A presentation I did in April 2012 for the Preparing Future Physicists group at CU-Boulder. Discusses my career in science writing and education, and effective communication strategies.
This is from my invited talk at AAPT.
Why leave it up to the “experts” (i.e., the media) to portray physics accurately and positively? Speak for yourself, without the need for a translator who may – or may not – get it right. As a scientist, you can talk about what your work means and why it’s important with an authority that a science writer doesn’t bring to the table. While we can’t all be Brian Greene, you can have control over how your work – and physics in general – is presented to the public. In this talk, I’ll share some best practices of science communication – gleaned during my time as a science reporter at NPR and elsewhere. These simple tips can take a lifetime to master, but can help you get your message across – to the public, the media, and even Aunt Mabel.
This is from my invited talk at AAPT.
Why leave it up to the “experts” (i.e., the media) to portray physics accurately and positively? Speak for yourself, without the need for a translator who may – or may not – get it right. As a scientist, you can talk about what your work means and why it’s important with an authority that a science writer doesn’t bring to the table. While we can’t all be Brian Greene, you can have control over how your work – and physics in general – is presented to the public. In this talk, I’ll share some best practices of science communication – gleaned during my time as a science reporter at NPR and elsewhere. These simple tips can take a lifetime to master, but can help you get your message across – to the public, the media, and even Aunt Mabel.
The quasi-linear dynamics of a career in science educationStephanie Chasteen
This is a talk that I gave for the University of Oregon Women in Science group on my career in science research, science journalism, museums, teacher education, and education research, culminating in my own consulting business.
What every teacher should know about cognitive scienceStephanie Chasteen
This is a presentation that I've given a few times for GK12 programs at CU, with some main messages on how people learn and a non-exhaustive look at findings from cognitive science, and how these ideas might apply to the classroom.
John A. Pollock - How People Learn: Stories from Transmedia for STEM and Heal...SeriousGamesAssoc
Presenter: John A. Pollock, Partnership in Education, Duquesne University
This presentation will provide advice through examples of successful and not so successful interactive media projects. Our perspective is from an academic world, where evaluation and assessment are integrated into the entire logic model of development and workflow. Out goal is to produce innovative and engaging resources that enrich STEM and health literacy. While our target audience are late elementary through middle-school tweens, projects are developed with a general public audience in mind. Many projects have benefited from development carried out in concert with co-development of exhibits for local science museums, which then transition to schools and general public use. The materials produced have included animated digital dome, group interactive media, single-player video games, Apps, and interactive museum exhibits, tangible exhibits, comic books and broadcast television. Published studies on statistically significant learning will be discussed along with the imperative undercurrent of the need for the gaming experience to be fun.
7-2 Short Answer Important AnswersMegan GeorgeThi.docxblondellchancy
7-2 Short Answer:
Important
Answers
Megan George
This Photo by Unknown author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND.
https://loonylabs.org/2015/08/20/primates-hiv/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
How does understanding the science behind the
topic and research you have chosen benefit you?
•Understanding the science behind the topic as well as
the research benefits by allowing myself to gain more
knowledge towards primate's human-like capabilities
such as their methods for communication.
• I believe the advantage of understanding the science
behind this issue for both myself as well as those
around me is that it will enable us to learn more about
the evolution of human beings along with the
reasoning humans as to why humans are more
developed than other primates.
What is the advantage to you, and potentially
those around you, of understanding the science
behind the issue?
• Finding the answer to the question posed in Project 2 “If the
monkeys can combine only two speech items, how did human beings
evolve from this to be able to come up with infinite combinations?”
could affect others around me by providing them more insight into
the beginning stages of human evolution along with more reasoning
as to why we’ve developed and become capable of communication
whereas other primates are slowly still just gaining these techniques.
How might finding the answer to the specific question you
posed in the question development worksheet in Project 2
affect others around you?
SCI 100 Question Development Worksheet
Answer the following questions. Your instructor will use these answers to evaluate the critical elements for
Project 2.
1. Why did you select your news story? What about the story makes it interesting to you both personally
and scientifically?
Since childhood, I’ve been fascinated with primates specifically Apes, Gorillas, and Orangutans, which is the
primary reason this news story caught my attention. I would be interested in learning more about primates
human-related capabilities.
