This document contains practice exam questions for A2 Unit 4 covering three sections:
Section 1 focuses on crime and deviance and contains 14 questions assessing various sociological perspectives on topics like labeling processes, capitalism and crime rates, gender differences, and the use of official crime statistics.
Section 2 contains 8 questions on researching crime through methods like official statistics, experiments, questionnaires, interviews, observation, and documents as applied to topics like ethnic groups, prisons, violent crime, and gang culture.
Section 3 covers sociological theory and methodology with 16 questions assessing perspectives like functionalism, Marxism, feminism, structure/agency debates, and the extent to which sociology can be objective/value-free or inform social
Towards a More Holistic Approach on Online Abuse and AntisemitismIIIT Hyderabad
In our first work, we take a holistic approach towards analysing the different forms of abusive behaviours found in the web communities. We introduce three abuse detection tasks -- 1) presence of abuse, 2) severity of abuse, 3) target of abuse. Due to the absence of a rich abuse-based dataset of considerable size, labeled across all aspects -- presence, severity, and target, we provide a corpus with 7,601 posts collected from a popular alt-right social media platform Gab, each of which is manually labeled comprehensively across all such aspects. We also propose a Transformer based text classifier which outperforms the existing baselines on each of the three proposed tasks on the presented corpus. Our proposed classifier obtains an accuracy of 80% for abuse presence, 82% for abuse target detection, and 64% for abuse severity detection.
To the best of our knowledge, both of the presented works are first in the respective directions. Through our studies we aim to lay foundation for future research works to explore the area of hate speech and online abuse in a more holistic and complete manner.
Towards a More Holistic Approach on Online Abuse and AntisemitismIIIT Hyderabad
In our first work, we take a holistic approach towards analysing the different forms of abusive behaviours found in the web communities. We introduce three abuse detection tasks -- 1) presence of abuse, 2) severity of abuse, 3) target of abuse. Due to the absence of a rich abuse-based dataset of considerable size, labeled across all aspects -- presence, severity, and target, we provide a corpus with 7,601 posts collected from a popular alt-right social media platform Gab, each of which is manually labeled comprehensively across all such aspects. We also propose a Transformer based text classifier which outperforms the existing baselines on each of the three proposed tasks on the presented corpus. Our proposed classifier obtains an accuracy of 80% for abuse presence, 82% for abuse target detection, and 64% for abuse severity detection.
To the best of our knowledge, both of the presented works are first in the respective directions. Through our studies we aim to lay foundation for future research works to explore the area of hate speech and online abuse in a more holistic and complete manner.
Running head QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE .docxtodd581
Running head: QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 8
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Student’s Name
Institution Name
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Introduction
The criminal justice field deals with people and their actions and that is why the best approach to use in studying criminal justice is a qualitative approach. A qualitative inquiry makes it possible for a researcher to understand criminals as well as those charged with the responsibility of ensuring that justice prevails. Qualitative inquiries are ideal for studying criminal justice because they are scientific methods of observation that are used to collect non-numerical data. There are numerous qualitative inquiry methods; however, there are four that are ideal for the study of the criminal justice field. The four methods are ethnography, narrative, phenomenological, and case study.
Ethnography
Ethnography is the most common qualitative research method. The method involves researchers immersing themselves in the target participant’s environment. The main focus of ethnography is for a researcher to understand the challenges, culture, goals, and themes that emerge in a participant’s environment. In the case of criminal justice, researchers get to understand the factors that make crime possible as well as the factors that make administering justice difficult.
Rios, V. M., Carney, N., & Kelekay, J. (2017). Ethnographies of race, crime, and justice: Toward a sociological double-consciousness. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 493-513.
The publication looks at how the ethnography qualitative research method is useful at revealing, explaining as well as offering solutions for issues that revolve around justice, crime, and race. According to the article, ethnography helps to shed light on the day to day contexts in which law, crimes, and punishment are produced. The article details how effective the ethnography method is useful in crime, justice and law enforcement. The article is appropriate as it captures how ethnography works. It as well details the pros and cons of the qualitative inquiry method. The article is appropriate considering its less than three years old and that it touches on the subject that its of concern.
