Materi paparan #SainsTerbuka di Program Studi Psikologi, FISIP, Universitas Brawijaya, 2019. Beberapa pemantik ke depan:
1. Open Science (atau: Science): membiarkan semua pihak mengetahui dan terlibat dalam proses sains manapun, termasuk tinjauan sejawat pada saat menulis proposal riset. Aneh jika kita tidak tahu tetangga kita mengerjakan riset apa, dan ternyata satu topik dengan kita.
2. Beberapa insentif tingkat institusional: memberikan sabuk untuk jurnal yang menerapkan preregistrasi, atau perguruan tinggi memberikan kriteria angka kredit bagi kenaikan jabatan akademik/jabatan fungsional bagi dosen/peneliti yang melakukan praktik open science.
3. Akses terbuka memungkinkan dilakukannya penggunaan kembali (lihat lisensinya) bahkan meta-analisis, bukan hanya bebas membaca. Stigma terhadap kualitas jurnal dengan akses terbuka, disebabkan karena ulah sejumlah penerbit predator yang juga menampilkan tampang akses terbuka.
4. Open peer review bukan hanya soal 'open'-nya, tetapi juga soal menyeimbangkan sentimen reviewer tertentu. Semua hasil review tidak bisa tidak mesti dipertanggungjawabkan kepada publik, bukan hanya kepada editor jurnal secara single-blind atau double-blind. Manajemen impresi reviewer dapat mendorong review yang lebih konstruktif. Di samping itu, manajemen pengetahuan hasil-hasil open review merupakan 'modal sosial', di samping 'kapital pengetahuan', yang luar biasa. Kualitas open peer review memiliki variasi tingkatan; ScienceOpen menerapkan moderasi dan filter kualifikasi reviewer, misalnya. Lokus open peer review bisa di dalam atau di luar artikel itu sendiri.
5. Falsifikasi tabel atau gambar dapat diperkecil dengan open data.
6. Sudah saatnya bukan hanya publikasi yang dapat dianggap memberikan kontribusi kepada sains, tetapi juga deposisi data dalam depositori dan juga open data serta penerbitan data (lihat juga: data in brief).
7. Gerakan yang lebih 'radikal' adalah open notebook yang berlangsung secara 'real time' juntuk setiap fase dan faset kegiatan penelitian.
Open Access and Research Integrity Workshop Introduction - 2014Right to Research
The document discusses open access and research integrity. It introduces Joe McArthur and the Right to Research Coalition, which advocates for student access to research. It notes that 40% of researchers lack access to needed resources and journal prices are rising much faster than inflation. The document argues that as most research is publicly funded, the publishing system should share public values of accessibility and integrity. It introduces open access as providing free online access and full reuse rights. There are two paths to open access - self-archiving in repositories or publishing in open access journals. Open access articles appear to be cited more and downloaded more, suggesting increased visibility.
Scholarly Communication May 12-13, 2009Joseph Kraus
This document discusses scholarly communication and provides resources for learning more. It introduces Joseph Kraus as the presenter and provides his contact information. It then lists numerous links to websites that discuss creating change in scholarly publishing, how researchers benefit from sharing work, publisher copyright policies regarding self-archiving, and more. The document encourages joining the Scholarly Communication and Open Access Taskforce and advertises a symposium in the fall.
The document discusses open access and its importance for equality in research. It notes that open access allows all researchers and students to access scholarly literature regardless of their ability to pay. However, commercial academic publishers have made publishing into a highly profitable business, resulting in rapidly rising subscription costs that restrict access. The document advocates for open access policies and self-archiving of research to make knowledge publicly available.
Illustrative Global Endorsements of my article Future of Ethically Effective ...Chaudhary Imran Sarwar
The document lists 49 endorsements and citations of the author's article "Future of Ethically Effective Leadership" published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Some of the key points include:
- The article has been recommended reading material at La Trobe University in Australia for the last three years.
- It has been cited in theses and papers from various universities around the world, including Walden University, Middle Tennessee State University, and Cardiff Metropolitan University.
- The article has been included in resources and materials for courses at Royal Roads University and Liberty University.
- It has received over 10 citations in Google Scholar, indicating it is widely cited.
- Various libraries and databases have included the
In 2018, the SciELO Program will celebrate 20 years of operation, in full alignment with the advances of open science.
The SciELO 20 Years Conference will address and debate – during its three-day program – the main political, methodological and technological issues that define today’s state of the art in scholarly communication and the trends and innovations that is shaping the future of the universal openness of scholarly publishing and its relationship with today’s Open Access journals, in particular those of the SciELO Network.
The program of the conference is organized around the alignment of SciELO journals and operations with the best practices on communication of open science, such as publishing research data, expediting editorial processes and communication through the continuous publication of articles and the adoption of preprints, maximizing the transparency of research evaluation and the flow of scholarly communication, and searching for more comprehensive systems for assessing research, articles and journals.
A two-day meeting of the coordinators of the national collections of the SciELO Network will take place prior to the Conference with focus on the evaluation of SciELO journals and the SciELO Program and their improvement following the lines of action that will guide their development in the forthcoming five years.
The celebration of SciELO’s 20-year anniversary constitutes an important landmark in SciELO’s evolution, and an exceptional moment to promote the advancement of an inclusive, global approach to scholarly communication and to the open access movement while respecting the diversities of thematic and geographic areas, as well as of languages of scientific research.
Your work, your rights? Open access in academia in the Netherlands (2012). Sabine K. Lengger
The document discusses open access (OA) publishing and copyright issues. It notes that OA aims to increase visibility and fairness of research while reducing costs. There are two main types of OA - gold OA journals which are fully open access, and green OA which involves self-archiving in repositories. Many funders now require or encourage OA publishing. While authors often sign over full copyright to journals, they can negotiate to retain some rights like archiving preprints. Students discussed their experiences with OA and suggested hosting workshops and talks to better inform their institution on OA publishing options and copyright issues.
AUTHOR:ARTHUR SALE
The Open Source movement, of which Linux is a shining example, is a showcase of how accessibility makes for excellence. A parallel thrust is currently being conducted in the research institutions and the publishing industries of the world to create Open Access to the world’s publicly funded research. Arthur Sale will trace the origin of the movement, its economics and the forces holding it back, and where we are now, particularly in Australia. Open Access, or OA, has very many more active participants than Open Source, and many more nay-sayers, cautious Scrooges, and ignorant people. The struggle is titanic – the benefits equally large!
http://freeasinfreedom.modernthings.org/d/doku.php?id=arthur_sale
What the open access movement doesn't want you to knowPattie Pattie
The document discusses issues with the open-access movement that advocates often ignore or downplay. It notes that while open-access aims to provide free access to research, it shifts costs from consumers to authors through article processing fees. This can disadvantage researchers from less-funded institutions. Additionally, the document raises concerns about the exploitative practices and poor quality control of many open-access journals, including fake peer review processes and publishing dubious scientific claims to promote political agendas. The open-access model is seen as prioritizing authors over readers and eliminating value-added services from traditional publishers.
Open Access and Research Integrity Workshop Introduction - 2014Right to Research
The document discusses open access and research integrity. It introduces Joe McArthur and the Right to Research Coalition, which advocates for student access to research. It notes that 40% of researchers lack access to needed resources and journal prices are rising much faster than inflation. The document argues that as most research is publicly funded, the publishing system should share public values of accessibility and integrity. It introduces open access as providing free online access and full reuse rights. There are two paths to open access - self-archiving in repositories or publishing in open access journals. Open access articles appear to be cited more and downloaded more, suggesting increased visibility.