2. What did you already know about the topic before selecting the news story? What opinions or
assumptions had you made about it?
I knew primates such as chimpanzees share a large portion of DNA with us humans based on prior interest in
primates. I knew that we had similar physical and behavioral traits. I was never aware primates could
communicate by combining two items in a language sequence, I assumed like most animals communication was
with sounds like grunting or even body language.
3. Which concepts covered in the course relate to your news story? How?
Some concepts from this course relate to the news story I chose such as module two: Separating Good Science
From Bad Science. Understanding the difference between good and bad science allows people to decide
whether the information is valid or invalid. The research found in my article has been made by several reputable
sources, therefor ...
ere is a severe shortage of quali ed secondary physics teachers in
the United States: 63% of all high school physics teachers lack either a degree in physics or teacher certi cation. A fundamental cause is that few physics departments are engaged in the preparation of physics teachers, due to lack of professional rewards, negative attitudes about teaching among faculty, di culty working with the college of education, and other factors. Despite such barriers, each year a select few physics departments manage to graduate ve or more quali ed physics teachers annually from their teacher preparation programs. What can we learn from such “thriving programs” to help other programs emulate such results? In this talk we will present our initial results from development and validation of the Physics Teacher Education Program Assessment (P-TEPA). e P-TEPA is a detailed rubric – based on prior work in
the eld – which systematically characterizes elements that typify such “thriving programs”. e P-TEPA is intended to be used by researchers and program leaders to understand and improve physics teacher preparation programs.
As part of the Joint Task Force on Undergraduate Physics Programs
SUMMER MEETING JULY 22-26 Cincinnati, OH
How Can We Implement Phys21
2017
Wednesday
(J-TUPP), I was commissioned to develop a series of “case studies”
of exemplary programs: Undergraduate physics programs that had implemented signi cant activities to prepare their physics students
for diverse careers. e varied approaches used by these programs are inspirational. Some programs were very intentional about focusing on student experience, others focused on curricular innovations, embraced experimentation and continuous improvement, or focused on novel and exciting science. In this talk I will share what these philosophies looked like in practice, including particularly transportable ideas and processes (e.g., assessment committees, strong public relations, strategies for the introductory course, career seminars). In this talk, you will learn about the strategies used in this program and how they might inform work at your home institution.
More Related Content
Similar to Speaking of Physics: The Art of Science Communication
The quasi-linear dynamics of a career in science educationStephanie Chasteen
This is a talk that I gave for the University of Oregon Women in Science group on my career in science research, science journalism, museums, teacher education, and education research, culminating in my own consulting business.
What every teacher should know about cognitive scienceStephanie Chasteen
This is a presentation that I've given a few times for GK12 programs at CU, with some main messages on how people learn and a non-exhaustive look at findings from cognitive science, and how these ideas might apply to the classroom.
John A. Pollock - How People Learn: Stories from Transmedia for STEM and Heal...SeriousGamesAssoc
Presenter: John A. Pollock, Partnership in Education, Duquesne University
This presentation will provide advice through examples of successful and not so successful interactive media projects. Our perspective is from an academic world, where evaluation and assessment are integrated into the entire logic model of development and workflow. Out goal is to produce innovative and engaging resources that enrich STEM and health literacy. While our target audience are late elementary through middle-school tweens, projects are developed with a general public audience in mind. Many projects have benefited from development carried out in concert with co-development of exhibits for local science museums, which then transition to schools and general public use. The materials produced have included animated digital dome, group interactive media, single-player video games, Apps, and interactive museum exhibits, tangible exhibits, comic books and broadcast television. Published studies on statistically significant learning will be discussed along with the imperative undercurrent of the need for the gaming experience to be fun.
7-2 Short Answer Important AnswersMegan GeorgeThi.docxblondellchancy
7-2 Short Answer:
Important
Answers
Megan George
This Photo by Unknown author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND.
https://loonylabs.org/2015/08/20/primates-hiv/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
How does understanding the science behind the
topic and research you have chosen benefit you?
•Understanding the science behind the topic as well as
the research benefits by allowing myself to gain more
knowledge towards primate's human-like capabilities
such as their methods for communication.
• I believe the advantage of understanding the science
behind this issue for both myself as well as those
around me is that it will enable us to learn more about
the evolution of human beings along with the
reasoning humans as to why humans are more
developed than other primates.
