SALES
ORGANISATION AND
STRUCTURE
GROUP 3
WHAT IS SALES
ORGANISATION?
• AN ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT WITHIN
LOGISTICS, THAT STRUCTURES THE
COMPANY ACCORDING TO ITS SALES
REQUIREMENTS.
• RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SALE AND
DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS AND SERVICES.
• DISTRIBUTION CHAINS WHICH DETERMINE THE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR A DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL
• 4 MOST COMMON SALES ORGANISATION STRUCTURES -
STRUCTURE
1. LINE ORGANISATION
2. LINE AND STAFF ORGANISATION
3. FUNCTIONAL ORGANISATION
4. HORIZONTAL ORGANISATION
1. LINE ORGANISATION
PROS
• SIMPLE ORGANIZATION, CLEAR
AUTHORITY, QUICK DECISIONS,
LOW COST
CONS
• NO SUPPORT TO LINE MANAGERS
FROM SUBORDINATES WHO HAVE
SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE /
SKILLS
• LESS TIME FOR PLANNING /
ANALYSIS
2. LINE AND STAFF ORGANISATION
PROS
• BETTER MARKETING DECISIONS,
SUPERIOR SALES PERFORMANCE
CONS
• HIGH COST AND COORDINATION,
SLOWER DECISION MAKING
• CONFLICT MAY ARISE IF STAFF
MANAGERS’ ROLE IS NOT CLEAR
3. FUNCTIONAL ORGANISATION
PROS
• QUALIFIED SPECIALISTS GUIDE
SALES FORCE, SIMPLE TO
ADMINISTER
CONS
• CONFUSION TO SALESPEOPLE
4. HORIZONTAL ORGANISATION
PROS
• REDUCTION IN SUPERVISION,
UNNECESSARY TASKS, & COST
• IMPROVED EFFICIENCY AND
CUSTOMER RESPONSES
CONS
• PRESSURE ON PLANNING TEAM
FOR COORDINATION
SPECIALISED
STRUCTURES
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION -
• PRODUCT AND SERVICE
• SALES FORCE ABILITIES
• DEMANDS OF SELLING
• CUSTOMERS AND MARKETS
SPECIALISED STRUCTURE
1. GEOGRAPHY / TERRITORY
2. PRODUCT / SERVICE LINE
3. CUSTOMER / ACCOUNT SIZE
4. INDUSTRY / VERTICAL SEGMENT
5. COMBINATION / HYBRID STRUCTURE
1. GEOGRAPHY / TERRITORY
PROS
• DEVELOP FAMILIARITY WITH A
SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
• BUILD RAPPORT WITH LOCAL
BUSINESSES, GET TO KNOW
REGIONAL COMPETITORS, AND
TRACK TARGET ACCOUNTS
CONS
• WORKING IN SILOS, INHIBITING
THEIR ABILITY TO DEVELOP
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL EXPERTISE
2. PRODUCT / SERVICE LINE
PROS
• SALES REPS BECOME THE EXPERT ON A
SPECIFIC PRODUCT THEY SELL,
THEREBY BETTER ABLE TO
COMMUNICATE ITS VALUE AND USE
CASE FOR INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS
CONS
• REPS MAY FOCUS MORE ON THE
FEATURES OF THE PRODUCTS THEY ARE
SELLING, AND NOT THE BEST
SOLUTION FOR THE CUSTOMER.
3. CUSTOMER / ACCOUNT SIZE
PROS
• REPS BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE
INTRICACIES OF THESE ACCOUNTS AND
MEET THE NEEDS OF THE CUSTOMER
AND COMPANY
CONS
• DIFFICULT TO MANAGE RESOURCES
• CONSTANT COMMUNICATION WITH
TEAM MEMBERS TO ENSURE ALL
CLIENTS RECEIVE THE SAME QUALITY
OF SERVICE
4. INDUSTRY / VERTICAL SEGMENT
PROS
• REPS ARE WELL-VERSED IN HOW TO
POSITION OFFERING TO THESE
VARIOUS VERTICALS BY ORGANIZING
THEIR SALES TEAMS ACCORDINGLY
CONS
• ONE OF THE MOST EXPENSIVE WAYS TO
STRUCTURE A SALES TEAM
5. COMBINATION / HYBRID STRUCTURE
PROS
• MINIMISE DISADVANTAGES OF
OTHER STRUCTURES
CONS
• MOST EXPENSIVE WAY TO
STRUCTURE A SALES TEAM
38 – Akhilesh Tonpe
43 – Mohit Rohera
46 – Nikhil Hirani
49 – Tushar Mirchandani
56 – Jagruti Advani
57 – Priya Bhatia
THANK YOU

Presentation - Sales organisation and structure

  • 1.