Scholarly Communication May 12-13, 2009Joseph Kraus
This document discusses scholarly communication and provides resources for learning more. It introduces Joseph Kraus as the presenter and provides his contact information. It then lists numerous links to websites that discuss creating change in scholarly publishing, how researchers benefit from sharing work, publisher copyright policies regarding self-archiving, and more. The document encourages joining the Scholarly Communication and Open Access Taskforce and advertises a symposium in the fall.
The document discusses open access and its importance for equality in research. It notes that open access allows all researchers and students to access scholarly literature regardless of their ability to pay. However, commercial academic publishers have made publishing into a highly profitable business, resulting in rapidly rising subscription costs that restrict access. The document advocates for open access policies and self-archiving of research to make knowledge publicly available.
Illustrative Global Endorsements of my article Future of Ethically Effective ...Chaudhary Imran Sarwar
The document lists 49 endorsements and citations of the author's article "Future of Ethically Effective Leadership" published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Some of the key points include:
- The article has been recommended reading material at La Trobe University in Australia for the last three years.
- It has been cited in theses and papers from various universities around the world, including Walden University, Middle Tennessee State University, and Cardiff Metropolitan University.
- The article has been included in resources and materials for courses at Royal Roads University and Liberty University.
- It has received over 10 citations in Google Scholar, indicating it is widely cited.
- Various libraries and databases have included the
In 2018, the SciELO Program will celebrate 20 years of operation, in full alignment with the advances of open science.
The SciELO 20 Years Conference will address and debate – during its three-day program – the main political, methodological and technological issues that define today’s state of the art in scholarly communication and the trends and innovations that is shaping the future of the universal openness of scholarly publishing and its relationship with today’s Open Access journals, in particular those of the SciELO Network.
The program of the conference is organized around the alignment of SciELO journals and operations with the best practices on communication of open science, such as publishing research data, expediting editorial processes and communication through the continuous publication of articles and the adoption of preprints, maximizing the transparency of research evaluation and the flow of scholarly communication, and searching for more comprehensive systems for assessing research, articles and journals.
A two-day meeting of the coordinators of the national collections of the SciELO Network will take place prior to the Conference with focus on the evaluation of SciELO journals and the SciELO Program and their improvement following the lines of action that will guide their development in the forthcoming five years.
The celebration of SciELO’s 20-year anniversary constitutes an important landmark in SciELO’s evolution, and an exceptional moment to promote the advancement of an inclusive, global approach to scholarly communication and to the open access movement while respecting the diversities of thematic and geographic areas, as well as of languages of scientific research.
Your work, your rights? Open access in academia in the Netherlands (2012). Sabine K. Lengger
The document discusses open access (OA) publishing and copyright issues. It notes that OA aims to increase visibility and fairness of research while reducing costs. There are two main types of OA - gold OA journals which are fully open access, and green OA which involves self-archiving in repositories. Many funders now require or encourage OA publishing. While authors often sign over full copyright to journals, they can negotiate to retain some rights like archiving preprints. Students discussed their experiences with OA and suggested hosting workshops and talks to better inform their institution on OA publishing options and copyright issues.
AUTHOR:ARTHUR SALE
The Open Source movement, of which Linux is a shining example, is a showcase of how accessibility makes for excellence. A parallel thrust is currently being conducted in the research institutions and the publishing industries of the world to create Open Access to the world’s publicly funded research. Arthur Sale will trace the origin of the movement, its economics and the forces holding it back, and where we are now, particularly in Australia. Open Access, or OA, has very many more active participants than Open Source, and many more nay-sayers, cautious Scrooges, and ignorant people. The struggle is titanic – the benefits equally large!
http://freeasinfreedom.modernthings.org/d/doku.php?id=arthur_sale
What the open access movement doesn't want you to knowPattie Pattie
The document discusses issues with the open-access movement that advocates often ignore or downplay. It notes that while open-access aims to provide free access to research, it shifts costs from consumers to authors through article processing fees. This can disadvantage researchers from less-funded institutions. Additionally, the document raises concerns about the exploitative practices and poor quality control of many open-access journals, including fake peer review processes and publishing dubious scientific claims to promote political agendas. The open-access model is seen as prioritizing authors over readers and eliminating value-added services from traditional publishers.
This document summarizes a presentation on increasing the impact of research through open access. It notes that journal prices have risen much faster than other costs, such as monographs. Most research is publicly funded but access is restricted behind paywalls. Open access provides free, immediate access to scholarly articles with full reuse rights. It outlines two paths to open access - self-archiving in open repositories or publishing in open access journals. The presentation encourages students to advocate for open access on their campuses through events for Open Access Week and other initiatives. It provides information on the Right to Research Coalition and how students can get involved in advocating for open access.
Hard won: the challenges of obtaining scholarly communication knowledge & skillsDanny Kingsley
This is a talk presented to ALIA HLA Lunchtime Series 2021: 'All things Open' - updates on the current state of Open Scholarship in Australia: Event 1
ABSTRACT: "This talk will consider the challenges associated with identifying and acquiring the skills needed in scholarly communication. It will describe some of the findings from a recent Australasian survey https://cpas.anu.edu.au/research/research-projects/scholarly-communication-knowledge-and-skills-australasian-research considering the educational and training backgrounds of people working in scholarly communication support, and their confidence in a range of specific competencies. The talk will also discuss the need to identify and articulate a curriculum for scholarly communication for the research community and how this will both inform the skill sets needed within academic and other research libraries and assist future workforce planning."
This document provides resources for research for students studying computing at Middlesex University. It outlines various library databases, search tools, and resources available through the university library. These include the library search, journal databases, citation searching on Web of Science, setting up alerts through Zetoc, inter-library loans, Google Scholar, referencing tools like Cite Them Right Online and RefWorks, Lynda training videos, and subject guides for computing. Contact information is provided for getting help from the librarian for computing students.
Open Access for Research: The Librarian Overview of Opportunities & Trends Pavlinka Kovatcheva
This document provides an overview of opportunities and trends in open access for research. It outlines the librarian's presentation topics including open access for research, institutional repositories, open access journals, social media and research, and librarian support for researchers. The presentation aims to inform researchers about maximizing access to research findings and increasing research impact through open access.
This document provides an overview of open access (OA) publishing and its benefits. It discusses how OA provides free access to scholarly works online, benefiting readers, authors, and fields of study. Both "gold" OA journals that are open from inception, and "green" OA that allows authors to self-archive in repositories, are covered. While traditional publishers claim most readers have access via libraries, the presentation argues that OA benefits many beyond academic institutions as well. Peer review and impact are independent of open access status.
Impacts, consequences and outcomes of open policies in EuropeDanny Kingsley
The document discusses open policies in Europe and their impacts. It summarizes key points from a webinar on the topic, including cascading cancellations of publisher subscriptions, threats to the credibility of science from selective use of evidence, issues with overreliance on metrics, and policy confusion from many new initiatives. It notes fightbacks through reproducibility efforts but also risks like incentivizing risk-averse research. Overall it analyzes challenges to open science from various pressures and proposes moving beyond only counting publications in high-impact journals.
This document provides information about open educational resources (OER) available freely for students and teachers across various subject areas, including math, natural sciences, and social sciences. It lists curricular resources, mini-sites, and instructor blogs related to these subjects on the Hippocampus website. Additional sections provide information on OER commons, learning object repositories, and catalogs of repositories. Links are included for copyright considerations and international OER development projects. The resources were compiled to accompany a presentation on the value and applications of open educational resources.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
The Library and 1st year Science Students: Collaboration in Teaching Informat...Pavlinka Kovatcheva
The document summarizes Pavlinka Kovatcheva's presentation on information literacy training provided to first year science students at the University of Johannesburg in 2012. It describes orientation sessions, library tours, subject-specific training sessions, one-on-one consultations, online resources and tutorials provided to help students develop skills in finding and evaluating academic information. It also discusses collaborations with academic staff to integrate literacy instruction and assessments into coursework. Feedback was largely positive and recommendations were made to strengthen partnerships between librarians and faculty.