What is the advantage to you, and potentially
those around you, of understanding the science
behind the issue?
• Finding the answer to the question posed in Project 2 “If the
monkeys can combine only two speech items, how did human beings
evolve from this to be able to come up with infinite combinations?”
could affect others around me by providing them more insight into
the beginning stages of human evolution along with more reasoning
as to why we’ve developed and become capable of communication
whereas other primates are slowly still just gaining these techniques.
How might finding the answer to the specific question you
posed in the question development worksheet in Project 2
affect others around you?
SCI 100 Question Development Worksheet
Answer the following questions. Your instructor will use these answers to evaluate the critical elements for
Project 2.
1. Why did you select your news story? What about the story makes it interesting to you both personally
and scientifically?
Since childhood, I’ve been fascinated with primates specifically Apes, Gorillas, and Orangutans, which is the
primary reason this news story caught my attention. I would be interested in learning more about primates
human-related capabilities.
2. What did you already know about the topic before selecting the news story? What opinions or
assumptions had you made about it?
I knew primates such as chimpanzees share a large portion of DNA with us humans based on prior interest in
primates. I knew that we had similar physical and behavioral traits. I was never aware primates could
communicate by combining two items in a language sequence, I assumed like most animals communication was
with sounds like grunting or even body language.
3. Which concepts covered in the course relate to your news story? How?
Some concepts from this course relate to the news story I chose such as module two: Separating Good Science
From Bad Science. Understanding the difference between good and bad science allows people to decide
whether the information is valid or invalid. The research found in my article has been made by several reputable
sources, therefor ...
ere is a severe shortage of quali ed secondary physics teachers in
the United States: 63% of all high school physics teachers lack either a degree in physics or teacher certi cation. A fundamental cause is that few physics departments are engaged in the preparation of physics teachers, due to lack of professional rewards, negative attitudes about teaching among faculty, di culty working with the college of education, and other factors. Despite such barriers, each year a select few physics departments manage to graduate ve or more quali ed physics teachers annually from their teacher preparation programs. What can we learn from such “thriving programs” to help other programs emulate such results? In this talk we will present our initial results from development and validation of the Physics Teacher Education Program Assessment (P-TEPA). e P-TEPA is a detailed rubric – based on prior work in
the eld – which systematically characterizes elements that typify such “thriving programs”. e P-TEPA is intended to be used by researchers and program leaders to understand and improve physics teacher preparation programs.
As part of the Joint Task Force on Undergraduate Physics Programs
SUMMER MEETING JULY 22-26 Cincinnati, OH
How Can We Implement Phys21
2017
Wednesday
(J-TUPP), I was commissioned to develop a series of “case studies”
of exemplary programs: Undergraduate physics programs that had implemented signi cant activities to prepare their physics students
for diverse careers. e varied approaches used by these programs are inspirational. Some programs were very intentional about focusing on student experience, others focused on curricular innovations, embraced experimentation and continuous improvement, or focused on novel and exciting science. In this talk I will share what these philosophies looked like in practice, including particularly transportable ideas and processes (e.g., assessment committees, strong public relations, strategies for the introductory course, career seminars). In this talk, you will learn about the strategies used in this program and how they might inform work at your home institution.
Lessons learned from 8 years of educational transformation (AAPT 2014)Stephanie Chasteen
In 2005, the Science Education Initiative (SEI) at the University of Colorado was launched as a 5 million-dollar, university-funded project to support departments in improving science education (http://www.colorado.edu/sei). The SEI has funded work across 7 STEM departments and dozens of courses to institute a scientific approach to educational reform driven by three questions: What should students learn? What are students learning? Which instructional approaches improve student learning? The SEI is structured with a small team of central staff, and a cohort of Science Teaching Fellows – postdocs, hired into individual departments, who partner with faculty to identify learning goals, develop instructional materials, and research student learning. Key elements of the program are its departmental focus and bottom-up structure. As the SEI draws to a close, we have an opportunity to reflect upon the impacts of the program. This talk will highlight the outcomes of the SEI model, including both affordances, and lessons learned.
This is an updated version of my presentation about research-based effective practices in helping faculty become thoughtful users of clickers and peer instruction.
