A Methodolgy for Disentangling Public Funded R&D (GBARD) by IndustriesSPINTAN
A Methodolgy for Disentangling Public Funded R&D (GBARD) by Industries. Thessaloniki, SEM Conference. 2016. Matilde Mas, Eva Benages and Juan Fernández de Guevara
Sources of country-sector productivity growth: total factor productivity and ...SPINTAN
Sources of country-sector productivity growth: total factor productivity and intangible capital in the EU15 and the US. Society for Economic Measurement Annual Conference. July 2016. Thessaloniki
Modeling market and nonmarket Intangible investments in a macro-econometric f...SPINTAN
Modeling market and nonmarket Intangible investments in a macro-econometric framework. Sociedty for Economic Measurement Annual Conference. Thessaloniki July 2016
ICT, R&D and Non-R&D intangible capital: complementary relations and industry...SPINTAN
Paper presented in the Third World KLEMS Conference Tokyo, Japan, May 19-20, 2014. It provides descriptive evidence on the dynamics and intensity of intangible investments in a sample of European countries in 1995-2010. It also assesses the impact of intangible capital on European industry productivity growth focusing on the contribution of ICT, R&D and Non R&D Intangibles.
A Methodolgy for Disentangling Public Funded R&D (GBARD) by IndustriesSPINTAN
A Methodolgy for Disentangling Public Funded R&D (GBARD) by Industries. Thessaloniki, SEM Conference. 2016. Matilde Mas, Eva Benages and Juan Fernández de Guevara
Sources of country-sector productivity growth: total factor productivity and ...SPINTAN
Sources of country-sector productivity growth: total factor productivity and intangible capital in the EU15 and the US. Society for Economic Measurement Annual Conference. July 2016. Thessaloniki
Modeling market and nonmarket Intangible investments in a macro-econometric f...SPINTAN
Modeling market and nonmarket Intangible investments in a macro-econometric framework. Sociedty for Economic Measurement Annual Conference. Thessaloniki July 2016
ICT, R&D and Non-R&D intangible capital: complementary relations and industry...SPINTAN
Paper presented in the Third World KLEMS Conference Tokyo, Japan, May 19-20, 2014. It provides descriptive evidence on the dynamics and intensity of intangible investments in a sample of European countries in 1995-2010. It also assesses the impact of intangible capital on European industry productivity growth focusing on the contribution of ICT, R&D and Non R&D Intangibles.
Sweden - National System of Innovation SummaryTrevor Roald
This presentation summarizes the national system of innovation for Sweden. The presentation was prepared for the Simon Fraser University BUS 750 course. This course was part of the Management of Technology MBA program for 2015.
On 10 October, the OECD released R&D tax incentives indicators featured in the STI Scoreboard 2013. To learn more visit: www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats.htm.
To what extent does Finland’s regulatory landscape facilitate or discourage foreign investment? Which policy considerations can contribute to attracting new international investments to Finland and retaining existing ones? This presentation details the main findings in from an OECD report on The Impact of Regulation on International Investment in Finland. Find out more at https://www.oecd.org/investment/the-impact-of-regulation-on-international-investment-in-finland-b1bf8bee-en.htm
On 23 October 2013, the OECD launched the "Science, Technology and Industry (STI) Scoreboard: Innovation for Growth 2013" in Istanbul, Turkey at the OECD Global Forum on Knowledge Economy. The 260 indicators in the STI Scoreboard 2013 show how OECD and partner economies are performing in a wide range of areas to help governments design more effective and efficient policies and monitor progress towards their desired goals.
This paper investigates the evolution and determinants of manufactured exports and FDI in MED-11 countries over the period 1985-2009 as well as the prospects of their evolution under different scenarios pertaining to the evolution of the determinants. The econometric analysis confirmed the role of exchange rate depreciation, the openness of the economy and the quality of institution and infrastructure in fostering manufactured exports and FDI inflows in the Region. The prospects' assessment suggested that a scenario of deeper integration with the EU entails superior performance regarding manufactured exports and FDI than status quo or less integration with the EU but greater regional integration.
Authored by: Khalid Sekkat
Published in 2012
Conference on the knowledge base for research and innovation policy by Andrew...innovationoecd
On March 2, Andrew Wyckoff, Director for Science, Technology and Innovation at the OECD, presented the OECD’s analysis of what future research and innovation policy will look like. A number of foresight analyses conducted in a Norwegian and Nordic context were also presented.