  • 2.
    WHAT IS SALES ORGANISATION? •AN ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT WITHIN LOGISTICS, THAT STRUCTURES THE COMPANY ACCORDING TO ITS SALES REQUIREMENTS. • RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS AND SERVICES.
  • 3.
    • DISTRIBUTION CHAINSWHICH DETERMINE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR A DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL • 4 MOST COMMON SALES ORGANISATION STRUCTURES - STRUCTURE 1. LINE ORGANISATION 2. LINE AND STAFF ORGANISATION 3. FUNCTIONAL ORGANISATION 4. HORIZONTAL ORGANISATION
  • 4.
    1. LINE ORGANISATION PROS •SIMPLE ORGANIZATION, CLEAR AUTHORITY, QUICK DECISIONS, LOW COST CONS • NO SUPPORT TO LINE MANAGERS FROM SUBORDINATES WHO HAVE SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE / SKILLS • LESS TIME FOR PLANNING / ANALYSIS
  • 5.
    2. LINE ANDSTAFF ORGANISATION PROS • BETTER MARKETING DECISIONS, SUPERIOR SALES PERFORMANCE CONS • HIGH COST AND COORDINATION, SLOWER DECISION MAKING • CONFLICT MAY ARISE IF STAFF MANAGERS’ ROLE IS NOT CLEAR
  • 6.
    3. FUNCTIONAL ORGANISATION PROS •QUALIFIED SPECIALISTS GUIDE SALES FORCE, SIMPLE TO ADMINISTER CONS • CONFUSION TO SALESPEOPLE
  • 7.
    4. HORIZONTAL ORGANISATION PROS •REDUCTION IN SUPERVISION, UNNECESSARY TASKS, & COST • IMPROVED EFFICIENCY AND CUSTOMER RESPONSES CONS • PRESSURE ON PLANNING TEAM FOR COORDINATION
  • 8.
    SPECIALISED STRUCTURES CRITERIA FOR SELECTION- • PRODUCT AND SERVICE • SALES FORCE ABILITIES • DEMANDS OF SELLING • CUSTOMERS AND MARKETS
  • 9.
    SPECIALISED STRUCTURE 1. GEOGRAPHY/ TERRITORY 2. PRODUCT / SERVICE LINE 3. CUSTOMER / ACCOUNT SIZE 4. INDUSTRY / VERTICAL SEGMENT 5. COMBINATION / HYBRID STRUCTURE
  • 10.
    1. GEOGRAPHY /TERRITORY PROS • DEVELOP FAMILIARITY WITH A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION • BUILD RAPPORT WITH LOCAL BUSINESSES, GET TO KNOW REGIONAL COMPETITORS, AND TRACK TARGET ACCOUNTS CONS • WORKING IN SILOS, INHIBITING THEIR ABILITY TO DEVELOP CROSS-FUNCTIONAL EXPERTISE
  • 11.
    2. PRODUCT /SERVICE LINE PROS • SALES REPS BECOME THE EXPERT ON A SPECIFIC PRODUCT THEY SELL, THEREBY BETTER ABLE TO COMMUNICATE ITS VALUE AND USE CASE FOR INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS CONS • REPS MAY FOCUS MORE ON THE FEATURES OF THE PRODUCTS THEY ARE SELLING, AND NOT THE BEST SOLUTION FOR THE CUSTOMER.
  • 12.
    3. CUSTOMER /ACCOUNT SIZE PROS • REPS BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE INTRICACIES OF THESE ACCOUNTS AND MEET THE NEEDS OF THE CUSTOMER AND COMPANY CONS • DIFFICULT TO MANAGE RESOURCES • CONSTANT COMMUNICATION WITH TEAM MEMBERS TO ENSURE ALL CLIENTS RECEIVE THE SAME QUALITY OF SERVICE
  • 13.
    4. INDUSTRY /VERTICAL SEGMENT PROS • REPS ARE WELL-VERSED IN HOW TO POSITION OFFERING TO THESE VARIOUS VERTICALS BY ORGANIZING THEIR SALES TEAMS ACCORDINGLY CONS • ONE OF THE MOST EXPENSIVE WAYS TO STRUCTURE A SALES TEAM
  • 14.
    5. COMBINATION /HYBRID STRUCTURE PROS • MINIMISE DISADVANTAGES OF OTHER STRUCTURES CONS • MOST EXPENSIVE WAY TO STRUCTURE A SALES TEAM
  • 15.
    38 – AkhileshTonpe 43 – Mohit Rohera 46 – Nikhil Hirani 49 – Tushar Mirchandani 56 – Jagruti Advani 57 – Priya Bhatia THANK YOU