This document discusses spin, public relations, and issues management. It defines these terms and outlines the differences between crises and issues. Issues are long-lasting, involve factual and moral disagreements, and can affect a company's license to operate. Issues management is an anticipatory strategic process to detect emerging trends and respond appropriately. Examples discussed include the REACH chemical regulation and Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). REACH involved intense lobbying over many years. ACTA faced grassroots opposition through petitions, protests, and social media that ultimately led the European Parliament to reject the agreement.
Climate change, access to education, income inequality, socially responsible investing, resource scarcity, diversity & inclusion, sustainable development goals, reporting standards. These are just a few of the critical challenges society and business will face in the next decade. These challenges are creating trends that are changing the context where organizations operate. Are you ready? In this workshop participants will:
be invited to reflect about how these trends will impact their organizations;
identify and prioritize trends for a given sector; and
develop recommendations for organizations in specific sectors.
Speakers:
Moderator: Nelmara Arbex, Teaching Fellow, Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship
Stephen Hale, director of Green Alliance presents at a NCVO Third Sector Foresight seminar exploring the implications of climate change for the voluntary and community sector
Presentation to a European conference on injury prevention. Addresses how advocates can make change happen and why good evidence alone is often not enough to achieve policy change.
The UCSF Center for Tobacco Control, Research and Education hosted it's Annual Tobacco Documents Workshop on May 8, 2015. At the Workshop, public health advocates and scholars from across the United States learned the history of the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (LTDL), as well as how to search the LTDL to further the cause of tobacco control and promote public health in their own communities.
Climate change, access to education, income inequality, socially responsible investing, resource scarcity, diversity & inclusion, sustainable development goals, reporting standards. These are just a few of the critical challenges society and business will face in the next decade. These challenges are creating trends that are changing the context where organizations operate. Are you ready? In this workshop participants will:
be invited to reflect about how these trends will impact their organizations;
identify and prioritize trends for a given sector; and
develop recommendations for organizations in specific sectors.
Speakers:
Moderator: Nelmara Arbex, Teaching Fellow, Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship
Stephen Hale, director of Green Alliance presents at a NCVO Third Sector Foresight seminar exploring the implications of climate change for the voluntary and community sector
Presentation to a European conference on injury prevention. Addresses how advocates can make change happen and why good evidence alone is often not enough to achieve policy change.
The UCSF Center for Tobacco Control, Research and Education hosted it's Annual Tobacco Documents Workshop on May 8, 2015. At the Workshop, public health advocates and scholars from across the United States learned the history of the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (LTDL), as well as how to search the LTDL to further the cause of tobacco control and promote public health in their own communities.
Regulating risk in the eu science, policy and precaution q&aeuinmotion
http://www.eu-academy.eu/freeresources/regulating-risk-in-the-eu-science-policy-and-precaution/
The rapid growth of EU regulations dealing with Pharma, Food, Chemicals and beyond
Advocacy opportunities in risk regulation
The nature, politics and the law of the Precautionary Principle
WEBSITE:
Zeus Dorado
Aika Manliclic
Rina Tanjangco
WRITERS:
(EXTERNAL ISSUES)
MATHEW ONG: War on Terrorism
CARMELA DEANG: Iraq-Palestinian
LEONARD DE LEON: Global Poverty
VERONICA LOPEZ: UN, Millenium Development Goals
JERRY RIMANDO: Technology Gap between Rich and Poor (Digital Divide)
(INTERNAL ISSUES)
MARK LIM: Environmental Problem
GABRIEL MAGNO: American Market, Culture
ALAN JARANTILLA: Social Welfare: Health and Education
PAOLO LAYUG: Economic Recession on Car Industry and Financing Industry
RON RIVERA: Public Debt
NICCOLE ALVENDIA: US Politics
POSTERS:
Mae Alabanza (Poster Leader)
Ara Dacay
Ruth Sy
Charmy Oliveros
Derick Espinosa
MAGAZINE:
Joanna Tapar (Magazine Leader)
Cheska Abacan
Jacqueline Ang
Joseph Daez
Gian Lucas
POWERPOINT:
Leslie Filart (Powerpoint Leader)
Aina Abesamis
Kit de Vera
Lia Fernandez
Ji Hiyoen Lee
Ram Ng
AGES TV - Dr. Ragnar E Löfstedt, Professor für Risikomanagment und Direktor des King's Centre for Risk Management am King's College London: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01rZCvb_gGQ&list=UUaDErMBvGGb1FZoLmdRenbQ&index=1&feature=plcp
Fachsymposium "Verbraucherschutz, Öffentliche Gesundheit & Arzneimittelsicherheit im Spannungsfeld Risiko, Krise und Panikmache", 21.11.2011 (AGES, Wien)
Finanz, EHEC, Fukushima - Wahrnehmung und Umgang mit einer Krise sind so unterschiedlich und individuell, wie die Menschen selbst. Doch wie empfinden wir VerbraucherInnen Risiko und was sagt die Wissenschaft dazu? Wann beginnt aus einer potentiellen Gefahr eine tatsächliche Krise zu werden? Und wann wird eine Krise zur medialen Panikmache? Rund 100 VertreterInnen aus Politik und Wirtschaft, Behörden und Medien diskutierten den Umgang mit gefühlten und tatsächlichen Risiken und dem Management im Krisenfall. Die Themen reichten von Dioxin über EHEC bis Fukushima, von BSE über Acrylamid bis zur Vogelgrippe.
