The document discusses open access and research integrity. It introduces Joe McArthur and the Right to Research Coalition, which advocates for student access to research. It notes that 40% of researchers lack access to needed resources and journal prices are rising much faster than inflation. The document argues that as most research is publicly funded, the publishing system should share public values of accessibility and integrity. It introduces open access as providing free online access and full reuse rights. There are two paths to open access - self-archiving in repositories or publishing in open access journals. Open access articles appear to be cited more and downloaded more, suggesting increased visibility.
How the Congressional Budget Office Assists Lawmakers
Open Access and Research Integrity Workshop Introduction - 2014
1. Open Access and Research
Integrity – An introduction
Saturday 2nd August
Joe McArthur - @Mcarthur_Joe
Assistant Director, Right to Research Coalition
Co-founder of the Open Access Button
3. Launched in Summer 2009.
Built around the Student Statement
on the Right to Research: access to
research is a student right
International alliance of 77 graduate &
undergraduate student organizations,
representing nearly 7 million students.
Our program areas include Education
and Advocacy
8. www.righttoresearch.org
Source: Research Information Network, “How researchers secure access to licensed content not immediately available to them,” December 2009
40% of
researchers can’t
access resources
they need on a
DAILY or WEEKLY
basis
16. www.righttoresearch.org
€ 15.234
Prices generated with Elsevier’s pricing tool, for an institutional subscription with more than 5 users for an
academic institution in Poland with less than 10,000. Pricing tool URL:
http://www.myelsevier.com/browse/product_details.jsp?productId=ELS_AG_BS-PRD-00942#
18. Average journal price in Health Sciences:
www.righttoresearch.org
Chemistry
= $4,450
Physics
= $3,893
Agriculture
= $1,441
= $1,482
Source: Library Journal 2013 Periodicals Pricing Survey
“The Winds of Change | Periodicals Price Survey 2013,” by Stephen Bosch and Kittie Henderson. Library Journal,
April 25, 2013: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/04/publishing/the-winds-of-change-periodicals-price-survey-2013
19. www.righttoresearch.org
Source: Library Journal 2013 Periodicals Pricing Survey
“The Winds of Change | Periodicals Price Survey 2013,” by Stephen Bosch and Kittie Henderson. Library Journal,
April 25, 2013: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/04/publishing/the-winds-of-change-periodicals-price-survey-2013
20. www.righttoresearch.org
-25%
25%
75%
125%
175%
225%
275%
325%
375%
425%
1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
%ChangeSince1986
Source: ARL Statistics 2010-11 Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C.
*Includes electronic resources from 1999-2000 onward.
Graph 2
Monograph and Serial Costs
in ARL Libraries, 1986-2011* Serial
Expenditures
(+402%)
Monograph
Expenditures
(+71%)
Monographs
Purchased
(10%)
21. Publishing obscure academic journals is
that rare thing in the media industry:
“a license to print money.”
www.righttoresearch.org
The Economist, “Open Sesame,” April 14, 2012: http://www.economist.com/node/21552574
25. www.righttoresearch.org
80%
of research is
publicly
funded
1 Academic Publishing: Survey of funders supports the benign Open Access outcome priced into shares,
HSBC Global Research, February 11, 2013:
https://www.research.hsbc.com/midas/Res/RDV?ao=20&key=RxArFbnG1P&n=360010.PDF
1
26. Shouldn’t our publishing system
what we entrust to distribute the
knowledge we work so hard to create
share our values?
www.righttoresearch.org
27. Shouldn’t our publishing system
what we entrust to distribute the
knowledge we work so hard to create
Increase our research’s integrity?
www.righttoresearch.org
28. As defined by the Budapest Open Access Initiative
Free, immediate online access
to scientific & scholarly articles
with full reuse rights
38. Conclusions
Overall, articles published OA appear to show a higher number of citations, though
the effect is small, and the data provided does not allow us to control for possible
confounding effects such as the posting of articles in repositories, the number and location
of authors, and the possibility that authors are selecting their ‘best’ papers to publish on OA
terms. Similarly, any effect of OA on the timing of citations appears to be small, and we have
not been able to control for possible changes such as increased awareness of the journal
on the part of both readers and authors. But although the impact on citations is small,
the impact of open access publication on HTML views and PDF downloads is large
and significant, suggesting increased visibility for the open access papers.
http://www.nature.com/press_releases/ncomms-report2014.pdf
39. Credit to Cameron Neylon for this. http://www.slideshare.net/CameronNeylon/network-enabled-research-the-
role-of-open-source-and-open-thinking
40. The Story of Jack Andraka
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSVjqtOj4oM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G55hlnSD1Ys
www.righttoresearch.org
43. What does Wikipedia have to say?
Adapted from Wikipedia on 01/08/2014 -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor#Validity_as_a_measure_of_importance
The impact factor is based on the arithmetic mean number of citations per paper,
yet citation counts follow a Bradford distribution (i.e., a power law distribution)
and therefore the arithmetic mean is a statistically inappropriate measure.[8] For
example, about 90% of Nature's 2004 impact factor was based on only a quarter
of its publications, and thus the importance of any one publication will be
different from, and in most cases less than, the overall number.[9]
…
It is important to note that impact factor is a journal metric and should not be
used to assess individual researchers or institutions.[15][16]
Mention my degree, research background. Talk about how 18 months ago I knew nothing about this topic.
Introduce the R2RC
Many IFMSA members are also members of R2RC
Why can’t you get access? You need a subscription! Ask the room if they’ve even not been able to access something.
Show this is a problem others have
Privilege universities can’t access it either
Thinking more broadly than the UK, what’s the global impact. Talk about the Open Access Button
These are someone the stories. Patients, Clinicians, Academics, Students, Librarians and teachers, all denied access to the research they need because of an archaic scholarly publishing system that is not fit for purpose.
What gone wrong is that journals are expensive
Who knows how expensive?
Explain the slide. Explain the basic way research is published
This all becomes crazier when you realise that 80% is publically funded.
Science is intrinsically open
So to summarise what I just said.
Mention the percentages
Highlight 3 points. Jack (reaching now audiences), reuse, and citations/downloads