Doll, A., & Walby, K. (2019). Institutional ethnography as a method of inquiry for criminal justice and socio-legal studies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8(1), 147.
The article focuses on the use of institutional ethnography to help understand activities and the organization of criminal justice. According to the article, the inquiry method was invented by Dorothy Smith, a Canadian sociologist. The article focuses on the analysis of texts and the mapping of textual work in legal and criminal justice organizations. The article reveals how people are governed and ruled by proc.
Running head QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE .docxjeanettehully
Running head: QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 8
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Student’s Name
Institution Name
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Introduction
The criminal justice field deals with people and their actions and that is why the best approach to use in studying criminal justice is a qualitative approach. A qualitative inquiry makes it possible for a researcher to understand criminals as well as those charged with the responsibility of ensuring that justice prevails. Qualitative inquiries are ideal for studying criminal justice because they are scientific methods of observation that are used to collect non-numerical data. There are numerous qualitative inquiry methods; however, there are four that are ideal for the study of the criminal justice field. The four methods are ethnography, narrative, phenomenological, and case study.
Ethnography
Ethnography is the most common qualitative research method. The method involves researchers immersing themselves in the target participant’s environment. The main focus of ethnography is for a researcher to understand the challenges, culture, goals, and themes that emerge in a participant’s environment. In the case of criminal justice, researchers get to understand the factors that make crime possible as well as the factors that make administering justice difficult.
Rios, V. M., Carney, N., & Kelekay, J. (2017). Ethnographies of race, crime, and justice: Toward a sociological double-consciousness. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 493-513.
The publication looks at how the ethnography qualitative research method is useful at revealing, explaining as well as offering solutions for issues that revolve around justice, crime, and race. According to the article, ethnography helps to shed light on the day to day contexts in which law, crimes, and punishment are produced. The article details how effective the ethnography method is useful in crime, justice and law enforcement. The article is appropriate as it captures how ethnography works. It as well details the pros and cons of the qualitative inquiry method. The article is appropriate considering its less than three years old and that it touches on the subject that its of concern.
Doll, A., & Walby, K. (2019). Institutional ethnography as a method of inquiry for criminal justice and socio-legal studies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8(1), 147.
The article focuses on the use of institutional ethnography to help understand activities and the organization of criminal justice. According to the article, the inquiry method was invented by Dorothy Smith, a Canadian sociologist. The article focuses on the analysis of texts and the mapping of textual work in legal and criminal justice organizations. The article reveals how people are governed and ruled by proc ...
Discus the Criminology research (updated 2023).docxintel-writers.com
Criminology research
is a vital component of the field that focuses on the scientific study of crime, criminal behavior, and the criminal justice system. It involves the systematic investigation, analysis, and interpretation of data and information to generate knowledge and understanding in the realm of crime and its various aspects.
Here are some key points to discuss regarding criminology research:
1. Objectives: Criminology research aims to examine and explain the causes, patterns, and consequences of crime. It seeks to uncover factors that contribute to criminal behavior, identify effective crime prevention strategies, evaluate the functioning of the criminal justice system, and explore the experiences and impacts of crime on individuals and communities.
2. Methodology: Criminological research utilizes a range of qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative methods, such as interviews, observations, and case studies, provide in-depth insights into individual experiences, motivations, and perceptions related to crime. Quantitative methods, such as surveys, experiments, and statistical analysis, enable researchers to collect and analyze large-scale data to identify trends, correlations, and statistical associations.
3. Areas of study: Criminology research covers a wide array of topics. It investigates various types of crime, including violent crime, property crime, organized crime, white-collar crime, and cybercrime. It explores the factors that contribute to criminal behavior, such as social, economic, psychological, and biological factors.
Criminology is the scientific study of the nature, extent, management, causes, control, consequences,
and prevention of criminal behavior, both on individual and social levels.
Research questionsIt was not known how criminal offenders percei.docxaudeleypearl
Research questions
It was not known how criminal offenders perceive and mentally represent the world around them
It was not known what role perception plays in an individual’s potential to commit crime
The basis of Cognitive theory
Cognitive is defined as an ability to process information: Cognition has to do with one's ability to learn information quickly, memorize, and understand information they receive. Therefore, cognitive theories of crime fall under the psychological theories of criminal behavior. It's important to know that there are different theories that attempt to explain acts of criminal behavior.
