SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Some WorkCover
fusions work:
Presence of leg pain
influences outcome
Emma Johnston
Dr Ben Goss
Taylor Major
Adj Prof Paul Licina
Brisbane Private Hospital Research Group
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
We declare that in relation to this talk there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
In relation to all other possible conflicts of interest:
• Institutional support from Brisbane Private Hospital Research Group has been
received and used to employ a research assistant.
• Dr Ben Goss is an employee of NuVasive.
Paul Licina (principal author)
Emma Johnston
Ben Goss
Taylor Major
Disclaimer
Compensation and Fusion
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
• Compensation patients have low return to work rates after
surgery (50%)
• A large number still required some form of ongoing
treatment two years postoperatively (77%)
Compensation and Fusion
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
• Compensation patients have higher rates of surgery but
poorer outcomes
• Little or no improvement seen in function and disability
scores, with some worsening
? Our WorkCover patients weren’t as bad as papers suggested
• Location of preoperative pain
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Observations
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Aims
1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients
2. To determine if preoperative location of pain influences outcome
Method
Prospectively collected data
Retrospectively reviewed
10 year period (2006-2015)
Single surgeon
Single level primary interbody lumbar fusions
Degenerative conditions
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Patient Reported Outcomes
Pre-operative 6/52 postop 6/12 postop
Private WorkCover Total
465 42 507
nt back 103 12 115
g equal 269 17 286
nt leg 93 13 106
WorkCover
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Results
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time
ODI%
Private (n=465)
WorkCover (n= 42)
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
ODI
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
2
4
6
8
10
Time
BackVAS WorkCover (n=42)
Private (n=465)
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Back VAS
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
2
4
6
8
10
Time
LegVAS WorkCover (n=42)
Private (n=465)
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Leg VAS
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
ODI improvement - Private
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
DODI
n = 465
71.83% MCID better
9.89% Subjectively better
1.29% No change
4.52% Subjectively worse
0.65% MCID worse
Private change in ODI
81%
improved
1%
worse
18%
no clinically
relevant change
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
DODI
Private (n=465)
WorkCover (n= 42 )
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
ODI improvement
81% 53%
improved
1% 5%
worse
18% 42%
no clinically
relevant change
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Back VAS improvement - Private
-10
-5
0
5
10
DBackVAS
n = 465
67.53% MCID better
6.88% Subjectively better
3.87% No change
3.66% Subjectively worse
3.44% MCID worse
Private change in Back VAS
17%
no clinically
relevant change
77%
improved
4%
worse
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Back VAS improvement
79% 61%
improved
4% 11%
worse
17% 28%
no clinically
relevant change
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Leg VAS improvement - Private
-10
-5
0
5
10
DLegVAS
n = 465
65.38% MCID better
7.31% Subjectively better
7.53% No change
3.23% Subjectively worse
1.94% MCID worse
Private change in Leg VAS
19%
no clinically
relevant change
77%
improved
4%
worse
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Leg VAS improvement
77% 61%
improved
4% 8%
worse
19% 31%
no clinically
relevant change
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Aims
1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients
Postoperative improvement in both groups
WorkCover did not improve as much
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Aims
1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients
2. To determine if preoperative location of pain influences outcome
Results
Private
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Equal
Leg
Back
Back
Equal
WorkCover
Leg
Back
Equal
58%
22%
31%20%
40%
29%
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
20
40
60
Time
ODI%
LPD WorkCoverLPD Private
BPD WorkCoverBPD Private
BLE WorkCoverBLE Private
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
ODI
Back VAS
Leg VAS
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
ODI
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
20
40
60
Time
ODI%
LPD Private
BPD Private
BLE Private
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
20
40
60
Time
ODI%
LPD WorkCoverLPD Private
BPD WorkCoverBPD Private
BLE WorkCoverBLE Private
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
ODI
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
2
4
6
8
10
Time
BackVAS
BPD WorkCoverBPD Private
BLE WorkCoverBLE Private
Back VAS
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Leg VAS
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
2
4
6
8
10
Time
LegVAS
LPD WorkCoverLPD Private
Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months
0
2
4
6
8
10
Time
LegVAS
LPD WorkCoverLPD Private
BLE WorkCoverBLE Private
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Leg VAS
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Aims
1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients
2. To determine if preoperative location of pain influences outcome
WorkCover patients with leg pain do well
• WorkCover patients have less improvement in ODI and VAS
• Especially with significant preoperative back pain
• Very few are worse (5-10%)
• WorkCover patients with dominant leg pain do better
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Conclusions
• Study limited by small numbers
• If a patient has predominant leg pain, their WorkCover status
should not exclude them from surgery
• Research into back pain treatment should focus on identifying
subgroups that respond to treatment
Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
Impressions

