Self-Assessment Tests (FROM TOPIC 2THAT I TOOK) THIS IS FYI WHEN YOU GET TO PART 2 OF THE ASSIGMENT This week I took the following self-assessments tests which caused me to reflect on myself. I took: 1. Emotional Intelligence Assessment: Emotional Intelligence 2. Personality Assessment: Personality Traits Learning Styles Assessments: The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?  3. Values Assessment: Values Profile:  Values Assessment: Rokeach Values Survey:   Diversity Assessment: Cultural Competence Self-Test:  4. Values Assessment: Values Profile 5. Values Assessment: Rokeach Values Survey I was pleased with my emotional IQ assessment results, the results that I received were that I was the type of person that could face obstacles and still stay focused. Although I may face obstacles I can stay focused and complete whatever I am assigned to do even when it is tough. I am the type of person that will try to focus on the big picture and I am always thinking of others and what I can do to make things better. My results were not surprising to me because I have mostly worked in leadership roles where I had to train, motivate, and encourage others to do their job. What this test result did for me was to push me to be better a leader, a conscious leader. The personality assessment showed that I was more of an introvert than an extrovert. Although I love being with people, I enjoy spending most of my quality time with close family and friends instead of large groups. I also like my quiet time and can get more done when it is quiet. The results from The VARK learning styles showed that I use different strategies or materials to learn something. I agree with that assessment because I have experienced this in my own personal life. Some things I may have catch on quicker to by reading whereas in learning something else I may be a hands-on person or a person that must watch it and then do it. What I learned is that people learn in different ways and there is nothing wrong with that. When I train people for a job, I go by how they learn and not just by how I learned it. I teach them differently, depending on the persons need, I am very open to change and doing things another way. The personal values test showed that I am loyal, caring, compassionate, and trustworthy. I believe that these are true about myself and they would represent the type of leader that I am. RUBRIC Top of Form Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 75.0 %Content 10.0 %Evaluation of Power Bases Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is pro.

1. Self-Assessment Tests (FROM TOPIC 2THAT I TOOK) THIS
IS FYI WHEN YOU GET TO PART 2 OF THE ASSIGMENT
This week I took the following self-assessments tests which
caused me to reflect on myself. I took:
1. Emotional Intelligence Assessment: Emotional Intelligence
2. Personality Assessment: Personality Traits Learning Styles
Assessments: The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?
3. Values Assessment: Values Profile: Values Assessment:
Rokeach Values Survey: Diversity Assessment: Cultural
Competence Self-Test:
4. Values Assessment: Values Profile
5. Values Assessment: Rokeach Values Survey
I was pleased with my emotional IQ assessment results, the
results that I received were that I was the type of person that
could face obstacles and still stay focused. Although I may face
obstacles I can stay focused and complete whatever I am
assigned to do even when it is tough. I am the type of person
that will try to focus on the big picture and I am always
thinking of others and what I can do to make things better. My
results were not surprising to me because I have mostly worked
in leadership roles where I had to train, motivate, and encourage
others to do their job. What this test result did for me was to
push me to be better a leader, a conscious leader. The
personality assessment showed that I was more of an introvert
than an extrovert. Although I love being with people, I enjoy
spending most of my quality time with close family and friends
instead of large groups. I also like my quiet time and can get
more done when it is quiet. The results from The VARK
learning styles showed that I use different strategies or
materials to learn something. I agree with that assessment
because I have experienced this in my own personal life. Some
things I may have catch on quicker to by reading whereas in
learning something else I may be a hands-on person or a person
that must watch it and then do it. What I learned is that people

2. learn in different ways and there is nothing wrong with that.
When I train people for a job, I go by how they learn and not
just by how I learned it. I teach them differently, depending on
the persons need, I am very open to change and doing things
another way. The personal values test showed that I am loyal,
caring, compassionate, and trustworthy. I believe that these are
true about myself and they would represent the type of leader
that I am.
RUBRIC
Top of Form
Evaluation and Leadership Philosophy
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
10.0 %Evaluation of Power Bases
Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a
current ethics-related issue is absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a

3. current ethics-related issue is weak or marginal with gaps in
presentation.
Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a
current ethics-related issue is provided, but at a cursory level.
Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a
current ethics-related issue is clear and integrated.
Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a
current ethics-related issue is thorough and well integrated.
10.0 %Evaluation of Influence Tactics
Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is weak or
marginal with gaps in presentation.
Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is provided,
but at a cursory level.
Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is clear and
integrated.
Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is thorough
and well integrated.
10.0 %Evaluation of Leadership Style
Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the
leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the
leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is weak or
marginal with gaps in presentation.
Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the
leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is provided,
but at a cursory level.
Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the
leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is clear and
integrated.
Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the
leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is thorough