This document discusses the hybrid publishing model known as Springer Open Choice. Under this model, authors have the choice to publish their accepted article open access by paying an article processing fee, or through traditional subscription methods. The key points are:
1) This was the first major publisher to implement this hybrid model across their entire journal portfolio.
2) It allows authors to choose open access publication only after an article has undergone peer review and been accepted.
3) Open access articles are included in both the online and printed versions of journals.
4) Critics argue this model risks authors paying twice, but processing fees only cover costs of open access articles and are not factored into subscription rates.
The document provides a summer reading list focused on online education and technology in education. It includes links to over 30 articles from sources like the New York Times, Smartplanet blog, and The Chronicle of Higher Education addressing topics such as the use of iPads in education, e-textbooks, online learning, and the future of the classroom with technology. The reading list aims to stimulate thinking on related issues in education technology and futures.
Disrupting academic publishing: a future role for librariesBrian Hole
The document discusses Ubiquity Press and its mission to disrupt academic publishing by returning control of publishing to universities. It provides background on Ubiquity Press, noting that it was spun out of University College London in 2012 and aims to help universities establish their own publishing platforms to lower costs and increase prestige. The document also discusses the changing landscape in academic publishing, with moves toward open access mandates in the UK, EU, and US that will require publicly funded research to be published open access.
The document discusses open access to scientific literature. It defines open access as digital content that is free of charge and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. It describes the benefits of open access as maximizing research visibility, usage, and impact. There are two main ways to achieve open access: self-archiving research articles in open repositories (the "green" route) or publishing in open access journals that do not charge subscription fees (the "gold" route). The document provides an overview of tools and standards that help implement open access institutional repositories, including the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH).
Of CUNY, By CUNY, For CUNY: How Open Access Can Benefit Everyone at CUNY (and...Jill Cirasella
CUNY would greatly benefit from open access to scholarly works. An institutional repository at CUNY could make faculty research more accessible and increase its impact, while benefiting students and libraries. Many funding agencies and universities support open access policies. CUNY establishing its own institutional repository would make it easier for faculty to share their works openly through green open access self-archiving.
Out in the open: supporting researchers in navigating the open research envir...Helen Blanchett
Supporting material for the "Out in the open: supporting researchers in navigating the open research environment" workshop delivered by Helen Blanchett, Jisc and Dr Rob Daley, Heriot-Watt University at the Vitae Researcher Development International Conference, Manchester 2016.
Workshop overview:
Implementing open access and open data in response to funder mandates has had a significant impact on research institutions, in terms of reporting compliance, managing new processes and workflows and changing culture. Researchers, their outputs and their practice are at the heart of the process. Institutions are exploring the best ways to engage researchers and ensure compliance, without losing sight of the true goals of ‘openness’.
This interactive workshop will provide a space to discuss key challenges and solutions in supporting researchers in the open research landscape, with a particular focus on open access and open data.
The workshop will provide an opportunity to learn from other attendees as well as from the facilitators. Helen Blanchett will highlight findings and resources from the Jisc’s Open Access Good Practice ‘pathfinder’ projects, which explored the impact of implementing open access in institutions across the UK. Rob Daley will share his experiences of supporting open data implementation at Heriot-Watt University.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
Open Access, Data and Education for Global Surgery RSM 2016 Right to Research
This document summarizes Joe McArthur's presentation on open access to research. It discusses the high costs of accessing scholarly articles through traditional publishers, noting that much research is publicly funded. It promotes two paths to open access - self-archiving works in open repositories or publishing in open access journals. The Right to Research Coalition advocates for students' right to access research and educates about open access issues. The presentation encourages actions like advocating for open policies and sharing explanatory materials to advance open access goals.
This document discusses open science and research. It defines open science as making research transparent and accessible at all stages of the research process through open access, open data, open source code and open notebooks. It outlines the key elements of open science like open access publishing, open data repositories, open source software, citizen science and more. It also discusses open science initiatives in Europe, Africa and South Africa and the need for urgent policy actions to promote open science.
This document summarizes a presentation on increasing the impact of research through open access. It notes that journal prices have risen much faster than other costs, such as monographs. Most research is publicly funded but access is restricted behind paywalls. Open access provides free, immediate access to scholarly articles with full reuse rights. It outlines two paths to open access - self-archiving in open repositories or publishing in open access journals. The presentation encourages students to advocate for open access on their campuses through events for Open Access Week and other initiatives. It provides information on the Right to Research Coalition and how students can get involved in advocating for open access.
Hard won: the challenges of obtaining scholarly communication knowledge & skillsDanny Kingsley
This is a talk presented to ALIA HLA Lunchtime Series 2021: 'All things Open' - updates on the current state of Open Scholarship in Australia: Event 1
ABSTRACT: "This talk will consider the challenges associated with identifying and acquiring the skills needed in scholarly communication. It will describe some of the findings from a recent Australasian survey https://cpas.anu.edu.au/research/research-projects/scholarly-communication-knowledge-and-skills-australasian-research considering the educational and training backgrounds of people working in scholarly communication support, and their confidence in a range of specific competencies. The talk will also discuss the need to identify and articulate a curriculum for scholarly communication for the research community and how this will both inform the skill sets needed within academic and other research libraries and assist future workforce planning."
This document provides resources for research for students studying computing at Middlesex University. It outlines various library databases, search tools, and resources available through the university library. These include the library search, journal databases, citation searching on Web of Science, setting up alerts through Zetoc, inter-library loans, Google Scholar, referencing tools like Cite Them Right Online and RefWorks, Lynda training videos, and subject guides for computing. Contact information is provided for getting help from the librarian for computing students.
Open Access for Research: The Librarian Overview of Opportunities & Trends Pavlinka Kovatcheva
This document provides an overview of opportunities and trends in open access for research. It outlines the librarian's presentation topics including open access for research, institutional repositories, open access journals, social media and research, and librarian support for researchers. The presentation aims to inform researchers about maximizing access to research findings and increasing research impact through open access.
This document provides an overview of open access (OA) publishing and its benefits. It discusses how OA provides free access to scholarly works online, benefiting readers, authors, and fields of study. Both "gold" OA journals that are open from inception, and "green" OA that allows authors to self-archive in repositories, are covered. While traditional publishers claim most readers have access via libraries, the presentation argues that OA benefits many beyond academic institutions as well. Peer review and impact are independent of open access status.
Impacts, consequences and outcomes of open policies in EuropeDanny Kingsley
The document discusses open policies in Europe and their impacts. It summarizes key points from a webinar on the topic, including cascading cancellations of publisher subscriptions, threats to the credibility of science from selective use of evidence, issues with overreliance on metrics, and policy confusion from many new initiatives. It notes fightbacks through reproducibility efforts but also risks like incentivizing risk-averse research. Overall it analyzes challenges to open science from various pressures and proposes moving beyond only counting publications in high-impact journals.
This document provides information about open educational resources (OER) available freely for students and teachers across various subject areas, including math, natural sciences, and social sciences. It lists curricular resources, mini-sites, and instructor blogs related to these subjects on the Hippocampus website. Additional sections provide information on OER commons, learning object repositories, and catalogs of repositories. Links are included for copyright considerations and international OER development projects. The resources were compiled to accompany a presentation on the value and applications of open educational resources.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
The Library and 1st year Science Students: Collaboration in Teaching Informat...Pavlinka Kovatcheva
The document summarizes Pavlinka Kovatcheva's presentation on information literacy training provided to first year science students at the University of Johannesburg in 2012. It describes orientation sessions, library tours, subject-specific training sessions, one-on-one consultations, online resources and tutorials provided to help students develop skills in finding and evaluating academic information. It also discusses collaborations with academic staff to integrate literacy instruction and assessments into coursework. Feedback was largely positive and recommendations were made to strengthen partnerships between librarians and faculty.