More Related Content

More from SpinePlus

Operative management for common back conditions
Operative management for common back conditionsOperative management for common back conditions
Operative management for common back conditions
SpinePlus
 
Pain management
Pain managementPain management
Pain management
SpinePlus
 
Imaging for back pain
Imaging for back pain Imaging for back pain
Imaging for back pain
SpinePlus
 
Non-operative management for common back conditions
Non-operative management for common back conditionsNon-operative management for common back conditions
Non-operative management for common back conditions
SpinePlus
 
Patient cases
Patient casesPatient cases
Patient cases
SpinePlus
 
Surgery for common lumbar conditions
Surgery for common lumbar conditionsSurgery for common lumbar conditions
Surgery for common lumbar conditions
SpinePlus
 
Pain management
Pain managementPain management
Pain management
SpinePlus
 
Common conditions of the lumbar spine
Common conditions of the lumbar spineCommon conditions of the lumbar spine
Common conditions of the lumbar spine
SpinePlus
 
Non-operative treatment for common back conditions
Non-operative treatment for common back conditions Non-operative treatment for common back conditions
Non-operative treatment for common back conditions
SpinePlus
 
Case Presentation
Case Presentation Case Presentation
Case Presentation
SpinePlus
 
The role of surgery in common lumbar conditions
The role of surgery in common lumbar conditionsThe role of surgery in common lumbar conditions
The role of surgery in common lumbar conditions
SpinePlus
 
Lumbar Stretching
Lumbar StretchingLumbar Stretching
Lumbar Stretching
SpinePlus
 
Lumbar Stabilisation
Lumbar StabilisationLumbar Stabilisation
Lumbar Stabilisation
SpinePlus
 
Discectomy Activity Guide
Discectomy Activity GuideDiscectomy Activity Guide
Discectomy Activity Guide
SpinePlus
 
6 week discectomy
6 week discectomy6 week discectomy
6 week discectomy
SpinePlus
 
3 week discectomy
3 week discectomy3 week discectomy
3 week discectomy
SpinePlus
 
Initial Discectomy
Initial DiscectomyInitial Discectomy
Initial Discectomy
SpinePlus
 
Pain diagram and questionnaire
Pain diagram and questionnairePain diagram and questionnaire
Pain diagram and questionnaire
SpinePlus
 
Rehabilitation for back pain
Rehabilitation for back painRehabilitation for back pain
Rehabilitation for back pain
SpinePlus
 
Interventional Procedures and Opioids
Interventional Procedures and OpioidsInterventional Procedures and Opioids
Interventional Procedures and Opioids
SpinePlus
 

More from SpinePlus (20)

Operative management for common back conditions
Operative management for common back conditionsOperative management for common back conditions
Operative management for common back conditions
 
Pain management
Pain managementPain management
Pain management
 
Imaging for back pain
Imaging for back pain Imaging for back pain
Imaging for back pain
 
Non-operative management for common back conditions
Non-operative management for common back conditionsNon-operative management for common back conditions
Non-operative management for common back conditions
 
Patient cases
Patient casesPatient cases
Patient cases
 
Surgery for common lumbar conditions
Surgery for common lumbar conditionsSurgery for common lumbar conditions
Surgery for common lumbar conditions
 
Pain management
Pain managementPain management
Pain management
 
Common conditions of the lumbar spine
Common conditions of the lumbar spineCommon conditions of the lumbar spine
Common conditions of the lumbar spine
 
Non-operative treatment for common back conditions
Non-operative treatment for common back conditions Non-operative treatment for common back conditions
Non-operative treatment for common back conditions
 
Case Presentation
Case Presentation Case Presentation
Case Presentation
 
The role of surgery in common lumbar conditions
The role of surgery in common lumbar conditionsThe role of surgery in common lumbar conditions
The role of surgery in common lumbar conditions
 
Lumbar Stretching
Lumbar StretchingLumbar Stretching
Lumbar Stretching
 
Lumbar Stabilisation
Lumbar StabilisationLumbar Stabilisation
Lumbar Stabilisation
 