Cognitive-behavioral theory combines the principles of social and developmental psychology and those of experimental-clinical psychology. The theory, applied to crime and delinquency, proposes that social behavior is learned. To understand why and how people commit crimes, psychologists and sociologists often study, analyze, and develop explanations of why these behaviors exist. Cognitive theory is one of many psychological theories of criminal behavior. Cognitive theories of crime explain criminal behavior as a defect in moral thinking, thought processes, and mental development. Cognitive theories focus on how we perceive the world around us, how we think, and the factors that influence our mental development (family upbringing, parental modeling, personality, intelligence). These theories help to explain how we develop morally in our thought process. Cognitive theories also help us to understand how an individual's personality and intelligence level are linked to delinquency.
Theoretical framework : theory of cognitive development
Jean Piaget: Moral and intellectual development. People construct a mental model of the world from childhood. Thus, from birth onward an individual will continue to develop. It is a process which occurs due to biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
Bandura maintains that individuals are not born with an innate ability to act violently. He suggested that, in contrast, violence and aggression are learned through a process of behavior modeling (Bandura, 1977). In other words, children learn violence through the observation of others. Aggressive acts are modeled after three primary sources: (1) family interaction, (2) environmental experiences, and (3) the mass media.
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927–1987), who applied the concept of moral development to criminological theory. Kohlberg (1984) believed that individuals pass through stages of moral development. Most important to his theory is the notion that there are levels, stages, and social orientation. The three levels are Level I, preconventional; Level II, conventional; and Level III, postconventional. With respect to the different stages, Stages 1 and 2 fall under Level I. Stages 3 and 4 fall under Level II, and Stages 5 and 6 fall under Level III.
The next subdiscipline is the information-processing branch. This area is predicated on the no ...
Research questionsIt was not known how criminal offenders percei.docxgholly1
Research questions
It was not known how criminal offenders perceive and mentally represent the world around them
It was not known what role perception plays in an individual’s potential to commit crime
The basis of Cognitive theory
Cognitive is defined as an ability to process information: Cognition has to do with one's ability to learn information quickly, memorize, and understand information they receive. Therefore, cognitive theories of crime fall under the psychological theories of criminal behavior. It's important to know that there are different theories that attempt to explain acts of criminal behavior.
Cognitive-behavioral theory combines the principles of social and developmental psychology and those of experimental-clinical psychology. The theory, applied to crime and delinquency, proposes that social behavior is learned. To understand why and how people commit crimes, psychologists and sociologists often study, analyze, and develop explanations of why these behaviors exist. Cognitive theory is one of many psychological theories of criminal behavior. Cognitive theories of crime explain criminal behavior as a defect in moral thinking, thought processes, and mental development. Cognitive theories focus on how we perceive the world around us, how we think, and the factors that influence our mental development (family upbringing, parental modeling, personality, intelligence). These theories help to explain how we develop morally in our thought process. Cognitive theories also help us to understand how an individual's personality and intelligence level are linked to delinquency.
Theoretical framework : theory of cognitive development
Jean Piaget: Moral and intellectual development. People construct a mental model of the world from childhood. Thus, from birth onward an individual will continue to develop. It is a process which occurs due to biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
Bandura maintains that individuals are not born with an innate ability to act violently. He suggested that, in contrast, violence and aggression are learned through a process of behavior modeling (Bandura, 1977). In other words, children learn violence through the observation of others. Aggressive acts are modeled after three primary sources: (1) family interaction, (2) environmental experiences, and (3) the mass media.
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927–1987), who applied the concept of moral development to criminological theory. Kohlberg (1984) believed that individuals pass through stages of moral development. Most important to his theory is the notion that there are levels, stages, and social orientation. The three levels are Level I, preconventional; Level II, conventional; and Level III, postconventional. With respect to the different stages, Stages 1 and 2 fall under Level I. Stages 3 and 4 fall under Level II, and Stages 5 and 6 fall under Level III.
The next subdiscipline is the information-processing branch. This area is predicated on the no.