This document discusses the hybrid publishing model known as Springer Open Choice. Under this model, authors have the choice to publish their accepted article open access by paying an article processing fee, or through traditional subscription methods. The key points are:
1) This was the first major publisher to implement this hybrid model across their entire journal portfolio.
2) It allows authors to choose open access publication only after an article has undergone peer review and been accepted.
3) Open access articles are included in both the online and printed versions of journals.
4) Critics argue this model risks authors paying twice, but processing fees only cover costs of open access articles and are not factored into subscription rates.
The document provides a summer reading list focused on online education and technology in education. It includes links to over 30 articles from sources like the New York Times, Smartplanet blog, and The Chronicle of Higher Education addressing topics such as the use of iPads in education, e-textbooks, online learning, and the future of the classroom with technology. The reading list aims to stimulate thinking on related issues in education technology and futures.
Disrupting academic publishing: a future role for librariesBrian Hole
The document discusses Ubiquity Press and its mission to disrupt academic publishing by returning control of publishing to universities. It provides background on Ubiquity Press, noting that it was spun out of University College London in 2012 and aims to help universities establish their own publishing platforms to lower costs and increase prestige. The document also discusses the changing landscape in academic publishing, with moves toward open access mandates in the UK, EU, and US that will require publicly funded research to be published open access.
The document discusses open access to scientific literature. It defines open access as digital content that is free of charge and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. It describes the benefits of open access as maximizing research visibility, usage, and impact. There are two main ways to achieve open access: self-archiving research articles in open repositories (the "green" route) or publishing in open access journals that do not charge subscription fees (the "gold" route). The document provides an overview of tools and standards that help implement open access institutional repositories, including the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH).
Of CUNY, By CUNY, For CUNY: How Open Access Can Benefit Everyone at CUNY (and...Jill Cirasella
CUNY would greatly benefit from open access to scholarly works. An institutional repository at CUNY could make faculty research more accessible and increase its impact, while benefiting students and libraries. Many funding agencies and universities support open access policies. CUNY establishing its own institutional repository would make it easier for faculty to share their works openly through green open access self-archiving.
Out in the open: supporting researchers in navigating the open research envir...Helen Blanchett
Supporting material for the "Out in the open: supporting researchers in navigating the open research environment" workshop delivered by Helen Blanchett, Jisc and Dr Rob Daley, Heriot-Watt University at the Vitae Researcher Development International Conference, Manchester 2016.
Workshop overview:
Implementing open access and open data in response to funder mandates has had a significant impact on research institutions, in terms of reporting compliance, managing new processes and workflows and changing culture. Researchers, their outputs and their practice are at the heart of the process. Institutions are exploring the best ways to engage researchers and ensure compliance, without losing sight of the true goals of ‘openness’.
This interactive workshop will provide a space to discuss key challenges and solutions in supporting researchers in the open research landscape, with a particular focus on open access and open data.
The workshop will provide an opportunity to learn from other attendees as well as from the facilitators. Helen Blanchett will highlight findings and resources from the Jisc’s Open Access Good Practice ‘pathfinder’ projects, which explored the impact of implementing open access in institutions across the UK. Rob Daley will share his experiences of supporting open data implementation at Heriot-Watt University.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
Open Access, Data and Education for Global Surgery RSM 2016 Right to Research
This document summarizes Joe McArthur's presentation on open access to research. It discusses the high costs of accessing scholarly articles through traditional publishers, noting that much research is publicly funded. It promotes two paths to open access - self-archiving works in open repositories or publishing in open access journals. The Right to Research Coalition advocates for students' right to access research and educates about open access issues. The presentation encourages actions like advocating for open policies and sharing explanatory materials to advance open access goals.
This document discusses open science and research. It defines open science as making research transparent and accessible at all stages of the research process through open access, open data, open source code and open notebooks. It outlines the key elements of open science like open access publishing, open data repositories, open source software, citizen science and more. It also discusses open science initiatives in Europe, Africa and South Africa and the need for urgent policy actions to promote open science.
CUA Humanities Lecture on Scholarly Communications LSC634 Fall2014Kimberly Hoffman
Lecture on Scholarly Communications for CUA LSC634 students Sept. 29, 2014. Activities noted by * include mining new scholarly communications job descriptions; determining open access, self archiving and author rights of individual journals using SHERPA/RoMEO; and finding bibliometrics like JIF and h-index that drive publishing.
This document discusses open science and its various components such as open data, open access, open code, and open peer review. It emphasizes that open science promotes transparency, collaboration, and reproducibility. While open science aims to make research more accessible and equitable, the document notes that open science faces challenges in terms of widespread adoption due to entrenched publishing and evaluation practices that still prioritize commercial publishers and journal impact factors over open principles. It calls for more action and systemic changes to fully realize the goals of open science.
A open science presentation focusing on the benefits to be gained and basic practices to follow. This was given on behalf of FOSTER at the Open Science Boos(t)camp event at KU Leuven on 24th October 2014.
Open Access for Early Career ResearchersRoss Mounce
My talk for the University of Bath Open Access Week session; 23rd October 2013.
http://www.bath.ac.uk/learningandteaching/rdu/courses/pgskills/modules/RP00335.htm
An introduction to open science, why it's important and how to do it. This presentation was given at the European Medical Students Association (EMSA) event, 'Open Access in Action' in Berlin on 14th-15th September 2015
The document discusses the history and current state of preprints in academic publishing. It provides context around key developments like the founding of arXiv in 1991 and more recent preprint servers for biology like bioRxiv. The document also notes funding from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to support bioRxiv and the growing acceptance of preprints across fields as a way to accelerate the sharing of research.
AWARENESS AND USAGE OF OPEN ACCESS RESOURCES AMONG RESEARCH SCHOLARS OF BHARA...Andrew Parish
This document is a project report submitted for a Master's degree in library and information science. It examines the awareness and usage of open access resources among research scholars at Bharathidasan University in India. The report includes an introduction on open access, a literature review, research design, data analysis and interpretation, findings, and conclusion. It also includes declarations, certificates, acknowledgements, tables of contents, and a bibliography. The overall purpose is to study scholars' awareness and use of open access resources at an Indian university.
Open science refers to making scientific research and data accessible to all. It includes open access to publications, open data, open source software, open notebooks, and citizen science. The European Union supports open science to increase transparency, collaboration and innovation in research. A workshop was held in South Africa to help develop an open science policy, with feedback that the policy will be finalized in September 2018 after additional workshops with European Union involvement. Open science aims to make the entire research process publicly available and reusable to maximize scientific progress.
The document discusses the transition to digital scholarly publishing and open access. It notes that while the internet provides a platform for knowledge sharing, traditional publishing models have restricted access through paywalls. Some progress has been made through open access journals and self-archiving. Looking ahead, repositories have the potential to go beyond publishing articles by providing access to data and enabling new forms of collaborative research through tools and services. This vision of enhanced scholarly collaboration online is referred to as "E-Science".
The document discusses the transition to digital scholarly publishing and open access. It notes that while the internet provides a platform for knowledge sharing, traditional publishing models have restricted access through paywalls. Some progress has been made through open access journals and self-archiving. Looking ahead, repositories could become nodes for open data sharing and collaboration, supporting new forms of e-science beyond traditional articles.
The slides that will accompany my live webcast for OpenCon 2014 attendees, all about open data in research. The benefits, the how to (both legally & technically), examples, pitfalls, and the future of open research data.
