SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Running Head: INTERNET NAVIGATION 1
INTERNET NAVIGATION PROJECT 7
Internet Navigation Project
Student Name
National University
Title of Paper Here
Physical Activity (Qualifiers: Gender Female)
1996
70.8 – 77.1%: Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, Utah,
Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota,
Vermont, New Hampshire, Hawaii, Massachusetts
77.2 – 79.8%: California, Alaska, Arizona, Texas, Wisconsin,
Illinois, Michigan, Florida, Virginia, New Jersey, Connecticut,
Rhode Island, Maine
79.9 – 83.9%: North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas,
Oklahoma, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, New
York, Pennsylvania, District of Columbia
84 – 89.9%: Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Ohio,
West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia,
Maryland, Delaware, Puerto Rico
2000
72.7 – 75.8%: Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Idaho, Montana,
Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, Michigan, Virginia, Vermont,
District of Columbia
75.9 – 78.5%: California, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota,
South Dakota, Wisconsin, Florida, Maine, New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania
78.6 – 82.3%: Arizona, Texas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa,
Missouri, Arkansas, Illinois, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina,
Maryland, New Jersey, New York,
82.4 – 86.7%: Delaware, West Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio,
Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Louisiana, Kansas,
Oklahoma, Puerto Rico
Physical Activity (Qualifiers: Age Group 18 - 24)
1996
65.4 – 70.4%: Washington, Oregon, Montana, Wyoming, Utah,
Colorado, South Dakota, Minnesota, New Jersey, Vermont,
Puerto Rico
70.5 – 75.7%: Idaho, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida,
Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Maine, Rhode Island,
Connecticut
75.8 – 80.2%: California, North Dakota, Kansas, Oklahoma,
Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Alabama, North Carolina,
New York, Delaware
80.3 – 85.9%: Arizona, Nebraska, Arkansas, Ohio, Kentucky,
Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina, West Virginia, Virginia,
Maryland
2000
62.6 – 69.2%: Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Wyoming, North
Dakota, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, District of Columbia
69.3 – 73.1%: California, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Colorado,
Michigan, Indiana, Arkansas, Alabama, New York, Vermont, ,
Massachusetts, New Jersey, Delaware
73.2 – 76.9%: Idaho, Arizona, New Mexico, South Dakota,
Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida,
South Carolina, West Virginia, Maryland, New Hampshire
77 – 82.9%: Puerto Rico, Nebraska, Kansas, Louisiana, Iowa,
Wisconsin, Minnesota, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, North
Carolina, Maine
BMI (Qualifiers: Gender Female)
1996
10.7 – 14.1%: Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Montana, Wyoming,
Colorado, South Dakota, Minnesota, Georgia, New Jersey, New
Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Hawaii
14.2 – 17.6%: Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, New
Mexico, North Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Florida,
Virginia, New York, Maine, Vermont
17.7 – 19.1%: Alaska, Puerto Rico, Texas, Iowa, Arkansas,
Wisconsin, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Tennessee, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland
19.2 -21.4%: Missouri, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, South Carolina, District of
Columbia
2000
14.2 – 17.1%: Nevada, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado,
Minnesota, Virginia, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode
Island, Denver
17.2 – 19.8%: Washington, California, Idaho, Utah, Arizona,
New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska,
Wisconsin, Florida, New York, New Jersey, Vermont
19.9 – 22.1%: Oregon, Alaska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa,
Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, Maine,
Pennsylvania, Maryland
22.2 – 26.3%: Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, South Carolina,
North Carolina, West Virginia, District of Columbia
BMI (Qualifiers: Age Group 18 - 24)
1996
3.7 – 6.8%: Idaho, Arizona, Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas,
Minnesota Mississippi, Indiana, Georgia, New Hampshire,
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico
6.9 – 8.1%: Washington, Oregon, Wyoming, New Mexico, South
Dakota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Tennessee,
Virginia, North Carolina, New Jersey, Connecticut
8.2 – 10.4%: California, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Texas,
Illinois, Florida, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode
Island, Delaware
10.5 – 17.4%: Alaska, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Iowa, Missouri,
Alabama, South Carolina, Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, West
Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Maine
2000
3.4 – 9.1%: Montana, Utah, Colorado, Minnesota, South
Carolina, Virginia, New York, Maryland, Delaware, New
Jersey, Rhode Island, District of Columbia
9.2 – 11.2%: Washington, California, Alaska, Nevada, Idaho,
Wyoming, South Dakota, Texas, Missouri, Florida, Puerto Rico,
Massachusetts, Connecticut
11.3 -12.8%: Hawaii, Arizona, New Mexico, North Dakota,
Nebraska, Kansas, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, West
