Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to District Reporting Tool Demo Tracks School Health Progress
Similar to District Reporting Tool Demo Tracks School Health Progress (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
District Reporting Tool Demo Tracks School Health Progress
- 1. District Reporting Tool Insight and action through data demand and use Melinda Potgieter - Preuss 8 December 2014
- 2. Outline • Objectives of the DRT • “SEED” Model • Components/Features of the DRT • Dashboard • Enabling Environment • Intervention/Implementation Status Monitoring • District Reporting Tool Demo?
- 3. Objectives of the DRT - To assist in developing district profiles – “Know your district” To identify key bottlenecks - To identify possible solutions to bottlenecks - To identify key enablers & establish action plans across the continuum of care process - To track the district status of programme implementation using dashboards - To assist in coordination and integration of key MNCWH/ISHP areas through partnerships - To track or monitor implementation of the identified intervention stages over time
- 4. ‘SEED’ Model Supply Demand Meeting clients needs Staff supported in delivering quality services that are accessible, acceptable, and accountable to clients and communities served Individuals, families, and communities have knowledge and capacity to ensure School Health and seek care Enabling Environment Policy, program, and community environment, coupled with social and gender norms, support functioning health systems and facilitate healthy behaviours
- 5. F E U T U R E S / C O M P O N E N T Annually Bi-annually Quarterly Monthly When? What? Why? Data for action tool to identify i) Key challenges, ii) Action plans to overcome challenges and iii) Prioritize Establish enabling factors Monitor Resources Partners Dashboard to monitor key programme priorities Facility Integration Monitoring of Implementation Stages across key interventions on a 6-point scale Who?
- 6. Cover Page
- 7. Dashboard Green: the indicator has reached its target value. Yellow: the indicator has improved compared to the previous financial year, but has not yet reached its target value. Red: the indicator’s Performance 2012/13 (FY 1) has worsened compared to the previous financial quarter, and has not reached its target value. Green: Amber: Red Score 6 : 4 : 4 42%
- 8. Enabling Environment • Leadership and Governance • Policies, resources and budgets • Evidence-based programme decision-making • Commodities, supplies and equipment • Advocacy and communication • Transport • Integration and referrals
- 11. Resources • Human Resources • Capacity Building • Equipment • Transport Kwazulu - Natal Number of school health teams per district 9 12 12 12 14 43 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 eThekwini DM Zululand DM iLembe DM Uthukela DM Amajuba DM Umkhanyakude DM Uthungulu DM Ugu DM uMgungundlovu DM Total
- 12. Implementation Status Measurement – The overall status of the technical assistance is measured by getting an average of the stages across the continuum of care – The implementation stages can be summarised as follows: Pre-implementation Implementation Institutionalisation 1 Create awareness 2 Commitment to implement 3 Prepare to implement 4 Implementation 5 Integration into routine practise 6 Institutionalisation
- 14. Strengthening District Task Teams
- 16. Benefits • Establishment of priority interventions and action plans that are monitored • Identification of key enablers/inhibitors • Modular approach & dropdowns • Easy to update partly populated dashboards • Integration possible with other sources of data such as Census and Surveys • Clear evidence-based picture of – where you’ve been, – where you are, and – where you are going