RESTORE Train the Trainer WG3 Brussles_M.Brown (2019_02)

1. COST is supported by
The EU Framework Programme
Horizon 2020
This presentation is based upon work from COST Action RESTORE CA16114, supported by COST (European
Cooperation in Science and Technology).
www.eurestore.eu
Martin Brown, Fairsnape
WG3
Train the Trainer
Brussels Feb 2019

2. PQQ
PRE QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
DE-SELECTION – FILTERING OUT THOSE WHO CANNOT DELIVER

3. The Pre-Qualification Questionnaire’s purpose is to
assess the capability and competency of the supply
chain (contractor, sub-contractor and suppliers) to
complete the work, and provide the opportunity to
demonstrate a track record through the
submission of evidence.
DE-SELECTION – FILTERING OUT THOSE WHO CANNOT DELIVER

6. 200+
71
6
3
2
1

7. PAS 91 is a series of common questions on
core requirements of capability
that are assessed once by a client
rather than at each project bid,
to ensure you are eligible for
.
WHAT IS IT?

8. Supplier identity, key roles and contact information
Financial information
Business and professional standing
Health and safety policy and capability
PAS 91
Equal opportunity and diversity policy and capability
Environmental management policy and capability
Quality management policy and capability
Building Information Modeling
Social Value
PAS 91

9. PQQ PROBLEMS
The cost of wining construction work
through competitive bidding across
the EU can be estimated as being
€76million, and the cost of ‘not
winning’ bids is possibly
€64 million … unsustainable.

10. PQQ PROBLEMS
Construction costs are bloated and
inflated with waste (MUDA).
We have lost the understanding of cost
and price.

12. PQQ …
FutuREstorative

13. PQQ PROBLEMS
Sustainability, in particular regenerative or
restorative is not dealt with in any
meaningfull depth.

14. STAGE I – PART B
QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION
WEIGHTING
B
Declaration All details requested should be provided and the declaration signed.
If not the applicant is unsuitable and reviewers should not proceed
Section 1 – Company Details
Capability
All details requested should be provided. If not the applicant is
unsuitable and reviewers should not proceed
20
Section 2 – Financial Details
Strategically Critical Turnover
All details requested should be provided and Financial Check
should be carried out. If not satisfactory the applicant is unsuitable
and should not proceed.
15
Section 3 – Collaborative Working 13
Section 4 - Quality Management 5
Section 5 – Health & Safety 10
Section 6 – Personnel & Training 15
Section 7 – Equality & Diversity 2
Section 8 – Developing Skills in Construction 8
Section 9 – Client Management 10
Section 10 - References For information only (2 References submitted)
Section 11 - Environment 2

15. COST is supported by
The EU Framework Programme
Horizon 2020
This presentation is based upon work from COST Action RESTORE CA16114, supported by COST (European
Cooperation in Science and Technology).
www.eurestore.eu
Martin Brown, Fairsnape
WG3
Train the Trainer
Brussels Feb 2019

16. Instead of a world that is merely a less bad
version of the one we currently have, we ask
—
WHAT DOES GOOD LOOK LIKE?
IMAGINE IF EVERY ACT OF
CONSTRUCTION MAKE THE PLANET A
BETTER PLACE
REGENERATIVE
CONSTRUCTION

17. Koper Key Drivers
PROSTRUCTION not CONSTRUCTION
PROSUMERS not CONSUMERS
INHABITANTS not BUILDING USERS

18. 1 + 1 = 3

20. 1+1 = < 2 1+1 = > 2

22. PQQ … WG3.1

23. PQQ … WG3.1
The bid process is the vital link, or transition between the design
stage and the construction and operational phases that will
realise your regenerative sustainable visions.
Bidding can be seen as fulfilling two functions, securing
organisations with the capability (commitment, expertise and
passion) towards sustainability, and agreeing the price for the
delivery, operation and possibly life cycle of your design.