Virginia, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Vermont
12.9 – 19.2%: Oregon, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Iowa,
Illinois, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, North
Carolina, New Hampshire, Maine
Internet Navigation Project
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) was used
to explore the years 1996 and 2000 on how physical activity
correlates with body mass index (BMI). In both topics physical
activity and BMI, the two qualifiers focused on the female
gender and the age group 18 to 24 years old. The physical
activity topic focused on adults whose response was no to
engaging in thirty minutes or more of moderate activity five or
more days per week. The BMI topic focused on weight
classification by BMI.
According to the BRFSS in 1996, thirty minutes of any
physical activity five or more days per week said the female
gender had a higher crude prevalence of 84 to 89.9 percent in
the southern states compared to the states in the west coast
region that had a lower crude prevalence between 77.8 to 77.1
percent. However, in 2000 there was an increase of states in the
central and southern region that had a higher crude prevalence
of 78.6 to 82.3 percent. The northwest states remained having a
low crude prevalence similar to the year 1996. In 2000 the
states that continued in the high crude prevalence similar to the
year 1996 were Oklahoma, Louisiana, Iowa, Alabama,
Kentucky, and Maine. Concentrating on the age group 18 to 24
year olds on physical activity in 1996, states in the east coast
had a higher crude prevalence of 80.3 to 85.9 percent. The
states that remained in this higher category in 2000 were
Nebraska, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Ohio.
Reviewing the BMI topic with a response of an obese BMI
of 30.0 to 99.8 in the female gender in the year 1996 the state in
the west coast had either a crude prevalence of 10.7 to 14.1
percent or 12.2 to 17.6 percent. The southern states and some
states in the east coast had a high crude prevalence of 17.7 to
19.1 percent or 19.2 to 21.4 percent. However, in 2000 there
was a drastic increase of states mainly in the southern area that
hit the higher crude prevalence percentage of 22.2 to 26.3.
These states included, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, North Carolina,
and West Virginia. In 2000, the west coast remained in the
lower crude prevalence percentage of 14.2 to 17.1 percent or
17.2 to 19.8 percent.
Comparing the physical activity data and BMI data there is
a comparison that show how states that do not stay physically
active have a higher BMI. Physical activity in 1996 based on
age group did not improve in the central states but increased in
2000. Along the same lines there is significant correlation
comparing the physical activity data to the BMI data that
focused on age. The BMI data displayed no improvement from
1996 to 2000 but an increase in the central states as well. The
south and east coast displayed a higher crude prevalence
percentage in physical activity in the age group of 18 to 24
years old and the female gender. This relates to the BMI data
that also illustrates the same pattern in the age group of 18 to
24 years old and the female gender. The BMI in 1996 has
increased in 2000 mainly in the south and east coast, similarly
to the physical activity data where those states have indicated
low physical activity.
Due to the increase in obesity in the United States there
has been many programs implemented to help this growing
epidemic. However, public health practitioners should focus on
promoting and educating exercise and physical activity. There
are programs already implemented that will help our future
generations such as the Let’s Move! campaign, a national
initiative launch by First Lady Michelle Obama on February 9,
2010 (Gibi, 2013). The campaign plays an important role to
putting children on the path to a healthy future by educating
people on the importance of supporting and practicing a healthy
lifestyle. The campaign aims to change an environment of a
community to ensure families have access to healthy and
affordable foods. A campaign that works toward stopping
obesity is very important because in the article Vital Signs:
Obesity Among Low-Income, Preschool-Ages Children – United
States, 2008-2011 mentioned, “overweight or obese
preschoolers are five times as likely to become overweight or
obese adults, compared with their normal eight peers. In older
children and adolescents, obesity is associated with high
cholesterol, high blood sugar, asthma and mental health
problems” (May et al., 2013, p. 633). The lack of physical
activity and poor diet is connected to the increase in BMI and
obesity. It is important for health practitioners to encourage a
healthy lifestyle by promoting healthy eating and physical
activity; the combination reduces an individual’s risk of
developing chronic diseases. The BRFSS data displays that the
lack of exercise does play a factor with the increase in BMI.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). BRFSS
Prevalence & Trends Data. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence/index.html
Gibi, K. (2013). Let’s Move! Cities, Towns and Counties. Parks
& Recreation, 48 (10), 37-39.
May, A. L., Liping, P., Sherry, B., Blanck, H. M., Galuska, D.,
Dalenius, K., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2013). Vital Signs:
Obesity Among Low-Income, Preschool-Aged Children --
United States, 2008-2011. MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality
Weekly Report, 62(31), 629-634.