Make clickers work for you: Faciltiation and question writingStephanie Chasteen
Clickers can make teaching more effective and fun, but how does a teacher best use clickers in the class? In this interactive workshop, we’ll explore research-based ideas for questioning to achieve student engagement and deep learning. We will focus on the use of “peer instruction” in which students discuss challenging questions. We’ll compare example questions, practice writing questions, discuss common challenges, and share tips on getting students to productively reason through them. No software needed.
This is a workshop that I presented for the Faculty Teaching Excellence Program of CU-Boulder in Feb 2012.
---
This workshop will focus on writing those questions for use with peer instruction that engage students, spark their curiosity, help recap material, give you insight into their thinking, or help them learn critical ideas in your discipline. We will investigate the surprising power of multiple-choice questions to achieve critical thinking skills. We will practice writing questions that align with our goals for students, discuss the elements of effective questions, and look at various examples to get ideas for our own courses.
Classroom response systems ("clickers") offer a powerful way to increase student engagement by going beyond simple quizzes. They provide an opportunity to gather real-time feedback on student understanding. If you are new to clickers or need fresh ideas for using clickers in the classroom, please join us as we explore best clicker practices and provide tips and suggestions for using clickers in your class and for writing great questions.
From FTEP, March 15th. Stephanie Chasteen, Science Teaching Fellow, Physics
Steven Pollock, President’s Teaching Scholar and Professor of Physics
Questioning is a central part of student assessment and quizzing, but it can also be a powerful learning tool. How does a teacher use questioning effectively? What is the right number of questions to ask? How do we avoid just giving students the answer? How do we avoid embarrassing our students, or confusing the class, if they give me the wrong answer? In this interactive workshop, we’ll explore research-based tips and ideas for questioning in a way that allow us to achieve the full benefit of questioning –student engagement and deep learning. We will focus on the use of “peer instruction” – the practice of requiring students to discuss their answers to challenging questions with one another. Peer instruction is facilitated by the use of “clickers”, but many benefits of the technique can be achieved even without the technology. We’ll discuss common challenges, share tips on getting students to productively argue and reason through the questions, and ways to encourage all students to speak up in response to questions.
NoVa and Science Cafes: a Flexible Model for Public Engagement of ScienceStephanie Chasteen
An invited talk by Rachel Connolly of WGBH; delivered by Kendra Redmond of AIP, at AAPT 2012.
--
Science Cafés are conversations between scientists and the public that occur in casual settings. This flexible model for public engagement is growing in popularity and increasingly being adapted to reach a range of audiences—from teachers to teens. Since 2005, NOVA has been promoting and offering resources to Science Cafés nationally as part of the outreach strategy for NOVA scienceNOW. With the launch of our new online com- munity at www.sciencecafes.org, we now have over 200 registered cafe affiliates nationally, and four international affiliates. Come and learn about cafes and how to start or grow one in your community.
authoring New identities through Engagement in an after School Science Club, ...Stephanie Chasteen
An invited talk by Hosun Kang at the Winter meeting of AAPT.
--
There is growing evidence that out-of-school informal science programs, such as after-school science clubs, can promote science learning (NRC, 2009). We have been studying young women’s learning and participa- tion in science as they traverse across various “science spaces,” including after-school science clubs and school science classrooms, and the impact this has on their identity development (or sense of future selves in science). Findings indicate that informal learning opportunities, when they are
both continuous and complementary to school science, play critical roles in shaping how and why girls identify with science, and the ways in which such identity work can transfer from out-of-school settings to in-school settings, in ways that positively impact their participation and learning there. In my talk I focus on these findings, and describe the mechanisms of transfer that support girls in leveraging out of school learning for success in school science.
Rethinking the roles of informal science environments and classroom teachingStephanie Chasteen
An invited talk by Jim Kisiel of California State University Long Beach at AAPT 2012 Ontario.
---
Where do we really learn science? As concerns build regarding the chal- lenges of effective science teaching in the formal, K-12 learning environ- ment, we find increased attention drawn to a larger view of science learn- ing, learning that spans setting and time. A growing body of research is helping us to understand how people come to understand science outside of school settings, suggesting a more complex and more fluid sense of sci- ence learning. For this session, we?ll explore a broader conception of what it means to learn science in informal science environments (museums, parks, science centers, aquariums) as well as the challenges of leveraging such environments and institutional resources to support learning across both informal and formal learning contexts. Research related to teacher use of informal learning settings will set the stage for a variety of strategies for improving teachers? use of informal science learning institutions and other community sites.
