The document outlines a case analysis framework, prompting the identification of issues, key facts, assumptions, influential parties, and analytical tools. It also requires the formulation of three alternatives to the current situation, including the pros and cons of each alternative. Finally, it asks for a recommendation of the best alternative with a detailed justification.

1. Issues: Identify at least seven issues you see in the case
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
What is the Key issue you see in the case:
__________________________
What facts pertain to the case: Identify at least three important
facts that pertain to the case
1.
2.
3.
4.

2. 5.
What assumptions do you plan to make in your analysis: None
is an acceptable answer
1.
2.
3
What people and organizations may have an impact on the case:
There should be at least five.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
You are writing the case from the perspective of which person
or organization:______________

3. What tools of Analysis would you use in this case: You only
need to identify them and explain what information each will
give you that you feel is important.
Based upon the above information – provide three alternatives
Alternative 1 is the Status Quo or to do nothing different that
the current situation.
Identify at least three arguments in favor and three against this
approach
Pros
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cons
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

4. Alternative 2
____________________________________________________
Identify at least three arguments in favor and three against this
approach
Pros
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cons
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Alternative 3
______________________________________________
Identify at least three arguments in favor and three against this
approach

5. Pros
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cons
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Given the information above select your recommended
alternative and explain why you feel it is the best alternative:
This should take three to five paragraphs and be based upon the
information presented in your case.