Neben Gesundheitsminister Alois Stöger standen mit Risikoforscher Prof. Dr. Ragnar Löfstedt (Direktor des King's Centre for Risk Management am King‘s College, London) und Prof. DDr. Andreas Hensel (Präsident des deutschen Bundesinstituts für Risikobewertung, BfR) zwei internationale Experten aus dem Bereich Risikoforschung und Risikomanagment für einen Dialog bereit. Priv.-Doz. Dr. Pamela Rendi-Wagner (Generaldirektorin für Öffentliche Gesundheit im Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, BMG) und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Marcus Müllner (Bereichsleiter der Arzneimittelagentur AGES PharmMed) erläuterten die Risikokommunikation in der öffentlichen Gesundheit anhand der Beispiele Fukushima bzw. Risiken und Nutzen von Arzneimitteln. Die PR-Expertinnen Sabrina Oswald und Martina Tuma beleuchteten die Anforderungen der Risikokommunikation von Wirtschaftsunternehmen in Zeiten des „Web 2.0“.
Gemäß dem Spruch "Nach der Krise ist vor der Krise" sehen die ExpertInnen vor allem Bedarf an organisatorischer Vorbereitung (Krisenhandbuch, Ansprechpartnern, etc), inhaltlicher Aufbereitung der eigenen Krisen-PR-Themen sowie professionellem Management im akuten Krisenfall. Investiert werden sollte „in Friedenszeiten“ in den Aufbau von Vertrauen unter Einbindung von Meinungsbildnern sowie in Bereitstellung transparenter Informationen unter Verwendung unabhängiger wissenschaftlicher Expertise. Denn eine jede Krise ist über die wirtschaftlichen Folgen des betroffenen Produzenten hinaus immer mit enormen volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten verbunden. Schlussendlich gebe es nur eine Antwort für eine Öffentlichkeit, die regelmäßig und latent mit Angst machenden Krisen konfrontiert wird: schnelle, adäquate und transparente Information.
Details zu Programm, Inhalten und Vortragenden: http://www.ages.at/ages/ages-akademie/stakeholderveranstaltungen/wien-risikokommunikation/
Stefano Pagliano: "A Global Financial Governance?"Global Utmaning
A presentation held by PhD Stefano Pagliari, Departement of International Politics, City University London, at the high level seminar "Towards a sustainable financial system", hosted by the Stockholm based think tank Global Challenge in cooperation with London School of Economics and Swedish House of Finance on September 12th 2013.
Where there is no vision the people perishJohn Middleton
A presentation of the work of the Faculty of public Health and the place of rights, values, ethics and law in improving the health of the public. 181102 middletonj scottish conference final
Presentation of and discussion guide for James Hoggan and Richard Littlemore's book "Do the Right Thing: PR Tips for a Skeptical Public," used in PR Research & Strategies class at Florida A&M University.
