions and closing skills gaps using WorkKeys assessments.
Energizer, a battery manufacturing company in North Carolina, implemented WorkKeys skills assessments to hire more qualified workers aligned with their lean manufacturing standards. By assessing candidates' skills in areas like reading, math, and problem solving, Energizer reduced training time and costs from hiring mismatched employees. Turnover went to zero in the first three months as better hires stayed in their roles longer. The new process allowed Energizer to adhere more closely to lean principles of efficiency while increasing productivity and decreasing errors.
1) John Deere has over 30,000 technicians in North American agricultural dealerships who sell and repair its farm equipment. It developed centralized training programs to develop the skills of these technicians.
2) A study by Training Evaluation Services examined John Deere's Electrical/Electronic Certification training course, which aims to improve technician skills in diagnosing and repairing electrical and electronic issues.
3) The study found the training reduced diagnostic and repair times, parts waste, and service returns by 20%, providing John Deere a return of $1.34 for every $1 spent on training in the US and $1.55 return in Canada.
Chicago Public Schools worked with local businesses to better prepare high school students for local jobs after graduation. They surveyed businesses to determine necessary skills for entry-level positions. Students then took ACT's WorkKeys exams to assess their skill levels in areas like applied math and reading. Students who needed improvement used KeyTrain courses to close gaps. This allowed the schools to adjust curricula to meet business needs while giving students credentials to validate their workforce readiness upon graduating.
The document discusses whether students should retake the ACT exam. It notes that over a million students who took the ACT last year had taken it before. It suggests students ask themselves questions about their preparation and performance before deciding to retake. These include whether they felt prepared, healthy, understood instructions, and free from test anxiety. It also suggests checking if scores meet requirements for desired schools, programs, and scholarships. The document concludes by offering advice on preparing better if retaking, such as reviewing standards, taking more relevant classes, and using test prep resources. Statistics show that of students who retook the ACT, 57% increased their composite score, 21% saw no change, and 22% decreased.
After completing the ACT test, the document provides options for students to retake the test, share their scores with colleges and scholarship agencies, connect with potential colleges using their ACT Profile, understand their scores and how to access their score report. It encourages students to relax after the test and informs them that score reports are typically released within 3-8 weeks of the test date.
The document provides tips and information for students taking the ACT test, including eating a healthy breakfast, getting a good night's sleep, using test prep tools to review content, and printing their ticket and bringing required materials like pencils and an approved calculator to the test center. It emphasizes not worrying and doing their best on the test, as there are no penalties for guessing, and exploring future career and college options by creating a profile account after taking the test.
The document summarizes key findings from a report on college major selection among ACT-tested 2013 high school graduates. It finds that: 1) While most selected a planned major, only 40% were very sure of their choice and higher-achieving students were less sure; 2) Only 1/3 chose a major well-aligned with their interests, with lower-achieving and first-generation students less likely to do so; and 3) 62% wanted help with education/career plans, including many who were sure of their major. It provides recommendations for colleges to consider students' interests and major fit during recruitment and advising.
5621 ACT Engage Case Study UofM Roch_WebWill Valet
The University of Minnesota Rochester used ACT Engage assessments to better understand their students' academic behaviors and needs. The assessments measured motivation, social engagement, and self-regulation, which are important factors in student success along with academic abilities. Using ACT Engage results, UMR was able to develop data-driven interventions and curriculum adjustments to help students succeed, rather than relying on assumptions. Faculty found the assessments provided a holistic view of students that improved learning outcomes. UMR now collects ACT Engage data annually to continually enhance its learning-centered approach.
The document discusses how Envision, a global education company, uses ACT Engage assessments to help middle school students prepare for 21st century careers. The assessments measure academic behaviors like motivation, social engagement, and self-regulation. Students take the assessments and use the results to set career goals and identify skills needed for future careers. Envision plans to expand use of ACT tools to more of its programs to further support students in developing career readiness.
3. Key Findings
from the National Condition of STEM 2015 Report
This report shows that, over the past several years, about half of US high school graduates have expressed interest in STEM
majors and careers. Meanwhile, college readiness levels in math and science are higher for STEM-interested students than
for ACT-tested students overall (as stated in the ACT Condition of College & Career Readiness 2015 report, released in
August 2015).
This is particularly true among students with an interest that is both expressed (planning to pursue a STEM major/career) and
measured (having a high ACT Interest Inventory score in STEM areas). Interest in Computer Science and Mathematics majors
and occupations is trending up slightly, while interest in Medical and Health majors and occupations is trending down slightly.
Nevertheless, based on the percent meeting the new ACT STEM College Readiness Benchmark, far too many
STEM‑interested students are not well prepared to succeed in the type of rigorous college math and science coursework
required of STEM majors. These findings echo those of the national Condition of College & Career Readiness 2015 report,
which issued a call to action to the entire education community, urging that more work should be done to improve college and
career readiness for all students. We should commend the efforts of STEM councils and leaders across the country to
increase awareness and interest in STEM among young people while expanding efforts to increase college and career
readiness levels in STEM areas.