24. PQQ … WG3.1

26. “ T O D A Y I S T H E W O R S T T H I S
B U I L D I N G S H O U L D E V E R
P E R F O R M A T … ”
K E V I N H Y D E S O N BU I L D I N G O P E N I N G DAY
@fairsnape
CAN BUILDINGS LEARN?
WHY DO WE SEE END OF LIFE AS ‘DEMOLITION’
DO WE ONLY USE BUILDINGS?
ARE WE OCCUPANTS (PASSIVE) OR INHABITANTS (ACTIVE)
ARE WE PROSUMERS OR CONSUMERS

27. BUILDING
LAYERS AGE
AND ARE
REPACED WITH
DIIFFRENT
RYTHYMS
SITE
STRUCTURE
SHELL
SERVICES
SPACE
STUFF

28. ReSOLVE
REGENERATE
SHARE
OPTIMISE
LOOP
VIRTUALISE
EXCHANGE
Shift to renewable energy
Reclaim, retain, restore health of ECO systems
Return recovered biological resources to the biosphere
Share Assets
Reuse, Reconfigure
Prolong life through maintenance, design for durability, upgrading,
Increase performance and efficiency of building or product
Remove waste in production, in supply chain
Leverage (big) data automation remote sensing and steering
Remanufacture products or components
Recycle Materials
Dematerialise directly (books, cd’s travel)
Dematerialise indirectly (online)
Replace old with advanced non-renewable materials
Apply new technologies, 3D printing
Choose new products /services (multimodal transport
Digest anaerobically
Extract biochemicals from organic waste

29. 6
Principles
1. Document materials and methods for deconstruction.
As-built drawings, labeling of connections and materials, and
a “deconstruction plan” in the specifica t ions all contribute to
effic
i
ent di sassemb l y and deconstruct ion.
2. Select materialsusingthepr ecautionary principle*.
Materials that are chosen with consideration for future impacts
and that have high quality will retain value and/or be more
feasible for reuse and recycling.
3. Design connections that are accessible. Visually, physi-
cally, and ergonomically accessible connections will increase
effic
i
ency and avoid requirements for expensive equipment
or extensive environmental health and safety protections for
workers.
4. Minimize or eliminate chemical connections. Binders,
sealers and glues on, or in materials, make them difficu l t to
separate and recycle, and increase the potential for negative
human and ecological health impacts from their use.
5. Use bolted, screwed and nailed connections. Using stan-
dard and limited palettes of connectors will decrease tool
needs, and time and effort to switch between them.
Ten Key Principlesfor DfD
In “De architectura” or “OnArchitecture”, written by the Roman architect Vitruvius in the firs t century B.C., the fundamental
principles of architecture were enshrined as: firm n ess, commodity and delight. These principles remain valid today. However
they do not necessarily account for socio-economic trends in modern times. A survey of building demolitions over a three-
year period in a major US city found that 57% of the building removals were for “area redevelopment” and “not suitable for
anticipated use”, reasons that may have little to do with “firn ess, commo di ty and del ight ” (At hena Institut e, 2004) .
6. Separate mechanical, electrical and plumbing
(MEP) systems. Disentangling MEP systems from the
assemblies that host them makes it easier to separate
components and materials for repair, replacement, reuse
and recycling.
7. Design tothe worker and labor of separation. Hu-
man-scale components or conversely attuning to ease of
removal by standard mechanical equipment will decrease
labor intensity and increase the ability to incorporate a
variety of skill levels.
8. Simplicity of structureand form. Simple open-span
structural systems, simple forms, and standard dimen-
sional grids will allow for ease of construction and de-
construction in increments.
9. Interchangeability. Using materials and systems that
exhibit principles of modularity, independence, and stan-
dardization will facilitate reuse.
10. Safe deconstruction. Allowing for movement and
safety of workers, equipment and site access, and ease
of materials flow will make renovation and disassembly
more economical and reduce risk.