The document provides ratings for criteria on a project with scores ranging from poor to excellent. It rates criteria such as the picture, drawing, video, and website on a project on aspects like clarity, interpretation of topic, neatness, and use of data. Graphs are also rated on accurately displaying data and the title, quantity, and design of charts. The highest ratings are for elements that clearly relate to the topic, help interpretation, and use data from surveys on the lesson topic.

1. Ratings
Criteria Poor Fair Good Excellent Score
(25%) (50%) (75%) (100%)
The picture is
unclear,
Picture The picture is however The picture is The picture fits
(25 points) unclear and some clear and the topic well
cannot be interpretation adequate
and is easy to
interpreted can be however not
into the assessed into easily
understand,
specific topic the topic interpreted to and interpret
given. given, a topic. the topic
however very
difficult
The drawing
is unclear,
The drawing
Drawing messy, The drawing is The drawing is
is fairly clear,
(25 points) seems to be neat, has some neat, color is
however is
put together color and used, and can
very simple,
in a hurry attractive to be interpreted
and with little
and distorts the eye, despite
color, despite
the project, despite knowing
knowing
despite knowing before before hand
before hand
knowing hand the the difficulty
the difficulty
before hand difficulty of the of the drawing
of the
the difficulty drawing pad pad
drawing pad
of the
drawing pad
The video is
The video is clear, relates
Video The video is clear, relates to the topic,
The video is
(25 points) unclear and somewhat to can be found
clear and
seems to the topic, can on the web,
relates
have been be found on identifiable to
somewhat to
chosen at the the web, or is students, fun,
the topic
last minute identifiable to cartoonish,
students and singing or
music involved
The website is
clear,
Website navigable,
(25 points) The website The website is The website is understandable,
has nothing clear however clear,
and a
to do with the difficult to navigable, and
toipic understand understandable government,
law, or
university
website

2. Ratings
Poor Fair Good Excellent
Criteria (25%) (50%) (75%) (100%)
Graphs are
Graphs distort the
Graphs seriously adequate and do
data somewhat Graphs fit the
distort the data not distort the
Type of Graph and interpretation data well and
making data, but
(10 points) of the data is make it easy to
interpretation interpretation of
somewhat interpret
almost impossible the data is
difficult
somewhat difficult
Simple or
complex charts At least 1 simple
Quantity
______________ created, but not ____________ & 1 complex
(10 points)
an example of chart created
both
Title is creative
Title clearly
and clearly relates
relates to the
to the problem
problem being
Title A title is not being graphed
A title is present graphed (includes
(10 points) present (includes
dependent and
dependent and
independent
independent
variable)
variable)
Exceptionally
well designed,
neat, and
Neatness & Appears messy and Neat but the Neat and attractive. Colors
Attractiveness "thrown together" graphs appear relatively that go well
(10 points) in a hurry quite plain attractive together are used
to make the
graphs more
readable
No data included Some data Most data All data included
comes from survey included comes included comes comes from
Data
questions based on from survey from survey survey questions
(10 points)
TEKS topic of the questions based questions based on based on TEKS
Integrated Lesson on TEKS topic of TEKS topic of the topic of the

3. Plan the Integrated Integrated Lesson Integrated Lesson
Lesson Plan Plan Plan