The International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights and Taxation
Riyas vp
M.com(A&T)
Roll no: 13311040
Pondicherry
University
Taxation and international human
rights instruments
 The State’s sovereign right to tax tends to
interfere with the taxpayer’s right to the
enjoyment of his property.
 Democratic states must seek to reach a
balance between the state’s right to raise
taxes and the fundamental human rights of
taxpayers.
Legislative instruments to protect
the rights of taxpayers
 European Convention on Human Rights
 European Charter of Human Rights
 The International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights and Taxation
The International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights
 It was a United Nations Treaty based on
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
 Adopted and opened for signature on
December 19, 1966.
 It entered into force on March 23, 1976
Why International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights and
Taxation
 The Covenant binds State parties to create an
effective remedy to those persons who allege
a violation of their human rights.
 The Covenant specifies that a person claiming
such a remedy must be granted due access to
judicial authorities to seek redress
 They should be provided with adequate
avenues to enforce such remedies.
IMPORTANT ARTICLES
 ARTCLE 1 of the Covenant grants persons
the right to freely pursue their economic
development and vests them with the right to
freely dispose of their natural wealth and
resources
 It includes a saving clause that provides that
such a right is granted without prejudice to
obligations arising from international law.
 The Covenant adds that ‘In no case may a
people be deprived of its own means of
subsistence’.
ARTICLE 8
 This article provides that ‘no one shall be held
in slavery’ but it exclude ‘normal civil
obligations’.
 The article suggests that persons may be
forced to act collect taxes on account of the
government provided such services fall within
the definition of ‘normal civic obligations’.
ARTICLE 14
 Article vests persons with the right to a fair
hearing in determination of their rights and
obligations.
 No express rules are prescribed to disputes
over taxation matters but it is debatable
whether tax disputes not consisting in criminal
prosecutions constitute ‘a determination of a
person’s rights and obligations’ for the purpose
of this article.
ARTCLE 28
 It establishes a Human Rights Committee
consisting of eighteen nationals of the State
parties elected by secret ballot.
 The task of this Committee is that of hearing
complaints lodged by State parties relating to
alleged infringements of the Covenent
committed by other states.
ARTCLE 41
 It contemplates a framework whereby a state
party may take proceedings against another
State Party.
 If a State Party considers that another State
party is not giving effect to the Covenant it may
by written communication bring the matter to
the attention of the State party.
CNTD..
 If the matter is not adjusted to the satisfaction
of both States Parties within six months from
date of receipt of the official communication,
either State Party shall have the right to refer
the matter to the Human Rights Committee.
How Human Right Committee
deals..
 The Human Right Committee would deal with the
matter only after having ascertained that all
domestic remedies relating to the matter have
been invoked and exhausted.
 HRC has the right to seek to find a friendly
solution to the matter.
 If a solution is reached, the Committee issues a
brief report on the matter (such a report must
contain a statements of the facts in issue and of
the solution reached).
CNTD..
 When no solution is reached, the Committee
issues a report that includes a brief statement
of facts, written submissions and record of the
oral submissions. In every case the report is
communicated to the state parties concerned.
 Article 42 HRC provides for the possibility of
an ad hoc Conciliation Commission if the
matter is not resolved to the satisfaction of the
state parties concerned.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Taxation

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Taxation

  • 1.
    The International Covenanton Civil and Political Rights and Taxation Riyas vp M.com(A&T) Roll no: 13311040 Pondicherry University
  • 2.
    Taxation and internationalhuman rights instruments  The State’s sovereign right to tax tends to interfere with the taxpayer’s right to the enjoyment of his property.  Democratic states must seek to reach a balance between the state’s right to raise taxes and the fundamental human rights of taxpayers.
  • 3.
    Legislative instruments toprotect the rights of taxpayers  European Convention on Human Rights  European Charter of Human Rights  The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Taxation
  • 4.
    The International Covenanton Civil and Political Rights  It was a United Nations Treaty based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.  Adopted and opened for signature on December 19, 1966.  It entered into force on March 23, 1976
  • 5.
    Why International Covenanton Civil and Political Rights and Taxation  The Covenant binds State parties to create an effective remedy to those persons who allege a violation of their human rights.  The Covenant specifies that a person claiming such a remedy must be granted due access to judicial authorities to seek redress  They should be provided with adequate avenues to enforce such remedies.
  • 6.
    IMPORTANT ARTICLES  ARTCLE1 of the Covenant grants persons the right to freely pursue their economic development and vests them with the right to freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources  It includes a saving clause that provides that such a right is granted without prejudice to obligations arising from international law.  The Covenant adds that ‘In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence’.
  • 7.
    ARTICLE 8  Thisarticle provides that ‘no one shall be held in slavery’ but it exclude ‘normal civil obligations’.  The article suggests that persons may be forced to act collect taxes on account of the government provided such services fall within the definition of ‘normal civic obligations’.
  • 8.
    ARTICLE 14  Articlevests persons with the right to a fair hearing in determination of their rights and obligations.  No express rules are prescribed to disputes over taxation matters but it is debatable whether tax disputes not consisting in criminal prosecutions constitute ‘a determination of a person’s rights and obligations’ for the purpose of this article.
  • 9.
    ARTCLE 28  Itestablishes a Human Rights Committee consisting of eighteen nationals of the State parties elected by secret ballot.  The task of this Committee is that of hearing complaints lodged by State parties relating to alleged infringements of the Covenent committed by other states.
  • 10.
    ARTCLE 41  Itcontemplates a framework whereby a state party may take proceedings against another State Party.  If a State Party considers that another State party is not giving effect to the Covenant it may by written communication bring the matter to the attention of the State party.
  • 11.
    CNTD..  If thematter is not adjusted to the satisfaction of both States Parties within six months from date of receipt of the official communication, either State Party shall have the right to refer the matter to the Human Rights Committee.
  • 12.
    How Human RightCommittee deals..  The Human Right Committee would deal with the matter only after having ascertained that all domestic remedies relating to the matter have been invoked and exhausted.  HRC has the right to seek to find a friendly solution to the matter.  If a solution is reached, the Committee issues a brief report on the matter (such a report must contain a statements of the facts in issue and of the solution reached).
  • 13.
    CNTD..  When nosolution is reached, the Committee issues a report that includes a brief statement of facts, written submissions and record of the oral submissions. In every case the report is communicated to the state parties concerned.  Article 42 HRC provides for the possibility of an ad hoc Conciliation Commission if the matter is not resolved to the satisfaction of the state parties concerned.