What Do You Want Them To Learn Today? Learning Goals and Formative AssessmentStephanie Chasteen
This is the presentation on Learning Goals for FTEP at CU-Boulder by Kathy Perkins and Stephanie Chasteen, February 22 2012.
--
Students don’t always learn what it is that we intend to teach them. In several science departments, faculty are addressing this gap by collaboratively deciding on just what it is that they want students to take away from a particular course or lecture. These learning goals have been valuable as a communication tool among faculty and between faculty and students so that everybody knows what the outcomes of the course are meant to be. Once these goals are written, it’s also much easier to write exams and other assessments. But writing clear learning goals takes some practice. In this interactive workshop, you’ll get that practice – in defining goals and designing assessments that address those goals. You will work in groups with faculty from similar disciplines to generate and analyze goals and questions, and will discus how to put ongoing assessment of your students into practice. You are encouraged to work on a class you are currently teaching, so you can apply the techniques immediately.
Make clickers work for you: Engagement and assessment in K12 classroomsStephanie Chasteen
This is from a webinar that I did for i>clicker aimed at K12 audiences, February 15th.
----
We'll show you how classroom response systems ("clickers") offer a powerful way to increase student engagement by going beyond simple quizzes. Challenging conceptual questions provide an opportunity for peer instruction as students discuss answers with their classmates, giving teachers a chance to hear student ideas and misconceptions by listening to their conversations. The real-time histogram of students responses to these multiple-choice questions also provide instant feedback to both teachers and students as to the precise level of student understanding on that particular topic. Clicker questions can also be posed before and after instruction, giving quantitative information about the effectiveness of a variety of types of instruction. We'll share ideas for question writing, give you practice to write your own questions and receive feedback, and provide a wealth of tips for facilitating class discussion and getting students to buy in to this teaching technique.
I will make the case that we often stick to a flawed model of communication when we disseminate the results of physics education research (PER) to teachers. We have a similar problem to those who study climate change or tobacco epidemiology; we have data that we think should effect behavior change (i.e., instruction). Why doesn’t it? While many instructors are aware of the instructional techniques that PER has demonstrated to be effective, research is showing that many instructors may miss the point of these methods, or quit using them after just one semester. Just as climate scientists have needed to become versed in public communication, so do we need to become versed in communication with our audience (physicists). I will outline some of the lessons we can learn from the research and practice of public science communication, and discuss the power and limits of communication in effecting behavior change.
This is a shorter version of an hour talk given at FFPERPS.
Phystec Conference: The Gentle Art of Questioning. Writing Great Clicker Qu...Stephanie Chasteen
How does a teacher use questioning effectively? This workshop will focus on writing those questions that engage students, spark their curiosity, help recap material, give you insight into their thinking, or help them learn critical ideas in physics. We will focus on "peer instruction" -- a research-tested method of requiring students to discuss challenging questions with one another. We will investigate the surprising power of multiple-choice questions to achieve critical thinking skills. Finally, we will look at writing questions that align with our goals for students, discuss the elements of effective questions, and practice writing questions and work on improving them.
CU Berkeley Workshop #2: Making it work, Effective Facilitation of Clicker Q...Stephanie Chasteen
So now you’ve got some great questions to use with clickers, but that’s no magic bullet. What might go wrong, and how do we avoid common pitfalls? How do we avoid just giving students the answer, or what if students are reluctant to discuss the questions? In this interactive workshop, we’ll explore research-based tips and ideas for questioning in a way that allow us to achieve the full benefit of clickers and peer instruction. We’ll discuss common challenges, share tips on getting students to productively argue and reason through the questions, and ways to encourage all students to speak up in response to questions. Time-depending, participants will also get a chance to practice aspects of teaching through questioning.