Discectomy Activity Guide
Discectomy Activity GuideDiscectomy Activity Guide
Discectomy Activity Guide
 
6 week discectomy
6 week discectomy6 week discectomy
6 week discectomy
 
3 week discectomy
3 week discectomy3 week discectomy
3 week discectomy
 
Initial Discectomy
Initial DiscectomyInitial Discectomy
Initial Discectomy
 
Pain diagram and questionnaire
Pain diagram and questionnairePain diagram and questionnaire
Pain diagram and questionnaire
 
Rehabilitation for back pain
Rehabilitation for back painRehabilitation for back pain
Rehabilitation for back pain
 
Interventional Procedures and Opioids
Interventional Procedures and OpioidsInterventional Procedures and Opioids
Interventional Procedures and Opioids
 

Recently uploaded

MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdf
MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdfMANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdf
MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdf
Jim Jacob Roy
 
basicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdf
basicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdfbasicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdf
basicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdf
aljamhori teaching hospital
 
Charaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyaya
Charaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyayaCharaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyaya
Charaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyaya
Dr KHALID B.M
 
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Sujoy Dasgupta
 
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness JourneyTom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
greendigital
 
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
kevinkariuki227
 
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of TastePhysiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
MedicoseAcademics
 
Evaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animals
Evaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animalsEvaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animals
Evaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animals
Shweta
 
24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all
24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all
24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all
DrSathishMS1
 
Cervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptx
Cervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptxCervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptx
Cervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptx
Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore
 
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdf
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfmicro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdf
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdf
Anurag Sharma
 
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnataka
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore KarnatakaFlu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnataka
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnataka
addon Scans
 
ARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTS
ARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTSARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTS
ARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTS
Dr. Vinay Pareek
 
The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...
The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...
The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...
Catherine Liao
 
Antiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptx
Antiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptxAntiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptx
Antiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptx
Rohit chaurpagar
 
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.GawadHemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
NephroTube - Dr.Gawad
 
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum Program
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum ProgramPrix Galien International 2024 Forum Program
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum Program
Levi Shapiro
 
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in StockFactory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
rebeccabio
 
POST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its management
POST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its managementPOST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its management
POST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its management
touseefaziz1
 
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...
GL Anaacs
 

Recently uploaded (20)

MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdf
MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdfMANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdf
MANAGEMENT OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONDUCTION BLOCK.pdf
 
basicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdf
basicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdfbasicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdf
basicmodesofventilation2022-220313203758.pdf
 
Charaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyaya
Charaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyayaCharaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyaya
Charaka Samhita Sutra Sthana 9 Chapter khuddakachatuspadadhyaya
 
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
 
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness JourneyTom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
 
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
 
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of TastePhysiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
 
Evaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animals
Evaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animalsEvaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animals
Evaluation of antidepressant activity of clitoris ternatea in animals
 
24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all
24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all
24 Upakrama.pptx class ppt useful in all
 
Cervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptx
Cervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptxCervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptx
Cervical & Brachial Plexus By Dr. RIG.pptx
 
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdf
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfmicro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdf
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdf
 
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnataka
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore KarnatakaFlu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnataka
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnataka
 
ARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTS
ARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTSARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTS
ARTHROLOGY PPT NCISM SYLLABUS AYURVEDA STUDENTS
 
The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...
The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...
The POPPY STUDY (Preconception to post-partum cardiovascular function in prim...
 
Antiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptx
Antiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptxAntiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptx
Antiulcer drugs Advance Pharmacology .pptx
 
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.GawadHemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
 
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum Program
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum ProgramPrix Galien International 2024 Forum Program
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum Program
 
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in StockFactory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
Factory Supply Best Quality Pmk Oil CAS 28578–16–7 PMK Powder in Stock
 
POST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its management
POST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its managementPOST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its management
POST OPERATIVE OLIGURIA and its management
 
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...
 

