Revised 2015 .docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•5 views
Revised 2015 EEX2000 Master Syllabus /7 Description: Keeping current in the reading of educational literature is a requirement for continuous improvement of teachers. Directions: Select a peer reviewed article from an education journal that discusses an issue of interest in the field of special education. The article should have been written within the last five years. The article should consist of a minimum of three pages. 1. Write a summary of the article. Citations from the article and your textbook must be included. 2. Write an opinion of the article’s viewpoint. Using citations include how the article relates to our readings and discussions in EEX 2000. 3. Your article summary and review should not be longer than four pages. 4. Attach a PDF copy of the article with your review Article is current and relevant to coursework (15%) Insufficient evidence to evaluate Article is not relevant or published w/n the past five years (1 pt) Article is relevant but not published w/n the past five years (7.5 pts) Article is relevant to coursework and published w/n the past five years (15 pts) Summary is thorough stating/discussing main ideas of article, citations from article/text included (25%) Insufficient evidence to evaluate Summary is brief and contains one citation from article/text (1 pt) Summary discusses main ideas of article and includes a maximum of 2 citations from article/text included (12.5 pts) Summary is thorough and detailed and includes a minimum of 3 citations from article/text included (25 pts) Reflections/Opinions have been presented with supported details from readings (25%) Insufficient evidence to evaluate An opinion has been stated in the reflection section but is not supported using citations from article/text (1 pt) Opinion(s) are evident in the reflection section but supported with a maximum of 2 citations from article/text (12.5 pts) Opinion(s) have been presented in the reflection section and supported with a minimum of 3 citations from article/text (25 pts) Review has been written in APA style (15%) Insufficient evidence to evaluate APA style citations are not evident throughout the assignment (1 pt) APA style citations have been attempted throughout the assignment (7.5 pts) Citations have been written in APA format correctly throughout the assignment (15 pts) Mechanics (20%) More than 4 errors in composition, and/or spelling are evident A maximum of 4 errors in grammar, composition, and spelling, are evident (1 pt) A maximum of 2 errors grammar, composition, and/or spelling, are evident (10 pts) No major errors in grammar, composition and/or spelling, are evident (20 pts) Disability Research Paper Description: Education students must know how to write effectiv ...
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraph.docx
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraphs (450- 500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook.
Topic: Heart Failure
ML is a retired registered nurse (RN) who has been given the diagnosis of Stage A heart failure. She knows from her RN education that she will definitely be placed on digoxin as a therapy. She remembers something about halos as something to be attuned to.
Explain the pathophysiology of Stage A heart failure.
What is the rational drug choice for treatment of this individual?
Address the patient’s concern about halos should digoxin be prescribed.
Are there gender considerations related to medication treatment in this scenario? If so, what are they? For example, do men and women differ in their side effect profile and/or complications (for instance, from digoxin)?
Discuss monitoring of the pharmacological agent(s) selected.
RUBRIC:
ote:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements..
Disability Research PaperDescription Education students mus.docx
Disability Research Paper
Description:
Education students must know how to write effective research papers using APA style.
Directions:
You will research and write a three to four page research paper discussing a specific special education disability. You will be assigned a specific disability to research. Use no fewer than three varied references to research information concerning the etiology, behavioral characteristics, historical aspects, and educational implications of the disability. Citations should be made utilizing American Psychological Association (APA) format. A reference page must be included in the paper.
TOPIC: Emotional and/or behavioral disorders
No Evidence
(0 pts)
Emerging
(5 pts)
Developing
(10 pts)
Mastered
(20 pts)
Disorder
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of information defining the disorder, etiology; there is a lack of a description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder.
Developing performance is evidenced by a brief definition of the disorder, etiology; including a brief description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder.
Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed definition of the disorder, etiology; including a detailed description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder.
Awareness Discussion
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of discussion on educational implications
Developing performance is evidenced by a brief discussion on educational implications
Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed discussion on educational implications
Instruction
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of discussion of the historical aspects
Developing performance is evidenced by a brief discussion of the historical aspects
Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed discussion of the historical aspects.
Review has been written in APA style
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
APA style citations are not evident throughout the assignment. Lacks three peer reviewed citations;
less than 2 content pages plus cover, and references.
APA style citations have been attempted throughout the assignment. Lacks three peer reviewed citations
less than 3 content pages plus cover, and references.
Citations have been written in APA format correctly throughout the assignment. Three or more peer reviewed citations
3 or more content pages plus cover, and references.
Composition, Grammar, and Spelling
More than 4 errors in composition, and/or spelling are evident.
Emerging performance is evidenced by no more than 4 errors in composition, grammar, and spelling.
Developing performance is evidenced by a no more than 3 errors in composition, grammar, and spelling.
Mastered performance is evidenced by no major errors in composition, grammar, and spelling.
.
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown) He.docx
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown)
Here is the book I want to reference. Clicking on the quote marks to the right of the listing will give me the referencing options
To format list with a Hanging Indent, highlight the entries and press Control_T.
Before:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and
Welfare.
After:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health
and Welfare.
To alphabetise your Reference List, highlight the full list and click the sort icon on Word.
J J Murphy | 2018
Copy and paste the reference into your
Reference List. CHECK that the listing is
correct using the Murdoch APA
Referencing Guide.
NR512
HealthIT Topic of Week Assignment
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
This assignment is designed to help students
Develop an appreciation for informatics, basic skills and knowledge required in practice settings. Students will select a “hot” or popular topic of particular interest to their practice to discuss. The topic will be selected from the website using the link provided in the course Assignments section.
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5.
Total Points Possible: 175
Requirements
Students will login to FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT using the link provided in the reading assignment module for Week 5 and select a “current/popular” topic of the week that may impact their practice. Students, in a professionally developed paper, will discuss the rationale for choosing the topic, how it will impact practice in a positive or negative manner, citing pros and cons. Include a discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. In the conclusion, provide recommendations for the future. Submit completed FierceHealthIT Topic paper for Wk. 5 to dropbox by end of Week 5. Preparing the paper
1. The FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT Current/Popular Topic of the Week assignment must be a professional, scholarly prepared paper. See the guidelines for writing a professional, scholarly paper in the Course Resources. The professional paper will have an introduction, body of paper to explain what you are doing, summary/conclusion, and at least three scholarly references.
2. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside of course readings.
3. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition.
4. The paper (excluding the title page, introduction and reference page) is 4-6 pages in length.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Gr.
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) usi.docx
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook. (Do not use lay press Internet sites).
Include the following in your initial post:
Explanation of the pathophysiology of the diagnosis.
Description of the drug category: Overview of use/action.
Analysis of the specific agents:
Pharmacokinetics/pharmacotherapeutics, adverse drug reactions, interactions, monitoring, patient education
Please choose two diagnoses from the following list:
Migraine
Seizure Disorder
Alzheimer’s Disease
Bell’s Palsy
Insomnia
For each of the two diagnoses you choose, select two drug categories used for treatment.
For each of the two drug categories, choose two specific pharmacological agents.
Course Text book :
Woo, Terri Moser and Robinson, Marylou V. (2020).
Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers
. (5th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate pr.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplaryExce.docx
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Quality of Initial Post
Provides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support important points.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
Peer Response Post
Offers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post (minimum of two).
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Partially followed instructions regarding number of reply posts.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Post is primarily a summation of peer’s post without further synthesis of course content.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
Did not follow instructions regarding number of reply posts.
Missing reference from both peer posts.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
Frequency of Distribution
Initial post and two peer posts made on three separate days.
All instruction requirements noted.
10 points
Initial post and two peer posts made on two separat ...
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
Addison's disease
You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, additional references should be scholarly based and be a new source that you are introducing to your peers.
Research and present the pathophysiology of the chosen disorder in a clear, well referenced manner.
Your initial post should also include the following:
The most common presenting symptoms
The manner in which your disorder is routinely diagnosed
A standard treatment plan
Link(s) to routine screening and treatment guidelines
If national screening and treatment guidelines do not exist for your disorder, choose a set of guidelines related to disorders that have been discussed in previous weeks. This is a great way for everyone to build a library of guidelines to help with their academic journey.
There is an abundance of information available on these disorders; in your research, look for the nuggets of information that are not common knowledge, or something specific that surprised you when you were researching your topic.
Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several inst.