More Related Content

Similar to Running Head INTERNET NAVIGATION1INTERNET NAVIGATION PROJECT.docx

Ada 0809 Inservice Short
Ada 0809 Inservice ShortAda 0809 Inservice Short
Ada 0809 Inservice Short
atfswfd
 
Open DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon Sessions
Open DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon SessionsOpen DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon Sessions
Open DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon Sessions
Michael Kerr
 
2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx
2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx
2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx
AmandaMood
 
Using Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from Scorecards
Using Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from ScorecardsUsing Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from Scorecards
Using Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from Scorecards
The Commonwealth Fund
 
1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx
1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx
1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx
herminaprocter
 
Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?
Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?
Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?
The Appalachia Funder's Network
 
Community AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docx
Community AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docxCommunity AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docx
Community AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docx
mccormicknadine86
 
Annual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan Witters
Annual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan WittersAnnual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan Witters
Annual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan Witters
HPCareer.Net / State of Wellness Inc.
 
EXSS 4200 Project
EXSS 4200 ProjectEXSS 4200 Project
EXSS 4200 Project
Maria Hartung
 
Higher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United States
Higher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United StatesHigher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United States
Higher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United States
acceptableratio68
 
Hau.youth risk
Hau.youth riskHau.youth risk
Hau.youth risk
boverton
 
Placemaking Conference: Healthy Communities
Placemaking Conference: Healthy CommunitiesPlacemaking Conference: Healthy Communities
Placemaking Conference: Healthy Communities
OU Institute for Quality Communities
 
Accountability For the Care We Provide
Accountability For the Care We ProvideAccountability For the Care We Provide
Accountability For the Care We Provide
CentralPAHEF
 
10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit
10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit
10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit
burnesscomm
 
Pp11b Adolescent Smoking
Pp11b Adolescent SmokingPp11b Adolescent Smoking
Pp11b Adolescent Smoking
Yawo Akrodou
 
Power point obesity
Power point obesityPower point obesity
Power point obesity
lgandh
 
Secretary Rod Bremby Presentation
Secretary Rod  Bremby  PresentationSecretary Rod  Bremby  Presentation
Secretary Rod Bremby Presentation
Lawrence Medical Managers
 
We Can Do More
We Can Do MoreWe Can Do More
We Can Do More
Brian Minton
 
Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys monroe county-2020
Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys  monroe county-2020Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys  monroe county-2020
Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys monroe county-2020
NellieWixom
 
Substance Abuse Shiawassee, Michigan
Substance Abuse Shiawassee, MichiganSubstance Abuse Shiawassee, Michigan
Substance Abuse Shiawassee, Michigan
recoveryrestart2
 

Similar to Running Head INTERNET NAVIGATION1INTERNET NAVIGATION PROJECT.docx (20)

Ada 0809 Inservice Short
Ada 0809 Inservice ShortAda 0809 Inservice Short
Ada 0809 Inservice Short
 
Open DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon Sessions
Open DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon SessionsOpen DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon Sessions
Open DataFest III - 3.14.16 - Day One Afternoon Sessions
 
2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx
2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx
2019-mj-kratom-ecigarette-presentation.pptx
 
Using Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from Scorecards
Using Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from ScorecardsUsing Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from Scorecards
Using Measurement to Improve Performance: Insights from Scorecards
 
1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx
1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx
1Running head OBESITY IN MIDWESTERN CHILDREN.docx
 
Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?
Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?
Gathering 2011 Breakout Sessions - Health - How Healthy is Appalachia?
 