Criminological Research Essay
Criminology
Criminology Essay
Essay about Criminological Theories
criminology Essay
My Dream Career As A Criminologist
Relationship Between Crime And Criminology
Conflict Criminology
Criminology: The Evolution of Crime Essay
Criminology Career Paper
Classical Criminology Essay
Importance Of Criminology In Modern Society
Criminology And Sociology And Criminology
Essay on Criminology in the Future
Criminology : Types Of Criminal Personality
Essay On Criminology And Criminal Justice
Essay on Feminist Criminology
Classical Theory of Criminology Essay
Pursuing A Degree In Criminology Essay
Essay on Criminology
What we see may not always be the reality and what we
presume as real may not be our observation always. In a democratic
set-up, this has often emerged as a reality. Democracies had always been subjected to criticism but it is astonishing to note how the
interplay of corrupt vision and changing social attitudes playing a
havoc in our democratic systems. This paper broadly investigates
the voting behavior and attitudes in response to sophisticated
tempting actions by political parties to pull voters. This research
demonstrates that higher the level of temptation combined with
many socio-economic perils leads to higher biasness towards
them. Participatory research, interviews, journals, publications,
and observation and media reporting have been studied, analyzed,
and scrutinized to discover how different poor and illiterate people
vote. Findings and results attribute a greater role of education,
financial liberty, backwardness, and awareness to political reality
in determining voting behavior.
Discussion 1In Chapter 7 of Crime Prevention, Robinson states th.docxduketjoy27252
Discussion 1
In Chapter 7 of Crime Prevention, Robinson states that "Rational choice and deterrence theories are two related theories that help understand why criminal justice – including crime control and crime prevention activities of police, courts, and corrections – should help us reduce crime in society" (2012). Answer one of the following questions:
THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE ABOVE. THE NEXT ASSIGNMENT YOU NEED TO DO IS PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON TWO CLASSMATES POSTS. THE LENGTH MUST BE 200 WORDS EACH POST. THERE ARE TWO FEEDBACKS YOU MUST DO. MUST BE POSITIVE FEEDBACK, PROPER GRAMMAR/SENTENCE STRUCTURE, AND ANY OUTSIDE SOURCES YOU USE THAT RELATES TO THE FEEBACK FROM THE STUDENT MUST BE PROPERLY CITED/SCHOLARY SOURCE.
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.
Robinson discusses many theories in Chapters 3 through 7. Some of these theories are: Biological Theories, Psychological Theories, Integrated Theories, Social Learning Theories, Social Control Theories, Routine Activity Theories, Crime Pattern Theories, Anomie Theories, Strain Theories, Institutional Anomie Theories, Contextual anomie and strain theories, Cultural deviance or subcultural theories.
Select a theory other than rational choice or deterrence theories, and compare and/or contrast it to the post of your classmates’ and/or your instructor.
Does one of these theories clarify your understanding of the crime or criminal issue you intend to examine in your Final Project?
DISCUSSION RESPONSE FROM STUDENT ONE JAYMES W.
Rational choice theories are among the fastest growing theories in social science today. Many sociologists and political scientists defend the claim that rational choice theory can provide the basis for a unified and comprehensive theory of social behavior. What distinguishes rational choice theory from other forms of theory is that it denies the existence of any kinds of action other than the purely rational and calculative. All social action can be seen as rationally motivated, as instrumental action, however much of it may appear to be irrational or non-rational.
General deterrence strategies focus on future behaviors, preventing individuals from engaging in crime or deviant by impacting their rational decision making process. Specific deterrence focuses on punishing known deviants in order to prevent them from ever again violating the specific norms they have broken. Through the rational use of punishment as a negative sanction, problematic behavior can be cut down dramatically. Some examples are: shock sentencing, corporal punishment, mandatory arrests for certain behaviors.
Specific deterrence strategies, focuses on punishing known deviants in order to prevent them from ever again violating the specific norms they have broken. The concern here is that motives and rationales that lie behind the original behavior can, perhaps, never be delineated, but through the rational use of punishment as a negative sanction, problematic beh.