Performing health assessments as an APRN will help you to develo
Performing health assessments as an APRN will help you to develop a collaborative partnership with your patients. After reading Chapter 4 and 12 in your Pender text, think about the vulnerable population that you choose during Week 1 - consider what you perceive / know about this group in relation to the following topics:
Health assets
Health problems
Health-related lifestyle strengths
Key health-related beliefs
Health behaviors that put the person at risk
Changes that could improve their quality of life
Now consider the pros and cons of implementing a Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project with the vulnerable group. You should consider not only the benefit of the actions but the active role the vulnerable will play in the development and implementation of the health promotion plan. How does your population’s health disparities and health inequities benefit and/or hinder this type of project’s success? Remember that you should include citations/references from at least three scholarly sources.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post ...
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week.docx
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the
Week 6: Case Study Choice
. Please summarize the case and discuss the questions that are asked with the case study presentation. Although it is not specifically asked, make sure that you are including aspects of immobility from Chapter 25 within the answers to the questions, and drawing ABGs on your patient, relaying the results (note you will need to make up what would be considered appropriate ABG results based on this case), and what those results mean in relation to your case study.
The case study I picked is : Cystic Fibrosis
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a m.
Recommended
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraph.docx
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraphs (450- 500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook.
Topic: Heart Failure
ML is a retired registered nurse (RN) who has been given the diagnosis of Stage A heart failure. She knows from her RN education that she will definitely be placed on digoxin as a therapy. She remembers something about halos as something to be attuned to.
Explain the pathophysiology of Stage A heart failure.
What is the rational drug choice for treatment of this individual?
Address the patient’s concern about halos should digoxin be prescribed.
Are there gender considerations related to medication treatment in this scenario? If so, what are they? For example, do men and women differ in their side effect profile and/or complications (for instance, from digoxin)?
Discuss monitoring of the pharmacological agent(s) selected.
RUBRIC:
ote:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements..
Disability Research PaperDescription Education students mus.docx
Disability Research Paper
Description:
Education students must know how to write effective research papers using APA style.
Directions:
You will research and write a three to four page research paper discussing a specific special education disability. You will be assigned a specific disability to research. Use no fewer than three varied references to research information concerning the etiology, behavioral characteristics, historical aspects, and educational implications of the disability. Citations should be made utilizing American Psychological Association (APA) format. A reference page must be included in the paper.
TOPIC: Emotional and/or behavioral disorders
No Evidence
(0 pts)
Emerging
(5 pts)
Developing
(10 pts)
Mastered
(20 pts)
Disorder
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of information defining the disorder, etiology; there is a lack of a description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder.
Developing performance is evidenced by a brief definition of the disorder, etiology; including a brief description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder.
Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed definition of the disorder, etiology; including a detailed description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder.
Awareness Discussion
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of discussion on educational implications
Developing performance is evidenced by a brief discussion on educational implications
Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed discussion on educational implications
Instruction
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of discussion of the historical aspects
Developing performance is evidenced by a brief discussion of the historical aspects
Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed discussion of the historical aspects.
Review has been written in APA style
Insufficient evidence to evaluate
APA style citations are not evident throughout the assignment. Lacks three peer reviewed citations;
less than 2 content pages plus cover, and references.
APA style citations have been attempted throughout the assignment. Lacks three peer reviewed citations
less than 3 content pages plus cover, and references.
Citations have been written in APA format correctly throughout the assignment. Three or more peer reviewed citations
3 or more content pages plus cover, and references.
Composition, Grammar, and Spelling
More than 4 errors in composition, and/or spelling are evident.
Emerging performance is evidenced by no more than 4 errors in composition, grammar, and spelling.
Developing performance is evidenced by a no more than 3 errors in composition, grammar, and spelling.
Mastered performance is evidenced by no major errors in composition, grammar, and spelling.
.
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown) He.docx
Referencing using Murdoch’s Library Listing (APA shown)
Here is the book I want to reference. Clicking on the quote marks to the right of the listing will give me the referencing options
To format list with a Hanging Indent, highlight the entries and press Control_T.
Before:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and
Welfare.
After:
Eldridge, D. E., Quee, M., & Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing:
Development of a children's headline indicator : Information paper. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health
and Welfare.
To alphabetise your Reference List, highlight the full list and click the sort icon on Word.
J J Murphy | 2018
Copy and paste the reference into your
Reference List. CHECK that the listing is
correct using the Murdoch APA
Referencing Guide.
NR512
HealthIT Topic of Week Assignment
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
This assignment is designed to help students
Develop an appreciation for informatics, basic skills and knowledge required in practice settings. Students will select a “hot” or popular topic of particular interest to their practice to discuss. The topic will be selected from the website using the link provided in the course Assignments section.
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5.
Total Points Possible: 175
Requirements
Students will login to FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT using the link provided in the reading assignment module for Week 5 and select a “current/popular” topic of the week that may impact their practice. Students, in a professionally developed paper, will discuss the rationale for choosing the topic, how it will impact practice in a positive or negative manner, citing pros and cons. Include a discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. In the conclusion, provide recommendations for the future. Submit completed FierceHealthIT Topic paper for Wk. 5 to dropbox by end of Week 5. Preparing the paper
1. The FierceEMR and FierceHealthIT Current/Popular Topic of the Week assignment must be a professional, scholarly prepared paper. See the guidelines for writing a professional, scholarly paper in the Course Resources. The professional paper will have an introduction, body of paper to explain what you are doing, summary/conclusion, and at least three scholarly references.
2. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside of course readings.
3. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition.
4. The paper (excluding the title page, introduction and reference page) is 4-6 pages in length.
5. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
6. Gr.
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) usi.docx
Write two to three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook. (Do not use lay press Internet sites).
Include the following in your initial post:
Explanation of the pathophysiology of the diagnosis.
Description of the drug category: Overview of use/action.
Analysis of the specific agents:
Pharmacokinetics/pharmacotherapeutics, adverse drug reactions, interactions, monitoring, patient education
Please choose two diagnoses from the following list:
Migraine
Seizure Disorder
Alzheimer’s Disease
Bell’s Palsy
Insomnia
For each of the two diagnoses you choose, select two drug categories used for treatment.
For each of the two drug categories, choose two specific pharmacological agents.
Course Text book :
Woo, Terri Moser and Robinson, Marylou V. (2020).
Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers
. (5th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate pr.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplaryExce.docx
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Quality of Initial Post
Provides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support important points.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
Peer Response Post
Offers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post (minimum of two).
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Partially followed instructions regarding number of reply posts.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Post is primarily a summation of peer’s post without further synthesis of course content.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
Did not follow instructions regarding number of reply posts.
Missing reference from both peer posts.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
Frequency of Distribution
Initial post and two peer posts made on three separate days.
All instruction requirements noted.
10 points
Initial post and two peer posts made on two separat ...
Addisons diseaseYou may use the textbook as one reference a.docx
Addison's disease
You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, additional references should be scholarly based and be a new source that you are introducing to your peers.
Research and present the pathophysiology of the chosen disorder in a clear, well referenced manner.
Your initial post should also include the following:
The most common presenting symptoms
The manner in which your disorder is routinely diagnosed
A standard treatment plan
Link(s) to routine screening and treatment guidelines
If national screening and treatment guidelines do not exist for your disorder, choose a set of guidelines related to disorders that have been discussed in previous weeks. This is a great way for everyone to build a library of guidelines to help with their academic journey.
There is an abundance of information available on these disorders; in your research, look for the nuggets of information that are not common knowledge, or something specific that surprised you when you were researching your topic.
Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several inst.
Performing health assessments as an APRN will help you to develo
Performing health assessments as an APRN will help you to develop a collaborative partnership with your patients. After reading Chapter 4 and 12 in your Pender text, think about the vulnerable population that you choose during Week 1 - consider what you perceive / know about this group in relation to the following topics:
Health assets
Health problems
Health-related lifestyle strengths
Key health-related beliefs
Health behaviors that put the person at risk
Changes that could improve their quality of life
Now consider the pros and cons of implementing a Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project with the vulnerable group. You should consider not only the benefit of the actions but the active role the vulnerable will play in the development and implementation of the health promotion plan. How does your population’s health disparities and health inequities benefit and/or hinder this type of project’s success? Remember that you should include citations/references from at least three scholarly sources.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post ...
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week.docx
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the
Week 6: Case Study Choice
. Please summarize the case and discuss the questions that are asked with the case study presentation. Although it is not specifically asked, make sure that you are including aspects of immobility from Chapter 25 within the answers to the questions, and drawing ABGs on your patient, relaying the results (note you will need to make up what would be considered appropriate ABG results based on this case), and what those results mean in relation to your case study.