Community AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docx
Community AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docxCommunity AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docx
Community AssessmentMaria PribeWalden University.docx
 
Annual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan Witters
Annual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan WittersAnnual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan Witters
Annual Gallup Well-Being Index Update with Dan Witters
 
EXSS 4200 Project
EXSS 4200 ProjectEXSS 4200 Project
EXSS 4200 Project
 
Higher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United States
Higher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United StatesHigher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United States
Higher Diabetes Incidence In Southeast United States
 
Hau.youth risk
Hau.youth riskHau.youth risk
Hau.youth risk
 
Placemaking Conference: Healthy Communities
Placemaking Conference: Healthy CommunitiesPlacemaking Conference: Healthy Communities
Placemaking Conference: Healthy Communities
 
Accountability For the Care We Provide
Accountability For the Care We ProvideAccountability For the Care We Provide
Accountability For the Care We Provide
 
10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit
10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit
10th Anniversary Northern Virginia Health Summit
 
Pp11b Adolescent Smoking
Pp11b Adolescent SmokingPp11b Adolescent Smoking
Pp11b Adolescent Smoking
 
Power point obesity
Power point obesityPower point obesity
Power point obesity
 
Secretary Rod Bremby Presentation
Secretary Rod  Bremby  PresentationSecretary Rod  Bremby  Presentation
Secretary Rod Bremby Presentation
 
We Can Do More
We Can Do MoreWe Can Do More
We Can Do More
 
Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys monroe county-2020
Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys  monroe county-2020Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys  monroe county-2020
Ppt 8 overweight obesity in nys monroe county-2020
 
Substance Abuse Shiawassee, Michigan
Substance Abuse Shiawassee, MichiganSubstance Abuse Shiawassee, Michigan
Substance Abuse Shiawassee, Michigan
 

More from wlynn1

Running head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS .docx
Running head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS                      .docxRunning head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS                      .docx
Running head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS .docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docx
Running head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docxRunning head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docx
Running head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docx
Running head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docxRunning head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docx
Running head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docxRunning head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL .docx
Running head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL         .docxRunning head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL         .docx
Running head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL .docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docx
Running head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docxRunning head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docx
Running head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docx
Running head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docxRunning head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docx
Running head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docxRunning head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head LOGISTIC REGRESSION .docx
Running head LOGISTIC REGRESSION                                 .docxRunning head LOGISTIC REGRESSION                                 .docx
Running head LOGISTIC REGRESSION .docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO .docx
Running head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO  .docxRunning head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO  .docx
Running head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO .docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MALWARE .docx
Running head MALWARE                                             .docxRunning head MALWARE                                             .docx
Running head MALWARE .docx
wlynn1
 
Running head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON .docx
Running head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON     .docxRunning head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON     .docx
Running head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON .docx
wlynn1
 
Running head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docx
Running head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docxRunning head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docx
Running head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docx
wlynn1
 
Running Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docx
Running Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docxRunning Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docx
Running Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docx
wlynn1
 
Running Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docx
Running Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docxRunning Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docx
Running Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docxRunning head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docx
Running head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docxRunning head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docx
Running head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docx
Running head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docxRunning head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docx
Running head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docx
wlynn1
 
Running Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docx
Running Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docxRunning Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docx
Running Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docx
wlynn1
 
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docxRunning head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docx
wlynn1
 

More from wlynn1 (20)

Running head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS .docx
Running head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS                      .docxRunning head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS                      .docx
Running head MARKETING ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS .docx
 
Running head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docx
Running head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docxRunning head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docx
Running head MANAGING A DIVERSE WORKFORCE1MANAGING A DIVERSE.docx
 
Running head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docx
Running head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docxRunning head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docx
Running head MANAGING TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION IN DIGITAL BUS.docx
 
Running head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docxRunning head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISING MANAGER 1MAN.docx
 
Running head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL .docx
Running head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL         .docxRunning head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL         .docx
Running head MANAGING DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS FINAL .docx
 