CU Berkeley Workshop #1: Writing Great Clicker QuestionsStephanie Chasteen
How does a teacher use questioning effectively? This workshop will focus on writing those questions that engage students, spark their curiosity, help recap material, give you insight into their thinking, or help them learn critical ideas in your discipline. We will focus on the use of clickers with "peer instruction" -- a research-tested method of requiring students to discuss challenging questions with one another. We will discuss how clickers can help facilitate this teaching strategy, investigate the surprising power of multiple-choice questions to achieve critical thinking skills, plus spend time discussing the elements of effective questions and practicing writing and improving questions for our classes.
What every teacher should know about cognitive researchStephanie Chasteen
From the Colorado Science Conference (Nov, 2011)
In the past few decades, we’ve gained a wealth of information about how people learn. The results of this cognitive and education research can help us become more effective teachers. In this interactive talk, we’ll explore some of the main findings of cognitive research in a language accessible to everybody, and discuss how they can be used in our teaching.
Questioning is a central part of student assessment and quizzing, but it can also be a powerful learning tool. In this interactive workshop, we’ll explore research-based tips and ideas for achieving the full benefit of questioning. Effective use of common questioning tools -- clickers and discussion boards -- will be discussed as a means to achieve student engagement and deep learning.
Want to move your career forward? Looking to build your leadership skills while helping others learn, grow, and improve their skills? Seeking someone who can guide you in achieving these goals?
You can accomplish this through a mentoring partnership. Learn more about the PMISSC Mentoring Program, where you’ll discover the incredible benefits of becoming a mentor or mentee. This program is designed to foster professional growth, enhance skills, and build a strong network within the project management community. Whether you're looking to share your expertise or seeking guidance to advance your career, the PMI Mentoring Program offers valuable opportunities for personal and professional development.
Watch this to learn:
* Overview of the PMISSC Mentoring Program: Mission, vision, and objectives.
* Benefits for Volunteer Mentors: Professional development, networking, personal satisfaction, and recognition.
* Advantages for Mentees: Career advancement, skill development, networking, and confidence building.
* Program Structure and Expectations: Mentor-mentee matching process, program phases, and time commitment.
* Success Stories and Testimonials: Inspiring examples from past participants.
* How to Get Involved: Steps to participate and resources available for support throughout the program.
Learn how you can make a difference in the project management community and take the next step in your professional journey.
About Hector Del Castillo
Hector is VP of Professional Development at the PMI Silver Spring Chapter, and CEO of Bold PM. He's a mid-market growth product executive and changemaker. He works with mid-market product-driven software executives to solve their biggest growth problems. He scales product growth, optimizes ops and builds loyal customers. He has reduced customer churn 33%, and boosted sales 47% for clients. He makes a significant impact by building and launching world-changing AI-powered products. If you're looking for an engaging and inspiring speaker to spark creativity and innovation within your organization, set up an appointment to discuss your specific needs and identify a suitable topic to inspire your audience at your next corporate conference, symposium, executive summit, or planning retreat.
About PMI Silver Spring Chapter
We are a branch of the Project Management Institute. We offer a platform for project management professionals in Silver Spring, MD, and the DC/Baltimore metro area. Monthly meetings facilitate networking, knowledge sharing, and professional development. For event details, visit pmissc.org.
Exploring Career Paths in Cybersecurity for Technical CommunicatorsBen Woelk, CISSP, CPTC
Brief overview of career options in cybersecurity for technical communicators. Includes discussion of my career path, certification options, NICE and NIST resources.
Resumes, Cover Letters, and Applying OnlineBruce Bennett
This webinar showcases resume styles and the elements that go into building your resume. Every job application requires unique skills, and this session will show you how to improve your resume to match the jobs to which you are applying. Additionally, we will discuss cover letters and learn about ideas to include. Every job application requires unique skills so learn ways to give you the best chance of success when applying for a new position. Learn how to take advantage of all the features when uploading a job application to a company’s applicant tracking system.
MISS TEEN GONDA 2024 - WINNER ABHA VISHWAKARMADK PAGEANT
Abha Vishwakarma, a rising star from Uttar Pradesh, has been selected as the victor from Gonda for Miss High Schooler India 2024. She is a glad representative of India, having won the title through her commitment and efforts in different talent competitions conducted by DK Exhibition, where she was crowned Miss Gonda 2024.