The case study I picked is : Cystic Fibrosis
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a m.
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripheral systems
What challenges might you anticipate in completing this assessment?
What differences might you anticipate when assessing patients across the lifespan?
Share findings from scholarly resources that help in the performance of this assessment.
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Schol ...
Focus System - HEENT NECKReflect on the focus area or syste.docx
Focus System - HEENT /NECK
Reflect on the focus area or system(s) for the week.
What challenges might you anticipate in completing this assessment?
What differences might you anticipate when assessing patients across the lifespan?
Share findings from scholarly resources that help in the performance of this assessment.
Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference sup.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Students
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to students.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Parents
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to parents.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
15.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Teachers
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to teachers.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Informing Personal Classroom Management System
Does not include ways in which this informs a personal classroom management system.
Analysis of the implications of legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents for classroom management is sketchy and lacks depth of insight.
Essay contains an analysis of how legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents inform a personal classroom management system.
Analysis is clear and concisely presented.
Analysis draws specific conclusions about how these implications affect the student's personal classroom management system.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is in part or wholly incoherent.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Argument is strong, showing logical progressions. Firm control of the technique of argumentation is evident. Smooth progression of claims
The argument presents a clear, convincing and persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction,.
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic : Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what physiological effects this could have. Provide an example of a patient in which you might check these labs, perform a test, given an injection etc. and how the results or your new knowledge would or could affect your plan of care?
The topic come from Chapter 24 of your text. You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, you must also locate a scholarly article related to your aging discussion question. Your question should be stated in your initial discussion post and answered based on pathophysiological principles and specifically those related to aging. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
RUBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides add ...
Top of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft.
Name of the Draft’s Author:
Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Summary
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space.
Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criteria. Then use the right hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score.
Topic 7 Rubric: Persuasive Essay: Final Draft
Criteria
1
Unsatisfactory
2
Less Than Satisfactory
3
Satisfactory
4
Good
5
Excellent
Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/examples do you have for this score?
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content – 70%
Objective Perspective and Position
Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own.
Appropriately identifies one’s own position on the topic. Vague explanation of the position is given. Little reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position completely appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Appropriately identifies one’s position on the topic. Explains the position taken in a coherent way. Sound reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position mostly appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Clearly explains the position taken. Sound and detailed reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position appeals mostly to reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Comprehensively explains the position taken. Specific issues related to the topic are fully presented in great detail. Position appeals to reason.
Rationale for score:
Word Count
Word count is less than half the minimum or more than double the maximum.
Body of essay is more than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is more than 50 but less than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is over or under the word count by 50 words or less.
Within the appropriate word count.
Ra ...
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Levels of prevention
(primary prevention is most important in adult learning). Review the five levels of prevention and then focus on primary prevention. Offer three innovative ways in which to engage the adult population.
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Part.
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docx
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screening and prevention and how they could pertain to John.
Choose two of the following questions to answer as part of your initial post.
What events in John's life created a "downward spiral" into homelessness and hopelessness? Which events were related to social needs, mental health needs, and medical needs, and which could health care have addressed?
What were some of the barriers John faced in accessing medical care and mental health care?
How does homelessness and mental illness intersect? Do you believe homelessness may develop because of a mental health issue, or do you believe those who become homeless eventually sink into psychological despair?
The tipping point for many people who live at the margins of society may be things that could have been managed given the right support. How can your role as an APRN help identify, alleviate, or support those who are in need like John?
In your own experience, have you encountered a homeless individual? What was that like? Do you recall what you were thinking?
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understandin.
Performance Management and Training Scoring GuideCRITERIA NO.docx
Performance Management and Training Scoring Guide
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Describe the performance management system currently in place.
Does not identify the performance management system currently in place.
Identifies but does not describe the performance management system currently in place.
Describes the performance management system currently in place.
Analyzes the performance management system currently in place for its effectiveness using relevant organizational examples.
Explain the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Does not identify the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Identifies but does not explain the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Explains the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Analyzes the formal and informal performance feedback processes and summarizes possible process improvements for the organization.
Analyze best practices to improve employee performance.
Does not describe best practices to improve employee performance.
Describes but does not analyze best practices to improve employee performance.
Analyzes best practices to improve employee performance.
Analyzes best practices to improve employee performance and cites resources to support the analysis.
Analyze the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Does not describe the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Describes but does not analyze the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Analyzes the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Analyzes the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals and uses organizational examples or resources to support the analysis.
Explain how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Does not identify how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Identifies but does not explain how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Explains how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Analyzes how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation with supported rationale.
Write in a professional style using APA citations and format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Does not write in a professional style using APA citations and format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Inconsistently writes using APA citations and format and use of grammar, usage, and mechanics are inconsistent.
Writes in a professional style using APA citations and format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Writes exceptionally and in a professional style using APA citations and format, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics that are error free.
Criteria
Un ...
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations. Please read the following scenario and for your initial post; be sure to address all the questions posed by the scenario and include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Patient #1
: Two five-year-old girls are on your schedule for a kindergarten physical. The foster parent of one of the children indicates she received all her immunization from birth to one year of age, but after that the child has not had any further vaccines. The second child appears to have been vaccinated per the CDC schedule.
Is there a difference in the immunization plan you will initiate today for these two patients? Why or why not?
What immunizations will you be ordering for each of these two patients today?
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the convers.
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable population group that you choose during Week 1 for your paper. Select one of the following topics and respond to the thread corresponding to the question/discussion, utilizing at least three scholarly references to support your post. As a class, please make sure that all topics are addressed.
Analyze how you could motivate the vulnerable population that you chose in Week 1 ( Transgender) to make changes What is your primary health concern for this group and what theory might you utilize to encourage them to make behavior changes?
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported ...
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
Final Project (Week Eight)Required Elements of Final Projec.docx
Final Project: (Week Eight)
Required Elements of Final Project:
·
Research in more detail the topics in weeks four through eight.
·
Write on the following theme:
“The twentieth century leader’s job was about moving goods while the twenty-first century leader is about moving people.”
·
Provide anexplanation of the difference between the business landscapes of the two centuries as well as the differences between the leadership skills that the landscapes dictate.
·
The discussion of leadership differences should include the idea of how the roles of leader and manager have separated between the centuries and why the new leadership skills (discussed in weeks four through eight) must interface with people centric skills of the leader.
Required Formatting of Final Project:
This paper should be double-spaced, 12-point font, and five to seven pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;
Title page;
Introductory paragraph and a summary paragraph;
Use headings;
Write in the third person;
Use at least four sources from the course material and four additional sources from your research;
Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a reference page.
You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;
Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Written Assignment (30%)
Criteria
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions
shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions
shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion
shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions
lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims
arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts
arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts
arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material
arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the .
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741
Course Project: Part 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Analysis
13 to 14 points
The analysis thoroughly interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
12 points
The analysis partially interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
1 to 11 points
The analysis attempts of some aspects of analysis and interpretation of journal articles in a limited way. The review is more descriptive than analytical.
0 points
Not present
Use of Evidence and Relevant Outside Information
13 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with relevant facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is often incorporated into the analysis.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally supported with relevant facts, arguments, and details. Information outside the subject articles is occasionally incorporated into the analysis.
1 to 10 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with some facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is incorporated in a limited way into the analysis.
0 points
Not present
Organization and Development
13 points
The analysis is quite well-reasoned, indicating substantial breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is thorough and meaningful.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally well-reasoned, indicating some breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is generally sound.
1 to 10 points
The analysis has limited reasoning, indicating a surface understanding of the articles. The summary of each article is limited.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
13 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropriate Scripture references, course requirements, and application.
11 to 12 points
A biblical worldview perspective is articulated but is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and somewhat applies to course requirements and application.
1 to 10 points
A biblical worldview perspective is poorly articulated and is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and does not apply to course requirements and application.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Grammar and Spelling
6 points
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
5 points
There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
1 to 4 points
There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 points
There are more than 10 errors in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
Sentence Structure and Mechanics
6 points
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in lengt.
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docx
Top of Form
Benchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Framework for Leadership
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Selection of Book About a Leader Who Chose Leadership as a Vocation
Does not select a book about a leader or provide an explanation as to why that person chose leadership as a vocation.
Selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents a selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the selection and explanation. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Theoretical Framework, Style, and Leadership Traits present in the Work 2.1: Analyze theories of leadership and motivation in order to inspire followership.
Does not examine the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation.
Examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents an examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the examination. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Qualities and Shortcomings of the Selected Leader
Does not ...
Review the following treatments and rationale. Do you agree or disa.docx
Review the following treatments and rationale. Do you agree or disagree? Why? What information from this week’s content or outside information can you cite to support your opinions?
The purpose of this discussion is to recommend two resources that should be provided for a 15 year old male newly diagnosed with Type II diabetes. Unfortunately, chronic diagnoses such as diabetes have the potential to cause mental health issues in teenagers. Developmentally, they want to be like their peers and fit in to a group. It has been studied that rates of depression in teenagers with diabetes can range from 8% to 22% (“Behavioral health and diabetes,” 2021). In my opinion, there are two reasons why this patient feels depressed. First, they may not have basic knowledge about their disease and how their life is going to change. Thus, the patient should be referred to a diabetes educator as recommended by the American Diabetes Association. This resource can help a patient increase their knowledge, skills and confidence with management of diabetes ("Diabetes education program," 2021). Most importantly, the counselor can discuss and help the patient overcome stigmas related to the disorder (“Behavioral health and diabetes,” 2021). With increased knowledge, the patient will hopefully feel they can manage the disease. In addition, the patient should be referred to a diabetes support group that specifically encompasses patients of the same age. In this group, the patient can discuss his own thoughts and feelings (“Diabetes and mental health,” 2021). The patient may feel less depression knowing that other kids are going through the same disease as him. Thus, a diabetes support counselor and support group are two resources that should be recommended.
RuBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites .
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohn's Disease
Review the case study and answer two of the questions posed in the study. To be considered exemplary, you must answer three of the questions. Your introductory paragraph should provide a summary of the case and the purpose statement. Remember to provide a citation for each answer.
I have chosen 3 questions :
1) Describe the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease.
3) Describe the common signs of an exacerbation.
9) Describe the potential complications of an intestinal obstruction hat is not treated promptly.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference pe.
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week 6 C.docx
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the
Week 6: Case Study Choice
. Please summarize the case and discuss the questions that are asked with the case study presentation. Although it is not specifically asked, make sure that you are including aspects of immobility from Chapter 25 within the answers to the questions, and drawing ABGs on your patient, relaying the results (note you will need to make up what would be considered appropriate ABG results based on this case), and what those results mean in relation to your case study.
The case study I picked is : Cystic Fibrosis
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and .
Some hypotheses from ASRA hypothesis connects an operationali.docx
Some hypotheses from ASR:
A hypothesis connects an operationalized concept(s) (variable(s)) with another variable or a few others. So, there are three things to pay attention to:
1) the variable(s) that the author wants to explain
2) the variable(s) that the author explains (1) with
3) connection between (1) and (2)
“a higher presence of women in professional associations will contribute to greater gender earnings equality”
“Some NHRIs will be more effective than others based on (1) the length of time each form has been in existence and characteristics such as (2) substantive mandate (whether the human rights focus is explicit) and (3) structural capacities (the power to investigate government wrongdoing).”
“NHRIs will have a stronger effect on physical integrity violations than on civil and political rights abuses.”
A few examples of SOCI380 student hypotheses:
H1a: applied science students will display lower levels of willingness to act against ACC compared to non-applied science students
H1b: science students will display higher levels of willingness to act against ACC compared to non-science students
H2: there is a positive relationship between a student's attitude towards climate change and their willingness to act against ACC
H3: there is a positive relationship between a student's knowledge about climate change and their willingness to act against ACC
H1: (a) there is a positive relationship between the number of hours someone spends on Facebook per day and the personality traits of extroversion, agreeableness and openness to experience.
(b) There is a negative relationship between the number of hours spent on Facebook per day and the personality traits of conscientiousness and neuroticism.
H2: There is a negative relationship between time spent on Facebook and self-esteem
Research Project Information
Part 1: Literature Review
Your literature review should be 4-5 pages (6-7 if working in pairs) in length (excluding title page and reference section), typed (12 point font), and double spaced. Paper topics must relate to studies in sociology and must be geared toward survey research. NOTE: papers submitted for another class cannot be submitted for this assignment – this is academic dishonesty. Use peer reviewed articles or chapters, do not use reviews of the literature. Be sure to narrow you topic so that your paper has depth. Students are asked to come to my office to discuss paper topics and prepare an outline for the paper to review with me before beginning. Projects MUST fall under minimal risk criteria (see ethics guidelines that will be distributed in class). You may work in pairs or individually. If you work with a partner you must submit a peer evaluation of your partner for each section of the project.
Introduction (10 points)
· Introduce the topic
· State the argument or purpose of the review in a clear thesis (Why is this topic relevant?)
· State topic limits you have set (how have your narrowed your topic?)
.
Mill proposes his Art of Life, but he also insists that it is not ve.docx
Mill proposes his Art of Life, but he also insists that it is not very developed -- there is an immense amount of work to be done to get it in shape. We know relatively little about what will actually make our lives richly moral, useful, and beautiful. What sort of things might contribute to improving our understanding of how to enrich our lives in this way? That is, what could someone do to develop and extend the Art of Life?
DUE by wed @ 10am central time
somebody have something useful post it and i will look/buy
.
Milford Bank and Trust Company is revamping its credit management de.docx
Milford Bank and Trust Company is revamping its credit management department to more effectively manage credit analysis. As the credit manager for the bank, draft a 750-word report for the board of directors explaining the three C's of credit. Make sure to address the following:
Character
Capacity
Capital
Also, explain what the acronym CAMEL means, which is used with the third C (capital)?
.
More Related Content
Similar to Revised 2015 .docx
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripheral systems
What challenges might you anticipate in completing this assessment?
What differences might you anticipate when assessing patients across the lifespan?
Share findings from scholarly resources that help in the performance of this assessment.
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Schol ...
Focus System - HEENT NECKReflect on the focus area or syste.docx
Focus System - HEENT /NECK
Reflect on the focus area or system(s) for the week.
What challenges might you anticipate in completing this assessment?
What differences might you anticipate when assessing patients across the lifespan?
Share findings from scholarly resources that help in the performance of this assessment.
Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference sup.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docx
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Students
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to students.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Parents
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to parents.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
15.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Teachers
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to teachers.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Informing Personal Classroom Management System
Does not include ways in which this informs a personal classroom management system.
Analysis of the implications of legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents for classroom management is sketchy and lacks depth of insight.
Essay contains an analysis of how legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents inform a personal classroom management system.
Analysis is clear and concisely presented.
Analysis draws specific conclusions about how these implications affect the student's personal classroom management system.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is in part or wholly incoherent.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Argument is strong, showing logical progressions. Firm control of the technique of argumentation is evident. Smooth progression of claims
The argument presents a clear, convincing and persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction,.
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic : Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what physiological effects this could have. Provide an example of a patient in which you might check these labs, perform a test, given an injection etc. and how the results or your new knowledge would or could affect your plan of care?
The topic come from Chapter 24 of your text. You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, you must also locate a scholarly article related to your aging discussion question. Your question should be stated in your initial discussion post and answered based on pathophysiological principles and specifically those related to aging. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
RUBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides add ...
Top of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft.
Name of the Draft’s Author:
Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Summary
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space.
Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criteria. Then use the right hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score.
Topic 7 Rubric: Persuasive Essay: Final Draft
Criteria
1
Unsatisfactory
2
Less Than Satisfactory
3
Satisfactory
4
Good
5
Excellent
Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/examples do you have for this score?
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content – 70%
Objective Perspective and Position
Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own.
Appropriately identifies one’s own position on the topic. Vague explanation of the position is given. Little reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position completely appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Appropriately identifies one’s position on the topic. Explains the position taken in a coherent way. Sound reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position mostly appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Clearly explains the position taken. Sound and detailed reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position appeals mostly to reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Comprehensively explains the position taken. Specific issues related to the topic are fully presented in great detail. Position appeals to reason.
Rationale for score:
Word Count
Word count is less than half the minimum or more than double the maximum.
Body of essay is more than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is more than 50 but less than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is over or under the word count by 50 words or less.
Within the appropriate word count.
Ra ...
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Levels of prevention
(primary prevention is most important in adult learning). Review the five levels of prevention and then focus on primary prevention. Offer three innovative ways in which to engage the adult population.
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Part.
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docx
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screening and prevention and how they could pertain to John.
Choose two of the following questions to answer as part of your initial post.
What events in John's life created a "downward spiral" into homelessness and hopelessness? Which events were related to social needs, mental health needs, and medical needs, and which could health care have addressed?