Regulating risk in the eu science, policy and precaution q&aeuinmotion
http://www.eu-academy.eu/freeresources/regulating-risk-in-the-eu-science-policy-and-precaution/
The rapid growth of EU regulations dealing with Pharma, Food, Chemicals and beyond
Advocacy opportunities in risk regulation
The nature, politics and the law of the Precautionary Principle
WEBSITE:
Zeus Dorado
Aika Manliclic
Rina Tanjangco
WRITERS:
(EXTERNAL ISSUES)
MATHEW ONG: War on Terrorism
CARMELA DEANG: Iraq-Palestinian
LEONARD DE LEON: Global Poverty
VERONICA LOPEZ: UN, Millenium Development Goals
JERRY RIMANDO: Technology Gap between Rich and Poor (Digital Divide)
(INTERNAL ISSUES)
MARK LIM: Environmental Problem
GABRIEL MAGNO: American Market, Culture
ALAN JARANTILLA: Social Welfare: Health and Education
PAOLO LAYUG: Economic Recession on Car Industry and Financing Industry
RON RIVERA: Public Debt
NICCOLE ALVENDIA: US Politics
POSTERS:
Mae Alabanza (Poster Leader)
Ara Dacay
Ruth Sy
Charmy Oliveros
Derick Espinosa
MAGAZINE:
Joanna Tapar (Magazine Leader)
Cheska Abacan
Jacqueline Ang
Joseph Daez
Gian Lucas
POWERPOINT:
Leslie Filart (Powerpoint Leader)
Aina Abesamis
Kit de Vera
Lia Fernandez
Ji Hiyoen Lee
Ram Ng
AGES TV - Dr. Ragnar E Löfstedt, Professor für Risikomanagment und Direktor des King's Centre for Risk Management am King's College London: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01rZCvb_gGQ&list=UUaDErMBvGGb1FZoLmdRenbQ&index=1&feature=plcp
Fachsymposium "Verbraucherschutz, Öffentliche Gesundheit & Arzneimittelsicherheit im Spannungsfeld Risiko, Krise und Panikmache", 21.11.2011 (AGES, Wien)
Finanz, EHEC, Fukushima - Wahrnehmung und Umgang mit einer Krise sind so unterschiedlich und individuell, wie die Menschen selbst. Doch wie empfinden wir VerbraucherInnen Risiko und was sagt die Wissenschaft dazu? Wann beginnt aus einer potentiellen Gefahr eine tatsächliche Krise zu werden? Und wann wird eine Krise zur medialen Panikmache? Rund 100 VertreterInnen aus Politik und Wirtschaft, Behörden und Medien diskutierten den Umgang mit gefühlten und tatsächlichen Risiken und dem Management im Krisenfall. Die Themen reichten von Dioxin über EHEC bis Fukushima, von BSE über Acrylamid bis zur Vogelgrippe.
Neben Gesundheitsminister Alois Stöger standen mit Risikoforscher Prof. Dr. Ragnar Löfstedt (Direktor des King's Centre for Risk Management am King‘s College, London) und Prof. DDr. Andreas Hensel (Präsident des deutschen Bundesinstituts für Risikobewertung, BfR) zwei internationale Experten aus dem Bereich Risikoforschung und Risikomanagment für einen Dialog bereit. Priv.-Doz. Dr. Pamela Rendi-Wagner (Generaldirektorin für Öffentliche Gesundheit im Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, BMG) und Univ.-Prof. Dr. Marcus Müllner (Bereichsleiter der Arzneimittelagentur AGES PharmMed) erläuterten die Risikokommunikation in der öffentlichen Gesundheit anhand der Beispiele Fukushima bzw. Risiken und Nutzen von Arzneimitteln. Die PR-Expertinnen Sabrina Oswald und Martina Tuma beleuchteten die Anforderungen der Risikokommunikation von Wirtschaftsunternehmen in Zeiten des „Web 2.0“.
Gemäß dem Spruch "Nach der Krise ist vor der Krise" sehen die ExpertInnen vor allem Bedarf an organisatorischer Vorbereitung (Krisenhandbuch, Ansprechpartnern, etc), inhaltlicher Aufbereitung der eigenen Krisen-PR-Themen sowie professionellem Management im akuten Krisenfall. Investiert werden sollte „in Friedenszeiten“ in den Aufbau von Vertrauen unter Einbindung von Meinungsbildnern sowie in Bereitstellung transparenter Informationen unter Verwendung unabhängiger wissenschaftlicher Expertise. Denn eine jede Krise ist über die wirtschaftlichen Folgen des betroffenen Produzenten hinaus immer mit enormen volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten verbunden. Schlussendlich gebe es nur eine Antwort für eine Öffentlichkeit, die regelmäßig und latent mit Angst machenden Krisen konfrontiert wird: schnelle, adäquate und transparente Information.
Details zu Programm, Inhalten und Vortragenden: http://www.ages.at/ages/ages-akademie/stakeholderveranstaltungen/wien-risikokommunikation/
Stefano Pagliano: "A Global Financial Governance?"Global Utmaning
A presentation held by PhD Stefano Pagliari, Departement of International Politics, City University London, at the high level seminar "Towards a sustainable financial system", hosted by the Stockholm based think tank Global Challenge in cooperation with London School of Economics and Swedish House of Finance on September 12th 2013.