Among the key findings of this report:
1. Interest in STEM remains high. Of the more than 1.9 million graduates who took the ACT in 2015, nearly 940,000—or
49%—had an interest in STEM. This shows that STEM initiatives and the awareness created around STEM majors and
careers continues to be effective. However, the challenge is to translate this interest into pursuit and completion of STEM
majors.
• Five-year trends show the percentage of students interested in Computer Science and Mathematics majors has
increased by 2%, while there has been a 3% decrease in the percentage of students choosing Medical and Health
majors.
• Choices of specific majors within each area are remarkably consistent from last year.
2. Students with STEM interest that is both expressed and measured outperformed their peers. Consistent with
previous years, students who demonstrate both an expressed and measured interest in STEM outperformed their peers
in terms of college readiness. Such students had Benchmark attainment percentages that were 16 points above all
ACT‑tested 2015 graduates in both math and science. Because students may not be able to articulate (much less pursue)
interests in STEM early in their academic careers, introducing students to STEM majors and occupations at an early age
will go a long way toward planting the seeds of interest necessary to pursue those areas later on.
3. For the first time, students are measured against the ACT STEM College Readiness Benchmark. Through
research, ACT has established a Benchmark that puts an even stronger emphasis on the need for students to use every
opportunity in preparation to pursue a STEM major or occupation. The ACT STEM College Readiness Benchmark is based
on more rigorous entry-level college courses than the established math and science Benchmarks, and rates of attainment
are extremely low on the more strenuous ACT STEM College Readiness Benchmark. Recent ACT research noted that
students meeting the STEM Benchmark have a 49% chance of attaining a STEM degree in six years, compared to only
17% of those who fall below this Benchmark.
4. Interest in teaching STEM subject areas continues to lag. Despite a larger number of ACT-tested students this year,
which translates to a larger number of STEM-interested students, the number of 2015 graduates interested in teaching
math and science was lower than in 2014. This is an alarming finding, as meeting the demand for well-prepared teachers
in STEM areas is critical to the future of our country.
3
4. National STEM Report
Attainment of College and Career Readiness
Overall STEM Interest
• Between 2011 and
2015, the percent
of students
interested in STEM
increased by 1%.
Student STEM Interest Trends: 2011–2015
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Percent Nation 48% 48% 48% 49% 49%
N Count Nation 780,541 804,507 868,194 899,684 939,049
Overall STEM Interest
• 939,049 graduates have an interest in STEM.
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Subject
68
50 49
45
33
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science All Four
Subjects
Percent
Expressed and Measured Interest
• 320,030 graduates have an expressed and measured
interest in STEM, which is 34% of the overall interest.
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Subject
77
59 58
54
42
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science All Four
Subjects
Percent
Expressed Interest Only
• 453,717 graduates have an expressed interest in
STEM, which is 48% of the overall interest.
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Subject
64
45 46
40
29
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science All Four
Subjects
Percent
Measured Interest Only
• 165,302 graduates have a measured interest in STEM,
which is 18% of the overall interest.
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Subject
65
48
40 39
27
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science All Four
Subjects
Percent
Note: Percents in this report may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
4 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
5. Overall STEM Interest (N = 939,049)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
68
50 49 45
9
12
8 14
23
37 43 41
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
26
14 13 13
33
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Expressed and Measured Interest (N = 320,030)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
77
59 58 54
8
12
8 14
16
29 34 32
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
19
13 13 14
42
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
National STEM Report
Attainment of College and Career Readiness
5
6. National STEM Report
Attainment of College and Career Readiness
Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
* Race/ethnicity categories changed for the 2010–2011 academic year to reflect updated US Department of Education reporting requirements.
45
54
32
29
63
22
15
48
57
39
35
74
25
18
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 113,142 N = 7,597 N = 54,062 N = 145,667 N = 2,905 N = 528,084 N = 38,529
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
54
44
50
40
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 464,177 N = 470,518
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
55
62
43
38
69
27
22
56
64
51
43
79
30
25
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 27,442 N = 2,537 N = 20,950 N = 48,324 N = 856 N = 191,201 N = 13,624
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
65
51
62
48
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 152,203 N = 166,763
6 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
7. Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
10
10
36
62
56
11
9
40
68
61
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 283,643 N = 149,380 N = 390,425 N = 37,097 N = 13,711
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
22
34
36
54
65
70
26
37
39
58
71
75
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 63,878 N = 125,765 N = 233,044 N = 93,782 N = 139,542 N = 179,939
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
15
13
42
68
62
15
12
45
73
66
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 137,041 N = 53,453 N = 112,602 N = 7,531 N = 2,085
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
30
43
44
62
72
77
34
45
47
66
76
81
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 27,900 N = 51,066 N = 88,489 N = 33,545 N = 48,475 N = 56,250
National STEM Report
Attainment of College and Career Readiness
7
8. Science
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
• Between 2011 and
2015, the percent
of students
interested in STEM
decreased by 1%.