What were some of the barriers John faced in accessing medical care and mental health care?
How does homelessness and mental illness intersect? Do you believe homelessness may develop because of a mental health issue, or do you believe those who become homeless eventually sink into psychological despair?
The tipping point for many people who live at the margins of society may be things that could have been managed given the right support. How can your role as an APRN help identify, alleviate, or support those who are in need like John?
In your own experience, have you encountered a homeless individual? What was that like? Do you recall what you were thinking?
Please include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understandin.
Performance Management and Training Scoring GuideCRITERIA NO.docx
Performance Management and Training Scoring Guide
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Describe the performance management system currently in place.
Does not identify the performance management system currently in place.
Identifies but does not describe the performance management system currently in place.
Describes the performance management system currently in place.
Analyzes the performance management system currently in place for its effectiveness using relevant organizational examples.
Explain the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Does not identify the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Identifies but does not explain the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Explains the formal and informal performance feedback processes.
Analyzes the formal and informal performance feedback processes and summarizes possible process improvements for the organization.
Analyze best practices to improve employee performance.
Does not describe best practices to improve employee performance.
Describes but does not analyze best practices to improve employee performance.
Analyzes best practices to improve employee performance.
Analyzes best practices to improve employee performance and cites resources to support the analysis.
Analyze the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Does not describe the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Describes but does not analyze the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Analyzes the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals.
Analyzes the importance of training to meet organizational needs and performance goals and uses organizational examples or resources to support the analysis.
Explain how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Does not identify how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Identifies but does not explain how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Explains how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation.
Analyzes how training and performance management protect an organization from possible litigation with supported rationale.
Write in a professional style using APA citations and format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Does not write in a professional style using APA citations and format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Inconsistently writes using APA citations and format and use of grammar, usage, and mechanics are inconsistent.
Writes in a professional style using APA citations and format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Writes exceptionally and in a professional style using APA citations and format, with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics that are error free.
Criteria
Un ...
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations. Please read the following scenario and for your initial post; be sure to address all the questions posed by the scenario and include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Patient #1
: Two five-year-old girls are on your schedule for a kindergarten physical. The foster parent of one of the children indicates she received all her immunization from birth to one year of age, but after that the child has not had any further vaccines. The second child appears to have been vaccinated per the CDC schedule.
Is there a difference in the immunization plan you will initiate today for these two patients? Why or why not?
What immunizations will you be ordering for each of these two patients today?
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the convers.
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable population group that you choose during Week 1 for your paper. Select one of the following topics and respond to the thread corresponding to the question/discussion, utilizing at least three scholarly references to support your post. As a class, please make sure that all topics are addressed.
Analyze how you could motivate the vulnerable population that you chose in Week 1 ( Transgender) to make changes What is your primary health concern for this group and what theory might you utilize to encourage them to make behavior changes?
Grading Rubric
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported ...
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
Final Project (Week Eight)Required Elements of Final Projec.docx
Final Project: (Week Eight)
Required Elements of Final Project:
·
Research in more detail the topics in weeks four through eight.
·
Write on the following theme:
“The twentieth century leader’s job was about moving goods while the twenty-first century leader is about moving people.”
·
Provide anexplanation of the difference between the business landscapes of the two centuries as well as the differences between the leadership skills that the landscapes dictate.
·
The discussion of leadership differences should include the idea of how the roles of leader and manager have separated between the centuries and why the new leadership skills (discussed in weeks four through eight) must interface with people centric skills of the leader.
Required Formatting of Final Project:
This paper should be double-spaced, 12-point font, and five to seven pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;
Title page;
Introductory paragraph and a summary paragraph;
Use headings;
Write in the third person;
Use at least four sources from the course material and four additional sources from your research;
Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a reference page.
You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;
Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Written Assignment (30%)
Criteria
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions
shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions
shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion
shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions
lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims
arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts
arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts
arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material
arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the .
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741
Course Project: Part 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Analysis
13 to 14 points
The analysis thoroughly interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
12 points
The analysis partially interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
1 to 11 points
The analysis attempts of some aspects of analysis and interpretation of journal articles in a limited way. The review is more descriptive than analytical.
0 points
Not present
Use of Evidence and Relevant Outside Information
13 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with relevant facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is often incorporated into the analysis.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally supported with relevant facts, arguments, and details. Information outside the subject articles is occasionally incorporated into the analysis.
1 to 10 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with some facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is incorporated in a limited way into the analysis.
0 points
Not present
Organization and Development
13 points
The analysis is quite well-reasoned, indicating substantial breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is thorough and meaningful.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally well-reasoned, indicating some breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is generally sound.
1 to 10 points
The analysis has limited reasoning, indicating a surface understanding of the articles. The summary of each article is limited.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
13 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropriate Scripture references, course requirements, and application.
11 to 12 points
A biblical worldview perspective is articulated but is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and somewhat applies to course requirements and application.
1 to 10 points
A biblical worldview perspective is poorly articulated and is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and does not apply to course requirements and application.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Grammar and Spelling
6 points
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
5 points
There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
1 to 4 points
There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 points
There are more than 10 errors in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
Sentence Structure and Mechanics
6 points
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in lengt.
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docx
Top of Form
Benchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Framework for Leadership
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Selection of Book About a Leader Who Chose Leadership as a Vocation
Does not select a book about a leader or provide an explanation as to why that person chose leadership as a vocation.
Selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents a selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the selection and explanation. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Theoretical Framework, Style, and Leadership Traits present in the Work 2.1: Analyze theories of leadership and motivation in order to inspire followership.
Does not examine the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation.
Examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents an examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the examination. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Qualities and Shortcomings of the Selected Leader
Does not ...
Review the following treatments and rationale. Do you agree or disa.docx
Review the following treatments and rationale. Do you agree or disagree? Why? What information from this week’s content or outside information can you cite to support your opinions?
The purpose of this discussion is to recommend two resources that should be provided for a 15 year old male newly diagnosed with Type II diabetes. Unfortunately, chronic diagnoses such as diabetes have the potential to cause mental health issues in teenagers. Developmentally, they want to be like their peers and fit in to a group. It has been studied that rates of depression in teenagers with diabetes can range from 8% to 22% (“Behavioral health and diabetes,” 2021). In my opinion, there are two reasons why this patient feels depressed. First, they may not have basic knowledge about their disease and how their life is going to change. Thus, the patient should be referred to a diabetes educator as recommended by the American Diabetes Association. This resource can help a patient increase their knowledge, skills and confidence with management of diabetes ("Diabetes education program," 2021). Most importantly, the counselor can discuss and help the patient overcome stigmas related to the disorder (“Behavioral health and diabetes,” 2021). With increased knowledge, the patient will hopefully feel they can manage the disease. In addition, the patient should be referred to a diabetes support group that specifically encompasses patients of the same age. In this group, the patient can discuss his own thoughts and feelings (“Diabetes and mental health,” 2021). The patient may feel less depression knowing that other kids are going through the same disease as him. Thus, a diabetes support counselor and support group are two resources that should be recommended.
RuBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note:
The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range.
(example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites .
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohn's Disease
Review the case study and answer two of the questions posed in the study. To be considered exemplary, you must answer three of the questions. Your introductory paragraph should provide a summary of the case and the purpose statement. Remember to provide a citation for each answer.
I have chosen 3 questions :
1) Describe the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease.
3) Describe the common signs of an exacerbation.
9) Describe the potential complications of an intestinal obstruction hat is not treated promptly.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference pe.
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week 6 C.docx
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the
Week 6: Case Study Choice
. Please summarize the case and discuss the questions that are asked with the case study presentation. Although it is not specifically asked, make sure that you are including aspects of immobility from Chapter 25 within the answers to the questions, and drawing ABGs on your patient, relaying the results (note you will need to make up what would be considered appropriate ABG results based on this case), and what those results mean in relation to your case study.
The case study I picked is : Cystic Fibrosis
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and .
Some hypotheses from ASRA hypothesis connects an operationali.docx
Some hypotheses from ASR:
A hypothesis connects an operationalized concept(s) (variable(s)) with another variable or a few others. So, there are three things to pay attention to:
1) the variable(s) that the author wants to explain
2) the variable(s) that the author explains (1) with
3) connection between (1) and (2)
“a higher presence of women in professional associations will contribute to greater gender earnings equality”
“Some NHRIs will be more effective than others based on (1) the length of time each form has been in existence and characteristics such as (2) substantive mandate (whether the human rights focus is explicit) and (3) structural capacities (the power to investigate government wrongdoing).”