Open access to research has been shown to accelerate the research cycle and increase citations and usage of articles. In high-energy physics, researchers have openly shared preprints for decades through arXiv, allowing findings to be rapidly built upon. Analysis of arXiv usage shows the time between preprint posting and citation has significantly decreased as open access has increased. Studies also consistently find that open access articles receive more citations, with some seeing a 600% increase, than articles hidden behind paywalls. However, journal impact factors should not be used to evaluate individual researchers or papers, as they measure prestige rather than use or quality.
The document discusses open access publishing, which makes scholarly works freely available online without subscription fees. It notes that open access can increase visibility and impact of research. There are two main types of open access - gold, which is immediately available online, and green, which is available through repositories after an embargo period. While open access has benefits, challenges include improving research quality as some open access journals accept dubious works, and addressing high article processing charges. Tools are being developed to help identify predatory open access journals.
1) The rapid growth in the number of published academic articles has created difficulties for traditional publishing models and information overload.
2) While the internet has provided a platform for increased knowledge sharing, the transfer of traditional publishing systems online has come with exclusive access rights that restrict information access.
3) In response, some scholars have established their own open access electronic journals, and increasingly share preprints, postprints, and other works through personal or institutional websites and repositories. However, publishers remain concerned this could undermine revenue and peer review processes.
Similar to Sains Terbuka: From Psychology with Love in Science (20)
Pada 15 Agustus 2022, saya mengisi Diskusi Panel di AIESEC in BINUS dengan payung topik besar Balancing between Physical Health and Mental Health (Menyeimbangkan Kesehatan Fisik dan Kesehatan Mental).
Kegiatan ini merupakan rangkaian SDG Level Up. Informasi selengkapnya: http://www.juneman.me/2022/08/16/kesehatan-mental-memikirkan-kembali-sikap-sikap-kita/
Mengapropriasi Wikipedia (Webinar Miskonsepsi Wikipedia Dalam Pendidikan)Juneman Abraham
Wikimedia Indonesia menyelenggarakan webinar dengan judul “Miskonsepsi Wikipedia dalam Dunia Pendidikan” untuk memberi wawasan dan pengalaman baru kepada masyarakat umum, kalangan guru, dan akademisi di Indonesia.
Webinar ini dilaksanakan pada hari Kamis, 9 Desember 2021, pukul 10.00–12.00 WIB melalui Zoom.
Terms of Reference -
Pendidikan Wikimedia Indonesia merupakan salah satu program strategis yang dilakukan oleh Wikimedia Indonesia untuk mengedukasi publik tentang proyek-proyek Wikimedia, seperti Wikipedia. Program ini melibatkan sejumlah kegiatan, termasuk pelatihan Wikipedia, sosialisasi Wikipedia, dan seminar publik.
Tim Pendidikan Wikimedia Indonesia menyadari bahwa tidak semua masyarakat umum, tenaga pendidik, dan akademisi mengetahui tentang Wikipedia dan cara kerjanya sehingga terdapat miskonsepsi bahwa Wikipedia tidak dapat dijadikan sebagai rujukan. Bahkan, sebagian besar universitas telah melarang penggunaan Wikipedia dalam lingkungan akademik. Hal ini merupakan tantangan yang harus Wikimedia Indonesia hadapi untuk meluruskan kesalahpahaman yang telah beredar.
Dengan alasan tersebut, Wikimedia Indonesia mengadakan webinar dengan judul “Miskonsepsi Wikipedia dalam Dunia Pendidikan” untuk memberikan pemahaman mengenai Wikipedia dan cara menggunakan Wikipedia yang dianjurkan. Webinar ini juga diharapkan dapat menjadi jalan pembuka untuk bekerja sama dengan lembaga pendidikan dan mensosialisasikan proyek-proyek Wikimedia kepada peserta didik dan/atau mahasiswa.
TUJUAN
1. Memaparkan dan menjelaskan kesalahpahaman umum mengenai Wikipedia dalam dunia pendidikan, khususnya di tingkat perguruan tinggi;
2. Menceritakan pengalaman berkontribusi di Wikipedia sesuai bidang yang ditekuni; dan
3. Menjelaskan peran Wikipedia sebagai sarana penyebaran ilmu pengetahuan dalam bidang tertentu.
Mental Health: A New Social Dilemma (Kesehatan Mental sebagai Isu Sosial Ber...Juneman Abraham
The Wellness Project adalah sebuah program yang diadakan oleh himpunan mahasiswa jurusan KMM ITB dibawah naungan Program Studi SBM ITB dalam
bentuk seminar daring atau lebih sering disebut dengan webinar yang mengusung tema mengenai kesehatan mental bagi mahasiswa.
Setelah mengikuti webinar ini, para mahasiswa diharapkan dapat mengetahui seberapa besar pentingnya memperhatikan kesehatan mental. Para
mahasiswa juga diharapkan memahami mengapa kesehatan mental sama pentingnya dengan kesehatan fisik terhadap diri sendiri maupun orang lain.
Tidak hanya itu, harapan webinar ini dapat membantu menyadarkan bahwa ketika seseorang dalam keadaan mental yang sehat dapat menggunakan kemampuan atau potensi dirinya secara maksimal dalam menghadapi tantangan hidup, serta menjalin hubungan positif dengan orang lain.
Detail dari materi yang dibawakan adalah sebagai berikut:
1. Memahami definisi kesehatan mental
2. Memahami kesehatan mental bukan hanya persoalan kesehatan
3. Memahami alasan mengapa harus memperhatikan kesehatan mental
4. Memahami dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap kesehatan mental
5. Memahami bagaimana cara merawat kesehatan mental
Hari/Tanggal : Rabu, 24 November 2021
Pukul : 19.00 - 20.35
Tempat : Zoom Meetings (platform)
Moderator : Rahadyan Pramudito Kumarasakti
Narasumber : Dr. Juneman Abraham, S.Psi., M.Si.
LO Pembicara : Nayla Nurhaliza
Time Keeper : Nadhya Ramadhani
Operator : Haidar Rahmady Indratno
Ulasan Buku Psikologi Indigenos karya Yosef Dedy Pradipto (2021)Juneman Abraham
Bedah buku Psikologi Indigenos: Telaah Relasi Manusia pada Konteks Budaya, dilangsungkan melalui Zoom, 31 Agustus 2021, kerjasama antara Asosiasi Psikologi Indigenos & Kultural (APIK) dengan Anuradha Academy, HIMPSI, dan Pusat-pusat Psikologi Indigenos Indonesia.
Pengasuhan yang Tangguh dan Bersahabat di Masa PandemiJuneman Abraham
Dokumen tersebut memberikan panduan bagi orangtua dalam mendukung anak selama masa pandemi, meliputi:
1. Memastikan anak merasa aman dan memiliki rutinitas sehat serta mengelola emosi dengan baik
2. Membantu anak mengembangkan keterampilan sosial dan mengatasi masalah kecanduan media
3. Mengembangkan kemandirian dan tanggung jawab pada anak melalui penegakan disiplin yang positif
4. Orangtua
Materi paparan narasumber pada acara Seminar Riset Disain "Kajian Pemanfaatan Repositori Ilmiah Nasional (RIN) Sebagai Sarana Preservasi dan Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Data dan Publikasi Penelitian: Studi Kasus Kedeputian IPSK LIPI" di lingkungan Kedeputian Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Kemanusiaan-Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (IPSK – LIPI)
Bimbingan Teknis Penyusunan Proposal Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa (PKM) 2021Juneman Abraham
Materi Paparan Dalam Webinar Zoom di ITL Trisakti untuk menjelaskan filosofi sampai dengan kiat-kiat Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa (PKM), disertai contoh-contoh judul Proposal PKM yang lolos didanai
Siapakah Pengarang - Siapakah Kontributor? Membaca dan Menulis di Jurnal IlmiahJuneman Abraham
Sekilas tentang CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy : Filosofi sampai dengan praktiknya. Disusun dan disampaikan oleh Dr. Juneman Abraham dalam acara Plagiarism Blues 20 Januari 2021.