Student STEM Interest Trends: 2011–2015
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Percent Nation 23% 23% 22% 22% 22%
N Count Nation 176,490 183,857 195,098 200,461 208,520
Overall STEM Interest (N = 208,520)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
75
59
53 51
8
12
9 14
17
29
38 35
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
20
13 14 14
39
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Expressed and Measured Interest (N = 88,410)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
81
65 61 59
7
11
8 14
13
24
31 27
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
15
11 13 15
46
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
8 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
9. Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
* Race/ethnicity categories changed for the 2010–2011 academic year to reflect updated US Department of Education reporting requirements.
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
50
58
36
34
69
25
20
51
59
44
39
79
26
23
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 18,087 N = 1,594 N = 12,512 N = 30,852 N = 578 N = 124,031 N = 8,951
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
57
51
55
49
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 88,358 N = 119,433
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
58
65
43
42
73
32
26
59
66
50
47
82
32
29
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 6,612 N = 550 N = 5,990 N = 12,700 N = 240 N = 54,035 N = 3,770
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
65
58
63
56
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 37,462 N = 50,727
Science
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
9
10. Science
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
11
11
39
65
63
10
9
39
68
67
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 78,402 N = 31,687 N = 75,916 N = 5,838 N = 1,599
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
28
39
41
57
69
74
29
40
42
60
71
78
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 18,827 N = 31,279 N = 52,358 N = 19,190 N = 28,999 N = 33,765
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
12
13
43
69
68
14
11
44
72
71
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 43,361 N = 14,028 N = 27,245 N = 1,340 N = 287
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
35
47
48
65
74
79
38
48
49
67
77
82
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 9,554 N = 15,351 N = 24,388 N = 8,532 N = 12,553 N = 13,605
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
10 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
11. * The “overall STEM interest” counts and percents do not include the “measured only interest” students, as they did not choose a STEM major
or occupation.
Science
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
Science Majors/Occupations
National N Counts and Percents
Overall STEM Interest*
Expressed and
Measured Only
N Count Percent N Count Percent
Agronomy and Crop Science 1,569 1 549 1
Animal Sciences 8,995 6 3,519 4
Astronomy 3,429 2 2,350 3
Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology 1,724 1 879 1
Biochemistry and Biophysics 19,021 12 12,219 14
Biology, General 34,592 22 20,779 24
Cell/Cellular Biology 8,066 5 4,914 6
Chemistry 12,331 8 7,770 9
Ecology 1,909 1 1,160 1
Environmental Science 2,480 2 1,232 1
Food Sciences and Technology 1,368 1 369 0
Forestry 1,749 1 537 1
Genetics 4,972 3 3,186 4
Geological and Earth Sciences 2,661 2 1,615 2
Horticulture Science 596 0 267 0
Marine/Aquatic Biology 13,033 8 7,799 9
Microbiology and Immunology 4,026 3 2,771 3
Natural Resources Conservation, General 1,869 1 788 1
Natural Resources Management 789 1 268 0
Physical Sciences, General 5,601 4 3,077 3
Physics 6,299 4 3,965 4
Science Education 1,146 1 606 1
Wildlife and Wildlands Management 4,592 3 1,615 2
Zoology 10,993 7 6,176 7
Totals 153,810 88,410
11
12. Computer Science and Mathematics
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
• Between 2011 and
2015, the percent
of students
interested in STEM
increased by 2%.
Student STEM Interest Trends: 2011–2015
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Percent Nation 9% 9% 9% 10% 11%
N Count Nation 73,298 74,959 82,197 89,755 101,144
Overall STEM Interest (N = 101,144)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
67
50 52
46
9
11 8
13
25
38 41 41
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
27
13 12 13
35
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Expressed and Measured Interest (N = 19,159)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
78
64 64 61
7
10 7 12
15
26 28 26
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
16
10 11
14
48
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
12 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
13. Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
* Race/ethnicity categories changed for the 2010–2011 academic year to reflect updated US Department of Education reporting requirements.