Running head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docx
Running head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docxRunning head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docx
Running head MANAGING DONUT FRANCHISES1MANAGING DONUT FRANCHIS.docx
 
Running head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docx
Running head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docxRunning head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docx
Running head MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS1MANAGEMENT DILEMMAS6.docx
 
Running head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docxRunning head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docx
Running head MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 1MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.docx
 
Running head LOGISTIC REGRESSION .docx
Running head LOGISTIC REGRESSION                                 .docxRunning head LOGISTIC REGRESSION                                 .docx
Running head LOGISTIC REGRESSION .docx
 
Running head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO .docx
Running head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO  .docxRunning head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO  .docx
Running head MANAGEMENT OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE THROUGH MO .docx
 
Running head MALWARE .docx
Running head MALWARE                                             .docxRunning head MALWARE                                             .docx
Running head MALWARE .docx
 
Running head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON .docx
Running head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON     .docxRunning head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON     .docx
Running head LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK BUDGETARY COMPARISON .docx
 
Running head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docx
Running head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docxRunning head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docx
Running head MAJOR PROJECT1MAJOR PROJECT9Initial Ou.docx
 
Running Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docx
Running Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docxRunning Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docx
Running Head MAJOR CONCERNS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHINA 1MAJO.docx
 
Running Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docx
Running Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docxRunning Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docx
Running Head LOGISTICS1Running Head LOGISTICS7.docx
 
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docxRunning head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 2Logic modelStu.docx
 
Running head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docx
Running head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docxRunning head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docx
Running head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docx
 
Running head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docx
Running head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docxRunning head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docx
Running head LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS1Living with Chroni.docx
 
Running Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docx
Running Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docxRunning Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docx
Running Head LITERATURE REVIEW2LITERATURE REVIEW 2.docx
 
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docxRunning head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docx
Running head LOGIC MODELLOGIC MODEL 4Situ.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brubPharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
danielkiash986
 
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumPhilippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
MJDuyan
 
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
Payaamvohra1
 
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapitolTechU
 
Skimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S Eliot
Skimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S EliotSkimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S Eliot
Skimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S Eliot
nitinpv4ai
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Standardized tool for Intelligence test.
Standardized tool for Intelligence test.Standardized tool for Intelligence test.
Standardized tool for Intelligence test.
deepaannamalai16
 
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptxContiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Kalna College
 
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
PsychoTech Services
 
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptxRESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
zuzanka
 
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdfCIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
blueshagoo1
 
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A  Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptLevel 3 NCEA - NZ: A  Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Henry Hollis
 
Information and Communication Technology in Education
Information and Communication Technology in EducationInformation and Communication Technology in Education
Information and Communication Technology in Education
MJDuyan
 
78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx
78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx
78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx
Kalna College
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
indexPub
 
220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology
220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology
220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology
Kalna College
 
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsA Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
Steve Thomason
 
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsxData Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Prof. Dr. K. Adisesha
 
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
EduSkills OECD
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brubPharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
Pharmaceutics Pharmaceuticals best of brub
 
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumPhilippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
 
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
 
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
 
Skimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S Eliot
Skimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S EliotSkimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S Eliot
Skimbleshanks-The-Railway-Cat by T S Eliot
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
 
Standardized tool for Intelligence test.
Standardized tool for Intelligence test.Standardized tool for Intelligence test.
Standardized tool for Intelligence test.
 
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptxContiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
 
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...
 
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptxRESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.pptx
 
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdfCIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
CIS 4200-02 Group 1 Final Project Report (1).pdf
 
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A  Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptLevel 3 NCEA - NZ: A  Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
 
Information and Communication Technology in Education
Information and Communication Technology in EducationInformation and Communication Technology in Education
Information and Communication Technology in Education
 
78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx
78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx
78 Microsoft-Publisher - Sirin Sultana Bora.pptx
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ ÔN TẬP VÀ PHÁT TRIỂN CÂU HỎI TRONG ĐỀ MINH HỌA THI TỐT NGHIỆP THPT ...
 
