This document outlines the quality assurance process of self-assessment reports (SARs) at Government College University Faisalabad. It discusses that SARs involve systematically gathering and reviewing quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate educational programs and improve student learning. The objectives of SARs are to maintain academic standards, enhance student learning, verify programs meet objectives, and provide feedback for quality assurance. SARs are assessed based on 8 criteria involving aspects like curriculum, facilities, faculty, and support. Each criteria has 3-10 standards programs are evaluated against. Forms related to the SAR process are available online.
After completion of the training workshop, the participants will be able to know:
- Introduction regarding the Self-Assessment Report (SAR)
- Governance
- Curriculum Design & Review
- Teaching Learning and Assessment
- Student Entry Qualifications, Admission Procedure, Progress
and Achievements
- Physical facilities
- Student Support Services
- Research and Extension
- Staff and Facilities: Recruitment and staff development
- Process Management and Continuous Improvement
- SWOT Analysis
- Conclusion & Recommendation
Introduction
Governance
Curriculum Design & Review
Teaching Learning and Assessment
Student Entry Qualifications, Admission Procedure, Progress And Achievements
Physical facilities
Student Support Services
Research and Extension
Staff and Facilities: Recruitment and staff development
Process Management and Continuous Improvement
SWOT Analysis
Conclusion & Recommendation
After completion of the training workshop, the participants will be able to know:
- Introduction regarding the Self-Assessment Report (SAR)
- Governance
- Curriculum Design & Review
- Teaching Learning and Assessment
- Student Entry Qualifications, Admission Procedure, Progress
and Achievements
- Physical facilities
- Student Support Services
- Research and Extension
- Staff and Facilities: Recruitment and staff development
- Process Management and Continuous Improvement
- SWOT Analysis
- Conclusion & Recommendation
Introduction
Governance
Curriculum Design & Review
Teaching Learning and Assessment
Student Entry Qualifications, Admission Procedure, Progress And Achievements
Physical facilities
Student Support Services
Research and Extension
Staff and Facilities: Recruitment and staff development
Process Management and Continuous Improvement
SWOT Analysis
Conclusion & Recommendation
SAILing Takes You to Where Your Course Ought to Be - Course Technology Comput...Cengage Learning
SAILing Takes You to Where Your Course Ought to Be - Course Technology Computing Conference
Presenter: Kelly Hinson and Angie Rudd, Gaston College
Strengthening Academic Internet Learning (SAIL) is Gaston College's online quality enhancement project (QEP). This initiative has been in place for 4 years, and places an increased effort on online course quality and a comprehensive online student support system to improve student learning in online courses. The SAIL initiative is an ongoing adaptive environment. In this session, Angie and Kelly will share the changes that have been made in the past year and why, along with the student feedback that promoted the direction of this initiative, and the reasoning behind the project and the standards put in place. Further goals for this session include: presenting a student perspective of the online environment, demonstrating the layout of our online courses in the Blackboard environment, and showing the current statistics of how these standards have improved student learning outcomes. Presenters Angie Rudd and Kelly Hinson have worked with the SAIL initiative since it was opened to instructors. Kelly has spent the summer redoing three courses using the updated SAIL standards. She and Angie work closely with the SAIL team to keep their courses at the highest standards. Both instructors are involved in online standards committees. In a lecture-based co-presentation, these two Gaston College instructors will show attendees how these SAIL standards are used to improve their online course quality. Examples will be presented from Introduction to Computers, Emerging Technologies and Management Information Systems courses. The main emphasis will be in the Introduction to Computers course. Statistics will be used to show the increase in student learning outcomes from the SAIL initiative. Attendees will take away the updated online course requirements for the QEP along with an understanding of what makes a great online course for students.
Applying NEASC Best Practices to Ensure the Quality of Online Programsmarando
Brandeis University’s Division of Graduate Professional Studies offers entire graduate certificate and degree programs via distance learning. This presentation illustrates how the Division recently applied NEASC Best Practices for Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs to self-assess and assure the quality of its online programs, resulting in a successful re-accreditation.
After completion of the presentation, the participants will be able to know:
- Quality has several definitions
- History of QA
- Functions of QA in Education
- QA Need and QA Model
- Definition of Accreditation
- Purpose of Quality Assurance and Accreditation
- The need for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in
Bangladesh
- Overview of QA and Aim and Objectives of IQAC
- Elements of the Quality Assurance process
- Setting Common Goals among faculty and administrators
- Quality Assurance Need
- Conclusion
How to create a course as a Project Brief on an E-Learning Project called Elevate -A foundational certification on
Project Management.Learn the method of breaking down a course structure and create a comprehensive format of delivery.