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist modulekakomaeric00
Aims to equip people who aspire to become leaders with good qualities,and with Christian values and morals as per Biblical teachings.The you who aspire to be leaders should first read and understand what the ambassador module for leadership says about leadership and marry that to what the bible says.Christians sh
3. My points for today
Communication is necessary in today’s
careers
We can’t treat our audience like they’re
stupid (but we can’t treat them like they’re
physicists either)
The data do not speak for themselves.
6. My non-linear path
Postdoc at
PhD in Physics science museum
BA in Social teacher education
Psychology
Postdoc in physics
education research
Peace Corps
freelance writing
NPR intern
independent
business
7. My non-linear path
Postdoc at
PhD in Physics science museum
teacher prep
BA in Social teacher education
Psychology science education
& pedigree
ed.
PC picture research
communication
Peace Corps
& writing Postdoc in physics
education research
Peace Corps
freelance writing
NPR intern
independent
business
8. The career messages...
• There are great jobs in education, outreach, and
writing and communication is univerally important.
• Specialization can be great; but diversification can be
great too. We need synthesizers in this
multidisciplinary world.
• You aren’t the prisoner of initial steps towards a
career choice. You don’t always need to know where
you’re going; find the warm spot
my blog has a recent post about my non-linear career path
http://sciencegeekgirl.com
9. We need to communicate
with many audiences
• Our students
• Other academics
(across disciplines)
• The public
• The media
Image from: shirray-langley.abbozzogallery.com/
11. Changing view of science
communication
scientific literacy (1960-1980’s)
let’s educate that ignorant public
media &
public
scientists
12. the deficit model
science
“The deficit model assumes that
the public are empty vessels
waiting to be filled with useful
information upon which they
will rationally act.”
Nerlich, Koteyko, and Brown, “Theory and language of climate
change communication,” Wiley Interdisciplinary reviews, 1, 2010.
13. The current model
science & society (present)
we have the attitude problem
media &
public
scientists
image victorvoigt
14. How do you get your
message across?
What are some techniques that have
worked for you when...
★ Talking to the public?
★ Teaching your students?
15. 3
keep it know your
key
simple audience
points
metaphors,
make it
Communication analogy,
relevant
tips examples
build
no tell a
from
jargon story
familiar
18. find the story
Audio: David Kestenbaum & Tony Leggett: Superconductivity
Audio: Christopher Joyce and William Eberhard, A Spider’s Web
Image: Luc Viatour, www.lucnix.be
19. find the story
Audio: David Kestenbaum & Tony Leggett: Superconductivity
Audio: Christopher Joyce and William Eberhard, A Spider’s Web
Image: Luc Viatour, www.lucnix.be
20. How do you tell your story?
mo del
scie ntist
background
supporting details
(data)
results & conclusions
“the facts speak for themselves”
22. st m odel
journali
bottom line
key details
(data)
back-
ground
What’s your
No more than
elevator
3 main points.
speech?
23. What’s your bottom line?
Consider: What is the main message, or
“elevator speech” from:
• Your work, or
• A class period you recently attended
24. There’s more to life than accuracy
“The reason you can't walk through a
wall is that your atoms and the atoms in
the wall interact with each other. They
speak the same language”*
* it’s more complicated than that
understandability
accuracy
& interest
27. expert knowledge
what makes experts smart?
Expert knowledge is organized around
big ideas.
Most people don’t have that framework.
So start with the familiar, and build a
map.
28. ground the explanation in the
familiar
start here...
and build up to... the tough stuff.
walls &
people... atoms & electric charge neutrinos
and of course,
avoid jargon
29. why should people care?
Audio: David Kestenbaum & John Morgan: Poincare Conjecture
Image: http://www.scottberkun.com/essays/essay29.htm
30. there is a time for telling
but not too soon!
image from http://www.seniorsworldchronicle.com/2009/08/usa-professors-john-baldwin-68-and.html
31. So, it is important to
communicate well.
But we don’t just
need to repeat our
message louder
1. We need to decide what our messages are.
2. We need to make our messages accessible.
3. We need to motivate... THEN educate
4. This is important - and possible - for all
levels of physics (and in our classes!)
33. Thank you!
Notes and presentation will be posted at http://blog.sciencegeekgirl.com
Podcast @ http://perusersguide.org/podcasts
How does
this work? Maybe some physicist can tell
us, using simple language and
familiar metaphors?
Yeah, by telling us a concise interesting
and entertaining story full of
substance!