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
48
56
31
29
61
22
15
52
61
36
36
75
25
17
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 12,336 N = 694 N = 7,414 N = 14,875 N = 280 N = 55,350 N = 4,049
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
54
46
49
40
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 71,851 N = 28,726
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
63
69
49
42
71
35
26
64
70
51
50
82
32
29
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 1,466 N = 106 N = 1,529 N = 2,586 N = 37 N = 11,554 N = 823
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
65 6362
57
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 16,408 N = 2,686
Computer Science and Mathematics
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
13
14. Computer Science and Mathematics
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
12
14
43
66
58
14
13
48
74
65
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 12,369 N = 17,699 N = 54,446 N = 5,044 N = 2,585
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
25
38
39
55
67
70
29
41
43
60
73
74
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 6,230 N = 12,935 N = 24,916 N = 9,290 N = 14,490 N = 20,276
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
23
26
57
76
72
20
21
59
81
78
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 3,146 N = 3,936 N = 10,591 N = 630 N = 280
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
40
54
53
67
76
80
44
55
56
70
80
84
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 1,662 N = 3,102 N = 5,429 N = 1,835 N = 2,812 N = 3,325
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
14 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
15. * The “overall STEM interest” counts and percents do not include the “measured only interest” students, as they did not choose a STEM major
or occupation.
Computer Science and Mathematics
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
Computer Science and Mathematics
Majors/Occupations
National N Counts and Percents
Overall STEM Interest*
Expressed and
Measured Only
N Count Percent N Count Percent
Actuarial Science 1,201 2 128 1
Applied Mathematics 2,210 3 506 3
Business/Management Quantitative Methods, General 6,967 9 636 3
Computer and Information Sciences, General 9,865 13 2,935 15
Computer Network/Telecommunications 3,477 5 820 4
Computer Science and Programming 27,523 36 9,338 49
Computer Software and Media Application 7,724 10 1,875 10
Computer System Administration 1,674 2 382 2
Data Management Technology 593 1 115 1
Information Science 915 1 237 1
Management Information Systems 1,923 3 189 1
Mathematics Education 4,165 6 525 3
Mathematics, General 4,045 5 912 5
Statistics 1,329 2 199 1
Webpage Design 1,942 3 362 2
Totals 75,553 19,159
15
16. Medical and Health
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
• Between 2011 and
2015, the percent
of students
interested in STEM
decreased by 3%.
Student STEM Interest Trends: 2011–2015
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Percent Nation 45% 45% 44% 43% 42%
N Count Nation 350,458 361,047 383,555 388,653 393,085
Overall STEM Interest (N = 393,085)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
66
46 41 38
10
14
9 16
24
40
49
47
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
29
17 15 13
26
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Expressed and Measured Interest (N = 140,552)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
73
52 48 45
9
14
10 16
18
34
43 39
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
23
16 15 15
32
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
16 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
17. Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
* Race/ethnicity categories changed for the 2010–2011 academic year to reflect updated US Department of Education reporting requirements.
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
38
47
29
24
59
19
12
40
50
36
28
70
22
14
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 56,109 N = 3,366 N = 20,475 N = 61,649 N = 1,254 N = 216,388 N = 16,422
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
51
38
47
34
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 112,671 N = 278,597
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
45
52
38
29
64
23
17
46
54
48
34
74
25
20
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 14,166 N = 1,310 N = 8,775 N = 21,922 N = 397 N = 82,362 N = 5,991
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
59
43
56
40
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 39,322 N = 100,720
Medical and Health
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
17
18. Medical and Health
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
9
8
25
49
50
9
7
27
54
55
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 157,050 N = 50,777 N = 146,753 N = 14,606 N = 2,466
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
18
29
31
47
58
65
21
31
33
51
63
70
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 24,000 N = 47,335 N = 94,784 N = 43,834 N = 64,555 N = 81,916
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
13
10
27
51
56
13
9
29
55
60
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 74,105 N = 16,352 N = 43,163 N = 3,806 N = 462
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
24
35
37
53
64
71
26
37
39
56
68
75
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 10,278 N = 18,914 N = 37,063 N = 16,736 N = 24,045 N = 28,123
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
18 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
19. * The “overall STEM interest” counts and percents do not include the “measured only interest” students, as they did not choose a STEM major
or occupation.
Medical and Health
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
Medical and Health Majors/Occupations
National N Counts and Percents
Overall STEM Interest*
Expressed and
Measured Only
N Count Percent N Count Percent
Athletic Training 26,215 8 6,968 5
Chiropractic (Pre-Chiropractic) 2,030 1 744 1
Dentistry (Pre-Dentistry) 12,640 4 4,758 3
Emergency Medical Technology 4,222 1 1,680 1
Food and Nutrition 3,423 1 626 0
Health/Medical Technology, General 12,435 4 5,431 4
Medical Laboratory Technology 2,434 1 1,309 1
Medical Radiologic Technology 9,092 3 3,498 2
Medicine (Pre-Medicine) 71,401 21 40,088 29
Nuclear Medicine Technology 631 0 292 0
Nursing, Practical/Vocational (LPN) 13,277 4 4,188 3
Nursing, Registered (BS/RN) 87,883 26 33,960 24
Optometry (Pre-Optometry) 2,553 1 1,171 1
Osteopathic Medicine 586 0 310 0
Pharmacy (Pre-Pharmacy) 18,689 6 8,564 6
Physical Therapy (Pre-Physical Therapy) 32,942 10 10,700 8
Physician Assisting 7,973 2 3,784 3
Respiratory Therapy Technology 614 0 227 0
Surgical Technology 4,648 1 2,537 2
Veterinarian Assisting/Technology 4,669 1 1,654 1
Veterinary Medicine (Pre-Vet) 15,842 5 8,063 6
Totals 334,199 140,552
19
20. Engineering and Technology
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
• Between 2011 and
2015, the percent
of students
interested in STEM
increased by 2%.