“NHRIs will have a stronger effect on physical integrity violations than on civil and political rights abuses.”
A few examples of SOCI380 student hypotheses:
H1a: applied science students will display lower levels of willingness to act against ACC compared to non-applied science students
H1b: science students will display higher levels of willingness to act against ACC compared to non-science students
H2: there is a positive relationship between a student's attitude towards climate change and their willingness to act against ACC
H3: there is a positive relationship between a student's knowledge about climate change and their willingness to act against ACC
H1: (a) there is a positive relationship between the number of hours someone spends on Facebook per day and the personality traits of extroversion, agreeableness and openness to experience.
(b) There is a negative relationship between the number of hours spent on Facebook per day and the personality traits of conscientiousness and neuroticism.
H2: There is a negative relationship between time spent on Facebook and self-esteem
Research Project Information
Part 1: Literature Review
Your literature review should be 4-5 pages (6-7 if working in pairs) in length (excluding title page and reference section), typed (12 point font), and double spaced. Paper topics must relate to studies in sociology and must be geared toward survey research. NOTE: papers submitted for another class cannot be submitted for this assignment – this is academic dishonesty. Use peer reviewed articles or chapters, do not use reviews of the literature. Be sure to narrow you topic so that your paper has depth. Students are asked to come to my office to discuss paper topics and prepare an outline for the paper to review with me before beginning. Projects MUST fall under minimal risk criteria (see ethics guidelines that will be distributed in class). You may work in pairs or individually. If you work with a partner you must submit a peer evaluation of your partner for each section of the project.
Introduction (10 points)
· Introduce the topic
· State the argument or purpose of the review in a clear thesis (Why is this topic relevant?)
· State topic limits you have set (how have your narrowed your topic?)
.
Similar to Revised 2015 .docx (20)
Pros and Cons to Delivering Participatory Care to Those Who.docx
Pros and Cons to Delivering Participatory Care to Those Who.docx
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Reflect on the focus area - lungs, thorax, vascular and peripher
Focus System - HEENT NECKReflect on the focus area or syste.docx
Focus System - HEENT NECKReflect on the focus area or syste.docx
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docx
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docx
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Top of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Top of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Levels of prevention (primary prevention is most important in ad.docx
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docx
Examine current practice guidelines related to suicide screeni.docx
Performance Management and Training Scoring GuideCRITERIA NO.docx
Performance Management and Training Scoring GuideCRITERIA NO.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
For this week’s discussion, you should focus on the vulnerable popul.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
Final Project (Week Eight)Required Elements of Final Projec.docx
Final Project (Week Eight)Required Elements of Final Projec.docx
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docx
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docx
Review the following treatments and rationale. Do you agree or disa.docx
Review the following treatments and rationale. Do you agree or disa.docx
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week 6 C.docx
Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week 6 C.docx
Some hypotheses from ASRA hypothesis connects an operationali.docx
Some hypotheses from ASRA hypothesis connects an operationali.docx
More from healdkathaleen
Mill proposes his Art of Life, but he also insists that it is not ve.docx
Mill proposes his Art of Life, but he also insists that it is not very developed -- there is an immense amount of work to be done to get it in shape. We know relatively little about what will actually make our lives richly moral, useful, and beautiful. What sort of things might contribute to improving our understanding of how to enrich our lives in this way? That is, what could someone do to develop and extend the Art of Life?
DUE by wed @ 10am central time
somebody have something useful post it and i will look/buy
.
Milford Bank and Trust Company is revamping its credit management de.docx
Milford Bank and Trust Company is revamping its credit management department to more effectively manage credit analysis. As the credit manager for the bank, draft a 750-word report for the board of directors explaining the three C's of credit. Make sure to address the following:
Character
Capacity
Capital
Also, explain what the acronym CAMEL means, which is used with the third C (capital)?
.
milies (most with teenage children) and the Baby Boomers (teens and .docx
milies (most with teenage children) and the Baby Boomers (teens and college-age young people). The film industry and the changes to it are deeply divided in this schism. On the one hand, musicals (Sound of Music), World War II war films (The Great Escape) and historical epics (Dr. Zhivago) drove the adult market. Rebellion, sex and individual-minded heroes drove the youth market (Easy Rider, Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate.) By the end of the decade, the tastes of the counter-culture youth had won. Anti-war film (Catch-22), flawed characters as heroes (The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly) and sexual issues (Midnight Cowboy, Butterfield 8, Valley of the Dolls) dominated the screen.
Question 1: What are some of the benefits of the Boomer generation's rebellion and changes to Hollywood in the 1960s?
Question 2: What are some of the drawbacks of having film dominated by the demands of an audience that was under the age of 25?
Directions:
Using word processing software to save and submit your work, please answer the following short answer questions. All responses to questions should be one to two paragraphs, composed of five to seven sentences, in length.
Your responses should include examples from the reading assignments.
1. Trace the development of the early documentary film career of Jean Rouch. What were his objectives as an ethnographic filmmaker during the 1950s? What formal techniques did he use to express these objectives?
2. How did Direct Cinema succeed in transforming documentary filmmaking during the late 1950s and early 1960s? Why did American documentary makers adopt this style, and in what ways did this choice influence their films? In what ways were their films also influenced by technological developments?
3. Compare and contrast two of the most prominent trends in avant-garde filmmaking from the 1940s to the 1960s: the experimental narrative and the lyrical film. How did both trends make use of abstract imagery and structure, and for what purposes?
4. What were the notable (and notorious) qualities that characterized the American underground film of the 1960s?
5. Analyze the important social, economic, and industrial factors leading up to the emergence of the New Hollywood in the early 1970s. What were the causes of the industry-wide recession of 1969 to 1970? What new audiences did the Majors subsequently attempt to target?
6. How did European art cinema conventions influence the filmmakers of the New Hollywood? In what ways did art cinema narrational and stylistic techniques infuse new life into standard Hollywood genres?
7. Trace the evolution of the Hollywood studio system's economic recovery in the middle and late 1970s. What were the important blockbusters of the period?
8. Compare and contrast the approaches of Steven Spielberg and Martin Scorsese to studio filmmaking. In what ways did each director "revise" genres from the classical Hollywood era? How did t.
Midterm Paper - Recombinant DNA TechnologySome scientists are conc.docx
Midterm Paper - Recombinant DNA Technology
Some scientists are concerned that genetic engineering allows humans to tamper with evolution. Argue either for or against this position.
This is a written paper to upload. The paper should be 2 to 3 pages in length with 1.5 line spacing, font size 12, and should be APA formatted. The readings for weeks 1 through 4, assignments and discussion activities in the same weeks prepare students to complete this assignment.
.
Midterm Study GuideAnswers need to be based on the files i will em.docx
Midterm Study Guide
Answers need to be based on the files i will email you
Identify
Liberation theology
Mujerista
theology
Popular religiosity
Mestizaje
James Cone
Gustavo Gutiérrez
‘adamah
‘adam
‘ish
ishsha
ex nihilio
‘ezer
Neged
tardemah
Beersheba
covenant
Moriah
‘hesed
Long Essay
Using
at least
three (3) course readings, be prepared to discuss the theological perspectives, controversies and/or issues on the following subjects:
The Book of Genesis’ two creation stories and their depictions of God, humanity, and the created world.
Hermeneutical process for interpreting biblical texts and the issues taken into consideration
Equality between man and woman, biblical and cultural perspectives.
How did sin enter the world, God’s role, humanity’s role, consequences.
.
Michelle Carroll is a coworker of yours and she overheard a conversa.docx
Michelle Carroll is a coworker of yours and she overheard a conversation at work about changes that her boss wants to make in accounting for uncollectible accounts receivable. She does not know a lot about accounting and wants to understand about what she overheard.
In an email, she asks you to explain the following:
The three different methods that can be used to account for uncollectible accounts receivable, specifically:
percentage of receivables
percentage of sales
the direct write-off methods
Reply to her email about these differences.
.
Michelle is attending college and has a part-time job. Once she fini.docx
Michelle is attending college and has a part-time job. Once she finishes college, Michelle would like to relocate to a metropolitan area. She wants to build her savings so that she will have a "nest egg" to start her off. Michelle works out her budget and decides she can afford to set aside $160 per month for savings. Her bank will pay her 12% annually on her savings account. What will Michelle's balance be in 2 years?
.