CENTROPE is a multilateral project which develops a binding and lasting cooperation framework for the collaboration of regions and municipalities, business enterprises and societal institutions in the Central European Region. Thus it covers the regions Vienna, Lower Austria and Burgenland, South Moravia Region, Bratislava and Trnava Regions, Györ-Moson-Sopron as well as Vas County.
The CENTROPE Business and Labour Report is joint project of WIFO Vienna, wiiw Vienna, Institute for Economic Research of Slovak Academy of Sciences, IREAS – Institute for STructural Policy Prague, West Hungarian Research Institute Györ.
Building an Innovation-Driven Economy – The Case of BRIC and GCC CountriesMaxim Kotsemir
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2491488
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to undertake an analysis of the attempts of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) countries to catch up in their national development to build an innovation-driven economy on which to base future growth and wealth. We conducted an analysis of GCC and BRIC countries to show the different strategies leaders have taken to try and achieve this aspiration. This paper analyses the various aspects of national innovation systems of BRIC and GCC countries, highlights similar and different approaches and attempts to quantify their success. For example, GCC countries spend extensively on research and development (R&D), but have so far achieved less than meaningful results. Brazil, China and India are catching up to the acknowledged world leaders in innovation, but Russia is lagging.
Design/Methodology/Approach – Our comparison was based mostly on secondary data from sources and institutions that use statistical data to build country rankings, such as the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) produced by the World Economic Forum. BRIC and GCC countries were analyzed over 1996-2011 because most of the indicators data are only available from 1996. Data related to intellectual property rights have been collected since 1999 or 2000. The data available for the number of researchers proved problematic for both BRIC and GCC countries. For instance, some data for the GCC countries was missing. To not leave a gap, we extrapolated in line with the overall trend; using the least squares method to approximate a straight line for the missing data based on what had already been reported.
Findings – Counter-intuitively, we will argue that the push toward an innovation-based economy is actually not dependent on total expenditure on R&D, but rather relies on the efficient allocation of investments and the rigorous implementation of innovation strategy. And, we will demonstrate this by showing our ideas in relation to both BRIC and GCC countries. This analysis raises fascinating points of discussion for those looking to build an innovation economy in other countries and has practical implications for policy-makers and policy implementers in all countries.
Originality/Value – First analysis of the correlation of gross expenditure on R&D (GERD) with gross domestic product (GDP) growth and Straits Times Index (STI) policy measures.
Sweden - National System of Innovation SummaryTrevor Roald
This presentation summarizes the national system of innovation for Sweden. The presentation was prepared for the Simon Fraser University BUS 750 course. This course was part of the Management of Technology MBA program for 2015.
On 10 October, the OECD released R&D tax incentives indicators featured in the STI Scoreboard 2013. To learn more visit: www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats.htm.
To what extent does Finland’s regulatory landscape facilitate or discourage foreign investment? Which policy considerations can contribute to attracting new international investments to Finland and retaining existing ones? This presentation details the main findings in from an OECD report on The Impact of Regulation on International Investment in Finland. Find out more at https://www.oecd.org/investment/the-impact-of-regulation-on-international-investment-in-finland-b1bf8bee-en.htm
On 23 October 2013, the OECD launched the "Science, Technology and Industry (STI) Scoreboard: Innovation for Growth 2013" in Istanbul, Turkey at the OECD Global Forum on Knowledge Economy. The 260 indicators in the STI Scoreboard 2013 show how OECD and partner economies are performing in a wide range of areas to help governments design more effective and efficient policies and monitor progress towards their desired goals.
This paper investigates the evolution and determinants of manufactured exports and FDI in MED-11 countries over the period 1985-2009 as well as the prospects of their evolution under different scenarios pertaining to the evolution of the determinants. The econometric analysis confirmed the role of exchange rate depreciation, the openness of the economy and the quality of institution and infrastructure in fostering manufactured exports and FDI inflows in the Region. The prospects' assessment suggested that a scenario of deeper integration with the EU entails superior performance regarding manufactured exports and FDI than status quo or less integration with the EU but greater regional integration.