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
 
220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology
220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology
220711130097 Tulip Samanta Concept of Information and Communication Technology
 
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsA Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
 
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsxData Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
Data Structure using C by Dr. K Adisesha .ppsx
 
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...
 

Running Head INTERNET NAVIGATION1INTERNET NAVIGATION PROJECT.docx

  • 1. Running Head: INTERNET NAVIGATION 1 INTERNET NAVIGATION PROJECT 7 Internet Navigation Project Student Name National University Title of Paper Here
  • 2. Physical Activity (Qualifiers: Gender Female) 1996 70.8 – 77.1%: Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, Utah, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, Vermont, New Hampshire, Hawaii, Massachusetts 77.2 – 79.8%: California, Alaska, Arizona, Texas, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Florida, Virginia, New Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maine 79.9 – 83.9%: North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, New York, Pennsylvania, District of Columbia 84 – 89.9%: Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Ohio, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Maryland, Delaware, Puerto Rico 2000 72.7 – 75.8%: Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, Michigan, Virginia, Vermont, District of Columbia 75.9 – 78.5%: California, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Florida, Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania 78.6 – 82.3%: Arizona, Texas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Illinois, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, 82.4 – 86.7%: Delaware, West Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Louisiana, Kansas,
  • 3. Oklahoma, Puerto Rico Physical Activity (Qualifiers: Age Group 18 - 24) 1996 65.4 – 70.4%: Washington, Oregon, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, South Dakota, Minnesota, New Jersey, Vermont, Puerto Rico 70.5 – 75.7%: Idaho, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut 75.8 – 80.2%: California, North Dakota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Alabama, North Carolina, New York, Delaware 80.3 – 85.9%: Arizona, Nebraska, Arkansas, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland 2000 62.6 – 69.2%: Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Wyoming, North Dakota, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Rhode Island, Connecticut, District of Columbia 69.3 – 73.1%: California, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Colorado, Michigan, Indiana, Arkansas, Alabama, New York, Vermont, , Massachusetts, New Jersey, Delaware 73.2 – 76.9%: Idaho, Arizona, New Mexico, South Dakota, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, West Virginia, Maryland, New Hampshire
  • 4. 77 – 82.9%: Puerto Rico, Nebraska, Kansas, Louisiana, Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, North Carolina, Maine BMI (Qualifiers: Gender Female) 1996 10.7 – 14.1%: Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, South Dakota, Minnesota, Georgia, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Hawaii 14.2 – 17.6%: Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, New Mexico, North Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Florida, Virginia, New York, Maine, Vermont 17.7 – 19.1%: Alaska, Puerto Rico, Texas, Iowa, Arkansas, Wisconsin, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Tennessee, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland 19.2 -21.4%: Missouri, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, South Carolina, District of Columbia 2000 14.2 – 17.1%: Nevada, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Minnesota, Virginia, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Denver 17.2 – 19.8%: Washington, California, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Florida, New York, New Jersey, Vermont 19.9 – 22.1%: Oregon, Alaska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, Maine,
  • 5. Pennsylvania, Maryland 22.2 – 26.3%: Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, North Carolina, West Virginia, District of Columbia BMI (Qualifiers: Age Group 18 - 24) 1996 3.7 – 6.8%: Idaho, Arizona, Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota Mississippi, Indiana, Georgia, New Hampshire, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico 6.9 – 8.1%: Washington, Oregon, Wyoming, New Mexico, South Dakota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Tennessee, Virginia, North Carolina, New Jersey, Connecticut 8.2 – 10.4%: California, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Texas, Illinois, Florida, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware 10.5 – 17.4%: Alaska, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Iowa, Missouri, Alabama, South Carolina, Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Maine 2000 3.4 – 9.1%: Montana, Utah, Colorado, Minnesota, South Carolina, Virginia, New York, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, Rhode Island, District of Columbia 9.2 – 11.2%: Washington, California, Alaska, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, South Dakota, Texas, Missouri, Florida, Puerto Rico, Massachusetts, Connecticut