4. and well integrated.
10.0 %Evaluation of Outcome
Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation
is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation
is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.
Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation
is provided, but at a cursory level. There is some explanation to
show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes.
Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation
is clear and integrated. There is a complete explanation to show
the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes.
Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation
is thorough and well integrated. There is detailed evidence to
show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes.
10.0 %Servant Leadership Discussion
A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be
different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and
leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal
values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be
different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and
leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal
values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is weak or
marginal with gaps in presentation.
A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be
different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and
leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal
values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is provided, but
at a cursory level.
A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be
different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and
leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal

5. values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is clear and
integrated.
A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be
different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and
leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal
values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is thorough and
well integrated.
25.0 %Leadership Philosophy Statement
There is no leadership philosophy statement included.
The leadership philosophy statement is included, but lacks
details or is incomplete.
The leadership philosophy statement includes personal views,
past experiences, expectations of self and others, and a personal
leadership style, but requires further details.
The detailed leadership philosophy statement incorporates all
required elements. There is an explanation of how the student
views own leadership style, how others view the leadership
style of the student, and how this contributes to the success of
an organization.
The detailed leadership philosophy statement incorporates all
required elements and specific leadership examples. There is a
clear explanation of how the student views own leadership
style, how other view the leadership style of the student, and
how this contributes to the success of an organization.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development
of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments

6. and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the
paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the
purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim
in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or
sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice
are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure
and audience-appropriate language are employed.

7. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors
in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting
errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

8. Bottom of Form
Due Date: Jan 17, 2017
Details & INSTRUCTIONS:
In earlier topics, you explored the tenet of conscious leadership
and the influence of self-awareness on your leadership style.
You established that a clear understanding of your abilities,
motivation, and goals provides a firm foundation for leading
others. Leadership studies demonstrate that the most effective
leaders know how to draw upon self-leadership skills to in turn
motivate and lead others to expand their strengths to ultimately
better serve the goals of an organization. For this assignment,
you will continue to study conscious leadership and look at a
leadership example from contemporary media and evaluate how
well the particular leader exemplifies the qualities of effective
and ethical conscious leadership. Then, you will compose your
own leadership philosophy statement to articulate the qualities
that will make you an effective conscious leader of people and
organizations.
Part 1:
For Part 1, select a relevant and topical leadership issue from
current news media that revolves around ethics and ethical
decision making. Topics must be approved by your instructor.
Once approved, research the situation and gather data in order
to evaluate the dynamics of the situation. Write an evaluation
(500-750 words) of the situation that addresses the following:
1. The power bases used by the leader.
2. The influence tactics used by the leader.

9. 3. The leadership style of the leader.
4. The outcome (or potential outcome) of the situation.
Conclude by justifying whether or not you think this leader
supports the values of conscious capitalism. Is the leader's
leadership style effective? Do you believe the leader acted
ethically in the situation? Be sure to consider each tenet of
conscious capitalism in your leader evaluation.
Next, imagine yourself as a practitioner of servant leadership.
You have been appointed into the leadership role in this same
circumstance. Explain how the situation would be different.
Address the four criteria listed above in your discussion and
incorporate the principles of conscious capitalism by explaining
how your personal values and style are influenced by each tenet.
Part 2:
For Part 2, develop a leadership philosophy statement as an
appendix to your evaluation in Part 1. Begin by reviewing your
self-assessment results from Topic 2 and reflecting on what you
have learned about effective leadership and conscious
capitalism in the course. Keep in mind that one's leadership
philosophy is a unique statement that encapsulates your own
view of leadership, so the final product may vary, but your
statement should incorporate the following:
1. Personal values and beliefs that influence your leadership
style.
2. Past experiences or people that have influenced the
development of those values.
3. Expectations of self and others.
4. Leadership style and influence tactics.
Your goal is to create a distinctive statement (250-500 words)
that incorporates the elements outlined above. The end product
should clearly articulate how you view yourself as a leader and
how others would view you as a leader. It should also make
clear how you can contribute to the success of other people and
an organization as a whole.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An

10. abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. MUST
BE PLAGIARISAM FREE