Some WorkCover fusions work

  • 1. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Emma Johnston Dr Ben Goss Taylor Major Adj Prof Paul Licina Brisbane Private Hospital Research Group
  • 2. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome We declare that in relation to this talk there are no conflicts of interest to disclose. In relation to all other possible conflicts of interest: • Institutional support from Brisbane Private Hospital Research Group has been received and used to employ a research assistant. • Dr Ben Goss is an employee of NuVasive. Paul Licina (principal author) Emma Johnston Ben Goss Taylor Major Disclaimer
  • 3. Compensation and Fusion Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome • Compensation patients have low return to work rates after surgery (50%) • A large number still required some form of ongoing treatment two years postoperatively (77%)
  • 4. Compensation and Fusion Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome • Compensation patients have higher rates of surgery but poorer outcomes • Little or no improvement seen in function and disability scores, with some worsening
  • 5. ? Our WorkCover patients weren’t as bad as papers suggested • Location of preoperative pain Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Observations
  • 6. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Aims 1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients 2. To determine if preoperative location of pain influences outcome
  • 7. Method Prospectively collected data Retrospectively reviewed 10 year period (2006-2015) Single surgeon Single level primary interbody lumbar fusions Degenerative conditions Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome
  • 8. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Patient Reported Outcomes Pre-operative 6/52 postop 6/12 postop
  • 9. Private WorkCover Total 465 42 507 nt back 103 12 115 g equal 269 17 286 nt leg 93 13 106 WorkCover Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Results
  • 10. Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time ODI% Private (n=465) WorkCover (n= 42) Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome ODI
  • 11. Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time BackVAS WorkCover (n=42) Private (n=465) Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Back VAS
  • 12. Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time LegVAS WorkCover (n=42) Private (n=465) Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Leg VAS
  • 13. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome ODI improvement - Private -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 DODI n = 465 71.83% MCID better 9.89% Subjectively better 1.29% No change 4.52% Subjectively worse 0.65% MCID worse Private change in ODI 81% improved 1% worse 18% no clinically relevant change
  • 14. -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 DODI Private (n=465) WorkCover (n= 42 ) Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome ODI improvement 81% 53% improved 1% 5% worse 18% 42% no clinically relevant change
  • 15. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Back VAS improvement - Private -10 -5 0 5 10 DBackVAS n = 465 67.53% MCID better 6.88% Subjectively better 3.87% No change 3.66% Subjectively worse 3.44% MCID worse Private change in Back VAS 17% no clinically relevant change 77% improved 4% worse
  • 16. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Back VAS improvement 79% 61% improved 4% 11% worse 17% 28% no clinically relevant change
  • 17. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Leg VAS improvement - Private -10 -5 0 5 10 DLegVAS n = 465 65.38% MCID better 7.31% Subjectively better 7.53% No change 3.23% Subjectively worse 1.94% MCID worse Private change in Leg VAS 19% no clinically relevant change 77% improved 4% worse
  • 18. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Leg VAS improvement 77% 61% improved 4% 8% worse 19% 31% no clinically relevant change
  • 19. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Aims 1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients Postoperative improvement in both groups WorkCover did not improve as much
  • 20. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Aims 1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients 2. To determine if preoperative location of pain influences outcome
  • 21. Results Private Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Equal Leg Back Back Equal WorkCover Leg Back Equal 58% 22% 31%20% 40% 29%
  • 22. Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 20 40 60 Time ODI% LPD WorkCoverLPD Private BPD WorkCoverBPD Private BLE WorkCoverBLE Private Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome ODI Back VAS Leg VAS
  • 23. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome ODI Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 20 40 60 Time ODI% LPD Private BPD Private BLE Private
  • 24. Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 20 40 60 Time ODI% LPD WorkCoverLPD Private BPD WorkCoverBPD Private BLE WorkCoverBLE Private Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome ODI
  • 25. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time BackVAS BPD WorkCoverBPD Private BLE WorkCoverBLE Private Back VAS
  • 26. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Leg VAS Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time LegVAS LPD WorkCoverLPD Private
  • 27. Pre-operative 6 weeks 6 months 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time LegVAS LPD WorkCoverLPD Private BLE WorkCoverBLE Private Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Leg VAS
  • 28. Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Aims 1. To quantify the outcomes of WorkCover fusion patients 2. To determine if preoperative location of pain influences outcome WorkCover patients with leg pain do well
  • 29. • WorkCover patients have less improvement in ODI and VAS • Especially with significant preoperative back pain • Very few are worse (5-10%) • WorkCover patients with dominant leg pain do better Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Conclusions
  • 30. • Study limited by small numbers • If a patient has predominant leg pain, their WorkCover status should not exclude them from surgery • Research into back pain treatment should focus on identifying subgroups that respond to treatment Some WorkCover fusions work: Presence of leg pain influences outcome Impressions