Student STEM Interest Trends: 2011–2015
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Percent Nation 23% 23% 24% 25% 25%
N Count Nation 180,295 184,644 207,344 220,815 236,300
Overall STEM Interest (N = 236,300)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
67
50
57
50
8
11
7
12
25
38 36 38
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
27
11 11 12
38
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Expressed and Measured Interest (N = 71,909)
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by ACT College Readiness Benchmark Attainment
and Subject
79
65
72
66
6
10
6
11
14
25 22 23
0
20
40
60
80
100
English Reading Mathematics Science
Percent
Below Benchmark
by 3+ Points
Within 2 Points
of Benchmark
Met Benchmark
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
by Number of ACT College Readiness Benchmarks
Attained
15
9 10
13
54
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4
Percent
Benchmarks Met
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
20 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
21. Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
* Race/ethnicity categories changed for the 2010–2011 academic year to reflect updated US Department of Education reporting requirements.
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
52
61
33
33
64
23
16
58
67
40
43
77
29
21
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 26,610 N = 1,943 N = 13,661 N = 38,291 N = 793 N = 132,315 N = 9,107
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
56
62
49
54
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 191,297 N = 43,762
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
67
74
53
47
74
32
28
71
79
57
57
84
38
33
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
Mathematics
Science
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 5,198 N = 571 N = 4,656 N = 11,116 N = 182 N = 43,250 N = 3,040
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Gender and Subject
70
79
65
71
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Mathematics
Science
Male Female
N = 59,011 N = 12,630
Engineering and Technology
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
21
22. Engineering and Technology
Majors/Occupations
Overall STEM Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
10
10
44
72
66
10
10
51
80
74
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 35,822 N = 49,217 N = 113,310 N = 11,609 N = 7,061
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
24
38
40
60
72
74
30
44
46
68
79
80
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 14,821 N = 34,216 N = 60,986 N = 21,468 N = 31,498 N = 43,982
Expressed and Measured Interest
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Educational Aspirations and Subject
14
15
57
80
76
14
15
64
86
82
Voc-tech
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Voc-tech
Degree
N = 16,429 N = 19,137 N = 31,603 N = 1,755 N = 1,056
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Highest Parental Education Level and Subject
38
53
56
73
81
83
45
59
60
79
87
88
High School
Graduate or Less
Certification or
Some College
Associate’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Professional
Degree
Mathematics
Science
Professional
Degree
Master’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Associate’s
Degree
Certification
or Some
College
High School
Grad or
Less
N = 6,406 N = 13,699 N = 21,609 N = 6,442 N = 9,065 N = 11,197
Note: Reporting achievement by combinations of student characteristics may give rise to small N counts. As a result, outcomes reported in this section
should be interpreted with caution.
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
22 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
23. * The “overall STEM interest” counts and percents do not include the “measured only interest” students, as they did not choose a STEM major
or occupation.
Engineering and Technology
Majors/Occupations
NATIONAL STEM REPORT
Engineering and Technology
Majors/Occupations
National N Counts and Percents
Overall STEM Interest*
Expressed and
Measured Only
N Count Percent N Count Percent
Aeronautical/Aerospace Engineering Technology 1,792 1 749 1
Aerospace/Aeronautical Engineering 15,134 7 7,268 10
Agricultural/Bioengineering 1,643 1 592 1
Architectural Drafting/CAD Technology 1,292 1 263 0
Architectural Engineering 5,476 3 1,315 2
Architectural Engineering Technology 940 0 222 0
Architecture, General 10,280 5 1,845 3
Automotive Engineering Technology 4,009 2 778 1
Biomedical Engineering 11,791 6 6,926 10
Chemical Engineering 14,424 7 7,695 11
Civil Engineering 13,356 6 3,549 5
Civil Engineering Technology 1,015 0 292 0
Computer Engineering 14,733 7 4,606 6
Computer Engineering Technology 5,391 3 1,404 2
Construction Engineering/Management 4,216 2 751 1
Construction/Building Technology 1,008 0 180 0
Drafting/CAD Technology, General 1,249 1 320 0
Electrical, Electronic, and Communication Engineering 12,621 6 4,109 6
Electrical/Electronics Engineering Technology 3,230 2 851 1
Electromechanical/Biomedical Engineering Technology 466 0 245 0
Engineering (Pre-Engineering), General 25,268 12 8,816 12
Engineering Technology, General 4,803 2 1,350 2
Environmental Control Technologies 204 0 86 0
Environmental Health Engineering 2,337 1 1,071 1
Industrial Engineering 3,199 2 781 1
Industrial Production Technologies 523 0 129 0
Mechanical Drafting/CAD Technology 1,336 1 354 0
Mechanical Engineering 39,407 19 12,371 17
Mechanical Engineering Technology 3,358 2 918 1
Military Technologies 2,858 1 688 1
Nuclear Engineering 2,636 1 1,340 2
Quality Control and Safety Technologies 92 0 15 0
Surveying Technology 98 0 30 0
Totals 210,185 71,909
23
24. Overall STEM Interest
• 939,049 graduates have an interest in STEM.