Midterm Assignment Instructions (due 31 August)The mid-term essay .docx
Midterm Assignment Instructions (due 31 August)
The mid-term essay will be the development of a general threat analysis of the US using the perspective of a foreign intelligence entity or service.
Foreign Intelligence Entity (FIE) Threat Analysis
The CIA's Counterintelligence Center Analysis Group (CIC/AG) identifies, monitors, and analyzes the efforts of FIEs against US persons, activities, and interests. CIC/AG analysts focus on two specific types of counterintelligence threats to US national security:
1. Transnational threats, such as the counterintelligence aspect of terrorism or the threats posed by emerging or changing technologies to the US Government, intelligence operations, and US Government information systems; and
2. Threats posed by FIEs and their activities.
Value:
This Assignment counts for 40% of your Final Course Grade for this course.
Objective:
This assignment, in accordance with undergraduate academic endeavors, provides an opportunity to evaluate assimilation of course topics, and sharpen and evaluate students' research & critical thinking skills. The assignment is driven & tested by a combination of course materials and external self-led research (depending upon essay[s] selected); analyzed and presented in essay(s) form.
Type:
This assignment consists of a research analysis paper approximately
six to eight pages in length, double-spaced
(This page count does not include a title page, abstract (optional), table of contents (optional), Reference/Bibliography page(s), or Endnotes page(s) (if used)). The source material should result primarily from self-led external research of scholarly articles. In addition, the course required reading materials may be used. The paper should have six to eight pages of content which are the written results of your research efforts.
Topic:
Develop a general threat analysis of a Foreign Intelligence Entity (FIE) of your choosing that is targeting the US. Examples include Russia's SVR, Iran's MOIS, Al Qaeda (or any of its 'subsidiaries'), North Korea's Reconnaissance Bureau, or Venezuela's Bolivarian National Intelligence Service, etc.
A FIE is any known or suspected foreign organization, person, or group (public, private, or governmental) that conducts intelligence activities to acquire U.S. information, block or impair U.S. intelligence collection, influence U.S. policy, or disrupt U.S. systems and programs. This term includes a foreign intelligence and security service [FISS] and international terrorist organizations. (JP 1-02; JP 2-01.2, CI & HUMINT in Joint Operations, 16 Mar 2011; and DoDD 5240.06, CIAR, 17 May 2011)
The components of your FIE threat analysis should include a full overview of the FIE (strength, location, organizational structures (if known), whether they operate under official cover or operate under unofficial cover--inside corporations, etc.). Detail the FIE's mission, and specific known and suspected US targets.
[Do not select the .
Milestone 2Outline of Final PaperYou will create a robust.docx
Milestone 2:
Outline of Final Paper
You will create a robust and comprehensive outline of your research paper. The outline should include:
Title of paper
Abstract
Introduction
Major points/arguments
At least three solutions
List scholarly resources to support your major points/arguments and solutions. At least six scholarly references are required.
.
MigrationThe human population has lived a rural lifestyle thro.docx
Migration
The human population has lived a rural lifestyle through most of history. The world’s population, however, is quickly becoming urbanized as people migrate to the cities. Developed nations have a higher percentage of urban residents than less developed countries. However, urbanization is occurring rapidly in many less developed countries, and it is expected that most urban growth will occur in less developed countries during the next decades.
In this Case, you are to select a country (not Nigeria and Canada) which is experiencing rural-urban migration and answer the following questions.
1. Identify the Country you have selected and briefly describe its demographics.
2. Discuss the factors that are driving rural-urban migration in your selected country? (Hint: Migration is often explained in terms of either “push factors” – conditions in the place of origin which are perceived by migrants as detrimental to their well-being or economic security, and “pull factors” – the circumstances in new places that attract individuals to move there).
3. Describe the impact of rural-urban migration in your selected country? Consider health, environmental, economic and social implications.
.
Mid-TermDismiss Mid-Term1) As you consider the challenges fa.docx
Mid-Term
Dismiss Mid-Term
1) As you consider the challenges facing Non-for Profit (NFP’s) in this economic environment: what are some of the factors that could promote sustainability for an organization?
2) How can an organization’s mission get compromised?
I’m interested in clear ideas and thoughts that are drawn from the class conversations, speakers, class excursions and readings for this assignment. The paper should be three pages and submitted on D2L
.
MicroeconomicsUse what you have learned about economic indicators .docx
Microeconomics
Use what you have learned about economic indicators to assess 10 different indicators. To add some more clarity to this, do the following:
1. Define 10 economic indicators.
2. For each, show how the US has performed, you can do this either by providing the numbers or by showing them graphically.
3. For each, in 100-150 words, give a brief interpretation of the numbers, in your opinion.
Cite the source of your data.
.
Michael Dell began building and selling computers from his dorm room.docx
Michael Dell began building and selling computers from his dorm room at age 19. He dropped out of the University of Texas when his sales hit $60 million and has never looked back. Dell is said to be the fifteenth richest man in America, and the youngest CEO to make the Fortune 500. Intensely private and notoriously shy, Dell is hailed as a corporate wonder-kid. He climbed to the top by exploiting tax loopholes, outsourcing the competition, and inventing a term called “leveraged recapitalization.”
First, review the following case study:
Michael Dell—The man behind Dell: Leading Dell into the future
Then, address the following tasks:
Analyze Dell’s philosophy as it relates to the role of change in organizational success.
Determine how Dell’s philosophy would be perceived in a low performing culture.
Identify which performing culture best suits your philosophy regarding change management and provide your rationale.
Consider the way Dell started his company; determine what market conditions made the business possible.
Discuss Dell’s approach to building his brand.
Develop a 4–6-slide presentation in PowerPoint format, utilizing at least two scholarly sources (in addition to your textbook) to complete your research, ensuring you cite references within the text and at the end in a reference list. Apply APA standards to the citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M2_A2.ppt.
Make sure you write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship through accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
.
Michael is a three-year-old boy with severe seizure activity. He h.docx
Michael is a three-year-old boy with severe seizure activity. He has made friends in his inclusive preschool classroom and is usually very happy there. He has limited receptive communication skills, and when there are unexpected changes in the routine, he often reacts with disruptive or aggressive behavior. Through careful planning and the use of a picture schedule, Michael is learning to react more appropriately to schedule changes.
1.
What is meant by "limited receptive communication skills"?
2. What can be done to improve the situation for Michael?
3. What can be done to resolve disruptive behavior issues in classroom environments?
.
Michael graduates from New York University and on February 1st of th.docx
Michael graduates from New York University and on February 1st of the current year, accepts a position with a public accounting firm in Chicago. Michael is a resident of New York. In March, Michael travels to Chicago to locate a house and starts to work in June. He incurs the following expenses, none of which are reimbursed by the public accounting firm.
Item
Amount
Automobile expense en route (1,000 miles at 16.5 cents per mile - standard mileage rate)
$
165
Cost of meals en route
100
Househunting trip travel expenses
1,400
Moving van expenses
3,970
Commission on the sale of Michael's New York condominium
3,500
Points paid to acquire a mortgage on Michael's new residence in Chicago
1,000
Temporary living expenses for on week in Chicago (hotel and $100 in meals)
400
Expenses incurred in decorating the new residence
500
Total expenses
$ 11,035
Required:
a. What is Michael's moving expense deduction?
b. How are the deductible expenses classified on Michael's tax return?
c. How would your answer to Part a change if all of Michael's expenses were reimbursed by his employer and he received a check for $11,035
.
Message Using Multisim 11, please help me build a home security sys.docx
Message: Using Multisim 11, please help me build a home security system circuit using this program. The system must include a door sensor and a window sensor. There also must be a keypad included into the schematic. A code (for example, 5411) must first be entered into the key pad in order to be able to arm the sensors throughout the home (and disarm as well). Once the command is made to arm the sensors, there will be a period of 15 seconds until the sensors are active. Please .ms11 (multisim 11) files ONLY! Thanks!
.
Methodology of H&M internationalization Research purposeRe.docx
Methodology of H&M internationalization
Research purpose
Research approach
Research strategy
Case study design
Data collection method
Sample selection
Data analysis
ANALYSIS
Internalization of H&M
Choice of International markets
International entry market strategy: Brazil and China
Expansion strategy
Why do clothing retail companies enter international markets?
How do clothing retail companies select their foreign market?
How H&M choose its entry into foreign market?
How can the expansion strategies of clothing retailers companies in foreign market can be described?
Implications for management
.
Mental Disability DiscussionConsider the typification of these c.docx
Mental Disability Discussion
Consider the typification of these conditions as you respond to the questions.