Sekilas ANJANI (Anjungan Integritas Akademik)Juneman Abraham
Materi Sosialisasi ANJANI dalam acara bertajuk Darurat Plagiat yang diselenggarakan oleh Intelektual Independen Indonesia, 23 Desember 2020, via daring (Zoom)
Dokumen tersebut membahas cara meningkatkan employability lulusan BINUS dengan mengusulkan dua solusi. Pertama, meningkatkan program twinning untuk memberikan pengalaman lokal dan global bagi mahasiswa. Kedua, mengembangkan kompetensi konsultatif mahasiswa dengan pelatihan penyajian diagnosis awal perusahaan dan mengintegrasikannya dalam rencana pembelajaran magang. Hal ini diharapkan dapat memberikan nilai tambah bagi lingkungan lokal
Dokumen tersebut merupakan laporan self-assessment konten standar akreditasi jurnal ilmiah oleh Dr. Juneman Abraham sebagai assessor substantif akreditasi jurnal Arjuna. Laporan tersebut membahas berbagai aspek yang perlu dipenuhi untuk mendapatkan akreditasi jurnal ilmiah seperti etika publikasi, kualitas artikel, review artikel, dan lain-lain.
Self diagnose-diagnosis diri - perspektif sosialJuneman Abraham
“It’s Okay Not To Be Okay” "Mental Health" adalah salah satu topik yang lagi sering dibicarakan. Namun, masih ada juga yang sering salah paham tentang hal ini. Kali ini, PSYCLUB 2020 - Universitas Kristen Maranatha - hadir untuk mengajak kita mengenal lebih dalam, apa sih sebenernya "mental health" itu? Dan boleh gak sih, kita diagnosa diri sendiri? 'SEMINAR NASIONAL It's & Okay Not to Be Okay PAIN REAL' Sesi I Self-diagnose oleh Dr. Juneman Abraham, Psikolog Sosial dan Associate Professor dari Universitas Bina Nusantara.
Indeksasi Terbitan Ilmiah: Berkah dan Salah KaprahnyaJuneman Abraham
Dr. Juneman Abraham membahas tentang indeksasi terbitan ilmiah dan salah kaprahnya. Ia menjelaskan bahwa indeksasi merupakan alat penting untuk pengambilan informasi namun memiliki batasan seperti cakupan yang sempit dan kualitas data yang kurang. Dr. Juneman juga menyarankan perlunya membangun repositori ilmiah nasional dan kebijakan yang mendukung riset terbuka di Indonesia."
Webinar membahas tentang akreditasi jurnal ilmiah nasional, termasuk persyaratan, proses, dan solusi untuk meningkatkan mutu jurnal. Pembicara menjelaskan berbagai permasalahan seperti etika publikasi, kualitas artikel, dan pengelolaan jurnal serta memberikan saran seperti peningkatan kompetensi editor dan penggunaan sistem pengelolaan jurnal secara online.
Ringkasan dokumen tersebut adalah:
Therapeutic jurisprudence dapat digunakan dalam kasus kekerasan seksual dengan mengambil pendekatan rehabilitatif untuk pelaku dan memberikan perlindungan bagi korban dan masyarakat. Psikolog dapat membantu dengan melakukan asesmen dampak psikologis terhadap korban dan pelaku serta merekomendasikan program rehabilitasi yang tepat.
Terbuka Pada Dunia: Menulis Ilmiah di Bidang Psikologi dan KesehatanJuneman Abraham
Dr. Juneman Abraham gave a presentation about open scientific writing in psychology and health. He discussed the current landscape and resources for publishing, how to position oneself as an author, and good writing practices like using IMRAD structure. He emphasized the importance of open access publishing and repositories, finding reviewers for preprints, registered reports to promote replication, and depositing data. Overall, he provided guidance on starting the writing process and encouraged participants to engage in open and rigorous scientific practices.
Kiat Sukses Menulis Metode, Pembahasan, dan KesimpulanJuneman Abraham
This webinar discussed research methods, including epistemology, methodology, methods, validity, reliability, replication, sampling, analysis techniques, and writing conclusions. It emphasized quality, reflecting critically on one's own biases and perspective, and being transparent so others can evaluate the research process and check for biases. Examples and resources were provided about qualitative data analysis, coding, the reflexive process, and using software tools to facilitate analysis.
How to Setup Default Value for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, we can set a default value for a field during the creation of a record for a model. We have many methods in odoo for setting a default value to the field.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Creation or Update of a Mandatory Field is Not Set in Odoo 17
Sains Terbuka: From Psychology with Love in Science
1. Dr. Juneman Abraham, S.Psi.
Universitas Bina Nusantara
Dipresentasikan di: Universitas Brawijaya,Malang,November 2019
#TerbukaAtauTertinggal
about.me/juneman
Sebagian dari materi ini dipresentasikan juga di OpenCon 2018 Jakarta
12. SCIENCE AS AN
OPEN ENTERPRISE
(ROYAL SOCIETY,
2012)
▪ In May 2016 the EU Competitiveness
Council issued a mission statement that
all scientific articles should be ‘freely
accessible’ by 2020 (Enserink, 2016).
▪ ‘The time for talking about Open Access
is now past.With these agreements, we
are going to achieve it in practice’, the
Dutch state secretary for education,
culture, and science, Sander Dekker,
added in a statement.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.
1177/0306312718772086
13. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306312718772086
Open access to existing scientific publications
a different format for future scientific publication
open provision of scientific data
open peer review
openness purports to welcome the participation of
non-scientists into the research process (citizen
science)
23. ▪ Distrust of science is rampant in the general
population
▪ tobacco science,global warming (climate change),
vaccination resistance,drug efficacy,human
cloning,and a host of other disputes
▪ The opportunities for transparency,
authenticity and timeliness of the record
created by open science could both reveal the
scientific process in real time and allow claims to
be viewed within the context of their underlying
data.
▪ Open science thus has the potential to contribute
to the substantiation of the relationships which
are central both to people’s trust in science and
to science’s trust in people. (Grand et al., 2012)
▪ ‘Blogging is also a way to demythologize science.
Unlike laws and sausages, the public should see
science during its manufacture’ (J.S.Wilkins,
quoted in Ritson, 2016: 3).
THE
INDICTMENT OF
THE OLD
REGIME
(MIROWSKI, 2018)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306312718772086
24.
25. ▪ Science suffers a democracy deficit
▪ The science/industry partnership so
spurned by Dewey had become a
science/military cartel instead; and the
pragmatic logic of inquiry Dewey saw
became a foreign ‘language of science’
consisting of formal logic and
axiomatization at the hands of the logical
empiricists.
▪ The ‘freedom’ of scientists had been won at
the cost of the ‘freedom’ of the public to
have any say in science.
https://encrypted-
tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQWUP1JWZrRvRJd83gYh17lk_8TxRRjmPs75U7JMxZUkPhjDNwkXaY94y5T&shttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306312718772086
26. The slowdown in scientific
productivity
The explosion of retractions
• RetractionWatch reports that it currently logs
between 600-700 retractions per year; this
suggests a substantial rate of growth in the
first decade and a half of the new millennium.
• A second major revelation of the blog was
that, once the motives for retractions were
evoked from recalcitrant journal editors, they
were quite diverse, ranging from honest
errors to image manipulation to outright
fraud.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306312718772086
27. Fang, FC, Casadevall, A, Morrison, R (2011) Retracted science and the retraction
index. Infection and Immunity 79(10): 3855–3859.
28.
29.
30. Baker, M, Penny, D (2016) Is there a reproducibility
crisis? Nature 533: 452–453.
32. HARGAI REPLIKASIYANG SUNGGUH
Smiling will make you feel happier
Self-control is a limited resource
Cleaning your hands will wash away your guilt
Being reminded of money makes us selfish
33. ▪1. Collaborative / cooperative way of working
together
▪2. Citizen science, participatory research, research-
action
▪3. Free and open software and licences
▪4. Alternative organizations aiming to bring closer
research and society (Fablabs, makerspaces, science
shops)
▪5. Open access to scientific resources
https://www.slideshare.net/Florencepiron/fair-open-science-and-cognitive-justice
34.
35. 1ST PILLAR:
COLLABORATIVE
WORK
Open science
encourages students and
researchers to work
closely together instead
of being isolated from
fear of being robbed
Share one’s
bibliographies, notes,
papers, findings, data
Mutually criticize texts
and ideas
Multiply co-authors
Use web tools to write
and think together
Use social media Zotero,
Framapad (Free version
of Google drive),Trello,
Authorea
https://www.slideshare.net/Florencepiron/fair-open-science-and-cognitive-justice
36. 2ND PILLAR :
CITIZEN SCIENCE
In citizen science, non-scientists are invited
to participate in research projects (without
being paid) for the sake of science.
Very popular in environmental surveys and
observational activities.
Numerous projects on sci-starter website
In Participatory research-action in social
science, research subjects are invited to
participate in the design and the
interpretation of the project.
https://www.slideshare.net/Florencepiron/fair-open-science-and-cognitive-justice
38. ▪ Analisa statistik, analisa numerik, visualisasi: Microsoft R Open, RStudio, Shiny
Rstudio
▪ Reference manager: Zotero, Mendeley, dll. Mendeley termasuk pengguna terbanyak
di Indonesia.Walaupun sebenarnya gratis, tapi M e n d e l e y t i d a k o p e n s o u r
c e.
▪ Pengembangannya akan sangat bergantung kepada tim internalnya. Pengolah kata
dan tabel: LibreOffice, OpenOffice, atau bagi peneliti bidang tertentu penggunaan
LATEX dan Markdown sangat tinggi.
https://zenodo.org/record/802699/files/MS_openscience_ID_ver3_3.docx?download=1
39.
40.
41. ▪Fablabs, makerspaces, living lab, co-working
spaces : where scientists, entrepreneurs,
students, teachers, etc. can come in the same
place and try ideas, concepts, machines.
▪Science shops : a mediation service within a
university linking civil society organization
and students/professors.
https://www.slideshare.net/Florencepiron/fair-open-science-and-cognitive-justice
44. ▪Thanks to the web, more and more scientific publications
are on the web
▪● Some of these documents are accessible only by
subscription or by payment with a credit card: they are «
closed ».
▪● Some documents are accessible without any barrier :
they are in open access.
https://www.slideshare.net/Florencepiron/fair-open-science-and-cognitive-justice
46. ▪ There are 2 ways authors can provide open access to their work:
Open Access
One way is to publish an article and then self-archive it in a repository where it can be accessed for free, such as their
institutional repository, this is known as Green Open Access or Green Model.The repository allows search engines
such as Google to crawl their content so the articles are accessible on the Internet. Most publishers (called green
publishers) allow their authors to self-archive their publications in this way, though most only allow archiving of the
“accepted version” of the article.This version is the final manuscript that has been peer reviewed, not the final
formatted version published by the journal. Some publishers require delays, or a 6-12 embargo, before the article can
be available in the open repository. NTU supports this route.
Gold Open Access
A second way authors can make their work open access is by publishing it in either a pure open access journal, or a
hybrid open access journal.This is known as Gold Open Access or Gold Model. Pure open access journals do not
charge subscription fees, however, many do charge an article processing charge (APC) before it proceeds to publish it.
The latter is a journal whose business model is at least partially based on subscriptions, and only provide Gold open
access for those individual articles for which their authors (or their author's institution or funder) pay an APC. The APC
varies but can go as high as US$3000-4000. Some publishers say they will waive this fee in certain circumstances. If you
wish to go this model, you need to use your own source of funding (e.g. research funds, school funds, etc.) to pay for the
APC.The Library does not provide funding for this so it is recommended that Principal Investigators factor in this cost
into their grant proposals.
▪ http://www.ntu.edu.sg/Library/Pages/open-access.aspx#2
48. Another possible solution is
pressuring open access
journals to waive charges for
researchers in developing
countries.
Academics could also be
encouraged to write first for
journals that are affiliated to
societies. Profits from these
kinds of journals go back into
supporting science through
research grants, travel grants
and meeting support.
https://theconversation.com/how-the-open-access-model-hurts-
academics-in-poorer-countries-113856
55. ▪A geopolitical issue (competition, ratings, etc.)
▪An economic issue : For-profit publishers (Elsevier, Sage,
Nature PG, etc.) make a lot of profit in publishing (online)
and selling articles that scientists funded by public money
give them voluntarily at no cost
▪A professional issue : quantity of publications is essential to
academic careers (quality??)
▪An industrial issue : how to combine industrial secret and
publication?
https://www.slideshare.net/Florencepiron/fair-open-
science-and-cognitive-justice
56.
57. FIRST PURPOSE
OF OPEN ACCESS
▪ Improve the productivity of research and
researchers
▪ Eysenbach (2006) : Since open access
maximises the number of quotations, it « is likely
to benefit science by accelerating dissemination
and uptake of research findings ».
▪ The quicker the results are disseminated, the
quicker research advances, the more scientists
publish and the morer their career prosper
▪ Journals are (now) managers of this incessant
flux of results and papers.
http://unescochair-
cbrsr.org/pdf/presentation/Open_access_and_research_action.pdf
58.
59. A mainly economic purpose : « Open
Access to science and data = cash and
economic bonanza », according to Neelie
Kroes (2013),Vice-president of the
European community en 2013
OECD is for open access since it
increases the potentialities for innovation
: « avoiding duplication while facilitating
replication, accelerating discovery, and
driving innovation ».
Innovation that can be tranformed into
merchandise, markets.
http://unescochair-
cbrsr.org/pdf/presentation/Open_access_and_research_action.pdf
60. Democratization of access to
scientific knowledge for people
without an affiliation to a
university:
K-12 teachers
Non-professional science lovers
Civil society organizations
Journalists
Public administrations
Graduates wishing to continue to learn and
think
From a fiscal justice
viewpoint, open access
gives back to tax-payers
what they funded
through their tax.
http://unescochair-
cbrsr.org/pdf/presentation/Open_access_and_research_action.pdf
61. ▪Two possibilities for researchers:
▪Publish in an open access journal (Gold way)
▪Archive one’s papers in an institutional repository
(website) (green way)
▪Conditions :
▪Researchers must commit themselves to open access
▪They must not fear journals
▪They must have electricity and web access
▪They must have a basic digital literacy, not considering
that what is on the web is of less quality than what is
printed.
https://zenodo.org/record/231331/files/fairopenscience-
decolonisingconference-161104135344%282%29.pptx?download=1
62.
63. ▪ Our roots in innovation run deep; from mobilizing scientists’ desire for free
and Open Access to the literature and building PLOS ONE to the journal it is
today, to pioneering Article-Level Metrics as an alternative to journal
impact factors
▪ One of our top priorities this coming year is to improve the author
experience since our authors are at the center of everything we do. Among
their top concerns are ‘time to first decision’ and ‘time to publication’.We
share their concerns and are committed to reducing this time as much as
possible across all our journals.