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Subject
49
45
26
0
20
40
60
80
100
Mathematics Science STEM
Percent
Expressed and Measured Interest
• 320,030 graduates have an expressed and measured
interest in STEM, which is 34% of the overall interest.
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting ACT College Readiness Benchmarks by
Subject
58
54
33
0
20
40
60
80
100
Mathematics Science STEM
Percent
Student Readiness for STEM College Coursework
National ACT STEM Benchmarks
ACT added a new STEM score to ACT student score
reports in fall 2015. Our goal was to provide students
and educators with greater insight into critical
aspects of college readiness. This score, derived from
the ACT mathematics and science scores, represents
students’ overall performance in these two subject
areas. Recent research indicated that academic
readiness for college coursework in STEM subject
areas may require higher scores than the current
ACT College Readiness Benchmarks in math and
science.3
The findings of this research sparked the
development of the ACT STEM Benchmark score.
The ACT STEM College Readiness Benchmark was
developed using the same methodology as the single
subject area ACT College Readiness Benchmark.
Typical grades in first-year college STEM courses
(Calculus, General Biology, General Chemistry, and
Physics) were combined in a single course success
model to determine the ACT STEM test score that
was associated with at least a 50% chance of
earning a B or higher or a 75% chance of earning
a C or higher in those courses. The resulting
ACT STEM College Readiness Benchmark score
was 26. Based on that Benchmark, only 20% of the
2015 ACT-tested high school graduating class was
ready for first-year STEM college courses.
ACT STEM Benchmark scores are related not only to
succeeding in individual math and science courses,
but also to achieving longer-term outcomes. Mattern
et al. (2015) showed that students with STEM majors
who met the ACT STEM Benchmark were more likely
to earn a cumulative grade point average of 3.0 or
higher, persist in a STEM major, and earn a
STEM‑related bachelor’s degree than those who
failed to meet the Benchmark. Additionally, ongoing
research suggests that providing STEM readiness
information to prospective students may help
facilitate the transition to college by aligning
students’ expectations with course demands.
24 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
25. Overall STEM Interest
25
32
17
13
49
8
5
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 113,142 N = 7,597 N = 54,062 N = 145,667 N = 2,905 N = 528,084 N = 38,529
31
21
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Male Female
N = 464,177 N = 470,518
Expressed and Measured Interest
32
38
23
18
54
11
8
Two or
More Races
White
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Asian
American
Indian
African
American
African
American
American
Indian Asian Hispanic
Pacific
Islander White
Two or
More Races
N = 27,442 N = 2,537 N = 20,950 N = 48,324 N = 856 N = 191,201 N = 13,624
41
26
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male Female
Percent
Male Female
N = 152,203 N = 166,763
Student Readiness for STEM College Coursework
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting the ACT STEM Benchmark by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
* Race/ethnicity categories changed for the 2010–2011 academic year to reflect updated US Department of Education reporting requirements.
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting the ACT STEM Benchmark by Gender and
Subject
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting the ACT STEM Benchmark by
Race/Ethnicity and Subject*
Percent of 2015 ACT-Tested High School Graduates
Meeting the ACT STEM Benchmark by Gender and
Subject
National ACT STEM Benchmarks
25
28. ACT Research
As a nonprofit educational research organization, ACT is committed to producing research that focuses on key
issues in education and workforce development. Our goal is to serve as a data resource. We strive to provide
policymakers with the information they need to inform education and workforce development policy and to give
educators the tools they need to lead more students toward college and career success. What follows are some
recent and groundbreaking ACT research studies related to STEM. To review these studies, go to
www.act.org/research/summary.
improve yourself
ACT National Curriculum Survey®
2012
Policy Implications on Preparing for Higher Standards
ACT National Curriculum
Survey®
The ACT National Curriculum
Survey is a nationwide survey of
educational practices and
expectations. Conducted every
three to five years by ACT, the
survey collects data about what entering college
students should know and be able to do to be ready
for college-level coursework in English, math, reading,
and science. www.act.org/research-policy/national-
curriculum-survey
The Condition
of Future
Educators 2014
National
The Condition of Future
Educators 2014
Data from past ACT Condition of
STEM reports have shown there are
few students interested in math or
science education as a profession.