Running head QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE .docxtodd581
Running head: QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 8
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Student’s Name
Institution Name
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Introduction
The criminal justice field deals with people and their actions and that is why the best approach to use in studying criminal justice is a qualitative approach. A qualitative inquiry makes it possible for a researcher to understand criminals as well as those charged with the responsibility of ensuring that justice prevails. Qualitative inquiries are ideal for studying criminal justice because they are scientific methods of observation that are used to collect non-numerical data. There are numerous qualitative inquiry methods; however, there are four that are ideal for the study of the criminal justice field. The four methods are ethnography, narrative, phenomenological, and case study.
Ethnography
Ethnography is the most common qualitative research method. The method involves researchers immersing themselves in the target participant’s environment. The main focus of ethnography is for a researcher to understand the challenges, culture, goals, and themes that emerge in a participant’s environment. In the case of criminal justice, researchers get to understand the factors that make crime possible as well as the factors that make administering justice difficult.
Rios, V. M., Carney, N., & Kelekay, J. (2017). Ethnographies of race, crime, and justice: Toward a sociological double-consciousness. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 493-513.
The publication looks at how the ethnography qualitative research method is useful at revealing, explaining as well as offering solutions for issues that revolve around justice, crime, and race. According to the article, ethnography helps to shed light on the day to day contexts in which law, crimes, and punishment are produced. The article details how effective the ethnography method is useful in crime, justice and law enforcement. The article is appropriate as it captures how ethnography works. It as well details the pros and cons of the qualitative inquiry method. The article is appropriate considering its less than three years old and that it touches on the subject that its of concern.
Doll, A., & Walby, K. (2019). Institutional ethnography as a method of inquiry for criminal justice and socio-legal studies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8(1), 147.
The article focuses on the use of institutional ethnography to help understand activities and the organization of criminal justice. According to the article, the inquiry method was invented by Dorothy Smith, a Canadian sociologist. The article focuses on the analysis of texts and the mapping of textual work in legal and criminal justice organizations. The article reveals how people are governed and ruled by proc.
Running head QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE .docxjeanettehully
Running head: QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY METHODS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 8
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Student’s Name
Institution Name
Use of Qualitative Inquiry Methods in Criminal Justice
Introduction
The criminal justice field deals with people and their actions and that is why the best approach to use in studying criminal justice is a qualitative approach. A qualitative inquiry makes it possible for a researcher to understand criminals as well as those charged with the responsibility of ensuring that justice prevails. Qualitative inquiries are ideal for studying criminal justice because they are scientific methods of observation that are used to collect non-numerical data. There are numerous qualitative inquiry methods; however, there are four that are ideal for the study of the criminal justice field. The four methods are ethnography, narrative, phenomenological, and case study.
Ethnography
Ethnography is the most common qualitative research method. The method involves researchers immersing themselves in the target participant’s environment. The main focus of ethnography is for a researcher to understand the challenges, culture, goals, and themes that emerge in a participant’s environment. In the case of criminal justice, researchers get to understand the factors that make crime possible as well as the factors that make administering justice difficult.
Rios, V. M., Carney, N., & Kelekay, J. (2017). Ethnographies of race, crime, and justice: Toward a sociological double-consciousness. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 493-513.
The publication looks at how the ethnography qualitative research method is useful at revealing, explaining as well as offering solutions for issues that revolve around justice, crime, and race. According to the article, ethnography helps to shed light on the day to day contexts in which law, crimes, and punishment are produced. The article details how effective the ethnography method is useful in crime, justice and law enforcement. The article is appropriate as it captures how ethnography works. It as well details the pros and cons of the qualitative inquiry method. The article is appropriate considering its less than three years old and that it touches on the subject that its of concern.
Doll, A., & Walby, K. (2019). Institutional ethnography as a method of inquiry for criminal justice and socio-legal studies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 8(1), 147.
The article focuses on the use of institutional ethnography to help understand activities and the organization of criminal justice. According to the article, the inquiry method was invented by Dorothy Smith, a Canadian sociologist. The article focuses on the analysis of texts and the mapping of textual work in legal and criminal justice organizations. The article reveals how people are governed and ruled by proc ...
Discus the Criminology research (updated 2023).docxintel-writers.com
Criminology research
is a vital component of the field that focuses on the scientific study of crime, criminal behavior, and the criminal justice system. It involves the systematic investigation, analysis, and interpretation of data and information to generate knowledge and understanding in the realm of crime and its various aspects.