Where there is no vision the people perishJohn Middleton
A presentation of the work of the Faculty of public Health and the place of rights, values, ethics and law in improving the health of the public. 181102 middletonj scottish conference final
Presentation of and discussion guide for James Hoggan and Richard Littlemore's book "Do the Right Thing: PR Tips for a Skeptical Public," used in PR Research & Strategies class at Florida A&M University.
1. Spin, PR and Issues Management
29 October 2015
Sara Magdalena Goldberger
Executive Communications Lead Group Operations and Technology
2. Agenda
A definition
Difference between crisis and issues
From crisis to issue
How an issue might develop – Child Obesity
Issues – 3 likely scenarios
What is issues management?
License to operate
Examples – REACH and ACTA
REACH and Chemical Industry
REACH and Chemical Industry
Messaging examples
ACTA and grass roots
ACTA cont’d
ACTA cont’d
2
3. Spin
Public Relations
Issues Management
Providing a biased interpretation of an
event or campaigning to persuade
Managing the spread of information
between an individual or an organization
and the public
an anticipatory, strategic management
process that helps organizations detect and
respond appropriately to emerging trends
or changes in the socio-political
environment
A definition
3
4. Crisis
Immediate
Short lived
Human mistakes
Facts are clear
Rarely any moral disagreements
Cleaning up the mess
(Under)informed public
Societal vacuum
Issues
Long lasting
Lengthy and disputed decisions
Factual Disagreement
Moral disputes
Coalition building
Public is well-informed
Institutional matrix
Based on commercial market decisions
Difference between crisis and issues
5. From crisis to issue
Emergence Resolution Permanence
Pressure
6. Emergence Resolution Permanence
How an issue might develop – Child Obesity
6
A notion that children are
getting obese
Sports on school curriculum Health issues: present and future
Regulation is being discussed Research – Industry action Social behaviour
Piecemeal industry solution
rather than addressing the issue
Healthier product ranges Growing middle class can afford
healthier choices
Choice Legislation Less choice
7. 1. A trigger event will bring about a “dormant crisis” – this can be
managed and dealt with and remain dormant
2. The issue completely changes the playing field and affects
corporate license to operate
3. Crisis – flare up and go away but does not affect the corporate
license to operate
Issues – 3 likely scenarios
7
10. Corporate
REACH and Dow Chemical
REACH – Registration, Authorisation and
Restriction of Chemicals
Grass-root
How grass-roots stopped legislation
Anti-Counter fitting Trade Agreement -
ACTA
Examples – REACH and ACTA
11. 2001 – White paper
from the EC
April ´01 – Council
of Ministers accepts
White Paper
May ’03 –
Commission
presented draft
legislation & Public
consultation
REACH and Chemical Industry
11
Intense lobbying in Brussels and Member States: dinners, events, workshops
12. ’03 – ’05 EP
negotiations
and intense
lobbying
’05 – co-
decision process
’06 –
Negotiations EP
and Council
REACH accepted
’07 REACH
implemented
REACH and Chemical Industry
2003
June - NGOs deliver 22000 signatures
supporting REACH
Sept. - Joint letter from Tony Blair, Jacques
Chirac & Gerard Schröder anti-REACH
Dow CEO & President visit Greece to influence
new commissioner and before Greece’s chair
’03 - New Commissioner:
Mr. Dimas
Secretary of State
Powell sent 3 telegrams
with instructions to US
embassies to take
direct action
Intense lobbying in Brussels and Member States: dinners, events, workshops
14. 2006
Introduction of ACTA,
US insist NOT to
involve international
organisations
2007
Portugal’s Prime Minister
Economic Adviser tells the
US that his government
supported the
Commission’s leadership
on ACTA
2008
Wikileaks gave ACTA
public attention
2009
White House claims the
ACTA secrecy is a matter
of “national security”
ACTA and grass roots
15. 2011
protests are picking up
2012
2,4 million signatures
anti-ACTA,
EP committees start
voting against ACTA
July 4 2012
The EP turned down
ACTA
478 No to 39 Yes with
165 abstentions.
ACTA cont’d
16. 25 February, 2012 –anti-ACTA day
– 150 protest marches in 19 countries
– Second large protest 9 June 2012
41 activist organisations co-operated –
creating a broad coalition with protestes
coming from different angles
National and international petitions
– National German parliament e-petition
collected 61.000 names in 1 month
Financing through crowd sourcing
Tools
– Alternative legislative proposals
– Petitions – national and EU wide
– Newsletters
– Events
– Twitter
– Facebook
– Internet activist groups in Member States
ACTA cont’d
17. Thank you!
Sara Magdalena Goldberger
Executive Communications Lead Group Operations and Technology
zurich.com