Authored by: Khalid Sekkat
Published in 2012
Conference on the knowledge base for research and innovation policy by Andrew...innovationoecd
On March 2, Andrew Wyckoff, Director for Science, Technology and Innovation at the OECD, presented the OECD’s analysis of what future research and innovation policy will look like. A number of foresight analyses conducted in a Norwegian and Nordic context were also presented.
CENTROPE is a multilateral project which develops a binding and lasting cooperation framework for the collaboration of regions and municipalities, business enterprises and societal institutions in the Central European Region. Thus it covers the regions Vienna, Lower Austria and Burgenland, South Moravia Region, Bratislava and Trnava Regions, Györ-Moson-Sopron as well as Vas County.
The CENTROPE Business and Labour Report is joint project of WIFO Vienna, wiiw Vienna, Institute for Economic Research of Slovak Academy of Sciences, IREAS – Institute for STructural Policy Prague, West Hungarian Research Institute Györ.
Building an Innovation-Driven Economy – The Case of BRIC and GCC CountriesMaxim Kotsemir
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2491488
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to undertake an analysis of the attempts of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) countries to catch up in their national development to build an innovation-driven economy on which to base future growth and wealth. We conducted an analysis of GCC and BRIC countries to show the different strategies leaders have taken to try and achieve this aspiration. This paper analyses the various aspects of national innovation systems of BRIC and GCC countries, highlights similar and different approaches and attempts to quantify their success. For example, GCC countries spend extensively on research and development (R&D), but have so far achieved less than meaningful results. Brazil, China and India are catching up to the acknowledged world leaders in innovation, but Russia is lagging.
Design/Methodology/Approach – Our comparison was based mostly on secondary data from sources and institutions that use statistical data to build country rankings, such as the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) produced by the World Economic Forum. BRIC and GCC countries were analyzed over 1996-2011 because most of the indicators data are only available from 1996. Data related to intellectual property rights have been collected since 1999 or 2000. The data available for the number of researchers proved problematic for both BRIC and GCC countries. For instance, some data for the GCC countries was missing. To not leave a gap, we extrapolated in line with the overall trend; using the least squares method to approximate a straight line for the missing data based on what had already been reported.
Findings – Counter-intuitively, we will argue that the push toward an innovation-based economy is actually not dependent on total expenditure on R&D, but rather relies on the efficient allocation of investments and the rigorous implementation of innovation strategy. And, we will demonstrate this by showing our ideas in relation to both BRIC and GCC countries. This analysis raises fascinating points of discussion for those looking to build an innovation economy in other countries and has practical implications for policy-makers and policy implementers in all countries.
Originality/Value – First analysis of the correlation of gross expenditure on R&D (GERD) with gross domestic product (GDP) growth and Straits Times Index (STI) policy measures.
Financial accounting is described in with respect to information & operation involved in business, aspects of recording, classifying, summarizing. concepts applied for financial accounting
Intangibles and industry productivity growth: the EU economiesABACO
Participation by Cecilia Jona-Lasinio (ISTAT and LUISS) at the I Workshop of Innovation and Strategy VLC / CAMPUS Program : “The advancement of knowledge-based activities: analysis, experiences and challenges”
Public Sector Intangibles: The SPINTAN ProjectSPINTAN
Paper by Matilde Mas on the SPINTAN Project presented in the 10th World Conference on Intellectual Capital for Communities, University Paris-Sud, June 5th and 6th 2014
Driving Productivity Growth: The Importance of Firm-Specific Knowledge AssetsStructuralpolicyanalysis
Rebecca Riley National Institute of Economic and Social Research & LLAKES, OECD Global Forum on Productivity UK Workshop, HM Treasury, London 14 October 2016
Dr. Kretov Kirill - Basic classification of corporate assets. Introduction to...drkretov
Dr.Kretov Kirill (Master of Arts in Human Resource Management, and Doctor of Business Administration) explains various types of intangible assets (non-physical resources) recognized (and not) by current accounting practices. This paper is an extract from the Doctorate Thesis written by Dr.Kretov Kirill in December 2009, Geneva / Montreaux, Switzerland. The author invites everyone to participate in his ongoing survey on the site http://www.kretov.ch
This was presented by Micheal Khan at the Innovation Festival at Spier Wine Estate on 8 and 9 March 2010. The sponsor was Cape Biotech Trust to raise funds for the Southern African Innovation Network (SAINe).