Here are some key points to discuss regarding criminology research:
1. Objectives: Criminology research aims to examine and explain the causes, patterns, and consequences of crime. It seeks to uncover factors that contribute to criminal behavior, identify effective crime prevention strategies, evaluate the functioning of the criminal justice system, and explore the experiences and impacts of crime on individuals and communities.
2. Methodology: Criminological research utilizes a range of qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative methods, such as interviews, observations, and case studies, provide in-depth insights into individual experiences, motivations, and perceptions related to crime. Quantitative methods, such as surveys, experiments, and statistical analysis, enable researchers to collect and analyze large-scale data to identify trends, correlations, and statistical associations.
3. Areas of study: Criminology research covers a wide array of topics. It investigates various types of crime, including violent crime, property crime, organized crime, white-collar crime, and cybercrime. It explores the factors that contribute to criminal behavior, such as social, economic, psychological, and biological factors.
Criminology is the scientific study of the nature, extent, management, causes, control, consequences,
and prevention of criminal behavior, both on individual and social levels.
Research questionsIt was not known how criminal offenders percei.docxaudeleypearl
Research questions
It was not known how criminal offenders perceive and mentally represent the world around them
It was not known what role perception plays in an individual’s potential to commit crime
The basis of Cognitive theory
Cognitive is defined as an ability to process information: Cognition has to do with one's ability to learn information quickly, memorize, and understand information they receive. Therefore, cognitive theories of crime fall under the psychological theories of criminal behavior. It's important to know that there are different theories that attempt to explain acts of criminal behavior.
Cognitive-behavioral theory combines the principles of social and developmental psychology and those of experimental-clinical psychology. The theory, applied to crime and delinquency, proposes that social behavior is learned. To understand why and how people commit crimes, psychologists and sociologists often study, analyze, and develop explanations of why these behaviors exist. Cognitive theory is one of many psychological theories of criminal behavior. Cognitive theories of crime explain criminal behavior as a defect in moral thinking, thought processes, and mental development. Cognitive theories focus on how we perceive the world around us, how we think, and the factors that influence our mental development (family upbringing, parental modeling, personality, intelligence). These theories help to explain how we develop morally in our thought process. Cognitive theories also help us to understand how an individual's personality and intelligence level are linked to delinquency.
Theoretical framework : theory of cognitive development
Jean Piaget: Moral and intellectual development. People construct a mental model of the world from childhood. Thus, from birth onward an individual will continue to develop. It is a process which occurs due to biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
Bandura maintains that individuals are not born with an innate ability to act violently. He suggested that, in contrast, violence and aggression are learned through a process of behavior modeling (Bandura, 1977). In other words, children learn violence through the observation of others. Aggressive acts are modeled after three primary sources: (1) family interaction, (2) environmental experiences, and (3) the mass media.
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927–1987), who applied the concept of moral development to criminological theory. Kohlberg (1984) believed that individuals pass through stages of moral development. Most important to his theory is the notion that there are levels, stages, and social orientation. The three levels are Level I, preconventional; Level II, conventional; and Level III, postconventional. With respect to the different stages, Stages 1 and 2 fall under Level I. Stages 3 and 4 fall under Level II, and Stages 5 and 6 fall under Level III.
The next subdiscipline is the information-processing branch. This area is predicated on the no ...
Research questionsIt was not known how criminal offenders percei.docxgholly1
Research questions
It was not known how criminal offenders perceive and mentally represent the world around them
It was not known what role perception plays in an individual’s potential to commit crime
The basis of Cognitive theory
Cognitive is defined as an ability to process information: Cognition has to do with one's ability to learn information quickly, memorize, and understand information they receive. Therefore, cognitive theories of crime fall under the psychological theories of criminal behavior. It's important to know that there are different theories that attempt to explain acts of criminal behavior.
Cognitive-behavioral theory combines the principles of social and developmental psychology and those of experimental-clinical psychology. The theory, applied to crime and delinquency, proposes that social behavior is learned. To understand why and how people commit crimes, psychologists and sociologists often study, analyze, and develop explanations of why these behaviors exist. Cognitive theory is one of many psychological theories of criminal behavior. Cognitive theories of crime explain criminal behavior as a defect in moral thinking, thought processes, and mental development. Cognitive theories focus on how we perceive the world around us, how we think, and the factors that influence our mental development (family upbringing, parental modeling, personality, intelligence). These theories help to explain how we develop morally in our thought process. Cognitive theories also help us to understand how an individual's personality and intelligence level are linked to delinquency.