  • 6. 11.3 -12.8%: Hawaii, Arizona, New Mexico, North Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Vermont 12.9 – 19.2%: Oregon, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Iowa, Illinois, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Maine Internet Navigation Project The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) was used to explore the years 1996 and 2000 on how physical activity correlates with body mass index (BMI). In both topics physical activity and BMI, the two qualifiers focused on the female gender and the age group 18 to 24 years old. The physical activity topic focused on adults whose response was no to engaging in thirty minutes or more of moderate activity five or more days per week. The BMI topic focused on weight classification by BMI. According to the BRFSS in 1996, thirty minutes of any physical activity five or more days per week said the female gender had a higher crude prevalence of 84 to 89.9 percent in
  • 7. the southern states compared to the states in the west coast region that had a lower crude prevalence between 77.8 to 77.1 percent. However, in 2000 there was an increase of states in the central and southern region that had a higher crude prevalence of 78.6 to 82.3 percent. The northwest states remained having a low crude prevalence similar to the year 1996. In 2000 the states that continued in the high crude prevalence similar to the year 1996 were Oklahoma, Louisiana, Iowa, Alabama, Kentucky, and Maine. Concentrating on the age group 18 to 24 year olds on physical activity in 1996, states in the east coast had a higher crude prevalence of 80.3 to 85.9 percent. The states that remained in this higher category in 2000 were Nebraska, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Ohio. Reviewing the BMI topic with a response of an obese BMI of 30.0 to 99.8 in the female gender in the year 1996 the state in the west coast had either a crude prevalence of 10.7 to 14.1 percent or 12.2 to 17.6 percent. The southern states and some states in the east coast had a high crude prevalence of 17.7 to 19.1 percent or 19.2 to 21.4 percent. However, in 2000 there was a drastic increase of states mainly in the southern area that hit the higher crude prevalence percentage of 22.2 to 26.3. These states included, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina, North Carolina, and West Virginia. In 2000, the west coast remained in the lower crude prevalence percentage of 14.2 to 17.1 percent or 17.2 to 19.8 percent. Comparing the physical activity data and BMI data there is a comparison that show how states that do not stay physically active have a higher BMI. Physical activity in 1996 based on age group did not improve in the central states but increased in 2000. Along the same lines there is significant correlation comparing the physical activity data to the BMI data that focused on age. The BMI data displayed no improvement from 1996 to 2000 but an increase in the central states as well. The south and east coast displayed a higher crude prevalence percentage in physical activity in the age group of 18 to 24
  • 8. years old and the female gender. This relates to the BMI data that also illustrates the same pattern in the age group of 18 to 24 years old and the female gender. The BMI in 1996 has increased in 2000 mainly in the south and east coast, similarly to the physical activity data where those states have indicated low physical activity. Due to the increase in obesity in the United States there has been many programs implemented to help this growing epidemic. However, public health practitioners should focus on promoting and educating exercise and physical activity. There are programs already implemented that will help our future generations such as the Let’s Move! campaign, a national initiative launch by First Lady Michelle Obama on February 9, 2010 (Gibi, 2013). The campaign plays an important role to putting children on the path to a healthy future by educating people on the importance of supporting and practicing a healthy lifestyle. The campaign aims to change an environment of a community to ensure families have access to healthy and affordable foods. A campaign that works toward stopping obesity is very important because in the article Vital Signs: Obesity Among Low-Income, Preschool-Ages Children – United States, 2008-2011 mentioned, “overweight or obese preschoolers are five times as likely to become overweight or obese adults, compared with their normal eight peers. In older children and adolescents, obesity is associated with high cholesterol, high blood sugar, asthma and mental health problems” (May et al., 2013, p. 633). The lack of physical activity and poor diet is connected to the increase in BMI and obesity. It is important for health practitioners to encourage a healthy lifestyle by promoting healthy eating and physical activity; the combination reduces an individual’s risk of developing chronic diseases. The BRFSS data displays that the lack of exercise does play a factor with the increase in BMI.
  • 9. References Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). BRFSS Prevalence & Trends Data. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence/index.html Gibi, K. (2013). Let’s Move! Cities, Towns and Counties. Parks & Recreation, 48 (10), 37-39. May, A. L., Liping, P., Sherry, B., Blanck, H. M., Galuska, D., Dalenius, K., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2013). Vital Signs: Obesity Among Low-Income, Preschool-Aged Children -- United States, 2008-2011. MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 62(31), 629-634.