This report provides current
educators and policymakers a glimpse inside the
pipeline of future educators.
www.act.org/futureeducators
The Condition
of College &
Career
Readiness
2015
National
The Condition of College &
Career Readiness 2015
Using ACT scores and the ACT
College Readiness Benchmarks,
The Condition of College & Career
Readiness 2015 provides data
highlighting the college and career
readiness of the ACT-tested high school class of 2015.
This report is updated annually.
www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr15
Broadening the Definition of
College and Career Readiness:
A Holistic Approach
By Krista Mattern, Jeremy Burrus, Wayne Camara,
Ryan O’Connor, Mary Ann Hansen, James Gambrell,
Alex Casillas, Becky Bobek
ACT Research Report Series 2014 (5)
Broadening the Definition of
College and Career Readiness:
A Holistic Approach
The Condition of College & Career
Readiness 2015 report revealed
that only 28% of 2015 ACT-tested
high school graduates met all four
ACT College Readiness Benchmarks. A more holistic
approach to college and career readiness is in order.
This report provides evidence that educators,
policymakers, and employers embrace a wide variety of
skills critical for success. The research also shows that
we can improve prediction of college and career
readiness by measuring a broader range of skills.
www.act.org/research/researchers/reports/pdf/
ACT_RR2014-5.pdf
Understanding
the Underserved
Learner
The Condition of
STEM 2014
Understanding the Underserved
Learner—The Condition of
STEM 2014
In developing Understanding the
Underserved Learner—The
Condition of STEM 2014, ACT’s
goal was to further advance STEM
readiness and to honor its commitments to engaging
underserved learners in pursuit of their college and
career goals. Identifying these students and
determining their readiness in math and science could
provide them with more opportunities to successfully
enter STEM careers and help address the national
deficit of skilled STEM workers.
www.act.org/stemcondition/14/pdf/STEM-
Underserved-Learner.pdf
28 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
29. STEM Resources
ACT has connected with state STEM councils across the country to identify valuable STEM-related
resources. These are the top resources suggested by STEM experts.
STEM Premier®
STEM Premier is a virtual platform that connects
STEM students with higher education and the
workforce. Students can showcase their skills, get
ranked and rated, receive guidance, and find STEM
scholarships while colleges, technical schools, and
corporations can identify, track, and recruit
STEM Premier talent.
www.stempremier.com
STEMconnector®
STEMconnector is the “one-stop
shop” for STEM information. With
several products and services,
STEMconnector supports its
members in the design, implementation, and
measurement of their STEM strategies. Since its
launch in 2011, STEMconnector has been the leader
in leveraging a network of STEM stakeholders to
“make things happen.” STEMconnector’s charge is to
identify, inform, and connect entities working in
STEM education and careers to assess smart STEM
investments and results.
www.stemconnector.org
USA Science and
Engineering Festival
The USA Science and
Engineering Festival attracts
thousands of K–12 students,
parents, teachers, and STEM professionals in the
largest national celebration of STEM. The fourth
annual conference will be held April 15–17, 2016,
in Washington, DC.
www.usasciencefestival.org
National Science Teachers Association
The National Science Teachers Association, founded
in 1944 and headquartered in Arlington, Va., is the
largest organization in the world committed to
promoting excellence and innovation in science
teaching and learning for all. NSTA’s current
membership of 55,000 includes science teachers,
science supervisors, administrators, scientists,
business and industry representatives, and others
involved in and committed to science education.
www.nsta.org
Learning Blade®
From the creators of ACT KeyTrain®
, Learning Blade
is an online system that fosters interest in STEM
careers among middle and early high school
students. The system includes game-based
“missions” that educate students on STEM careers
and technologies in a system validated by BattelleEd,
providing teachers with STEM instruction and
analytics to improve academic performance.
www.learningblade.com
USNews.com
The US News STEM Solutions National Leadership
Conference is focused on improving America’s
science, technology, engineering, and math
workforce. As a digital media company committed to
covering STEM through in-depth reporting, research,
and analysis, US News & World Report will bring the
fifth annual leadership conference to the Hilton
Baltimore on May 18–20, 2016.
www.usnews.com/news/stem-solutions
29
30. ACT-Defined STEM Majors and Occupations by Area
Science Majors/Occupations
Agronomy and Crop Science
Animal Sciences
Astronomy
Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology
Biochemistry and Biophysics
Biology, General
Cell/Cellular Biology
Chemistry
Ecology
Environmental Science
Food Sciences and Technology
Forestry
Genetics
Geological and Earth Sciences
Horticulture Science
Marine/Aquatic Biology
Microbiology and Immunology
Natural Resources Conservation, General
Natural Resources Management
Physical Sciences, General
Physics
Science Education
Wildlife and Wildlands Management
Zoology
Computer Science and Mathematics
Majors/Occupations
Actuarial Science
Applied Mathematics
Business/Management Quantitative Methods, General
Computer and Information Sciences, General
Computer Network/Telecommunications
Computer Science and Programming
Computer Software and Media Application
Computer System Administration
Data Management Technology
Information Science
Management Information Systems
Mathematics Education
Mathematics, General
Statistics
Webpage Design
Medical and Health Majors/Occupations
Athletic Training
Chiropractic (Pre-Chiropractic)
Dentistry (Pre-Dentistry)
Emergency Medical Technology
Food and Nutrition
Health/Medical Technology, General
Medical Laboratory Technology
Medical Radiologic Technology
Medicine (Pre-Medicine)
Nuclear Medicine Technology
Nursing, Practical/Vocational (LPN)
Nursing, Registered (BS/RN)
Optometry (Pre-Optometry)
Osteopathic Medicine
Pharmacy (Pre-Pharmacy)
Physical Therapy (Pre-Physical Therapy)
Physician Assisting
Respiratory Therapy Technology
Surgical Technology
Veterinarian Assisting/Technology
Veterinary Medicine (Pre-Vet)
Engineering and Technology Majors/Occupations
Aeronautical/Aerospace Engineering Technology
Aerospace/Aeronautical Engineering
Agricultural/Bioengineering
Architectural Drafting/CAD Technology
Architectural Engineering
Architectural Engineering Technology
Architecture, General
Automotive Engineering Technology
Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Civil Engineering Technology
Computer Engineering
Computer Engineering Technology
Construction Engineering/Management
Construction/Building Technology
Drafting/CAD Technology, General
Electrical, Electronic, and Communication Engineering
Electrical/Electronics Engineering Technology
Electromechanical/Biomedical Engineering Technology
Engineering (Pre-Engineering), General
Engineering Technology, General
Environmental Control Technologies
Environmental Health Engineering
Industrial Engineering
Industrial Production Technologies
Mechanical Drafting/CAD Technology
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Military Technologies
Nuclear Engineering
Quality Control and Safety Technologies
Surveying Technology
30 THE CONDITION OF STEM 2015
31. National STEM Report
Notes
1. When individuals register for the ACT, they are asked to choose a college major they plan to enter as well as
an occupational choice from a list of 294 major and occupational titles. Of these 294 titles, 93 have been
identified as STEM related. Assignment of ACT titles to STEM titles was conducted by an expert panel of
ACT staff members with knowledge of labor market trends and postsecondary academic programs.
Panel decisions were informed by three sources of information: (1) STEM-designated occupations from the
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), (2) STEM-designated degree programs from US Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE), and (3) ACT Interest Inventory score profiles for students planning to enter the
major/occupation. ACT titles were assigned to STEM when both the corresponding BLS and ICE titles were
included in STEM or when the corresponding BLS title was included in STEM and the profile of measured
interests of students planning to enter this occupation peaked on the Science and Technology scale. These
two guidelines accounted for 89 of the 93 ACT titles assigned to STEM. The remaining four titles were
assigned to STEM based on the judged intensiveness of their math and science coursework (major) or work
tasks (occupation). ACT titles in the Social Sciences were excluded from this STEM list because many STEM
taxonomies do not include majors and occupations in this field.
2. Students were assigned to one of three STEM cohorts: Expressed and Measured, Expressed Only, or
Measured Only. These cohorts were based on the pairing of Expressed and Measured STEM interest types,
where:
• Students with expressed STEM interest planned on a STEM major or occupation following high school.
• Students with measured STEM interest had a highest ACT Interest Inventory score in Science or had a
highest ACT Interest Inventory score in Technology and a second-highest score in Science.
Within each STEM cohort, students were also assigned to one of four STEM areas: Science, Computer
Science and Mathematics, Medical and Health, or Engineering and Technology. STEM areas for students in
the Expressed and Measured Interest cohort and the Expressed Interest Only cohort were based on the
STEM area of students’ planned major. If planned major was not STEM, then the STEM area of their planned
occupation was used. For students in the Measured Interest Only cohort, STEM area was based on a
crosswalk between ACT Interest Inventory score profile and planned major. The crosswalk was created from a
national sample of undergraduate students with a declared major and a grade point average of at least 2.0.
(For more information about the crosswalk, go to www.act.org/emtrends/12/interestmajor.html.)
3. Mattern, K., Radunzel, J., & Westrick P. (2015). Development of STEM readiness benchmarks to assist career
and educational decision making. (ACT Research Report 2015-3). Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.
31
32. ACT is an independent, nonprofit organization that provides assessment,
research, information, and program management services in the broad
areas of education and workforce development. Each year, we serve
millions of people in high schools, colleges, professional associations,
businesses, and government agencies, nationally and internationally.
Though designed to meet a wide array of needs, all ACT programs and
services have one guiding purpose—helping people achieve education
and workplace success.
This report can be found at
www.act.org/stemcondition
*070804160* Rev 1