Theoretical framework : theory of cognitive development
Jean Piaget: Moral and intellectual development. People construct a mental model of the world from childhood. Thus, from birth onward an individual will continue to develop. It is a process which occurs due to biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
Bandura maintains that individuals are not born with an innate ability to act violently. He suggested that, in contrast, violence and aggression are learned through a process of behavior modeling (Bandura, 1977). In other words, children learn violence through the observation of others. Aggressive acts are modeled after three primary sources: (1) family interaction, (2) environmental experiences, and (3) the mass media.
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927–1987), who applied the concept of moral development to criminological theory. Kohlberg (1984) believed that individuals pass through stages of moral development. Most important to his theory is the notion that there are levels, stages, and social orientation. The three levels are Level I, preconventional; Level II, conventional; and Level III, postconventional. With respect to the different stages, Stages 1 and 2 fall under Level I. Stages 3 and 4 fall under Level II, and Stages 5 and 6 fall under Level III.
The next subdiscipline is the information-processing branch. This area is predicated on the no.
Criminological Research Essay
Criminology
Criminology Essay
Essay about Criminological Theories
criminology Essay
My Dream Career As A Criminologist
Relationship Between Crime And Criminology
Conflict Criminology
Criminology: The Evolution of Crime Essay
Criminology Career Paper
Classical Criminology Essay
Importance Of Criminology In Modern Society
Criminology And Sociology And Criminology
Essay on Criminology in the Future
Criminology : Types Of Criminal Personality
Essay On Criminology And Criminal Justice
Essay on Feminist Criminology
Classical Theory of Criminology Essay
Pursuing A Degree In Criminology Essay
Essay on Criminology
What we see may not always be the reality and what we
presume as real may not be our observation always. In a democratic
set-up, this has often emerged as a reality. Democracies had always been subjected to criticism but it is astonishing to note how the
interplay of corrupt vision and changing social attitudes playing a
havoc in our democratic systems. This paper broadly investigates
the voting behavior and attitudes in response to sophisticated
tempting actions by political parties to pull voters. This research
demonstrates that higher the level of temptation combined with
many socio-economic perils leads to higher biasness towards
them. Participatory research, interviews, journals, publications,
and observation and media reporting have been studied, analyzed,
and scrutinized to discover how different poor and illiterate people
vote. Findings and results attribute a greater role of education,
financial liberty, backwardness, and awareness to political reality
in determining voting behavior.
Discussion 1In Chapter 7 of Crime Prevention, Robinson states th.docxduketjoy27252
Discussion 1
In Chapter 7 of Crime Prevention, Robinson states that "Rational choice and deterrence theories are two related theories that help understand why criminal justice – including crime control and crime prevention activities of police, courts, and corrections – should help us reduce crime in society" (2012). Answer one of the following questions:
THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE ABOVE. THE NEXT ASSIGNMENT YOU NEED TO DO IS PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON TWO CLASSMATES POSTS. THE LENGTH MUST BE 200 WORDS EACH POST. THERE ARE TWO FEEDBACKS YOU MUST DO. MUST BE POSITIVE FEEDBACK, PROPER GRAMMAR/SENTENCE STRUCTURE, AND ANY OUTSIDE SOURCES YOU USE THAT RELATES TO THE FEEBACK FROM THE STUDENT MUST BE PROPERLY CITED/SCHOLARY SOURCE.
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.
Robinson discusses many theories in Chapters 3 through 7. Some of these theories are: Biological Theories, Psychological Theories, Integrated Theories, Social Learning Theories, Social Control Theories, Routine Activity Theories, Crime Pattern Theories, Anomie Theories, Strain Theories, Institutional Anomie Theories, Contextual anomie and strain theories, Cultural deviance or subcultural theories.
Select a theory other than rational choice or deterrence theories, and compare and/or contrast it to the post of your classmates’ and/or your instructor.
