A webinar from NARP
Speakers:
Edyael Casaperalta (Center for Rural Strategies), Jason Whittet (Massachusetts Broadband Institute), Darlene R. Wong and John Van Alst (National Consumer Law Center)
This webinar will focus primarily on the need, funding and investment for telecommunications, including broadband infrastructure. Public advocates will identify issues underlying the need for telecommunications infrastructure to rural areas, and associated challenges to funding. Associated challenges include FCC policies and directives and will include a review of FCC's plans for extending broadband to rural areas. It will examine and critique the current dynamic of public funding that is allocated to telecommunications companies, rather than to smaller entities and community anchor institutions. It will also touch on the depletion of private Foundation resources, and describe the different ways that public investment in broadband infrastructure can be funded.
The architecture of Generative AI for enterprises.pdf
Rethinking Investments in Rural Infrastructure and Access in a Changing World
1. Rethinking Investments in Rural
Infrastructure and Access in a
Changing World
Edyael Casaperalta, Center for Rural Strategies
Jason Whittet, Massachusetts Broadband Institute
Darlene R. Wong, National Consumer Law Center
John Van Alst & Jessica Hiemenz
National Consumer Law Center
August 1, 2012
2. Working together to promote a vibrant rural America.
Experience Works · First Nations Development Institute · Housing Assistance Council · Indian Country Conservancy ·
National Association of Community Health Centers · National Association of Development Organizations Research Foundation
·
National Consumer Law Center · National Trust for Historic Preservation · National Rural Health Association ·
National Youth Leadership Network · NeighborWorks America · Save the Children · United Farm Workers Foundation
3. Presenter – Darlene Wong
• Staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center
focusing on low-income utility consumer issues.
• She has litigated rate and service quality cases involving
issues of rate setting, consumer protection, engineering
and environmental concerns relating to
telecommunications, water, gas and electric companies.
• She is a co-author of NCLC’s manual, Access to Utility
Service, Fifth Edition, and a contributing author to
Collection Actions and Unfair and Deceptive Acts and
Practices 2011 Supplement.
4. Presenter – Edyael Casaperalta
• Joined Rural Strategies after serving as a consultant for
their efforts in the Gulf Coast in the fall and winter of 2006-
2007.
• Edyael's work at Rural Strategies highlights the
intersections between rural communities and
telecommunications policy, and advocates for policies that
allow full rural participation in our nation's economy,
culture, society, and democracy.
• In this capacity, she coordinates the Rural Broadband
Policy Group, a national coalition of rural advocates for
fast, affordable, and reliable Internet service.
5. Presenter – Jason Whittet
• Since 2009, Jason Whittet has been the Deputy
Director of the Massachusetts Broadband Institute,
the broadband program created by MA Governor
Deval Patrick.
• In his role as Deputy Director, Jason spearheads the
Institute’s broadband adoption and last mile efforts.
• Prior to the Institute, Jason worked in government
and community relations for Comcast Cable and
served as Project Director for the Office of
Massachusetts State Senator Mark Montigny.
• Jason is currently on the Board of Directors of the
Rural Telecom Congress.
6. For More Information on the Rights of Individual
and Community Access to Broadband and other
Telecommunications, see these NCLC’s Titles:
For details, visit the NCLC Bookstore
www.nclc.org
Definitive Legal Manuals
and Guides
from National Consumer
Law Center
7. Rethinking Investments in Rural
Infrastructure and Access in a
Changing World: What Is At Stake?
Darlene R. Wong, Staff Attorney
National Consumer Law Center
National Alliance for Rural Policy Network Webinar
August 1, 2012
8. Importance of Access
• Value of the network increases to each user, with
more people connected.
• Once, access to a canal, railroad, electricity or
highway was essential to an individual’s
economic success.
• Today, individual economic success hinges on
access to voice service and broadband internet.
9. Affordable Access: Broadband is New
Essential Utility Service
• Business and social communications
– Voice service
– Email
• Online job applications
• Paperless government (civic engagement)
• Utility notices, bank and financial statements
• Education
• E-commerce
• Community economic development stymied in
areas without BB
10. • 60% of rural BB subscribers had a maximum
downstream BB speed of 3 Mbps or less
– This is one-eighth of the peak U.S. downstream
speed
• Connect America Fund – 4 Mbps downstream
target; 1 Mbps upstream target
– 71% of rural subscribers received a downstream BB
speed slower than 4 Mbps
– 90% of rural subscribers received upstream speeds
slower than 1 Mbps
• Copper speeds were slower than fiber
Rural Broadband in Q1 of 2012: Rural
Areas Starting Farther Behind
12. Broadband penetration: rural areas
• Access to broadband nationwide: see the
National Broadband Map
– http://www.broadbandmap.gov/technology
• Broadband adoption in rural vs. non-rural areas:
– Rural = 50%
– Non-rural = 68%
• Tribal lands have very low adoption rates
– Main reason: lack of infrastructure
13. Affordable Access: Landline Still Essential
• Why do consumers still subscribe to Landline?
– Lack of cellular service or high speed voice over
internet availability
• Rural areas
– Least Cost Option
– Reliable and accurate 911
• Health problems, disabilities
– Familiarity (elders)
• But problems of degraded LL network in rural
areas
• Problems of all-IP network
– Phone outages with electric outages
14. Ensuring Access for All: State
Public Utility Commissions (PUCs)
• Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) for landline
– Historical commitment to ensuring everyone access to voice
communications of reasonable quality and price
– Crucial for build-out of landline to rural areas
– This principle is needed for new telecom platforms
• Service Quality
– Wrongful termination, mistakes in billing
– Reasonable repair time for outages, dropped calls, etc.
– Adequate notice
• Rates, to some extent
– Some states retain authority to set just and reasonable rates for
basic landline voice service
15. • Landline deregulation
– has weakened or eliminated COLR protections for Landline in
some states at time when companies like Verizon announce plans
to abandon landline
• High-speed Internet Access deregulation
– Including VOIP in many states
• Problems of no COLR for BB :
– FCC expects voluntary CAF build-out to fill the gap
• Less success than hoped for (e.g., Verizon; AT&T; Century Link; )
– Cable company announcements of higher speed build-outs
• But they target already served areas
– Verizon announcement not to expand FiOS to new areas
– AT&T announcement not to expand U-verse to new areas
– Impact of reduced competition
Deregulation Legislation: Digital Divide is at Risk
of Becoming a Digital Desert
16. Low-Income BB Internet Assistance
Programs: Limited Service Territory
• Comcast Internet Essentials (BB internet discount)
– http://www.internetessentials.com, 1-855-846-8376
• Connect to Compete (BB internet discount)
– Eligibility: child participating in free National School
Lunch program; new/non-subscriber; no arrearage
– Discounted monthly access fee and low-cost computer
– Training provided
– Limited 2-3 year offer period
– http://connect2compete.org
17. Summary
• BB is essential for enhancing the telecommunications
network for all
– Necessary to keep rural populations, low-income and elder
customers connected
• State level regulations and Carrier of Last Resort
provisions have been effective in ensuring all segments of
society are served with adequate essential voice service
– But COLR generally not provided for wireless or BB/VOIP service
– COLR and traditional consumer protections are disappearing from
landline service with deregulation legislation
• Where private companies decline to extend BB to rural and
low-income communities
– Communities may have to act independently and seek alternatives,
if possible
18. Questions
My contact information:
Darlene R. Wong
Staff Attorney
National Consumer Law Center
7 Winthrop Square, 4th Floor
Boston, MA 02110
617-542-8010
darlenewong@nclc.org
19. www.ruralstrategies.org
Funding
Rural
Broadband:
Programs,
Challenges
&
Opportuni;es
Edyael
Casaperalta
Rural
Broadband
Policy
Group
Coordinator
Center
for
Rural
Strategies
20. Universal
Service
Universal
Service
Fund
Communica7ons
Act
of
1936
Telecommunica7ons
Act
of
1996
FCC
establishes
it
in
1997
•
Promote
the
availability
of
quality
services
at
just,
reasonable
and
affordable
rates
for
all
consumers
•
Increase
na7onwide
access
to
advanced
telecommunica7ons
services
•
Advance
the
availability
of
such
services
to
all
consumers,
including
those
in
low
income,
rural,
insular,
and
high
cost
areas
at
rates
that
are
reasonably
comparable
to
those
charged
in
urban
areas
•
Increase
access
to
telecommunica7ons
and
advanced
services
in
schools,
libraries
and
rural
health
care
facili7es
•
Provide
equitable
and
non-‐discriminatory
contribu7ons
from
all
providers
of
telecommunica7ons
services
to
the
fund
suppor7ng
universal
service
programs
21. USF
8
billion
Connect
America
Fund
Schools
&
Libraries
–
Providing
discounts
on
telecom
services
to
eligible
schools
and
libraries
High
Cost
–
suppor7ng
telecommunica7ons
companies
with
customers
in
rural,
hard
to
serve
areas
Lifeline
–
Providing
discounts
on
basic,
local
telephone
service
for
low
income
individuals
Rural
Health
Care
–
Suppor7ng
reduced
rates
for
telecom
and
Internet
services
to
rural
healthcare
providers
22. Connect
America
Fund
Legacy
High-‐Cost
Fixed
Loca7ons
Mobility
Fund
•
4.5
billion
•
Eligible
Telecommunica7ons
Carriers
•
4mbps
up,
1mbps
down
•
Census
block
•
Explicit
Tribal
support
• Support/expand
fixed
broadband
&
voice
• Phase
I
–
$300m
to
unserved
• Phase
II
–
ongoing,
deploy
&
maintain
High
Cost
hAp://www.usac.org/hc/
• Support/deploy
mobile
broadband
&
voice
•
Phase
I
–
up
to
$300m
unserved,
reverse
auc7on
•
$50
Tribal
Mobility
Fund
–
Phase
I
•
Phase
II
–
Up
to
$500m
annually
ongoing
support
•
Up
to
$100m
to
Tribal
23. To
serve:
A
single
community
with
a
popula7on
less
than
20,000
which
does
not
have
Broadband
Transmission
Service
Who
is
eligible:
•
Incorporated
Organiza7ons
•
Indian
Tribes
or
Tribal
Organiza7ons,
as
defined
in
25
U.S.C.
450b(b)
and
(c)
•
State
or
local
units
of
government
•
Coopera7ve,
private
corpora7ons
or
limited
liability
companies,
organized
on
a
for-‐profit
or
not-‐for-‐profit
basis
hAp://www.rurdev.usda.gov/utp_commconnect.html
Community
Connect
Grants
24. •
7.2
billion
(2009)
•
Rural
U7li7es
Service
and
Na7onal
Telecommunica7ons
&
Informa7on
Administra7on
• Broadband
Ini7a7ves
Program
(RUS)
–
2.5b
• Broadband
Technology
Opportuni7es
Program
(NTIA)
–
4.7b
•
hcp://www.broadbandusa.gov/
• hcp://www.broadbandmap.gov/
American
Recovery
and
Reinvestment
Act:
BIP
&
BTOP
Grants
25. •
Available
only
to
incumbent
providers
or
Eligible
Telecommunica7ons
Carriers
•
The
communi7es
that
need
services
the
most,
know
about
these
resources
the
least,
and
have
the
least
resources
to
be
able
to
apply
•
Technical
exper7se,
ability
to
match-‐funds,
area
of
coverage
might
not
be
feasible
•
Areas
are
marked
as
already
being
served
by
Census
Block
designa7on
•
No
more
than
one
en7ty
funded
per
area
-‐
if
you
submit
an
applica7on,
and
a
compe7tor
proves
they
serve
the
area.
•
State
bills
preven7ng
municipali7es
from
crea7ng
their
own
networks
Challenges
26.