Using Nursing Exam Data Effectively in Preparing Nursing AccreditationExamSoft
Presented by Ainslie Nibert, Associate Dean/Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Texas Woman's University
Faculty facing either an initial nursing accreditation, or those preparing for a re-affirmation of accreditation visit, need to amass evidence demonstrating how the program is evaluated for achievement of program outcome using reliable and valid measurements. One of the most valuable resources of this evidence is a collection of student performance data from teacher-made and standardized exams used throughout the curriculum. How can faculty demonstrate that the exams they deliver to students are both reliable and valid? The purpose of this webinar is to discuss how faculty can incorporate assessment data and related analysis into their curriculum evaluation processes; establish that the teacher-made and standardized exams administered throughout the program are reliable and valid; and include assessment findings in the accreditation self-study that demonstrate compliance with nationally-recognized education standards in nursing.
SAILing Takes You to Where Your Course Ought to Be - Course Technology Comput...Cengage Learning
SAILing Takes You to Where Your Course Ought to Be - Course Technology Computing Conference
Presenter: Kelly Hinson and Angie Rudd, Gaston College
Strengthening Academic Internet Learning (SAIL) is Gaston College's online quality enhancement project (QEP). This initiative has been in place for 4 years, and places an increased effort on online course quality and a comprehensive online student support system to improve student learning in online courses. The SAIL initiative is an ongoing adaptive environment. In this session, Angie and Kelly will share the changes that have been made in the past year and why, along with the student feedback that promoted the direction of this initiative, and the reasoning behind the project and the standards put in place. Further goals for this session include: presenting a student perspective of the online environment, demonstrating the layout of our online courses in the Blackboard environment, and showing the current statistics of how these standards have improved student learning outcomes. Presenters Angie Rudd and Kelly Hinson have worked with the SAIL initiative since it was opened to instructors. Kelly has spent the summer redoing three courses using the updated SAIL standards. She and Angie work closely with the SAIL team to keep their courses at the highest standards. Both instructors are involved in online standards committees. In a lecture-based co-presentation, these two Gaston College instructors will show attendees how these SAIL standards are used to improve their online course quality. Examples will be presented from Introduction to Computers, Emerging Technologies and Management Information Systems courses. The main emphasis will be in the Introduction to Computers course. Statistics will be used to show the increase in student learning outcomes from the SAIL initiative. Attendees will take away the updated online course requirements for the QEP along with an understanding of what makes a great online course for students.
Applying NEASC Best Practices to Ensure the Quality of Online Programsmarando
Brandeis University’s Division of Graduate Professional Studies offers entire graduate certificate and degree programs via distance learning. This presentation illustrates how the Division recently applied NEASC Best Practices for Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs to self-assess and assure the quality of its online programs, resulting in a successful re-accreditation.
After completion of the presentation, the participants will be able to know:
- Quality has several definitions
- History of QA
- Functions of QA in Education
- QA Need and QA Model
- Definition of Accreditation
- Purpose of Quality Assurance and Accreditation
- The need for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in
Bangladesh
- Overview of QA and Aim and Objectives of IQAC
- Elements of the Quality Assurance process
- Setting Common Goals among faculty and administrators
- Quality Assurance Need
- Conclusion
How to create a course as a Project Brief on an E-Learning Project called Elevate -A foundational certification on
Project Management.Learn the method of breaking down a course structure and create a comprehensive format of delivery.
Using Nursing Exam Data Effectively in Preparing Nursing AccreditationExamSoft
Presented by Ainslie Nibert, Associate Dean/Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Texas Woman's University
Faculty facing either an initial nursing accreditation, or those preparing for a re-affirmation of accreditation visit, need to amass evidence demonstrating how the program is evaluated for achievement of program outcome using reliable and valid measurements. One of the most valuable resources of this evidence is a collection of student performance data from teacher-made and standardized exams used throughout the curriculum. How can faculty demonstrate that the exams they deliver to students are both reliable and valid? The purpose of this webinar is to discuss how faculty can incorporate assessment data and related analysis into their curriculum evaluation processes; establish that the teacher-made and standardized exams administered throughout the program are reliable and valid; and include assessment findings in the accreditation self-study that demonstrate compliance with nationally-recognized education standards in nursing.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT.pptx
1. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SELF
ASSESSMENT REPORTS(SARs)
Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC)
Government College University Faisalabad
2.
3. ASSESSMENT
Assessment is a systematic process of gathering, reviewing,
and using important quantitative and qualitative data and
information from multiple and diverse sources about
educational programs, for the purpose of
• Improving student learning, and
•Evaluating whether academic and learning
standards are being met.
4. SELF ASSESSMENT
Self-assessment is an assessment conducted by
the institution to assess whether programs meet
their educational objectives and outcomes to
improve program quality and enhance student
learning.
5. OBJECTIVES OF
SELF-ASSESSMENT
Maintain and Improve academic standards
Enhance students’ learning
Verify that the existing programs meet their objectives
and Institutional goals
Provide feedback for quality assurance of academic
programs
Prepare the academic program for review by BOS and the
BOF
6. CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
1.Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes (4 standards)
2.Curriculum Design and Organization (7 standards)
3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities (3 standards)
4.Student Support and guidance (3 standards)
5.Process Control (5 standards)
6.Faculty (3 standards)
7.Institutional Facilities (3 standards)
8.Institutional Support (3 standards)
7. Criterion 1: Program Mission, Objectives and
Outcomes
Standard 1.1: The program must have documented measurable objectives
that support Faculty and Institution mission statements.
Standard 1.2: The program must have documented outcomes for graduating
students. It must be demonstrated that the outcomes support the program
objectives and that graduating students are capable of performing these
outcomes.
Standard 1.3: The results of program’s assessment and the extent to which they
are used to improve the program must be documented.
Standard 1.4: The department must assess its overall performance
periodically using quantifiable measures.
8. Criterion 2: Curriculum Design and Organization
Standard 2.1: The curriculum must be consistent and supports the program's
documented objectives.
Standard 2.2: Theoretical background, problems analysis and solution design
must be stressed within the program’s core material.
Standard 2.3: The curriculum must satisfy the core requirements for the
program, as specified by the respective accreditation body.
Standard 2.4: The curriculum must satisfy the major requirements for the
program as specified by the respective accreditation body.
Standards 2.5: The curriculum must satisfy general education, arts and
professional and other discipline requirements for the program, as specified by
the respective accreditation body.
Standard 2.6: Information technology component of the curriculum must be
integrated throughout the program.
Standard 2.7: Oral and written communication skills of the student must be
developed and applied in the program.
9. Criterion 3: Laboratories and Computing Facilities
Standard 3.1: Laboratory manuals/ documentation/ instructions for experiments
must be available and readily accessible to faculty and students.
Standard 3.2: There must be adequate support personnel for assistance and
maintaining the laboratories.
Standard 3.3: The University/College computing infrastructure and facilities must
be adequate to support program’s objectives.
10. Criterion 4: Student Support and Advising
Standard 4.1: Courses must be offered with sufficient frequency and number
for students to complete the program in a timely manner.
Standard 4.2: Courses in the major must be structured to ensure effective
interaction between students, faculty and teaching assistants.
Standard 4.3: Guidance on how to complete the program must be available to
all the students and access to qualified counseling must be available to make
course decisions and career choices.
11. Criterion 5: Process Control
Standard 5.1: The process by which students are admitted to the program must be based
on quantitative and qualitative criteria and clearly documented. This process must be
periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting its objectives.
Standard 5.2: The process by which students are registered in the program and monitoring
of students progress to ensure timely completion of the program must be documented. This
process must be periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting its objectives.
Standard 5.3: The process of recruiting and retaining highly qualified faculty members
must be placed and clearly documented. Also processes and procedures for faculty
evaluation, promotion must be consistent with institution mission statement. These processes
must be periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting with its objectives.
Standard 5.4: The process and procedures used to ensure that teaching and delivery of
course material to the students emphasizes active learning and that course learning
outcomes are met. The process must be periodically evaluated.
Standard 5.5: The process that ensures that graduated have completed the requirements of
the program must be based on standards, effective and clearly documented procedures.
This process must be periodically evaluated to ensure that it is meeting its objectives.
12. Criterion 6: Faculty
Standard 6.1: There must be enough full time faculty who are committed to
the program to provide adequate coverage of the program areas/courses with
continuity and stability. The interests and qualifications of all faculty members
must be sufficient to teach all courses, plan, modify and update courses and
curricula. All faculty members must have a level of competence that would
normally be obtained through graduate work in the discipline. The majority of the
faculty must hold a Ph.D. in the discipline.
Standard 6.2: All the faculty members must retain current in the discipline and
sufficient time must be provided for scholarly activities and professional
development. Also, effective programs for faculty development must be in place.
Standard 6.3: All faculty members should be motivated and have job
satisfaction to excel in their profession.
13. Criterion 7: Institutional Facilities
Standard 7.1: The institute must have the infrastructure to support new
trends in learning such as e-learning.
Standard 7.2: The library must possess an up-to-date technical collection
relevant to the program and must be adequately staffed with professional
personnel.
Standard 7.3: Classrooms must be adequately equipped and offices must be
adequate to enable faculty to carry out their responsibilities.
14. Criterion 8: Institutional Support
Standard 8.1: There must be sufficient support and financial resources to
attract and retain high quality faculty and provide the means for them to
maintain competence as teachers and scholars.
Standard 8.2: There must be an adequate number of high quality graduate
students, research assistants and Ph.D. students.
Standard 8.3: Financial resources must be provided to acquire and maintain
Library holdings, laboratories and computing facilities.
15.
16. Forms Related to SAR
All (10) forms related to SAR are available on the following link
https://qec.gcuf.edu.pk/sar-survey-performas/