Compare the American mindsets about mental illness, mental retardation, and addiction.
Explain the intentions of social work to ameliorate social problems involving these conditions.
.
Meningitis Analyze the assigned neurological disorder and prepar.docx
Meningitis
Analyze the assigned neurological disorder and prepare a report in a two- to three-page document.
Why is it important to determine whether a patient is suffering from viral or bacterial meningitis? Explain the cause, pathophysiology, manifestations, laboratory investigations, and treatment of bacterial meningitis.
Please follow the directions and use intext citation along with referances please.
Due Sat March 8, 2014
.
Memoir Format(chart this)Introduction (that captures the r.docx
Memoir Format
(chart this)
Introduction (that captures the reader’s attention)
Description of the complication
Evaluation of the complication
Resolution of the complication
Conclusion (A new revelation, insight, or question to ponder)
4 pages minimum
.
More from healdkathaleen (20)
Mill proposes his Art of Life, but he also insists that it is not ve.docx
Mill proposes his Art of Life, but he also insists that it is not ve.docx
Milford Bank and Trust Company is revamping its credit management de.docx
Milford Bank and Trust Company is revamping its credit management de.docx
milies (most with teenage children) and the Baby Boomers (teens and .docx
milies (most with teenage children) and the Baby Boomers (teens and .docx
Midterm Paper - Recombinant DNA TechnologySome scientists are conc.docx
Midterm Paper - Recombinant DNA TechnologySome scientists are conc.docx
Midterm Study GuideAnswers need to be based on the files i will em.docx
Midterm Study GuideAnswers need to be based on the files i will em.docx
Michelle Carroll is a coworker of yours and she overheard a conversa.docx
Michelle Carroll is a coworker of yours and she overheard a conversa.docx
Michelle is attending college and has a part-time job. Once she fini.docx
Michelle is attending college and has a part-time job. Once she fini.docx
Midterm Assignment Instructions (due 31 August)The mid-term essay .docx
Midterm Assignment Instructions (due 31 August)The mid-term essay .docx
Milestone 2Outline of Final PaperYou will create a robust.docx
Milestone 2Outline of Final PaperYou will create a robust.docx
MigrationThe human population has lived a rural lifestyle thro.docx
MigrationThe human population has lived a rural lifestyle thro.docx
Mid-TermDismiss Mid-Term1) As you consider the challenges fa.docx
Mid-TermDismiss Mid-Term1) As you consider the challenges fa.docx
MicroeconomicsUse what you have learned about economic indicators .docx
MicroeconomicsUse what you have learned about economic indicators .docx
Michael Dell began building and selling computers from his dorm room.docx
Michael Dell began building and selling computers from his dorm room.docx
Michael is a three-year-old boy with severe seizure activity. He h.docx
Michael is a three-year-old boy with severe seizure activity. He h.docx
Michael graduates from New York University and on February 1st of th.docx
Michael graduates from New York University and on February 1st of th.docx
Message Using Multisim 11, please help me build a home security sys.docx
Message Using Multisim 11, please help me build a home security sys.docx
Methodology of H&M internationalization Research purposeRe.docx
Methodology of H&M internationalization Research purposeRe.docx
Mental Disability DiscussionConsider the typification of these c.docx
Mental Disability DiscussionConsider the typification of these c.docx
Meningitis Analyze the assigned neurological disorder and prepar.docx
Meningitis Analyze the assigned neurological disorder and prepar.docx
Memoir Format(chart this)Introduction (that captures the r.docx
Memoir Format(chart this)Introduction (that captures the r.docx
Recently uploaded
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
This Presentation in details discusses on Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
for studentd in cabridge board
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
Let us know about Maruti Suzuki, a successful Joint venture in India.
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is prepared for master's students (MIFB & MIBS) UUM. May it be useful to all.The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
This ppt include the description of the edible vaccine i.e. a new concept over the traditional vaccine administered by injection.
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students mobility to the Czech Republic within eTwinning project "Medieval adventures with Marco Polo"
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
This slide describes the research aptitude of unit 2 in the UGC NET paper I.
Recently uploaded (20)
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Cambridge International AS A Level Biology Coursebook - EBook (MaryFosbery J...
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
Revised 2015 .docx
- 1. Revised 2015 EEX2000 Master Syllabus /7 Description: Keeping current in the reading of educational literature is a requirement for continuous improvement of teachers. Directions: Select a peer reviewed article from an education journal that discusses an issue of interest in the field of special education. The article should have been written within the last five years. The article should consist of a minimum of three pages. 1. Write a summary of the article. Citations from the article and your textbook must be included. 2. Write an opinion of the article’s viewpoint. Using citations include how the article relates to our readings and discussions in EEX 2000. 3. Your article summary and review should not be longer than four pages. 4. Attach a PDF copy of the article with your review Article is current and relevant to coursework (15%) Insufficient evidence to
- 2. evaluate Article is not relevant or published w/n the past five years (1 pt) Article is relevant but not published w/n the past five years (7.5 pts) Article is relevant to coursework and published w/n the past five years (15 pts) Summary is thorough stating/discussing main ideas of article, citations from article/text included
- 3. (25%) Insufficient evidence to evaluate Summary is brief and contains one citation from article/text (1 pt) Summary discusses main ideas of article and includes a maximum of 2 citations from article/text included (12.5 pts) Summary is thorough and detailed and includes a minimum of 3 citations from article/text included (25 pts) Reflections/Opinions have been presented
- 4. with supported details from readings (25%) Insufficient evidence to evaluate An opinion has been stated in the reflection section but is not supported using citations from article/text (1 pt) Opinion(s) are evident in the reflection section but supported with a maximum of 2 citations from article/text (12.5 pts) Opinion(s) have been presented in the reflection section and supported with a minimum of 3
- 5. citations from article/text (25 pts) Review has been written in APA style (15%) Insufficient evidence to evaluate APA style citations are not evident throughout the assignment (1 pt) APA style citations have been attempted throughout the assignment (7.5 pts) Citations have been written in APA format correctly throughout the assignment (15 pts)
- 6. Mechanics (20%) More than 4 errors in composition, and/or spelling are evident A maximum of 4 errors in grammar, composition, and spelling, are evident (1 pt) A maximum of 2 errors grammar, composition, and/or spelling, are evident (10 pts) No major errors in grammar, composition and/or spelling, are evident (20 pts) Disability Research Paper Description: Education students must know how to write effective research papers using APA style.
- 7. Revised 2015 EEX2000 Master Syllabus /8 Directions: You will research and write a three to four page research paper discussing a specific special education disability. You will be assigned a specific disability to research. Use no fewer than three varied references to research information concerning the etiology, behavioral characteristics, historical aspects, and educational implications of the disability. Citations should be made utilizing American Psychological Association (APA) format. A reference page must be included in the paper. No Evidence (0 pt) Emerging (5 pts) Developing (10 pts) Mastered (20 pts) Disorder Insufficient evidence to evaluate Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of information defining the disorder, etiology. Developing performance is
- 8. evidenced by a brief definition of the disorder, etiology. Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed definition of the disorder, etiology Symptoms/ Characteristics Insufficient evidence to evaluate Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of a description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder. Developing performance is evidenced by a brief description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder.
- 9. Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed description of the symptoms and characteristics associated with the disorder. Awareness Discussion Insufficient evidence to evaluate Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of discussion on educational implications Developing performance is evidenced by a brief discussion on educational implications Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed discussion
- 10. on educational implications Instruction Insufficient evidence to evaluate Emerging performance is evidenced by the lack of discussion of the historical aspects Developing performance is evidenced by a brief discussion of the historical aspects Mastered performance is evidenced by a detailed discussion of the historical aspects. Composition, Grammar, and Spelling More than 4 errors in composition, and/or spelling are evident.
- 11. lacks three peer reviewed citations less than 2 content pages plus cover, reference, abstract Emerging performance is evidenced by no more than 4 errors in composition, grammar, and spelling. lacks three peer reviewed citations less than 2 content pages plus cover, reference, abstract Developing performance is evidenced by a no more than 3 errors in composition, grammar, and spelling. lacks three peer reviewed citations less than 3 content pages plus cover, reference, abstract Mastered
- 12. performance is evidenced by no major errors in composition, grammar, and spelling. three or more peer reviewed citations 3 or more content pages plus cover, reference, abstract Evaluation The final grade will be based on the course requirements, midterm, attendance, participation, and final examination. The graded activities and their relative weight are as follows: