Institution evaluation

1. INSTITUTIONAL
EVALUATION
PROCESESS
MARIA WILMA A. MARISCAL

2. 5.0 CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION IN
INSTITUTIONAL
ACCREDITATION
There is no single model of what constitutes
an accredited university or college. But it is
possible to identify certain defining
characteristics, which are globally
accepted. Some of these are:
fostering and supporting scholarly activity
and creative research
regard of accountability to the stakeholders
on the integrity of its scholarship
maintenance of academic standard
impartiality of its judgments
effectiveness of its systems
competence of its graduates.

3. 5.0 CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION IN
INSTITUTIONAL
ACCREDITATION
Specifically, an accredited university or college
should be able to demonstrate active
commitment to and achievement in:
the creation, transmission and conversation of
knowledge;
the development of constantly high level of
knowledge and in appropriate fields of expert
knowledge, skills and understanding among
students and faculty.

4. The exchange of knowledge across
disciplines and geographic
boundaries;
An ethos of critical and self-centered
inquiry in all areas of activity;
A conscious professional approval to
research and the facilitation of
learning;
Recognition by academic peers and
other appropriate organizations of the
academic standards of its research
activities, degrees and other awards
and programs of study;
5.0 CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION IN
INSTITUTIONAL
ACCREDITATION

5. Substantial participation by and recognition of
its faculty and other personnel in national and
international scholarly activities, including those
along pure and applied research and
scholarship, pedagogical developments and
research consultancy;
Regular dialogues on its performance with
students, employees and other stakeholders;
The contribution of expertise to broader local,
national or international affairs;
Continual improvement of its ways of doing
things
5.0 CRITERIA FOR
EVALUATION IN
INSTITUTIONAL
ACCREDITATION

6. 8 Criteria identified in the
AACCUP accreditation system
1. Governance and Management
2. Teaching and Learning
3. Faculty
4. Research
5. Extension, Consultancy and
Linkages
6. Support to Students
7. Management of Resources
8. Generation, Management and
Utilization of Financial Resources

7. PRE VISIT PROCESS
Prepare - “University Portfolio
Report” (UPR).
Supporting documents that
may be needed by review
panel are placed in the room
set aside for them.
Each standard will be its own
chapter in the UPR.

8. “UNIVERSITY PORTFOLIO REPORT” (UPR)

9. DOCUMENTS FOR THE APPLICATION
FOR CERTIFICATE OF PROGRAM
COMPLIANCE (COPC) BACHELOR OF
SECONDARY EDUCATION
 Department Head’s Credentials
 List of Faculty Members with their qualification
 BSED Faculty Members’ Credentials (TOR, PDS, PRC
ID)
 Memorandum of Understanding
 Faculty Development and its supporting documents
 Approved Curriculum
 Approved Personnel Schedule
 Credentials of the College Library Consultant
 Library Holdings Evidences.
 Picture of the College Library
 Picture of School Facilities and MOA with Naga College
Foundation

10. DOCUMENTS FOR THE APPLICATION FOR
CERTIFICATE OF PROGRAM COMPLIANCE
(COPC) BACHELOR OF SECONDARY
EDUCATION
 MOA with Department of Education-
Camarines Sur
 Picture of the Student Handbook and
Resolution Approving the Student Handbook
 Entrance Examination
 Enrolment Data from the Office of the
College Registrar
 LET Performance Evidences
 Outcome-Based Syllabi

11. Final Evaluation
 Accreditor shall look for evidence to
validate the claims in the Self-survey
Report and the Institutional
Performance
5.1 Criterion 1:
GOVERNANCE AND
MANAGEMENT
The Institution adopts a sufficient system
of governance and management to
conduct existing operations, and
management to conduct existing operations,
and has the ability to respond to development
and change.

12. INDICATORS: GOVERNANCE
AND MANAGEMENT
1. The management is guided by a well-
defined institutional vision and mission,
which are in consonance with national
goals and objectives.
2. The governance of the institution is clearly
manifested in its organizational structure.
3. The powers, functions, duties and
responsibilities of key officials are clearly
delineated.
4. The policy-making body demonstrates
strong leadership and support to the
institution’s program and operations.