Insights on the performance of the UK's science and innovation systemTera Allas
Summary slide pack drawing out main conclusions of the BIS report on "Insights from international benchmarking of the UK's science and innovation system"
Science, Innovation and the Economy: UK Challenges and OpportunitiesTera Allas
Presentation for Government Economic Service seminar in July 2014 on the role of science and innovation in economic growth and the UK's respective strengths and weaknesses
Similar to Spillovers from public intangibles (20)
Conference of the Global Forum on Productivity 2016SPINTAN
Paper by Jonathan Haskel: Productivity slowdowns and inequality speedups: what is the role of intangibles? . Conference of the Global Forum on Productivity. Lisbon 2016
The Role of Intangibles in the Public Sector-A Preliminary Study in JapanSPINTAN
Paper by Tsutomu Miyagawa on the role of intangibles in the public sector focusing on a preliminary study in Japan. Presented in the 9th World Conference on Intellectual Capital for Communities, World Bank, Paris, June 6th and 7th 2013
The European Unemployment Puzzle: implications from population agingGRAPE
We study the link between the evolving age structure of the working population and unemployment. We build a large new Keynesian OLG model with a realistic age structure, labor market frictions, sticky prices, and aggregate shocks. Once calibrated to the European economy, we quantify the extent to which demographic changes over the last three decades have contributed to the decline of the unemployment rate. Our findings yield important implications for the future evolution of unemployment given the anticipated further aging of the working population in Europe. We also quantify the implications for optimal monetary policy: lowering inflation volatility becomes less costly in terms of GDP and unemployment volatility, which hints that optimal monetary policy may be more hawkish in an aging society. Finally, our results also propose a partial reversal of the European-US unemployment puzzle due to the fact that the share of young workers is expected to remain robust in the US.
Turin Startup Ecosystem 2024 - Ricerca sulle Startup e il Sistema dell'Innov...Quotidiano Piemontese
Turin Startup Ecosystem 2024
Una ricerca de il Club degli Investitori, in collaborazione con ToTeM Torino Tech Map e con il supporto della ESCP Business School e di Growth Capital
Seminar: Gender Board Diversity through Ownership NetworksGRAPE
Seminar on gender diversity spillovers through ownership networks at FAME|GRAPE. Presenting novel research. Studies in economics and management using econometrics methods.
The secret way to sell pi coins effortlessly.DOT TECH
Well as we all know pi isn't launched yet. But you can still sell your pi coins effortlessly because some whales in China are interested in holding massive pi coins. And they are willing to pay good money for it. If you are interested in selling I will leave a contact for you. Just what'sapp this number below. I sold about 3000 pi coins to him and he paid me immediately.
+12349014282
when will pi network coin be available on crypto exchange.DOT TECH
There is no set date for when Pi coins will enter the market.
However, the developers are working hard to get them released as soon as possible.
Once they are available, users will be able to exchange other cryptocurrencies for Pi coins on designated exchanges.
But for now the only way to sell your pi coins is through verified pi vendor.
Here is the what'sapp contact of my personal pi vendor
+12349014282
how to sell pi coins in South Korea profitably.DOT TECH
Yes. You can sell your pi network coins in South Korea or any other country, by finding a verified pi merchant
What is a verified pi merchant?
Since pi network is not launched yet on any exchange, the only way you can sell pi coins is by selling to a verified pi merchant, and this is because pi network is not launched yet on any exchange and no pre-sale or ico offerings Is done on pi.
Since there is no pre-sale, the only way exchanges can get pi is by buying from miners. So a pi merchant facilitates these transactions by acting as a bridge for both transactions.
How can i find a pi vendor/merchant?
Well for those who haven't traded with a pi merchant or who don't already have one. I will leave the what'sapp number of my personal pi merchant who i trade pi with.
Message: +12349014282 VIA Whatsapp.
#pi #sell #nigeria #pinetwork #picoins #sellpi #Nigerian #tradepi #pinetworkcoins #sellmypi
What price will pi network be listed on exchangesDOT TECH
The rate at which pi will be listed is practically unknown. But due to speculations surrounding it the predicted rate is tends to be from 30$ — 50$.
So if you are interested in selling your pi network coins at a high rate tho. Or you can't wait till the mainnet launch in 2026. You can easily trade your pi coins with a merchant.
A merchant is someone who buys pi coins from miners and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold massive quantities till mainnet launch.