Does one of these theories clarify your understanding of the crime or criminal issue you intend to examine in your Final Project?
DISCUSSION RESPONSE FROM STUDENT ONE JAYMES W.
Rational choice theories are among the fastest growing theories in social science today. Many sociologists and political scientists defend the claim that rational choice theory can provide the basis for a unified and comprehensive theory of social behavior. What distinguishes rational choice theory from other forms of theory is that it denies the existence of any kinds of action other than the purely rational and calculative. All social action can be seen as rationally motivated, as instrumental action, however much of it may appear to be irrational or non-rational.
General deterrence strategies focus on future behaviors, preventing individuals from engaging in crime or deviant by impacting their rational decision making process. Specific deterrence focuses on punishing known deviants in order to prevent them from ever again violating the specific norms they have broken. Through the rational use of punishment as a negative sanction, problematic behavior can be cut down dramatically. Some examples are: shock sentencing, corporal punishment, mandatory arrests for certain behaviors.
Specific deterrence strategies, focuses on punishing known deviants in order to prevent them from ever again violating the specific norms they have broken. The concern here is that motives and rationales that lie behind the original behavior can, perhaps, never be delineated, but through the rational use of punishment as a negative sanction, problematic beh.
Similar to SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource (20)
1. A2 Unit 4 practice exam questions.
Section 1 – Crime and Deviance (21 marks)
1. Assess the view that crime is the product of labelling processes.
2. Assess the view that crime is inevitable because capitalism is criminogenic.
3. Assess the value of the right realist approach to crime and deviance.
4. Assess the value of the chivalry thesis in understanding gender differences in crime.
5. Assess some of the reasons for difference in ethnicity and crime rates.
6. Assess some of the reasons for differences in class and crime rates.
7. Assess the view that the media stimulate moral panics and create folk devils.
8. Examine some of the relationships between crime and globalisation.
9. Assess sociological views of crime reduction strategies.
10. Assess the usefulness of different sociological approaches to suicide.
11. Assess different sociological approaches to social control.
12. Examine some of the reasons for the existence of deviant subcultures.
13. Assess the view that gender is the best predictor of criminality.
14. Assess the usefulness of official crime statistics for an understanding of patterns of crime.
Section 2 – Crime in the context of research methods (15 marks)
1. Assess the strengths and limitations of using official statistics for the study of ethnic groups
and crime.
2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of using experiments to investigate power and
authority in prisons.
3. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of using questionnaires to investigate violent crime.
4. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of using structured interviews to investigate the real
rate of street crime.
5. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of using observation to investigate the judicial process.
6. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of using public and personal documents to investigate
corporate crime.
7. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of using participant observation to investigate gang
culture.
8. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of using structured interviews to investigate suicide.
Section 3 – Theory and Methods (33 marks)
1. Assess the usefulness of functionalist theory to an understanding of society as a functional
unit.
2. Marxism is no longer relevant to an understanding of contemporary society. To what extent
do sociological arguments and evidence support this view?
3. Assess the usefulness of feminism and feminist research to an understanding of society.
4. Assess the usefulness of microsociology to our understanding of society.
5. Assess the extent to which the structure / agency debate has been resolved.
6. Assess the extent to which theories of modernity are relevant to understanding
contemporary society.
2. 7. Assess the extent to which sociological arguments and evidence support the view that
society has entered a stage of postmodernity.
8. Assess the extent to which positivism can be seen as a useful theory of methodology in
sociological research.
9. Alternative theories of methodology are far more useful for gaining an understanding of
society today than those used by positivists. To what extent do sociological arguments and
evidence support this view of sociological research?
10. Sociology is not very useful in informing social policy. To what extent do sociological
arguments and evidence support this claim?
11. Assess the view that survey-based research does not produce a valid picture of social
behaviour.
12. Assess the view that qualitative data is the most valid and reliable type of data.
13. Assess the practical, ethical and theoretical factors that sociologists face in conducting
research.
14. Sociology can be like the natural sciences. To what extent do sociological arguments and
evidence support this view?
15. Assess the extent to which sociology can be value-free and objective.
16. “Sociology cannot and should not be a science.” To what extent do sociological arguments
and evidence support this view?