13. INDICATORS: GOVERNANCE
AND MANAGEMENT
5. Policies and systems are well disseminated, implemented
and monitored to ensure cooperation and involvement of
implementors towards leading the institution to global
competitiveness.
6. Academic and administrative committees/bodies exist to
assist in decision-making affecting academic matters
7. Programs, and projects geared towards achieving the
institution’s vision and mission are clearly planned,
implemented and continuously improved.
8. The institution implements, and periodically evaluates its
institutional development plan
9. There is demonstrable information to indicate continued
stability and confidence on the Institution in its governance,
financial control and quality assurance management
systems.

14. 5.2 Criterion 2: TEACHING AND LEARNING
The Institution has a clearly defined mission and academic
programs, with set goals, objectives and learning outcomes at
appropriate levels. It should also possess effective mechanisms
of delivery and evaluation to ensure success in meeting these
objectives and to enable students to achieve intended
outcomes.
INDICATORS:
1. The curricular programs are consistent with the institution’s
mission, and also with local and national development goals.
2. The Institution’s curricular programs meet prescribed standards
and are supported with appropriate and updated learning
processes and resources.
3. Periodic review, monitoring, and evaluation of curricular
programs by stakeholders are conducted to respond to recent
trends and development.

15. 4. The institution adopts and implement a continuing faculty
development program.
5. There is an effective procedure of recruitment of the best and
most qualified faculty.
6. The institution maintains an attractive system of compensation,
incentives and rewards for the faculty.
7. There is an effective and periodic faculty performance evaluation
system.
8. The Institution adopts a mechanism for continuous improvement
in the delivery of academic programs.
9. The institution is recognized in the regional and national levels for
the performance of its graduates in the board, bar and other
national examination for professionals.
10. The curricular programs gain acceptance and
recognition in the local, regional, national and
international level for producing quality and
employable graduates.

16. 5.3 Criterion 3: FACULTY
The standard of the institution is
measured to a great extent by the
qualification and performance of its
faculty. It maintains highly qualified
members in terms of their academic
qualifications, experiences and
professional competence.
INDICATORS :
1. The faculty have adequate academic preparation and
experiences relevant to the courses they are assigned
to teach.
2. There is an adequate number of faculty with appropriate
qualifications to handle the courses offered.
3. Teaching load allows time to perform academic –related
activities like consultancy, research, extension,
production and publication and publication of scholarly
works, etc.

17. INDICATORS : FACULTY
4. The institution adopts and implement a
continuing faculty development
program.
5. There is an effective procedure of
recruitment of the best and most
qualified faculty.
6. The institution maintains an attractive
system of compensation, incentives
and rewards for the faculty.
7. There is an effective and periodic
faculty performance evaluation system.

18. 5.4 Criterion 4: RESEARCH
The institution maintains an
environment of fostering creative and
scientific research that produces
scholarly outputs and appropriate
technologies.

19. INDICATORS: RESEARCH
1. The Institution has a research agenda/program
which is a product of collaborative efforts among
its faculty members and students and is in
consonance with local, regional and national
research thrust and priorities.
2. Faculty members, staff and students participate
actively in the conduct and evaluation,
publication, and dissemination of research
outputs.
3. The institution has strong linkages with the local,
regional and national agencies (government and
private), in terms of technical and funding
support.

20. INDICATORS: RESEARCH
4. The Institution conducts group/joint researchers in
collaboration with other institutions to address
common regional or national concerns
5. The institution regularly publishes a research
journal.
6. The institution is recognized for its research
capability in the local, regional, national and
international levels.
7. A mechanism for promoting a culture of research
among its faculty, staff, and students is adopted.

21. 5.5 Criterion 5:
EXTENSION,CONSULTANCY
AND LINKAGES
The institution demonstrate the capability to
conduct extension programs that consider the
economic and development needs of the
country at the local, regional and national level
for people empowerment and self-reliance.
The institution is likewise valued as a
partner by other higher education institutions,
professional institutions, government
organizations and industries, within the
Philippine and the international community.

22. Indicators: EXTENSION,CONSULTANCY
AND LINKAGES
1. The institution has a well-defined extension
program based on community needs and has
capability to provide expertise in and the transfer
of technologies.
2. The faculty and assigned staff are involved in the
planning, conduct and evaluation of the activities
and projects in the implementation of the
extension program.
3. There is adequate funding and administrative
support for the continuity and sustainability of the
extension projects.
4. The institution has an organized pool of experts to
provide consultancy services along identified
areas of specialization and technologies.

23. Indicators: EXTENSION,CONSULTANCY
AND LINKAGES
5. The Institution maintains strong links
with industry, peer institutions, and
funding agencies to strengthen its
curricular offerings, forge mutuality
beneficial arrangements along
research, extension, faculty/students
exchange, etc.
6. It has effective links with local
government and community
organizations and these are used to
define priorities for the extension
program.

24. 5.6 Criterion 6: SUPPORT TO
STUDENTS
The institution demonstrates the
capability to provide resources and
services to support its students
throughout their academic life in order
that they may attain their maximum
potential and total development, thus
becoming worthy citizens of the country.

25. INDICATORS:
1. There is a well-organized, properly administered
and adequately staffed student service unit.
2. An admission and retention program and
procedure for the selection of prospective students
and retention of the most deserving is adopted.
3. The institution has a well-defined and sustainable
scholarship program and grants which enable
beneficiaries to complete their studies successfully
within the prescribed period.
4. There exists a functional guidance program
available to all students needing assistance and to
ensure that they gain maximum benefit from the
support they receive.

26. 5. A variety of curricular and extra-curricular
activities is provided to students in order
that they can attain their maximum
potential and development.
6. The Institution adequately provides a
variety of services to meet the health,
sports, spiritual, and socio-cultural needs of
its students.
7. An effective employment and placement
program is available.
8. Students are active participants in major
decision committees and policy-making
bodies particularly those affecting student
welfare development.

27. 5.7 Criterion 7: MANAGEMENT OF
RESOURCES
The institution provides an environment which is conducive to
effective teaching and learning and supports the educational
programs offered. The adequacy of financial resources,
physical plant and facilities, library, classrooms, shops,
laboratories, information technology, multi-media center and
general education laboratories is important.
INDICATORS: MANAGEMENT OF
RESOURCES
1. The institution makes effective use of information and
communication technology to support student learning and to
manage its academic and administrative programs.
2. There are adequate buildings and provisions for classrooms,
administrative and faculty offices, staff rooms, study areas,
clinics, student center, cafeteria, dormitories, etc, equipped
with the needed facilities.

28. INDICATORS: MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
3. The institution has a system for periodic
maintenance, repair and upkeep of its
buildings and facilities.
4. The library provides adequate, comfortable
and accessible space and facilities to serve
the academic community.
5. The library has varied, adequate and
updated collection to serve the needs of the
faculty and students.

29. INDICATORS: MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
6. Provisions for non-print, digital and
electronic resources are available.
7. There are adequate and properly
maintained laboratories and shops to
support the academic programs of the
institution.
8. The institution adopts a fair and objective
performance evaluation system for the
faculty and non-teaching personnel.

30. 5.8 Criterion 8: GENERATION, MANAGEMENT AND
UTILIZATION OF FINANCIAL INDICATORS:
MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
The institution has sufficient financial
resources to support the educational
programs and services. These are efficiently
managed and effectively utilized
INDICATORS:
1. The institution prepares and implements a financial
development plan approved by higher authorities.
2. The budget of the institution is well-prepared,
judiciously allocated, effectively utilized, clearly
accounted for and fairly audited.
3. The institution has a viable and sustainable income-
generating program/project to support its budget and
augment the regular budget allocation from the
government.

31. 4. There is a mechanism to ensure
proper financial management.
5. Strategies to secure additional financial
resources for its maintenance,
operations and development through
strong linkages with government and
non-government agencies in the
country and abroad are adopted.
6. Concerned officials, faculty, staff, and
students participate in the budget
preparation, allocation, management
and control.
7. A mechanism for effective monitoring
and evaluation of its income-generating
activities is in place.

32. References
 https://ntu.edu.pk/qec/wp-
content/uploads/2016/11/Institutional_
Performance_Evaluation.pdf

33. THANK
YOU!