▪ The progress made with Aperta will not be wasted effort: we are currently
exploring how to best leverage its unique strengths and capabilities to
support core PLOS priorities like preprints and innovation in peer review.
https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2017/12/ceo-letter-to-the-community-mudditt/
64. ▪Plan S is an initiative for open-access science publishing
that was launched by Science Europe on 4 September
2018.[1] It is an initiative of "cOAlition S",[2] a consortium
launched by the European Research Council and major
national research agencies and funders from twelve
European countries.The plan requires scientists and
researchers who benefit from state-funded research
organisations and institutions to publish their work in open
repositories or in journals that are available to all by
2020.[3]
▪https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_S
65. ▪ authors should retain copyright on their publications, which must be published under
an open license such as Creative Commons;
▪ the members of the coalition should establish robust criteria and requirements for
compliant open access journals and platforms;
▪ they should also provide incentives for the creation of compliant open access journals
and platforms if they do not yet exist;
▪ publication fees should be covered by the funders or universities, not individual
researchers;
▪ such publication fees should be standardized and capped;
▪ universities, research organizations, and libraries should align their policies and
strategies;
▪ for books and monographs, the timeline may be extended beyond 2020;
▪ open archives and repositories are acknowledged for their importance;
▪ hybrid open-access journals are not compliant with the key principle;
▪ members of the coalition should monitor and sanction compliance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_S
69. PRAKTIK OS BAGI
PENGELOLA DIK-TI
▪ current ‘academic freedoms’ are somewhat of a myth,
because the existing entrenched system of deciding on
funding, promotions and tenure depends more
on where you publish, than on what you publish and how
your work has value to others. Hence, authors have to try
to publish their work in the small subset of journals that
are most likely to help their careers.
▪ This scramble to publish the ‘best’ results in the ‘best’
journals causes many problems, including the high cost of
such a selective process in these ‘high-impact’ journals,
the repeated cost (both actual and time cost) of multiple
resubmissions trying to find the ‘right place’ for the
publication in the journal hierarchy, and the high
opportunity cost.
▪ What we should do, instead, is actually read the article.We
should also reward academics for publishing in venues
that are most likely to reach and impact their intended
audiences and for writing in ways that are clearly
understandable to non-specialists, when those non-
specialists are the intended audience. Instead, we are
often too quick to dismiss such publications as non-
rigorous.
https://jbrittholbrook.com/2018/09/21/on-the-myth-of-
academic-freedom/
70.
71. ▪ First, I want a tool that will allow me to compare h-indexes across different fields. I
understand that several researchers have discussed ways to make such
comparisons. Although they undoubtedly understand the math, what I (a
philosopher) want is a button I can press so that I can fairly compare my h-index
with those of scientists and engineers at the same career stage. Ideally, I’d be able
to use it on Scopus,Web of Science, and Google Scholar citation databases. And
please make it free.
▪ The same applies to other members of society, who could make good use of tools
developed for them to make academic research more accessible. Here, I mean
something that goes beyond an open-access repository. Maybe someone might be
interested in a ‘de-jargon’ tool, or a search engine that makes it easy for someone
without extensive technical knowledge to find articles related to their problems.
How could they use their own words, rather than unfamiliar technical academic
terms to find what they are looking for?
https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/the-right-tools-to-empower-researchers
72. ▪Kudos points out that explaining your research in non-
technical language increases accessibility to non-experts
and helps you get that plain-language explanation out into
the world. Kudos is also free, and its terms and conditions
are simple and friendly to academics.
https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/the-right-
tools-to-empower-researchers
73.
74. ▪ Even when sources exist on-line, external hyperlinks offer only data access, not
analytic or process transparency.We learn what a scholar cited but not why or how.
▪ A new and innovative approach is required. Scholars are converging to the view
that the most promising and practical default standard for enhancing qualitative
transparency is Active Citation (AC): a system of digitally-enabled citations linked
to annotated excerpts from original sources.
https://thepoliticalmethodologist.com/2015/01/01/one-
norm-two-standards-realizing-transparency-in-
qualitative-political-science/#_edn18
75. ▪ In the AC format, any citation to a contestable empirical claim is hyperlinked to an
entry in an appendix appended to the scholarly work (the “Transparency
Appendix” (TRAX)).[xviii] Each TRAX entry contains four elements, the first three
required and the last one optionally:
▪ a short excerpt from the source (presumptively 50-100 words long);
▪ an annotation explaining how the source supports the underlying claim in the main text
(of a length at the author’s discretion);
▪ the full citation;
▪ optionally,a scan of or link to the full source.
https://thepoliticalmethodologist.com/2015/01/01/one-
norm-two-standards-realizing-transparency-in-
qualitative-political-science/#_edn18
79. DATA
TRANSPARENCY,
OBLIGES SOCIAL SCIENTISTS
TO PUBLICIZE THE EVIDENCE
ON WHICH THEIR RESEARCH
RESTS.
ANALYTIC
TRANSPARENCY,
OBLIGES SOCIAL SCIENTISTS
TO PUBLICIZE HOW THEY
MEASURE, CODE, INTERPRET,
AND ANALYZE THAT DATA.
PROCESS
TRANSPARENCY,
OBLIGES SOCIAL SCIENTISTS
TO PUBLICIZE THE BROADER
SET OF RESEARCH DESIGN
CHOICES THAT GAVE RISE TO
THE PARTICULAR
COMBINATION OF DATA,
THEORIES, AND METHODS
THEY EMPLOY.
HTTPS://THEPOLITICALMETHO
DOLOGIST.COM/2015/01/01/O
NE-NORM-TWO-STANDARDS-
REALIZING-TRANSPARENCY-
IN-QUALITATIVE-POLITICAL-
SCIENCE/
80. ▪ Open Science (atau: Science): membiarkan semua pihak mengetahui dan terlibat
dalam proses sains manapun, termasuk tinjauan sejawat pada saat menulis
proposal riset. Aneh jika kita tidak tahu tetangga kita mengerjakan riset apa, dan
ternyata satu topik dengan kita.
▪ Beberapa insentif tingkat institusional: memberikan sabuk untuk jurnal yang
menerapkan preregistrasi, atau perguruan tinggi memberikan kriteria angka
kredit bagi kenaikan jabatan akademik/jabatan fungsional bagi
dosen/peneliti yang melakukan praktik open science.
▪ Akses terbuka memungkinkan dilakukannya penggunaan kembali (lihat
lisensinya) bahkan meta-analisis, bukan hanya bebas membaca. Stigma terhadap
kualitas jurnal dengan akses terbuka, disebabkan karena ulah sejumlah penerbit
predator yang juga menampilkan tampang akses terbuka.
https://f1000.com/resources/F1000R_Guide_OpenScience.pdf
81. ▪ Open peer review bukan hanya soal 'open'-nya, tetapi juga soal menyeimbangkan
sentimen reviewer tertentu. Semua hasil review tidak bisa tidak mesti
dipertanggungjawabkan kepada publik, bukan hanya kepada editor jurnal secara
single-blind atau double-blind. Manajemen impresi reviewer dapat mendorong review
yang lebih konstruktif. Di samping itu, manajemen pengetahuan hasil-hasil open review
merupakan 'modal sosial', di samping 'kapital pengetahuan', yang luar biasa. Kualitas
open peer review memiliki variasi tingkatan; ScienceOpen menerapkan moderasi dan
filter kualifikasi reviewer, misalnya. Lokus open peer review bisa di dalam atau di
luar artikel itu sendiri.
▪ Falsifikasi tabel atau gambar dapat diperkecil dengan open data.
▪ Sudah saatnya bukan hanya publikasi yang dapat dianggap memberikan kontribusi
kepada sains, tetapi juga deposisi data dalam depositori dan juga open data serta
penerbitan data (lihat juga: data in brief).
▪ Gerakan yang lebih 'radikal' adalah open notebook yang berlangsung secara 'real time'
juntuk setiap fase dan faset kegiatan penelitian.
https://f1000.com/resources/F1000R_Guide_OpenScience.pdf