USDA
–
“Broadband
Connec7ons
for
Rural
Opportuni7es
Program
Act
of
2012”
by
NY
Senator
Kirsten
Gillibrand
Farm
Bill
–
Warner
Amendment
An7-‐
Community
Network
Bills
Rural
Health
Care
Comments
–
DUE
Aug
23rd
Verizon
&
Spectrum
Co.
Deal
Telephone/Broadband
Deregula7on
Bills
•
California
–
SB
1161
•
Ohio
–
SB
271
Policy
Opportuni;es
31. Rural Broadband
No service for 3.7% of US = 11 million
Unconnected areas are unconnected for a
simple reason
Economics - it is very hard to serve rural
areas and make money
4
33. Massachusetts
6.5 million people in state - 3rd most dense
State average is 834 people per square mile
Allston has over 21,000 people per sq. mi.
Rural Mt Washington, MA has just 5.8 people per sq.
mi.
6
34. Need clearer maps
Availability by
census block is still
overstated
Address level
mapping is needed
Supplement
provider data with
local outreach
7
39. Rural vs. Urban Consumers
$90 - in Allston for 75 Mbs service.
$110 - in Mt Washington for 2Mbs satellite
service with a cut-off of 450 MB use.
Density promotes competition and investment
12
40. Last Mile Technology Comparison
Technology
Type
CPE
Throughput
Key Benefits
Key
Disadvantages
Fiber Cable DSL Fixed Wireless Satellite
Wired Wired Wired Wireless Wireless
Optical Network
Terminal
Cable Modem VDSL Modem
External or Internal
Antenna & Modem
Satellite Dish &
Modem
10 Mbps – 1+
Gbps
10 – 300+ Mbps 3 – 7 Mbps
100 Kbps – 5 Mbps
(Depending on
Technology)
<2.5 Mbps
• Highest
Throughput
• Unlimited
bandwidth
potential
• High Throughput
• Generally
upgradable
• Nearly future
proof
• Uses existing
copper phone
connection to homes
• Good throughput
• Unlicensed range of
technologies
• No need for fixed
infrastructure
• Existing service
with broad
coverage in
region
• Largest Capex
Investment
• Only applicable
to a cable
operator
expanding its
footprint
• Need access to
copper sub-loop;
therefore, only
applicable to ILECs
• Frequency selection
limited by available
licenses or leases
• Possible frequency
interference
• Line of Sight
requirements
• Would not
leverage MB123
network
• High cost per MB
• Poor latency – no
voip, no video
conferencing
massbroadband.org 13
Fiber and cable are only viable long term, future resilient technologies available
today. Satellite no longer meets FCC definition. Fixed wireless under best
circumstances barely meets definition and DSL with existing cooper infrastructure
performs at lower end of throughput.
13
41. Last Mile Service Challenges
Costs – capex and opex
How to work with incumbent providers
Rights of Way and “make ready”
How to engage and structure relationships with providers
How to fund residential installation and CPE
How to treat residents equally/fairly
How to prevent “cherry-picking” of most profitable areas
14
42. Sample Last Mile Costs
$50k per mile for aerial installation
$300k for a new mile of underground
$500 a pole for make ready costs
$1,500 for new pole sets
15
49. Direct Funding Rural Broadband
Broadband provider investment
Private Investment - business or organizations
Government appropriations, grants or loans
Connect America Fund/Lifeline
22
50. Collaborative Funding
Contributions in aid of construction
Partner with Smart Grid networks
Overlash to existing fiber
Donated time, materials or assets
Non-traditional deployments
23
52. Leveraging Policy Tools
Policy statements - broadband speed, availability
Provide access to state assets - towers, ROW
Aggregate customer demand
Provide technical assistance
Video franchising
25
53. Broadband Network Deployment
Planning - identify/define project goals?
Build team - champions, consultants, contractors, vendors
Network design, engineering and costs
Project permits and right of way agreements
Major construction - make ready/infrastructure deployment
Testing and acceptance
Ongoing operating and maintenance
26
54. Network Sustainability
Solid business model
Drive customer adoption and aggregation
Products, services and prices
Network maintenance and operations
Infrastructure management
27