I will leave the what's app number of my personal pi vendor to trade with.
+12349014282
1. Spillovers from public intangibles
C. Corrado, (The Conference Board), New York
J. Haskel, (Imperial College, CEPR and IZA), London
C. Jona-Lasinio, (LUISS Lab and ISTAT), Rome
Society for Economic Measurement Annual Conference
6-8 July 2016, Thessaloniki, Greece
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for
research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No. 612774
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 1 / 20
2. Background
• The public sector is a major investor in many intangible assets (e.g. education,
training and R&D), as well as more tangible assets such as roads and telecoms
infrastructure. The analysis of possible public sector spillovers to the private sector
typically looks (in isolation) at three main public sector investments, in
• (a) R&D
• (b) education
• (c) infrastructure, but there are of course many other assets.
• Spillovers from public R&D to the market sector has been studied for Europe by for
example Guellec and van Pottelsberghe (2002, and 2004), Salter and Martin (2002)
and Park (1995).
• One area of spillovers from the Public Sector that has attracted much attention is
spillovers from general education to growth (Krueger and Lindahl, 2001; Bassanini
and Scarpetta, 2002; Arnold et al. 2007; Inklaar, Timmer and van Ark, 2008;
Dearden, Reed and van Reenen, 2006)
• ......but there are very few studies of possible spillovers from a wider set of public
intangibles to productivity growth.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 2 / 20
3. Knowledge based capital in the total economy
correspondence for computer software, purchased investments in organizational capital, and
function-specific worker capital (employer-provided training) is of course far closer.
Table 3: Knowledge Capital in a Total Economy
Market Sector Nonmarket Sector
Computerized Information Information, Scientific, and Cultural Assets
1 Software 1 Software
2 Databases 2 Open data
Innovative Property
3 R&D, broadly defined to 3 R&D, basic and applied science
include all NPD costs
4 Entertainment & artistic originals 4 Cultural and heritage, including
5 Design arch. & eng. design
6 Mineral exploration 5 Mineral exploration
Economic Competencies Societal Competencies
7 Brands 6 Brands
8 Organizational capital 7 Organizational capital
(a) Manager capital (a) Professional and manager capital
(b) Purchased organizational services (b) Purchased organizational services
9 Firm-specific human capital 8 Function-specific human capital
(employer-provided training) (employer-provided training)
Note—NPD=New Product Development, including testing and spending for new financial products
and other services development not included in software or conventional science-based R&D.
The circled items are rather di↵erent in a public sector context. Open data refers to in-Source: Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio (2014), SPINTAN Working Paper N.1
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 3 / 20
4. The scope of intangible assets used by the public sector:
industries of interest
laboratories, public parks and museums) in many countries; see table 1 below. The use of “mar-
ket” vs. “nonmarket” groupings of industries is thus not precise because an industry can reflect
activity carried out by a mix of producers, as is evident with NACE Section R and the larger
section of which NACE Section MB is a part.4
Table 1: SPINTAN Industries of Interest
nace nace
section Industry title number
MB Scientific research and development 72
O Public administration and defence; compulsory social security 84
P Education 85
QA Human health activities 86
QB Residential care and social work activities 87-88
R Creative, arts and entertainment activities;
libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities 90-91
Gambling and betting activities;
sports activities and amusement and recreation activities 92-93
Note—NACE Rev. 2.
Before we leave the subject of NACE-defined industries, it must be said that in some countries
there are industries with significant government or nonmarket production besides those listed
in table 1. These tend to be industries that engage in activities not germane to our topic areas,
Besides Public administration and defence, other industries in the
table contain a mix of market and nonmarket producers.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 4 / 20
5. Aim
The analysis of spillovers from public Non R&D intangibles is a new territory to
be explored looking at all the possible channels trough which market and
nonmarket sectors interact. Thus we start investigating:
• the synergies between nonmarket intangibles and business sector productivity
performance and their impact on country’s economic growth.