Editor's Notes

  1. Good morning my name is Emma Johnston and I am a second year medical student at the University of Melbourne. Prior to this I was our groups research assistant for nearly 5 years. Thank you for allowing me to present today.
  2. These are our disclosures.
  3. As we are all well aware, the perception of spinal fusion for compensation patients is negative This paper was published by professor Ian Harris in 2012 showing poor outcomes in workers compensation patients after surgery.
  4. A more recent study had similar conclusions.
  5. However, anecdotally, our outcomes weren’t as bad as some of these papers indicated WorkCover being the QLD Workers Compensation scheme We thought that the type of pre-operative pain may be important
  6. So we conducted this study to quantify the outcomes we were seeing for WorkCover patients And to also look at whether the location of preoperative pain influences postoperative outcome
  7. We retrospectively reviewed data that was prospectively collected. All primary single level interbody fusions performed over a 10 year period for degenerative conditions by a single surgeon were included.
  8. PRO were collected pre-operatively and at 6 wks, 6 months postoperatively. Standard protocol for patient review meant that all patient data was available Oswestry Disability Index and back and leg Visual Analogue Score were collected
  9. 507 patients were included in the study WC patients represented less than 10% of the cohort
  10. As expected, we found that the average ODI improved for both groups but that the improvement was greater in the private patient group.
  11. The same trend was seen for back pain
  12. And for leg pain.
  13. To look at this data more closely we analysed the amount of change in each of the patient reported outcomes from preop to 6 months postop. Most patients improved. But taking into account the Minimum Clinically Important Difference or MCID of 12.8 for ODI, some patients fell into the grey zone of no clinically meaningful improvement. More than 80% of private patients achieved this MCID.
  14. However, just over half of WorkCover patients improved above the MCID. More WorkCover than private patients fell into the group of no clinically meaningful improvement. Importantly, however, very few were worse.
  15. For back VAS the MCID is 1.2. Again, nearly 80% of private patients improved above this level.
  16. However, only 60% of WorkCover patients had a meaningful improvement.
  17. We saw a similar trend for leg pain with almost 80% of private patients
  18. And just over 60% of WorkCover patients achieving MCID.
  19. So for our first aim, we found that there was postoperative improvement in both groups but that the WorkCover group did not improve as much. We also felt the WorkCover results were not as dismal as some people think.
  20. Now to our second aim which is to determine whether the location of preoperative pain has any influence on outcome
  21. To assess this the private and WorkCover groups were further subdivided based on the dominant preoperative pain location. ____ The 3 groups were patients who had predominantly leg pain, predominately back pain or equal amounts of back and leg pain. Patients were considered equal if their back and leg VAS were within 2 points of each other. There was some difference in the proportion of each group between private and WorkCover patients.
  22. Next I am going to show you a series of graphs focusing on pain location. The LPD patients are in the darkest shade (of blue for private and red for WC) We will look at the PROMS being ODI and back and leg VAS.
  23. First ODI We saw that private patients did equally well, regardless of their dominant preoperative pain location.
  24. Whereas in the WC group leg pain patients did better, nearly as well as private patients.
  25. For Back VAS we saw that patients were very different, depending on whether they were private or WC
  26. In contrast, for leg VAS, the patients with predominatley leg pain had very similar improvements, regardless of their WC status.
  27. As soon as there is a significant element of back pain the numbers are very different.
  28. So for our second aim, we have isolated a group where WC status does not seem to influence outcome. These are patients where preoperative leg pain exceeds back pain. Another way of looking at that is if back pain is equal or greater than leg pain, WC patients do poorly.
  29. In conclusion, WC patients undergoing spinal fusion do not do as well as private patients. Especially if they have significant preoperative back pain. Fortunately, very few are subjectively worse. A sub-group of WC patients, those with mainly leg pain preoperatively, do well.
  30. This study and its results are significantly limited by the small numbers. But maybe we can draw from this that WC patients with leg pain should not necessarily be excluded from surgery. As we have heard at this meeting from Dr McCombe and others, as clinicians we know many interventions are effective even if unable to be proven in RCTs. We recognise patients with back pain are heterogenous and combining them into one big group may mask possible benefits in subgroups. Perhaps this type of study is where the focus should be. It may be fruitless to undertake more and more large RCTs to prove a treatment works or doesn’t work. We need to look at treatments where outcome varies and further define the factors which are associated with a good clinical outcome.