• complementarity/substitutability between market and nonmarket intangibles
• the mechanisms through which nonmarket intangibles spillover to the private
sector exploring the relation between market sector TFP growth and different
measures of public sector knowledge creation using a cross-country-industry
econometric analysis.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 5 / 20
6. Data
• Database with multiple dimensions: country, industry,
institutional sector, time
• Tangible and intangible assets (NA, INTAN Invest and SPINTAN)
• 20 industries (A-U Nace Rev 2), 1995-2013, so far 12 countries:
• US
• Big Northern Europe: DE, FR, UK
• Scandinavian: DK FI, SE
• Small Europe: AT, CZ, NL
• Mediterranean: ES, IT
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 6 / 20
11. Empirical strategy 1
• We extend the time span of our previous work about spillovers
from market sector intangible capital, where we looked at 10
major European countries, over the period 1998-2007 (Corrado,
Haskel, Jona-Lasinio, 2014).
• We founded evidence of productivity spillovers to increases in
market sector intangible capital.
• Our finding of growth spillovers to intangible capital was
robust to whether R&D is included or excluded and with IV,
consistently with an underlying mechanism producing a
growth dividend to investments in non-R&D intangibles.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 11 / 20
12. Empirical strategy 2
Main steps:
• Check for spillovers to intangibles over 1998-2013.
Did the occurrence of the financial crisis affect (CHJL, 2014)
results?
• Investigate spillovers from nonmarket sector intangibles
distinguishing between R&D and NonR&D intangible capital.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 12 / 20
13. Econometrics
∆ln(TFPc,t) = β1∆ln(KICT
s,c,t) + β2∆ln(KNonICT
s,c,t ) (1)
+ β3∆ln(Ri
s,c,t) + β4∆ln(Ls,c,t)
+ β5∆ln(Xj
s,c,t) + λc + λt + ηs,c,t .
where s= market, nonmarket sector, i= intangible asset types and ∆ln(Xj
) are
other controls depending on the sectoral and asset disaggregation.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 13 / 20
16. Summing up
• Spillovers from Non R&D market intangibles are identified
supporting previous findings (CHJL, 2014)
• Coherently with existing empirical literature (Guellec and van
Pottelsberghe (2002, and 2004)) our findings support the
existence of spillovers from nonmarket R&D to market sector
productivity.
• Correlations between market and nonmarket intangibles are
positive suggesting complementarities more relevant for Non R&D
intangibles.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 16 / 20
17. Conclusions Policy challenges
• A primary characteristic of intangible capital, widely supported by
growth accounting exercises and macroeconomic studies, is to be
growth-promoting.
• This is because intangible investments likely generate spillovers to
the economic system being non-rival and possibly non-excludable.
Such spillovers, if they exist, might be within the private sector
and/or between the public and private sector.
• In the light of the prolonged productivity slowdown experienced by
many advanced countries after the financial crisis, it would be
vital to know which, if any, public sector intangibles had positive
spillovers to the rest of the economy.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 17 / 20
19. in progress...
• As a first step, we will investigate the relationship between market sector
labor productivity and public intangibles estimating a production function
augmented with market and nonmarket sector intangible capital.
∆ln(Vs,c,t/Ls,c,t) = α1∆ln(KICT
s,c,t/Ls,c,t) + α2∆ln(KNonICT
s,c,t /Ls,c,t) (2)
+ α3∆ln(Rs,c,t/Ls,c,t) + λc + λt + ηs,c,t .
Where s refers to market and to nonmarket sectors (s=mk, nm), c to the
countries and t is time. λc + λt are country and time dummies.
• We test equation (1) to check the linkages between market sector labor
productivity growth and nonmarket sector intangibles accounting also for
R&D and Non R&D intangible capital.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 19 / 20
20. in progress...
• As a second step, we will analyze the complementary/substitute relationship
between market and nonmarket intangibles distinguishing between R&D and
NonR&D intangible capital.
∆ln(RZ
mk,c,t/Lmk,c,t) = β1∆ln(KICT
mk,c,t/Lmk,c,t) + β2∆ln(KNonICT
mk,c,t /Lmk,c,t)
(3)
+ β3∆ln(RZ
mk,c,t/Lmk,c,t) + β4∆ln(RZ
nm,c,t/Lnm,c,t)
+ β5∆ln(Xj
s,c,t/Ls,c,t))
+ λc + λt + ηs,c,t .
where Z= total, NonR&D intangible capital and ∆ln(Xj
) are other controls
(such as ∆ln(RR&D
s,c,t ), ∆ln(Q/L)s,c,t ) depending on the dependent variable
being total or NonR&D intangible capital.
Corrado, Haskel, Jona-Lasinio SPINTAN 20 / 20